Two covers, one conclusion

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 3, 2008 01:27 AM

Reader James D. writes: “I’m a communication professor, and I’m posting this image outside my office tomorrow morning.” Wish we had more professors like you, James!

Posted in: Media Bias, Sarah Palin

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. The Palinsanity Keeps Rolling Along | The Sundries Shack
  2. Sarah Palin as John McCain’s Running Mate: The Perfect Pick « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  3. New York Times corrects one lie, ABC gloats over trash « Not Your Sweetie
  4. P.D.S. sufferers, there may be help for you, yet. « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
  5. Compare, Contrast « Expat Texan
  6. Mike's Noise
  7. “What Liberal Media?” A Tale of Two “US” Covers « The Sisyphus Files
  8. Moonbattery
  9. The Stout Republican » Blog Archive » What Bias?
  10. Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  11. A Writer Within » The RNC
  12. small dead animals
  13. Small dead animals | Constant Conservative

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #435318
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:32 am, love2rumba said:

    Just posted my critcism to US magazine a few minutes ago…keep fighting…never let them get away anything

  2. #435319
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:34 am, emjem24 said:

    What an awesome idea, James! Perhaps, convince a few students that bias does exist in the media and how to recognize it.

    However, I don’t need to write that much verbage on the two covers. I’ll just sum it up like this:

    H. Y. P. O. C. R. I. S. Y.

  3. #435321
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:36 am, FIslam said:

    What does it say about Palin that she would grant US an interview?

  4. #435322
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:39 am, Michelle Malkin said:

    Perhaps you didn’t read the Us promo of its cover article, which is a string of quotes from Palin-bashers, not an interview with Palin.

  5. #435323
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:39 am, alaskangrizzly said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:36 am, FIslam said:

    What does it say about Palin that she would grant US an interview?

    Does one have to give an interview to run an article on them? Is there some protocol for magazines I am unaware of?

    Left wing nutjobs, coming to newsstands everywhere.

  6. #435326
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:41 am, pgtips said:

    How absolutely disgusting. They (US Mag) should be ashamed of themselves and I hope the general electorate will be able to see through such BS.

  7. #435327
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:45 am, atheling said:

    From Meghan McCain’s blog, I see that the Palins and McCains had a photo shoot with People Magazine.

    Wonder if we’ll see another hatchet job or a contrast in journalism.

  8. #435330
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:48 am, Jipc said:

    The hypocracy is unbelievable!!! Joe Scarborough is so disgusted because other politicians’ childrens antics have been hidden and/or surpressed by the media as a general rule. His ethics wouldn’t allow him to out these other cases (which I applaud), but I’m thinking it’s because there’s a strong woman behind the story (Palin) and the Dems/Libs press is running scared.

    I’ve stated on your blog several times before that I am a “Pro-Choice Republican” and proud of it, but what IS Pro-Choice if not the freedom to make either decision. I’ll probably be blasted, but it’s MY belief and I WILL stick by it.

    I am totally disgusted by the hits this poor woman-child is having to deal with publicly as well as the normal stresses that she’ll be dealing with having a baby, let alone so young. I now say a prayer daily for Bristol and her family to stay the course with strength and dignity. Shame on the MSM and poisonous blogging population that are perpetuating this “crime” of unethical attacks on a 17-year-old AND her supportive mother!!! It’s a private family matter that is NONE of their business!

  9. #435350
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 2:07 am, bayou22 said:

    Sarah Palin scares the hell out of the left because she appeals to so many of those they have been able to rely on in all-male (including Hillary) contests.

    However, this trash is what passes for journalism by the left when they can’t compete in the arena of ideas and they have nothing else… so they make stuff up and run with it…

    It’s not the first time and it sure won’t be the last. Sick people…

  10. #435353
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 2:11 am, AlohaGuy said:

    That’s a pretty cute baby. Must be Trig. Cute enough to be Calc… :)

  11. #435355
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 2:11 am, Micheleeroo said:

    I would like to add a thought somewhat in tandem to #8, whose comments I appreciate: Clearly #8 DOES actually believe in choice, but clearly those PDS’ing on the left only believe in ONE kind of choice.

  12. #435367
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 2:21 am, starlightwoman said:

    Professors like the one mentioned above are far and few between. We need more that have the courage to make his students think.

  13. #435392
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 3:11 am, Tommygun said:

    1. Beyond noting the obvious bias, notice the picture of Palin. That is not a good picture of her (not that she can really take a bad one!). Absolute twising and bias.

