Goddamn! Jeremiah’s back

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 1, 2008 11:42 AM

Rev. Wright’s mouth is open again — and it’s Goddamning Barack and Michelle Obama with faint praise. Bitter much?

Via the NYPost:

TOLEDO, Ohio – The Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama’s fiery ex-pastor, re-emerged yesterday with a crude reference about race and sex in the White House.

“This ordinary boy [Obama] just might be the first president in the history of the United States to have a black woman sleeping at 1600 Pennsylvania legally,” Wright said, referring to Michelle Obama, in a sermon at the Wheeler Avenue Baptist Church in Houston.

It was unclear whether Wright was making a reference to prostitution, to old miscegenation laws, or to the history of illicit interracial sex under slavery.

Wright’s remarks yesterday were full of praise for Obama – although several times, he referred to Obama as a “boy” who later developed into an extraordinary person, through God’s work and, presumably, Wright’s guidance.

***

Flashback…the San Fran Wright Fan Club…

1damn.jpg

Photo credit: Protest Shooter

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:45 am, Jim M. said:

    Jeremiah Wright – the gift that keeps on giving.

  2. #2
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:46 am, zorro said:

    God damn! Jeremiah’s back

    Hallelujah!

  3. #3
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:46 am, Defector01 said:

    Wright time, Wright place

  4. #4
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:46 am, Goldwater Knight said:

    Wow. It’s getting interesting.

  5. #5
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:46 am, Paul-Cincy said:

    Michelle, is the GD title really necessary.

  6. #6
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:47 am, guitarplayer said:

    He’s a RACIST!!! Oh wait, it’s Rev. Wright. Nevermind. All is well.

  7. #7
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:47 am, Anita said:

    Ha! The great O want to keep him in Ghana & he is here? Why MSM not reporting this with alerts?

  8. #8
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:49 am, Paul-Cincy said:

    Rev. Wright drags down Obama whenever he opens his mouth. In one of those real-time graphs of audience approval, the line heads for the basement every time.

  9. #9
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:50 am, maine yankee said:

    GET BACK UNDER THE BUS !!

    GET UNDER THE BUS !!

    GOD **** IT, GET BACK UNDER THE D*&^% BUS !!

  10. #10
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:51 am, jtex said:

    .

    If Obama should win the election, don’t be too terribly surprised if Rev. Wright should get appointed to some kind of post.
    As far as Wright saying that Obama going from a boy to an extraordinary person, seems that the Rev. Wright has done just the opposite, he has gone from a decent person (when he was a Marine) to being just another turd, a smelly one at that.

    .

  11. #11
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:52 am, jtex said:

    .

    Let’s all hope that the Rev. Wright keeps running his mouth ’cause he ain’t doin’ Obama any favors. He might be doin’ the Repubs. a favor but not Obama.

    .

  12. #12
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:53 am, KCK said:

    Rather a filthy mind for a preacher, eh?

  13. #13
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:55 am, Goldwater Knight said:

    AIP and Jeremiah Wright: The Nuclear Powered Swiftboat.

  14. #14
    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:58 am, twofoot said:

    I swear he is trying to torpedo Obamas campaign. The timing is just to perfect. A few short days after McCain does something to actually energize conservatives by naming Gov Palin, Wright shows up again to remind us of Obamas “church” history?

    Not to sound like a conspiracy nut, but it just fits to well. Wright can’t have Obama win the presidency. If he did, people would question the racist schtick. If Obama loses, Wright can go on preaching about what a racist county we are.

  15. #15
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:01 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    If Obama should win the election, don’t be too terribly surprised if Rev. Wright should get appointed to some kind of post.

    I’m sure he’d probably be the one holding the Bible during the swearing in ceremony.

  16. #16
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:05 pm, ErinF said:

    America’s chicken… has come home… to ROOST!

  17. #17
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:06 pm, Milwaukee Mike said:

    Heeeees baaaaaack! He-he-he-he-he!

