Bristol Palin chooses life. Now leave her alone.

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 1, 2008 01:22 PM


Photoshop: David Lunde

The Palin family values the sanctity of life. They talk the talk and walk the walk. It is driving the Left absolutely insane beyond the farthest reaches of unhingedness. Now comes the news that 17-year-old daughter Bristol is pregnant. “News” that wouldn’t be news but for the nutroots P.D.S. conspiracy theories that won’t die.

NYPost:

The 17-year-old daughter of Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin is pregnant, Palin said on Monday in an announcement intended to knock down rumors by liberal bloggers that Palin faked her own pregnancy to cover up for her child.

Bristol Palin, one of Alaska Gov. Palin’s five children with her husband, Todd, is about five months pregnant and is going to keep the child and marry the father, the Palins said in a statement released by the campaign of Republican presidential candidate John McCain.

The official family statement on the McCain website:

“We have been blessed with five wonderful children who we love with all our heart and mean everything to us. Our beautiful daughter Bristol came to us with news that as parents we knew would make her grow up faster than we had ever planned. We’re proud of Bristol’s decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents. As Bristol faces the responsibilities of adulthood, she knows she has our unconditional love and support.

“Bristol and the young man she will marry are going to realize very quickly the difficulties of raising a child, which is why they will have the love and support of our entire family. We ask the media to respect our daughter and Levi’s privacy as has always been the tradition of children of candidates.”

What will the bottom-feeders do next? Investigate their dating history? Hound them during their pre-natal visits a la Alan Colmes?

***

We know what Obama and company think she should have done. Remember?

“Look, I got two daughters — 9 years old and 6 years old,” he said. “I am going to teach them first about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.

One ticket sees this as a blessing. The other sees it as a curse. Could the core differences between the two be any starker?

***

Ed Morrissey shares his experience: “We have walked in the Palins’ shoes.”

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Abortion

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #401
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:39 pm, JamieD said:

    ABC also said that Bristol was absent from school for “5 to eight months”, further spreading the rumore that it was possible for Trig to be hers. Pathetic.

  2. #402
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:40 pm, dakine said:

    Well, if Dan Lee says so, then it must be so. He does have his own “political” blog after all. I wish we could put some dough on this one Danny boy. I’m a McCain guy from way back (pops went to Annapolis with him) and I’ll be voting for him despite his ridiculous pick of the most unqualified candidate in POTUS/VPOTUS history, but I think he’s going down big time sorry to say.

  3. #403
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:40 pm, JamieD said:

    Ok Dakine, totally uncivil and uncalled for.

  4. #404
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:41 pm, Dan Lee said:

    dakine, I couldn’t care less who you vote for, because you’re a good argument for IQ requirements & testing for voters..

  5. #405
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:43 pm, JamieD said:

    Personal attacks (in the way of profanity) in response to ones answers to questions or beliefs is totally uncalled for. If you look at my comments, I have not used any hate or name calling. So why attack me as such?

  6. #406
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:44 pm, starlightwoman said:

    What these idiots in the MSM and seemingly some on this blog don’t seem to realize is that this happens everyday in every city and town in America. I went throught this with my own daughter a couple a years ago and have a beautiful grandson as a result. It wasn’t expected, but you deal with it and move on. Now I have Logan as the Palens will have a bundle of joy soon.

  7. #407
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:49 pm, JamieD said:

    Excellent Starlight! This is why ABC calling it a “Bomb Shell” is so pathetic. This is worse than yellow journalism. It is purposeful negative spin.

  8. #408
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:50 pm, love2rumba said:

    I’ll be voting for him despite his ridiculous pick of the most unqualified candidate in POTUS/VPOTUS history, but I think he’s going down big time sorry to say.

    So Dakine would you be doing cartwheels if he had picked Joseph Lieberman for VP?

  9. #409
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:51 pm, NC BLUE said:

    Lets see–Slick Willy gets serviced by an intern in the oval office, lies to all his top cabinet members, to the American people, and under oath—Fact. The mantra of the left and the MSM was it was a private matter between his family and his God. Now it’s open season on the Palin family. What a bunch of scumbag liars and hate mongers.

  10. #410
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:51 pm, Dan Lee said:

    Some on this blog might be naive enough to think that, but I suspect the Main STream Media knows exactly what they are doing when they come up with their hypocrite criticisms..

    Like I said before.. They are the ones championing the movie Juno as some kind of Pulitzer prize deserving masterpiece.. As long as there’s a moonbat family at the center of the controversy, it’s ok.. “Nothing to see here” if this were a liberal family we were talking about.. This would not even make the news.

  11. #411
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:54 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    #9 mpChops said:

    This is hardly a prolife or prochoice debate. The candidate’s unmarried daughter is 5 months pregnant at 17. It’ll be interesting to see how well that goes over in middle America.

    It’s going to resonate enormously with every loving American parent whether poor, middle or rich. And yes it does splay wide open the prolife/prochoice debate because it contrasts the true American spirit of taking on the added challenge of an unexpected arrival in your family with care and compassion versus the un-american, selfish and detestably wicked ‘solution’ of running away from such news by marching your daughter down to Planned Parenthood. Most parents will easily recognize that the path the Palins are walking is the way of love.

