About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

RNC lineup: Open thread; Update: President Bush mocks “the angry left;” Fred on Sarah: “Breath of fresh air;” Liebs addresses his “dear friends”

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 2, 2008 06:08 PM

Scroll down for updates…

President Bush will address the RNC tonight by satellite.

Also on tap in prime time slots:

First Lady Laura Bush.

Former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson.

And Democrat Sen. Joe Lieberman.

FWIW, here’s what GOP insiders are saying about the post-Gustav convention shake-up.

With the base energized, let’s hope Fred Thompson brings on the heat and some no-bull, red-meat inspiration. He’s got a golden opportunity to capture the conservative zeitgeist.

Get your popcorn ready.

***

PJTV is livestreaming.

The Corner has a few advance Fred excerpts.

Via Allah, here’s the official Palin intro video, drawing on her VP announcement speech.

John Hawkins at Right Wing News reports on getting blackballed at the convention.

Pamela at Atlas Shrugged reports on the nomadic search for somewhere to sit and work.

Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey will have video of the day’s events.

Have you seen this photo of anarchists welcoming a Republican to the Twin Cities? Peace and love, dude.

Founding Bloggers has lots of clips from the scene.

And my friends at UStream have wall-to-wall live coverage that you can embed.

***

9:35pm Eastern…Tune in if you can. There’s an amazing video tribute to Medal of Honor recipient and Iraq war hero Michael Monsoor.

9:54pm Eastern. First Lady Laura Bush delivers a nice intro of the President, speaking now from the White House. Bush gets off a good line about how how if McCain’s tormentors in Vietnam didn’t break his spirit, “the Angry Left never will.”

Advance excerpts…

On Senator McCain Being Prepared To Make the Hard Decisions That Fall Solely to the President:

John McCain’s life has prepared him to make those choices. He is ready to lead this Nation.

We live in a dangerous world. And we need a President who understands the lessons of September 11, 2001: that to protect America, we must stay on the offense, stop attacks before they happen, and not wait to be hit again. The man we need is John McCain.

On Senator McCain’s Courage and Vision:

John McCain’s life is a story of service above self.

John is an independent man who thinks for himself. He’s not afraid to tell you when he disagrees. … No matter what the issue, this man is honest and speaks straight from the heart.

Last year, John McCain’s independence and character helped change history. The Democrats had taken control of Congress and were threatening to cut off funds for our troops. In the face of calls for retreat, I ordered a surge of forces into Iraq. Many in Congress said it had no chance of working. Yet one Senator above all had faith in our troops and the importance of their mission – and that was John McCain. Some told him that his early and consistent call for more troops would put his Presidential campaign at risk. He told them he would rather lose an election than see his country lose a war. That is the kind of courage and vision we need in our next Commander-in-Chief.

On Americans Choosing the McCain-Palin Ticket:

I am optimistic about our future, because I believe in the goodness and wisdom of the American people. I am optimistic because I have faith in freedom’s power to lift up all of God’s children and lead this world to a future of peace.

And I am optimistic about something else: When the debates have ended, and all the ads have run, and it is time to vote, Americans will look closely at the judgment, the experience, and the policies of the candidates – and they will cast their ballots for the McCain-Palin ticket.

10:09pm Eastern…Fred Thompson takes the stage.

Prepared remarks…

Tonight our thoughts are still with our friends and fellow citizens in the Gulf Coast area, and our thanks go to those who have worked so hard to keep them safe. There can be no more important work than this.

But what we are doing at this convention is also important to our country.

We are going to nominate the next President and Vice President of the United States of America.

We do so while taking a different view of our country than that of the other party.

Listening to them you’d think that we were in the middle of a great depression; that we are down, disrespected and incapable of prevailing against challenges facing us.

We know that we have challenges … always have, always will.

But we also know that we live in the freest, strongest, most generous and prosperous nation in the history of the world and we are thankful.

Speaking of the vice presidential nominee, what a breath of fresh air Governor Sarah Palin is.

She is from a small town, with small town values, but that’s not good enough for those folks who are attacking her and her family.

Some Washington pundits and media big shots are in a frenzy over the selection of a woman who has actually governed rather than just talked a good game on the Sunday talk shows and hit the Washington cocktail circuit. Well, give me a tough Alaskan Governor who has taken on the political establishment in the largest state in the Union — and won — over the beltway business-as-usual crowd any day of the week.

Let’s be clear … the selection of Governor Palin has the other side and their friends in the media in a state of panic. She is a courageous, successful, reformer, who is not afraid to take on the establishment.

Sound like anyone else we know?

She has run a municipality and she has run a state.

And I can say without fear of contradiction that she is the only nominee in the history of either party who knows how to properly field dress a moose … with the possible exception of Teddy Roosevelt.

She and John McCain are not going to care how much the alligators get irritated when they get to Washington, they’re going to drain that swamp.

But tonight, I’d like to talk to you about the remarkable story of John McCain.

It’s a story about character.

John McCain’s character has been tested like no other presidential candidate in the history of this nation.

He comes from a military family whose service to our country goes back to the Revolutionary War.

The tradition continues.

As I speak, John and Cindy McCain have one son who’s just finished his first tour in Iraq.

