Bristol Palin chooses life. Now leave her alone.

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 1, 2008 01:22 PM


Photoshop: David Lunde

The Palin family values the sanctity of life. They talk the talk and walk the walk. It is driving the Left absolutely insane beyond the farthest reaches of unhingedness. Now comes the news that 17-year-old daughter Bristol is pregnant. “News” that wouldn’t be news but for the nutroots P.D.S. conspiracy theories that won’t die.

NYPost:

The 17-year-old daughter of Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin is pregnant, Palin said on Monday in an announcement intended to knock down rumors by liberal bloggers that Palin faked her own pregnancy to cover up for her child.

Bristol Palin, one of Alaska Gov. Palin’s five children with her husband, Todd, is about five months pregnant and is going to keep the child and marry the father, the Palins said in a statement released by the campaign of Republican presidential candidate John McCain.

The official family statement on the McCain website:

“We have been blessed with five wonderful children who we love with all our heart and mean everything to us. Our beautiful daughter Bristol came to us with news that as parents we knew would make her grow up faster than we had ever planned. We’re proud of Bristol’s decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents. As Bristol faces the responsibilities of adulthood, she knows she has our unconditional love and support.

“Bristol and the young man she will marry are going to realize very quickly the difficulties of raising a child, which is why they will have the love and support of our entire family. We ask the media to respect our daughter and Levi’s privacy as has always been the tradition of children of candidates.”

What will the bottom-feeders do next? Investigate their dating history? Hound them during their pre-natal visits a la Alan Colmes?

***

We know what Obama and company think she should have done. Remember?

“Look, I got two daughters — 9 years old and 6 years old,” he said. “I am going to teach them first about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.

One ticket sees this as a blessing. The other sees it as a curse. Could the core differences between the two be any starker?

***

Ed Morrissey shares his experience: “We have walked in the Palins’ shoes.”

Posted in: Abortion

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Oy: Palin’s daughter is pregnant; Update: Evangelicals rally to Palin?
  2. Sarah Palin Strong Christian Mom and Soon to be Grandmom: « Riggword Weblog
  3. Bristol Palin Pregnant | Democrat=Socialist
  4. Breaking: Bristol Palin Pregnant! : Stop The ACLU
  5. Hyscience
  6. Conservatives vs. Liberals on abortion…It’s, like, life ‘n’ death « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
  7. Sarah Palin’s Daughter “Punished With A Baby”–UPDATED « Blog Entry « Dr. Melissa Clouthier
  8. Breeders breeding breeders: will this horror never end?
  9. Bristol Palin: Punished with a Baby? « The Dude’s Blog
  10. Palin’s Daughter Pregnant « Above My Pay Grade!
  11. The Other McCain: Bristol Palin pregnant, mom says
  12. JammieWearingFool
  13. BizzyBlog » Obama v. Palin: The Contrast Could Not Be More Stark
  14. This ain’t Hell, but you can see it from here » Blog Archive » Let the Frenzy Begin
  15. This ain’t Hell, but you can see it from here » Blog Archive » Let the Frenzy Begin
  16. A Blog For All
  17. Bristol Palin Pregnant ( To Be “Punished” With Baby) « Nice Deb
  18. TacJammer
  19. Patterico’s Pontifications » Sarah Palin’s Daughter Bristol Is Five Months Pregnant; Andrew Sullivan Still Wants Proof Sarah Palin’s Four-Month Old Child Isn’t Hers
  20. ProLifeBlogs
  21. Sierra Faith
  22. Bristol Palin Pregnant - We Wish Them All The Best. : BigMouthFrog
  23. Leave Bristol Palin alone | Tennessee Talk.com
  24. A rare lucid moment of morality for the left « Right Minded Online
  25. Possible Palin Scandal Already? - Page 21 - Debate Politics Forums
  26. Calanda-Technology.Com » Blog Archive » Obama v. Palin: The Contrast Could Not Be More Stark
  27. Bristol Palin: Sara Palin Daughter : Bristol Palin Pregnant | Simon Said
  28. UrbanGrounds
  29. From StopTheACLU -Breaking: Bristol Palin Pregnant! « ZachJonesIsHome - Helping to Keep an Eye on the Larry Sinclair Allegations
  30. The Mahablog » The RNC Begins
  31. Bristol Palin is pregnant | Christopher Hedges
  32. Sarah Palin's Daughter Is Pregnant, Mary Jo Kopechne Had No Comment | Stuck On Stupid
  33. Swamp Hermit’s *QUICK* Bits « The Swamp Hermit’s Report
  34. Sarah Palin and Family | Right Voices
  35. James Carville: Liberal Pit Bull « Thespis Journal
  36. Bristol Palin « Benison Blog
  37. Looking quickly at today’s coverage…. « American Sentinel
  38. My Thoughts : Real Worcester
  39. Political Party Poop
  40. Lay-Off Bristol Palin « Dianej’s Weblog
  41. Conservative Reaction To Palin Pregnancy | Politics - Sharpy News
  42. Michelle Malkin » The choice: Blessing vs. punishment
  43. American Street » Blog Archive » All Others Palin Comparison…
  44. Sarah Palin: A Clusterfuck In Many Acts | Caffeine-Fueled
  45. Is Your Baby a Blessing or Punishment? « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  46. Knight of Faith Sarah Palin vs. Knight of Infinity Barack Obama « Pronk Palisades
  47. F3 Coalition - [Faith. Family. Freedom.] » Blog Archive » Blessing or Punishment
  48. I haven’t seen so many assassination attempts since the Soviet Union. « Belvedere
  49. Bristol’s Wedding » Michelle on Bristol
  50. Obama and 7 Things God Hates: « Riggword Weblog
  51. ThruFire » This election is about life!