  12. #412
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:56 pm, love2rumba said:

    “Christian conservative” lady preaching abstinence cannot even educate her own daughter much less have solutions to the problems of our country

    Oh eidelweiss, you can educate someone not to do something stupid, and many will still try to do it…at least she and the boyfriend are getting married and choosing not to murder their baby, which is what you would so blithely advocate (I really feel your civilized persona today /sarc).

    You dems/socailists don’t have anything substantive on the Palins and you are so freaking desparate…you just make me smile as you convulse with innuendo today :-)

  13. #413
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:57 pm, dakine said:

    Danny, save the school yard insults. You want to start comparing package sizes, I’m guessing based on the content of your “blog” you’re going to lose.

    Jamie, you equated homosexuality with having sex with animals. That makes you a jackass and a bigot.

    rumba, Lieberman wouldn’t have been my first choice, but it would have been light years better than Palin.

  14. #414
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:59 pm, Dan Lee said:

    dakine, I’m going to let you have the last word on that “package” thing, because you’re doing a great job showing how infinitely retarded you truly are.

    Do you drive a Monster truck too?

  15. #415
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:03 pm, Wayfaring Stranger said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 4:43 pm, BlameAmericaLast said…

    Thanks for the link.

  16. #416
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:05 pm, JamieD said:

    Dakine said:

    Jamie, you equated homosexuality with having sex with animals. That makes you a jackass and a bigot.

    No I didn’t. Please re-read my comment.

    Secondly … your attacks and language are completely uncivil and uncalled for.

    I’ll let you know that any further conversing with you would be pointless, so I am announcing my silence to any additional comments that you may post.

  17. #417
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:09 pm, Rob said:

    “Christian conservative” lady preaching abstinence cannot even educate her own daughter…

    I gotta admit. That is one BIG point…

    Matthew 7:3

    “Why do you see the speck in your brother’s eye but fail to notice the beam in your own eye?

  18. #418
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:14 pm, Dan Lee said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:09 pm, Rob said:
    “Christian conservative” lady preaching abstinence cannot even educate her own daughter…

    Not to mention that it assumes that teaching someone somthing equates to mind control.. People who say things like this are completely ignorant.

    The funny thing is with Liberals, as soon as a parent tries to lock their child up to keep her away from a boyfriend, they are the first ones to claim child abuse! mental abuse!

    Liberals are double minded at every turn.

  19. #419
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:19 pm, Rob said:

    Dan Lee said: On September 1st, 2008 at 9:09 pm, Rob said:
    “Christian conservative” lady preaching abstinence cannot even educate her own daughter…

    Actually, ROB didn’t say that… he was just quoting another poster…

    I am told that Rob is actually very bright and extremely good looking.

  20. #420
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:24 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    I sould have said “This is what happens when the feds start to regulate toilets. Now you have to flush twice if you don’t want an Omu…or a Rob…or a dakine.

    Lay off the ad hominem attacks on posters and stay on topic, you two knuckleheads. Spare us the PC name calling too. This is the last place that crap will fly.

  21. #421
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:27 pm, JamieD said:

    I believe Libs are still teenagers, that’s why they don’t understand and want to point the blame on everyone else.

    McCain/Palin 08′ (you go girl!)

  22. #422
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:33 pm, Lindsay said:

    Dear Trolls and Daily Kos,

    Fear. That is why you are unhinged and full of hate and insanity.

    Fear. You know that Gov. Palin has united and electrified the GOP like no one else in recent history.

    Fear. In two days, the Mccain/Palin campaign made 12 million dollars in donations after she joined McCain to win the election this year—-yes, we will win.

    Fear. The selection of Gov. Palin knocked the coronation of Obama off the front page.

    Fear. There was no bump in the polls, even after the second coming and near rapture on Thursday night.

    Fear. The conservative base of the Grand Old Party (aka, for you morons: the Republican party)is going to be heard from on 11/4/08 in numbers not seen since 2000.

    You have reason to fear even more thanks to the Daily Kos. Now go to bed.

  23. #423
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:36 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:33 pm, Lindsay said:

    Dear Trolls and Daily Kos,

    You have reason to fear even more thanks to the Daily Kos. Now go to bed.

    And take a cow or a pig with you. It’s your right! :lol:

  24. #424
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:42 pm, Dan Lee said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:09 pm, Rob said:
    “Christian conservative” lady preaching abstinence cannot even educate her own daughter…
    Not to mention that it assumes that teaching someone somthing equates to mind control.. People who say things like this are completely ignorant.

    The funny thing is with Liberals, as soon as a parent tries to lock their child up to keep her away from a boyfriend, they are the first ones to claim child abuse! mental abuse!

    Liberals are double minded at every turn.

    Re: this post, I knew Rob didn’t say it.. I should have clarified. Sorry Rob..

  25. #425
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:42 pm, JamieD said:

    Not my intent…but Funnny! :)

  26. #426
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:42 pm, vickisoup said:

    I’ve been browsing the left-wing sites all day and am in physical pain over the vitriolic and disgusting comments that are being written.
    I’m done.
    :-(
    What a bunch of sad, hateful people. The website hosts are just as bad, Arianna Huffington, being the worst of all. She hasn’t had a coherent thing to say since she switched teams after finding out she wasn’t going to be first lady of California.

