<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And right on cue&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/02/and-right-on-cue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/02/and-right-on-cue/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:12:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vntnrse</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/02/and-right-on-cue/comment-page-2/#comment-437666</link>
		<dc:creator>Vntnrse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13645#comment-437666</guid>
		<description>Personally I feel that name-calling is only used to cover the inability to state one&#039;s position with intelligent civility.  I also observe that no matter how much the name callers may be either ignored or argued with, they don&#039;t usually stick around very long, leaving this place open to civil discourse once again.  Just my humble observation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I feel that name-calling is only used to cover the inability to state one&#8217;s position with intelligent civility.  I also observe that no matter how much the name callers may be either ignored or argued with, they don&#8217;t usually stick around very long, leaving this place open to civil discourse once again.  Just my humble observation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KaosKlerik</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/02/and-right-on-cue/comment-page-2/#comment-436747</link>
		<dc:creator>KaosKlerik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13645#comment-436747</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On September 2nd, 2008 at 9:12 pm, 
&lt;blockquote&gt;fred5676 said: 
From one of the MDS posters:

The possibilities of nicknames are literally endless for a moran of her caliber.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Who knows, maybe a ‘moran’ is a good thing??&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jimmoran.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Or not&lt;/a&gt;.  This guy is such a sleaze my socialist sister is tired of voting for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On September 2nd, 2008 at 9:12 pm, </p>
<blockquote><p>fred5676 said:<br />
From one of the MDS posters:</p>
<p>The possibilities of nicknames are literally endless for a moran of her caliber.</p></blockquote>
<p>Who knows, maybe a ‘moran’ is a good thing??</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.jimmoran.org/" rel="nofollow">Or not</a>.  This guy is such a sleaze my socialist sister is tired of voting for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navywife91</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/02/and-right-on-cue/comment-page-2/#comment-436477</link>
		<dc:creator>navywife91</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13645#comment-436477</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Much like the posters at DU, MM has “guests” use racial slurs. The comments are never deleted&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree we have had some losers here, but they&#039;re gone and MM sees to it.  I don&#039;t go back to search for the quotes, but they are pretty much around forever, thanks to the internet.  That&#039;s how so many people get into trouble.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Do you recall bit-boy calling Spike Lee a nigger?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

See my post above.  Fortunately I didn&#039;t have to see the ignorant boob&#039;s post, but I&#039;m pretty sure he&#039;s gone. The point is: It&#039;s not tolerated.
 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Did you miss Die Hippie calling Diddy a D.A.N the other day?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If you look at the end of the thread, notice I asked him to clarify that.  I initially accepted his answer because I do not know him.  However, on another thread, I complained to MM about him using the word fa**ot and it&#039;s shorter version.  She responded and deleted the comments.  I haven&#039;t seen him on here since.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ve seen two “guests” talk about how blacks should go back to Africa, and have seen the term “wetback” used to describe illegals.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have no idea who or what you&#039;re talking about, but it wouldn&#039;t surprise me.  Compared to DU, Huffpo and DK, I&#039;d say those comments, though offensive, are tame by their standards.

&lt;blockquote&gt;How about Archon(?) refering to the “darkie” church Obama went to?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I am also offended by that, although I didn&#039;t see that comment either.  I guess I&#039;m repeating myself here, but is Archon even on this blog anymore?

I think it&#039;s completely unfair for you to think MM finds the comments fair or good.  I don&#039;t believe she reads every thread, every day.  When there is a problem, you tell her.  I have twice since I&#039;ve been on this blog and both the agitators are gone baby gone.  You seem to have a sense of humor about some things and you come right out and say you are for Obama.  In this last post, I really don&#039;t think your complaint is valid.  We&#039;ll agree to disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Much like the posters at DU, MM has “guests” use racial slurs. The comments are never deleted</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree we have had some losers here, but they&#8217;re gone and MM sees to it.  I don&#8217;t go back to search for the quotes, but they are pretty much around forever, thanks to the internet.  That&#8217;s how so many people get into trouble.</p>
<blockquote><p>Do you recall bit-boy calling Spike Lee a nigger?</p></blockquote>
<p>See my post above.  Fortunately I didn&#8217;t have to see the ignorant boob&#8217;s post, but I&#8217;m pretty sure he&#8217;s gone. The point is: It&#8217;s not tolerated.</p>
<blockquote><p>Did you miss Die Hippie calling Diddy a D.A.N the other day?</p></blockquote>
<p>If you look at the end of the thread, notice I asked him to clarify that.  I initially accepted his answer because I do not know him.  However, on another thread, I complained to MM about him using the word fa**ot and it&#8217;s shorter version.  She responded and deleted the comments.  I haven&#8217;t seen him on here since.</p>
<blockquote><p>I’ve seen two “guests” talk about how blacks should go back to Africa, and have seen the term “wetback” used to describe illegals.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have no idea who or what you&#8217;re talking about, but it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me.  Compared to DU, Huffpo and DK, I&#8217;d say those comments, though offensive, are tame by their standards.</p>
<blockquote><p>How about Archon(?) refering to the “darkie” church Obama went to?</p></blockquote>
<p>I am also offended by that, although I didn&#8217;t see that comment either.  I guess I&#8217;m repeating myself here, but is Archon even on this blog anymore?</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s completely unfair for you to think MM finds the comments fair or good.  I don&#8217;t believe she reads every thread, every day.  When there is a problem, you tell her.  I have twice since I&#8217;ve been on this blog and both the agitators are gone baby gone.  You seem to have a sense of humor about some things and you come right out and say you are for Obama.  In this last post, I really don&#8217;t think your complaint is valid.  We&#8217;ll agree to disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mistressjustice</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/02/and-right-on-cue/comment-page-2/#comment-436330</link>
		<dc:creator>mistressjustice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13645#comment-436330</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;When MM starts referring to people by “funny” and “not so funny” racial slurs, then your goose and gander sticks, but until then…&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Much like the posters at DU, MM has &quot;guests&quot; use racial slurs.  The comments are never deleted.  