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #432620
    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:40 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    I guess the trolls finished their dinners.

    Stick to the Bristol story.

  2. #432621
    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:41 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Yes, I do. And if you’re someone who needs to actively and casually insult gay people, then you do have an irrational fear.

    I see. PDS, no… it’s Palinphobia. Nice ring to it, methinks.

    “Agree” with it? What’s there to agree with? Two people love each, and want the state to recognise that, just as it recognises everyone else. They happen to be of the same gender. So what? Honestly, grow up already.

    Okay. I’m now on notice with respect to your intellectual abilities. If I have to explain this to you there really is no point in furthering the discussion.

    Hate to break it to you, but wishing the denial of rights to your brother, and to gays everywhere, is absolutely a very, very hateful thing

    Hate to break it to ya but he has no desire to redefine marriage as between a man and a woman. Therefore, your theory that I would deny him anything rings hollow. Besides, what rights have they been denied?

  3. #432623
    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:43 pm, Omu said:

    Trying to change marriage to fit your definition is an encroachment on my rights.

    How? How does gay people getting married infringe on your rights in any way? Really, my mind boggles whenever I hear this ridiculous argument.

  4. #432624
    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:43 pm, JamieD said:

    Experience? Yes, I see that Obama is very capable of running a.. not so good, shark like campaign, but that still does not qualify him to run the country.

    Where is his other management experience?

    His Ayers school reform project spent 5 years and millions of dollars and had 0 (that’s ZERO) impact on the grade results of the schools it was supposed to reform. I say that was failed management experience. So where is the proof of his capability.

    Sorry, I guess we are a little OT here.

  5. #432625
    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:44 pm, navywife91 said:

    Stick to the Bristol story.

    I believe the term is obfuscate. It’s a word they know well. Well, they may not know it, but they do it well.

  6. #432627
    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:45 pm, joetimek said:

    I try to remember this part of a simple prayer when I feel like slinging mud right back at the fierce leftists: …And if wicked men insult and hate you, all because of me- Blessed, blessed are you.

    Forgive my mood for being religious here, but it also reminds me of this bible passage: http://bible.cc/romans/12-20.htm .

    Let’s all remember that these moonbats aren’t quite in power yet. Thank God.

  7. #432629
    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:47 pm, djj said:

    I am sad to hear that Bristol is expecting a child at the age of 17. It will not be easy for her. But I totally agree with her decision to marry the father and have the baby.

  8. #432631
    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:47 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:43 pm, Omu wailed:

    Really, my mind boggles whenever I hear this ridiculous argument.

    Rilly. Omu’s mind also boggles when counting to 100. Rilly. I think Omu’s little mind boggles a lot. Rilly. It’s in a constant state of boggulation. Rilly. Ridiculouth!

  9. #432632
    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:48 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:44 pm, navywife91 said:
    Stick to the Bristol story.
    I believe the term is obfuscate. It’s a word they know well. Well, they may not know it, but they do it well.

    Somewhere, in some seedy portion of the internet, they got their marching orders:

    -Deny
    -Obfuscate
    -Lie
    -Ad Hominem attack

    The latest batch of trolls are here to generate noise, nothing else. With the recent open registration so close to the conventions, we knew it had to happen sooner or later.

  10. #432634
    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:50 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    Here are the stats on Palin’s and D’ohbama’s experience.

    Read it and weep–if you’re not already weeping–Ubu, Omu, whatever.

  11. #432635
    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:52 pm, navywife91 said:

    OT

    Campbell Brown just called Tucker Bounds, “Baby”!!!!! Wow, can you say sexual harassment.

  12. #432637
    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:53 pm, JamieD said:

    How? How does gay people getting married infringe on your rights in any way? Really, my mind boggles whenever I hear this ridiculous argument.

    Hence you are proving my point. You have no understanding of freedom or the rights of others.

    I will give you the chance to consider…put yourself in the shoes and lifestyle of a “non-gay” couple who are married… and then consider that someone wants to change the meaning of your sacred understanding of marriage to mean something like between a cow and a pig.

    I’ll let you ponder this why I go back to congratulating Palin and her family for taking this adversity in stride, proving the stamina of the conservative spirit!

    McCain/Palin 08′

  13. #432638
    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:53 pm, navywife91 said:

    The latest batch of trolls are here to generate noise, nothing else. With the recent open registration so close to the conventions, we knew it had to happen sooner or later.

    Which is why we need a troll filter. Then again, they make our side look so good.

  14. #432641
    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:57 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:53 pm, navywife91 said:
    Which is why we need a troll filter. Then again, they make our side look so good.