  27. #427
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:47 pm, mattymatt10 said:

    I’m getting here late cuz I work nights, but I gotta say, I’m pretty surprised at the number of conservatives here that are all like “She chose life! How wonderful! God bless her!! How joyous!” (Granted, I haven’t read all 400 comments)

    There is nothing wonderful about a girl of 17 being pregnant and unwed. So she’s not aborting it; does she deserve a cookie or something? You’re not supposed to abort it in the first place!! For people who constantly complain about the country’s morality to be going down the sewer (which is totally a hallmark of the conservative right, hell I admit I do it all the time) to blow this off as if it’s nothing is absolutely hypocritical. I’ll bet this has already been brought up, but what about the outrage over Jamie Lynn Spears and what her “example” sets for the “children”? Now, Bristol Palin is not Jamie Lynn Spears, but she is on the national stage now, regardless.

    Personally, I don’t really care about her being preggers. She comes from a strong family and will be ok. But for us to sit here and say yet another pregnant American teenager is no big deal is pretty absurd. We complain constantly that America is becoming more permissive in matters of morality, and now that it’s in our camp, we decide it’s no big deal?

    That’s nothing if not hypocritical.

  28. #428
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:52 pm, grevillea said:

    This all shows terrible judgement by McCain and Palin. How could he offer her the VP slot, knowing full well her daughter would get dragged through the mud? How was this NOT going to be a huge story? She should have protected her daughter and said NO!

  29. #429
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:56 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:47 pm, mattymatt10 said:

    I’m getting here late cuz I work nights…

    Thank you for your service. Without folks like you, our fast food drive-thrus would close at 8:00.

    Personally, I don’t really care about her being preggers.

    Odd. You seem to be awfully agitated by this thread.

    That’s nothing if not hypocritical.

    BS. She’s marrying the father. Don’t forget that humans were procreating long before the institution of marriage. The important thing is that she’s not turning to the gum’mint fo help.

  30. #430
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:58 pm, nyk said:

    If you are offended nyk….den bin ich aber froh!

    Jeez, you’re an idiot.

    Anywho — welcome back, 30. Hope your vacation was restful and seemed longer than it was.

  31. #431
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:59 pm, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 4:33 pm, lgm said:

    OK let’s not condemn Sarah Palin’s daughter, who didn’t choose to be in the public eye. At the same time, maybe we can refrain from condemning those who get aids by making essentially the same mistake.

    Fair enough. Those that get AIDS should accept their mistake, live with the consequences and not ask for public sympathy or assistance.

  32. #432
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:01 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:52 pm, grevillea said:

    This all shows terrible judgement by McCain and Palin.

    No. Spelling judgment with two e’s is terrible judgment. McCain chose Sarah Palin for his VP, not Bristol Palin.

    How much judgment was exercised by the bleeding-heart Democrats in nominating someone whose brother lives in a mud hut in Kenya? Hmmmmm?

  33. #433
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:03 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    LMC:

    And run the risk of being libeled as homophobes for denying them the joys of parading down Folsom Street in assless chaps and quilting? :shock:

  34. #434
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:14 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I sure hope Sarahcuda is up to the task ahead of her. Otherwise in 2012 may I suggest Jindal and Bachmann?

  35. #435
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:17 pm, grevillea said:

    Die Hippie, Die: Quibbling over spelling is hardly the strongest rebuttal. She should have spared her daughter this embarrassment.

  36. #436
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:27 pm, Deanna said:

    grevillea said: She should have spared her daughter this embarrassment.

    I hope you said the EXACT same thing to Bill Clinton.

  37. #437
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:27 pm, allrsn said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:40 pm, dakine said:
    Well, if Dan Lee says so, then it must be so. He does have his own “political” blog after all. I wish we could put some dough on this one Danny boy. I’m a McCain guy from way back (pops went to Annapolis with him) and I’ll be voting for him despite his ridiculous pick of the most unqualified candidate in POTUS/VPOTUS history, but I think he’s going down big time sorry to say.

    If you believe she is the most unqualified candiate in history. you are either: not reading all the posts explaining her qualifications over Obama’s total lack of qualitifications OR you are simbly brain dead.

  38. #438
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:32 pm, vickisoup said:

    People, it’s the 21st century. Girls who get pregnant out of wedlock are not shunned to the back alleys of society. What is so embarrassing about this for Bristol? Do you think she cares what the nation thinks of her? Well, she shouldn’t.
    She should care that her parents are supporting her. She should care that the young man involved is concerned enough to make a commitment to her (though I think it’s risky to get married so young; that is something about which she ALSO has a choice). She should care about keeping herself healthy and choosing the right pre-natal care for her personal health needs.
    Caring enough to be embarrassed by a bunch of outraged and judgmental strangers? I hardly think so.
    And to those who would accuse me of suggesting “this is no big deal”, that is not what I’m suggesting. What I am suggesting is that this is not the kind of thing that should tear apart a young girl’s life or her family’s life, nor is it something that should disqualify her mother from holding elected office.

  39. #439
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:32 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:17 pm, grevillea said:

    Die Hippie, Die: Quibbling over spelling is hardly the strongest rebuttal. She should have spared her daughter this embarrassment.

    Clearly your reasoning is worse than your spelling.

    If her daughter is embarrassed–an assumption on your part–it’s because she has a conscience, not because a bunch of drooling Kossacks are inseminating their keyboards.

    Bristol’s Mom isn’t embarrassed. Her daughter will marry the father and they’ll start a family.

    What John-boy Edwuhds has done…that’s embarrassing to his family.

