About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

The Four Stages of Conservative Female Abuse

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 3, 2008 07:16 AM

My syndicated column today takes a broader view of those suffering from Palin Derangement Syndrome and assesses the longtime signs and symptoms of progressive Conservative Female Abuse by the Left. Yes, I speak from personal experience. Been there, done that. See also: Unhinged. See-Dubya blogged over the weekend about the Palin-haters’ fake bikini photo mania. Again: Been there, done that. Now, those fake photos of the governor are spreading like kudzu. See here, here, and here. It’s all coming soon to a Democrat rag-masquerading-as-a-tabloid or a Democrat tabloid-masquerading-as-a-manstream newspaper near you.

***

The Four Stages of Conservative Female Abuse
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2008

There’s something about outspoken conservative women that drives the Left mad. It’s a peculiar pathology I’ve reported on for more than 15 years, both as a witness and a target. Thus, the onset of Palin Derangement Syndrome in the media, Democrat circles, and the cesspools of the blogosphere came as no surprise. They just can’t help themselves.

Liberals hold a special animus for constituencies they deem traitors. Minorities who identify as social and economic conservatives have left the plantation and sold out their people. Women who put an “R” by their name have abandoned their ovaries and betrayed their gender. As Republican officeholders and conservative public figures who are women have grown in number and visibility, the progression of Conservative Female Abuse has worsened. The astonishing vitriol and virulent hatred directed at GOP Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is the most severe manifestation to date.

The first stage of Conservative Female Abuse by the Left is infantilization. Right-wing women can’t possibly believe what they believe about the sanctity of life, self-defense, free markets, or foreign policy. They must be submissive little dolls of the White Male Hierarchy. Or, as a far Left (is there any other kind of Left in San Francisco?) San Francisco Chronicle columnist wrote of First Lady Laura Bush, they must be put in their place as “docile doormats” with no brains of their own. True to form, no sooner had John McCain announced Gov. Palin as his veep pick than jeers of “Palin = neocon puppet” sprouted across the Internet.

The second stage of CFA is sexualization. A conservative woman is not merely a sellout. She is an intellectual prostitute. Unable or unwilling to argue with them on the merits, detractors resort to mocking the physical appearance of their ideological opponents in skirts and denigrating them with vulgar epithets. MSNBC hosts insulted former GOP presidential candidate Fred Thompson’s accomplished wife and mother of two, Jeri Thompson, as working the stripper pole. Newspaper cartoonists Ted Rall, Pat Oliphant, and Jeff Danziger caricatured Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice as a mammy, thick-lipped parrot, and Bush “House Nigga” armed with “hair straightener.” New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd derided former GOP Florida secretary of state Katherine Harris for applying “her makeup with a trowel.”

True to form, Dowd was first out of the box to snicker at Gov. Palin’s beauty pageant past, ridicule her “beehive and sexy shoes,” and compare her path to the vice presidential nomination as a “hokey chick flick.” Joe Biden backhandedly praised her as “good looking.” And left-wing bloggers worked overtime on lurid photoshops of Palin as a bikini model and porn star. At the Democratic Underground, a highly trafficked liberal website raising money for Barack Obama, members held a contest to come up with nicknames and posters to slime GOP Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin — and then to “spread [them] all over the ‘net.” Among the “nicer” entries: “Cruella,” “Gidget,” “Governor Jesus Camp,” “VPILF,” “Fertilla the Huntress,” “Iditabroad,” and “KILLER PYSCHO FUNDIE BITCH FROM HELL!!”

The third stage of CFA is demonization. When the Left tires of hurling whore insults, it turns conservative women in the public eye into nefarious creatures. Bill Maher called Laura Bush “Hitler’s dog.” George Carlin attacked Barbara Bush as “the Silver douchebag.” A Huffington Post website member wrote of Nancy Reagan: “Like her evil husband, she has lived far too long. Here’s hoping the hag suffers for several weeks, then croaks in the tub.” Another added: “I feel no pity for the bitch who took delight in watching thousands die of a horrible disease and watching the poor having to eat out of dumpsters because of her husband’s political beliefs.”

True to form, rumors of Palin being a crypto-Nazi surfaced on the Internet and the fringe media. And liberal critics used her gun-rights record to smear her as bloodthirsty.

