See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Crazy uncles…what’s one to do? « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
2. Watching Jeremiah Wright | Democrat=Socialist
3. A Different “9/11 Truth” « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)
4. Look Who Crawled Out From Under The Bus « The Vast Global Zionist Conspiracy v 5.0
5. Obama’s Goddamn Pastor Has Arisen And Looks To have Taken Over The Bus | Right Voices
6. Newsflash: Baracks Racist, Rantin, Reverend is still a piece of trash! « The Daley Gator
7. Obama's Former Spiritual Mentor Of 20 Years, Jeremiah Wright, Resurfaces | Stuck On Stupid
8. Babalu Blog

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

101. #101
     On September 1st, 2008 at 10:44 pm, simcoe said:

     Consider:

     When a racist KKK gets up to speak at a rally (notice they have to call a rally to gather a crowd) there may be a dozen or maybe up to a few dozen hanging around to listen. Most white people know these guys are marginal.

     However, Wright is invited to spew his vile racist venom by large organized groups of people for large sums of money. And in Chicago he grew one of the largest followings in the country with his hatred.

     When one goes to hear Wright spew they know ahead of time exactly what they are in for and the kind of vocal, smelly, landfill refuse they will hear, yet they flock to him in droves. What, besides the color of his skin, makes him any different from the KKK speaker?

     So, who are the racists?

102. #102
     On September 1st, 2008 at 11:47 pm, Vntnrse said:

     The blog does belong to Michelle and we comment only at her pleasure. That being said, I don’t particularly care for the title either.

     However I do say, THANK YOU MICHELLE for allowing us to comment.

103. #103
     On September 2nd, 2008 at 2:29 am, gayle said:

     BTW, I am not a dude, dude.

104. #104
     On September 2nd, 2008 at 8:00 pm, need2voice said:

     As a christian, I am quite disturbed by the language of this page. It is a sin to use the lords name in vain, this is the second commandment - THOU SHALL NOT TAKE THE NAME OF THE LORD THY GOD IN VAIN. Perhaps trying to get your point across should have been worded a little differently Michelle.

105. #105
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:44 am, Fed Up said:

     Michelle,

     Whatever happened to “Thou shall not take the Lord’s name in vain?” The title of your article and even the posting of the image of the lady with the sign are in violation of this commandment.

     To think you were a keynote speaker at Coral Ridge???

     If I’m banned for criticizing your use of God’s name in vain, so be it.

     Just thought you should be reminded of His truth as written in the good book.

106. #106
     On September 4th, 2008 at 1:51 pm, guspapa said:

     What part of journalistic direct quotes are we expected to edit out of public discourse? Make nice with BHO or what ever your intended criticism is intended to convey does not change the facts, just the facts Mam

107. #107
     On September 5th, 2008 at 4:10 pm, Tommygun said:

     need2voice, Fed Up, and any other “Christians”:

     You are such good Christian folks to cover up for the enemy. But perhaps you might want to read the book you tout:

     For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Walk as children of light (for the fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness, righteousness, and truth), finding out what is acceptable to the Lord. And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them. For it is shameful even to speak of those things which are done by them in secret. But all things that are exposed are made manifest by the light, for whatever makes manifest is light.

     Ephesians 5:8-14 (New King James Version)

     Just an idea.

108. #108
     On September 6th, 2008 at 1:49 pm, havok said:

     All…I am agnostic but yet understand your objections to your lord’s name being taken in vain. However, let’s not allow any religion to get in the way of facts. Facts support what J. Wright is and does…let’s keep it in print. I know many Christians and J. Wright is NOT one of them. Keep the pressure on Michelle.

Comment pages: « 1 [2]