    They are an excellent indicator of how good a pick Palin was, though.

    The spike in noise immediately followed it and it hasn’t let up.

  15. #432643
    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:58 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:53 pm, JamieD said:
    …and then consider that someone wants to change the meaning of your sacred understanding of marriage to mean something like between a cow and a pig.

    It’s much more than that they want to define the definition down, it’s HOW they want to change the definition: judicial fiat.

  16. #432647
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:01 pm, Omu said:

    navywife91 wrote:

    How is drilling in a teeny, tiny part of ANWR going to destroy the environment? Many people, who are experts in this field, (unlike you and I) completely disagree.

    And there are many who think we’ve done enough to damage our environment as it is. There’s a reason the ANWR was designated as such.

    For whatever reason she signed this benefits bill, she signed it. Somehow you still say she hates gays. Why do you use the word “hate” so much. Just because people disagree, it doesn’t mean they hate. Do you hate conservatives or Republicans?

    She signed it because she was forced to. She could have refused, and gone to court, and spent thousands of dollars on fees and wasted lots of time only to lose, but instead she chose the easy option and signed the bill through gritted teeth.

    Denying gay people rights is hatred. There is no logical, reasonable cause to deny gayse the rights they deserve, so going ahead and denying these rights anyway is most definitely the result of hatred.

    No, I do not hate Republicans. I agree fundamentally with conservatism. I’m just disappointed that the GOP isn’t really about conservatism any more – it’s all about hating gay and pandering to hateful faux Christians.

  17. #432649
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:01 pm, JamieD said:

    It’s much more than that they want to define the definition down, it’s HOW they want to change the definition: judicial fiat.

    Agreed!

    Then again, they make our side look so good.

    Yes they Do!

    Go ‘Cuda

  18. #432650
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:03 pm, Wayfaring Stranger said:

    … the phrase is

    “talk the walk, walk the talk”…

    Respectfully, please see this from Common Error in English:

    Aristotle’s followers are said to have discussed philosophy while walking about with him—hence their name: “peripatetics.” I suppose they could be have been said to “walk the talk.”

    For the rest of us, the saying is “if you’re going to talk the talk, you’ve got to walk the walk”—a modern version of old sayings like “actions speak louder than words” and “practice what you preach.” Another early form of the expression was “walk it like you talk it.”

    Many people now condense this to “walk the talk,” which makes a sort of sense (act on your speech), but strikes those who are more familiar with the original form as confused.

    Ergo, you are both correct. :)

  19. #432652
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:08 pm, Omu said:

    I will give you the chance to consider…put yourself in the shoes and lifestyle of a “non-gay” couple who are married… and then consider that someone wants to change the meaning of your sacred understanding of marriage to mean something like between a cow and a pig.

    Wow – thank you for proving my point. You really don’t have anything even remotely resembling sound or reasonable logic to back up your hideously asinine claim that gay marriage infringes on the freedom of straight people. Nice.

    I am a straight, married man. I don’t need to place myself in those shows, but whatever. And I know for a fact that allowing my gay neighbours to get married is not going to weaken my own marriage (and if it would, the problem would be with my marriage) and if anything, it would strengthen the meaning in that I would feel like I was a part of something that wasn’t being denied to a great many couples for the simple reason that they’re the ‘wrong’ gender.

    Are you seriously comparing the love that a gay male, or female, couple would share to that of a “cow and pig”? Please tell me that was a joke? Please?

  20. #432656
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:14 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    This is what happens when the feds start to regulate toilets. Now you have to flush twice if you don’t want an Omu.

    How did it get in here?

  21. #432657
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:14 pm, navywife91 said:

    And there are many who think we’ve done enough to damage our environment as it is. There’s a reason the ANWR was designated as such.

    Doesn’t prove she wants to destroy the enviroment, but I guess to you it does.

    She signed it because she was forced to

    .

    If she is such a hate-filled, religious conservative, they could never have forced her to do anything, so that’s bull.

    Denying gay people rights
    is hatred

    I can only speak for myself, but I am not interested in denying any gay person rights. Heck, being on this blog for the time I’ve been on it, I’m going to go out on a limb and say many people here don’t want to deny rights either, but your idea of “rights” is probably different than most. How is marriage a right anyway? Are any gay people you know of not allowed to be gay? Most of the gay people/couples I know are perfectly happy. Your generalizing about a whole group of people is misplaced and accusing those who have religious reasons for not agreeing with the gay lifestyle could be construed as hateful if we use your definition.

  22. #432661
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:18 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    I am a straight, married man.

    Hear me roar!

    Hate to break the news, but “wow,” “ridiculous,” “whatever,” “rilly” and “homophobe” are not exactly staples of the “straight, married man” vocabulary.

  23. #432665
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:22 pm, JamieD said:

    No, no joke. To me, two completely different species participating in sexual activity is just as abnormal as two of the same gender participating. I feel for these individuals and if thats their choice, I will uphold their choice as long as it doesn’t FORCE the definition of my marriage to change.

    Call it something else because it truly is “someone completely different”.

    So when someone asks me if I’m married, they do not have to ask the second question of “what gender is your spouse”?