And the final stage of CFA is dehumanization. Conservative women aren’t real women according to the liberal feminist establishment’s definition. Remember when Gloria Steinem called Texas Republican Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison a “female impersonator?” Or when curdled NOW leader Patricia Ireland instructed Democrats to vote only for “authentic” female political candidates? Or when Al Gore’s fashion consultant Naomi Wolf described the foreign-policy analysis of Jeane Kirkpatrick as being “uninflected by the experiences of the female body?”

Echoing the bottom-feeders in the liberal blogosphere, mainstream journalists and Obama water-carriers now question Palin’s commitment to motherhood and even challenged her pre-natal care decisions in an effort to destroy her. Forget about questioning their patriotism. I question their sanity.

Posted in: Kos, Nutroots, Sarah Palin

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Sarah Palin to Deliver Knock out Punch Tonight: « Riggword Weblog
  2. JammieWearingFool
  3. Snapped Shot
  4. Health Care BS - FEAR OF PALIN & PRESS PSYCHOPATHY
  5. “Conservative Female Abuse” « Gunservatively!
  6. P.D.S. sufferers, there may be help for you, yet. « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
  7. Oinkin’ from the Boinkin’: Sexist Pig Of The Day Award, Sept. 3 « A McCain Democrat’s Journal
  8. The Media are Sexist Bottom Feeders « Musings of Mine
  9. Dewey Napoleon - the only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing » Read this, tell your family and friends, send it to everybody…..expose the tactics of the Left to the light
  10. I have my problems with Michelle Malkin, but dang! « PolitiCatholica
  11. No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » The Morning Scramble - 9/3/2008
  12. No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » The Morning Scramble - 9/3/2008
  13. The Republican Convention « The View from Alexandria
  14. Ditto that | Civil Commotion
  15. BipolarNation.com » Puppets of the Evil White Male Conservative? No.
  16. Stuck On Stupid
  17. Stuck On Stupid
  18. Stuck On Stupid
  19. Feminists Against Palin | novatownhall blog
  20. Welcome To The Liberal Treatment Of Conservative Women » Pirate’s Cove — Barracuda Patrol!
  21. Welcome To The Liberal Treatment Of Conservative Women : Stop The ACLU
  22. Sarah Palin: All Palin All The Time, It’s Her Day, Bitches, Deal With It! « Blog Entry « Dr. Melissa Clouthier
  23. Mike's Noise
  24. Conservative Women - Feminists, No Not That Kind of Feminists « Memoirs From a Young Conservative
  25. What would your mother say? « Belvedere
  26. Bottomfeeders On The Attack «
  27. Sierra Faith
  28. Palin rocks! And, the left panics, P.D.S. rages on, smears continue, etc., etc., etc. « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
  29. Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  30. Oinkin’ From The Boinkin’: Sexist Pig Of The Day Award, September 5 « A McCain Democrat’s Journal
  31. Sexist Pig Of The Day Award . . . REJECTED?!?!? « A McCain Democrat’s Journal
  32. All I share with Gloria Steinem is a chromosome: Thank God! « Retractable Horns & Tail
  33. The process of tearing down conservative women — Cranach: The Blog of Veith
  34. Palin Derangement Syndrome « Grand Rants
  35. Michelle Malkin » Miserable provocateur rails against conservative women again
  36. Caring, compassionate, feminist post-racial Lefty reveals Palin fantasy « The Tizona Group
  37. The difference between a hockey mom and a pitbull is merely lipstick. « .a blog about everything to do with being confused.
  38. Sarah Palin- Fellow Bitch in Arms. « .she’s a bitch.

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 2 [3]

  1. #201
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:29 am, navywife91 said:

    I would be happy never to hear of her again. And, believe me, so would the Obama campaign.

    You are correct.

  2. #202
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:30 am, Socky said:

    It reminds me of the leadership of the Democratic party giggling gleefully over the prospect of a killer hurricane during the RNC convention.

    Your party is thoroughly depraved. I’m not a Republican. I’m not voting McCain. But the Republicans on a bad day are not as disgusting and depraved as the Democrats on a good day.

  3. #203
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:31 am, navywife91 said:

    Because trashing a 17 year old girl for the sake of destroying her mother’s political career is sheer nastiness. And that’s all the left has to offer.

    Nicely put. However, to these types, Bristol is fair game.

  4. #204
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:33 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:17 am, navywife91 said:
    madrassa-educated jihadist
    I’ll denounce that myself. Although you do know he did attend a madrassa.