    2. On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:36 am, FIslam said:

    What does it say about Palin that she would grant US an interview?

    Based on this stupid question and other posts, me thinks there may be some trolling going on.

    Standing ready to be shown wrong.

  14. #435424
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:05 am, Sea_Dog said:

    I was glad for the McCain/Palin announcement for it gave me the opportunity to vote for someone instead of against someone. I hope Sarah Palin and her family have the strength and courage to hold up under these sleaze attacks that come not from just the MSM (ABC in particular) but also through unsolicited emails – ’nuff said on that.

    The US news media, of all venues, is more interested in viewer share/circulation than it is on the accuracy or appropriateness of what they cover/publish. The greater ‘outrage’ the better the figures to support their advertising rates. The only way to fight such a sleaze publication as US is to protest to their advertisers, letting them know that because they advertise with xxxx you will not purchase their products. The supporters of Jericho had a unique idea to register their feeling with the executive offices – they mailed packages of peanuts (in reference to Gerald McRay’s “Nuts” comment) – I would suggest perhaps gerbil food would be fitting to deliver to US. Perhaps the vast unpaid research department could provide the publisher/executive office address so that we won’t have to touch, let alone purchase, the rag to obtain it.

  15. #435438
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:53 am, MarcoPolo said:

    #11, I was pro-choice until a few conversations with liberals made me realize it meant they wanted the government to make the choices. As we march towards federal health “care,” I see it as only a matter of time before the laws demand that undesirable fetuses be aborted.

  16. #435443
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 6:14 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Harsh, nasty articles I am sure–I am not about to read them.

    But that is a sweet picture of Senator and mamaObama, sweet smiles. It must have been terribly difficult to maintain those poses in a Downright Mean Country. Any ideas on that FIslam? But why isn’t mamaObama in a burka? Did Jerry Wright and Clypso Louis give her special dispensation? Her face and arms are showing, the little hussy!

    Hey Obama-Want to see Bitter?
    Look at your wife.

    WE SHOULD BE CIVIL-WE CONSERVATIVES?
    Not a chance.

  17. #435448
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 6:33 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:53 am,

    MarcoPolo said:

    #11, I was pro-choice until a few conversations with liberals made me realize it meant they wanted the government to make the choices. As we march towards federal health “care,” I see it as only a matter of time before the laws demand that undesirable fetuses be aborted.

    We have come close MarcoPolo

    German (NAZI)Applying Racial Hygiene
    Also proposed by those sweet old Progressives Woodrow Wilson and Oliver Wendel Holmes:

    The Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring, proclaimed on July 14, 1933 required physicians to register every case of hereditary illness known to them, except in women over forty-five years of age. Physicians could be fined for failing to comply. In 1934 the first year of the Law’s operation, nearly 4,000 people appealed against the decisions of sterilization authorities, 3,559 of the appeals failed. By the end of the Nazi regime, over 200 “Genetic Health Courts” were created, and under their rulings over 400,000 people were sterilized against their will.[1]

    Ah, a Brave New World.

    Hey Obama-Want to see Bitter?
    Look at your wife.

    WE SHOULD BE CIVIL-WE CONSERVATIVES?
    Not a chance.

  18. #435482
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:18 am, TxSkirt said:

    Let’s not get in a panic. If they are slinging mud this hard and fast they must see the writing of their inevitable defeat on the wall and be scared to death. The American people are smart and can see right through this crap.

  19. #435494
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:31 am, FamilyMan said:

    OK, We got it. Most of the media is biased. Us magazine is moronic at best. Reading such rages is like watching The Lifetime channel. ( Isn’t Rusty into the that?) A dear friend of mine is an editor of a respectable newspaper. We’ve had this discussion about the problems in journalism many times.
    He points out to me that the people who work for newspapers come from english major backgrounds. Their minds work from the emotional side of the brain. They have a difficult time keeping to the facts and staying away from the sensational. There are obvious exceptions. Sara Palin has her degree in journalism. When you listen to the MSM remember where they’re coming from and it will be easier to stomach.

  20. #435497
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:36 am, iamsaved said:

    The libs are like desperate movie vampires caught trying to get to their casket and a cross or holy water is blocking their path and daylight is fast approaching…

    They are striking out in every evil way they can think of to destroy the Palin family and McCain’s choice for VP.