Another son is putting “Country First” and is attending the Naval Academy. We have a number of McCains in the audience tonight.

Also here tonight is John’s 96-year-old mother, Roberta. All I’ve got to say is that if Roberta McCain had been the McCain captured by the North Vietnamese, they would have surrendered.

Now, John’s father was a bit of a rebel, too.

In his first two semesters at the Naval Academy, he managed to earn 333 demerits.

Unfortunately, John later saw that as a record to be beaten.

A rebellious mother and a rebellious father - I guess you can see where this is going.

In high school and the Naval Academy, he earned a reputation as a troublemaker.

But as John points out, he wasn’t just a troublemaker. He was the leader of the troublemakers.

Although loaded with demerits like his father, John was principled even in rebellion.

He never violated the honor code.

However, in flight school in Pensacola, he did drive a Corvette and date a girl who worked in a bar as an exotic dancer under the name of Marie, the Flame of Florida.

And the reason I’m telling you these things, is that, apparently, this mixture of rebellion and honor helped John McCain survive the next chapter of his life:

John McCain was preparing to take off from the USS Forrestal for his sixth mission over Vietnam, when a missile from another plane accidentally fired and hit his plane.

The flight deck burst into a fireball of jet fuel.

John’s flight suit caught fire.

He was hit by shrapnel.

It was a scene of horrible human devastation.

Men sacrificed their lives to save others that day. One kid, who John couldn’t identify because he was burned beyond recognition, called out to John to ask if a certain pilot was OK.

John replied that, yes, he was.

The young sailor said, “Thank God”… and then he died.

These are the kind of men John McCain served with.

These are the men and women John McCain knows and understands and loves.

If you want to know who John McCain is, if you want to know what John McCain values, look to the men and women who wear America’s uniform today.

The fire on the Forrestal burned for two days.

20 planes were destroyed.

134 sailors died.

John himself barely dodged death in the inferno and could’ve returned to the States with his ship.

Instead, he volunteered for combat on another carrier that was undermanned from losing so many pilots.

Stepping up.

Putting his “Country First.”

Three months later John McCain was a Prisoner of War.

On October 26, 1967, on his 23rd mission over North Vietnam, a surface-to-air missile slammed into John’s A-4 Skyhawk jet, blowing it out of the sky.

When John ejected, part of the plane hit him — breaking his right knee, his left arm, his right arm in three places.

An angry mob got to him.

A rifle butt broke his shoulder.

A bayonet pierced his ankle and his groin.

They took him to the Hanoi Hilton, where he lapsed in and out of consciousness for days. He was offered medical care for his injuries if he would give up military information in return.

John McCain said “No”.

After days of neglect, covered in grime, lying in his own waste in a filthy room, a doctor attempted to set John’s right arm without success … and without anesthesia.

His other broken bones and injuries were not treated. John developed a high fever, dysentery. He weighed barely a hundred pounds.

Expecting him to die, his captors placed him in a cell with two other POWs who also expected him to die.

But with their help, John McCain fought on.

He persevered.

So then they put him in solitary confinement…for over two years.

Isolation … incredible heat beating on a tin roof. A light bulb in his cell burning 24 hours a day.

Boarded-up cell windows blocking any breath of fresh air.

The oppressive heat causing boils the size of baseballs under his arms.

The outside world limited to what he could see through a crack in a door.

We hear a lot of talk about hope.

John McCain knows about hope. That’s all he had to survive on. For propaganda purposes, his captors offered to let him go home.

John McCain refused.

He refused to leave ahead of men who’d been there longer.

He refused to abandon his conscience and his honor, even for his freedom.

He refused, even though his captors warned him, “It will be very bad for you.”

They were right.

It was.

The guards cracked ribs, broke teeth off at the gums. They cinched a rope around his arms and painfully drew his shoulders back.

Over four days, every two to three hours, the beatings resumed. During one especially fierce beating, he fell, again breaking his arm.

John was beaten for communicating with other prisoners.

He was beaten for NOT communicating with so-called “peace delegations.”

He was beaten for not giving information during interrogations.

When his captors wanted the names of other pilots in his squadron, John gave them the names of the offensive line of the Green Bay Packers.

Whenever John was returned to his cell — walking if he could, dragged if he couldn’t — as he passed his fellow POWs, he would call out to them.

He’d smile … and give them a thumbs-up.

For five-and-a-half years this went on.

John McCain’s bones may have been broken but his spirit never was.

Now, being a POW certainly doesn’t qualify anyone to be President.

But it does reveal character.

This is the kind of character that civilizations from the beginning of history have sought in their leaders.

Strength.

Courage.

Humility.

Wisdom.

Duty.

Honor.

It’s pretty clear there are two questions we will never have to ask ourselves, “Who is this man?” and “Can we trust this man with the Presidency?”

He has been to Iraq eight times since 2003.

He went seeking truth, not publicity.

When he travels abroad, he prefers quietly speaking to the troops amidst the heat and hardship of their daily lives.

And the same character that marked John McCain’s military career has also marked his political career.

This man, John McCain is not intimidated by what the polls say or by what is politically safe or popular.

At a point when the war in Iraq was going badly and the public lost confidence, John stood up and called for more troops.

And now we are winning.