    Wrong! Fox News irresponsibly reported it last year, then retracted the next day. Barack Obama went to a public school that did not focus on religion. This is completely fabricated, and if people still believe it, then it’s high time for the conservative smear media to set the record straight.

    Here’s a link to John McCain’s outrageous poor humor, and I certainly think the public would like to know what a crude SOB it may be electing.

  5. #205
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:36 am, sambo said:

    Ed Schultz Said That Governor Palin Was An “Empty Pantsuit” Who Had Started A “Bimbo Alert.”

    The democratic party…Nastiness you can believe in!

  6. #206
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:45 am, Speakup said:

    Simply if the media held the left to the same standard they hold the right then some of the outright hate would go away but the MSM actually encourages the emotional vitriol by purposeful omission of utterly despicable acts, writing and cartoons or liberal bias outlets reward ugly behavior with validation and friendly air time.

    But then liberal is as liberal does and an emotional response is basically all they’ve got, they just should be exposed to the light of day honestly for the religion of hate party they really are.

  7. #207
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:48 am, ajmontana said:

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′

    Image: Governor Palin Knocking the socks off American’s tonight.

  8. #208
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:49 am, Socky said:

    I don’t begrudge McCain or Limbaugh making one joke. An orchestrated campaign to destroy a family is a whole ‘nother thing.

  9. #209
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:50 am, BemusedLib said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:28 am, Socky said:

    why is it wrong to hold up her getting pregnant in the first place as an example of weak family values?

    Because trashing a 17 year old girl for the sake of destroying her mother’s political career is sheer nastiness. And that’s all the left has to offer.

    You selectively edited, I said that if her keeping the baby could be used as an example of the family’s strong values, then….

    Baby Palin is either in play or not. You can’t have it both ways.

    And now, to paraphrase Homer Simpson, let us never speak of her again.

  10. #210
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:55 am, Mister P said:

    What we are seeing is that the RADICAL left is not the extreme wing of the Democratic Party. They ARE the Democratic Party.

  11. #211
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:57 am, navywife91 said:

    Wrong! Fox News irresponsibly reported it last year, then retracted the next day. Barack Obama went to a public school that did not focus on religion. This is completely fabricated, and if people still believe it, then it’s high time for the conservative smear media to set the record straight.

    Insight Magazine, which is owned by the same company as The Washington Times, reported on its Web site last week that associates of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-New York, had unearthed information the Illinois Democrat and likely presidential candidate attended a Muslim religious school known for teaching the most fundamentalist form of Islam.

    Not exactly a right-wing, smear machine, that Clinton campaign.
    Actually, I didn’t hear it on Fox, so don’t pretend they are the only ones who reported it. Personally, it means nothing to me, so you’re barking up the wrong tree.

  12. #212
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:59 am, Mister P said:

    Take back that Obama was educated in a madrassa? why? its a FACT….oh and for those idiots who think madrassa is an insult it is what SCHOOLS are called in the Arab world…..we just call them schools.

    NEVER apologize for the truth even if it HURTS.

    You mean in countries that don’t separate religion from the state?

  13. #213
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:00 pm, Socky said:

    Baby Palin is either in play or not. You can’t have it both ways.

    That’s how you justify the nastiness and hatred in your party? My conscience would not allow me to do that. I wonder about yours.

  14. #214
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:02 pm, FamilyMan said:

    BemusedLib I’m sorry if my response was taken as name calling. Words are a difficult media to express emotions. I enjoy your posts although I don’t agree with them.
    Convoluted dialectic detergency is a very old college debating term. I think my age is showing. Next time I will respond with language that is more mutually compatible.

  15. #215
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:03 pm, navywife91 said:

    Here’s a link to John McCain’s outrageous poor humor, and I certainly think the public would like to know what a crude SOB it may be electing.

    Wow, I guess you’ve never told any crude jokes? I guess we could go back and investigate all the previous presidents and vice presidents to see if they told any offensive jokes. Heck, let’s make sure that anyone who has ever told an offensive and crude joke never gets elected. BTW, the link didn’t provide the joke, so I still don’t know what it is and at this point, I don’t really care.

  16. #216
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:05 pm, guitarplayer said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:20 am, BemusedLib said:
    No, up until now, McCain (and Hillary) were making experience a big issue. And Lieberman touched on it again last night. Obama was clearly on the defensive and responding with the best he had. Not, to some minds, enough, but not nothing either.

