Obama defends his superior record of experience

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 2, 2008 02:12 PM

Even he doesn’t sound like he believes himself anymore.

Uhhhhhhhhhhh…

Posted in: Barack Obama

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. CNN Video Anderson Cooper Obama Experience vs Sarah Palin : BigMouthFrog
  2. Experience: “Wasilly” vs. Obamaland « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
  3. Obama Claims He Is More Experienced Than Palin Because He Is Running For President | Right Voices
  4. Right Truth
  5. What a Moron! | Hennessy's View
  6. What a Moron! | Hennessy's View
  7. Stuck On Stupid
  8. Obama Deliberately Misrepresents Sarah Palin’s Experience « American Sentinel
  9. Obama DELIBERATELY Distorts Sarah Palin’s Experience « Start Thinking Right
  10. Senator Obama: 57 States and 50 City Employees? Answer: 50 States and 25,000+ State Employees « Pronk Palisades
  11. $350 Million Raised And Obama Is Pressed For Cash And Running Out Of Options…”Uh, so I think that, uh, our ability to manage large systems, uh, and to, uh, execute, uh, I think has been made clear over the last couple of years” | Right V

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #433942
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:15 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:13 pm, wighttrasch said:
    Henceforth, we should term the overusage of ‘uhs’ whist speaking as ‘obamaing’:

    Shouldn’t this practice be called “Obamics”?

  2. #433945
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:15 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Anyone notice that angry libs who talk about Palin’s current tenure as governor somehow downgrade it to one year?

    I’m thinkin’ the general rule here is to round off to the higher number when it’s above the halfway mark, not the other way around. I guess they didn’t quite grasp that in elementary school.

    Regardless, she’s been governor now for 18 months…not 12.

  3. #433947
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:15 pm, JDinTX said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 2:46 pm, BemusedLib said:
    You’re right, Palin wins the office manager contest. So what? I believe it was Mike Dukakis who was taunted by the Republicans for saying that “this election isn’t about ideology, it’s about competence.” and “Barak has vision, he has experience on the foreign policy committee, he thinks deeply and well about the issues that affect us and he has been tested by a grueling process.”
    And Barack has no competence. He has less than 1/2 year working in the Senate and has not accomplished anything. His vision will turn the U.S. into another third world country. He only thinks deeply when the teleprompter is working correctly.

  4. #433948
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:16 pm, wighttrasch said:

    PBoilermaker;

    uhhh, perhaps, uhhhhm but that decision is uhhhhbove my payscale.

  5. #433950
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:17 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:15 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:
    Anyone notice that angry libs who talk about Palin’s current tenure as governor somehow downgrade it to one year?

    I’m thinkin’ the general rule here is to round off to the higher number when it’s above the halfway mark, not the other way around. I guess they didn’t quite grasp that in elementary school.

    Regardless, she’s been governor now for 18 months…not 12.

    That’s only the case when they admit she is, in fact, a governor. Most are still referring to her as mayor of a small town with a bible-clinging, gun toting population that varies between 300 and 9,000.

  6. #433952
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:17 pm, lgm said:

    thirteen28 said (#26):

    Man, I love the smell of liberal fear in the morning.

    Trash talk is part of any good competition, but you should check the polls sometimes.

    PKAmmoTroop said (#30):

    Governors run a government, Senators run a campaign.

    And Obama’s campaign is bigger than Palin’s government. Moreover, he built it from scratch. She moved in & has managed not to break it.

    Bucklee said (#37):

    A campaign’s goal is singular, get our guy elected, … (good post)

    So far, the only Presidential thing either McCain or Obama has done is pick a VP. Obama did a better. He was deliberate, prudent, cautious.

  7. #433955
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:21 pm, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    Lets stop trying to use logic and relevant facts on lgm and like-minded commenters. Lets use their liberal-logic and irrelevant facts. Palin is qualified because she is the governor of the largest state in the union.

  8. #433956
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:21 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:17 pm, lgm said:
    So far, the only Presidential thing either McCain or Obama has done is pick a VP. Obama did a better. He was deliberate, prudent, cautious.

    I thought running for president makes one presidential.

    That would make it two things Obama has done, right?

  9. #433958
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:22 pm, FruNobulux said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 2:23 pm, lgm said:

    I disagree. Obama has proven to be a very competent executive.

    So what does Plouffe do?

  10. #433959
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:22 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    ajmontana: McCain/Palin 08′

    Palin/Malkin 12′

  11. #433961
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:23 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    And Obama’s campaign is bigger than Palin’s government. Moreover, he built it from scratch. She moved in & has managed not to break it.

    Well then, if Obama is spending more than $9 billion on his presidency, then he is totally an irresponsible idiot.

    Buy the way LGM, that’s the budget for Alaska. And Palin’s state is slightly smaller than Delaware. Oh yeah, one big difference. She RUNS Alaska. Biden just siphons from it.

  12. #433962
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:24 pm, sonofdy said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 2:52 pm, sonofdy said:

    You’re right, Palin wins the office manager contest. So what?

    Thats kind of the point. When looking for a new office manager, you tend to want someone who has been an office manager…. DDDUUUHHH

    You have a pretty limited view of the President’s job, no?