    I’d suggest that all of the Palin’s (except Sarah) head for a nice secluded cabin in the mountains of Alaska with no television, newspapers, or any other communication devices and wait this storm out. I’m confident Sarah can take care of herself and emerge stronger than ever.

  21. #435517
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:57 am, Sidana said:

    You know the funny thing is that I have never bought this rag. I have fingered through it when some of the people that I work with bring it with them to work, and it’s there.

    Yes, I know, it’s the danger of loving to read. Sometimes in desperation that it’s there.

    I am NOT a fan of Hollywood. I think they are some of the sickest, most deranged people that we have in our country, and yet when this rag, or TMZ get’s a hold of them, I feel sorry for them.

    So I could never buy one. Now I never will so much as look at either magazine, or show. The Garbage is the only place these rags will go when they land at my desk.

  22. #435543
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:14 am, St. Louis Blue said:

    “It’s conceivable a 17-year-old girl just screwed the GOP,” Democratic strategist George Lakoff tells Us Weekly.

    My isn’t George (as Rush says “rhymes with”) Lakoff your typical classy Democrat. :roll:

  23. #435551
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:19 am, Lindsay said:

    I have heard that ABC, NBC and CBS did not air Fred Thompson’s speech last night. Media bias? What media socialist bias?

    To a certain degree, the media have always tried to control politics:
    Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle.
    THOMAS JEFFERSON,Jun. 11, 1807

    You can never get all the facts from just one newspaper, and unless you have all the facts, you cannot make proper judgments about what is going on. – Harry S Truman,1960

    My prayers are with Sarah Palin today and tonight.

    Sarah Palin must be doing something right:
    I have always felt that a politician is to be judged by the animosities he excites among his opponents.
    Sir Winston Churchill

  24. #435564
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 8:27 am, hatelibs said:

    Simply sickening!
    Mrs. BO down to earth????? What planet are these people living on? That country hating b*tch is as far from down to earth as any woman could be.
    I give up!

  25. #435623
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:07 am, lgm said:

    Every word of both articles is true: Palin’s home life is a mess (pregnant unmarried teen daughter) while the Obama home life is idyllic.

  26. #435675
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:32 am, tre said:

    It’s a sign of desperation. The Lame Stream Media is attacking a special-needs baby, and a pregnant teen.
    As the father of a special-needs child, that REALLY burns me!

  27. #435677
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:35 am, Regulus said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:31 am, FamilyMan said:

    A dear friend of mine is an editor of a respectable newspaper. We’ve had this discussion about the problems in journalism many times.

    He points out to me that the people who work for newspapers come from english major backgrounds. Their minds work from the emotional side of the brain.

    Actually, it’s worse than that. I’ll agree that a core defect of modern-day liberalism is its arrested adolescence, which is what happens when one of the key gateways to adulthood — the governing of emotions, instead of being governed by them — isn’t passed through.

    But the problem with many of today’s “journalists” is that because they mix emotionalism with the notion that they’re going to “change the world” through their craft, they fall into the trap of becoming that which they profess to hate:

    – To fight “liars” they resort to deception, dishonesty and distortion.

    – To fight “fundamentalists” they take on a black-and-white view of the world.

    – To guard against “The creeping Fascism of the Religious Right” they adopt a thuggish disposition toward anyone and anything they disagree with.

    – To “educate uninformed American voters” they become willfully ignorant propagandists.

    At a company I used to work for, I spent some time on its “Diversity” committee. One of the women in that group — a flaming liberal — often accused native English speakers of being intolerant by “Raising their voices” when a non-native speaker was having trouble understanding them. Yet — unsurprisingly — you see the same behavior on display by the “liberal” media: When stupid Americans don’t understand from their betters how they are supposed to think and vote, they resort to increasingly shrill, strident and hostile emotionalism to “get the message across.”

    The magazine in question is a marvelous case in point. “Hopenchange is peace, love and puppies! Palin is evil. EVIL! Don’t you understand?!?”

  28. #435678
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:35 am, RedRepub said:

    Look at the bright side (if there is one):

    Most readers of “Us” would never vote GOP . “Us” is preaching to the choir.

  29. #435681
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:36 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    Sacre bleu! The tabloids are running a cover story about a family with a teen pregnancy it tried to cover up? I can’t believe it!

    Why hasn’t Us run a cover about Obama’s pregnancy scandals? Because there are none! Do you expect Us Weekly to have a cover story linking O to Tony Rezko?