    So, are you saying that none of the candidates should talk about their experience? That no one should bother to discuss what they’ve accomplished/failed at in the past?

  17. #217
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:08 pm, sambo said:

    BemusedLib said:
    I said that if her keeping the baby could be used as an example of the family’s strong values, then….

    Baby Palin is either in play or not. You can’t have it both ways.

    I guess that goes to Obama’s kids as well? Photo ops, magazines, TV shows, DNC convention?
    “So these kids could be used as an examle of the Obama family’s strong values”….

  18. #218
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:08 pm, NY Andy said:

    familyman,

    If you are still around, I’d like to correct some mis-information I gave you the other day.

    The McCain campaign contributions are now being split between the RNC, some state committees, and the McCain compliance fund.

    According to the person I just spoke to at McCain - Palin, after he is officially nominated and the general election begins, the donations will once again go to the campaign.

    That woman also said the fundraising is going very well.

  19. #219
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:08 pm, BemusedLib said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:02 pm, FamilyMan said:
    BemusedLib I’m sorry if my response was taken as name calling. Words are a difficult media to express emotions. I enjoy your posts although I don’t agree with them.
    Convoluted dialectic detergency is a very old college debating term. I think my age is showing. Next time I will respond with language that is more mutually compatible.

    Nah, I didn’t notice name calling. I just figured that this was a euphamism for…God knows what, and was curious. Or maybe a typo. At least you’re nor resorting to emoticons and multiple exclamation points!!!!!;-)

    And, had it been name calling, it would at least have been a change of pace from the names I’m usually called.

    Cheers

  20. #220
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:11 pm, navywife91 said:

    Baby Palin is either in play or not. You can’t have it both ways.

    I don’t really understand you. That is the most ignorant statement I have ever read from you. The “baby” doesn’t have jack to do with this election and you’re only digging yourself a hole. That has absolutely nothing to do with the family’s strong values. Kids make mistakes and I don’t know any conservative who thinks they or their families are perfect. We just have different views. None of us are proud that the daughter is pregnant, but proud that she is being responsible. You don’t know if she was on the pill or not. I was and got pregnant. But somehow, this is reasoning for why it’s an issue (birth control/ sex ed). Keep on being tacky and slimey and see where it gets you. D.W.Y.

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′

  21. #221
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:11 pm, Socky said:

    Bemused Lib, maybe you should lay off Palin’s family, like your messiah has asked you to. If you still feel the need to be nasty, maybe you and Dan Fowler can fly to Baton Rouge and laugh at hurricane victims.

  22. #222
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:20 pm, navywife91 said:

    Wow, the MSM wants paternity tests for Trig. What say you now, trolls?

  23. #223
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:22 pm, navywife91 said:

    Michelle,

    Wow, the MSM wants paternity tests for Trig.

    Is this another stage in Conservative Female Abuse?

  24. #224
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:25 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Is this another stage in Conservative Female Abuse?

    yup.

    Put on your seatbelts; it’s going to be a bumpy night.

  25. #225
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:25 pm, guitarplayer said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:20 pm, navywife91 said:

    Wow, the MSM wants paternity tests for Trig. What say you now, trolls?

    Got a link for that yet, Navy? I would like a read of it.

  26. #226
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:29 pm, navywife91 said:

    I heard it on Fox news and on Rush. Steve Schmidt, McCain representative stated that she has had many MSM outlets contacting him and requesting DNA. I think the memo, ad or press conference later today will answer the questions. Let me see if I can find something in the way of a link.

  27. #227
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:30 pm, navywife91 said:
  28. #228
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:33 pm, William Teach said:

    How can we question their sanity? We can’t question something the Left has never had.

  29. #229
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:33 pm, navywife91 said:

    Kurtz writes that Markos Moulitsas, the founder of the Daily Kos, believes the made up allegations against Palin and her daughter are legitimate. Kurtz fails to note that Moulitsas writes for the Post’s sister publication, Newsweek.

    Don’t try to conflate two or three liberal bloggers (even Markos said he was offended by the posts on his site) with the Democratic party.

    Hey, REDSTATE! I thought Mr. Kos denounced this crap!

    The hole is getting deeper.

  30. #230
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:33 pm, guitarplayer said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:30 pm, navywife91 said:

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2073475/posts

    try this.

    Thanks, Navy.

    The MSM, Kos, and their minions can get bent! This is just totally disgraceful. Non-biased media my foot.

    Tell them they can have their DNA test when we get a copy of Obama’s birth certificate.

  31. #231
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:35 pm, sambo said:

    This just makes me wonder aloud…
    Why is it the left always loses the moral and ethics issues in every election?

  32. #232
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:37 pm, navywife91 said:

    This is a little OT, but Rush just played clips from Sally Quinn, noted feminist. She said Bristol is going to need her mother in the next few months (because she’s pregnant), so she doesn’t need to be running for VP. This is so funny because I’m going to go out on a limb and say she is against parental notification for an abortion, in which case she doesn’t need her mother. Can you say hypocrisy????

    It’s so funny to listen to a feminist refer to children as a distraction.

    Witch.

  33. #233
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:40 pm, Socky said:

    Why is it the left always loses the moral and ethics issues in every election?

    Because as Rusty, lgm, DerangedLib, and RedStarSkeptic demonstrate, the left has neither morals nor ethics.

  34. #234
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:43 pm, guitarplayer said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:40 pm, Socky said:

    Because as Rusty, lgm, DerangedLib, and RedStarSkeptic demonstrate, the left has neither morals nor ethics.

    Morals and ethics get in the way of things like allowing them to have a “choice” in pregnancy.

  35. #235
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:50 pm, erikwhittington said:

    Leftist Lauren Sandler attacked my wife in her book, “Righteous: Dispatches from the Evangelical Youth Movement.” Oh well…

  36. #236
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:50 pm, Flarn said:

    So Joe Biden is “change” and Sarah Palin is not?

  37. #237
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:52 pm, FamilyMan said:

    BemusedLib: I sometimes will use !!!!!!!! or Strong to try to convey emotions. It all depends on the opponent. We may have a common language , but our political views must come totally different backgrounds. I normally prefer to argue my point using constitutional perspectives. The language is more precise by necessity.

  38. #238
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:54 pm, guitarplayer said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:37 pm, navywife91 said:

    It’s so funny to listen to a feminist refer to children as a distraction.

    They didn’t say that for Nancy Pelosi. The MSMs are going after Palin for being a politician and having 5 kids. Anyone care to take a shot at how many kids Pelosi has?

  39. #239
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:58 pm, navywife91 said:

    They didn’t say that for Nancy Pelosi. The MSMs are going after Palin for being a politician and having 5 kids. Anyone care to take a shot at how many kids Pelosi has?

    You know that if you tried to post this on DU, you’d be deleted.

  40. #240
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:00 pm, sambo said:

    VP Palin, will you please write a boot to my daughter for me. You can name it “Know Your Power- a Message to America’s Daughter.” since a book has never be sold under that title.

    Thank you!

  41. #241
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:01 pm, ScoopPC11 said:

    I love watching supposed “feminists” dig themselves into a deeper and deeper hole when they try to attack a woman who doesn’t believe the same as they do.

    I don’t see what Bristol’s pregnancy has to do with her running for VP. Neither should anyone else — they extended this courtesy to the Clintons and Gores when they were in office. The same rules should apply if it is a Republican over a Democrat.

  42. #242
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:03 pm, guitarplayer said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:58 pm, navywife91 said:

    They didn’t say that for Nancy Pelosi. The MSMs are going after Palin for being a politician and having 5 kids. Anyone care to take a shot at how many kids Pelosi has?

    You know that if you tried to post this on DU, you’d be deleted.

    Ha! Why would I waste my brain cells over there?

    Besides, liberals don’t like facts. Facts get in the way of their agendas.

  43. #243
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:05 pm, Salt said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:07 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    … most of the country doesn’t know that the man on the verge of leading the free world is such a well-documented asshole.

    Same could have been said about President Clinton.

  44. #244
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:07 pm, Socky said:

    I imagine Queen Nan of Botoxia is pretty scared sh-tless at the prospect of being the second most powerful woman in Washington. Do you think her mummy-like fingerprints might be on some of the Palin smears?

  45. #245
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 2:23 pm, dakine said:

    I offer up Socky at #239 as evidence that the buffoons on both the extreme right and the extreme left are guilty of ugly ad hominem attacks. The irony and hypocrisy around here and the lefty sites never fails to entertain.

  46. #246
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 2:30 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    if you were an admissions officer — or a parent — and you took a chance on/raised a kid like that, you’d have a right to be pretty damn pleased.

    Sure, but you’re not saying this is “executive experience” are you?

  47. #247
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 2:31 pm, greenfairie said:

    The Left wants only one thing and that’s power. It will do anything to get it and destroy anything in its path.

    There was a time months ago when I got an upset stomach at the idea of having to choose between McAmnesty and the Hildebeast. Now, for all of McCain’s flaws, even if Sarah Palin wasn’t the VP candidate, this is about something bigger than any one issue. WE CANNOT LET OBAMA AND HIS THUGGERY TAKE CHARGE OF THIS COUNTRY! If you thought Filegate, Travelgate, and IRS audits of prominent Republicans/conservatives were bad under the Clintons, you haven’t seen anything yet. People are going to be destroyed if they so much as look at Obama funny. Not only will the Fairness Doctrine put Rush and Co. off the air, they’ll probably get put in jail under trumped up charges. Wait until you guys lose your jobs because you visit “hate sites.” Wait until your cable company is pressured by the government into dropping FoxNews.

    See those pieces of crap in the streets of St. Paul lobbing feces and bleach at Republicans? Those are going to be the people in charge of your country very soon.

  48. #248
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 2:31 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I offer up Socky at #239 as evidence that the buffoons on both the extreme right and the extreme left are guilty of ugly ad hominem attacks.

    True, but have we asked her for DNA of her kids to compare against her husband?

  49. #249
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 2:32 pm, Socky said:

    I offer up dakine at #240 as evidence that cousins shouldn’t marry.

  50. #250
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 2:57 pm, spidgy said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:23 am, guitarplayer said:
    …They seem to run on nothing but their hatred of ideals contrary to their own and the people who stand for those ideals.

    Quick! Who is being described here?

    A. Liberals
    B. Al Qaeda
    C. NYT Editorial staff

  51. #251
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 2:59 pm, Socky said:

    A. Liberals
    B. Al Qaeda
    C. NYT Editorial staff

    Isn’t that really three of the same thing?

  52. #252
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 3:03 pm, PersonalLiberty said:

    Amen. Well said, Michelle.

  53. #253
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 3:32 pm, happy2behere said:

    The vicious attacks are great! Shows who they really are. Does it really surprise you that Maureeen Dowd got snarky about somene who didn’t agree with her? She’s funny and pathetic at the same time because she can’t make a point any other way. Take heart, this nonsense it a good thing.

  54. #254
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 3:35 pm, dakine said:

    C’mon Socky, you can do better than that. My 6 year old comes up with better schoolyard stuff than that.

    AG, I can’t give you a contra example off the top of my head, but I view the extremes on both the left and the right in pretty much the same way. Rigid unthinking ideologues. An inability to move off of locked in views that seem to come out of some sort of manual. Constant use of hyperbole and demagoguery. Misrepresenting and cherry picking facts to suit a particular agenda. Constant use of mean-spirited personal attacks on those with whom they disagree. Both extremes are the same to me, and I view them as dangerous and entertaining at the same time. One of the reasons I drop in here and dKos most days.

  55. #255
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 3:38 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    This whole event reminds me of Al Sharpton when he screams racism

  56. #256
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:31 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    I denounce it. Now let’s hear Michelle Malkin or any conservative blogger, TV guy or talk radio host denounce smears calling Barack Obama a madrassa-educated jihadist.

    Are you this vocal and demanding over at HuffPo and Kos? How are you equivalent to Michelle or any other conservative blogger in stature?

  57. #257
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:38 pm, 24Klady said:

    Michelle, read this article this AM on Jewish World Review - without doubt, one of your finest yet. You just get better and better…thank you. :)

  58. #258
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:47 pm, txvet2 said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:42 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    Yeah, but Obama will still take donations from those bottom-dwellers and show up at KOS conventions. It was a classy statement, but actions speak louder than words.

    Y’all please spare me. Rush Limbaugh called Chelsea Clinton the “white house dog,” and John McCain said Clelsea was so ugly because her father was Janet Reno. That’s not a remote connection, that IS the Republican Party.

    That was many years ago, but as I recall, it wasn’t a comment on her appearance, it was the way the Clintons used her as a prop, like Nixon (and FDR, I believe), among others,used his dog.

  59. #259
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:11 pm, Socky said:

    The worst you can say about the AIP is that Sarah Palin had a tangential (at most) relationship with them, and their furthest objective was to get the Federal government to back off so that people could manage their own affairs.

    Trinity United and Reverend Wright, on the other hand, had an intimate and influential relationship with Barack Obama, and their furthest objective would be to use the power of the government to enact retribution against those who had “wronged” them, and enforce their Marxist worldview on everybody through the power of government.

    That, in a nutshell, is the difference between the extreme right and the extreme left.

  60. #260
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:13 pm, Socky said:

    Rush Limbaugh ad McCain made a joke… that is a completely different thing than using the collective might of the mainstream media to try and destroy a family.

    The desperate lengths trolls have to go to to make moral equivalence is mind-boggling. I wonder if they have any capacity for honest debate at all.

  61. #261
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:20 pm, TXRose said:

    Since the MSM vetted BO…oh..wait….they haven’t vetted BO. It just seems to me to be
    fair to dig as deeply into Bo’s background as they are Gov Palin’s. You cannot. If
    anyone tries to dig into BO’s background ugly things start happening to you don’t they?
    I know dems who are decent people, who deplore what is happening with Gov Palin’s
    family. Fortunately, I don’t know the other kind. If I did, they would get an earful
    about what is going on here. All I can say is what so many others have said before
    me. Boy Are They Running Scared!!!!
    They thought BO was going to waltz into the White House without opposition. Now,
    it’s a real life fight for the Presidency. Now we hear, “It’s not fair!!! It’s our turn!!!”

  62. #262
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:49 pm, 24Klady said:

    If the various websites and sleaze mags respect and admire Obambi as much as they claim, they’d pull in the reins on the Palin family. If they don’t they won’t vote for him anyways. The last option is that it’s being orchestrated with deniability by the campaign. Down the road, it’ll be the Annointed One that takes the brunt of criticism, no matter which way the wind blows. It simply takes too many votes to put him in office and his base doesn’t weild that many. Have you ever seen a presidential candidate run against the VP nominee? All McCain has to do is sit back and let her rip the Obamamaniacs. I’ve no fear she won’t/can’t do it either. ;)

  63. #263
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:33 pm, emjem24 said:

    Liberals won’t be satisfied until they totally destroy Sarah Palin. They may congratulate her to her face, and make empty gestures of “good for you!,” while behind her back the long knives come out.

    Now I know how Caesar felt before he died.

  64. #264
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:40 pm, emjem24 said:

    GladzKravtz said:
    I offer a 5th stage: being frozen out. Speaking your mind (ones involving conservative opinions) will end friendships (ok, maybe they weren’t real friends but I thought they were).

    I completely agree with you, Gladyz. I actually lost friends when I married my military husband. I thought these were lasting friendships (especially from college) and they turned out not to be.

    It’s even worse with family. I married into a passel of liberals. My parents-in-law are conservative like me but my husband’s siblings are another story. As I’ve said in other threads, I have two sisters-in-law who are one issue voters: gun control and abortion.

    All conservative females can do is band together and support each other when the chips are down and liberals cut us dead. That’s okay though, I’ve gotten used to it both from friends I thought I knew, to in-laws, to even close personal family.

  65. #265
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:26 am, love2rumba said:

    emjem24, I know what you’ve gone through with liberal inlaws, even though I am a guy.

Comment pages: « 1 2 [3]

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Palin power in Georgia; Democrats counter with…Ludacris

December 1, 2008 02:38 PM by Michelle Malkin

44 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

‘Cuda vs. Luda.

Obama wants his Blackberry back

November 26, 2008 09:49 AM by Michelle Malkin

109 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Keeping in touch with the little people.

Palin wins…

November 17, 2008 10:47 AM by Michelle Malkin

49 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Attention, Howard Kurtz

November 13, 2008 10:27 AM by Michelle Malkin

48 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Fight the smears.

Memo to McCain blabbermouths: Character is destiny

November 7, 2008 07:00 AM by Michelle Malkin

271 Comments | 21 Trackbacks

Send a message to Sarah Palin

November 6, 2008 12:57 PM by Michelle Malkin

145 Comments | 24 Trackbacks

The McCain campaign’s classless cowards; Update: Palin reacts

November 5, 2008 10:29 PM by Michelle Malkin

696 Comments | 102 Trackbacks

In defense of Sarah Palin.

Palin cleared by independent counsel

November 3, 2008 08:58 PM by Michelle Malkin

99 Comments | 15 Trackbacks


Categories: Kos, Nutroots, Sarah Palin


Patterico

» Alito Whacks Biden

Weekly Standard

» Why Not Baghdad?