  40. #440
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:34 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:27 pm, allrsn said:

    My money is on brain dead…brah! :lol:

  41. #441
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:34 pm, vickisoup said:

    Excellent point, DHD. :P

  42. #442
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:35 pm, Bob in Topeka said:

    Obama has come out strongly telling the MSM to leave the candidates’ families out of the race for the Presidency. Didn’t think that I’d ever agree 100% with one of his statements.

  43. #443
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:39 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    OK libs. Here’s your short course.

    BETTER: Marriage, then babies.
    GOOD: Babies, then marriage.
    BAD: Babies, then no marriage.
    WORST: Babies, no marriage, then more mouths on the federal teat.

    Study hard. You’ll be tested for the rest of your life.

  44. #444
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:40 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Speaking of Edwards – how many months did the MSM pretend a Presidential contender wasn’t cheating on his wife? But a 17 year old gets pregnant and the dumpster divers are flooding Alaska…

  45. #445
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:41 pm, grevillea said:

    Her daughter will marry the father and they’ll start a family.

    Think you’ve got this backwards, DHD.

  46. #446
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:42 pm, love2rumba said:

    rumba, Lieberman wouldn’t have been my first choice, but it would have been light years better than Palin.

    So you would be more in favor of a pick that renders our selection to between two sets of democrats for public office…interesting…who then would have been your pick for sure then?

  47. #447
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:43 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    grevillea said:

    This all shows terrible judgement by McCain and Palin. How could he offer her the VP slot, knowing full well her daughter would get dragged through the mud? How was this NOT going to be a huge story? She should have protected her daughter and said NO!

    The only poor judgement was that briefly by a young teenage girl. Surprise, the best parenting in the world cannot trump a teenager’s free will and having a daughter become pregnant out of wedlock is hardly something ‘new’ in the history of the world.

    But having a politician who is perfectly honest about it happening and who accepts the added dimension that this unexpected situation will bring to her and her family – now that is something refreshingly new and welcomed. There is just no kind of ‘mud’ that will affect people like that; those in a strong God loving family. Others may drag but the only result will be their exhaustion.

  48. #448
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:49 pm, faraway said:

    FightThePalinSmears.com now has all the smears that are fit to print.

  49. #449
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:53 pm, purplepeep said:

    vickisoup said:
    People, it’s the 21st century. Girls who get pregnant out of wedlock are not shunned to the back alleys of society. What is so embarrassing about this for Bristol? Do you think she cares what the nation thinks of her? Well, she shouldn’t.

    Actually, Vicki, to be more precise in this case it’s being “pregnant befoe wedlock”. It wouldn’t surprise me if half our elected officials had found thenselves in that very same spot before their nuptials.

    I wish the young couple all the best, marriage and a baby are major life adjustments even for folks twice their age. But Bristol has some tough blood running in her veins.

  50. #450
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:54 pm, hadsil said:

    But is this good for Michelle Obama’s children, attacking Sarah Palin’s children?

  51. #451
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:57 pm, vickisoup said:

    Excellent point, purplepeep; thank you for clarifying the issue. :-)

  52. #452
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:58 pm, Jim M. said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:40 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    Speaking of Edwards – how many months did the MSM pretend a Presidential contender wasn’t cheating on his wife? But a 17 year old gets pregnant and the dumpster divers are flooding Alaska…

    Here’s the extra special part – Kos refused and still refuses to run anything on the Edwards story! After all, he is not running for office. Now.

  53. #453
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:00 pm, vickisoup said:

    I just heard Juan Williams saying that McCain should have disclosed this at the time he announced Palin as his choice for veep. That is also the latest smear over at HuffPo: “What did he know and when did he know it?”
    Wow.
    This is clearly the most desperate time on the left that I’ve seen in a very long time. They are very, very afraid of the GOP ticket. :shock:

  54. #454
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:04 pm, purplepeep said:

    vickisoup said:
    Excellent point, purplepeep; thank you for clarifying the issue.

    Yeah, I should have a nickel for every young couple who have ever walked down the aisle when the bride was enceintes.

  55. #455
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:04 pm, vickisoup said:

    Oh No! And this just out about Bristol’s fiance:

    State troopers popped Johnston last year for snagging some King salmon out of season in Moose Lake, records from Alaska wildlife enforcement show.

    Well, that will be raw, red meat for the left!
    ;-)

  56. #456
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:10 pm, purplepeep said:

    vickisoup said:
    Oh No! And this just out about Bristol’s fiance:

    State troopers popped Johnston last year for snagging some King salmon out of season in Moose Lake, records from Alaska wildlife enforcement show.
    Well, that will be raw, red meat for the left!

    Oh, no! It’s worse than Watergate!!! :)
    (By the way, shouldn’t that read “raw white meat” – fish, y’know)

  57. #457
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:11 pm, dominigan said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 3:45 pm, JamieD said:

    Responsibility after the poor choice of having sex out of wedlock should always be praised as a good thing.

    Anyone who criticizes this or try’s to distort it into blame on the sexual education chosen, or the abilities of the parents, has already lost the argument.

    Then to further embarrass themselves by trying to make this a testament to the apocrypha of conservatives just enforces my belief that Liberals are for anything that destroys, and against anything that is constructive. Take abortion for example, that’s what I call destruction!

    That was so excellent I just had to re-post it! All of those were excellent points! +1

    My wife and I made the same mistake that Bristol did… and took responsibility just like her and her fiancee. Both of our families were disappointed, but supportive.