  30. #435708
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:54 am, RedDog said:

    WOW! What skill! In only three days US managed to compile such a magnificent cover piece and get it on the stands for all America to see! Wonder who helped them cobble together this steaming mound of feces so quickly?

  31. #435715
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:56 am, commonsensemom said:

    Family Man #19 said:

    When you listen to the MSM remember where they’re coming from and it will be easier to stomach.

    May it never get “easier to stomach.” Once it does, we’re on the slippery slope to accepting it, or ignoring it, and thereby giving our tacit approval. We have to fight injustice to stop it.

  32. #435724
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:00 am, Ordinary Coloradan said:

    RSS you jackass they did NOT cover it up.

    It was well known in Wasilla.

    What happened is jerks like you are trying to create a scandal where none exists because you candidate frankly sucks.

    And the press is pissed because they missed out on what everyone in Wasilla knew. The press in angry because they look stupid.

  33. #435732
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:05 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:00 am, Ordinary Coloradan said:
    RSS you jackass they did NOT cover it up.

    It was well known in Wasilla.

    What do you want the press do, go up to Alaska and ask the townsfolk what dirt they have on the Palin kids?

  34. #435734
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:05 am, DBNinKY said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:07 am, lgm said:

    Every word of both articles is true: Palin’s home life is a mess (pregnant unmarried teen daughter) while the Obama home life is idyllic.

    My friend, you have jumped the shark with that one; there is no taking your posts seriously any longer.

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:36 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    Why hasn’t Us run a cover about Obama’s pregnancy scandals? Because there are none!

    There are far worse rumors and innuendo surrounding Obama throughout the Internet.

  35. #435804
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:32 am, 7thson said:

    Every word of both articles is true: Palin’s home life is a mess (pregnant unmarried teen daughter) while the Obama home life is idyllic.

    “There, hee hee hee, that will get them riled…” is what I am sure went through your pathetic fawning sycophantic brain as you posted your latest spew. We expect you repeat talking points; now you have shown that you believe them to be scriptural: “every word…is true”?

    Stop writing what the voices are saying in your head!!

  36. #435811
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:37 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    There are far worse rumors and innuendo surrounding Obama throughout the Internet.

    Would that be the Cocaine Clown Obama, or do we speak of another?

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:07 am, lgm said:

    Every word of both articles is true: Palin’s home life is a mess (pregnant unmarried teen daughter) while the Obama home life is idyllic.

    Good Morning lgm and Happy God Damn America to you! Yes Governor Palin does have some work to do before she becomes our next Vice President and your Anointed One has to go back to hustling coke in the Senate and Michelle gets the big bucks for doing little in the Hospital District. Have a nice day.

    Hey Obama-Want to see Bitter?
    Look at your wife.

    WE SHOULD BE CIVIL-WE CONSERVATIVES?
    Not a chance.

  37. #435838
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:44 am, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:07 am, lgm said:
    Every word of both articles is true: Palin’s home life is a mess (pregnant unmarried teen daughter) while the Obama home life is idyllic.

    Hey lgm, do you have any facts to back that up or are you using the proven biased reproting as the basis for your statement? Don’t you think the left media could find a lot of “dirt” on Obama’s family if they applied the same lack of ethics and lack of common decency in investigating his family as they apply to the Palin family?

  38. #435888
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:55 am, txvet2 said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:07 am, lgm said:

    Every word of both articles is true: Palin’s home life is a mess (pregnant unmarried teen daughter) while the Obama home life is idyllic.

    How does that make Obama any less an inexperienced, incompetent idiot who can’t put together a coherent sentence without a teleprompter? Go away, troll, nobody’s in the mood today.

  39. #435890
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:55 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Last Massachusetts Conservative lgm and the other web bot trolls, as with all Liberals, do not need FACTS. Their idea of facts is ‘whatever fits’. While Liberals lie they FEEL and FEELING means never having to tell the truth.
    And that Last Massachusetts Conservative is why God gave us Scotch and Soda. Wonderful, ain’t it? Pull up a chair lad!

  40. #435892
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:55 am, 7thson said:

    Hey lgm,

    One last thing. Governor Palin’s lif is a mess? Your Prophet,Odumbo, says we have to take care of the “least of these” (a pandering scripture reference, plagiarized as usual). Governor Palin walks that talk by welcoming Trig and Bristol’s baby into life and family. Barry can’t even spot his half-brother in Africa a twenty to double his standard of living.