  18. #18
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:06 pm, jtex said:

    .

    For anyone wondering why Obama selected Biden for his running mate, well, when he loses the election he now has an “old white man” to blame. He didn’t select him for his experience. He’s covering all his bases.

    .

  19. #19
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:06 pm, shooter said:

    Seems like Geraldo the SPITTER has been going to that despicable church…..he uttered the same GD on LIVE T.V. just about 11:20 am (eastern) today.

  20. #20
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:07 pm, Paul-Cincy said:

    BlameAmericaLast said:

    I’m sure he’d probably be the one holding the Bible during the swearing in ceremony.

    “G– D— America, it’s in the bible!” — Rev JW

  21. #21
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:08 pm, ErinF said:

    If Obambi wins, I’m afraid every state of the union speech is going to sound like a wright sermon. Ugghhh!

  22. #22
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:09 pm, ajmontana said:

    Ha! shooter I heard that, he got all excited over a worker in the water.
    He’s Still waiting for the Million dollar story.
    flippin tool.

  23. #23
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:12 pm, Ron said:

    Oh please, please, please, please, please keep talking, Jeremiah. Oh thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you! Just keep spewing, Reverend, and remind us all about your most famous parishioner and his training under you sure guiding hand.

  24. #24
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:13 pm, shooter said:

    I wondered if they could silence Wright until November. Didn’t think they could.

    NEXT?
    Michelle OBitter One, your turn.

    (the RNC, or someone -i.e. 527′s, better have some film they’re planning to run showcasing America’s least favorite pastor)

    What do you call obama?
    A TARGET RICH environment.

  25. #25
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:15 pm, Paul-Cincy said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:06 pm, shooter said:
    Seems like Geraldo the SPITTER has been going to that despicable church…..he uttered the same GD on LIVE T.V. just about 11:20 am (eastern) today.

    Michelle has put in a very offensive headline, it is really beneath her. It’s on the same level as the grossest epithets of bodily excretion, rape and other violent and perverted sex, murder, rage, and mutilation, the most base racial slurs, lies, and innuendo. I could make up a nice collage of them here but I won’t! I’m not even a religious person, but I recognize what’s patently offensive to many people. Even Wright said right after “G– D— America”, “It’s in the bible!”, as if to say “I’m not saying it, I’m just quoting!”. Shouldn’t conservatives maintain a level of decency above liberals? We know the effects of a degradation of the culture.

  26. #26
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:15 pm, FamilyMan said:

    It’s Rev. Wright. Let it go. Our ticket won’t get the hard core black vote, the anti gun vote, pro abortion vote or the veggie vote. That leaves 70% of the country.

  27. #27
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:16 pm, shooter said:

    he got all excited over a worker in the water.

    Everyone on the planet knew the guy was a worker, except Spitter Geraldo.
    He made it sound like the guy was in the biggest whirlpool of death ever witnessed on the planet. What a loser loon.

  28. #28
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:16 pm, walterc said:

    twofoot said:
    I swear he is trying to torpedo Obamas campaign.

    That’s been my thinking. Wright, Jacskon, (not too)Sharpton, will all be out of business if Obama wins.

    So keep up the good work Rev.

    This guy gives preachers a bad name.

  29. #29
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:22 pm, DesertLover said:

    OT … Breaking News …

    FNC just reported that Sarah Palin has announced that her 17 year old daughter is pregnant and will be marrying the baby’s father …

  30. #30
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:23 pm, Larry L. Sharp said:

    Rev. Wright is an Obamanation! That makes two in the messiah’s campaign who walk on water. The water must be awfully hard for Jeremiah and the big O to walk on it. From the sound of their ungodly diabtribes it’s probably sewer water they’re walking on.

  31. #31
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:23 pm, shooter said:

    I wish our Michelle hadn’t gone with that headline as well. I don’t think she would even say it out loud.
    It just isn’t needed nor does it help.