Do you recall bit-boy calling Spike Lee a nigger?
How about Archon(?) refering to the &quot;darkie&quot; church Obama went to?
Did you miss Die Hippie calling Diddy a D.A.N the other day?
I&#039;ve seen two &quot;guests&quot; talk about how blacks should go back to Africa, and have seen the term &quot;wetback&quot; used to describe illegals.
That&#039;s just off the top of my head. 

MM must find some of the comments as a good, solid representation of her site.  I know she must have thought her &quot;Jivetalk Express&quot; thread was pretty funny.  If she wants to play in the cesspool with all of her &quot;guests&quot; she can wear the funk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When MM starts referring to people by “funny” and “not so funny” racial slurs, then your goose and gander sticks, but until then…</p></blockquote>
<p>Much like the posters at DU, MM has &#8220;guests&#8221; use racial slurs.  The comments are never deleted.  </p>
<p>Do you recall bit-boy calling Spike Lee a nigger?<br />
How about Archon(?) refering to the &#8220;darkie&#8221; church Obama went to?<br />
Did you miss Die Hippie calling Diddy a D.A.N the other day?<br />
I&#8217;ve seen two &#8220;guests&#8221; talk about how blacks should go back to Africa, and have seen the term &#8220;wetback&#8221; used to describe illegals.<br />
That&#8217;s just off the top of my head. </p>
<p>MM must find some of the comments as a good, solid representation of her site.  I know she must have thought her &#8220;Jivetalk Express&#8221; thread was pretty funny.  If she wants to play in the cesspool with all of her &#8220;guests&#8221; she can wear the funk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navywife91</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/02/and-right-on-cue/comment-page-2/#comment-436258</link>
		<dc:creator>navywife91</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13645#comment-436258</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Some are funny and some aren’t. Is Michelle against name calling blogs or not? What’s good for the goose…&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Seriously, if the only way you can classify these racial slurs and epithets is to put them into the &quot;funny&quot; and &quot;not funny&quot; categories you&#039;ve got problems.  When MM starts referring to people by &quot;funny&quot; and &quot;not so funny&quot; racial slurs, then your goose and gander sticks, but until then...

Moral relativism doesn&#039;t work well here, especially with such weak arguments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Some are funny and some aren’t. Is Michelle against name calling blogs or not? What’s good for the goose…</p></blockquote>
<p>Seriously, if the only way you can classify these racial slurs and epithets is to put them into the &#8220;funny&#8221; and &#8220;not funny&#8221; categories you&#8217;ve got problems.  When MM starts referring to people by &#8220;funny&#8221; and &#8220;not so funny&#8221; racial slurs, then your goose and gander sticks, but until then&#8230;</p>
<p>Moral relativism doesn&#8217;t work well here, especially with such weak arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mistressjustice</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/02/and-right-on-cue/comment-page-2/#comment-436143</link>
		<dc:creator>mistressjustice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13645#comment-436143</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You are so right. Smirky and smarmy are definitely the same as “tiquana donkey show”, “ping pong qu***#@% b*tch”, “whore”. I mean c’mon lady, even we thought some of the Palin names were funny (caribou barbie), but racial slurs and sexual slurs aren’t funny. Are they?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Some are funny and some aren&#039;t.  Is Michelle against name calling blogs or not? What&#039;s good for the goose...

Good thing I&#039;m not into boot licking, or a$$ kissing either.  Emjem rants her anti liberal strawman talking points, and I respond with the the nonsense her posts deserve.