    We now have 4 kids (our oldest ready to start college) and can’t imagine our lives any other way. Yes, its harder starting out, and I will keep Bristol and her fiancee, their baby, and all the families in my prayers.

    I think you’re right… liberals are pessimists that gamble on the destruction of morals and lives… and celebrate when they “win”.

    P.S. And “nero” should be banned. His comments went way over the line.

  58. #458
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:22 pm, purplepeep said:

    dominigan said:
    Yes, its harder starting out, and I will keep Bristol and her fiancee, their baby, and all the families in my prayers.

    While it’s not the ideal, there is just as often something to be gained from sharing tough times – as I expect you already know. We usually don’t see it too clearly at the time, but that’s the nature of life – experiences and the wisdom gleaned from them are cumulative things.

  59. #459
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:23 pm, vickisoup said:

    I think you’re right… liberals are pessimists that gamble on the destruction of morals and lives… and celebrate when they “win”.

    You are so right, dominigan . Those who refuse to appropriate grace into their lives cannot begin to extend any grace to others. Neither, apparently, can they even tolerate it, let alone understand it, when others do.

  60. #460
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:28 pm, purplepeep said:

    dominigan said:
    just enforces my belief that Liberals are for anything that destroys, and against anything that is constructive.

    True. You just don’t run into a whole lot of Conservative anarchists, do ya? To Democrats they are respected heroes, e.g. William Ayers.

  61. #461
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:29 pm, nbarry said:

    How will this all play out? It all depends on whether the loony lefties have the brains and the discipline to follow Obama’s injunction and shut up. I would say that to many Americans, those who make excuses in public for Bristol’s out-of-wedlock pregnancy while preaching puritanism to the rest of us smell of hypocrisy and scandal, while the MSM are likely to start asking what did McCain know and when did he know it. However, since the nutroots are too stupid to spare dragging Bristol through the mud instead of letting us ordinary people form our own opinion in silence, this issue will benefit nobody and the public will feel slimed IMHO. Wouldn’t it be nice to debate real issues, such as national security and illegal immigration?

  62. #462
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:38 pm, lonewolf said:

    This should not be a political issue.. Glass houses….

  63. #463
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:45 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 4:37 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 4:33 pm, lgm said:

    You might want to brush up on your anatomy. I don’t believe HIV enters the body through the eye…unless you’re pioneering some new positions.

    Ok, DHD, you almost made me spew my drink. Good one! :)

  64. #464
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 12:00 am, rooster said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:58 pm, nyk said: #430

    Geez,you’re a libtard!

  65. #465
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 12:11 am, mattymatt10 said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:56 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    Personally, I don’t really care about her being preggers.
    Odd. You seem to be awfully agitated by this thread.

    I’m agitated by the attitude of commenters here, not on the young lady being pregnant. It’s called “reading comprehension.” You might want to brush up on it.

    I wrote: That’s nothing if not hypocritical.

    You wrote:

    BS. She’s marrying the father. Don’t forget that humans were procreating long before the institution of marriage. The important thing is that she’s not turning to the gum’mint fo help.

    I’m not sure what point of mine you’re addressing here. Again, I’m not talking about the young woman, my comments were about other comments left here. Again, “reading comprehension.” Look into it.

    Thank you for your service. Without folks like you, our fast food drive-thrus would close at 8:00.

    That’s just insulting for the sake of being insulting, and proves along with your inability to actually understand my post, that you’re just a stupid a$$hole.

    But nice try.

  66. #466
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 12:31 am, jcjones717 said:

    I have been watching Larry King Live tonight and am appalled at the things that the Democrat talking heads are saying about Gov. Palin. I sent many emails to Larry King because he allowed one commentor to say that Gov Palin will probably be “in prison” by the November elections. Obviously, they nor Larry King have any ethics. Please help me to email Larry King and to protest CNN by turning off the Larry King show when it is on.

  67. #467
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 12:31 am, Politicalguano said:

    BO has experience: making back room deals with felons, selling his soul for long term relationships with low life scum such as domestic terrorists and religious nut cases, buying into the anti-civilization schemes of the radical Alinsky – who else would dedicate a book to Satan himself, using race to harm others and advance himself.
    He intends to punish this nation and destroy anyone who gets in his way. Whatever he was, he has been exposed to millions of mindless followers who only know that BO is going to save the world and believe every word he tells them no matter how ridiculous – this is the poison that drives humans insane from Howard Hughes to Stalin, to Leona Helmsly. He is surrounded by those who cannot distinguish right from wrong, fact from fiction, and indeed want BO to lead them. No one to tell him the truth about himself. Already he is showing the signs of believing all the propaganda his campaign releases about him. No one can honestly disagree with BO on any issue – their heresy is merely racism and should be punished.
    BO also has associated himself with groups that specialize in voter fraud and this year the Dems are going all out to steal every vote. We need volunteers from the NRA to monitor every polling station and to counter any intimidation from the thugs BO will be sending. Our military men and women need to remember Florida 2000 and how the Dems tried to disenfranchise them and monitor the voting too. We will need to set up legal teams to counter illegal actions by crooked liberal judges to alter voting laws during or after the balloting.

  68. #468
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 1:14 am, atheling said:

    Let me ask the trolls something:

    We can all agree that murder is wrong, correct?

    So as a society, we tell our children that it is wrong to murder.

