The Four Stages of Conservative Female Abuse

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 3, 2008 07:16 AM

My syndicated column today takes a broader view of those suffering from Palin Derangement Syndrome and assesses the longtime signs and symptoms of progressive Conservative Female Abuse by the Left. Yes, I speak from personal experience. Been there, done that. See also: Unhinged. See-Dubya blogged over the weekend about the Palin-haters’ fake bikini photo mania. Again: Been there, done that. Now, those fake photos of the governor are spreading like kudzu. See here, here, and here. It’s all coming soon to a Democrat rag-masquerading-as-a-tabloid or a Democrat tabloid-masquerading-as-a-manstream newspaper near you.

***

The Four Stages of Conservative Female Abuse
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2008

There’s something about outspoken conservative women that drives the Left mad. It’s a peculiar pathology I’ve reported on for more than 15 years, both as a witness and a target. Thus, the onset of Palin Derangement Syndrome in the media, Democrat circles, and the cesspools of the blogosphere came as no surprise. They just can’t help themselves.

Liberals hold a special animus for constituencies they deem traitors. Minorities who identify as social and economic conservatives have left the plantation and sold out their people. Women who put an “R” by their name have abandoned their ovaries and betrayed their gender. As Republican officeholders and conservative public figures who are women have grown in number and visibility, the progression of Conservative Female Abuse has worsened. The astonishing vitriol and virulent hatred directed at GOP Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is the most severe manifestation to date.

The first stage of Conservative Female Abuse by the Left is infantilization. Right-wing women can’t possibly believe what they believe about the sanctity of life, self-defense, free markets, or foreign policy. They must be submissive little dolls of the White Male Hierarchy. Or, as a far Left (is there any other kind of Left in San Francisco?) San Francisco Chronicle columnist wrote of First Lady Laura Bush, they must be put in their place as “docile doormats” with no brains of their own. True to form, no sooner had John McCain announced Gov. Palin as his veep pick than jeers of “Palin = neocon puppet” sprouted across the Internet.

The second stage of CFA is sexualization. A conservative woman is not merely a sellout. She is an intellectual prostitute. Unable or unwilling to argue with them on the merits, detractors resort to mocking the physical appearance of their ideological opponents in skirts and denigrating them with vulgar epithets. MSNBC hosts insulted former GOP presidential candidate Fred Thompson’s accomplished wife and mother of two, Jeri Thompson, as working the stripper pole. Newspaper cartoonists Ted Rall, Pat Oliphant, and Jeff Danziger caricatured Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice as a mammy, thick-lipped parrot, and Bush “House Nigga” armed with “hair straightener.” New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd derided former GOP Florida secretary of state Katherine Harris for applying “her makeup with a trowel.”

True to form, Dowd was first out of the box to snicker at Gov. Palin’s beauty pageant past, ridicule her “beehive and sexy shoes,” and compare her path to the vice presidential nomination as a “hokey chick flick.” Joe Biden backhandedly praised her as “good looking.” And left-wing bloggers worked overtime on lurid photoshops of Palin as a bikini model and porn star. At the Democratic Underground, a highly trafficked liberal website raising money for Barack Obama, members held a contest to come up with nicknames and posters to slime GOP Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin — and then to “spread [them] all over the ‘net.” Among the “nicer” entries: “Cruella,” “Gidget,” “Governor Jesus Camp,” “VPILF,” “Fertilla the Huntress,” “Iditabroad,” and “KILLER PYSCHO FUNDIE BITCH FROM HELL!!”

The third stage of CFA is demonization. When the Left tires of hurling whore insults, it turns conservative women in the public eye into nefarious creatures. Bill Maher called Laura Bush “Hitler’s dog.” George Carlin attacked Barbara Bush as “the Silver douchebag.” A Huffington Post website member wrote of Nancy Reagan: “Like her evil husband, she has lived far too long. Here’s hoping the hag suffers for several weeks, then croaks in the tub.” Another added: “I feel no pity for the bitch who took delight in watching thousands die of a horrible disease and watching the poor having to eat out of dumpsters because of her husband’s political beliefs.”

True to form, rumors of Palin being a crypto-Nazi surfaced on the Internet and the fringe media. And liberal critics used her gun-rights record to smear her as bloodthirsty.

And the final stage of CFA is dehumanization. Conservative women aren’t real women according to the liberal feminist establishment’s definition. Remember when Gloria Steinem called Texas Republican Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison a “female impersonator?” Or when curdled NOW leader Patricia Ireland instructed Democrats to vote only for “authentic” female political candidates? Or when Al Gore’s fashion consultant Naomi Wolf described the foreign-policy analysis of Jeane Kirkpatrick as being “uninflected by the experiences of the female body?”

Echoing the bottom-feeders in the liberal blogosphere, mainstream journalists and Obama water-carriers now question Palin’s commitment to motherhood and even challenged her pre-natal care decisions in an effort to destroy her. Forget about questioning their patriotism. I question their sanity.