All in all, I&#039;m feeling pretty dang good this election season. Hardy har har....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You are so right. Smirky and smarmy are definitely the same as “tiquana donkey show”, “ping pong qu***#@% b*tch”, “whore”. I mean c’mon lady, even we thought some of the Palin names were funny (caribou barbie), but racial slurs and sexual slurs aren’t funny. Are they?</p></blockquote>
<p>Some are funny and some aren&#8217;t.  Is Michelle against name calling blogs or not? What&#8217;s good for the goose&#8230;</p>
<p>Good thing I&#8217;m not into boot licking, or a$$ kissing either.  Emjem rants her anti liberal strawman talking points, and I respond with the the nonsense her posts deserve.</p>
<p>All in all, I&#8217;m feeling pretty dang good this election season. Hardy har har&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mistressjustice</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/02/and-right-on-cue/comment-page-2/#comment-436118</link>
		<dc:creator>mistressjustice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13645#comment-436118</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You once ran off a list of your most cherished &lt;strong&gt;liberal core beliefs and one of them was decidedly against owning a gun &lt;/strong&gt;and worshipping at the altar of baby killers. Infanticide is best. Less is more. Population control is the new birth control policy of the Dem party. Ring any bells?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I am very pro-choice.  Feel free to call it infanticide.  I don&#039;t get caught up in labels from the likes of you.  I am also very pro-gun, and have stated so numerous times.  The &lt;em&gt;Heller&lt;/em&gt; thread proves my point.  You are a shameless liar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You once ran off a list of your most cherished <strong>liberal core beliefs and one of them was decidedly against owning a gun </strong>and worshipping at the altar of baby killers. Infanticide is best. Less is more. Population control is the new birth control policy of the Dem party. Ring any bells?</p></blockquote>
<p>I am very pro-choice.  Feel free to call it infanticide.  I don&#8217;t get caught up in labels from the likes of you.  I am also very pro-gun, and have stated so numerous times.  The <em>Heller</em> thread proves my point.  You are a shameless liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tre</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/02/and-right-on-cue/comment-page-2/#comment-435686</link>
		<dc:creator>tre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13645#comment-435686</guid>
		<description>Oh well. Michelle, do you know how to tell when you&#039;ve out-argued a liberal? 

When they&#039;re reduced to calling you names instead of using logic and reason. The more vile and hateful the names, the worse you&#039;ve beaten them. Because they&#039;re now trying to make you mad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh well. Michelle, do you know how to tell when you&#8217;ve out-argued a liberal? </p>
<p>When they&#8217;re reduced to calling you names instead of using logic and reason. The more vile and hateful the names, the worse you&#8217;ve beaten them. Because they&#8217;re now trying to make you mad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LibTired</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/02/and-right-on-cue/comment-page-2/#comment-435622</link>
		<dc:creator>LibTired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13645#comment-435622</guid>
		<description>Bunch of dopes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bunch of dopes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navywife91</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/02/and-right-on-cue/comment-page-2/#comment-435602</link>
		<dc:creator>navywife91</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13645#comment-435602</guid>
		<description>Oh, and emjem, she&#039;s not fit to lick the bottom of your husband&#039;s boots or my husband&#039;s for that matter.  You know you&#039;re getting to the libs when they start resorting to this behavior.  


ha ha hardy har har!
It&#039;s killin&#039; &#039;em
and I&#039;m lovin&#039; it!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and emjem, she&#8217;s not fit to lick the bottom of your husband&#8217;s boots or my husband&#8217;s for that matter.  You know you&#8217;re getting to the libs when they start resorting to this behavior.  </p>
<p>ha ha hardy har har!<br />
It&#8217;s killin&#8217; &#8216;em<br />
and I&#8217;m lovin&#8217; it!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navywife91</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/02/and-right-on-cue/comment-page-2/#comment-435598</link>
		<dc:creator>navywife91</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13645#comment-435598</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Remember Smirky and Smarmy? You’re such a hypocrite MM.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You are so right.  Smirky and smarmy are definitely the same as &quot;tiquana donkey show&quot;, &quot;ping pong qu***#@% b*tch&quot;, &quot;whore&quot;.  I mean c&#039;mon lady, even we thought some of the Palin names were funny (caribou barbie), but racial slurs and sexual slurs aren&#039;t funny.  Are they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Remember Smirky and Smarmy? You’re such a hypocrite MM.</p></blockquote>
<p>You are so right.  Smirky and smarmy are definitely the same as &#8220;tiquana donkey show&#8221;, &#8220;ping pong qu***#@% b*tch&#8221;, &#8220;whore&#8221;.  I mean c&#8217;mon lady, even we thought some of the Palin names were funny (caribou barbie), but racial slurs and sexual slurs aren&#8217;t funny.  Are they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RetFireman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/02/and-right-on-cue/comment-page-2/#comment-435466</link>
		<dc:creator>RetFireman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13645#comment-435466</guid>
		<description>The Golden Calf&#039;s campaign should be made to not only answer for and apologize for their actions and words, they should also be made to return any and all donations submitted by them to show good faith and that site be permanently declared a &quot;Hate Site&quot;, subject to being filtered by &#039;Nanny&#039; software.  Anything less denotes complicity and approval by The Golden Calf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Golden Calf&#8217;s campaign should be made to not only answer for and apologize for their actions and words, they should also be made to return any and all donations submitted by them to show good faith and that site be permanently declared a &#8220;Hate Site&#8221;, subject to being filtered by &#8216;Nanny&#8217; software.  Anything less denotes complicity and approval by The Golden Calf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ.  Just Russ.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/02/and-right-on-cue/comment-page-2/#comment-435422</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ.  Just Russ.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13645#comment-435422</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Welcome aboard...&lt;/strong&gt;