    Nevertheless, some of our children still go out and commit murder.

    So does it follow then that we should no longer tell our children to refrain from murder because telling them does not work?

    Please enlighten us.

  69. #469
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 1:58 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 1:14 am, atheling said:

    L

    et me ask the trolls something:

    Hi, atheling. You are up late …as am I!

    Sometimes I wonder why we do this. That is, contend with ideas, lies, and truth (and sometimes even evil). Emotionally, it gets very exhausting and frustrating, as I’m sure you will agree. Yet, it is worth it. The Enemy’s attacks only serve to make us sharper.

    Blessings on you and others on this blog who are in Our Lord’s Service.

  70. #470
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 2:23 am, atheling said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 3:45 pm, JamieD said:

    Liberals are for anything that destroys, and against anything that is constructive.

    Jamie, you have found the essence of postmodern liberalism.

    T.S. Eliot once said of Liberalism:

    “…That Liberalism may be a tendency towards something very different from itself, is a possibility in its nature. For it is something which tends to release energy rather than accumulate it, to relax, rather than to fortify. It is a movement not so much defined by its end, as by its starting point; away from, rather than towards, something definite”.

    “…Liberalism may be characterized as a progressive discarding of elements in historical Christianity which appear superfluous, obsolete, confounded with practices and abuses which are legitimate objects of attack. But as its movement is controlled rather by its origin than by any goal, it loses force after a series of rejections, and with nothing to destroy is left with nothing to uphold and with nowhere to go.”

    “…By destroying traditional social habits of the people, by dissolving their natural collective consciousness into individual constituents, by licensing the opinions of the most foolish, by substituting instruction for education, by encouraging cleverness rather than wisdom, the upstart rather than the qualified, by fostering a notion of “getting on” to which the alternative is a hopeless apathy, Liberalism can prepare the way for that which is its own negation: the artificial, mechanised or brutalised control which is a desperate remedy for its chaos.”

  71. #471
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 2:29 am, atheling said:

    Hey, Jet Jag:

    Yeah, been gone all day, so I’m catching up!

  72. #472
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 2:44 am, atheling said:

    You know, this crossed my mind too, and now that the Anchoress has voiced it, I am getting more suspicious:

    The press is in the tank for Obama, we know that. When I read Allahpundit a while ago, I thought, “no” – but now, I have to wonder: did the Koskidz bungle a leak from the Obama camp?

    Anyone find it amazingly coincidental that Daily Kos went after Palin’s own pregnancy right out of the chute on Friday, with no apparent evidence whatsoever, and now we find out that her daughter’s actually pregnant? I usually scoff at the idea of party researchers planting memes with bloggers, especially since the nutroots is so paranoid about that happening on the right, but that’s a simply remarkable stoke of good luck on their part, no?

    I don’t believe Obama would do it. But his “camp” might. Remember, his “camp” greeted the news of Palin’s addition to the ticket with nastiness and a distinct lack of common political courtesy or generosity. Obama had to walk it back.

    Yes. His “camp” has shown lack of civility. I think that Obama’s shady associations, as with Rezko, Ayers, Wright, are still reflected in his current ones.

  73. #473
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:37 am, AlohaGuy said:

    It all depends on whether the loony lefties have the brains and the discipline to follow Obama’s injunction and shut up.

    They don’t. A CNN moron (woman, go figure) went all ape s$$t asking if Sarah could be a mother and VP at the same time. To his credit, Anderson Cooper noted that no one asks the same thing about men. Then Larry King got all excited and creepy about Palin’s daughter. So creepy you wonder about a 149 year old guy getting excited about a 17 year old’s sex life.

  74. #474
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:44 am, love2rumba said:

    The flip side of all this nitwittery on the left is that the left will soon have to deal with a re-energized angry conservative base, that would not have been re-energized any other way…this is something Team Obama does not want.…it would be far simpler for Obama to deal with a moribund McCain, especially in light of Obama’s pick of Joe Biden (who) does absolutely nothing for Obama.

    Obama in a nutshell has shot his wad and still can’t overcome McCain. Now is the opportunity McCain has been waiting for…if he doesn’t blow it by throwing Palin under the bus too…here McCain and Palin too must stand unflinchingly, and if they do they will win big time.

    For those who say that Palin was a bad choice, I would like to hear who should have McCain picked that would get him the votes of conservatives-the one group that has been antagonistic toward McCain to the point of militancy (of which I admit to have been a part of until now)?

  75. #475
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:47 am, love2rumba said:

    So creepy you wonder about a 149 year old guy getting excited about a 17 year old’s sex life.

    That really underscores why Larry King needs to be retired and rendered vocationally kaput

  76. #476
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 5:49 am, deedledee said:

    I wish the Palins the best; who doesn’t know family or friends that have dealt with this situation and now have teenagers, college students or adult children born in these difficult times who are now their pride and joy.

  77. #477
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 6:14 am, ex-expat said:

    For what it is worth, this is not the first, or last time sex is part of a Presidential race.

    Gorver Cleveland fathered a child out of wedlock. This becoming public prompted his opponents to create the chant/heckle “Ma, ma, where is Pa? Gone to the White House, ha, ha, ha.”

    We all know of course that in spite of this, CLeveland was elected to the office.

    Wonder what the Kod Kidz would have done back then?

  78. #478
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 6:41 am, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 12:11 am, mattymatt10 said:

    I’m agitated by the attitude of commenters here…

    Then call a waaaaahmbulance and get treatment for your debilitating agitation.