Posted in: Kos, Nutroots, Sarah Palin

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Sarah Palin to Deliver Knock out Punch Tonight: « Riggword Weblog
  2. JammieWearingFool
  3. Snapped Shot
  4. Health Care BS - FEAR OF PALIN & PRESS PSYCHOPATHY
  5. “Conservative Female Abuse” « Gunservatively!
  6. P.D.S. sufferers, there may be help for you, yet. « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
  7. Oinkin’ from the Boinkin’: Sexist Pig Of The Day Award, Sept. 3 « A McCain Democrat’s Journal
  8. The Media are Sexist Bottom Feeders « Musings of Mine
  9. Dewey Napoleon - the only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing » Read this, tell your family and friends, send it to everybody…..expose the tactics of the Left to the light
  10. I have my problems with Michelle Malkin, but dang! « PolitiCatholica
  11. No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » The Morning Scramble - 9/3/2008
  12. No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » The Morning Scramble - 9/3/2008
  13. The Republican Convention « The View from Alexandria
  14. Ditto that | Civil Commotion
  15. BipolarNation.com » Puppets of the Evil White Male Conservative? No.
  16. Stuck On Stupid
  17. Stuck On Stupid
  18. Stuck On Stupid
  19. Feminists Against Palin | novatownhall blog
  20. Welcome To The Liberal Treatment Of Conservative Women » Pirate’s Cove — Barracuda Patrol!
  21. Welcome To The Liberal Treatment Of Conservative Women : Stop The ACLU
  22. Sarah Palin: All Palin All The Time, It’s Her Day, Bitches, Deal With It! « Blog Entry « Dr. Melissa Clouthier
  23. Mike's Noise
  24. Conservative Women - Feminists, No Not That Kind of Feminists « Memoirs From a Young Conservative
  25. What would your mother say? « Belvedere
  26. Bottomfeeders On The Attack «
  27. Sierra Faith
  28. Palin rocks! And, the left panics, P.D.S. rages on, smears continue, etc., etc., etc. « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
  29. Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  30. Oinkin’ From The Boinkin’: Sexist Pig Of The Day Award, September 5 « A McCain Democrat’s Journal
  31. Sexist Pig Of The Day Award . . . REJECTED?!?!? « A McCain Democrat’s Journal
  32. All I share with Gloria Steinem is a chromosome: Thank God! « Retractable Horns & Tail
  33. The process of tearing down conservative women — Cranach: The Blog of Veith
  34. Palin Derangement Syndrome « Grand Rants
  35. Michelle Malkin » Miserable provocateur rails against conservative women again
  36. Caring, compassionate, feminist post-racial Lefty reveals Palin fantasy « The Tizona Group
  37. The difference between a hockey mom and a pitbull is merely lipstick. « .a blog about everything to do with being confused.
  38. Sarah Palin- Fellow Bitch in Arms. « .she’s a bitch.
  39. Playboy: Now With More Misogyny! : Jenn Q. Public
  40. Michelle Malkin » David Letterman: Perv
  41. David Letterman: Perv – Michelle Malkin « Sarah Palin Blog
  42. The NAGs Try to Regain Relevance « AmeriCAN-DO Attitude

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #435688
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:42 am, jangar said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:24 am, ajmontana said:
    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    Yea, but they’re still kicking…now what?

  2. #435692
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:45 am, sonofdy said:

    Obamas record in the senate.

    No votes – 87
    Yes votes – 253
    Didn’t vote – 227

    Thats right, of the 567 votes during his time in the senate Obama didn’t vote on 227 of them. 40% plus of the time. Some record.

  3. #435693
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:45 am, ajmontana said:

    Navy,
    Or they can always go play in their sandbox along with the other kiddies….
    Wheres a can of troll-b-gone when you need it?

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′
    glow removers, 8)

  4. #435698
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:46 am, GladzKravtz said:

    I offer a 5th stage: being frozen out. Speaking your mind (ones involving conservative opinions) will end friendships (ok, maybe they weren’t real friends but I thought they were).

  5. #435699
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:46 am, guitarplayer said:

    Wanna see just how scared Obama really is? He’s about to violate one of the commandments of Liberalism : Thou shalt not appear on Fox News.

    If he’s talking about going on Fox, he must really be desperate.

  6. #435702
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:49 am, navywife91 said:

    great link, 30

    I’m not sure if our little friend can handle the truth. He’s probably working on his response right now. I can’t wait.

  7. #435703
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:51 am, b-cat said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:31 am, Red State Skeptic said:
    She is a neoconservative!

    Wrong. She is a conservative. Stop with the made up words already. They are meaningless. Tired of drivel passed off as debate.

  8. #435707
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:53 am, GladzKravtz said:

    Notice how easy for all forms of media to bring up the gender ’stuff’.
    I wonder what % of people will be voting for McCain/Palin because Palin is a woman v.s. the % of people voting for Obama/Biden because Obama is (part) black.
    I hope Palin’s speech begins to put an end to this mess.

  9. #435709
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:54 am, PKAmmoTroop said:

    Off Topic:

    If running a campaign is considered executive experience for the Dems, why aren’t they running Karl Rove for president?

  10. #435711
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:56 am, Regulus said:

    An excellent column, Michelle. Love the analysis. Just one quibble:

    Forget about questioning their patriotism. I question their sanity.

    Disagree. An insane person by definition has no control over the anti-social behaviors he or she exhibits; that’s why they’re “not guilty” by reason of mental defect.

    The people Michelle describes know exactly what they’re doing. They’re not insane. They’re malevolent. It’s a distinction with an important difference.

  11. #435714
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:56 am, navywife91 said:

    I hope Palin’s speech begins to put an end to this mess.

    I heard a female Dem on F&F say that if Palin’s speech is good, the MSM will leave her along. I’m afraid it’s not going to happen. Please feel free to attack her positions on the issues. The very personal attacks, including those on her daughter,need to stop.

  12. #435713
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:56 am, iamsaved said:

    I found a definition of a liberal Democrat that was foretold 2000 years ago:

    “. . . men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof . . ” (2nd Timothy 3:2-5)

    Actually, it applies to more than just the libs but they do personify it so well.

  13. #435717
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:57 am, b-cat said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:53 am, GladzKravtz said:
    I wonder what % of people will be voting for McCain/Palin because Palin is a woman v.s. the % of people voting for Obama/Biden because Obama is (part) black.

    Identity politics at its best. Wonder who black women are supposed to vote for? Rhetorical question. Everybody is supposed to vote for The Obama.

  14. #435718
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:59 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    b-cat,

    Not me. My sister and my mother, for sure. But not me.

  15. #435719
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:59 am, DaveC said:

    I see a flock of pigeons flew in to poop and leave..

    (lgm, bemused lib, redstate skeptic)

    I think a strong conservative woman SCARES them.. and they can’t stick around to defend their arguments.. or lack there off..

    flak, target.

  16. #435721
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:59 am, PKAmmoTroop said:

    I’m going to have to disagree with you Regulus, I believe Michelle is correct in questioning their sanity.

    Albert Einstein once said “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”.

    The leftists keep doing the same stupid things over and over and over and they wonder why it keeps blowing up in their face.

    And personally I do question their patriotism, especially the moron moveon.org and A.N.S.W.E.R. crowds

  17. #435722
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:59 am, b-cat said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:56 am, iamsaved said:

    A reference to the last days. Ominous, no?

  18. #435725
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:01 am, iamsaved said:

    A reference to the last days. Ominous, no?

    Not if one is prepared…

  19. #435726
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:02 am, b-cat said:

    Never any doubt about ya, 30! ;)

  20. #435727
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:02 am, srhoades said:

    Hillary Clinton was described here and other conservative sites in ways that are not “gentlemanly”.

    There is search button on this site so please provide linked examples.

    And, speaking of Hillary and Nan, they’ve been through everything Governor Palin has been through, and more, at the hands of the right wing and their media mouthpieces.

    Well, if this is the case you will have no trouble proividing us with links of Hillary and Nancy photoshopped into porn.

  21. #435729
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:03 am, navywife91 said:

    The McCain is releasing a memo, a new ad and also having a press conference today addressing some more stupid lies. Someone is actually accusing Sarah of being a “Nazi sympathizer”. I’m pretty sure Megyn Kelly said Leiberman is going to take care of that little story. hey, aj, I know you’re making googly eyes at Megyn right now. :smile:

  22. #435731
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:04 am, navywife91 said:

    Albert Einstein once said “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”.

    That pretty much sums up Mr. Hope and Change’s speech, doesn’t it?

  23. #435733
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:05 am, Jim M. said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:11 am, BemusedLib said:

    Despite a brilliant record of achievement, he’s been painted as some kind of underserving affirmative action nbaby.

    You’re joking, right? Not ONE person has been able to elaborate on just what achievements Obama has to his credit. Not one.

    A brilliant record of achievement? Now THAT’s funny!

  24. #435735
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:06 am, BemusedLib said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:17 am, sonofdy said:
    And, speaking of Hillary and Nan, they’ve been through everything Governor Palin has been through, and more, at the hands of the right wing and their media mouthpieces. If you can’t stand the heat… call BS. Show us where they have been
    -attacked as covering for thier daughters pregnancy.
    -attacked because thier daughter is pregnant.
    -attacked because she dares have a job and a down syndrome child.

    Obviously not. But that’s not what’s under the microscope now. It’s the right wing that’s pushing this spin now in an attempt to deligitimize criticism of her resume, her cronyism, etc.

    -attacked because she wore a racy t-shirt in college

    -
    For wearing pantsuits and Armani

    attacked because she is a hunter.

    Not an issue. Or not sexist, anyway — anti-hunters probably don’t like Cheney either

    -attacked because she is pretty.

    Attacked because they weren’t

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:19 am, sonofdy said:
    Despite a brilliant record of achievement
    Good point. What achievements? Picking his nose consistantly without causing a nose bleed? What?

    I was unclear on this, and I apologize — in the contect of Obama being called an “undeserving affirmative action baby” I was pointing out 1) there is no reason to believe that he was given anything and 2) Whether or not he caught a break he has certainly rewarded those who took a chance on him by becoming President of the Harvard Law Review, a law lecturer (offered tenure) at one of the most prestigious law schools in the country; a state legislator, a U.S. Senator and the Democratic nominee for president — all while black. Not getting into the argument over whether that qualifies him to be president, but if you were an admissions officer — or a parent — and you took a chance on/raised a kid like that, you’d have a right to be pretty damn pleased.

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:26 am, navywife91 said:

    Nancy Pelosi is the most powerful woman elected official in American history.

    In charge of a Congress with an 11% approval rating. Don’t forget she’s one of those evil rich people.

    That will change when we have a filibuster-proof Senate. And I’m down with rich people. As long as they pay taxes at the same rate as the middle class.

    And, speaking of the Obama: his father, his mother, his wife, his wife’s decades old college thesis and his extended family in Africa have all come under intense scrutiny

    By who? The only people who are willing to look into these legitimate issues are people in alternative media, not the MSM. Take a look at what’s been going on with Sarah Palin the last few days and I dare you to come up with something as sickening and shameful as the treatment she has had. And guess what? I think she’s going to handle herself with grace, despite all of it.

    And m ost of the people Michelle linked to are fringe web sites. The MSM is more or less-even-handed, especially once the Murdoch empire weighs in. I’ll bet the Governor gives a fine speech tonight. Lots of red meat working mom and media-bashing.

    His patriotism has been questioned because he didn’t wear appropriate jewelry

    .
    Not because of not wearing the flag pin, but because of what he said the reason was he didn’t wear it.

    And he was right — it’s in your heart, not what’s on your lapel that counts. But that wasn’t enough for the haters.

    If Palin (as with Oboma) didn’t expect this, she’s not smart enough to be Vice President. Who’s treating her like a fragile little girl, now? You. A bit sexist, I’d say.

    No one here has claimed Sarah Palin is not capable of handling this, in fact, many of us claim the exact opposite. Simply pointing out the hypocrisy and the bias (see US thread as just a small example) doesn’t mean we think she is weak. That’s what you and your ilk believe and you’re going to be proven wrong. I can’t wait.

    The bias of a small handful of on-line extremists. M

    A bit sexist, I’d say.

    Kind of like constantly referring to Sarah Palin as an office manager.

    I refer to her as “Governor Palin.” I suggest that the “executive experience” argument made by the McCain campaign (who is writing her speech for her — sexist, much?) is a canard, applicable if one were applying for an office manager position but grotesquley inadequate — on its own — if one wishes to be president or vice president.

  25. #435738
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:07 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Not ONE person has been able to elaborate on just what achievements Obama has to his credit.

    Not even Obama! ;-)

  26. #435739
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:07 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:03 am, navywife91 said:

    The McCain is releasing a memo, a new ad and also having a press conference today addressing some more stupid lies. Someone is actually accusing Sarah of being a “Nazi sympathizer”.

    Nazi sympathizer? So, throwing wild accusations out at the GOP VP pick is ok, but questioning a known relationship between the DNC’s presidential candidate and a domestic terrorist is out of bounds. What is our press coming to? They’re turning into the politburo for the Democratic Party.

  27. #435743
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:08 am, fulldroolcup said:

    BemusedLib vainly attempted to organize his thoughts, then wrote:

    Yeah, yeah, yeah…we can’t stand powerful women

    Not the argument. The argument is that libs and their MSM fellow travellers cannot stand, and try to beat down through vicious mis-characterization, racist attack, and innuendo, any conservative women who holds or seeks high office.

    I know it quickly tires your lips, but try reading the article.

    – that’s why we almost nominated Hillary

    But you didn’t nominate her. “You” nominated the guy. That’s why “they” bleat about the glass ceiling, remember?

    and why Nancy Pelosi is the most powerful woman elected official in American history.

    She is? Can you offer any examples where she has actually exercised that supposed power of hers to achieve anything? What has she DONE with her supposed power?

  28. #435744
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:09 am, GladzKravtz said:

    30 pcs of silver said:

    30 pcs, sure hope you are voting ‘issues over gender’…oops, there I go again, speaking my mind….

  29. #435745
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:09 am, b-cat said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:03 am, navywife91 said:
    Someone is actually accusing Sarah of being a “Nazi sympathizer”.

    Nazi is an abbreviation of an impossibly long German word. It stands for National Socialist German Workers Party. A left wing organization turned into a personal instrument for Hitler. How exactly that becomes property of the right, I don’t know.

  30. #435749
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:12 am, ajmontana said:

    Navy,
    and which hot blooded American male wouldn’t???
    Don’t leave out Martha … 8)

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′
    Image: Dems squirming, making the Big O’ symbol wondering “what the heck is happening!” oh no!!!!!

  31. #435750
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:12 am, Socky said:
    In charge of a Congress with an 11% approval rating. Don’t forget she’s one of those evil rich people.

    That will change when we have a filibuster-proof Senate.

    Yeah, it’ll be 2%

    And I’m down with rich people. As long as they pay taxes at the same rate as the middle class.

    25% it is, then. And not the 40% Obama wants the most productive class in society to pay.

    Why confiscating money from the investor class and giving it in the form of welfare to the smokes-and-lottery-tickets class is supposed to be good for the economy I’ll never understand.

  32. #435751
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:13 am, JohnnyD said:

    Another Great article Michelle. Maybe you can include this one as an addendum in your book “Unhinged II, The Wrath of Liberalism”

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:11 am, BemusedLib said:

    Either Governor Palin is as tough and smart as you say she is, and she can handle it without you playing the gender card, or she’s not and she should bail now.

    So, if she shows she is tough and smart, you’d be inclined to vote for her ticket, right? I mean given what you think about Hillary and San Fran Nan, you will give her a break, correct?
    Somehow, I don’t think you will and only because she has a “R” behind her name.

  33. #435753
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:13 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:39 am, navywife91 said:

    So what, someone here called Spike Lee a ni**er.
    I must have missed that one, but if it’s true I’m sure that poster is no longer here. If I’m wrong, please provide some proof.

    Have no idea whether the poster was booted, but the post is still online! Google it. (Either way, who cares? There are dummies on both sides, and I don’t try to say because you have some uncouth racists you’re also wrong on school vouchers.)

    Maureen Dowd has excoriated Obama and both Clintons, and Katherine Harris does look ridiculous! (or at least she used to)
    This may be true, but you actually think it’s legitimate to attack Palin by making up lies about her baby. Were any of the children of the people you mentioned personally attacked?

    Not by Maureen Dowd (who is a waste of time anyway, but that’s another story)

    You truly are in denial about the tactics your side is using.

    My side is not tabloids! My side is Barack Obama, and he has denounced the Palin innuendos and unequivocally called her family off limits. Don’t try to conflate two or three liberal bloggers (even Markos said he was offended by the posts on his site) with the Democratic party.

  34. #435754
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:13 am, DBNinKY said:

    And the final stage of CFA is dehumanization.

    Democrats could have taught Goebbels a thing or two in dehumanizing the enemy. Look at how they’ve made women and the unborn subhumans.

  35. #435757
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:14 am, Socky said:

    Is “Bemused” a new synonym for “Deranged?”

  36. #435759
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:14 am, PKAmmoTroop said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:06 am, BemusedLib said:

    That will change when we have a filibuster-proof Senate. And I’m down with rich people. As long as they pay taxes at the same rate as the middle class.

    You mean to tell me that the Do-Nothing house of Representatives, the documented worst session of congress in recorded history have been wasting our taxpayers time and money passing meaningless resolutions and ignoring the needs of the American people by failing to bring legislation to a vote and refusing to debate issues of vital national importance because the senate isn’t “filibuster proof”?

    Have another sip of Kool-Aid.

  37. #435760
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:15 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:06 am, BemusedLib said:

    I was unclear on this, and I apologize — in the contect of Obama being called an “undeserving affirmative action baby” I was pointing out 1) there is no reason to believe that he was given anything and 2) Whether or not he caught a break he has certainly rewarded those who took a chance on him by becoming President of the Harvard Law Review, a law lecturer (offered tenure) at one of the most prestigious law schools in the country; a state legislator, a U.S. Senator and the Democratic nominee for president — all while black. Not getting into the argument over whether that qualifies him to be president, but if you were an admissions officer — or a parent — and you took a chance on/raised a kid like that, you’d have a right to be pretty damn pleased.

    They raised a good kid. Good for them. Something that they should be proud of.

    How does this qualify him to be president? That’s the question lots of people here are asking. What has he achieved? Why is comparing himself to the vice presidential candidate?

  38. #435762
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:15 am, GladzKravtz said:

    Hey b-cat, I get what you are saying but it’s more like it’s ‘property’ of the left since they seem to use it whenever they want to,..eh?

  39. #435761
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:15 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    30 pcs, sure hope you are voting ‘issues over gender’…oops, there I go again, speaking my mind….

    Without a doubt.

  40. #435763
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:16 am, GladzKravtz said:

    Without a doubt.

    What a woman!

  41. #435764
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:16 am, sonofdy said:

    Obviously not. But that’s not what’s under the microscope now. It’s the right wing that’s pushing this spin now in an attempt to deligitimize criticism of her resume, her cronyism, etc

    Hear that guys? The daily kos, US magazine, ABC and all the rest are now right wingers spining.

    And you still didn’t list his acheivements execpt running a college law review. So what?

  42. #435768
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:18 am, navywife91 said:

    And m ost of the people Michelle linked to are fringe web sites.

    Did you happen to check out the link that 30 put on her post? Those don’t look like extremist sites to me.

    And he was right — it’s in your heart, not what’s on your lapel that counts. But that wasn’t enough for the haters.

    I guess he doesn’t subscribe to that anymore, considering he now wears a flag pin. Way to stand for your principles.

  43. #435773
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:20 am, Socky said:

    That Canadian Pipeline deal Sarah Palin negotiated will result in more jobs, more economic development, and improve more people’s lives than Obama did in ten years of community organizing or any of his 130 votes “present” in the Illinois senate.

  44. #435774
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:20 am, BemusedLib said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:15 am, guitarplayer said:

    As I said, I’m not getting into that here (for the record: because I think he’s right on the issues, because I think he’s a smart guy and because I think he can lead America in a driection in which I would like to see it go). I just find the affirmative action accusations offensive, and a apt paralell to the attacks on Palin’s experience.

  45. #435776
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:21 am, navywife91 said:

    Nazi sympathizer? So, throwing wild accusations out at the GOP VP pick is ok, but questioning a known relationship between the DNC’s presidential candidate and a domestic terrorist is out of bounds. What is our press coming to? They’re turning into the politburo for the Democratic Party

    Apparently, Palin actually had the nerve to wear a “Pat Buchannan” pin when he campaigned in her town. Oh, the horror!

  46. #435778
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:21 am, Socky said:

    . It’s the right wing that’s pushing this spin now in an attempt to deligitimize criticism of her resume, her cronyism, etc

    I’d say the Left delegitmized itself permanently with the “it’s not her baby” smear last weekend.

  47. #435779
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:22 am, RogerCfromSD said:

    The Left is comprised of misguided, delusional people who are twisted up by their own hate and anger.

    Expressing that much vitriol has got to negatively impact them.

    I pray they ask God for forgiveness and for peace. They need it.

  48. #435781
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:23 am, Mookie said:

    Maureen Dowd has bitter down to a science.

  49. #435782
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:23 am, Socky said:

    BTW, regarding certain Democrats denial that the Kos crowd speaks for their party: one picture is worth a thousand words.

  50. #435785
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:25 am, b-cat said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:18 am, navywife91 said:
    I guess he doesn’t subscribe to that anymore, considering he now wears a flag pin. Way to stand for your principles.

    They don’t have principles. They have positions of the moment. If you stand for something, you may have to defend your ground. Something the left is loathe to do.

  51. #435786
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:26 am, Jim M. said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:20 am, BemusedLib said:
    As I said, I’m not getting into that here…

    You won’t get into Obama’s achievements because you can’t. They do not exist.

  52. #435787
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:26 am, BDU-33 said:

    I question their sanity.
    Michelle Malkin

    It’s 1898, Randolph Hearst is alive, and yellow journalism is flourishing.

    You saw it with Senator Hillary Clinton during the Democrat Primary, and now you’re seeing it with Governor Sarah Palin in the General Election.

    It is apparent by the conduct of the American Media, that it will do everything in its power by any means necessary, to prevent a Woman from being elected to Executive high office in the United States.

    In addition, the American Media has fully utilized its leverage and influence with the objective to elect Senator Barak Obama President of the United States, and is working in concert with the Obama Campaign to affect that goal.

    Any Intelligence Analyst would derive, from the data, the same conclusions.

    Only one question remains:

    Will the American Media elect the President in 2008?

  53. #435788
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:27 am, JohnnyD said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:08 am, fulldroolcup said:
    and why Nancy Pelosi is the most powerful woman elected official in American history.
    She is? Can you offer any examples where she has actually exercised that supposed power of hers to achieve anything? What has she DONE with her supposed power?

    How soon you have forgotten…why she pushed thru a recess resolution, turned off the lights and cameras and went on a book tour. She sure does have power!!
    /Sarc

  54. #435789
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:28 am, sonofdy said:

    BTW 69 years ago today, the nazis invaded poland. The start of the most destructive war in history. This was a direct result of the same policies as Obama supports.

  55. #435790
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:29 am, englishqueen01 said:

    As I said, I’m not getting into that here (for the record: because I think he’s right on the issues, because I think he’s a smart guy and because I think he can lead America in a driection in which I would like to see it go).

    What? Socialism? Appeasement of terrorists? Do tell.

    Obama will destroy America. Sad that you’re so excited about the prospect.

  56. #435791
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:29 am, ajmontana said:

    “Ignore the Angry Left”

    Their heads are exploding!

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′
    Image: lefties having a run on Duct Tape to mend thick skulls. 8)

  57. #435793
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:29 am, JohnnyD said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:06 am, BemusedLib said:
    And I’m down with rich people. As long as they pay taxes at the same rate as the middle class.

    Cool! Then the rich will finally get that Tax Cut the libs say they got in 2003.

  58. #435795
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:31 am, Socky said:

    What? Socialism? Appeasement of terrorists? Do tell.

    You left out infanticide… which seems to be the only issue Obama took a strong stand on (in favor of) while in the Illinois senate.

  59. #435797
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:31 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:20 am, BemusedLib said:

    As I said, I’m not getting into that here (for the record: because I think he’s right on the issues, because I think he’s a smart guy and because I think he can lead America in a driection in which I would like to see it go).

    Which direction is that? Higher taxes, infanticide on demand, submitting to the whims of dictators, Socialism?

    I just find the affirmative action accusations offensive,

    I don’t know the whole story behind that so I’m not going to comment.

    and a apt paralell to the attacks on Palin’s experience.

    We can’t talk about a given candidate’s experience and how it relates to what they could do if elected to highter office?

  60. #435799
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:32 am, DBNinKY said:

    My side is Barack Obama, and he has denounced the Palin innuendos and unequivocally called her family off limits.

    Mere lip-service from the One – a move to retain his halo by keeping his own hands clean from the mudslinging which, according to Dick Morris on last night’s H&C, is emanating from Obama’s minions. The attacks on Sarah Palin are an act of desperation on the part Democrats. They are scared of Palin because she is the phenotype of female they purport to represent but don’t, and are now unsure as to which approach to assume in opposing her candidacy without exposing their hypocracy.

  61. #435800
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:32 am, SuzEQCitizen said:

    OT

    Fox is reporting Governor Palin’s SSN has been stolen.

  62. #435802
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:32 am, guitarplayer said:

    Socky, did you hack my computer? ;-)

  63. #435801
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:32 am, navywife91 said:

    Have no idea whether the poster was booted, but the post is still online! Google it. (Either way, who cares? There are dummies on both sides, and I don’t try to say because you have some uncouth racists you’re also wrong on school vouchers.)

    First of all, I take offense when you say “we” have some uncouth racists. How about your side? When racial slurs are lobbed against MM, do you complain on those websites? You don’t even have to go to Google to find those. MM was nice enough to post links for you. By the way, just because it’s still on Google, doesn’t mean those of us here or MM condone it. You can’t even tell us who said it and whether they are still a poster. As a matter of fact, I think we’ve had two mistriants booted off the last couple days for bad behavior and they’re posts are probably still on Google too.

    M

    y side is not tabloids! My side is Barack Obama, and he has denounced the Palin innuendos and unequivocally called her family off limits. Don’t try to conflate two or three liberal bloggers (even Markos said he was offended by the posts on his site) with the Democratic party.

    I lump you in because all you seem to be doing is making excuses for what’s going on and comparing them, with very weak arguments, as if to say it’s all ok. I’ve heard one or two Dems, Kirsten Powers, for instance, condemn this. She’s disgusted, just as we are. The problem is that the MSM is taking these bloggers seriously and repeating the info as if it were factual and newsworthy. They are not doing their jobs!
    I commended Obama for finally coming out and making a statement regarding her family. Remember, these rumors started sometime Saturday and Obama, I believe, made a statement Monday. That wasn’t quick enough in my opinion.

  64. #435806
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:35 am, Christian Soldier said:

    and the fascist LEFT gave us :

    B. H_U_S_S_E_I_N O. >>>>

  65. #435808
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:36 am, englishqueen01 said:

    My side is Barack Obama, and he has denounced the Palin innuendos and unequivocally called her family off limits. Don’t try to conflate two or three liberal bloggers (even Markos said he was offended by the posts on his site) with the Democratic party.

    Yeah, but Obama will still take donations from those bottom-dwellers and show up at KOS conventions. It was a classy statement, but actions speak louder than words.

    As I said in another post – it’s clear how people like me will be treated if Obama wins. I consider that a violation of the Constitution and Declaration of Independence and will fight the Obama administration with every fiber of my being.

  66. #435810
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:37 am, thewariscoming said:

    I said it once and I’ll say it again. The left is totally PO’d because the Republicans are saying ‘two can play at the identity politics game’ and get a woman in there. The media and the leftists only wanted glorious black man Obama versus those evil nasty white males. Now they have to contend with a woman who may take a lot of votes away from Obama merely because she’s a woman. Because that’s what a large portion of Obama supporters are; identity-politic idiots.

  67. #435814
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:38 am, navywife91 said:

    Fox is reporting Governor Palin’s SSN has been stolen.

    She really needs Lifelock now.

  68. #435816
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:38 am, DBNinKY said:

    Which direction is that? Higher taxes, infanticide on demand, submitting to the whims of dictators, Socialism?

    Exactly right! Anyone who denies this will be the outcome of an B. Hussein Obama presidency either does not know what he stands for, or is in a state of determined ignorance.

  69. #435820
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:39 am, FamilyMan said:

    BemusedLib
    Your thinking and responses are just another example of convoluted dialectic detergency. I won’t even attempt responding, because it’s a wast of time. You will never understand that conservatives admire in Palin her strength of convictions with our values. The political dog and pony shows are designed for the less mentally equipped and not for most of the people on this blog.

  70. #435822
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:40 am, navywife91 said:

    My side is Barack Obama, and he has denounced the Palin innuendos and unequivocally called her family off limits. Don’t try to conflate two or three liberal bloggers (even Markos said he was offended by the posts on his site) with the Democratic party.

    Please see post #139

  71. #435823
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:40 am, Socky said:

    Your thinking and responses are just another example of convoluted dialectic detergency.

    I think Pfizer is working on a medication for that.

  72. #435831
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:42 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    Yeah, but Obama will still take donations from those bottom-dwellers and show up at KOS conventions. It was a classy statement, but actions speak louder than words.

    Y’all please spare me. Rush Limbaugh called Chelsea Clinton the “white house dog,” and John McCain said Clelsea was so ugly because her father was Janet Reno. That’s not a remote connection, that IS the Republican Party.

  73. #435833
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:43 am, b-cat said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:32 am, SuzEQCitizen said:
    OT

    Fox is reporting Governor Palin’s SSN has been stolen.

    For a minute there, I thought she had a nuclear submarine. Sucks to have that stolen! :)

  74. #435837
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:43 am, Socky said:
  75. #435857
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:49 am, 2manybooks2littletime said:

    The Left doesn’t really care about these issues, their hope is that they can undermine the person with the Conservative base. . .

    What they don’t understand is that most of the conservative base is not freaking out that Palin’s daughter is pregnant. Most of us understand that you can raise your kids to the best of your ability, you can teach them abstinence, but guess what? The kids have free will and make their own choices. I don’t see Bristol’s pregnancy as proof that abstinence ed doesn’t work. I don’t automatically assume that birth control was not used. The left’s argument is “see, here daughter didn’t use birth control because of abstinence ed and now look!!”

    Well, my husband and his brother and sister were taught abstinence by their parents. My sister-in-law was pregnant and unmarried when she was 19. She DID use birth control. It failed. It happens. Life happens. My brother-in-law and my husband were both virgins on their wedding days. So, 2/3 success rate. Not bad.

    Talk kids in any high school. Find out how many have been pregnant and/or have STD’s after their birth control ed. The odds are the percentage will be pretty high.

    The left’s argument is weak, in my opinion.

  76. #435860
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:49 am, jangar said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:20 am, BemusedLib said:

    because I think he can lead America in a driection in which I would like to see it go).

    Like, the toilet?

  77. #435864
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:50 am, 2manybooks2littletime said:

    I meant to add to the end of the above post~Education is education~the success rate of such ed. is dependent on what the students do with it. The educator (or the parent) doesn’t really have control over what the student (or child) does with it after the fact.

  78. #435867
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:50 am, BemusedLib said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:39 am, FamilyMan said:
    BemusedLib
    Your thinking and responses are just another example of convoluted dialectic detergency. I won’t even attempt responding, because it’s a wast of time. You will never understand that conservatives admire in Palin her strength of convictions with our values.

    I do understand that. That’s why I find the experience argument (and the huntress — I don’t like the name-calling, but I have to admit that Caribou Barbie was pretty funny — and the “small town girl” etc arguments) specious. It’s abouyt her values and policies, which you like and I don’t.

    But, morte importantly, what the heck is “convoluted dialectic detergency?” Is that how Hegel did his dishes, or Plato washed his toga?

  79. #435869
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:51 am, vickisoup said:

    This piece is another homerun, Michelle. My heart is broken by the depravity of these people and their bloodthirsty efforts.
    If poor Bristol and Levi are going to be hounded by paparazzi nonstop for the next four months, I have real fear that the quest to disrupt the GOP ticket and get Sarah to drop out may just work.
    :(

  80. #435873
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:52 am, lgm said:

    englishqueen01 said:

    we conservatives have never pretended to be politically correct or tolerant of what is wrong.

    Translation: I can be an nasty as I want, but reserve to whine if someone is nasty to me.

    Here’s one bitchin’ example of Republican civility.

  81. #435879
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:54 am, Trollman said:

    iamsaved said:

    I found a definition of a liberal Democrat that was foretold 2000 years ago:

    “. . . men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof . . ” (2nd Timothy 3:2-5)

    It goes back even further than that. Isaiah was written about 2700 years ago.

    Isaiah (5:20-21) said:

    Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
    Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness;
    Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!
    Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes and clever in their own sight!

    What is more just than defending a woman’s right to kill her child, even if you have to dump them in the soiled linens until they die like they were supposed to?

    2750 years ago, Amos records God’s judgment on a nation who in their great wickedness and greed, didn’t even spare children in the womb:

    Amos (1:13) said:

    Thus says the LORD,
    “For three transgressions of the sons of Ammon and for four
    I will not revote its punishment
    Because they ripped open the pregnant women of Gilead
    In order to enlarge their borders.”

    As Jeremiah Wright would say:

    That’s in the Bible!

  82. #435883
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:54 am, navywife91 said:

    Y’all please spare me. Rush Limbaugh called Chelsea Clinton the “white house dog,” and John McCain said Clelsea was so ugly because her father was Janet Reno. That’s not a remote connection, that IS the Republican Party.

    I guess you forgot the part where SNL made fun of her looks too? Not exactly a bastion of Conservative Repub. over there. Rush apologized directly to Hillary, even though he says it really was a misunderstanding. As usual, you cannot denounce what is being done to Palin and her daughter can you? How in the world does superimposing her into Porn pics, referring to her body parts in an insulting sexual way, or accusing her of pretending to have her daughter’s baby even compare to being called a dog or ugly. Seriously.

    Wasn’t aware of the McCain statement, so where’s the link?

  83. #435887
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:55 am, sambo said:

    Lets not forget about when they made fun of Rices boots and brought up that she looked like a dominatrix.

  84. #435889
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:55 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    RedStateSkeptic, How is this for a “remote” connection between BO and Kos.

    Barack Obama spoke at a debate hosted by a website where one blogger made accusations about Bristol Palin (but where the man behind the blog condemned the accusations).

    John McCain, the Republican nominee for President of the United States, said Chelsea Clinton was so ugly because Janet Reno was her father.

  85. #435891
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:55 am, Jim M. said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:38 am, navywife91 said:

    Fox is reporting Governor Palin’s SSN has been stolen.

    She really needs Lifelock now.

    This is the same thing they did to Michael Steele.

    It is patently obvious that this is a concerted effort by the liberal left to get Palin to quit. Interesting that the MSM is out there asking the Campaign when she is going to drop out. Since this information isn’t coming from the right, it is a pretty safe bet it is part of the left’s campaign.

    As far as Obama’s lofty admonition to “back off”, it is apparent that these are “just words”. I fail to see how anyone exercising even a modicum of logic and reason can fail to reach the conclusion that this smear campaign is comming from within Obama’s camp. The attacks are SO partisan, SO outrageous, SO biased and SO coodinated, there can be no other conclusion. Obama is the only one that benefits from this.

    And for those unaware of Obama’s prior campaigns, this is precisely the same tactic that knocked out his Senate competition. He claimed he had nothing to do with Ryan’s sealed divorce records being opened, nor anything to do with the records of another one of his rivals seeing the light of day during a heated campaign. You may dismiss this happening once as coincidence, but unfortunately for Obama, it is a pattern that has persisted over and over again in his run for political office.

    Dirty tricks for a dirty politician. Interesting that he can’t seem to win much of anything without a well coordinated smear campaign. Speaks volumes about the substance of the man behind that carefully managed facade.

  86. #435893
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:56 am, jangar said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:54 am, Trollman said:
    iamsaved said:

    Spot on…Amen!

  87. #435894
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:56 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:50 am, BemusedLib said:

    I do understand that. That’s why I find the experience argument…specious.

    This is what I find ironic. Up until now, the left was trumpeting Obama’s experience as a state senator, a community organizer, US senator, and a candidate. Now that Palin is on the scene, all of a sudden, experience is no longer an issue. Riiiiight.

  88. #435895
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:57 am, navywife91 said:

    John McCain, the Republican nominee for President of the United States, said Chelsea Clinton was so ugly because Janet Reno was her father.

    When? Where?

  89. #435901
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:59 am, navywife91 said:

    Barack Obama spoke at a debate hosted by a website where one blogger made accusations about Bristol Palin (but where the man behind the blog condemned the accusations).

    After, pictures came out to prove him otherwise. How long did that take. How many days did Mr. Kos allow them to spout off this crap? Wait they’re still doing it! He’s created a monster and it serves him right. I hope it’s his undoing.

  90. #435911
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:02 am, navywife91 said:

    I just have one more question for you two lib trolls:

    Do you agree with the tactics being used against Sarah Palin? Do you think the MSM would be asking any man running for VP if his children are going to suffer because he’ll be so busy. Then does that make him a bad father? Should her daughter be a part of this campaign?

  91. #435913
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:02 am, Socky said:

    Redstate, that picture was taken after the owner of DailyKos responded to the deaths of four Americans in Iraq with the words “Screw ‘em!”

    About which the candidate has said nothing but “Thank you for your support.”

  92. #435915
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:03 am, wighttrasch said:

    Great column, Michelle. I agree–now it’s a matter of sanity!

    Some talking-head biznatch on CBS wouldn’t even let Rudy Guiliani speak this morning on TV–she asked him a question regarding Palin, then wouldn’t let him answer completely. Filth.

    I hope Palin BRINGS IT tonight.

  93. #435917
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:03 am, FamilyMan said:

    BemusedLib
    Look it up!

  94. #435922
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:05 am, sambo said:

    Jim M. said:
    Speaks volumes about the lack of substance of the man behind that carefully managed facade.

    there you go Jimbo

  95. #435925
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:05 am, Jaded said:

    I question their sanity too and in a REAL conservative world we would have more insane asylums for these frothing at the mouth DOGS.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sarah Palin: “Going Rogue”

September 28, 2009 05:52 PM by Michelle Malkin

96 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

Soros-tied authors launch bid to dislodge conservative best-selling books

August 31, 2009 03:23 PM by Michelle Malkin

138 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

“…among our prizes is a grand-prize of a trip for two to Honolulu, Hawaii…”

Meet the FCC Diversity Czar

August 7, 2009 01:01 PM by Michelle Malkin

25 Comments | 33 Trackbacks

Letterman’s half-assed apology; Update: Palin accepts

June 15, 2009 11:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

149 Comments | 25 Trackbacks

Bad joke.

David Letterman: Perv

June 12, 2009 04:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

766 Comments | 61 Trackbacks

Why they hate us

June 11, 2009 11:42 AM by Michelle Malkin

195 Comments | 25 Trackbacks


Categories: Kos, Nutroots, Sarah Palin



The Other McCain

» Paralysis by analysis

Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

HotAir GreenRoom