The Four Stages of Conservative Female Abuse

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 3, 2008 07:16 AM

My syndicated column today takes a broader view of those suffering from Palin Derangement Syndrome and assesses the longtime signs and symptoms of progressive Conservative Female Abuse by the Left. Yes, I speak from personal experience. Been there, done that. See also: Unhinged. See-Dubya blogged over the weekend about the Palin-haters’ fake bikini photo mania. Again: Been there, done that. Now, those fake photos of the governor are spreading like kudzu. See here, here, and here. It’s all coming soon to a Democrat rag-masquerading-as-a-tabloid or a Democrat tabloid-masquerading-as-a-manstream newspaper near you.

***

The Four Stages of Conservative Female Abuse
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2008

There’s something about outspoken conservative women that drives the Left mad. It’s a peculiar pathology I’ve reported on for more than 15 years, both as a witness and a target. Thus, the onset of Palin Derangement Syndrome in the media, Democrat circles, and the cesspools of the blogosphere came as no surprise. They just can’t help themselves.

Liberals hold a special animus for constituencies they deem traitors. Minorities who identify as social and economic conservatives have left the plantation and sold out their people. Women who put an “R” by their name have abandoned their ovaries and betrayed their gender. As Republican officeholders and conservative public figures who are women have grown in number and visibility, the progression of Conservative Female Abuse has worsened. The astonishing vitriol and virulent hatred directed at GOP Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is the most severe manifestation to date.

The first stage of Conservative Female Abuse by the Left is infantilization. Right-wing women can’t possibly believe what they believe about the sanctity of life, self-defense, free markets, or foreign policy. They must be submissive little dolls of the White Male Hierarchy. Or, as a far Left (is there any other kind of Left in San Francisco?) San Francisco Chronicle columnist wrote of First Lady Laura Bush, they must be put in their place as “docile doormats” with no brains of their own. True to form, no sooner had John McCain announced Gov. Palin as his veep pick than jeers of “Palin = neocon puppet” sprouted across the Internet.

The second stage of CFA is sexualization. A conservative woman is not merely a sellout. She is an intellectual prostitute. Unable or unwilling to argue with them on the merits, detractors resort to mocking the physical appearance of their ideological opponents in skirts and denigrating them with vulgar epithets. MSNBC hosts insulted former GOP presidential candidate Fred Thompson’s accomplished wife and mother of two, Jeri Thompson, as working the stripper pole. Newspaper cartoonists Ted Rall, Pat Oliphant, and Jeff Danziger caricatured Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice as a mammy, thick-lipped parrot, and Bush “House Nigga” armed with “hair straightener.” New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd derided former GOP Florida secretary of state Katherine Harris for applying “her makeup with a trowel.”

True to form, Dowd was first out of the box to snicker at Gov. Palin’s beauty pageant past, ridicule her “beehive and sexy shoes,” and compare her path to the vice presidential nomination as a “hokey chick flick.” Joe Biden backhandedly praised her as “good looking.” And left-wing bloggers worked overtime on lurid photoshops of Palin as a bikini model and porn star. At the Democratic Underground, a highly trafficked liberal website raising money for Barack Obama, members held a contest to come up with nicknames and posters to slime GOP Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin — and then to “spread [them] all over the ‘net.” Among the “nicer” entries: “Cruella,” “Gidget,” “Governor Jesus Camp,” “VPILF,” “Fertilla the Huntress,” “Iditabroad,” and “KILLER PYSCHO FUNDIE BITCH FROM HELL!!”

The third stage of CFA is demonization. When the Left tires of hurling whore insults, it turns conservative women in the public eye into nefarious creatures. Bill Maher called Laura Bush “Hitler’s dog.” George Carlin attacked Barbara Bush as “the Silver douchebag.” A Huffington Post website member wrote of Nancy Reagan: “Like her evil husband, she has lived far too long. Here’s hoping the hag suffers for several weeks, then croaks in the tub.” Another added: “I feel no pity for the bitch who took delight in watching thousands die of a horrible disease and watching the poor having to eat out of dumpsters because of her husband’s political beliefs.”

True to form, rumors of Palin being a crypto-Nazi surfaced on the Internet and the fringe media. And liberal critics used her gun-rights record to smear her as bloodthirsty.

And the final stage of CFA is dehumanization. Conservative women aren’t real women according to the liberal feminist establishment’s definition. Remember when Gloria Steinem called Texas Republican Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison a “female impersonator?” Or when curdled NOW leader Patricia Ireland instructed Democrats to vote only for “authentic” female political candidates? Or when Al Gore’s fashion consultant Naomi Wolf described the foreign-policy analysis of Jeane Kirkpatrick as being “uninflected by the experiences of the female body?”

Echoing the bottom-feeders in the liberal blogosphere, mainstream journalists and Obama water-carriers now question Palin’s commitment to motherhood and even challenged her pre-natal care decisions in an effort to destroy her. Forget about questioning their patriotism. I question their sanity.

Posted in: Kos, Nutroots, Sarah Palin

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Sarah Palin to Deliver Knock out Punch Tonight: « Riggword Weblog
  2. JammieWearingFool
  3. Snapped Shot
  4. Health Care BS - FEAR OF PALIN & PRESS PSYCHOPATHY
  5. “Conservative Female Abuse” « Gunservatively!
  6. P.D.S. sufferers, there may be help for you, yet. « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
  7. Oinkin’ from the Boinkin’: Sexist Pig Of The Day Award, Sept. 3 « A McCain Democrat’s Journal
  8. The Media are Sexist Bottom Feeders « Musings of Mine
  9. Dewey Napoleon - the only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing » Read this, tell your family and friends, send it to everybody…..expose the tactics of the Left to the light
  10. I have my problems with Michelle Malkin, but dang! « PolitiCatholica
  11. No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » The Morning Scramble - 9/3/2008
  12. No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » The Morning Scramble - 9/3/2008
  13. The Republican Convention « The View from Alexandria
  14. Ditto that | Civil Commotion
  15. BipolarNation.com » Puppets of the Evil White Male Conservative? No.
  16. Stuck On Stupid
  17. Stuck On Stupid
  18. Stuck On Stupid
  19. Feminists Against Palin | novatownhall blog
  20. Welcome To The Liberal Treatment Of Conservative Women » Pirate’s Cove — Barracuda Patrol!
  21. Welcome To The Liberal Treatment Of Conservative Women : Stop The ACLU
  22. Sarah Palin: All Palin All The Time, It’s Her Day, Bitches, Deal With It! « Blog Entry « Dr. Melissa Clouthier
  23. Mike's Noise
  24. Conservative Women - Feminists, No Not That Kind of Feminists « Memoirs From a Young Conservative
  25. What would your mother say? « Belvedere
  26. Bottomfeeders On The Attack «
  27. Sierra Faith
  28. Palin rocks! And, the left panics, P.D.S. rages on, smears continue, etc., etc., etc. « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
  29. Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  30. Oinkin’ From The Boinkin’: Sexist Pig Of The Day Award, September 5 « A McCain Democrat’s Journal
  31. Sexist Pig Of The Day Award . . . REJECTED?!?!? « A McCain Democrat’s Journal
  32. All I share with Gloria Steinem is a chromosome: Thank God! « Retractable Horns & Tail
  33. The process of tearing down conservative women — Cranach: The Blog of Veith
  34. Palin Derangement Syndrome « Grand Rants
  35. Michelle Malkin » Miserable provocateur rails against conservative women again
  36. Caring, compassionate, feminist post-racial Lefty reveals Palin fantasy « The Tizona Group
  37. The difference between a hockey mom and a pitbull is merely lipstick. « .a blog about everything to do with being confused.
  38. Sarah Palin- Fellow Bitch in Arms. « .she’s a bitch.
  39. Playboy: Now With More Misogyny! : Jenn Q. Public
  40. Michelle Malkin » David Letterman: Perv
  41. David Letterman: Perv – Michelle Malkin « Sarah Palin Blog
  42. The NAGs Try to Regain Relevance « AmeriCAN-DO Attitude

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #435486
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:23 am, guitarplayer said:

    Wow! What a powerful article, Michelle. This is a must-read for anyone voting this year. It shows what the base of the democrats is really like. They seem to run on nothing but their hatred of ideals contrary to their own and the people who stand for those ideals.

  2. #435488
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:27 am, pubscout said:

    The anti-Palin frenzy on the Left is proof positive that she was a homerun pick.

  3. #435490
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:28 am, twiggman said:

    How do these people look in the mirror?

  4. #435491
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:29 am, labwrs said:

    As always Michelle, you have nailed this! I have become increasingly annoyed the past few days over this. Had it been contained to the nutroots, perhaps it would not have bothered me so much but bleeding over into (what laughably!) constitutes our MSM, it fills me with despair. I only HOPE that SP stands tall and strong (as YOU did) while under attack! Go forward, never look back AND WIN!

  5. #435492
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:29 am, navywife91 said:

    Michelle,
    This was a wonderful column! It’s got me so fired up this morning! People in our country have a short attention span and you have all of those wonderful links to remind everyone of the bias and hypocracy of the left. I am going to forward this to everyone I know in hopes that they can use it as a tool to combat the PDS that they might encounter every day.

  6. #435495
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:34 am, EonTopaz10 said:

    Way to go Michelle! You have quantified every one of your points in a manner that my 5yr old could understand, meaning it will still be a mental stretch for any of the Kossacks or other MSM types to understand.

  7. #435496
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:34 am, PatriotRider said:

    What do you expect from a party of pantywaists?

  8. #435501
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:39 am, SuzEQCitizen said:

    While true to the last sentence and punctuation mark, it is still a sad commentary on the depths that the left has sunk to.

    I have never been one to use the terms nutroots, moonbats, and the like. But at this stage of the game, given the utter filth that is being spewed from the left…well, if the shoe fits, Cinderella.

    I’m still just so freaking sad, though…:(

  9. #435503
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:40 am, TxSkirt said:

    I was a tepid McCain supporter. Meaning I was going to vote for him, but do nothing to promote him. After Fred Thompson’s speech last night and this column this morning, I am a changed woman. I feel now we have something to vote for not just vote against. Way to rally the troops, MM.

  10. #435504
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:42 am, navywife91 said:

    I just forwarded this article to friends, family, etc. Even some possible Obama supporters.

  11. #435505
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:42 am, WarEagle82 said:

    McCain should have known this was coming. “Race and Gender traitors” are obviously completely unacceptable to the unhinged lunatics of the left.

    Every good liberal knows that a “real” African Americans or females can only be authentic if they believe the party line. The very notion that there are conservative women and African Americans is impossible for them to accept and those who refuse to be good liberals must be destroyed.

    They did it to Thomas and they will try to do it to Palin. I just hope we, as a nation, can see through their vile and obscene sexist and racist ranting.

  12. #435506
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:43 am, bloghooligan said:

    I read on an Amazon message board that the science was in: race was a social construct. I think too, gender will become a social construction, where the women will be considered democrats, and the men republican. Because only recently have I learned that you’re only a true woman if you are Pro-choice and pro-Palestinian. Go Figure.

  13. #435507
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:44 am, ajmontana said:

    They F.E.A.R. H.E.R.

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′

  14. #435510
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:47 am, navywife91 said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:44 am, ajmontana said:
    They F.E.A.R. H.E.R.

    You’re so right, aj. I think it was Rusty who said that it was a horrible pick for McCain and we “hardcore” supporters just can’t see the writing on the wall. I think that if they were ignoring Palin, we’d have a problem. The mere fact that they are attacking her with such ferocity is a testament to your quote above. I just really feel sorry for her family, but I think they must be strong enough to deal with the lies, otherwise they wouldn’t be in politics.

  15. #435511
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:51 am, WalterMitty said:

    The Left doesn’t really care about these issues, their hope is that they can undermine the person with the Conservative base and thereby keep/get/retain their power.

    The Left is the American Taliban, enforcing rules on others they themselves will not observe. All in the name of power for themselves to create a more “perfect” society.

    To paraphrase Michelle Obama; for the first time in my life I am proud of John McCain.

    I was going to hold my nose and vote against Obama/Biden, but now, I’ll be at the voting booth when it opens to vote for America’s first Woman Vice President and our future first Woman President.

  16. #435512
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:52 am, Sidana said:

    So the real question IS… what are we going to do?

    They have had this well oiled attack machine in motion for so long.

    I don’t want to be the same as them, but there has to be a way to get the message out just as clearly as they manage their lies.

    Anyone have any ideas?

  17. #435515
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:54 am, fluffy said:

    WarEagle82 @ 7:42 AM

    They did it to Thomas and they will try to do it to Palin.

    The Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings was the first time I remember seeing this kind of non-sense.

    Let these idiots rage. I want to see Gov. Palin pummel Greasy Joe in a debate.

  18. #435516
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:57 am, SuzEQCitizen said:

    I’ve found that when speaking with libs it is best to pose all speech in the interrogative. In other words, I ask questions…over and over and over again. My (prolly naive) hopes are that the person with whom I am speaking will come to an understanding when they answer the question. You know…the old light bulb moment.

    However, what I am getting from reading the lib blogs, DK, and other lib media, is that they have their fingers in their collective ears, spewing spittle as they scream lalalalalalalala.

  19. #435518
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:57 am, Daria said:

    As usual, another strong, insightful column, Michelle. These people are beyond reprehensible, and in my humble opinion, the silent majority will demonstrate their displeasure with them on November 4. I think Rush had it right when he made that prediction on his show yesterday.

    BTW, did anyone see Bob Beckel this morning on FOX? He actually drew a false parallel between that New Yorker cover, which was actually a slam against conservatives and their perceived views of Obama, and US Weekly’s utterly despicable Sarah Palin hit-job. It was Alan Colmes-like in its contortions.

    I can’t wait for Sarah to hit it out of the park tonight. Go barracuda! :)

  20. #435522
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:59 am, FamilyMan said:

    Hey. Stop it. I like that fake photo of Sarah.

  21. #435524
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:00 am, ajmontana said:

    They are strong, no worries.
    Governor Palin is one tough gal, she can and will take it to em tonight.

    Sarah being Sarah is all she needs to do, all these so called experts on the news this morning saying she need to do this that and the other thing.. phooey!
    She just needs to be Sarah.
    Some dipstick said she needed to say what changes they are going to bring to the White House, ok, fine I agree, lets here one time from Mr. O’ Hopey Changey on the same topic. lol, that was quite funny actually…. Obama has said nothing on specifics… nothing but Blah, Blah Hope, change hip hop.

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!

    McCain/Palin 08′
    the trolls libs and Dems are about to have their lunch handed to them. 8)

  22. #435525
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:01 am, navywife91 said:

    BTW, did anyone see Bob Beckel this morning on FOX? He actually drew a false parallel between that New Yorker cover, which was actually a slam against conservatives and their perceived views of Obama, and US Weekly’s utterly despicable Sarah Palin hit-job. It was Alan Colmes-like in its contortions.

    I heard it as well, but what do you expect? The moral equivalency thing belongs to them exclusively. Too bad someone wasn’t there to dispute it properly. I also heard another commentator ( I didn’t see them, so I don’t know who it was) say that the liberals get it just as bad. WTF?

  23. #435527
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:03 am, graysonret said:

    Since the left can’t defend Obama and his support for the Ayers, it seems some have decided to “level” the field with this:
    http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/54027.html

    I used to like HistoryNet, but the site has decided that it wants to play politics instead of history.

  24. #435531
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:06 am, FamilyMan said:

    Remember, to the extreme feminist left, having five children means your husband has raped you five time. Let this sociopaths keep it up. Their hanging themselves.

  25. #435534
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:09 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:01 am, navywife91 said:
    I also heard another commentator ( I didn’t see them, so I don’t know who it was) say that the liberals get it just as bad. WTF?

    To them, anyone daring to question liberals based on the facts is a hate-based attack. So, in that regards, they have it just as bad. :roll:

  26. #435536
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:09 am, Daria said:

    And yes, Fred(!) did us all proud last night. I was jumping up and down and cheering as if I was at an Eagles game. :)

    I do agree with Nina Easton on one thing, though. In spite of some differences with President Bush and as much as I loved the Reagan tribute, I would have liked to have seen some sort of tribute to W., focusing on the War on Terror. Especially in light of the awesome news regarding Anbar Province, that would’ve been an excellent chance to remind America that the man has kept us safe since 9/11. They could’ve tied that in with McCain’s call for the surge.

    And another (slightly OT) thing: Mort Kondracke continues to display a complete lack of awareness regarding the Sarah Palin pick, deriding her as “far right.” Does he actually believe that the 12% of the population that call themselves “independents” would carry McCain to victory if much of the Republican base stayed home? No one challenged him on his assertion, not even Kristol, which kind of surprised me.

    Mort was just so ticked off that his buddy Joe Lieberman didn’t get the VP nod. He was actually mad that the crowd gave Joe a warm reception and yet would’ve been opposed to his selection as VP. Does he not get that while conservatives admire Joe for his pro-America foreign policy stance, there is little else we agree with him on? Or that conservative audiences (unlike most liberal ones)are capable of being respectful and polite?

  27. #435537
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:10 am, Marc said:

    Regarding Maureen Dowd, Dowd is even far worse. She was posing as a political reporter for the New York Times back in 1984 when Geraldine Ferraro was nominated to VP by Mondale. At that time, Gerry was regarded as a liberal hero (That was before Obama called Gerry a racist and the
    MSM went along with Obama). Dowd wrote article after article about the hypnotic effect Gerry had on the voter, how people swooned over her. The articles are all still available. She even wrote one front page article for the times with the blaring headline: “On the hustins, she’s terrific”. Dowd detailed how Gerry went to Hartford, Ct to campaign and grown men, tough working class guys, were practically swooning and fainting over Gerry. Of course, Reagan took Ct. by a landslide so that shows how “objective” Dowd was, then and now.
    On the subject of Dowd, she was quitely corrected by the Times when she wrote a false story about how a Democratic congressman supposedly asked General Petraeus about why there were so few Democrats in the military. According
    to Dowd, General Petraeus winked and said “There are more than you think”. However, Dowd never heard the conversation and never verified it with the General. This was worse than anything that Jason Blair ever did yet the Times would not discipline Dowd. It only issued a hidden correction. My guess is that Dowd said she would call it sexist if she was disciplined and the Times backed down.

  28. #435538
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:11 am, rambler said:

    Great job, Michelle! May the left get exposed for all that it is. GO SARAH!

  29. #435541
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:13 am, Irish Rose said:

    Great column Michelle, and SPOT ON.

    It deserves a lot of exposure, and it’s going to get it from me.

  30. #435544
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:14 am, tre said:

    They just can’t stand a woman who’ll actually think for herself, instead of doing as she’s told.

  31. #435549
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:18 am, navywife91 said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:03 am, graysonret said:

    I read the “article” which contained the phrase “she courted the group for years” two times. I’ve never been on that website before, but that seemed more like an OpEd than an informational piece. There’s a big difference between listening to a speaker once and being friends with a guy who blows up government buildings and belonged to a group who advocated killing parents.

  32. #435556
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:23 am, Jim M. said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:57 am, Daria said:
    BTW, did anyone see Bob Beckel this morning on FOX? He actually drew a false parallel between that New Yorker cover, which was actually a slam against conservatives and their perceived views of Obama, and US Weekly’s utterly despicable Sarah Palin hit-job. It was Alan Colmes-like in its contortions.

    Bob Beckel? He is nothing more than a political hack who has not an ounce of intellectual honesty.

    Bob Beckel? He’s just glad that he never made the cover. This is the same guy that hired a DC prostitute to come to his home. And he paid her with a check! And then was shocked when the lady in question tried to blackmail him. Beckel went running to the police to cry that he was a victim of extortion. And he filed a formal complaint.

    Bob Beckel. Victim. And complete idiot.

    Pretty shocking that Fox news uses this guy for anything other than cleaning toilets.

  33. #435558
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:23 am, Morganfrost said:

    This is getting to be truly nauseating. I have yet to hear anyone simply express honest disagreement with Palin– folks on the left seem not so much opposed to her policies as offended by her existence. How can you even have a serious debate on the topic?

  34. #435559
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:25 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    When it comes to female abuse, the left are bereft of character and class and all that remains is a big hairy @ss.

    :shock:

  35. #435561
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:25 am, mchristian said:

    In Howard Kurtz’s column today, he wrote about the McCain campaign’s “war against the press.” In it, he quoted Campbell Brown who browbeat Tucker Bounds on Monday on her CNN program. Brown said, “Experience is a legitimate issue when John McCain raises it about Obama, and it’s also legitimate for us to raise it about Palin.” Apparently, it does not occur to Brown or to Kurtz that it was their job to raise the issue about Senator Obama. They seem unable to see the difference between the pass they have given Senator Obama and the scourging they are giving Governor Palin. It is willful blindness.

  36. #435562
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:26 am, St. Louis Blue said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:52 am, Sidana said:

    So the real question IS… what are we going to do?

    Stab our warriors in the back and eat our own?

  37. #435567
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:29 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:23 am, Morganfrost said:

    How can you even have a serious debate on the topic?

    You can’t. The left doesn’t want honest debate. They don’t want anything they believe questioned because they know they’ll lose. So, instead they attack and smear their opponents.

  38. #435568
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:29 am, navywife91 said:

    In it, he quoted Campbell Brown who browbeat Tucker Bounds on Monday on her CNN program. Brown said, “Experience is a legitimate issue when John McCain raises it about Obama, and it’s also legitimate for us to raise it about Palin.”

    I watched this and wanted to jump through the screen. She did this a few days earlier to another McCain spokesman (dark-haired guy, can’t remember his name). The funny thing is that Brown called Tucker “Tucker baby” at the end of the inquisition interview. I wonder what would have happened if their sexes were reversed?

  39. #435571
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:32 am, twiggman said:

    Jim M #32…Where can I read that about Butt head Beckel…

  40. #435572
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:33 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Wow and yes this is powerful. Well done. Well done and a must read–But just a little compassion Michelle? Just a touch, please?

    Maureen Dowdy and Hair by Monsanto Chemical Biden have perfectly good reasons to be upset with a good looking person. Even “docile doormats” have to feel some pity for the Ugly Twins of Leftist Land. Maybe not.
    But let us all give thanks they are not married to each other.

    twiggman asked How do these people look in the mirror?
    Maureen Dowdy and Hair by Monsanto Chemical Biden can’t. Compassion.

    Remeber, Our next Vice President comes from “Alaska – Where Men are Men and Women Win the Iditabroad Idiarod” and I have the t-shirt.
    /compassion: insert bile

    Hey Obama-Want to see Bitter?
    Look at your wife.

    WE SHOULD BE CIVIL-WE CONSERVATIVES?
    Not a chance.

  41. #435575
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:34 am, FamilyMan said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:14 am, tre said:
    They just can’t stand a woman who’ll actually think for herself, instead of doing as she’s told.

    In the Hindu marriage ceremony, the bridegroom will say “I bow to the women in my wife. The bride will say “I bow to the man in my husband”. Strong men and women are not threatened by their spouses but take strength from each other.

  42. #435576
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:35 am, Patchthebun said:

    Thank you for this article, Michelle. One can only hope that people see the left for what they are and put some brain power into their vote this fall.

  43. #435578
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:37 am, fluffy said:

    ArizonaNeanderthal @ 8:33

    Hey Obama-Want to see Bitter?
    Look at your wife.

    That’s gonna leave a mark.

  44. #435580
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:39 am, MikeOK said:

    One of your best yet, Michelle. Fantastic.

  45. #435583
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:42 am, fromnowhere said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:28 am, twiggman said:
    How do these people look in the mirror?

    Actually they have no problem looking into the mirror. They are sort of like the fictional vampire. There is no reflection because there is no substance. Only insatiable self-interest that seeks to destroy in order to have it’s own way and feed off of others.

    On a brighter note, excellent article Michelle. Keep up the good fight.

    Excellent

  46. #435585
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:44 am, Jim M. said:

    The left’s attempt to turn Palin into a modern day Jezzabell is actually transforming her into a modern day Joan of Arc.

    This is what happens when hatred and loathesome intentions cloud one’s judgment. They may not regret it now, but they sure as hell will be crying a river when Obama has to get directions to find his way back to his Senate seat after the election.

  47. #435587
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:47 am, ajmontana said:

    Jim m.
    I agree, and do you think he can get away with just voting “present” over the next four years? lol.

  48. #435589
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:48 am, Jim M. said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:32 am, twiggman said:
    Jim M #32…Where can I read that about Butt head Beckel…

    Enjoy.

    http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/beckel1.html

  49. #435590
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:48 am, St. Louis Blue said:

    Sorry. I’m a bitter clinger and my sarc key stuck.

  50. #435591
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:49 am, srhoades said:

    Wasn’t there a movie made a few years ago about a lib president filling his vacant VP post with a woman? Didn’t that movie portray the Republicans as attacking her based on her looks, fitness as a mother, sexual history, etc.

    Yet another example of liberal projection.

  51. #435593
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:52 am, St. Louis Blue said:

    Then Massihi (who used the names Tiffany and Cindy professionally) and her cohorts allegedly tried to extort $50,000 in hush money from the Democratic heavyweight (literally!) (Beckel)(he ran Walter Mondale’s 1984 presidential campaign).

    You have to sympathize with Beckel. If I had run Mondale’s 1984 campaign, I’d pay to prevent that fact from getting out.

  52. #435594
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:53 am, beenthere said:

    After the 1984 election there was a distinguished conservative pundit (whose name escapes me, unfortunately) who proclaimed that Reagan’s victory was proof the MSM power was overrated and fading. A generation later I am forced to conclude the gentleman was in error.

    One has to stand in awe of media power. In but a few days it can launch an appalling series of coordinated attacks, a media blitzkrieg actually, against Palin or anyone it now perceives as a threat to the One. Given its loathing of the non-left and its adoration of Obama, I wonder if the growing point spread between Obama and McCain is indeed the result of the MSM attacks. If so, this is bad news. It will take a miracle for the Republicans to win.

  53. #435597
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:55 am, sarahconnor41 said:

    What’s most sickening for me is all the women I know who claim they are “liberal” yet happily jump on the bandwagon attacking Palin. When I point out that most of their attacks promote sexism (i.e., “mothers shouldn’t work”), they just respond with a “well she’s pro-life” or “well she’s a Republican” excuse.

  54. #435599
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:56 am, iamsaved said:

    Great article!

    …Echoing the bottom-feeders in the liberal blogosphere, mainstream journalists and Obama water-carriers now question Palin’s commitment to motherhood and even challenged her pre-natal care decisions in an effort to destroy her…

    That statement above highlights the hypocrisy of the left and the fact that their only conviction of the day is what supports their current argument.

    Their mantra for years has been to diss motherhood and stay at home moms who are nothing more than slaves to their husbands and then turn around and criticize Sarah Palin for not “staying home”, raising her kids and baking apple pies but trying to do it all.

    “The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left,” (Ecclesiastes 10:2)

  55. #435604
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:59 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Out of the park! Way to go, Michelle!

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:52 am, Sidana said:

    So the real question IS… what are we going to do?

    Start here.

  56. #435609
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:01 am, navywife91 said:

    Wasn’t there a movie made a few years ago about a lib president filling his vacant VP post with a woman? Didn’t that movie portray the Republicans as attacking her based on her looks, fitness as a mother, sexual history, etc.

    Yet another example of liberal projection.

    “The Contender” is the movie you’re referring to. Great point! Oh, wait. She was a big lib, so it’s just not the same. Better luck next time!

  57. #435613
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:02 am, lgm said:

    Hillary Clinton was described here and other conservative sites in ways that are not “gentlemanly”. If you want civility, start at home.

  58. #435618
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:04 am, misterbee241 said:

    Newspaper cartoonists Ted Rall, Pat Oliphant, and Jeff Danziger caricatured Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice as a mammy, thick-lipped parrot, and Bush “House Nigga” armed with “hair straightener.” New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd derided former GOP Florida secretary of state Katherine Harris for applying “her makeup with a trowel.”

    In my experience when they attack personally the are out of arguments and have lost the debate. They’re just trying to save face.
    There was one member of a forum who viciously attacked Ann Coulter for her physical appearance. I told him to tell me where he differed with her on the issues and where exactly she was wrong. He never responded.
    The left has lost the Palin argument and they know it.

  59. #435620
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:05 am, St. Louis Blue said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:59 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Out of the park! Way to go, Michelle!

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:52 am, Sidana said:

    So the real question IS… what are we going to do?

    Start here.

    Great post 30! I’d only add “…and stop the piteous bleating about Juan McAmnesty.” The primaries were over months ago.

  60. #435624
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:07 am, St. Louis Blue said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:02 am, lgm said:

    Hillary Clinton was described here and other conservative sites in ways that are not “gentlemanly”. If you want civility, start at home.

    When I want civility I through the troll out of my home. I believe it was your King William who described Hillary as “Ol’ Pumpkin Legs.”

  61. #435625
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:07 am, navywife91 said:

    Hillary Clinton was described here and other conservative sites in ways that are not “gentlemanly”. If you want civility, start at home.

    “gentlemanly”????????? I do not condone name-calling, but you can’t seriously think this is anywhere on the same scale as what is happening to Sarah Palin or what Michelle Malkin has been called. As Campbell Brown would say, in her whiney tone, “C’mon you have to be honest with me”.

  62. #435628
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:10 am, navywife91 said:

    Hillary Clinton was described here and other conservative sites in ways that are not “gentlemanly”. If you want civility, start at home.

    Did you bother to click on any of the links above????? How about your guys and Michael Steele and Condoleeza Rice. I guess in your eyes it’s ok to use racial slurs as long as the the intended targets are conservatives.

  63. #435630
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:10 am, fluffy said:

    lgm @ 9:02 whined:

    Notice me, Daddy!

    Oh, look! Here he is, all ready to defend a woman whose most notable accomplishment was marrying someone famous.

    They are so cute when they are petulant.

  64. #435631
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:10 am, englishqueen01 said:

    Forget about questioning their patriotism. I question their sanity.

    Don’t question their sanity. It’s long gone.

    Question their humanity – for clearly, they only consider human those they agree with.

  65. #435635
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:11 am, englishqueen01 said:

    If you want civility, start at home.

    Might I remind you, we conservatives have never pretended to be politically correct or tolerant of what is wrong.

    If the left wants to corner the market on tolerance and compassion, they’d better practice what they preach first.

  66. #435636
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:11 am, BemusedLib said:

    Yeah, yeah, yeah…we can’t stand powerful women – that’s why we almost nominated Hillary and why Nancy Pelosi is the most powerful woman elected official in American history. And, speaking of Hillary and Nan, they’ve been through everything Governor Palin has been through, and more, at the hands of the right wing and their media mouthpieces. If you can’t stand the heat…

    And, speaking of the Obama: his father, his mother, his wife, his wife’s decades old college thesis and his extended family in Africa have all come under intense scrutiny. Despite a brilliant record of achievement, he’s been painted as some kind of underserving affirmative action nbaby. Despite a rough upbrining, he’s called an elitist, as though he’s a fourth-generation millionaire like George Bush or some 7-home-owning Arizona Senator. His 20-year-old chemical habits — which he admitted a decade ago — have been brought up repeatedly. He’s been called a muslim, a terrorist, a Maoist, a communist and a Nazi — often on this blog. His patriotism has been questioned because he didn’t wear appropriate jewelry. He’s been called uppity, a celebrity, a lightweight. His ex-pastor has been used to paint him as some sort of Malcom X mates with Angela Davis — people seriously think that his followers are contemplating armed insurrection.

    Well, it all comes with the territory. If Palin (as with Oboma) didn’t expect this, she’s not smart enough to be Vice President. Who’s treating her like a fragile little girl, now? You. A bit sexist, I’d say.

    The process isn’t necessarily fair or right or gentle or nice, but it’s the same for everyone, on both sides.

    Either Governor Palin is as tough and smart as you say she is, and she can handle it without you playing the gender card, or she’s not and she should bail now.

    Unlike caribou, the media is a carnivorous beast.

  67. #435641
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:14 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:10 am, navywife91 said:

    Hillary Clinton was described here and other conservative sites in ways that are not “gentlemanly”. If you want civility, start at home.

    Did you bother to click on any of the links above????? How about your guys and Michael Steele and Condoleeza Rice. I guess in your eyes it’s ok to use racial slurs as long as the the intended targets are conservatives.

    Let’s not forget yesterday’s DU Palin Nickname contest.

  68. #435643
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:16 am, FamilyMan said:

    Michelle’s four stages of discrediting conservative women reminds me of the first weeks in a military boot camp. You must demonize the opposition in war. A soldier needs to react on impulse when body parts are flying around you. There is no place for this desensitizing in civil discourse. The left and right should be ashamed if they participate in this type of politics.

  69. #435646
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:17 am, sonofdy said:

    And, speaking of Hillary and Nan, they’ve been through everything Governor Palin has been through, and more, at the hands of the right wing and their media mouthpieces. If you can’t stand the heat…

    I call BS. Show us where they have been
    -attacked as covering for thier daughters pregnancy.
    -attacked because thier daughter is pregnant.
    -attacked because she dares have a job and a down syndrome child.
    -attacked because she wore a racy t-shirt in college
    -attacked because she is a hunter.
    -attacked because she is pretty.

    Get going bemusedlib. And remember, these attacks are from the people who got obama nominated.

  70. #435647
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:17 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:11 am, BemusedLib said:

    Despite a brilliant record of achievement

    What record? He has to compare himself to the republican vice presidential candidate because he has nothing against McCain. He’s an empty suit. Quit drinking the Kool Aid.

  71. #435651
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:19 am, fluffy said:

    BemusedLib @ 9:11 opined:

    The process isn’t necessarily fair or right or gentle or nice,

    Correct. A tough road to gain a tough post.

    but it’s the same for everyone, on both sides.

    I see you have been out of the country for several decades. Welcome to America!

    Lunatics are churning up silly rumors about Gov. Palin’s children and the MSM swallows hook, line, & sinker.

    St. Barry demonstrates that he possesses little geographic knowledge of the country he wished to rule, and the MSM couldn’t be bothered.

  72. #435652
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:19 am, sonofdy said:

    Despite a brilliant record of achievement

    Good point. What achievements? Picking his nose consistantly without causing a nose bleed? What?

  73. #435654
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:19 am, englishqueen01 said:

    And, speaking of Hillary and Nan, they’ve been through everything Governor Palin has been through, and more, at the hands of the right wing and their media mouthpieces. If you can’t stand the heat…

    Not really. Hard to levy charges of “sexism” when Clinton and Pelosi do everything in their power to deny all the things that make women…women.

  74. #435655
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:20 am, sonofdy said:

    Even the anchor on MSNBC this morning was shocked at the lies coming out about palin.

  75. #435656
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:20 am, iamsaved said:

    BemusedLib

    Despite a brilliant record of achievement, he’s been painted as some kind of underserving affirmative action nbaby.

    Please list Obama’s accomplishments.

    I did a Google search and it had to be one of the shortest list of hits I’ve ever had with that search engine…

  76. #435657
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:21 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    Great stuff. Too bad you have lived this.

  77. #435658
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:22 am, 29Victor said:

    So if I say that a woman can’t successfully juggle a career and a family I’m a sexist pig, but if a lefty reporter says it they’re a feminist?

  78. #435659
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:22 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    The Democrat[ic Socialist Communist] Party describes themselves as:

    We are the party of the African American, Mexican American, Puerto Rican, all other Latino American, Native American, Asian American, and all racially and nationally oppressed peoples, as well as women, youth, and all other working people.

    Dems want to marginialize Republicans as the party of the “rich white man”.

    That is why a McCain-Romney ticket would have played directly into their mantra, and would have lost to Obama-Biden.

    Their mantra is destroyed by anyone who is both a member of one or more of those groups and a vocal Republican. That is why the Democrat[ic Socialist Communist]s can’t stand people like Michelle Malkin and Sarah Palin.

    People like Michelle and Sarah shine the light of truth on those Dhimicratic Socialist Communist lies.

  79. #435661
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:24 am, fluffy said:

    iamsaved @ 9:20

    Please list Obama’s accomplishments.

    I did a Google search and it had to be one of the shortest list of hits I’ve ever had with that search engine

    Hey, how many times have you voted ‘present’ in the Illinois legislature? I thought so.

  80. #435662
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:24 am, ajmontana said:

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′
    They Fear them

  81. #435664
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:26 am, navywife91 said:

    Nancy Pelosi is the most powerful woman elected official in American history.

    In charge of a Congress with an 11% approval rating. Don’t forget she’s one of those evil rich people.

    And, speaking of the Obama: his father, his mother, his wife, his wife’s decades old college thesis and his extended family in Africa have all come under intense scrutiny

    By who? The only people who are willing to look into these legitimate issues are people in alternative media, not the MSM. Take a look at what’s been going on with Sarah Palin the last few days and I dare you to come up with something as sickening and shameful as the treatment she has had. And guess what? I think she’s going to handle herself with grace, despite all of it.

    His patriotism has been questioned because he didn’t wear appropriate jewelry.

    Not because of not wearing the flag pin, but because of what he said the reason was he didn’t wear it.

    If Palin (as with Oboma) didn’t expect this, she’s not smart enough to be Vice President. Who’s treating her like a fragile little girl, now? You. A bit sexist, I’d say.

    No one here has claimed Sarah Palin is not capable of handling this, in fact, many of us claim the exact opposite. Simply pointing out the hypocrisy and the bias (see US thread as just a small example) doesn’t mean we think she is weak. That’s what you and your ilk believe and you’re going to be proven wrong. I can’t wait.

    A bit sexist, I’d say.

    Kind of like constantly referring to Sarah Palin as an office manager.

  82. #435665
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:27 am, RADRuss said:

    Good one Michelle!

    You go girl! ;-)

  83. #435668
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:27 am, navywife91 said:

    So if I say that a woman can’t successfully juggle a career and a family I’m a sexist pig, but if a lefty reporter says it they’re a feminist?

    Ding, ding, ding! You win the prize!

  84. #435669
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:27 am, St. Louis Blue said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:11 am, BemusedLib said:
    Despite a brilliant record of achievement, he’s been painted as some kind of underserving affirmative action nbaby.

    Just what exactly do you mean by an “nbaby”? Freudian slip much?

    P.S. I throw trolls out of the house. Occasionally I throw them through the house on their way out of the house.

  85. #435671
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:29 am, englishqueen01 said:

    So if I say that a woman can’t successfully juggle a career and a family I’m a sexist pig, but if a lefty reporter says it they’re a feminist?

    Pretty much. In a sane world, that’d be known as a “double standard” – in a liberal’s world, that’s a fair assessment.

    This whole debate can be summed up simply:

    Were Sarah Palin a Democrat, they’d love her. Liberals hate conservative women. Period.

  86. #435673
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:31 am, St. Louis Blue said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:11 am, BemusedLib said:

    And, speaking of the Obama: his father, his mother, his wife, his wife’s decades old college thesis and his extended family in Africa have all come under intense scrutiny.

    Ooooooooooo. Scrutiny! No, intense scrutiny. Now we know Superman’s kryptonite is intense scrutiny. :lol:

  87. #435674
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:31 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    * NO WAY was Joe Biden insulting Sarah Palin by her good looks, he was only making a self-deprecating joke about himself. Stop running with this lie.

    * I like how MM proves that everyone is saying Palin is a neocon puppet by linking to a google search of just palin and neocon. Guess what? She is a neoconservative!

    * Maureen Dowd has excoriated Obama and both Clintons, and Katherine Harris does look ridiculous! (or at least she used to)

    The fact that MM quotes individual internet posters shows that she is really trying hard to link the mainstream left with a few idiots. Someone over at the HuffPo said Nancy Reagan should die? So what, someone here called Spike Lee a ni**er. Doesn’t prove anything about either side. Some lefties came up with some nasty names for Palin? OK, I never heard anything bad about Hillary.

  88. #435676
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:34 am, ajmontana said:

    LMAO!
    Sarah has accomplished more in ONE day than the 2YEARS of campaigning by the Democrats, securing the Base, more Women Voters, NRA, POOF! gone for the Dems and sending the Obamnites into a frenzy of Fear and Squirming.

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′
    Image: dems in fetal position, sucking their thumbs in the corner.

  89. #435679
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:35 am, FamilyMan said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:11 am, BemusedLib said:
    Yeah, yeah, yeah…we can’t stand powerful women – that’s why we almost nominated Hillary and why Nancy Pelosi is the most powerful woman elected official in American history.

    Maybe we should add the words strong women with integrity. That would disqualify most of the women the democrats have pushed forward. Clinton and Pelosi are not the zenith of women of values.

  90. #435683
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:38 am, PKAmmoTroop said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:11 am, BemusedLib said:

    And, speaking of the Obama: his father, his mother, his wife, his wife’s decades old college thesis and his extended family in Africa have all come under intense scrutiny.

    This thread is about the treatment of women. Are you saying that Obama is a woman?

  91. #435684
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:39 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    The fact that MM quotes individual internet posters shows that she is really trying hard to link the mainstream left with a few idiots.

    Go here.

    Someone over at the HuffPo said Nancy Reagan should die? So what, someone here called Spike Lee a ni**er.

    And difference is, that post was probably deleted and the majority here probably denounced it. Unlike, your casual “so what”.

  92. #435685
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:39 am, navywife91 said:

    * NO WAY was Joe Biden insulting Sarah Palin by her good looks, he was only making a self-deprecating joke about himself. Stop running with this lie.

    Kind of like when he referred to Obama as the first clean-cut, articulate…well you know the rest. It’s called condescension. Look it up.

    So what, someone here called Spike Lee a ni**er.

    I must have missed that one, but if it’s true I’m sure that poster is no longer here. If I’m wrong, please provide some proof.

    Maureen Dowd has excoriated Obama and both Clintons, and Katherine Harris does look ridiculous! (or at least she used to)

    This may be true, but you actually think it’s legitimate to attack Palin by making up lies about her baby. Were any of the children of the people you mentioned personally attacked?

    The fact that MM quotes individual internet posters shows that she is really trying hard to link the mainstream left with a few idiots

    Have you been watching the news? Have you noticed that lovely US magazine cover? You truly are in denial about the tactics your side is using. You really should embrace it instead of trying to point the finger at us. There is a double standard and you know it.

  93. #435687
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:41 am, St. Louis Blue said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:38 am, PKAmmoTroop said:

    This thread is about the treatment of women. Are you saying that Obama is a woman?

    Honestly, PK. Do you really expect the trolls to stay on topic? They’re not capable.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sarah Palin: “Going Rogue”

September 28, 2009 05:52 PM by Michelle Malkin

96 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

Soros-tied authors launch bid to dislodge conservative best-selling books

August 31, 2009 03:23 PM by Michelle Malkin

138 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

“…among our prizes is a grand-prize of a trip for two to Honolulu, Hawaii…”

Meet the FCC Diversity Czar

August 7, 2009 01:01 PM by Michelle Malkin

25 Comments | 33 Trackbacks

Letterman’s half-assed apology; Update: Palin accepts

June 15, 2009 11:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

149 Comments | 25 Trackbacks

Bad joke.

David Letterman: Perv

June 12, 2009 04:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

766 Comments | 61 Trackbacks

Why they hate us

June 11, 2009 11:42 AM by Michelle Malkin

195 Comments | 25 Trackbacks


Categories: Kos, Nutroots, Sarah Palin




HotAir GreenRoom