    Beyond that, the method is what is most important. Judges do not make laws, but when it comes to this issue, they seem to think they can. Sorry, in a democracy, not everyone gets their way and no one has the right to FORCE others to change their definition of marriage. Again..call it something else please.

  24. #432666
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:23 pm, Seabecker said:

    I was listening to the local ABC radio affiliate this morning (KOMO in Seattle) when they interrupted for a special announcement.

    The announcement specifically said that Bristol was pregnant “again”!

    Why on earth would the MSM use the term “again”, unless they were listening to and bought into the lies that the lefty loons have been spewing the past few days?

  25. #432669
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:26 pm, JamieD said:

    Sorry, that should read:
    someoneSomething completely different”.

  26. #432671
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:26 pm, BernVerdnardo said:

    Omu I hate to pile on but everone has the right to marry in this country. Nobody is being denied anything, you need to settle down (and return to topic).

  27. #432672
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:27 pm, JamieD said:

    Yes, I noticed on ABC they announced the story as a “Bomb shell”.

    Hardly.

  28. #432674
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:30 pm, dakine said:

    JamieD, me thinks thee doth protest too much. Guessing latent tendencies. BTW, you are a classic homophobe.

  29. #432677
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:32 pm, JamieD said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:30 pm, dakine said: ?

    Sorry, does not warrant a comment.

    Back to topic please.

  30. #432679
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:34 pm, Rob said:

    Denying gay people rights is hatred

    The argument of the ignorant.

    Homosexuals have the EXACT same rights as everyone else. Any homosexual man can marry a woman and any homosexual woman can marry a man.

    What Homosexuals want is EXTRA or new rights.

    Personally, I don’t care if they marry each other or sheep.

    I don’t care about this issue at all.

    However, homosexuals DO have all the rights that the rest of us do…

    Although I dont think that Palin’s sinful daugher has anthing to do with homosexuals……

    1 Corinthians 6:18-20 & 1 Corinthians 7:1-2

    “Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

  31. #432680
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:36 pm, Dan Lee said:

    It doesn’t matter what the trolls say..

    After all the hoopla & the SuperBarack Halftime show that the Dems pus on, his Convention bounce was so easily erased by our girl just by puting her on the ticket. Once people get to know how capable she is, & once she gets into through a few debates with a sauced Biden, it will be all over for Obama..

    We will win, & they will weep, plain & simple.

  32. #432683
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:37 pm, dakine said:

    Your take at comment #191 makes you a jackass Jamie. Now, back on topic.

  33. #432686
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:39 pm, JamieD said:

    ABC also said that Bristol was absent from school for “5 to eight months”, further spreading the rumore that it was possible for Trig to be hers. Pathetic.

  34. #432688
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:40 pm, dakine said:

    Well, if Dan Lee says so, then it must be so. He does have his own “political” blog after all. I wish we could put some dough on this one Danny boy. I’m a McCain guy from way back (pops went to Annapolis with him) and I’ll be voting for him despite his ridiculous pick of the most unqualified candidate in POTUS/VPOTUS history, but I think he’s going down big time sorry to say.

  35. #432689
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:40 pm, JamieD said:

    Ok Dakine, totally uncivil and uncalled for.

  36. #432690
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:41 pm, Dan Lee said:

    dakine, I couldn’t care less who you vote for, because you’re a good argument for IQ requirements & testing for voters..

  37. #432691
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:43 pm, JamieD said:

    Personal attacks (in the way of profanity) in response to ones answers to questions or beliefs is totally uncalled for. If you look at my comments, I have not used any hate or name calling. So why attack me as such?

  38. #432692
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:44 pm, starlightwoman said:

    What these idiots in the MSM and seemingly some on this blog don’t seem to realize is that this happens everyday in every city and town in America. I went throught this with my own daughter a couple a years ago and have a beautiful grandson as a result. It wasn’t expected, but you deal with it and move on. Now I have Logan as the Palens will have a bundle of joy soon.

  39. #432695
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:49 pm, JamieD said:

    Excellent Starlight! This is why ABC calling it a “Bomb Shell” is so pathetic. This is worse than yellow journalism. It is purposeful negative spin.

  40. #432698
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:50 pm, love2rumba said:

    I’ll be voting for him despite his ridiculous pick of the most unqualified candidate in POTUS/VPOTUS history, but I think he’s going down big time sorry to say.

    So Dakine would you be doing cartwheels if he had picked Joseph Lieberman for VP?

  41. #432700
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:51 pm, NC BLUE said:

    Lets see–Slick Willy gets serviced by an intern in the oval office, lies to all his top cabinet members, to the American people, and under oath—Fact. The mantra of the left and the MSM was it was a private matter between his family and his God. Now it’s open season on the Palin family. What a bunch of scumbag liars and hate mongers.

  42. #432701
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:51 pm, Dan Lee said:

    Some on this blog might be naive enough to think that, but I suspect the Main STream Media knows exactly what they are doing when they come up with their hypocrite criticisms..

    Like I said before.. They are the ones championing the movie Juno as some kind of Pulitzer prize deserving masterpiece.. As long as there’s a moonbat family at the center of the controversy, it’s ok.. “Nothing to see here” if this were a liberal family we were talking about.. This would not even make the news.