    Before you launch with the name calling, you might want to elaborate on where you find hypocrisy in our comments.

    That’s called “communication.” You might want to brush up on it.

  79. #479
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 6:47 am, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 6:14 am, ex-expat said:

    Wonder what the Kod Kidz would have done back then?

    One of two things: 1) continued gnawing at the leather restraints of their straitjackets or 2) gone back to the barn and made sweet equine love to Wilbur.

  80. #480
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 8:35 am, lgm said:

    It seems to me that you get aids and pregnant doing more or less the same thing, having unprotected sex.

  81. #481
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 9:19 am, Irish Rose said:

    Keep it up, freaks.
    It’s going to cost you the election.

    I said this earlier over at LGF and I’ll repeat it here… having both a woman and a black man on the ticket at the same time, has unleashed a level of crazy in the Dem party that I’ve not seen in my lifetime.

    I think that we can safely say that 2008 is the year that the diseased gut of the Democratic party officially ruptured. The whole d*mned party is bloated and infected, and the infection is now spilling out for all the world to see.

    I think that we can also safely say that 2008 is going to be the year that female voters in this country decide that they’ve finally had enough, and abandon the Democratic party to either vote Republican or Independent.

    It’s become crystal clear to many if not most women of voting age that the Dem party is the party of mysogeny.

    The Democratic party is about to lose HUGE chunks of its’ demographic… women voters, black voters, moderates. And they don’t even seem to care. They’re so bent on spewing their poisonous vomit onto the American political scene that they’ve become detached from reality.

  82. #482
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 9:21 am, Irish Rose said:

    #474 love2rumba

    Great post, and spot on.

  83. #483
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 9:28 am, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    lgm, you missed my previous point. Bristol had sex (we do not know if it was unprotected or if the protection failed) and she is pregnant. She is accepting her mistake and is dealing with it without seeking sympathy or asking the government for help. AIDS victims (with the minor exception of those that get it from blood donations, rape, unfaithful spouse, etc.) get their disease from voluntary high-risk sexual activity. It is not right to discriminate against AIDS victims, but they have no right asking me, through taxation on my hard-earned income, to support their humungous medical bills or to give them other special consideration. Take the voluntary risk, accept the fate.

  84. #484
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 9:33 am, sbw999 said:

    Politics is a gutter business on both sides of the aisle.

  85. #485
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 9:33 am, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 8:35 am, lgm said:

    It seems to me that you get aids and pregnant doing more or less the same thing, having unprotected sex.

    Here’s where you went wrong: “It seems to me…” You get AIDS through anal intercourse and/or intravenous drug use (whether or not you’re wearing a condom when you shoot up). Understand now?

    Dolt.

  86. #486
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 9:33 am, HappyGene said:

    Larry King was creepy last night. The talking heads had themselves convinced Palin was about to booted off of the ticket.

    Changing topics
    Does this remind anyone else about McCain’s good parts.
    Bridget smear = Bristol smear
    Ticks off party leaders for fun = Ticks off party leaders for fun
    And even the bad parts
    Bipartisan element of Abscam = Troopergate
    I think McCain might be telling a deeper truth than I recognized, she may well be his political kindred sprit

  87. #487
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 9:41 am, HappyGene said:

    For what it’s worth Troopergate is the kind of problem an executive leader faces that does not exist in the senate. Pretend for a moment she didn’t do everything in her power to get the guy fired and he tasered another child or killed someone while drinking and driving in a patrol car. She would be vilified for keeping such a slug on her force when she knew what she knows (The evil of the guy isn’t even disputed in Kosland, but they would never defend a trooper or a taser).

  88. #488
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 9:44 am, nativeaz08 said:

    Nailed it Irish Rose. Here’s a post from a Clinton supporter:

    This thread about Governor Palin and the MSM reaction to both her candidacy and her daughter’s pregnancy, is a reminder that this country is extraordinarily condemning, puritanical and backward in it’s views. Our culture is extremely sexist, misogynistic and demands women and girls adhere to an impossible double standard for conduct. The reaction has shown that too many on the left and the right are guilty of this.

    This election has exposed wholesale vicious attitudes towards Senator Clinton and Governor Palin and to their daughters. It confirms that it isn’t about a “particular woman”, its about ALL WOMEN! Our society seeks to control all females, their sexuality, their reproductivity and narrowly proscribe and define their roles.

    Unlike any of the male candidates, our female candidates are scrutinized intensely for their fitness to hold office in terms of their attractiveness, youth, relationships to a powerful male, demeanor, attire, modesty, sexuality, degree of deference, child bearing status, marital status, motherhood, parenting skills. Anything else they do is secondary to that and subject to passing these essential “tests” first. No man is held to this standard.

    And the qualifications they do have for the jobs are immediately compared disfavorably to their male counterparts, even in areas where they have clearly achieved more. Are we in fundamentalist Iran, a world of Burkhas? No, but you know what? We have certainly proven beyond a doubt that we have a long way to go.

    The accusations that it is the Dems or the Republicans misses what is the obvious larger and more pressing problem. Intolerance is systemic across the spectrum, no matter what the political affiliation. It is clear from everything that has transpired during this election that sexism is an equal opportunity disease.

    God Bless Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin. If ever there was a fierce urgency, it is now.