Welcome to our big tent, Bruce. Sure, some of us who wear the Republican label can occasionally do remarkably dumb things, but we try not to make a habit of it.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Welcome aboard&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Welcome to our big tent, Bruce. Sure, some of us who wear the Republican label can occasionally do remarkably dumb things, but we try not to make a habit of it&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottthong</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/02/and-right-on-cue/comment-page-2/#comment-435421</link>
		<dc:creator>scottthong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13645#comment-435421</guid>
		<description>Malkin is not Caucasian. Therefore, to use the Obama Defense:

RACISTS!!!!!!!!!!!11</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Malkin is not Caucasian. Therefore, to use the Obama Defense:</p>
<p>RACISTS!!!!!!!!!!!11</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emjem24</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/02/and-right-on-cue/comment-page-2/#comment-435338</link>
		<dc:creator>emjem24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 05:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13645#comment-435338</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Exactly. At gunpoint. Wait, I don’t have a daughter. Oh well, if I did I’d encourage her to get knocked up just so that she could kill it. Fun times for all. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow. Nice to know liberal, one issue voters (besides gun control) continue to stay classy. :roll:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Yes I encourage it. When does your hubby come back? I’ll have a loogy ready.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Just stating the examples of left-wing rage at work. I&#039;m amazed that, yet again, being a liberal woman isn&#039;t idiot proof. :oops:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Liar. Find a quote.
Bug off. You’re a joke.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s some hollow engagement there. Feminism really is inverted. You once ran off a list of your most cherished liberal core beliefs and one of them was decidedly against owning a gun and worshipping at the altar of baby killers. Infanticide is best. Less is more. Population control is the new birth control policy of the Dem party. Ring any bells?

&lt;blockquote&gt;MM insults and calls names on a regualar basis. She can take some in return, and like it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Smarmy and snarky are insults? I would say Michelle is voicing the personality traits of two machine-trained, liberal politicians, one from Chicago, one from DE and both know all about the Dem&#039;s whole &quot;do as I say, not as I do&quot; philosophy.

MJ, you stay... uh classy. You&#039;re not fit to wipe my husband&#039;s boots. Then again, when you have no problem with US magazine smearing a VP candidate so Obummer can win, that speaks volumes. Or, should I say electioneering?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Exactly. At gunpoint. Wait, I don’t have a daughter. Oh well, if I did I’d encourage her to get knocked up just so that she could kill it. Fun times for all. </p></blockquote>
<p>Wow. Nice to know liberal, one issue voters (besides gun control) continue to stay classy. <img src='http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<blockquote><p>Yes I encourage it. When does your hubby come back? I’ll have a loogy ready.</p></blockquote>
<p>Just stating the examples of left-wing rage at work. I&#8217;m amazed that, yet again, being a liberal woman isn&#8217;t idiot proof. <img src='http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_redface.gif' alt=':oops:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<blockquote><p>Liar. Find a quote.<br />
Bug off. You’re a joke.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s some hollow engagement there. Feminism really is inverted. You once ran off a list of your most cherished liberal core beliefs and one of them was decidedly against owning a gun and worshipping at the altar of baby killers. Infanticide is best. Less is more. Population control is the new birth control policy of the Dem party. Ring any bells?</p>
<blockquote><p>MM insults and calls names on a regualar basis. She can take some in return, and like it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Smarmy and snarky are insults? I would say Michelle is voicing the personality traits of two machine-trained, liberal politicians, one from Chicago, one from DE and both know all about the Dem&#8217;s whole &#8220;do as I say, not as I do&#8221; philosophy.</p>
<p>MJ, you stay&#8230; uh classy. You&#8217;re not fit to wipe my husband&#8217;s boots. Then again, when you have no problem with US magazine smearing a VP candidate so Obummer can win, that speaks volumes. Or, should I say electioneering?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