  43. #432703
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:54 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    #9 mpChops said:

    This is hardly a prolife or prochoice debate. The candidate’s unmarried daughter is 5 months pregnant at 17. It’ll be interesting to see how well that goes over in middle America.

    It’s going to resonate enormously with every loving American parent whether poor, middle or rich. And yes it does splay wide open the prolife/prochoice debate because it contrasts the true American spirit of taking on the added challenge of an unexpected arrival in your family with care and compassion versus the un-american, selfish and detestably wicked ’solution’ of running away from such news by marching your daughter down to Planned Parenthood. Most parents will easily recognize that the path the Palins are walking is the way of love.

  44. #432705
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:56 pm, love2rumba said:

    “Christian conservative” lady preaching abstinence cannot even educate her own daughter much less have solutions to the problems of our country

    Oh eidelweiss, you can educate someone not to do something stupid, and many will still try to do it…at least she and the boyfriend are getting married and choosing not to murder their baby, which is what you would so blithely advocate (I really feel your civilized persona today /sarc).

    You dems/socailists don’t have anything substantive on the Palins and you are so freaking desparate…you just make me smile as you convulse with innuendo today :-)

  45. #432706
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:57 pm, dakine said:

    Danny, save the school yard insults. You want to start comparing package sizes, I’m guessing based on the content of your “blog” you’re going to lose.

    Jamie, you equated homosexuality with having sex with animals. That makes you a jackass and a bigot.

    rumba, Lieberman wouldn’t have been my first choice, but it would have been light years better than Palin.

  46. #432708
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:59 pm, Dan Lee said:

    dakine, I’m going to let you have the last word on that “package” thing, because you’re doing a great job showing how infinitely retarded you truly are.

    Do you drive a Monster truck too?

  47. #432712
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:03 pm, Wayfaring Stranger said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 4:43 pm, BlameAmericaLast said…

    Thanks for the link.

  48. #432714
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:05 pm, JamieD said:

    Dakine said:

    Jamie, you equated homosexuality with having sex with animals. That makes you a jackass and a bigot.

    No I didn’t. Please re-read my comment.

    Secondly … your attacks and language are completely uncivil and uncalled for.

    I’ll let you know that any further conversing with you would be pointless, so I am announcing my silence to any additional comments that you may post.

  49. #432718
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:09 pm, Rob said:

    “Christian conservative” lady preaching abstinence cannot even educate her own daughter…

    I gotta admit. That is one BIG point…

    Matthew 7:3

    “Why do you see the speck in your brother’s eye but fail to notice the beam in your own eye?

  50. #432720
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:14 pm, Dan Lee said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:09 pm, Rob said:
    “Christian conservative” lady preaching abstinence cannot even educate her own daughter…

    Not to mention that it assumes that teaching someone somthing equates to mind control.. People who say things like this are completely ignorant.

    The funny thing is with Liberals, as soon as a parent tries to lock their child up to keep her away from a boyfriend, they are the first ones to claim child abuse! mental abuse!

    Liberals are double minded at every turn.

  51. #432725
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:19 pm, Rob said:

    Dan Lee said: On September 1st, 2008 at 9:09 pm, Rob said:
    “Christian conservative” lady preaching abstinence cannot even educate her own daughter…

    Actually, ROB didn’t say that… he was just quoting another poster…

    I am told that Rob is actually very bright and extremely good looking.

  52. #432729
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:24 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    I sould have said “This is what happens when the feds start to regulate toilets. Now you have to flush twice if you don’t want an Omu…or a Rob…or a dakine.

    Lay off the ad hominem attacks on posters and stay on topic, you two knuckleheads. Spare us the PC name calling too. This is the last place that crap will fly.

  53. #432732
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:27 pm, JamieD said:

    I believe Libs are still teenagers, that’s why they don’t understand and want to point the blame on everyone else.

    McCain/Palin 08′ (you go girl!)

  54. #432737
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:33 pm, Lindsay said:

    Dear Trolls and Daily Kos,

    Fear. That is why you are unhinged and full of hate and insanity.

    Fear. You know that Gov. Palin has united and electrified the GOP like no one else in recent history.

    Fear. In two days, the Mccain/Palin campaign made 12 million dollars in donations after she joined McCain to win the election this year—-yes, we will win.

    Fear. The selection of Gov. Palin knocked the coronation of Obama off the front page.

    Fear. There was no bump in the polls, even after the second coming and near rapture on Thursday night.

    Fear. The conservative base of the Grand Old Party (aka, for you morons: the Republican party)is going to be heard from on 11/4/08 in numbers not seen since 2000.

    You have reason to fear even more thanks to the Daily Kos. Now go to bed.

  55. #432740
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:36 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:33 pm, Lindsay said:

    Dear Trolls and Daily Kos,

    You have reason to fear even more thanks to the Daily Kos. Now go to bed.

    And take a cow or a pig with you. It’s your right! :lol:

  56. #432746
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:42 pm, Dan Lee said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:09 pm, Rob said:
    “Christian conservative” lady preaching abstinence cannot even educate her own daughter…
    Not to mention that it assumes that teaching someone somthing equates to mind control.. People who say things like this are completely ignorant.