    I don’t know, you were the one comparing executive experience to being an office manager. Not me.

  13. #433964
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:25 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    And Obama’s campaign is bigger than Palin’s government

    What?!

    it is estimated that the 2007 Alaska budget was the 32nd biggest in the nation at $5.5 billion dollars in expenditures

  14. #433965
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:25 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Fellow posters: After a weekend of endless sexist attacks on Sarah Palin that were universally distateful, may I have a moment to retort Senator Obama is an equally tasteless fashion.

    Senator Obama, you brag that you have managed a larger organization than Governor Palin. You seem to forget that an orgainzation’s size does not matter. It’s how you use the organization.

    Typical liberal view of government. I apologize for this tasteless retort, but now I feel so much better.

  15. #433967
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:25 pm, sonofdy said:

    And Obama’s campaign is bigger than Palin’s government. Moreover, he built it from scratch. She moved in & has managed not to break it.

    Are you sure? The Alaska government has 25,000 full timers. Look up how many Obama has hired.

    to quote the great homer simpson “d’uh”

  16. #433968
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:26 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    I don’t understand Obama sometimes. The guy runs a masterful campaign to win over the assumed nominee Hillary, then has done nothing but blown it since then. This experience question has really thrown him for a loop (notwithstanding McCain’s near forfeit of the high ground on the issue with the Palin pick).

    With the public opinion on the direction of the country, the president and the vice president, why doesn’t Obama hit back with something along the lines of, “How has ‘experience’ benefited us for the past 8 years” continuing with, “I simply don’t offer the kind of Bush/Cheney/McCain experience that has destroyed this country.” This would be red-meat to middle America, but the Obama campaign really has let the GOP define the narrative of him – and more amazingly fights the narrative through the GOP’s prism (selecting Biden as VP anyone?).

    This election is Obama’s to lose, and he’s doing a damn good job of it.

  17. #433969
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:27 pm, Simmer said:

    UH-bama completely ignored Palin’s experience as governor. He has the audacity to compare his experience running a political campaign to that of someone running a state. When you run a campaign, you are dictator of that campaign. There is no need to compromise. There are no checks and balances of power. There are not traditions to uphold or corruption to uncover. A presidential candidate sets his own rules.

    Does UH-bama plan on running the country like he runs a campaign?

  18. #433970
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:27 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:25 pm, Dexter Alarius said:
    And Obama’s campaign is bigger than Palin’s government
    What?!

    it is estimated that the 2007 Alaska budget was the 32nd biggest in the nation at $5.5 billion dollars in expenditures

    The funny thing is they have more “facts” where that one came from.

    When the “facts” run out, they hold competitions to pick the best insulting names for the bottom of the opposing ticket.

    They are against “distractions”, too, because distractions don’t help Michelle Obama’s kids.

  19. #433973
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:29 pm, Bucklee said:

    Well then, if Obama is spending more than $9 billion on his presidency, then he is totally an irresponsible idiot.

    And she also has about 15,000 employees. I wonder why the Saint of Saints needs such an over-bloated campaign. LGM, there are many polls right now and your guy should be way out in front, but depending on which one you read he is either barely ahead, tied or behind McCain.

  20. #433974
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:29 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Well, looks like Obama is on the defensive all of a sudden.

  21. #433976
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:30 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    LGM, there are many polls right now and your guy should be way out in front, but depending on which one you read he is either barely ahead, tied or behind McCain.

    Well, if the libtards weren’t so concerned about other kinds of “bumps”, maybe they would be ahead.

  22. #433977
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:31 pm, prendad said:

    How can I possibly vote for O’bama when he constantly reminds me of Basil Fawlty from the British comedy sitcom “Fawlty Towers”. When he is trying to explain his way out of some moronic situation it’s always “well, uh, like, uh, uhhhhhhhhh, you see it was like, uh, uh, no what I meant was, uh, uh, uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. . . . then he faints dead away. I just keep waiting for O’bama to drop and hit the floor.

  23. #433981
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:33 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I wish I was a fly on Hillary’s wall just about now. I bet she’s rolling her eyes with that “I told you so” look on her face towards Obama.

  24. #433982
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:33 pm, FruNobulux said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:27 pm, PBoilermaker said: The funny thing is they have more “facts” where that one came from.

    Yep, when you’re losing and a liberal, you either call your opponent names or make $#!+ up.

  25. #433983
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:33 pm, conservativesRus said:

    Barak has vision, he has experience on the foreign policy committee, the thinks deeply and well about the issues that affect us and he has been tested by a grueling process.

    And this explains why Obama supports completely the most failed socio-political ideas. Socialism, marxism, communism, collectivism (and the rest) have NEVER worked anywhere.

    I do have a question though. Which issues is it that Obama has thought about deeply and what exactly is his experience on foreign policy?

  26. #433984
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:34 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 2:23 pm, lgm said:
    I disagree. Obama has proven to be a very competent executive. His campaign ran circles around the Clinton campaign even she started with half the party behind her. His VP pick was prudent and well vetted.]