Ronald Reagan was John McCain’s hero.

And President Reagan admired John tremendously.

But when the President proposed putting U.S. troops in Beirut, John McCain, a freshman Congressman, stood up and cast a vote against his hero because he thought the deployment was a mistake.

My friends … that is character you can believe in.

For years, members of Congress, Republican and Democrat alike, have gouged the taxpayer with secret earmark spending.

Well, he has never sought an earmark.

I’ve experienced John’s character first hand.

In 1993, when I was thinking of running for the Senate, I went to John for advice. He convinced me I could help make a difference for our country.

I won that election, and with Republican control of Congress, we reformed welfare.

We balanced the budget.

And we began rebuilding our military.

What I remember most about those years is sitting next to John on the Senate floor as he led battle after battle to change the acrimonious, pork barreling, self serving ways of Washington.

The Senate has always had more than its share of smooth talkers.

And big talkers.

It still has.

But while others were talking reform, John McCain led the effort to make reform happen — always pressing, always moving for what he believed was right and necessary to restore the people’s faith in their government.

Confronting when necessary, reaching across the aisle when possible, John personified why we came to Washington in the first place.

It didn’t always set too well with some of his colleagues.

Some of those fights were losing efforts.

Some were not.

But a man who never quits is never defeated.

Because John McCain stood up our country is better off.

The respect he is given around the world is not because of a teleprompter speech designed to appeal to American critics abroad, but because of decades of clearly demonstrated character and statesmanship.

There has been no time in our nation’s history, since we first pledged allegiance to the American flag, when the character, judgment and leadership of our President was more important.

Terrorists, rogue nations developing nuclear weapons, an increasingly belligerent Russia.

Intensifying competition from China.

Spending at home that threatens to bankrupt future generations. For decades an expanding government … increasingly wasteful and too often incompetent.

To deal with these challenges the Democrats present a history making nominee for president.

History making in that he is the most liberal, most inexperienced nominee to ever run for President. Apparently they believe that he would match up well with the history making, Democrat controlled Congress. History making because it’s the least accomplished and most unpopular Congress in our nation’s history.

Together, they would take on these urgent challenges with protectionism, higher taxes and an even bigger bureaucracy.

And a Supreme Court that could be lost to liberalism for a generation.

This is not reform.

And it’s certainly not change.

It is basically the same old stuff they’ve been peddling for years. America needs a President who understands the nature of the world we live in.

A President who feels no need to apologize for the United States of America.

We need a President who understands that you don’t make citizens prosperous by making Washington richer, and you don’t lift an economic downturn by imposing one of the largest tax increases in American history.

Now our opponents tell you not to worry about their tax increases.

They tell you they are not going to tax your family.

No, they’re just going to tax “businesses”! So unless you buy something from a “business”, like groceries or clothes or gasoline … or unless you get a paycheck from a big or a small “business”, don’t worry … it’s not going to affect you.

They say they are not going to take any water out of your side of the bucket, just the “other” side of the bucket! That’s their idea of tax reform.

My friends, we need a leader who stands on principle.

We need a President, and Vice President, who will take the federal bureaucracy by the scruff of the neck and give it a good shaking.

And we need a President who doesn’t think that the protection of the unborn or a newly born baby is above his pay grade.

The man who will be that President is John McCain.

In the days ahead at this convention, you will hear much more about what John will do as president — what he will do on the economy, on energy, on health care, the environment… It is not my role tonight to explain that vision.

My role is to help remind you of the man behind the vision. Because tonight our country is calling to all of us to step up, stand up, and put “Country First” with John McCain.

Tonight we are being called upon to do what is right for our country.

Tonight we are being called upon to stand up for a strong military … a mature foreign policy … a free and growing economy and for the values that bind us together and keep our nation free.

Tonight, we are being called upon to step up and stand up with John just as he has stood up for our country.

Our country is calling.

John McCain cannot raise his arms above his shoulders.

He cannot salute the flag of the country for which he sacrificed so much. Tonight, as we begin this convention week, yes, we stand with him.

And we salute him.

We salute his character and his courage.

His spirit of independence, and his drive for reform.

His vision to bring security and peace in our time, and continued prosperity for America and all her citizens.

For our own good and our children’s, let us celebrate that vision, that belief, that faith so we can keep America the greatest country the world has ever seen.

God bless John McCain and God bless America.

10:40pm Eastern…Joe Lieberman on stage now addressing his “dear friends”…”We are all Americans”…

Prepared text…

Thank you for that warm welcome. I am honored to be here.

We meet tonight in the wake of a terrible storm that has hit the Gulf Coast but that hurts all of us, because we are all members of our larger American family.

At times like this, we set aside all that divides us, and we come together to help our fellow citizens in need.

What matters is certainly not whether we are Democrats or Republicans, but that we are all Americans.

The truth is, it shouldn’t take a hurricane to bring us together like this.

Every day, across our country, millions of our fellow citizens are facing huge problems.

They are worried about their homes, their jobs, and their businesses; they are worried about the outrageous cost of gas and of health insurance; and they are worried about the threats from our enemies abroad.

But when they look to Washington, all too often they do not see their leaders coming together to tackle these problems.