    Obama’s home life is idyllic? I looked up the word “bitter” in the dictionary and it said “see Michele Obama”.

  41. #435931
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:07 am, whoozit said:

    lgm:
    How do you know that Obama’s homelife is idyllic? Do you stalk them? Do you hide under their dining room table?

    Do you mean that as soon as their daughter (who will soon be an adult herself) marries or moves out, the Palin family will also return to being idyllic?

    Unless you are a fly on the wall BEHIND closed doors, you don’t know JACK about the happiness of ANY FAMILY.

  42. #435940
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:11 am, Bill Mack said:

    Sacre bleu! The tabloids are running a cover story about a family with a teen pregnancy it tried to cover up? I can’t believe it!

    Why hasn’t Us run a cover about Obama’s pregnancy scandals? Because there are none! Do you expect Us Weekly to have a cover story linking O to Tony Rezko?

    A pregnant daughter is not a scandal. It is a fact of life. Being in bed with a crook is a scandal.

  43. #435986
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:26 am, tre said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 10:05 am, Red State Skeptic said:What do you want the press do, go up to Alaska and ask the townsfolk what dirt they have on the Palin kids?

    It’s called “research”, Skeptic. You know, when one asks questions of people who know the answers instead of making stuff up?

    Why hasn’t Us run a cover about Obama’s pregnancy scandals? Because there are none! Do you expect Us Weekly to have a cover story linking O to Tony Rezko?

    Friendships with terrorists, membership in an anti-white, anti-American Church for 20 years, and land deals with a criminal are FAR worse than a wayward child. And, why will that magazine tell all about Sara Palins wayward child, but not about a wayward Presidential candidate?

  44. #436014
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:37 am, Zippy_Slug said:

    I’ve said it once.. and I’ll have to say it until I die..

    F-U drive by media!

  45. #436037
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 11:49 am, walterc said:

    A pregnant daughter is not a scandal. It is a fact of life. Being in bed with a crook is a scandal.

    Being a close associate with a known/self professed terrorist is a scandal.

    Can someone explain to me how becoming a grandmother earlier than preferred affects how she would perform her duties as VP? Can someone explain to me how a politician from such a “dysfunctional family” gets a nearly 90% approval rating from her constituents?

    Can we get some discussion on how she stands on the issues? How ’bout some discussion on where JoeBiden stands on the issues?

  46. #436087
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:06 pm, TypicalWhite said:

    Well, I actually sympathize a bit with the left-wing rags. So much puffery and so little real power. They try and try and try, but they just can’t turn this country into the socialist state they want.

    Nasty is all they’ve got, and that’s pathetic. I’m glad I don’t have to get up and look in their mirror every morning.

  47. #436189
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 12:46 pm, TheOtherSide said:

    Yes, when I think of real media I think of US magazine.

  48. #436334
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:38 pm, yohannbiimu said:

    The leftist ghouls are slinking out of their holes.

    I’d like to add to this that Obama’s existance is a result of scandal. His mother (Ann Dunham) was not married when he was conceieved, and her circumstances are very similar to Palin’s daughter.

    The difference is that Federally subsidized abortions and its availability and legality were 180 degrees different in the early 1960’s and today. What are the chances that Ann Dunham aborts her “mistake” rather than having to marry a man who would abandon her a few years later?

    When you see how the left treat Sarah Palin’s daughter’s situation, you’d have to think that if they had been able to get ahold of Ann Dunham in 1961, they would have tried to pursuade her to abort their own SAVIOR. Ann Dunham was a posterchild for Planned Parenthood, and Barack Obama should thank his lucky stars (or whatever it is that he prays to) that abortion was not nearly as available as it is today.

    Meanwhile, Obama touts Planned Parenthood and it’s active destruction of tens of millions of his African-American brothers and sisters. The man has no soul.

  49. #436755
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 4:17 pm, lonewolf said:

    With reference to post # 34… when have lgm’s remarks ever been taken seriously?? I think he is just a comic relief troll..

  50. #437036
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 5:52 pm, larkabee said:

    Saw this in a comment on another Web site:

    If Sarah Palin was friends with William Ayers, do you think the MSM would actually report on it?

  51. #437060
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 6:00 pm, redpeach said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:07 am, lgm said:

    Every word of both articles is true: Palin’s home life is a mess (pregnant unmarried teen daughter) while the Obama home life is idyllic.

    my oldest sister got pregnant at 18 and while it was difficult for our family in no way was our home life “a mess” and it in no way diminished the fact that my mother was an absolutely incredible parent. my sister had the baby, married the father, is still married to him 18 years later, they have four wonderful children they adore, and run a thriving business together. it was hardly a “mess” then and nowhere close a “mess” now. your leap in logic only proves you’re the biggest idiot of all the trolls here. and i honestly can’t believe i just fed one, but no one who has ever had personal experience with teenage pregnancy should stay silent about the beating sarah palin is getting from the msm. by claiming she’s a bad mother or their home life is a mess because of a situation her daughter is in is a slap in the face to millions of women like my mother who have seen their children make mistakes for no other reason than THEY ARE HUMAN and not because of anything they did or did not do as parents.

  52. #437087
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 6:09 pm, redpeach said:

    oh, and lgm, while i’m at it, MY SISTER WAS ON BIRTH CONTROL. WHICH MY MOTHER HELPED HER GET. so don’t go off making another one of your libtard fantasyland assumptions that if my mother and sister had been open and honest about sex this never would have happened. clearly based on your comment you are good at making them, so for the sake of fairness, how do we know sarah palin and her daughter weren’t open and honest about sex? WE DON’T, AND IT’S NOT OUR BUSINESS ANYWAY.

  53. #437281
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:55 pm, BeLinda said:

    I stopped looking at tabloids, other than pointing out flat out lies on their covers, years ago. They’ve tried to ruin so many celebrites by making up the most horrible lies, and now on top of it they’re adding conservative politicians to their slime time.

    Now they attack my two loves, entertainment and politics. I’ll have to try and keep myself from even fighting with the covers now.

    And, I hate to burst the lovely liberals bubbles, but I’m sure there are skeletons in Obama’s closest no one even knows about. It’s just, you know, not cool to talk about it…

  54. #437286
    On September 3rd, 2008 at 7:58 pm, BeLinda said:

    #53 *entertainment and conservative politics.

  55. #437983
    On September 4th, 2008 at 12:11 am, FIslam said:

    Ooops! You are correct Michelle (#4), my misread on that one. I assumed they did interview her, and did a San Francisco hit job on her. My mistake.

    And Ouch! Goldbug or Unlucky #13…may Wolf Blitzer come to you in a dream under your Troll Bridge.

  56. #438112
    On September 4th, 2008 at 12:45 am, Bob in Myrtle Beach said:

    UsWeekly… not even worth wrapping fish in it. It’d just taint the fish.

  57. #438214
    On September 4th, 2008 at 1:24 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 9:07 am, lgm said:

    Every word of both articles is true: Palin’s home life is a mess (pregnant unmarried teen daughter)

    while the Obama home life is idyllic.

    Good one, lgm! You actually made me laugh out loud. You are endearingly naive.

  58. #438223
    On September 4th, 2008 at 1:28 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    Hey, it just occurred to me: What if lgm is really Obama? It would explain much.

  59. #438402
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:05 am, Blackwatch said:

    Until people understand ‘Liberals’ are NOT Democrats but a ‘newer’ name for Marxist Communists, nothing will change…

  60. #439419
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:34 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Every word of both articles is true: Palin’s home life is a mess (pregnant unmarried teen daughter) while the Obama home life is idyllic.

    Nope – no messianic tendencies there. Good gracious, did you write that with a straight face?

    Memo, lgm: Anyone who says their home life is always perfect is one of two things:

    1) Insane

    2) Lying

    No one has an “idyllic” home life.

    So get over yourself and stop kissing the ground the Obama’s walk on. Groveling does not become you.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Connecting the “media justice” dots

November 3, 2009 01:50 PM by Michelle Malkin

18 Comments | 1 Trackback

MoveOn demands that Democrats stay off Fox News

October 20, 2009 02:36 PM by Michelle Malkin

138 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Obama’s Fox News policy: Isolation over engagement

October 19, 2009 12:02 PM by Michelle Malkin

59 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Plus: Anita Dunn on getting around the “filter.”

Who’s behind the White House war on Fox News?

October 14, 2009 05:06 AM by Michelle Malkin

130 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Fox News Derangement Syndrome strikes again

October 13, 2009 08:29 AM by Michelle Malkin

136 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

All-whine zone.

Sarah Palin: “Going Rogue”

September 28, 2009 05:52 PM by Michelle Malkin

96 Comments | 13 Trackbacks


Categories: Media Bias, Sarah Palin




HotAir GreenRoom