    Senator Clinton was not only running against Senator Obama, but the Obama-fawning media and her biggest disability – Bill. As for selecting Joe Biden as his VP, one should name a VP candidate who can augment the appeal of the presidential candidate. Joe Biden appeals to the same Northeastern/Left coast liberal mindset as Obama without the “celebrity” factor. Having two of the three most liberal members of the United States Senate on your ticket is an excellent way to self-destruct your campaign.

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 2:46 pm, BemusedLib said:
    Barak has vision, he has experience on the foreign policy committee, the thinks deeply and well about the issues that affect us and he has been tested by a grueling process.

    How many days experience on the foreign policy committee does he have? He thinks? Wow! Which grueling process is that?

    ECS

  27. #433985
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:34 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    This election is Obama’s to lose, and he’s doing a damn good job of it.

    Except he is ahead in the polls…we could still be Screwed ‘08.

  28. #433986
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:35 pm, ajmontana said:

    This election is Obama’s to lose, and he’s doing a damn good job of it.

    Good! he’s toast anyway…. ha!
    wait for the debates, you thought saddleback was bad for your boy….. rofl! those two clowns are going to need therapy after the election is over.

  29. #433989
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:36 pm, fred5676 said:

    Gov. Palin obviously doesn’t directly supervise the GMD (Ground Missile Defense) section of the Alaska National Guard, but it is a part of her state’s Guard mission (defending against ICBM’s from North Korea).

    I wonder if Obama would really like to get into how his neighborhood organizing, state senator debater and U.S. Senator debater decision-making responsibilities compare to a state governor’s responsibilities?

    My favorite example: running the offense and calling the plays as her school’s championship basketball team’s point guard gave her more EXECUTIVE experience than Obama and Biden have combined.

  30. #433991
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:36 pm, Jim M. said:

    Don’t know if many folks realize this, but as far as natural disaster threats go, Alaska ranks at the top of the list of any state. They have more earthquakes than Caifornia, get the crap kicked out of them by some horrendous storms, deal with the risk of volcanic eruptions and are at the top of the list for tsunami potential.

    In the hotels there are directions in every room regarding what to do in the event of earthquakes or tsunamis.

    Their emergency services people are a busy bunch.

    Obama is probably going to regret he invited the comparison of his disaster cred by winging a response out there

  31. #433992
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:36 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:34 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    we could still be Screwed ‘08.

    If that’s the case, at least we will go down fighting for something we actually believed in vice voting for the LOTE and feeling dirty about it.

  32. #433993
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:37 pm, chapoutier said:

    LGM, there are many polls right now and your guy should be way out in front, but depending on which one you read he is either barely ahead, tied or behind McCain.

    Don’t worry. Obama actually is way ahead in these polls. See post #60. All of those came, interestingly, after the Palin pick.

    N.B., I did, after posting above, find one very recent national poll that has Obama ahead. The Zogby interactive has McCain up 2 points. But of course, the Zogby interactive is considered a joke by other pollsters.

  33. #433994
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:38 pm, chapoutier said:

    Sorry, meant one very recent national poll that has McCain ahead.

  34. #434001
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:41 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:37 pm, chapoutier said:
    . All of those came, interestingly, after the Palin pick.

    So did approximately $11 million in fundraising over the holiday weekend.

    Have fun clinging to your margin of error polls for a candidate who, given his leg up with the MSM, should be leading by double digits.

  35. #434007
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:45 pm, kwyoung said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 2:27 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:
    All one needs to compare experience is right here.

    So, if I’m reading this right, MichelleO has more executive experience than Baraka?

  36. #434008
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:45 pm, atheling said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:34 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I don’t fully trust the polls.

    Remember 2004? 2000?

    They had Kerry and Gore in double digit leads over Bush at this time.

  37. #434009
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:45 pm, chapoutier said:

    So did approximately $11 million in fundraising over the holiday weekend.

    Have fun clinging to your margin of error polls for a candidate who, given his leg up with the MSM, should be leading by double digits.

    Good on her. She clearly energized a base that was reticent about voting for McCain. But that fundraising isn’t going to mean much after Thursday, will it?

    As for clinging to my “margin of error polls, not a one that I cited fell within the margin and the only people that seem to think Obama should have a double digit lead are the Republicans trying to play down expectations.

    But I will admit, Obama hit a rough patch since the middle of July. Looks like the cure was a bit o’ Palin to drive the independents and insulted Hillary supporters his way.

  38. #434012
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:46 pm, Jim M. said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:17 pm, lgm said:

    And Obama’s campaign is bigger than Palin’s government.

    Nice try. You are proping up that straw man Obama threw up in a moment of haste. Obama was comparing his campaign to the size government of the city of Wasilla, totally ignoring the fact that Palin is a Governor of the State of Alaska.

    See, states are usually larger than the cities within their borders. Unless you are talking about those 7 states admitted after the first 50.

    As for the experience with running a campaign, well that gives you experience in….running a campaign. By that analysis, Karl Rove and David Axelrod should be on the ballot for POTUS.

  39. #434015
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:46 pm, mojo said:

    Hey, Barry’s had TWO autobiographies ghost-written. Doesn’t that qualify him for the Nobel Prize in Literature?

  40. #434017
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:47 pm, Ron Rockstar said:

    Chap, I wouldn’t put to much emphasis on polls. Remember back on election day 2004 when all the exit polls said John Kerry was going to win? How did that work out?

  41. #434018
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:47 pm, conservativesRus said:

    So far, the only Presidential thing either McCain or Obama has done is pick a VP. Obama did a better. He was deliberate, prudent, cautious.

    LGM – how do you know McCain wasn’t those things?
    Just because McCain kept a secret and the MSM is all in a tizzy over it, does NOT mean he wasn’t deliberate, prudent, and cautious. Further the fact that you appear to dislike his choice, gives me many reasons to think McCain was in fact all three of the things which you accuse him of not being.
    (poor sentence I know)

  42. #434019
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:48 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Ya right
    and I’d make a good brain surgeon because I played doctor with little Susie next door when I was a kid.
    GEEEEEEESSS.

  43. #434020
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:48 pm, chapoutier said:

    They had Kerry and Gore in double digit leads over Bush at this time.

    And the main reason they lost was ground operation. The Republicans had it and the Dems didn’t. Wanna guess who EVERYONE, including McCain’s campaign, says has the far superior one this time around?

  44. #434024
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:48 pm, vickisoup said:

    Bemused Lib, wait….Barak has vision, and has been tested??
    “Vision” for what? And don’t say, “Vision for America”. That’s not an answer, particularly since we still don’t know what the he** he envisions, beyond taking from the so-called “rich” and giving to the so-called “poor”.
    Moving on to your next point, “tested” by what? A Presidential campaign? That’s not a test and, besides, how has he “tested” any better in that than McCain? Both have won their party’s nomination.
    They’re even-steven on that front. Sorry, BL (hey…those are the same initals as Bin Laden :shock: ), you’ll have to come up with far better than that to prove your point.
    :roll:

  45. #434025
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:50 pm, atheling said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:45 pm, chapoutier said:

    But I will admit, Obama hit a rough patch since the middle of July. Looks like the cure was a bit o’ Palin to drive the independents and insulted Hillary supporters his way.

    You do realize that the Hillary supporters are getting angry at the “sexist” attacks against Palin, don’t you?

    And you do realize that they want her to run in 2012, which means that Obama must lose this election, don’t you?

  46. #434038
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:56 pm, vickisoup said:

    Most Hillary supporters will support Palin because she’s a woman. Seriously.

  47. #434039
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:56 pm, J S Ragman said:

    Since BHO’s campaign speechifyin’ now seems to be painting a McCain administration as the third Bush administration, can anybody explain to me where they get the statistic that McCain has voted with Bush 90% of the time?

    I mean, my understanding of the federal government doesn’t include the President having a vote in the Senate, so exactly where does that 90% number come from?

    Does it mean that he has voted for 90% of the proposed legislation that the Bush administration has sent to Congress? Does it mean that the President has vetoed 10% of the bills that McCain has voted for?

    And in the midst of all of those statistics, where does the “most liberal” senator come out?

  48. #434042
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:56 pm, PBoilermaker said:
  49. #434043
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:57 pm, Member-VRWC said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 2:23 pm, lgm said: His campaign ran circles around the Clinton campaign

    Like that’s supposed to mean something? That implies that Clinton is worthy of the presidency, which she is not. Clinton doesn’t come close to the executive experience of Sarah Palin. Futher, the only reason Hillary Clinton is a senator and got the opportunity to run for POTUS is because her husband was president. Did it on her own? Don’t make me laugh. Palin, on the other hand, did do it on her own. She didn’t need to ride on anyone else’s coat-tails.

    Clinton ran a bad campaign and still managed to win a majority of the states after BO supposedly had it wrapped up. BO couldn’t close the deal without the help of the special delegates.

    lgm, you continue to be stuck on stupid.

  50. #434045
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:58 pm, Flyoverman said:

    I do not find Obama’s position at this point to be a very good on strategically. In terms of the “ground campaign” the conservatives have always led that effort and since Friday, they are rip, roaring and ready to have at it.

    Amateurs study tactics. Professionals study logistics.

  51. #434052
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:01 pm, BemusedLib said:

    #
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:46 pm, mojo said:

    Hey, Barry’s had TWO autobiographies ghost-written. Doesn’t that qualify him for the Nobel Prize in Literature?

    Unlike McCain, Obama writes his own books. McCains are ghosted by Mark Salter.

    #
    #137
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:47 pm, Ron Rockstar said:

    Chap, I wouldn’t put to much emphasis on polls. Remember back on election day 2004 when all the exit polls said John Kerry was going to win? How did that work out?

    Actually, there’s a strong case to be made that the exit polls were pretty accurate, just that the Republicans voted late in the day (after work)…at any rate, bu the time the polls closed the exits reflected the actually results.

    More to the point is the well-documented phenomenon of respondents lying to pollsters when there’s a black candidate in the race, and between 3 and five points of “support” disappearing between the time the last poll is taken the voting begins. I suspect that there will be less of that this time, but it is a factor.

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:48 pm, vickisoup said:

    Bemused Lib, wait….Barak has vision, and has been tested??
    “Vision” for what? And don’t say, “Vision for America”. That’s not an answer, particularly since we still don’t know what the he** he envisions, beyond taking from the so-called “rich” and giving to the so-called “poor”.
    Moving on to your next point, “tested” by what? A Presidential campaign? That’s not a test and, besides, how has he “tested” any better in that than McCain? Both have won their party’s nomination.
    They’re even-steven on that front. Sorry, BL (hey…those are the same initals as Bin Laden :shock: ), you’ll have to come up with far better than that to prove your point.

    Tested by 25 debates, the work of fundraising and 53 (?) primaries and caucuses. And yes, McCain has been tested as well.

    By the way, have you been to Obama’s website? Anyone who doesn’t have a detailed understanding of Obama’s platform by now is either illiterate or willfully ignorant.

  52. #434061
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:05 pm, atheling said:

    From Hillary is 44:

    At the Disco Democrats convention Il Duce Obama strutted and said “the change we need doesn’t come from Washington. Change comes TO Washington.” For Disco Democrats, change is coming – from Alaska.

    The Disco Democrats are no longer closeted sexists and misogynists. They are now out and proud sexists and misogynists. Throughout the unDemocratic primary campaign Disco Democrats said about Hillary that they would vote for a woman just not this woman – Hillary.

    Now another woman is in contention for a national job who is not named super-experienced-ready-on-Day-1 Hillary Clinton and guess what? This time the complaint is that the woman running for national office is not experienced enough.

    Now it is all about experience.

    If you are a woman with too much experience that is a problem. If you are a woman without excess experience, that is a problem.

    But inexperienced male Obama? No problem – he’s black – and if you don’t vote for him you are a racist – even if you yourself are black.

    Americans who would elect Colin Powell in a heartbeat (Powell is African-American) are called racists because they will not vote for unqualified Barack Obama. African American Colin Powell beats white John McCain yet Americans are still labeled “racists” by Obama’s surrogates.

    Sarah Palin is a strong woman. Strong women scare the Disco Democrats. The Republicans are not much better. But this election cycle, because of their self interest it is a sad fact that it has been right wing news outlets like Fox News and the Republicans who have already and will continue to speak out in defense of women…

    …The woman on the Republican ticket but not on the Democratic ticket confounded many eggheads. At the New York Times, the obtuse Gail Collins wrote that women will not “race off to vote for any candidate with the same internal plumbing” because that is “offensive and historically wrong”.

    Gail Collins does not understand that Hillary Clinton supporters, women, are not considering voting for Governor Palin because of her plumbing but rather because Hillary supporters will not reward with votes sexism and misogyny.

    Gail Collins is upset that John McCain is “pandering” to women. Addressing women’s concern is called a “pander” but addressing issues of concern to other groups is applauded. A “pander” we suppose is in the eye of the beholder.

    Collins compares Palin to “cute” Danny Quayle. The problem with the argument is that the Bush/Quayle ticket won.

    Change is coming to Washington – it’s going to hit the sexist Disco Democrats right between the eyes.

  53. #434062
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:06 pm, Chard402003 said:

    “Wasilly”? IS Obama actually making fun of the name of this town? I realize he hates small town America, but to make fun during the campaign kind of demostrates poor judgment on his part. What an arrogant elitist.

  54. #434069
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:08 pm, chapoutier said:

    I do not find Obama’s position at this point to be a very good on strategically. In terms of the “ground campaign” the conservatives have always led that effort and since Friday, they are rip, roaring and ready to have at it.

    Logistically, Obama has a 3:1 lead in field offices.

    Logistically, Obama has a huge Democratic voter database that he shrewdly developed over the course of the primaries. And is using that database to microtarget individuals that did not vote in the last election.

    Statistically, there have been far more new voters register as Democrat than Republican across the country. Who do you think most of them voted for in the primaries?

  55. #434073
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:09 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Actually, there’s a strong case to be made that the exit polls were pretty accurate, just that the Republicans voted late in the day (after work)…at any rate, bu the time the polls closed the exits reflected the actually results.

    Right. Republicans voted (after work), while the welfare recipients (Democrats) voted earlier in the day.

    More reason to have the elections on a Saturday. But of course, Dems don’t want that…too many Republicans would show up.

  56. #434076
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:09 pm, chapoutier said:

    HAH!

    Atheling, are you actually citing hillaryis44 as any sort of proof of anything?

    Those people are fringier than a Gerry Spence jacket.

  57. #434077
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:10 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Tested by 25 debates, the work of fundraising and 53 (?) primaries and caucuses.

    Funny that you list those “debates” as a credit to Obama.

    Who, exactly, did he debate in those “debates”? He won’t even appear on FOX for fear of being asked real questions, yet he is ready to be POTUS.

    Willfully ignorant indeed.

  58. #434081
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:12 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Who do you think most of them voted for in the primaries?

    Hillary. She won the popular vote among Dems.

  59. #434089
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:15 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    There are so many issues here… I’ll just start at the top.


    BemusedLib said:

    You’re right, Palin wins the office manager contest. So what?

    So I assume you are saying Obama is not qualified to be an office manager. And you’re still going to vote for him?