    The funny thing is with Liberals, as soon as a parent tries to lock their child up to keep her away from a boyfriend, they are the first ones to claim child abuse! mental abuse!

    Liberals are double minded at every turn.

    Re: this post, I knew Rob didn’t say it.. I should have clarified. Sorry Rob..

  57. #432747
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:42 pm, JamieD said:

    Not my intent…but Funnny! :)

  58. #432748
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:42 pm, vickisoup said:

    I’ve been browsing the left-wing sites all day and am in physical pain over the vitriolic and disgusting comments that are being written.
    I’m done.
    :-(
    What a bunch of sad, hateful people. The website hosts are just as bad, Arianna Huffington, being the worst of all. She hasn’t had a coherent thing to say since she switched teams after finding out she wasn’t going to be first lady of California.

  59. #432753
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:47 pm, mattymatt10 said:

    I’m getting here late cuz I work nights, but I gotta say, I’m pretty surprised at the number of conservatives here that are all like “She chose life! How wonderful! God bless her!! How joyous!” (Granted, I haven’t read all 400 comments)

    There is nothing wonderful about a girl of 17 being pregnant and unwed. So she’s not aborting it; does she deserve a cookie or something? You’re not supposed to abort it in the first place!! For people who constantly complain about the country’s morality to be going down the sewer (which is totally a hallmark of the conservative right, hell I admit I do it all the time) to blow this off as if it’s nothing is absolutely hypocritical. I’ll bet this has already been brought up, but what about the outrage over Jamie Lynn Spears and what her “example” sets for the “children”? Now, Bristol Palin is not Jamie Lynn Spears, but she is on the national stage now, regardless.

    Personally, I don’t really care about her being preggers. She comes from a strong family and will be ok. But for us to sit here and say yet another pregnant American teenager is no big deal is pretty absurd. We complain constantly that America is becoming more permissive in matters of morality, and now that it’s in our camp, we decide it’s no big deal?

    That’s nothing if not hypocritical.

  60. #432756
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:52 pm, grevillea said:

    This all shows terrible judgement by McCain and Palin. How could he offer her the VP slot, knowing full well her daughter would get dragged through the mud? How was this NOT going to be a huge story? She should have protected her daughter and said NO!

  61. #432758
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:56 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:47 pm, mattymatt10 said:

    I’m getting here late cuz I work nights…

    Thank you for your service. Without folks like you, our fast food drive-thrus would close at 8:00.

    Personally, I don’t really care about her being preggers.

    Odd. You seem to be awfully agitated by this thread.

    That’s nothing if not hypocritical.

    BS. She’s marrying the father. Don’t forget that humans were procreating long before the institution of marriage. The important thing is that she’s not turning to the gum’mint fo help.

  62. #432762
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:58 pm, nyk said:

    If you are offended nyk….den bin ich aber froh!

    Jeez, you’re an idiot.

    Anywho — welcome back, 30. Hope your vacation was restful and seemed longer than it was.

  63. #432763
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:59 pm, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 4:33 pm, lgm said:

    OK let’s not condemn Sarah Palin’s daughter, who didn’t choose to be in the public eye. At the same time, maybe we can refrain from condemning those who get aids by making essentially the same mistake.

    Fair enough. Those that get AIDS should accept their mistake, live with the consequences and not ask for public sympathy or assistance.

  64. #432764
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:01 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:52 pm, grevillea said:

    This all shows terrible judgement by McCain and Palin.

    No. Spelling judgment with two e’s is terrible judgment. McCain chose Sarah Palin for his VP, not Bristol Palin.

    How much judgment was exercised by the bleeding-heart Democrats in nominating someone whose brother lives in a mud hut in Kenya? Hmmmmm?

  65. #432765
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:03 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    LMC:

    And run the risk of being libeled as homophobes for denying them the joys of parading down Folsom Street in assless chaps and quilting? :shock:

  66. #432773
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:14 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I sure hope Sarahcuda is up to the task ahead of her. Otherwise in 2012 may I suggest Jindal and Bachmann?

  67. #432777
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:17 pm, grevillea said:

    Die Hippie, Die: Quibbling over spelling is hardly the strongest rebuttal. She should have spared her daughter this embarrassment.

  68. #432784
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:27 pm, Deanna said:

    grevillea said: She should have spared her daughter this embarrassment.

    I hope you said the EXACT same thing to Bill Clinton.

  69. #432785
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:27 pm, allrsn said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:40 pm, dakine said:
    Well, if Dan Lee says so, then it must be so. He does have his own “political” blog after all. I wish we could put some dough on this one Danny boy. I’m a McCain guy from way back (pops went to Annapolis with him) and I’ll be voting for him despite his ridiculous pick of the most unqualified candidate in POTUS/VPOTUS history, but I think he’s going down big time sorry to say.

    If you believe she is the most unqualified candiate in history. you are either: not reading all the posts explaining her qualifications over Obama’s total lack of qualitifications OR you are simbly brain dead.