  89. #489
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 10:20 am, Dan Lee said:

    Liberals use every form of media to entice children into early sex, theough music videos, music, movies like “Juno”, & television shows.

    Then, once they finally cave into the pressure to have sex that’s in large part created by the pop culture atmosphere that is created almost exclusively by liberals, they begin the process of selectively condemning anyone who they do not agree with, or who does not fully submit to their twisted social standards.

    It’s a cycle of enticement/condemnation, entice/condemn..

    Hmmm… Sounds like a popular figure mentioned in the bible..

    Wen’t by the name of SATAN..

  90. #490
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 10:40 am, vickisoup said:

    Obama said he’s “offended” by the discussion about Bristol Palin. He must be positively apoplectic by now. :shock:

  91. #491
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 10:50 am, JT said:

    Is the event of HS kids having a baby great news? No. But what’s done is done. Choosing to keep the baby is positive step 1. Raising a good kid is positive step 2.

    It happened to my sister in her early 20′s. She married the guy. My nephew is a cool, decent kid, and a pretty good baseball player. My sister briefly considered ending the pregnancy, because she and the Dad were really fighting at that point.

    Thankfully, she decided she was going to have the baby regardless and everything worked out in the end.

    Trig and Bristol is a family matter. I wish them well. Palin makes McCain stronger. I like her as person and her political acumen. She the most real of the three candidates.

  92. #492
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 10:57 am, DBNinKY said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 8:35 am, lgm said:

    It seems to me that you get aids and pregnant doing more or less the same thing, having unprotected sex.

    But there’s a major difference: pregnancy ends in a lifetime of happiness and joy; the other ends one’s life. There is no equating the two, regardless of the pathology.

  93. #493
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 11:35 am, MTConservative said:

    Clearly, the media and the Democrats want the news of Bristol’s pregnancy to harm Sarah Palin, and, by extension, harm the GOP. They want to divide the Republicans up on this matter and sow doubt within the GOP.

    I am sure that the Palin family has shed real tears over this matter, and I am sure Bristol has regrets.

    But, the Palins are going forward with their lives, and they are not going to abort the inconvenient baby. For that, I applaud them all.

    I approve of Sarah Palin as McCain’s veep, and I will vote for them. I will also make a donation to the campaign.

    Let us all stand by our ticket.

  94. #494
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 11:44 am, Irish Rose said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 11:35 am, MTConservative said:

    Clearly, the media and the Democrats want the news of Bristol’s pregnancy to harm Sarah Palin, and, by extension, harm the GOP. They want to divide the Republicans up on this matter and sow doubt within the GOP.

    I am sure that the Palin family has shed real tears over this matter, and I am sure Bristol has regrets.

    But, the Palins are going forward with their lives, and they are not going to abort the inconvenient baby. For that, I applaud them all.

    I approve of Sarah Palin as McCain’s veep, and I will vote for them. I will also make a donation to the campaign.

    Let us all stand by our ticket.

    Very well stated, and I concur.
    My vote is still going to McCain/Palin.

  95. #495
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 12:20 pm, Irish Rose said:

    Charles over at LGF is reporting that Markos over at KOS is sending some of his diaries down the memory hole.

  96. #496
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 2:28 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    Check out the date on this picture – Sarah doesn’t look 8 months pregnant:

    http://www.daylife.com/photo/0fcQ5EM7gafd9

  97. #497
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:40 pm, Scooter36 said:

    Fornication is still a sin.

  98. #498
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 5:32 pm, whoozit said:

    I think Gov. Palin is forging a new trail for her daughters and everyone else’s daughters in the U.S.A.
    I’m thrilled to see a a strong, intelligent, steadfast woman in the media. She won’t be discouraged by silly little remarks. Keep on keepin on, Gov. Palin!

  99. #499
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 6:17 pm, DaveCal said:

    Michelle,

    Maybe you can look into whether any of the “O” organization is behind the hype over Gov. Palin’s Daughter’s pregnancy. Barry O denies any of his folks are involved, and claims he’ll fire anyone who was….

    Link Here:

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/01/obama.palin/index.html

    “Our people were not involved in any way in this, and they will not be. And if I ever thought that there was somebody in my campaign that was involved in something like that, they’d be fired.”

    I wonder if they issued a memo/email like the one that generated so much anti-buzz over the Annenburg Challenge documents and the radio appearance of Stanley Kurtz.

  100. #500
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 7:24 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:40 pm, Scooter36 said:

    Fornication is still a sin.

    Double sin if it produces a little scooter.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Choosing Life and Beating the Odds

February 11, 2012 11:50 AM by Doug Powers

32 Comments

‘To Stop the Multiplication of the Unfit’

February 10, 2012 09:06 AM by Michelle Malkin

199 Comments

First, they came for the Catholics

January 31, 2012 10:51 PM by Michelle Malkin

181 Comments

The March for Life 2012

January 23, 2012 10:21 AM by Michelle Malkin

132 Comments

Shredding Kathleen Sebelius

October 28, 2011 10:03 AM by Michelle Malkin

155 Comments

Joe Biden ‘Fully Understands’ China’s ‘Millions of Children Left Behind’ Policy

August 22, 2011 07:01 PM by Doug Powers

59 Comments

But it’s unsustainable

The victims of nationalized health care

July 5, 2011 02:04 PM by Michelle Malkin

123 Comments


Categories: Abortion

Redstate

» Media Matters
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook