See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. The Other McCain: Tale of three covers
2. ScoopThis.Org » The Us Weekly cover you did not see.
3. “US Weekly” Owner Donated Money to Obama: Smears Palin « Sooshi Soo
4. American Power
5. The true 'Vagina Monologues'
6. A Blog For All
7. Mike's Noise
8. Leaning Straight Up
9. Palin rocks! And, the left panics, P.D.S. rages on, smears continue, etc., etc., etc. « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
10. Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
11. Friedman Libertarian - Michelle Malkin & The Us Weekly cover you didn&8217;t see
12. Michelle Malkin » Us Weekly now offering “five FREE issues” to outraged readers
13. Michelle Malkin » Us Weekly now offering “five FREE issues” to outraged readers

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

101. #101
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:13 pm, BemusedLib said:

     On September 3rd, 2008 at 3:58 pm, FamilyMan said:
     BemusedLib I’m sure you’ll cheer yourself hoarse. Have fun.
     My wife and will. We’ve got some really fine cognac ready for the show.

     I actually had a decent wine and arugula for Obama’s, though I swear the arugula was a coincidence!

102. #102
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:13 pm, CyberCipher said:

     What does the collie have to say about this?

     My collie says:

     Michelle Malkin is way ahead of me. I’m still trying to figure out why Amanda Marcotte told us that it was “none of our business” on the day that the Edwards story broke with the MSM — but when the Bristol Palin story broke Monday, Amanda (and her web-site) were all over it like stink on a shiite.

     Don’t interrupt her (Michelle). She’s on a roll.

103. #103
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:13 pm, allrsn said:

     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:11 pm, Waldek1 said:

     LOL great point!

104. #104
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:15 pm, MrVIBEMAN said:

     Every leftist state gets rid of a free press - but yet the free press continues to support/idolize leftist states.

     Yeah, but each leftist state has one news-rag left to spout the approved line.
     Maybe each and every MSM outlet thinks it will be the next version of Al Jazeera in the Middle East, KCNA in North Korea, or TVES in Chavez-land.

105. #105
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:16 pm, BemusedLib said:

     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:03 pm, sambo said:
     BemusedLib said:

     I’ll be watching. I’m expecting a fine speech, though nothing spectacular. I’m sure you’ll cheer yourself hoarse. Have fun. Too bad the convention peaks a day early.

     Agree’d. in that way it will be like the DNC’s. Except for the screaching halt part!

     Heh. As much as you want to believe otherwise, the Obama speech was, if not a home run, at least a triple down the line.

106. #106
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:20 pm, navywife91 said:

     The Enquirer stuff makes for an awkward situation, doesn’t it? A few weeks ago, we were all praising them for their reporting on Edwards and breaking the story. Maybe it’s a blind squirrel thing.

     Let’s see what it’s all about first. My praise for the NE was basically that they were doing the job of the MSM, who ignored the story. Right now, the MSM is doing a bang-up job on Sarah, so I’m not quite sure what else new is out there.

107. #107
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:21 pm, navywife91 said:

     My collie says:

     I hope the collie is live blogging Sarah’s speech tonight. We need his/her help with the troll patrol.

108. #108
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:21 pm, Hannibal said:

     On September 3rd, 2008 at 3:06 pm, Rusty said:

     John Edwards was out of the news when his scandal happened. Sarah Palin was introduced to a national audience when it was announced her daughter was preggers.

     “her daughter was preggers”???
     For goodness sake Rusty, you are the “Church Lady” of the liberal left.

109. #109
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:28 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

     I hope the collie is live blogging Sarah’s speech tonight. We need his/her help with the troll patrol.

     The trolls will probably be speechless.

110. #110
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:29 pm, allrsn said:

     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:16 pm, BemusedLib said:

     Personaly I did not think he made a great speech. The “we are caretakers of our brothers and sisters” thing was really stupid.

111. #111
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:30 pm, CyberCipher said:

     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:21 pm, navywife91 said:
     I hope the collie is live blogging Sarah’s speech tonight. We need his/her help with the troll patrol.

     My collie says:

     Leave lgm to me. He must face…the canine death maul.

112. #112
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:31 pm, Dan Lee said:

     When the movie “Juno” came out the Us Magazine & the liberal media gave this “heartfelt” movie about an unwed teenager shining reviews! 4 Stars from Us Magazine in fact!

     Here’s what the US review said about Juno in their review:

     Newcomer Ellen Page plants herself at center stage and never lets go as Juno, a quirky teen who beds best buddy Bleeker (Michael Cera), gets knocked up and plans to give the baby to a childless couple (Jennifer Garner and Jason Bateman). Charming and funny, the dramedy’s filled with offbeat situations — such as showing Juno in an abortion clinic where a classmate is protesting, or fessing up to her sympathetic father and stepmother. It’s a sleeper that could be this year’s Little Miss Sunshine.

     Yes, charming, unless you’re a Republican/Conservative who actually KEEPS your baby..

     Then it’s a “Scandal”.

113. #113
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:33 pm, Waldek1 said:

     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:29 pm, allrsn said:
     Personaly I did not think he made a great speech. The “we are caretakers of our brothers and sisters” thing was really stupid.

     Especially when someone does not take care of their brother…

114. #114
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:37 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

     Especially when someone does not take care of their brother…

     Oh you mean like this?

     Especially when his brother is in the US making $4 million in income and his brother lives on less $1 a month?

115. #115
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:39 pm, AlohaGuy said:

     I actually had a decent wine and arugula for Obama’s, though I swear the arugula was a coincidence!

     I hope you had some $100 ham too, because if Obama is elected, you may not have enough after-tax dollars to buy any.

116. #116
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:41 pm, AlohaGuy said:

     Especially when his brother is in the US making $4 million in income and his brother lives on less $1 a month?

     To be fair to Obama he believes the government should be responsible for the poor, so as a private citizen, he’s consistent with his beliefs.

117. #117
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:42 pm, sambo said:

     navywife91 said:
     Obama came out today and said he had more executive experience than Palin because he runs his household. He knows about crafting a budget b/c he is responsible for paying the kids’ allowences.

     Please don’t come out and try to use the basketball analogy next Obama.

118. #118
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:43 pm, sambo said:

     AlohaGuy said:
     To be fair to Obama he believes the government should be responsible for the poor, so as a private citizen, he’s consistent with his beliefs.

     ding ding ding. hit the bell, win a prize.

119. #119
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:44 pm, Dan Lee said:

     Here’s a link to the hypocrisy of Us Magazine btw…

     http://www.usmagazine.com/node/13752

120. #120
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:44 pm, FamilyMan said:

     BemusedLib I actually had a decent wine and arugula for Obama’s, though I swear the arugula was a coincidence!

     Arugula is really good mixed with a little beacon. (pork) Good selection.

121. #121
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:47 pm, allrsn said:

     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:39 pm, AlohaGuy said:
     I hope you had some $100 ham too, because if Obama is elected, you may not have enough after-tax dollars to buy any.

     When all the plants are up and running, ethonal will take care of that.

122. #122
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:49 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

     Absoutely AWESOME!!!

     The two real covers Michelle posted previously were enough to make the MSM bias perfectly clear, but that photoshop is the perfect counterpunch!

     Schadenfreudelicious!

123. #123
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:53 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

     Watch the “Plane Truths” video that Rielle Hunter did.

     It is absolutely ironic and flabbergastingly audacious what John Edwards said in that video (while he was having an affair with the camerawoman!)

     Also note the lyrics to the song playing in the background…my, my, my!

124. #124
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:54 pm, travlinman said:

     On September 3rd, 2008 at 3:28 pm, hawkeye54 said:
     Shortly after the end of this clip, Olbermann’s head exploded. Fortunately for the cleaning crew, his head was empty, so clean-up was no biggie.

     Unfortunately, the rest of him is full of bull$h*t and endangers all who come into contact with him.
     I never liked the guy when he was on ESPN, and do not like him at all now. Normally, I am not given to thoughts of unprovoked violence. But if I were ever to meet Olberman, I think that I would like to bust his nose for him. Just to erase that smarmy little smirk off of his face. It gives me great pleasure to know that I am man enough do it and there’s not a thing that he could do to stop me. Cause he’s a sissy-boy. But, that would only make him a martyr for the loonies on the left. Let’s give him and the rest of the libbies a good whuppin’ come election day. That will leave deeper scars on their physce than a bloody nose!

125. #125
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:54 pm, Micheleeroo said:

     Too. True. This. Magazine cover.

126. #126
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:56 pm, BemusedLib said:

     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:39 pm, AlohaGuy said:

     I actually had a decent wine and arugula for Obama’s, though I swear the arugula was a coincidence!

     I hope you had some $100 ham too, because if Obama is elected, you may not have enough after-tax dollars to buy any.

     Since I’m, sadly, not pulling down a quarter of a million dollars a year, my tax bill should stay about the same.

     $100 ham — you mean this stuff? http://www.gourmetfoodstore.com/specialtymeat/specialty-meat-details-7497.asp?mscssid=2S744FM6S9M59P6LVRPU76T757KSBXN9 I tell you, with what Bush has done to the dollar, we yuppies can hardly afford our imported luxury foodstuffs any more.

     On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:44 pm, FamilyMan said:
     BemusedLib I actually had a decent wine and arugula for Obama’s, though I swear the arugula was a coincidence!

     Arugula is really good mixed with a little beacon. (pork) Good selection

     I was going to serve pork, but Governor Palin’s earmark specialists were all booked up. Had to settle for beef and potatoes.

127. #127
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:00 pm, BrianNY said:

     #112 dan lee said:

     When the movie “Juno” came out the Us Magazine & the liberal media gave this “heartfelt” movie about an unwed teenager shining reviews! 4 Stars from Us Magazine in fact!

     That’s pretty funny. It’s not lost on me that Governor Palin’s selection and possible opportunity mirrors the spirit of movies that liberals love to break out three hankies for:

     Mr. Smith Goes to Washington

     Dave

     Man of the Year

     The American President

     The only problem is that Governor Palin is not a liberal.

128. #128
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:04 pm, emjem24 said:

     Yes, Johnny Boy, it really is hard keeping those two families, like those two Americas, “straight.”

129. #129
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:08 pm, Waldek1 said:

     To be fair to Obama he believes the government should be responsible for the poor, so as a private citizen, he’s consistent with his beliefs.

     Are we sure Obama is not trying to sneak him across the Mexican border?

130. #130
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:12 pm, sambo said:

     Waldek1 said:
     Are we sure Obama is not trying to sneak him across the Mexican border?

     I don’t think he needs too. He has an Illinois drivers license.

131. #131
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:15 pm, Waldek1 said:

     LOL…

132. #132
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:17 pm, hawkeye54 said:

     Let’s give him and the rest of the libbies a good whuppin’ come election day. That will leave deeper scars on their physce than a bloody nose!

     Yup. But if you think PDS is bad now - watch it go into hyper drive after she’s sworn in. By comparison, Dan Quayle and Dick Chaney were treated with more dignity and respect than Sarah Palin will ever get from the MSM .

     If Obamessiah is the second coming of Christ, Palin is Judas to the MSM and Lefty Feminists.

133. #133
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:19 pm, atheling said:

     All the more reason to win this election.

     I want to make history. Not just the history that Sarah Palin would make by being elected first woman VP. I mean the history that the American people won over the evil, lying, and vicious machinations of the media.

     That’s the history I want to make!

134. #134
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:28 pm, BruceB said:

     I thought about becoming a liberal, but when I found out they sucked your brains out and then filled your head with Sh#t.

     I said no way

135. #135
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:43 pm, Waldek1 said:

     On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:28 pm, BruceB said:
     I thought about becoming a liberal, but when I found out they sucked your brains out and then filled your head with Sh#t.

     I said no way

     Well, I don’t know about the sh#t part… but, they (liberals) will suck your brains out. Right before they pull you out…

136. #136
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:55 pm, John Ansell said:

     I think they need to put a picture of Clinton over the picture at the bottom left corner that talks about the sex addicts double life. Just saying….

137. #137
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 6:03 pm, pamscasa said:

     nina.levine@usmagazine.com
     entertainment dir. of us weekly NY office to make comments

138. #138
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 6:11 pm, tarpon said:

     The missed story … Fits perfectly.

139. #139
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 6:28 pm, fulldroolcup said:

     Rusty said:

     If Palin wasn’t selected when this news broke, no one would care. But she was put in the spotlight and that spotlight is going to last for a while.

     so you agree that Obama’s wife and kids are fair game. right? RIGHT? Because just a couple months ago Obama said to lay off his wife. But he and she are in the spotlight, right?

     Rusty’s explanation explains nothing, in that it’s an empty syllogism:

     Palin’s in the spotlight

     Being in the spotlight means the press puts a lot of attention on you [itself a tautology]

     THEREFORE whatever topic the press decides to focus its spotlight on, it should be expected.

     BZZZTTTT!!!!

140. #140
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 6:31 pm, navywife91 said:

     nina.levine@usmagazine.com
     entertainment dir. of us weekly NY office to make comments

     Thanks. I sent another letter, but this time mentioned the Fox interview. I suggested they watch, but who knows if they’ll even read it.

141. #141
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 6:36 pm, fulldroolcup said:

     Rusty said:

     John Edwards was out of the news when his scandal happened

     that’s not remotely correct. He was going to speak at Barack’s coronation
     nomination.

     He was being talked about (by Barack’s people) as a candidate for AG in Barack’s administration.

     Pelosi was pushing Edwards as VP.

     the LA Times ALONE has more than 20 articles involving Edwards in June 2008.

     That’s hardly being “out of the news”.

     face it, Rusty: you’re carrying around a suitcase full of helium.

142. #142
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:01 pm, Dan Lee said:

     John Edwards ended up OUT of the news because the liberal media wanted him out, ONCE they knew they could no longer suppress his story..

     Another difference is that he lied & cheated regarding his mistakes..

     At no time has Bristol or her Mother Sarah tried to hide the truth about the pregnancy.

     If the media were at all trying to be objective, they would have used a backhoe in the Edwards story, instead of a dump truck full of smelly “back fill”.

143. #143
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:46 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

     LGM

     Edwards is not running for anything. His affair was exposed by the press.

     LGM, in case you haven’t noticed, Mrs. Malkin is PART of the press.

     As I recall, you were skeptical about it because it was the National Enquirer.

     Seems like they got this one right.

144. #144
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:55 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

     BemusedLIB

     Not that US is a newsmagazine, or could even really be considered part of the MSM. They’re just good capitalists, trying to turn a buck.

     Really? Even here? Or just when they bash republicans?

     If they are such great capitalists, why don’t we issue out a windfall profits tax on them and give the money to the poor. Isn’t that the liberal way, or is this blog slowly but surely converting you to conservatism?

145. #145
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:08 pm, OneMonkeysUncle said:

     Hey, Michelle, HYPOCRITE, much?!

     Yeesh.

146. #146
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:18 pm, docflash said:

     Trollman,classic,I prefer Charmin myself.

147. #147
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:34 pm, Republicanvet said:

     On September 3rd, 2008 at 3:06 pm, Rusty said:

     John Edwards was out of the news when his scandal happened. Sarah Palin was introduced to a national audience when it was announced her daughter was preggers.

     Magazines are used to make money. John Edwards won’t move copy months after he dropped out of the race. Sarah Palin, currently on the minds of the entire country, will.

     What a lame excuse. So magazines want to make money so they slam Palin, yet the Enquirer must not want to make money so they print old news?

     We see how bad it has been just in the past few days. Imagine how bad this would be with the unFairness Doctrine in place to protect the left.

148. #148
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:26 pm, warden said:

     On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:08 pm, OneMonkeysUncle said:

     Hey, Michelle, HYPOCRITE, much?!

     Yeesh.

     OMU,
     Your point is not clear to me. “Hypocrite” is not a verb. Could you please explain further using a “subject - verb - object” format?

149. #149
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:35 pm, fulldroolcup said:

     Yeesh.

     Yeesh!!??? Yeesh me no yeeshes.

     (with a tip o’ the hat to W. Shakespeare)

150. #150
     On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:43 pm, OneMonkeysUncle said:

     It wasn’t meant for the likes of you, warden. It was meant for La Malkin, who got her knockers in high dudgeon over another site mocking a political figure, and who I’m sure knows full well what I meant by “Hypocrite.” Magazines exist to sell print copies; websites, like this one, exist to drive page views. I’m sure La Malkin has a nice pair of Pot Shoes to go with that lovely Kettle Pocketbook she’s waving around…

151. #151
     On September 4th, 2008 at 1:43 am, Jet Jaguar said:

     On September 3rd, 2008 at 3:33 pm, lgm said:

     Edwards is not running for anything. His affair was exposed by the press.

     same is true for Bill Clinton

152. #152
     On September 4th, 2008 at 3:23 pm, cheapseat said:

     WOW ONE MONKEY’S UNCLE, WHEN THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER REPORTED THE EDWARDS BABY, HE WAS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT. HE LIED TO THE MSM AND OF COURSE THEY DIDN’T INVESTIGATE FURTHER (ALA I DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH THAT WOMAN) SOLELY BECAUSE THEY WERE BOTH DEMOCRATS. SEVEN MONTHS LATER THEY STILL WEREN’T INVESTIGATING, BUT WITHIN SEVEN DAYS MRS PALIN AND HER CHILDREN AND HER HUSBAND AND HER NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR HAVE ALL HAD MEDIA PROCTOLOGICAL EXAMS. TODAY MRS PALIN HAS A SEVENTEEN YEAR OLD DAUGHTER WHO ISN’T MARRIED AND IS PREGNANT. OBAMA’S OWN MOTHER WAS SEVENTEEN, PREGNANT, AND UNMARRIED UNLESS OBAMA WAS BORN 3 - 4 MONTHS EARLY. HIS MOTHER WAS DIVORCED AND REMARRIED TO SOMEONE ELSE WHEN HE WAS 6. SO MRS PALIN, YOUR DAUGHTER’S CHILD COULD GROW UP TO BECOME A PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE, AS I’M SURE HIS/HER GRANDMOTHER WILL BE.

153. #153
     On September 4th, 2008 at 6:31 pm, Helene said:

     This magazine showed up at my house weeks ago (uninvited). I plan to take out the nifty little sign me up card and send it in with the Obama Campaign address.

     These silly little cards fall out of the magazine, so you can simply go to the library, pick up a magazine, shake it, and mail in the cards. No problem.

     If we all do this, then the magazine will get to pay all of the postage and the Obama campaign gets the magazine sent to them. Win Win situation.

Comment pages: « 1 [2]