Instead they see Democrats and Republicans fighting each other, rather than fighting for the American people.

Our founding fathers foresaw the danger of this kind of senseless partisanship. George Washington himself — in his Farewell Address to our country — warned that the “spirit of party” is “the worst enemy” of our democracy and “enfeebles” our government’s ability to do its job.

George Washington was absolutely right. The sad truth is — today we are living through his worst nightmare, in the capital city that bears his name.

And that brings me directly to why I am here tonight. What, after all, is a Democrat like me doing at a Republican convention like this?

The answer is simple.

I’m here to support John McCain because country matters more than party.

I’m here tonight because John McCain is the best choice to bring our country together and lead our country forward.

I’m here because John McCain’s whole life testifies to a great truth: being a Democrat or a Republican is important.

But it is not more important than being an American.

Both presidential candidates this year talk about changing the culture of Washington, about breaking through the partisan gridlock and special interests that are poisoning our politics.

But only one of them has actually done it.

Only one leader has shown the courage and the capability to rise above the smallness of our politics to get big things done for our country and our people.

And that leader is John McCain!

John understands that it shouldn’t take a natural disaster like Hurricane Gustav to get us to take off our partisan blinders and work together to get things done.

It shouldn’t take a natural disaster to teach us that the American people don’t care much if you have an “R” or a “D” after your name.

What they care about is, are we solving the problems they are up against every day?

What you can expect from John McCain as President is precisely what he has done this week: which is to put country first. That is the code by which he has lived his entire life, and that is the code he will carry with him into the White House.

I have personally seen John, over and over again, bring people together from both parties to tackle our toughest problems we face –to reform our campaign finance, lobbying and ethics laws, to create the 9/11 Commission and pass its critical national security reforms, and to end the partisan paralysis over judicial confirmations.

My Democratic friends know all about John’s record of independence and accomplishment.

Maybe that’s why some of them are spending so much time and so much money trying to convince voters that John McCain is someone else.

I’m here, as a Democrat myself, to tell you: Don’t be fooled.

God only made one John McCain, and he is his own man.

If John McCain was just another go-along partisan politician, he never would have taken on corrupt Republican lobbyists, or big corporations that were cheating the American people, or powerful colleagues in Congress who were wasting taxpayer money.

But he did!

If John McCain was just another go-along partisan politician, he never would have led the fight to fix our broken immigration system or to do something about global warming.

But he did!

As a matter of fact, if John McCain is just another partisan Republican, then I’m Michael Moore’s favorite Democrat.

And I’m not.

Senator Obama is a gifted and eloquent young man who can do great things for our country in the years ahead. But eloquence is no substitute for a record — not in these tough times.

In the Senate he has not reached across party lines to get anything significant done, nor has he been willing to take on powerful interest groups in the Democratic Party.

Contrast that to John McCain’s record, or the record of the last Democratic President, Bill Clinton, who stood up to some of those same Democratic interest groups and worked with Republicans to get important things done like welfare reform, free trade agreements, and a balanced budget.

Governor Sarah Palin, like John McCain, is a reformer who has taken on the special interests and reached across party lines. She is a leader we can count on to help John shake up Washington.

That’s why the McCain-Palin ticket is the real ticket for change this year.

The Washington bureaucrats and power brokers can’t build a pen strong enough to hold these two mavericks.

And together, you can count on John McCain and Sarah Palin to fight for America and to fight for you! And that’s what our country needs most right now.

What we need most is not more party unity in America but more national unity!

Especially at a time of war, we need a President we can count on to fight for what’s right for our country — not only when it is easy, but when it is hard.

When others were silent, John McCain had the judgment to sound the alarm about the mistakes we were making in Iraq. When others wanted to retreat in defeat from the field of battle, when Barack Obama was voting to cut off funding for our troops on the ground,

John McCain had the courage to stand against the tide of public opinion and support the surge, and because of that, today, our troops are at last beginning to come home, not in failure, but in honor!

Before I conclude, I ask the indulgence of those in this hall tonight, as I want to speak directly to my fellow Democrats and Independents who are watching.

I know many of you are angry and frustrated by our government and our politics and for good reason.

You may be thinking of voting for John McCain but you’re not sure. Some of you have never voted for a Republican before and in an ordinary election, you probably wouldn’t.

But this is no ordinary election, because these are not ordinary times, and John McCain is no ordinary candidate. You may not agree with John McCain on every issue.

But you can always count on him to be straight with you about where he stands, and to stand for what he thinks is right regardless of politics.

As President, you can count on John McCain to be a restless reformer, who will clean up Washington and get our government working again for you!

So tonight, I ask you whether you are an Independent, a Reagan Democrat or a Clinton Democrat, or just a Democrat: This year, when you vote for President, vote for the person you believe is best for the country, not for the party you happen to belong to.

Vote for the leader who, since the age of 17, when he raised his hand and took an oath to defend and protect our Constitution, has always put our country first.

So, let’s come together to make a great American patriot our next great President!

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. RNC Night One: Night of the Living Fred! « Above My Pay Grade!
  2. More Palin & RNC Action | Democrat=Socialist
  3. Bush On McCain: If They Hanoi Hilton Couldn’t Break Him, You Can Be Sure That The Angry Left Never Will | Right Voices
  4. Webloggin » Laura Bush at RNC: Stark Contrast To Michelle Obama’s Vision on America
  5. No Surprise Here, Fred Likes Sarah
  6. On Last Night’s Festivities « Beltway Snark
  7. Sarah Palin to Deliver Knock out Punch Tonight: « Riggword Weblog
  8. CNN Video: Fred Thompson RNC‘McCain Has Character You Can Believe In’ : BigMouthFrog

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]

  1. #601
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 11:09 pm, Lindsay said:

    Fred Thompson was simply awesome with his speech. Love that guy.

  2. #602
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 11:09 pm, Tennessee Dave said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 11:06 pm, teachem2 said:
    Good night all! 5 am comes way too soon.

    Don’t it though.
    Night all.

  3. #603
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 11:22 pm, Send_Me said:

    If you want to know who John McCain is, if you want to know what John McCain values, look to the men and women who wear America’s uniform today.

    Please, leave the military out of this. The military is apolitical. Speak for yourselves, and not attempt to do so for “the men and women who wear America’s uniform.” While wearing the uniform, servicemen are legally bound to not comment on political matters, which means they can neither confirm nor deny the sentiments of such statements.

    And a Supreme Court that could be lost to liberalism for a generation.

    Yeah, Breyer and Ginsburg have hurt quite a bit. Thank you, Sen. McCain, for voting for their confirmations.

  4. #604
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 11:29 pm, wytammic said:

    Ugh! Not liking Lieberman’s speech. Awkward.

  5. #605
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 11:31 pm, atheling said:

    Please, leave the military out of this

    .

    Uh, you can’t leave the military out if one of the candidates served in that military.

  6. #606
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 11:35 pm, nativeaz08 said:

    1st: GWB’s jab at the angry left! LOL!! How can they get mad at that? It’s TRUE!

    2nd: Heroes in the crowd … were there any at the DNC … if there were, I don’t remember. Won’t forget this group though!

    3rd: Laura Bush talking about what Cindy has been doing the past 8 months! Excellent. Michelle Obama must be sneering at the tv.

    4th: FRED! The jab at the media … Excellent! NBC, CBS, NBC didn’t show this on regular tv because they saw the script. Wimps. Can’t take the truth, can ya? His whole speech was excellent!!

    5th: I thought Joe was very effective. He talked to Democrats and Independents … Obama can’t hold a candle to McCain.

    It was a good start …

  7. #607
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 11:38 pm, ThunderHawkk said:

    If Joe L. would turn Republican, Harry Reid goes away. Why won’t Joe do the right thing?

  8. #608
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 11:54 pm, gco said:

    These ‘protesters’ are products of like-minded parents still living in the 60’s, and it will only get worse. Imagine just how severely screwed up will be the demon spawn of these heathens. It doesn’t matter who wins this election, with these kind of ‘values’ around, the USA is doomed.

    I think that most kids want to look up to their parents and admire them. Growing up, many of the spawn of today’s heathens will recognize their parents for what they really are, reject that, and pursue purposeful lives instead. My dad was/is a 60’s-glorifying pothead, and I can remember, even as a little kid, thinking “I can do way better than that,” and I have. As for him, I understand he currently believes that he can cure illness by touching people. I’d bet that his “specialty” is in breast cancer. So, for all of the crap in our culture, I think we’re far from being ready to throw in the towel.

  9. #609
    On September 2nd, 2008 at 11:55 pm, Send_Me said:

    On September 2nd, 2008 at 11:31 pm, atheling said:

    Please, leave the military out of this.

    Uh, you can’t leave the military out if one of the candidates served in that military.

    I don’t mind him talking about his time in the military. I don’t mind him talking about how much he appreciates, supports, understands, etc. the military. I do mind Thompson’s assertion that McCain and “the men and women who wear America’s uniform” share the same values and beliefs just because they all wore a uniform of the United States Armed Forces. Technically speaking, I can’t even say that I’m in the military and confirm or deny Thompson’s assertion in the same sentence. It’s no different than a politician saying, “The military loves me.” This sort of statement is not fair to the military, since Service Members are in no position to take sides, and is a gross over-generalization of an organization that is supposed to be apolitical in the first place. I’m sure you can understand the implications of a military that didn’t have this sort of policy.

  10. #610
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:09 am, vickisoup said:

    Just for fun, I watched the speeches (and the between-speeches idiocy) on MSNBC. Oh.My.Gosh.
    They cannot…CANNOT…even APPEAR to be unbiased.
    Andrea Mitchell was the worst of the worst, making even ol’ tingly-legs Matthews seem balanced. She was rolling her eyes, she was sort of spitting out her questions and reacting with disdain to answers that didn’t fit her own skewed view of the Republican candidates.
    And Brokaw actually asked Olbermann to allow him to comment further, as though Olbermann is some sort of god. What an embarrassment.
    :shock:

  11. #611
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:18 am, Artbyruth said:

    USA today and Fox news web sites don’t even mention Fred’s speech.

    He should have closed the night instead of Joe.

    But it shows you how hard Fred hit ‘em!!!

    GO FRED!!!!

  12. #612
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:20 am, Ordinary Coloradan said:

    Send_Me if you had served, like I and others, you’d know Thompson is right.

    Good night all.

  13. #613
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:24 am, BrianNY said:

    #603 send me said:

    Please, leave the military out of this. The military is apolitical. Speak for yourselves, and not attempt to do so for “the men and women who wear America’s uniform.”

    Does that apply to the democrats too, and their legal strategy of discounting as many overseas, military absentee ballots as possible during recounts? (See Florida 2000)

  14. #614
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:28 am, Send_Me said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:20 am, Ordinary Coloradan said:
    Send_Me if you had served, like I and others, you’d know Thompson is right.

    Again, you make an assertion that a Service Member is unable to confirm or deny. As a Soldier, I cannot comment other than to say that, as a Soldier, I’m for no politician or party.

  15. #615
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:31 am, Flyover State said:

    Send__Me ought to know what he or she is talking about, I’ll take their word for it.

  16. #616
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:35 am, Send_Me said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:24 am, BrianNY said:
    Does that apply to the democrats too

    Yes, and any other political entity.

    and their legal strategy of discounting as many overseas, military absentee ballots as possible during recounts?

    The law should be enforced. Sure, I want my vote to count, but I care not, as a Soldier, who is preventing its counting. I would take this up with my chain of command and my Congressman.
    As a Soldier, it is no one’s business to know for whom I vote, and I take issue with anyone who presumes to make it their business to say they do know.

  17. #617
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:37 am, Send_Me said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:31 am, Flyover State said:

    Thanks, friend. (BTW, I’m a he :) )

  18. #618
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:38 am, BrianNY said:

    #614 send me said:

    As a Soldier, I cannot comment other than to say that, as a Soldier, I’m for no politician or party.

    I totally understand the US Military position on political matters…but can you also confirm, that by legally fighting to exclude every overseas, military absentee ballot mailed back to Florida in 2000, the democrat party was indeed saying that they were not for you?

  19. #619
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:44 am, Flyover State said:

    (BTW, I’m a he )

    Sorry, Send_me! I’m new here. :)

  20. #620
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:02 am, Send_Me said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:38 am, BrianNY said:
    I totally understand the US Military position on political matters…but can you also confirm, that by legally fighting to exclude every overseas, military absentee ballot mailed back to Florida in 2000, the democrat party was indeed saying that they were not for you?

    I don’t presume to know their motives, but I would have certainly worked with my chain of command and my Congressman to get the problem fixed.
    *takes off military hat* See, we vote as civilians, but we work as Service Members. The civilian aspect of me would be very upset by the situation, but all letters and correspondence to family, friends, newspapers, etc. would not include my rank or position, unless approved by my Public Affairs Office and JAG. Now, the military aspect of me would, having given notice to my chain of command, send a letter to my Congressman, with my name, rank, unit and position, requesting his help to get the situation fixed, not only for me, but also for my subordinates affected by the situation.
    I don’t mean to sound cryptic, but the situation to which you alluded is a tough one for Soldiers. I hope never happens again. We don’t like it when we’re asked to take sides when we know we’re supposed to be impartial :) I’ll ask my legal folks for more clarification about this particular case, and when I see you on here again, I’ll let you know what they had to say. Hope this helps.

  21. #621
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:03 am, BrianNY said:

    #616 send me said:

    As a Soldier, it is no one’s business to know for whom I vote, and I take issue with anyone who presumes to make it their business to say they do know.

    I guess what I’m driving at here is that the democrat party legal team was actively seeking to discount as many overseas, Military ballots mailed back to Florida during the 2000 recounts. They did not afford this same level of scrutiny for any other type of absentee ballot. The democrat party knows damn well which party the majority of the US Military votes for, otherwise, they wouldn’t have dedicated a team of lawyers to oversee and exclude the Military count.

    I don’t know how scientific it was, but news agencies were reporting that the democrats were fearful that as much as 80% of the US Military overseas, absentee ballots were going to George Bush, and the democrats needed to get that figure down to 50% to stay competitive.

    I’m sorry to be so rhetorical while addressing your comments, Send_Me. I do understand your Military position on discussing this type of matter publicly. But even as a civilian, I can see how the majority of the US Military votes. And by their legal actions, so can the democrats.

  22. #622
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:07 am, BrianNY said:

    #620 Send_Me said:

    Hope this helps.

    Indeed, your comments did help. I enjoyed our conversation, even though I was a little out of sync with your responses.

  23. #623
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:08 am, Regulus said:

    Fred’s speech brought to mind a play that came out about 30 years ago: “Give ‘em Hell, Harry!” It was a one-man performance of Harry Truman recalling the highlights of his presidency.

    I found myself more than once exclaiming at the television screen, “Give ‘em hell, Fred!” And he delivered.

    Which is too bad, in a way: if he’d displayed the same fire during his campaign for the nomination as he did tonight, it’d have been McCain giving the “warm up” speech tonight for Thompson and not the other way around.

  24. #624
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:18 am, BrianNY said:

    #623 regulus said:

    …if he’d displayed the same fire during his campaign for the nomination as he did tonight, it’d have been McCain giving the “warm up” speech tonight for Thompson and not the other way around.

    The same thought was mentioned in our household. Some thought Fred’s heart wasn’t fully in the race because he didn’t really want to step on his friend John McCain’s second chance for the Office.

    I do think that Fred Thompson would make one tough and loyal Chief of Staff though.

  25. #625
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:25 am, backwoods conservative said:

    I do think that Fred Thompson would make one tough and loyal Chief of Staff though.

    If I’m not mistaken he’s already played a Chief of Staff in a Clint Eastwood movie. :)

  26. #626
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:59 am, Send_Me said:

    The same thought was mentioned in our household. Some thought Fred’s heart wasn’t fully in the race because he didn’t really want to step on his friend John McCain’s second chance for the Office.

    I just don’t think he felt like playing the stupid games of politics. That’s why I felt his answer to the Global Warming question was classic. Honestly, I’d darn near be asleep too during most of this media-hoopla. He wanted to be serious about this when most folks wanted the drama and excitement instead. Well, we certainly don’t have a drama shortage…

  27. #627
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 2:17 am, emjem24 said:

    Tuesday was a great first start to the RNC. However, Lieberman’s continued “my friends” remarks are a little much at times.

  28. #628
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:43 am, Jimmie said:

    Just a little note on “POLLS”…they are all repeat ALL run by MSM, who are by definition liberal democrat promoters. They say their poles are honest…they are lying, they work the numbers. People who do the polls KNOW that if they present a poll showing anything “unexpected” that they will not be around for the next poll. They are honest in that they can show a sampling and the results. They cheat by knowing what sampling will give them the numbers that will preserve their jobs. You do not have to be a great mathematician to work the numbers. I guesstamate that they “fix” the sample 8 to 10 points in favor of their side, because I have noticed that that is about how much they are off when the actual results come in. Apparently they believe that if they cheat more than that it would be noticeable. So Obama must be polling pretty low for them to be coming in with “even”. Do Not expect to see McCain Palin to ever show a lead in the “polls” Do Not Expect the NYT CBS ABC and all to indorse or write or say anything complementary. Be secure in the knowledge that we are LEADING big in all the polls. If they fool you into letting them win…do not expect the Fairness Doctrine to be Fair.

  29. #629
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:38 am, Ordinary Coloradan said:

    Send_me, you are dead WRONG.

    You CAN say you are for someone, you CAN express publicly an opinion for them, you CAN attend a rally (in civilian clothes), you can put a bumpersticker on your car, you can even argue for or against a candidate in letters to the editor (this board is covered by that rule).

    You just cannot do it in uniform or while acting in performance of your duties or as a representative of the US Military.

    I served. I know. I did it.

    Here is the regulation and rules summary. I hilighted a couple for you.

    DoD Directive 1344.10 (reprinted in the Joint Ethics Regulation, DoD 5500.7-R, Chapter 6) and SECNAVINST 5370.6, which provides guidance of permitted/prohibited political activities by active duty personnel. Basic rules are:

    -Does not preclude personal participation so long as:
    –Not in uniform;
    –No use of Government property or resources;
    –No interference with duty;
    –No implied Government position or involvement.

    -Permitted political activities include but are not limited to:
    –Register, vote and express personal opinions;
    –Encourage other military members to exercise voting rights;
    –Join a political club, and attend political organization;
    –Make monetary contributions to a political organization;
    –Sign petitions for specific legislative action or place candidate’s name on the ballot;
    Write letters to the editor expressing personal views;
    –Bumper stickers on private vehicles.

    -Prohibited political activities. A military member may not:
    –Use official authority to influence/interfere;
    –Be a candidate for civil office;
    –Participate in partisan political campaigns, speeches, articles, TV/radio discussions;
    –Serve in official capacity/sponsor a partisan political club;
    –Conduct political opinion survey;
    –Use contemptuous words (10 U.S.C 888);
    –March or ride in partisan parades;
    –Participate in organized effort to transport voters to polls;
    –Promote political dinners or fundraising events;
    –Attend partisan events as official representative of Armed Forces; note that this does NOT preclude attending as long as you are not representing the Armed Forces
    –Display large signs/banners/posters on private vehicles.

    You are either lying your butt off about being active duty, or you have been grievously misinformed.

    So stop hiding behind false pretenses and take a stand.

    I’m calling you out as a lying poser or an massively ignorant. Which are you?

  30. #630
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:45 am, TXRose said:

    Morning all…just a few moments before second session. Don’t remember who called Gov Sarah, Theodora Roosevelt, but it fits.
    Last night was so grand!!!!!!!!!!! All three speeches were fantastic and “our
    side” looked so great because of them!!
    My Mother always said, and I always told my boys, you are known by the
    friends you have. This is so true of John McCain.

  31. #631
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:31 am, Send_Me said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:38 am, Ordinary Coloradan said:
    You CAN say you are for someone, you CAN express publicly an opinion for them, you CAN attend a rally (in civilian clothes)

    Absolutely, but you cannot go there and say, “as a member of the United States Army/Air Force/Navy/Marines, I believe in this, that or the other candidate/policy/party.” I can’t go on the news, sit there and tell them that I am in the military, give them my rank, position, and unit, and give them my political opinions. Sure, I can comment all day long on message boards like this, but it’s wrong for me to say that I am a Service Member and make that opinion known.

    you can put a bumpersticker on your car,

    Yep. You’re right. I see it all the time. While legal, I don’t agree with the practice, just from a good order and discipline standpoint, but I digress.

    you can even argue for or against a candidate in letters to the editor (this board is covered by that rule).

    Yep, right again; however, my point was that I cannot say that I am an agent of the military and, therefore, I’m voting for such and such. Just the same, I cannot put my name, rank, unit, or position or use a DoD letterhead on a letter to the editor, political campaign, etc. expressing my political opinions.

    You just cannot do it in uniform or while acting in performance of your duties or as a representative of the US Military.

    This is my whole point. Perhaps you misunderstood my intentions. I do not mean to imply that I cannot have political opinions because I’m in the military. I do have them, I consider myself very independent, not associated with any political party, and argue strongly for the positions I support. But, I do not do this by saying, “As a Service Member, I support this political idea or that politician.” That is where it crosses the line. The military is an apolitical organization, and as such we (folks in the military) are told to keep it that way, both through the regulation you quoted, as well as through policy letters from our commanders. I can, and do, argue political points on this blog (you can do the search yourself.) I just don’t do it under my military status.
    As you pointed out: I can do anything a civilian can do, so long as there is:
    –No use of Government property or resources;
    –No interference with duty;
    –No implied Government position or involvement.
    That is all that I have been saying. If you feel that I’ve mislead someone, please, show me why you think that, and we can discuss it.

    You are either lying your butt off about being active duty, or you have been grievously misinformed.

    False dichotomy. Perhaps you may have misunderstood what I was saying or I was not clear enough.

    So stop hiding behind false pretenses and take a stand.

    I’ve been clear on this point. Because my military status is known on this thread, I do not wish to share that opinion because I don’t want there to be confusion that my opinion that of the military or federal government. If you want my opinion, just do a simple search for my screen name on other threads and I’m sure you’ll find it.

    I’m calling you out as a lying poser or an massively ignorant. Which are you?

    You’re entitled to your opinion (it’s not like I can post my records to prove you wrong). But I will say, again, that there is another option you’re not considering. Perhaps I have not been clear enough or you misunderstand what it is I’m saying. Either way, you’re entitled to your opinion.

  32. #632
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:36 pm, Ordinary Coloradan said:

    Send_someoneelse, jsut more BS form you.

    Ive been clear on this point. Because my military status is known on this thread, I do not wish to share that opinion because I don’t want there to be confusion that my opinion that of the military or federal government

    Oh bull. Thats an out and out lie - and a sccummy evasion. I just SHOWED that you were in error per the DOD directives, etc. And you repeat the lie that you cannot reply plainly and take a solid position.

    BULL!

    You are in NO WAY considered as representing, or being an official presence of, an official position of the military, so you CAN express a solid opinion here if you had the courage to do so. You are at the moment arguably a poser, not a real service member, due to your behavior.

    That’s what I’m calling you out on - I showed that you are not legally constrained, and yet you continue to dodge and evade.

    That marks you as disingenuous, or a poseur or else flat out stupid.

    I’ve seen this pattern before, and its almost always because the person at the other end is a faker, someone pretending to be in the military, and using oblique techniques and innuendo to slur a position or person without having the courage to stand and do so outright, then hide behind bogus reasons of “I’m in the service I cant say specifically anything”.

    Sorry, your actions and reasoning don’t pass the smell test. Your evasions are suspect, making you suspect.

    Stand. One way or the other.

    At least have the courage to stop this BS evasion and hiding behind military service (which I showed is NOT credible nor required on your part, be you a PFC or a Major General). What pisses me off is you using alleged military service for both credibility and a shield to cover your innuendo and half-truth based attempts here.

    Or do you want to end up like Jesse MacBeth?

    Or maybe you ARE him, philosophically thinking.

  33. #633
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:49 am, Send_Me said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:36 pm, Ordinary Coloradan said:

    Thanks for the conversation. I’m glad we could talk in a civil way about the ethics and legalities pertaining to the tenets of DoD Directive 1344.10 and AR 600-20 that specifically deal with how Service Members (specifically, Soldiers, in my case) can and can’t/shouldn’t participate in the political process and political activities.

Comment pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Dear GOP: Don’t pander to minorities

December 4, 2008 01:42 PM by Michelle Malkin

64 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Brand games.

Deadbeat watch: Troopers still owed overtime for DNC

December 1, 2008 10:56 PM by Michelle Malkin

20 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

California declares “fiscal emergency:” Arnie’s gonna come begging

December 1, 2008 04:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

72 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

I’ll be back…for a bailout.

GOP bailout stooge to Cavuto: “It’s not your money”

November 19, 2008 05:30 AM by Michelle Malkin

105 Comments | 26 Trackbacks

Hubris.

McCain wins…

November 13, 2008 09:31 AM by Michelle Malkin

181 Comments | 1 Trackback

Mandate for change.

Heckuva job, McLame

November 12, 2008 06:38 AM by Michelle Malkin

271 Comments | 19 Trackbacks

Not your friend.


Categories: 2008 campaign, Fred Thompson, GOP, John McCain


Patterico

» Alito Whacks Biden

Weekly Standard

» Why Not Baghdad?