  70. #432788
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:32 pm, vickisoup said:

    People, it’s the 21st century. Girls who get pregnant out of wedlock are not shunned to the back alleys of society. What is so embarrassing about this for Bristol? Do you think she cares what the nation thinks of her? Well, she shouldn’t.
    She should care that her parents are supporting her. She should care that the young man involved is concerned enough to make a commitment to her (though I think it’s risky to get married so young; that is something about which she ALSO has a choice). She should care about keeping herself healthy and choosing the right pre-natal care for her personal health needs.
    Caring enough to be embarrassed by a bunch of outraged and judgmental strangers? I hardly think so.
    And to those who would accuse me of suggesting “this is no big deal”, that is not what I’m suggesting. What I am suggesting is that this is not the kind of thing that should tear apart a young girl’s life or her family’s life, nor is it something that should disqualify her mother from holding elected office.

  71. #432789
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:32 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:17 pm, grevillea said:

    Die Hippie, Die: Quibbling over spelling is hardly the strongest rebuttal. She should have spared her daughter this embarrassment.

    Clearly your reasoning is worse than your spelling.

    If her daughter is embarrassed–an assumption on your part–it’s because she has a conscience, not because a bunch of drooling Kossacks are inseminating their keyboards.

    Bristol’s Mom isn’t embarrassed. Her daughter will marry the father and they’ll start a family.

    What John-boy Edwuhds has done…that’s embarrassing to his family.

  72. #432790
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:34 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:27 pm, allrsn said:

    My money is on brain dead…brah! :lol:

  73. #432791
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:34 pm, vickisoup said:

    Excellent point, DHD. :P

  74. #432792
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:35 pm, Bob in Topeka said:

    Obama has come out strongly telling the MSM to leave the candidates’ families out of the race for the Presidency. Didn’t think that I’d ever agree 100% with one of his statements.

  75. #432793
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:39 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    OK libs. Here’s your short course.

    BETTER: Marriage, then babies.
    GOOD: Babies, then marriage.
    BAD: Babies, then no marriage.
    WORST: Babies, no marriage, then more mouths on the federal teat.

    Study hard. You’ll be tested for the rest of your life.

  76. #432795
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:40 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Speaking of Edwards – how many months did the MSM pretend a Presidential contender wasn’t cheating on his wife? But a 17 year old gets pregnant and the dumpster divers are flooding Alaska…

  77. #432797
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:41 pm, grevillea said:

    Her daughter will marry the father and they’ll start a family.

    Think you’ve got this backwards, DHD.

  78. #432798
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:42 pm, love2rumba said:

    rumba, Lieberman wouldn’t have been my first choice, but it would have been light years better than Palin.

    So you would be more in favor of a pick that renders our selection to between two sets of democrats for public office…interesting…who then would have been your pick for sure then?

  79. #432800
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:43 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    grevillea said:

    This all shows terrible judgement by McCain and Palin. How could he offer her the VP slot, knowing full well her daughter would get dragged through the mud? How was this NOT going to be a huge story? She should have protected her daughter and said NO!

    The only poor judgement was that briefly by a young teenage girl. Surprise, the best parenting in the world cannot trump a teenager’s free will and having a daughter become pregnant out of wedlock is hardly something ‘new’ in the history of the world.

    But having a politician who is perfectly honest about it happening and who accepts the added dimension that this unexpected situation will bring to her and her family – now that is something refreshingly new and welcomed. There is just no kind of ‘mud’ that will affect people like that; those in a strong God loving family. Others may drag but the only result will be their exhaustion.

  80. #432802
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:49 pm, faraway said:

    FightThePalinSmears.com now has all the smears that are fit to print.

  81. #432804
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:53 pm, purplepeep said:

    vickisoup said:
    People, it’s the 21st century. Girls who get pregnant out of wedlock are not shunned to the back alleys of society. What is so embarrassing about this for Bristol? Do you think she cares what the nation thinks of her? Well, she shouldn’t.

    Actually, Vicki, to be more precise in this case it’s being “pregnant befoe wedlock”. It wouldn’t surprise me if half our elected officials had found thenselves in that very same spot before their nuptials.

    I wish the young couple all the best, marriage and a baby are major life adjustments even for folks twice their age. But Bristol has some tough blood running in her veins.

  82. #432806
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:54 pm, hadsil said:

    But is this good for Michelle Obama’s children, attacking Sarah Palin’s children?

  83. #432809
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:57 pm, vickisoup said:

    Excellent point, purplepeep; thank you for clarifying the issue. :-)

  84. #432810
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:58 pm, Jim M. said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:40 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    Speaking of Edwards – how many months did the MSM pretend a Presidential contender wasn’t cheating on his wife? But a 17 year old gets pregnant and the dumpster divers are flooding Alaska…

    Here’s the extra special part – Kos refused and still refuses to run anything on the Edwards story! After all, he is not running for office. Now.

  85. #432811
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:00 pm, vickisoup said:

    I just heard Juan Williams saying that McCain should have disclosed this at the time he announced Palin as his choice for veep. That is also the latest smear over at HuffPo: “What did he know and when did he know it?”
    Wow.
    This is clearly the most desperate time on the left that I’ve seen in a very long time. They are very, very afraid of the GOP ticket. :shock:

  86. #432816
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:04 pm, purplepeep said:

    vickisoup said:
    Excellent point, purplepeep; thank you for clarifying the issue.

    Yeah, I should have a nickel for every young couple who have ever walked down the aisle when the bride was enceintes.

  87. #432817
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:04 pm, vickisoup said:

    Oh No! And this just out about Bristol’s fiance:

    State troopers popped Johnston last year for snagging some King salmon out of season in Moose Lake, records from Alaska wildlife enforcement show.

    Well, that will be raw, red meat for the left!
    ;-)

  88. #432822
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:10 pm, purplepeep said:

    vickisoup said:
    Oh No! And this just out about Bristol’s fiance:

    State troopers popped Johnston last year for snagging some King salmon out of season in Moose Lake, records from Alaska wildlife enforcement show.
    Well, that will be raw, red meat for the left!

    Oh, no! It’s worse than Watergate!!! :)
    (By the way, shouldn’t that read “raw white meat” – fish, y’know)

  89. #432823
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:11 pm, dominigan said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 3:45 pm, JamieD said:

    Responsibility after the poor choice of having sex out of wedlock should always be praised as a good thing.

    Anyone who criticizes this or try’s to distort it into blame on the sexual education chosen, or the abilities of the parents, has already lost the argument.

    Then to further embarrass themselves by trying to make this a testament to the apocrypha of conservatives just enforces my belief that Liberals are for anything that destroys, and against anything that is constructive. Take abortion for example, that’s what I call destruction!

    That was so excellent I just had to re-post it! All of those were excellent points! +1

    My wife and I made the same mistake that Bristol did… and took responsibility just like her and her fiancee. Both of our families were disappointed, but supportive.

    We now have 4 kids (our oldest ready to start college) and can’t imagine our lives any other way. Yes, its harder starting out, and I will keep Bristol and her fiancee, their baby, and all the families in my prayers.

    I think you’re right… liberals are pessimists that gamble on the destruction of morals and lives… and celebrate when they “win”.

    P.S. And “nero” should be banned. His comments went way over the line.

  90. #432825
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:22 pm, purplepeep said:

    dominigan said:
    Yes, its harder starting out, and I will keep Bristol and her fiancee, their baby, and all the families in my prayers.

    While it’s not the ideal, there is just as often something to be gained from sharing tough times – as I expect you already know. We usually don’t see it too clearly at the time, but that’s the nature of life – experiences and the wisdom gleaned from them are cumulative things.

  91. #432826
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:23 pm, vickisoup said:

    I think you’re right… liberals are pessimists that gamble on the destruction of morals and lives… and celebrate when they “win”.

    You are so right, dominigan . Those who refuse to appropriate grace into their lives cannot begin to extend any grace to others. Neither, apparently, can they even tolerate it, let alone understand it, when others do.

  92. #432828
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:28 pm, purplepeep said:

    dominigan said:
    just enforces my belief that Liberals are for anything that destroys, and against anything that is constructive.

    True. You just don’t run into a whole lot of Conservative anarchists, do ya? To Democrats they are respected heroes, e.g. William Ayers.

  93. #432829
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:29 pm, nbarry said:

    How will this all play out? It all depends on whether the loony lefties have the brains and the discipline to follow Obama’s injunction and shut up. I would say that to many Americans, those who make excuses in public for Bristol’s out-of-wedlock pregnancy while preaching puritanism to the rest of us smell of hypocrisy and scandal, while the MSM are likely to start asking what did McCain know and when did he know it. However, since the nutroots are too stupid to spare dragging Bristol through the mud instead of letting us ordinary people form our own opinion in silence, this issue will benefit nobody and the public will feel slimed IMHO. Wouldn’t it be nice to debate real issues, such as national security and illegal immigration?

  94. #432832
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:38 pm, lonewolf said:

    This should not be a political issue.. Glass houses….

  95. #432834
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:45 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 4:37 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 4:33 pm, lgm said:

    You might want to brush up on your anatomy. I don’t believe HIV enters the body through the eye…unless you’re pioneering some new positions.

    Ok, DHD, you almost made me spew my drink. Good one! :)

  96. #432839
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 12:00 am, rooster said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:58 pm, nyk said: #430

    Geez,you’re a libtard!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The House Democrats’ backroom abortion funding deal

November 4, 2009 10:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

29 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

The friends of Dede Scozzafava

October 22, 2009 09:27 AM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments | 1 Trackback

NY-23 Watch: The Scozzafava meltdown continues

October 21, 2009 12:53 PM by Michelle Malkin

59 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Stuck on stupid.

Yes, Senate Dems do want illegal alien Obamacare coverage

September 30, 2009 03:10 PM by Michelle Malkin

35 Comments | 1 Trackback

Call your reps: No on Obamacare funds for abortion

September 29, 2009 10:28 AM by Michelle Malkin

87 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Pro-life advocate murdered in Michigan

September 11, 2009 10:51 AM by Michelle Malkin

56 Comments | 2 Trackbacks


Categories: Abortion



The Other McCain

» Paralysis by analysis

Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

HotAir GreenRoom