    I believe it was Mike Dukakis who was taunted by the Republicans for saying that “this election isn’t about ideology, it’s about competence.” Same with this election.

    Proof of Obama’s competence is not known. All we know is that he would get a good grade in public speaking class.

    The fact that the right-wing extremist a heartbeat away from the presidency may be uber-competent (not that a year-and-change at the helm of Alaska is the vastest reservoir of experience one could imagine) provides no comfort for the majority of Americans who are sick of the Bush-McCain era.

    I’ll assume you made a typo… and meant Bush-Cheney… because last time I checked, there was no Bush-McCain Era… beyond the desperate attempt by the Obama campaign to tie Bush and McCain together for political purposes.

    Also, thank you for the compliment of Mrs. Palin. Yes, it does appear that she is uber-competent. Hell.. that should fly with the gamer community too. Those of voting age anyway. Oh.. and hang in there Bemused.. you’ll be old enough to vote soon.

    And, if she’ so competent, why not let her have a press conference to explain her secessionist tendencies, her lobbyists, and her flip-flopping on the Bridge to Nowhere?

    She will.. on National TV this week. And you clearly have no clue of what AIP was/is and what her involvement was. And her position on that bridge was that if Alaska needed it, Alaska should pay for it. It’s a shame members of the US Senate like John “The Criminal” Murtha don’t think that way.

    There’s no indication that she Obama has any foreign policy views, and what we know of her Obama’s domestic policy views is disturbing. She may Obama will never be president, our standards should are be are too high.

    there.. I fixed that paragraph.

    Barak has vision,

    Translation: His eyes are good enough to read the Teleprompter.

    he has experience on the foreign policy committee,

    And what insignificant experience it was!!!

    the thinks deeply and well about the issues that affect us

    I think deeply about what I will have for lunch. So what?

    and he has been tested by a grueling process.

    Uh… we’re back to the campaign being some sort of test? Well…it isn’t.

    -A test would be making a decision to have to send our military into harm’s way, knowing that some of these men and women may not come home.

    -A test would be making policy decisions that will be good for some Americans and not for others. Knowing it’s the best course of action available to us. And then living with that decision.

    -A test would be staring down a hostile enemy knowing that your actions could either start a world war or create world peace.

    So please spare us the drama of Obama’s tough campaign.

    Palin was the second choice of one man seeking to meet a demographic quota. the fact that they’re keeping her under wraps proves that even McCain thinks she’s not ready for prime time.

    Lets not compare Veep choices. Biden is embarrasing. And yes, he was an attempt at Political expediency by Obama… to make up for Obama’s complete lack of ability and experience on foreign policy.

  60. #434090
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:15 pm, William Amos said:

    Meanwhile quietly in the background

    Joe Biden’s son and Brother are being sued for fraud

  61. #434092
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:15 pm, frontierguy said:

    BlameAmericaLast said:
    Well, I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night!

    There were many funny posts here, but that one made me snort some diet coke out my nose. Thanks!! Having a good day already and looking forward to the RNC. As far as polls go, you know polls always lean democrat because non-workers are usually the ones polled and they are majority democrat. Have a good day guys.

  62. #434093
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:16 pm, chapoutier said:

    Hillary. She won the popular vote among Dems.

    Right…if you count Florida (okay) count all of the votes cast for her in Michigan but none of them for Obama (not okay) and not count reasonable extrapolations from about 5 caucus states that do not provide raw vote totals (also not okay).

    And in any case I said new voters, not all of the voters.

  63. #434096
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:17 pm, Vince said:

    chapoutier:

    I hope you realize that Michael Chapoutier is considered a MAVERICK in wine circles!

    Sorry! It ads nothing to this thread but the thought just struck me and I had to voice it or type it.

  64. #434099
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:18 pm, corkie said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:17 pm, lgm said:

    And Obama’s campaign is bigger than Palin’s government. Moreover, he built it from scratch. She moved in & has managed not to break it.

    lgm, please try real, real hard to think for yourself.

  65. #434103
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:19 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Statistically, there have been far more new voters register as Democrat than Republican across the country. Who do you think most of them voted for in the primaries?

    Whomever the local ACORN rep told them to vote for?

  66. #434105
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:20 pm, chapoutier said:

    I hope you realize that Michael Chapoutier is considered a MAVERICK in wine circles!

    It is indeed an homage to his winery. I use this name in other places. I am surprised I have never been contacted about trademark infringement. Actually, disappointed. I am hoping to leverage giving up my screen name and email into a few bottles of free stuff.

  67. #434107
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:21 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:16 pm, chapoutier said:
    Hillary. She won the popular vote among Dems.
    Right…if you count Florida (okay) count all of the votes cast for her in Michigan but none of them for Obama (not okay) and not count reasonable extrapolations from about 5 caucus states that do not provide raw vote totals (also not okay).

    And in any case I said new voters, not all of the voters.

    You are rebutting the argument of your fellow dems. They are the ones who say Hillary won the popular vote. It caused a lot of “chaos” from what I hear.

  68. #434110
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:23 pm, sonofdy said:

    Meanwhile quietly in the background

    Joe Biden’s son and Brother are being sued for fraud

    Fair game libs? Or is it only okay to attack 17 year old pregnant girls?