  32. #32
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:26 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    FNC just reported that Sarah Palin has announced that her 17 year old daughter is pregnant and will be marrying the baby’s father …

    Yep heard that too. Now there’s more fodder for the loony left.

  33. #33
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:30 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Here’s the story about it:

    McCain officials said the news of the daughter’s pregnancy was being released to rebut what one aide called “mud-slinging and lies” circulating on liberal blog sites.

    According to these rumors, Sarah Palin had faked a pregnancy and pretended to have given birth in May to her fifth child, a son named Trig who has Down syndrome. The rumor was that Trig was actually Bristol Palin’s child and that Sarah Palin was the grandmother.

    A senior McCain campaign official said the McCain camp was appalled that these rumors had not only been spread around liberal blog sites and partisan Democrats, but also were the subject of heightened interest from mainstream news media.

    “The despicable rumors that have been spread by liberal blogs, some even with Barack Obama’s name in them, is a real anchor around the Democratic ticket, pulling them down in the mud in a way that certainly juxtaposes themselves against their ‘campaign of change,’” a senior aide said.

  34. #34
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:32 pm, Paul-Cincy said:

    FNC just reported that Sarah Palin has announced that her 17 year old daughter is pregnant and will be marrying the baby’s father …

    If she raises the baby as a single mother and goes on food stamps and other govt assistance then the left will love her, if they are consistent.

  35. #35
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:33 pm, nyc123me said:

    So.. Michelle Obama is now to be known as The President’s Slut?
    Nice one Reverend Wright, you’re a real class act.

  36. #36
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:39 pm, Cogs said:

    Wright can say any silly thing he wants. No matter how outlandish, the MSM will never report it.

  37. #37
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:41 pm, Trollman said:

    Please, Michelle Malkin, cut the GD title. Taking the Lord’s Name in vain isn’t funny. Leave that to the Left.

  38. #38
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:46 pm, atheling said:

    I don’t like the headline either.

    It does the the Lord’s name in vain, and even if you are not a Christian, Michelle, some of us are, and it is offensive.

  39. #39
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:47 pm, atheling said:

    Ooops, “take” should be there.

  40. #40
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:52 pm, Speakup said:

    “This ordinary boy [Obama] just might be the first president in the history of the United States to have a black woman sleeping at 1600 Pennsylvania legally,” Wright said

    I can’t imagine or don’t dare consider the moral equivalence of that statement.

  41. #41
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:54 pm, MrScribbler said:

    Gotta stand up for Michelle (M, not O) here.

    Let he who is without verbal sin cast the first stone.

    The headline is appropriate. Shock value, and all that.

  42. #42
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:56 pm, RhymesWithRight said:

    Interestingly enough, the Houston Chronicle couldn’t be troubled to report the controversial comment you cited.

    http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/272097.php

  43. #43
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:56 pm, MrOlympia said:

    They had Bibles in Rev Wright’s church? Hmmmm, I thought they had BLT Quran?

    Obummer, if elected, will put his hand on Quran?

  44. #44
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:57 pm, Speakup said:

    Paul-Cincy

    If we’re not strong enough to identify the issue, we’re not going to be strong enough to fix the issue.

  45. #45
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:57 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    The headline is appropriate. Shock value, and all that.

    It is in this case, considering the subject matter at hand.

  46. #46
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:58 pm, Craig said:

    It was unclear whether Wright was making a reference to prostitution, to old miscegenation laws, or to the history of illicit interracial sex under slavery.

    With Thomas Jefferson, I suspect he meant the latter.

  47. #47
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:58 pm, Dianah111 said:

    I agree about the headline not being good. Cheapens the website. If I wanted to see this word…which I don’t…I would go to lefty websites!

  48. #48
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:02 pm, TimothyJ said:

    I would swear that I heard those comments quite a few months ago. It was stupid then, and it’s stupid now. God Bless you JW!

  49. #49
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:08 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Yes this is the gift that keeps on giving and as a partisan I should be grateful, but I am more afraid and alarmed. Jeremiah Wright is just one of a multitude of black activist/Black Supremacist who stone by stone, block by block is undoing two generations of progress in race relations. Thousands of people, perhaps millions, who have never used a racial slur or degraded a black person now are and do so routinely.

    I have seen the deterioration since the Rodney King riots followed by the OJ Simpson acquittal and the black reaction to it. Tell people enough times “we are coming for you, no justice no peace” and they begin to wonder just how broad that feeling is.

    Obama’s Typical White Person
    Michelle’s America is just plain mean
    Jeremiah Wright continuous
    Jessie Jackson
    Al Sharpton
    Nation of Islam
    Bloods and Crips
    Maxine Waters and the Black Caucus

    We have to wonder: Just what is the sense in trying if nothing we do is going to help? The black rage builds- murder, rape, robbery, looting, arson and rioting are all justified as reparations? Billions of dollars spent on Food Stamps, Aid to Dependent Children, housing assistance has been successful in exactly one area- it has subsidized a whole new generation of of black rage. Personally I hold the White Guilt Cult at fault but it is the young black thugs I fear.

    Yes “Goddamn! Jeremiah’s back” is the gift that keeps on giving. But I have to a large degree given up on the situation ever getting better. If, God help us, there is ever a race war I plan to go after White Liberals and some of my Latino activists cousins. They are the most guilty.

    Hey Obama-What to see Bitter?
    Look at your wife.

    WE SHOULD BE CIVIL-WE CONSERVATIVES?
    Not a chance.

  50. #50
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:10 pm, teachem2 said:

    Let ol’ JW spew his hate however and wherever he wants. He’s just sabotaging Obama whether byb design or not. I happen to think it’s by design because Obama threw him under the bus. Sure, praise him to the high heavens above, but throw in enough hate speech to turn everyone off. Generally, by this point in the election cycle, the earlier scandals are worn out, but here he is creating all new quotes for everyone to repeat.

    I say buy him some airtime!

  51. #51
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:11 pm, oldedude said:

    Hmmm…is that good for her kids to be hearing?

  52. #52
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:17 pm, Send_Me said:

    “Let not many of you become teachers, my brethren, knowing that as such we will incur a stricter judgment.” James 3:1

  53. #53
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:20 pm, Speakup said:

    With Thomas Jefferson, I suspect he meant the latter.

    Actually TJ’s brother, according to PBS DNA results from a show I watched a while back.

  54. #54
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:21 pm, jegjr said:

    Palin + Jeremiah = less than no bounce.

  55. #55
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:23 pm, Conservatives R Us said:

    That was a useless story and I agree, I find it offensive to use GD, even if he did, why give him any attention and belittle yourself? Repeating the use of God’s Name in vain isn’t right.

  56. #56
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:23 pm, BemusedLib said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:56 pm, MrOlympia said:

    They had Bibles in Rev Wright’s church? Hmmmm, I thought they had BLT Quran?

    Obummer, if elected, will put his hand on Quran?

    Owimpia speaks!

    Paranoid much? Or just misinformed.

    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:22 pm, DesertLover said:

    OT … Breaking News …

    FNC just reported that Sarah Palin has announced that her 17 year old daughter is pregnant and will be marrying the baby’s father …

    So much for abstinence only sex education.

  57. #57
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:26 pm, gollumclone said:

    What would Jeremiah spew about Palin’s teen daughter being pregnant? We know that Obambi would not want his own daughters “punished” for being pregnant..off to the abortion clinic for them! I see the fever swamp is going nuts with the story, but big lying ass/terrorist-racist preacher-crooked rezno embracing OBama’s own mama was pregnant out of wedlock with him.

  58. #58
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:29 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:11 pm, oldedude said:

    Hmmm…is that good for her kids to be hearing?

    They have been hearing in in Old Jerry’s Church since they were born–but we are hateful for mentioning it. Obviously that is the message their parents want them to hear.
    I do wonder: what is the sense of trying?

    Hey Obama-What to see Bitter?
    Look at your wife.

    WE SHOULD BE CIVIL-WE CONSERVATIVES?
    Not a chance.

  59. #59
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:31 pm, Trollman said:

    MrScribbler said:

    Gotta stand up for Michelle (M, not O) here.

    Let he who is without verbal sin cast the first stone.

    The headline is appropriate. Shock value, and all that.

    That is a misuse of John 8:7 “He who is without sin among you, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.” Jesus isn’t saying that you can only condemn a person if you are sinless. If He did, He would be contradicting the Law of Moses which commands people (who are themselves sinners) to stone people for committing certain sins. Jesus explicitly said that nothing He said or did contradicted the Law of Moses (Matthew 5:17-19).

    What Jesus said was in regard to casting the first stone. A person was only to be put to death at the eyewitness testimony of 2 or 3 witnesses. Those eyewitnesses were to cast the first stones, followed by the rest of the people (Deuteronomy 17:2-7).

    Anyone who cast the first stone could come under investigation themselves. There were rules for testifying in a death penalty case (Exodus 23:1-2, 7; Deuteronomy 19:15-21).

    They could be taken to court themselves, and if any funny business was found by the judges, the eyewitnesses – those casting the first stone – could be put to death themselves.

    So when Jesus pointed this out, they left, the oldest leaving first (presumably, the oldest were the ringleaders who set up the whole thing). That this “trial” was a sham was obvious since there was only the woman. When adultery was committed, you were to stone both the man and the woman. What Jesus was saying was, if you can testify against her without sinning, then go right ahead.

    Since there wasn’t even one witness, much less the required 2-3 witnesses, then the Law of Moses said you were not to stone such a person. Jesus didn’t forgive the woman, He merely upheld what the Law of Moses taught.

    And no, I do not take the Lord’s Name in vain. Not even for a “snappy” title.

  60. #60
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:32 pm, Ulthwithian said:

    I must agree in stating that the headline is rather distasteful. There are any number of ways to put that headline so as to not offend the Christians among us (myself included), and yet point out the facts.

  61. #61
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:32 pm, FireBlogger said:

    Perfect timing Rev. Wright!

    Great time to come out from hiding to remind everyone who Barry and Michelle’s religious mentor of 20 years was.

    We’ll need command performance from you on Nov.3.

    Thanks in advance.

  62. #62
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:34 pm, ProtestShooter said:

    I have trouble wrapping my head around the idea that anybody could listen to this guy for years on end and take him seriously. I wonder if he started out less crazy and everybody kind of eased into it together.

  63. #63
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:35 pm, atheling said:

    The headline could have been:

    G*ddamn!

    I don’t see why it had to be so explicit and irreverent.

    Some things are sacred and transcend political expediency.

  64. #64
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:36 pm, atheling said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:32 pm, Ulthwithian said:

    I must agree in stating that the headline is rather distasteful. There are any number of ways to put that headline so as to not offend the Christians among us (myself included), and yet point out the facts.

    Not only Christians, but our Jewish friends as well.

    Really, Michelle, I’m disappointed.

  65. #65
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:38 pm, Bob in Myrtle Beach said:

    Oh Man! Someone give that man a megaphone and his own primetime show…It could even be sponsored by the RNC, he’s too good to be true.

  66. #66
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:43 pm, rambler said:

    What took him so long? I knew he couldn’t contain himself. Just snatching back the limelight. Obama sure knows how to pick his friends!

  67. #67
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:51 pm, i b squidly said:

    Thou shall not take the Lord’s name in vain concerns someone rising to the pulpit and falsely holding forth the word of God. Wright bears false witness and covets his neighbor’s goods pretending to speak for the Lord. There’s your violation of the commandment (or three) not the use of an irreverent aphorism.

  68. #68
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:53 pm, JDinTX said:

    I wonder is Barack Husein is mad at the Rev for calling him boy. That used to be “fighting words” for most blacks.

  69. #69
    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:56 pm, sandyb said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:23 pm, BemusedLib said:
    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:56 pm, MrOlympia said:

    They had Bibles in Rev Wright’s church? Hmmmm, I thought they had BLT Quran?

    Obummer, if elected, will put his hand on Quran?
    Owimpia speaks!

    Paranoid much? Or just misinformed.

    Whether B-O goes to the mosque or not, there’s plenty of evidence he has a soft spot — at the very least — for Islam. For example, the NYT itself, reported on The One entering an editor’s office reciting the evening call to prayer in Arabic, saying it was one of the most beautiful things he has ever heard.

    In the recorded version of one of his books, The One mentions how mischievous he was in “Koranic Studies” class in Indonesia.

    Also, a connection in US Intel says that the Indonesian school The One attended was a hard-core madrassa, not the innocent experience he makes it out to be.

    I have also read that the Rev. J Wright is a former Muslim, though I don’t know how that could be, since the penalty for “quitting” is death. So, we’ve got all of the above as well as Louis Farrakhan on the cover of J. Wright’s church publication. I’ll leave you to decide…

  70. #70
    On September 1st, 2008 at 2:01 pm, gollumclone said:

    Anyone care to guess how many of the Hollywood glitterati are pregnant without benefit of marriage? Plenty of them never even bother with the marriage bit at all.

    My own mother-in-law was a Mennonite and managed to get pregnant in 1940. The father married her soon enough.

    What were those rumors about Mary Jo Kopechne being pregnant at the time of her death? And let’s not forget how the Kennedys’ had Rosemary lobotomized and kept out of the public eye.
    http://fatboy.cc/ But of course liberals will viciously attack conservatives to strive to contain any more slippage in the polls on uh, uh, Obumbler’s part. Now- will Obamba allow his past associations and crooked dealings to be aired or is free speech not applicable to critics of dems?

  71. #71
    On September 1st, 2008 at 2:06 pm, simcoe said:

    Jeremiah Wright is a A hateful, bigoted, racist leach sucking as much of his kind’a nourishment as he can out of racism. Of the same ilk as Jackson and Sharpton. They need racism to survive and they give the racists what they want to hear.

    If you think there is something wrong in your life, its not your fault, its because of those people over there. If there weren’t any racism in this country these people would create it, the same way Hitler fanned hatred for Jews.

  72. #72
    On September 1st, 2008 at 2:08 pm, smatchett said:

    Diarrhea of the mouth! How did Obama go to his church all those years?!

  73. #73
    On September 1st, 2008 at 2:13 pm, Trollman said:

    i b squidly said:

    Thou shall not take the Lord’s name in vain concerns someone rising to the pulpit and falsely holding forth the word of God. Wright bears false witness and covets his neighbor’s goods pretending to speak for the Lord. There’s your violation of the commandment (or three) not the use of an irreverent aphorism.

    Using “God” as a common curse word and for shock value is a misuse of the Lord’s Name. We already knew Jeremiah Wright was a filthy man, but this reflects on Michelle Malkin.

  74. #74
    On September 1st, 2008 at 2:34 pm, sfcmac said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 11:46 am, Paul-Cincy said:
    Michelle, is the GD title really necessary.

    Hell, it’s necessary because it’s accurate.

  75. #75
    On September 1st, 2008 at 2:37 pm, sfcmac said:

    trollman:

    In this day and age of Islamofascist terrorism, and the prospect of a socialist with radical friends and associates getting into the White House, you have much more to worry about than the use of “God Damn”.

  76. #76
    On September 1st, 2008 at 2:47 pm, dakine said:

    It’s called satire folks.

  77. #77
    On September 1st, 2008 at 3:24 pm, lgm said:

    Maybe Wright is referring to Sally Hemmings, the slave of Thomas Jefferson who was the mother of some of his children.

  78. #78
    On September 1st, 2008 at 3:28 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    I seriously want to know what William Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, and Barack Hussein Obama knew about the 9/11 attacks, and when they knew it.

    A Different “9/11 Truth”

  79. #79
    On September 1st, 2008 at 3:33 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Diarrhea of the mouth! How did Obama go to his church all those years?!

    I believe we’re still waiting for that answer.

  80. #80
    On September 1st, 2008 at 3:35 pm, Trollman said:

    sfcmac:
    In this day and age of Islamofascist terrorism, and the prospect of a socialist with radical friends and associates getting into the White House, you have much more to worry about than my posts criticizing MM’s title.

    Get the irony?

  81. #81
    On September 1st, 2008 at 3:49 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 12:08 pm, ErinF said:

    If Obambi wins, I’m afraid every state of the union speech is going to sound like a wright sermon. Ugghhh!

    more like the ranting and raving of Nikita Khrushchev…

  82. #82
    On September 1st, 2008 at 4:14 pm, right_on said:

    Obama listened to Wright and other guest clerics for 20 years, and heard no anti-white racism being preached? Let me just remind everyone that he “investigated” this church before he became a member of it’s congregation. It is beyond the realm of credulity to believe he didn’t know this church practiced Black Liberation Theology.

    Liberation Theology is an attempt to interpret Scripture through the plight of the poor. It is largely a humanistic doctrine. It started in South America in the turbulent 1950s when Marxism was making great gains among the poor because of its emphasis on the redistribution of wealth, allowing poor peasants to share in the wealth of the colonial elite and thus upgrade their economic status in life. As a theology, it has very strong Roman Catholic roots.

    We now have Black Liberation Theology being preached in the black community. It is the same Marxist, revolutionary, humanistic philosophy found in South American Liberation Theology and has no more claim for a scriptural basis than the South American model has. False doctrine is still false, no matter how it is dressed up or what fancy name is attached to it. In the same way that revolutionary fervor was stirred up in South America, Liberation Theology is now trying to stir up revolutionary fervor among blacks in America.

  83. #83
    On September 1st, 2008 at 4:20 pm, beenthere said:

    Jumping Gee Willickers, people. Maybe the headline should have read “Hotdamn!” or put the offending phrase in quotes. It’s Wright’s signature phrase after all. It/he just wouldn’t be the same without it.

    BTW, the good reverend has a book coming out very soon now, or so I have been told. His reappearance may be nothing more than a publicity stunt (no doubt one of many to come), to jump start his book tour.

    Finally, truth be told I kind of like the reverend. I know he wouldn’t like me, but the man is honest and that counts for something. He doesn’t back down, and his comment about Obama: “He’s a politician. That’s what politicians do” is solid political gold. It’s the best summation of the Mighty “O” yet and may never be bested.

  84. #84
    On September 1st, 2008 at 4:26 pm, RedRepub said:

    Yay!!!!!

    Rev. Wright escaped!!!!!!

    Where were there keeping him anyway???

  85. #85
    On September 1st, 2008 at 4:44 pm, beenthere said:

    In the same way that revolutionary fervor was stirred up in South America, Liberation Theology is now trying to stir up revolutionary fervor among blacks in America.

    Liberation theologists aren’t just trying. They’re doing it! Been doing it for decades! And they’ve been doing a very good job. That’s why there will be hell to pay no matter what happens in November. As far as race relations are concerned, I can no longer begin to guess which will be worse, nor if there will be any way to tell: an Obama victory or an Obama defeat.

  86. #86
    On September 1st, 2008 at 6:16 pm, BruceB said:

    Was it when BO was sworn into the Ill. senate or the us senate that he used the Quarn instead of the bible to be sworn in?

  87. #87
    On September 1st, 2008 at 6:45 pm, Rob said:

    Liberation Theology

    Isn’t that what Moses taught?

  88. #88
    On September 1st, 2008 at 6:58 pm, gayle said:

    I too wait for Michelle to change the title.

    It is offensive for a conservative blog to post God’s name in vain, even repeating another person’s words.

    We are above that here….so I thought.

    We reap what we sow.

  89. #89
    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:11 pm, TMoney said:

    I refuse to believe that Wright was ever ‘thrown under the bus.’ It just don’t make sense. Obama knew the issues and knew what kind of crap Wright was shoveling.

    Wright may have rolled under the bus for his star pupil for a few moments, but he rolled out from the other side and will be back in the good graces of Michelle’s kids very soon.

  90. #90
    On September 1st, 2008 at 7:13 pm, Flyover State said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 1:08 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:
    Yes this is the gift that keeps on giving and as a partisan I should be grateful, but I am more afraid and alarmed. Jeremiah Wright is just one of a multitude of black activist/Black Supremacist who stone by stone, block by block is undoing two generations of progress in race relations.

    I agree. The temporary benefitto a campaign is far outweighed by the permanent damage.

  91. #91
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:04 pm, dakine said:

    It’s called satire gayle…lighten up.

    RedPill, whatever it is that is wrong with you is no small thing brah…you are a seriously troubled individual.

  92. #92
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:09 pm, gayle said:

    There is no satire in taking God’s name in vain…..either in print or verbally.

  93. #93
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:26 pm, dakine said:

    Start your own blog then gayle.

  94. #94
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:31 pm, cactusjoe said:

    I also must voice my displeasure at the use God’s name in vain. And while we are discussing this issue, I am also tired of seeing that women with the sign that uses God’s name in vain.

    In this time of trouble, I suggest that it is good to appeal to God’s mercy, rather than insulting Him.

  95. #95
    On September 1st, 2008 at 8:51 pm, gayle said:

    I guess some folks don’t believe in the 10 commandments huh?

  96. #96
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:17 pm, Leatherneck said:

    Wright has some serious issues. It is so easy to hate, and much harder to love.

    In the Marine Corp we were all green. Some dark green, and some light green. We also had s##t birds in the Marine Corp. Wright should bow his head in shame for being a s##t bird.

    Over

  97. #97
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:24 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    What if we said, “AllahDamn!” Is that kosher?

  98. #98
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:28 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    If it’s OK for Patton it’s OK for me.

  99. #99
    On September 1st, 2008 at 9:57 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On September 1st, 2008 at 6:45 pm, Rob said:

    Liberation Theology

    Isn’t that what Moses taught?

    No, it wasn’t.

  100. #100
    On September 1st, 2008 at 10:18 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    gayle said:

    I guess some folks don’t believe in the 10 commandments huh?

    Dude, you’re giving the decalogue a lame tone.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Nancy Pelosi Explains Why Obama Flip-Flopped on Super PACs

February 9, 2012 10:08 PM by Doug Powers

50 Comments

Stealth altruism

Former Democrat Rep. Regrets Vote for Obamacare Due to Contraceptive Coverage

February 7, 2012 03:40 PM by Doug Powers

75 Comments

She wasn’t kidding

Accents, politics, and double standards

February 6, 2012 11:19 AM by Michelle Malkin

129 Comments

Hiring Spree in NYC

February 1, 2012 02:47 PM by Doug Powers

43 Comments

Mr. and Mrs. Cranky Pants

January 27, 2012 10:35 AM by Michelle Malkin

138 Comments

Stimulus-Backed ‘Green’ Bankruptcy of the Week: Ener1

January 26, 2012 03:06 PM by Doug Powers

67 Comments

Battery maker on verge of going terminals-up

Obama and Jan Brewer Have Words on Airport Tarmac; Update: Brewer Book Sales Skyrocket

January 25, 2012 09:54 PM by Doug Powers

165 Comments

Book-Critic-in-Chief takes issue


Categories: Barack Obama,Race Hustlers

Babalu Blog

» Greece is Burning

Betsys Page

» Cruising the Web
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook