See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Russ. Just Russ.

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

101. #101
     On September 2nd, 2008 at 11:54 pm, Gwillie said:

     I noticed that the racist comments are up and the ones that seem to defend Michelle are quickly deleted,
     How do I know they defend her? I read the replies like “Michelle is that you???” and “Welcome to DU! So glad you joined to stand up for Michelle!11111″ and “LMAO”

102. #102
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:35 am, alaskangrizzly said:

     On September 2nd, 2008 at 11:54 pm, Gwillie said:

     I noticed that the racist comments are up and the ones that seem to defend Michelle are quickly deleted,
     How do I know they defend her? I read the replies like “Michelle is that you???” and “Welcome to DU! So glad you joined to stand up for Michelle!11111″ and “LMAO”

     And yet leftists can post here all they want and make insults. Perhaps MJ needs to head over to DU with her hypocrisy claims since they don’t allow any conservative dissent over there at all.

103. #103
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:55 am, emjem24 said:

     Exactly. At gunpoint. Wait, I don’t have a daughter. Oh well, if I did I’d encourage her to get knocked up just so that she could kill it. Fun times for all.

     Wow. Nice to know liberal, one issue voters (besides gun control) continue to stay classy.

     Yes I encourage it. When does your hubby come back? I’ll have a loogy ready.

     Just stating the examples of left-wing rage at work. I’m amazed that, yet again, being a liberal woman isn’t idiot proof.

     Liar. Find a quote.
     Bug off. You’re a joke.

     That’s some hollow engagement there. Feminism really is inverted. You once ran off a list of your most cherished liberal core beliefs and one of them was decidedly against owning a gun and worshipping at the altar of baby killers. Infanticide is best. Less is more. Population control is the new birth control policy of the Dem party. Ring any bells?

     MM insults and calls names on a regualar basis. She can take some in return, and like it.

     Smarmy and snarky are insults? I would say Michelle is voicing the personality traits of two machine-trained, liberal politicians, one from Chicago, one from DE and both know all about the Dem’s whole “do as I say, not as I do” philosophy.

     MJ, you stay… uh classy. You’re not fit to wipe my husband’s boots. Then again, when you have no problem with US magazine smearing a VP candidate so Obummer can win, that speaks volumes. Or, should I say electioneering?

104. #104
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:47 am, scottthong said:

     Malkin is not Caucasian. Therefore, to use the Obama Defense:

     RACISTS!!!!!!!!!!!11

105. #105
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:03 am, RetFireman said:

     The Golden Calf’s campaign should be made to not only answer for and apologize for their actions and words, they should also be made to return any and all donations submitted by them to show good faith and that site be permanently declared a “Hate Site”, subject to being filtered by ‘Nanny’ software. Anything less denotes complicity and approval by The Golden Calf.

106. #106
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:56 am, navywife91 said:

     Remember Smirky and Smarmy? You’re such a hypocrite MM.

     You are so right. Smirky and smarmy are definitely the same as “tiquana donkey show”, “ping pong qu***#@% b*tch”, “whore”. I mean c’mon lady, even we thought some of the Palin names were funny (caribou barbie), but racial slurs and sexual slurs aren’t funny. Are they?

107. #107
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:57 am, navywife91 said:

     Oh, and emjem, she’s not fit to lick the bottom of your husband’s boots or my husband’s for that matter. You know you’re getting to the libs when they start resorting to this behavior.

     ha ha hardy har har!
     It’s killin’ ‘em
     and I’m lovin’ it!!!!!!

108. #108
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:06 am, LibTired said:

     Bunch of dopes.

109. #109
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:41 am, tre said:

     Oh well. Michelle, do you know how to tell when you’ve out-argued a liberal?

     When they’re reduced to calling you names instead of using logic and reason. The more vile and hateful the names, the worse you’ve beaten them. Because they’re now trying to make you mad.

110. #110
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:25 pm, mistressjustice said:

     You once ran off a list of your most cherished liberal core beliefs and one of them was decidedly against owning a gun and worshipping at the altar of baby killers. Infanticide is best. Less is more. Population control is the new birth control policy of the Dem party. Ring any bells?

     I am very pro-choice. Feel free to call it infanticide. I don’t get caught up in labels from the likes of you. I am also very pro-gun, and have stated so numerous times. The Heller thread proves my point. You are a shameless liar.

111. #111
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:33 pm, mistressjustice said:

     You are so right. Smirky and smarmy are definitely the same as “tiquana donkey show”, “ping pong qu***#@% b*tch”, “whore”. I mean c’mon lady, even we thought some of the Palin names were funny (caribou barbie), but racial slurs and sexual slurs aren’t funny. Are they?

     Some are funny and some aren’t. Is Michelle against name calling blogs or not? What’s good for the goose…

     Good thing I’m not into boot licking, or a$$ kissing either. Emjem rants her anti liberal strawman talking points, and I respond with the the nonsense her posts deserve.

     All in all, I’m feeling pretty dang good this election season. Hardy har har….

112. #112
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:06 pm, navywife91 said:

     Some are funny and some aren’t. Is Michelle against name calling blogs or not? What’s good for the goose…

     Seriously, if the only way you can classify these racial slurs and epithets is to put them into the “funny” and “not funny” categories you’ve got problems. When MM starts referring to people by “funny” and “not so funny” racial slurs, then your goose and gander sticks, but until then…

     Moral relativism doesn’t work well here, especially with such weak arguments.

113. #113
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:36 pm, mistressjustice said:

     When MM starts referring to people by “funny” and “not so funny” racial slurs, then your goose and gander sticks, but until then…

     Much like the posters at DU, MM has “guests” use racial slurs. The comments are never deleted.

     Do you recall bit-boy calling Spike Lee a nigger?
     How about Archon(?) refering to the “darkie” church Obama went to?
     Did you miss Die Hippie calling Diddy a D.A.N the other day?
     I’ve seen two “guests” talk about how blacks should go back to Africa, and have seen the term “wetback” used to describe illegals.
     That’s just off the top of my head.

     MM must find some of the comments as a good, solid representation of her site. I know she must have thought her “Jivetalk Express” thread was pretty funny. If she wants to play in the cesspool with all of her “guests” she can wear the funk.

114. #114
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 2:41 pm, navywife91 said:

     Much like the posters at DU, MM has “guests” use racial slurs. The comments are never deleted

     I agree we have had some losers here, but they’re gone and MM sees to it. I don’t go back to search for the quotes, but they are pretty much around forever, thanks to the internet. That’s how so many people get into trouble.

     Do you recall bit-boy calling Spike Lee a nigger?

     See my post above. Fortunately I didn’t have to see the ignorant boob’s post, but I’m pretty sure he’s gone. The point is: It’s not tolerated.

     Did you miss Die Hippie calling Diddy a D.A.N the other day?

     If you look at the end of the thread, notice I asked him to clarify that. I initially accepted his answer because I do not know him. However, on another thread, I complained to MM about him using the word fa**ot and it’s shorter version. She responded and deleted the comments. I haven’t seen him on here since.

     I’ve seen two “guests” talk about how blacks should go back to Africa, and have seen the term “wetback” used to describe illegals.

     I have no idea who or what you’re talking about, but it wouldn’t surprise me. Compared to DU, Huffpo and DK, I’d say those comments, though offensive, are tame by their standards.

     How about Archon(?) refering to the “darkie” church Obama went to?

     I am also offended by that, although I didn’t see that comment either. I guess I’m repeating myself here, but is Archon even on this blog anymore?

     I think it’s completely unfair for you to think MM finds the comments fair or good. I don’t believe she reads every thread, every day. When there is a problem, you tell her. I have twice since I’ve been on this blog and both the agitators are gone baby gone. You seem to have a sense of humor about some things and you come right out and say you are for Obama. In this last post, I really don’t think your complaint is valid. We’ll agree to disagree.

115. #115
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:15 pm, KaosKlerik said:

     On September 2nd, 2008 at 9:12 pm,

     fred5676 said:
     From one of the MDS posters:

     The possibilities of nicknames are literally endless for a moran of her caliber.

     Who knows, maybe a ‘moran’ is a good thing??

     Or not. This guy is such a sleaze my socialist sister is tired of voting for him.

116. #116
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:17 pm, Vntnrse said:

     Personally I feel that name-calling is only used to cover the inability to state one’s position with intelligent civility. I also observe that no matter how much the name callers may be either ignored or argued with, they don’t usually stick around very long, leaving this place open to civil discourse once again. Just my humble observation.

Comment pages: « 1 [2]