  69. #434112
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:24 pm, chapoutier said:

    Fair game libs?

    Sure. Why not? You have my blessing.

  70. #434116
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:25 pm, ajmontana said:

    William Amos said:
    Meanwhile quietly in the background

    Joe Biden’s son and Brother are being sued for fraud

    This isn’t a story unless his son is pregnant. :roll:
    or if Emu is still around they were gay lovers. :lol:

  71. #434120
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:26 pm, atheling said:

    chapoutier:

    You asserted that the Hillary supporters will vote for Obama because of Palin’s nomination.

    I showed you a site where the Hillary supporters are NOT going to do so, and I also read over 700 comments by women who are outraged by the attacks against Palin and are going to support her.

    Now you say it’s a “fringe” site? Where is your proof of that?

  72. #434125
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:29 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    If that’s the case, at least we will go down fighting for something we actually believed in vice voting for the LOTE and feeling dirty about it.

    True. I actually like Palin from what I’ve seen so far. But it’s not in the bag by any means. We’ll never convince the nut cases. Palin has a tough job since the focus will be on her, and McCain needs to keep talking issues. The MSM is going to provide Obama the equivalent of several hundred million dollars in air time (my opinion). The nut cases are a distraction – time for McCain to step it up.

  73. #434126
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:29 pm, atheling said:

    Joe Biden’s son and Brother are being sued for fraud

    I guess that means Biden is a crappy father who should now resign from the nomination and go tend to his family’s problems. /sarc

  74. #434129
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:32 pm, mistressjustice said:

    As for clinging to my “margin of error polls, not a one that I cited fell within the margin and the only people that seem to think Obama should have a double digit lead are the Republicans trying to play down expectations.

    Yep.
    Just win baby. I actually hope Obama wins the election by one solitary electoral vote. The spazzing and anger would be highly amusing to me.

  75. #434130
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:33 pm, BruceB said:

    News Flash:
    This just in: igm is just as clueless today as he was yesterday.

    Now back to the movie: “IGM get’s a brain”

  76. #434131
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:34 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:12 pm, PBoilermaker said:
    Who do you think most of them voted for in the primaries?
    Hillary. She won the popular vote among Dems.

    That’s gonna leave a mark.

    ECS

  77. #434132
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:34 pm, lgm said:

    conservativesRus said (#138):

    So far, the only Presidential thing either McCain or Obama has done is pick a VP. Obama did a better. He was deliberate, prudent, cautious.

    how do you know McCain wasn’t those things?
    Just because McCain kept a secret and the MSM is all in a tizzy over it, does NOT mean he wasn’t deliberate, prudent, and cautious.

    The NYTimes reported that the first vetter arrived in Alaska the day before the announcement. Now there are over a dozen belatedly vetting. McCain is running on experience, yet he picked someone without experience. Either it’s important or it’s not.

    Further the fact that you appear to dislike his choice, gives me many reasons to think McCain was in fact all three of the things which you accuse him of not being.

    I think Palin is bad for America and bad for McCain. I’m glad she makes it more likely Obama will win, but that’s the only good thing about the choice.

    (poor sentence I know)

    not bad by blog standards.

  78. #434134
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:34 pm, ajmontana said:

    Giuliani is putting Odopey over the coals on the EXPERIENCE issue right now with Cavuto…. rofl.
    Olberduffus better have on Moore to counter… ha!
    this is too funny

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!

    McCain/Palin 08′
    go make your big zero sign and wah wah in another zip code trolls!

  79. #434135
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:35 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:32 pm, mistressjustice said:
    I actually hope Obama wins the election by one solitary electoral vote. The spazzing and anger would be highly amusing to me.

    Not nearly as amusing as the last 8 years of spazzing and derangement exhibited by the left after unsuccessful attempts to beat W, the “Forrest Gump of Politics”.

  80. #434138
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:37 pm, chapoutier said:

    You asserted that the Hillary supporters will vote for Obama because of Palin’s nomination.

    I showed you a site where the Hillary supporters are NOT going to do so, and I also read over 700 comments by women who are outraged by the attacks against Palin and are going to support her.

    And I am very familiar with that site. It is ground zero for these people. Of course some will vote for McCain simply because of Palin, but the vast majority are going toward Obama. In fact the latest Gallup tracking had Obama’s support from former Hillary supporters at 81%, up from 70% before the convention.

  81. #434139
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:39 pm, jdsbc98 said:

    Lunch box blue collar joe biden’s sons work for hedge funds??? I bet they just wanted to learn about poverty. It’s not a big deal to take over someone’s ownership interest and not pay for it. It’s the Biden way. Maybe his kids can squander the family fortune just like Joe’s Dad did with Grandpa Biden’s American Oil Co. riches.

  82. #434141
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:39 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    The spazzing and anger would be highly amusing to me.

    Oh, you mean kind of like the spazzing and anger that the left has demonstrated for the past 8 years? Nah…we’re above that, you know, likening Bush to Hitler and that sort of grown up stuff.

  83. #434142
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:39 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Barry more experienced than the Governor, mother of 5, wife and self-made person? Muaahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

    :lol:

    That freaking Barry, he’s really a clown!

  84. #434145
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:40 pm, sambo said:

    mistressjustice said:
    Just win baby. I actually hope Obama wins the election by one solitary electoral vote. The spazzing and anger would be highly amusing to me.

    Well I hope you realize what would happen if he loses by 1! It would NOT be good!

  85. #434146
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:40 pm, sonofdy said:

    LGM, Obamas grand “bump” from the convention was all of 6.5 points. Possiably one of the worst ever. The lefts disgusting attacks on a pregnant 17 year old girl is the lowest poltical mud slinging in history. Obamas half assed nod and wink condemnation of it shows just how low and disgusting the DNC has become.

  86. #434148
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:42 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:34 pm, lgm said:
    I’m glad she makes it more likely Obama will win, but that’s the only good thing about the choice.

    If Palin is such a boost for Obama, then why are libs trying so desperately to remove her from the equation? Doing so is tantamount to helping McCain beat Obama.

    Surely, you wouldn’t want that, would you?

    Get your lies straight.

  87. #434150
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:43 pm, chapoutier said:

    LGM, Obamas grand “bump” from the convention was all of 6.5 points. Possiably one of the worst ever.

    No. Actually this would be slightly above average, which historically has been 6%.

  88. #434151
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:44 pm, mistressjustice said:

    Not nearly as amusing as the last 8 years of spazzing and derangement exhibited by the left after unsuccessful attempts to beat W, the “Forrest Gump of Politics”.

    Tell me about it. I can’t believe the idiot got elected twice. Unfreakinbelievable. I’m no fan of McCain, but I’m sure he’s better than W.

  89. #434152
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:44 pm, Savage24 said:

    The only Governor I know that has less experience than Palin is Richardson of New Mexico. He has been Governor for six years and still don’t know now to get here . Obama is a big mouth in a suit.

  90. #434159
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:46 pm, Jim M. said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 3:48 pm, vickisoup said:
    Bemused Lib, wait….Barak has vision, and has been tested??
    “Vision” for what?

    vicki,

    What he meant to say is that Obama has had his vision tested. And the results came back, perfect 20/20 – HINDSHGHT

  91. #434160
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:47 pm, vickisoup said:

    And Richardson wanted to be President, too.

  92. #434161
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:47 pm, chapoutier said:

    If Palin is such a boost for Obama, then why are libs trying so desperately to remove her from the equation? Doing so is tantamount to helping McCain beat Obama.

    Part of the reason she is good for Dems is because she is an easy target. Also, if she were “removed from the equation” and McCain took her off the ticket right now or she withdrew, McCain would 1) look foolish and 2) lose all of the goodwill he had built up with the conservative base and then some. Doesn’t matter who he replaced her with.

    So tell me how what lgm said did not make sense.

  93. #434162
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:47 pm, sambo said:

    He has to refer to her as Gov. Palin and then he turns around and compares his self against her mayor position????

    and even if it were so…he still loses this issue.
    But in this case he comes off as an idiot.

  94. #434163
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:47 pm, mistressjustice said:

    likening Bush to Hitler and that sort of grown up stuff.

    Yes it’s pretty stupid. Morons on this blog compare Obama to Hitler several times daily. I don’t understand some people.

  95. #434164
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:47 pm, vickisoup said:

    Heh! Good one, Jim M. :lol:

  96. #434165
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:48 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Yes it’s pretty stupid. Morons on this blog compare Obama to Hitler several times daily. I don’t understand some people.

    Really? Where?

  97. #434166
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:48 pm, sambo said:

    Jim M. said:
    What he meant to say is that Obama has had his vision tested. And the results came back, perfect 20/20 – HINDSHGHT

    way to go Jimbo!

  98. #434167
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:49 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:44 pm, mistressjustice said:
    Tell me about it. I can’t believe the idiot got elected twice.

    Imagine that. The “idiot” beat the best and brightest the libs had to offer in both elections and he did it with the MSM in the tank for the lib candidates and dead people/illegals voting en masse against him.

    That’s something to be proud of.

  99. #434168
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:49 pm, BayStateRepublican said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:44 pm, mistressjustice said:
    I’m no fan of McCain, but I’m sure he’s better than W.

    Some might say W set the bar a little low, but your honesty is refreshing ;)

  100. #434169
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:49 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 4:08 pm, chapoutier said:

    Factual, but no longer relevant.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Emetic of the day

November 19, 2009 01:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

93 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“You guys make a pretty good photo op.”

How do you say “You lie!” in Mandarin?

November 18, 2009 09:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

Obama’s double-talk on dissent.

Cartoon of the day

November 16, 2009 10:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Rear-ended.

President O-bow-ma

November 14, 2009 09:34 PM by Michelle Malkin

184 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Downward dog.

The fall of the Berlin Wall

November 9, 2009 10:10 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

All the president’s hacks

November 5, 2009 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

23 Comments | 1 Trackback

Mmm, mmm, mmm

November 4, 2009 09:00 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 2 Trackbacks


Categories: Barack Obama



Legal Insurrection

» Calling For Sparkman Apologies

American Thinker

» The Wilding of Sarah Palin
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook