Liberal men in a panic; Update: liberal women spinning, too

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 4, 2008 12:36 AM

Scroll for updates…

Harry Reid is attacking Palin as “shrill.” Look under “gall” in the dictionary for a photo of Harry Reid.

The shrilliest of the shrill Democrat shills is calling Gov. Palin “shrill?”

They just can’t keep a lid on the chauvinism, can they?

Speaking of which, reader Mike G. e-mails after watching the flustered MSNBC jerks:

I decided to suffer through a few minutes of the gasbags on NBC and just as I tune in I hear Olbermann saying oh so sternly, “I have to wonder though, if the sarcasm was the proper tone.”

Right. Because only liberal men who are attacking conservatives are allowed to employ sarcasm in the service of Hope and Change.

***

Here you go:

Sen. Harry Reid isn’t about to back away from a fight, even with the VP pick. This response comes from Reid’s spokesman Jim Manley after Sarah Palin attacked the senator in her speech tonight:

“Anyone who knows Senator Reid knows he never backs down when he’s fighting for what’s right and that he always stands up to John McCain when he is wrong,” Reid’s spokesman said.

“Shrill and sarcastic political attacks may fire up the Republican base, but they don’t change the fact that a McCain-Palin administration would mean four more years of failed bush-Cheney policies.”

***

Update 12:55am Eastern. Oh, triple-crikey. Democrat Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (a mother of three herself who was profiled sympathetically in the old WaPo piece I blogged out a few days ago) is on CNN seriously arguing that nooooooo one on the Left has argued that Palin can’t juggle motherhood and the vice presidency at the same time.

Rep. Wasserman Schultz, meet Sally Quinn and Ed Schultz, etc., etc., etc.

See also: Clinton aides: Palin treatment sexist

Georgetown University professor Deborah Tannen, who has written best-selling books on gender differences, said she agrees with complaints that Palin skeptics — including prominent voices in the news media — have crossed a line by speculating about whether the Alaska governor is neglecting her family in pursuit of national office.

“What we’re dealing with now, there’s nothing subtle about it,” said Tannen. “We’re dealing with the assumption that child-rearing is the job of women and not men. Is it sexist? Yes.”

***

Update: Kyle-Anne Shiver…Palin rules, libs drool.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Sarah Palin

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #101
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:33 am, Goldwater Knight said:

    Take a look at today’s LA Times. Gloria Steinem is having a royal hissy-fit over Palin.

    LA Times is lucky they can fight off bankruptcy let alone squeeze a few paragraphs out on MS Word.

  2. #102
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:33 am, FamilyMan said:

    By Gloria Steinem
    September 4, 2008
    Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Clinton.

    Thank God!

  3. #103
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:35 am, almiller said:

    The Obama problem is the affirmative action problem. You can’t say Obama has no accomplishments because its an affront to affirmative action.

    We all must remember that Hans Christian Andersen cleaned up his Emperor’s New Clothes story. What really happened to the little child who said the emperor was naked was too savage and too brutal to write down. To this day the emperor is still naked and little children have disappeared screaming for noticing.

    Thus it is with the clean articulate and bright affirmative action candidate.

  4. #104
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:35 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:33 am, FamilyMan said:

    By Gloria Steinem
    September 4, 2008
    Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Clinton.

    Thank God!

    Amen to that.

  5. #105
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:36 am, FamilyMan said:

    By Gloria Steinem
    September 4, 2008
    Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Clinton.

    Thank God!

  6. #106
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:37 am, FamilyMan said:

    opps; sorry double post

  7. #107
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:39 am, Daria said:

    Sarah is phenomenal! She thoroughly trounced the disgraceful media sychophants and their concocted messiah — I could almost smell the aroma of “drive-by” carcasses at the end of her briliant speech. Love the fact that she smiles genuinely while she filets her opponents. This woman is a force to be reckoned with and a real role-model for women and men.

    And as the sister of a Down Syndrome brother, I deeply appreciated her genuine commitment to making America a better place for special needs children. I will never forget the sweet image of Piper smoothing her baby brother’s hair while her mother was making history. I thought I was energized after her speech last week, but unbelievably, I am even more jazzed now. McCain-Palin ’08!

  8. #108
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:45 am, Daria said:

    By the way, Mort Kondracke, I didn’t think it was possible to “outdo” yourself after your disgusting comments about Bristol Palin the other night…then you trot out the tired meme that Sarah didn’t write her speech. Good thing Brit was there to set both you and Nina Easton straight! Did you really think the public is gullible enough to believe politicians actually write their own speeches?

    Thank God for C-SPAN. I have no idea why FOX didn’t deem Mitt Romney’s speech (and Huck’s) worthy of full coverage, but it was a bad call on their part to keep the talking heads (especially Alan Colmes)on the air, while prominent Republicans were firing up the crowd.

  9. #109
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:46 am, Daria said:

    Oh, it should be “brilliant” in my earlier post. So excited I can’t type straight…lol! :)

  10. #110
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:47 am, Socky said:

    Gloria Steinem? That fossil? The last time I saw her was at the beginning of Jurassic Park I. Sam Neill was digging her carcass out of the ground just before the scene with the androgynous fat kid.

  11. #111
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:48 am, tamarah180 said:

    Analysis: GOP contradicts self on Palin family By TED ANTHONY, AP National Writer
    Wed Sep 3, 11:48 PM ET

    Huh? The Republican message about the Palin offspring comes across as contradictory: Hey, media, leave those kids alone — so we can use them as we see fit.

    If you doubt this scenario, consider this: On Wednesday morning, a teenage boy from Alaska stood in a receiving line on an airport tarmac, being glad-handed by the potential next president of the United States — because he got his girlfriend pregnant. TV cameras were lined up in advance. The mind boggles.

    “Either the children are out of bounds, and you don’t put them in the photo ops, or you don’t complain when somebody wants to talk about them. You can’t have it both ways,” said John Matviko, a professor at West Liberty State College in West Virginia and editor of “The American President in Popular Culture.”

    “Right now, it looks like they’re being used by the campaign more than the media are using them,” he said.

    Barack Obama said flatly that the Palin kids should be “off limits,” but he has engaged in the same thing — though to a lesser extent.

    In July, he and his wife, Michelle, appeared on a four-part “Access Hollywood” interview with daughters Malia, 10, and Sasha, 7. Obama later expressed regret about his decision to put them forward, saying, “I don’t think it’s healthy, and it’s something that we’ll be avoiding in the future.”

    Nevertheless, the Obama girls have made other appearances. They stepped on stage twice at the Democratic National Convention last week — once to talk to their father via video hookup after their mother’s speech, and again after Obama accepted the nomination during the convention’s climactic moment.

    This POS reporter doesn’t even see the stupidity of what he wrote — and the bias!

    And now you know another reason why Yahoo News took down their comments section: BECAUSE THEY DON”T CARE WHAT WE THINK!!!

    G-r-r-r-r-r!

    I know, I know – click the link to real news – Debka.com…LOL

  12. #112
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:52 am, FamilyMan said:

    Rudy’s New York, in your face, attack dog with a southern oldtimie delivery was great.

  13. #113
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:52 am, Daria said:

    I haven’t actually clicked over, but just from reading the “Buzzworthy” column, it appears Debbie Schlussel isn’t too happy with the choice of Sarah Palin. Oh well! I guess it proves there’s room for disagreement on our side. I respect Debbie for her intelligence and insight (especially in the arena of radical Islam), but she’s completely on the wrong side of this argument, IMHO.

  14. #114
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:53 am, Daria said:

    Rudy was awesome….best speech I’ve ever seen him give! :)

  15. #115
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:54 am, milesfromkansas said:

    Yeah, I read part of that Politico piece, until I got to this paragraph:

    “… The mother of five — with one pregnant teenage daughter and an infant son with Down syndrome — has joined a parade of personalities from Anita Hill to O.J. Simpson to Monica Lewinsky to become a cultural flash point.”

    And Politico is non-partisan… riiiight.

  16. #116
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:55 am, BemusedLib said:

    Now that the evil MSM is falling all over itself to give Governor Palin a series of big wet kisses, can we move past all the whining. Too bad if some in the media had the temerity to point out that the all-negative, all the time tone of last night might be covering up one of the GP{s major weaknesses (they’re wrong on all the issues) but apparently the kool-aid was only available on the floor, not the press box.

    Palin proved that she is indeed a fine pit bull with lipstick, and she was eloquent in reminding us that John McCain was once a POW. She clearly got the base going. What she failed to do was make a compelling positive case for herself or her ticket based on actual issues.

    PS: How much does Romney hate McCain to make a speech that bad? And, is anybody more in love with themselves than Giuliani? Huck was pretty good, though.

  17. #117
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:57 am, jlhudg23 said:

    OXYMORON ALERT: “Liberal men”.

    FACT: There are no “liberal” men. Real men are conservative.

  18. #118
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:57 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:54 am, milesfromkansas said:

    And Politico is non-partisan… riiiight.

    I think it depends on who is writing the column with them. I found this article there that shows even Clinton aides are saying that the media’s treatment of Palin is sexist.

  19. #119
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:58 am, FamilyMan said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:54 am, milesfromkansas said:And Politico is non-partisan… riiiight.

    Compared to the MSM. Yes. I wouldn’t count on anybodies help. Were on our own.

  20. #120
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:01 am, b-cat said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:58 am, FamilyMan said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:54 am, milesfromkansas said:And Politico is non-partisan… riiiight.

    Compared to the MSM. Yes. I wouldn’t count on anybodies help. Were on our own

    .

    We always are. And we are better for it.

  21. #121
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:04 am, DesertLover said:

    *** Photoshop Request ***

    How about a photoshop of Sarah next to an Obama bus with flat tires …

    “taking the air out of the no=oil bus”

    Sarah rocks … period …

  22. #122
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:05 am, Socky said:

    Yesterday’s spin from DerangedLib (“She had it coming!”) is now replaced by today’s spin, (“What media attacks? Olbermann only called her a ‘Nazi skank’ off-mic.”)

  23. #123
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:05 am, Ron Rockstar said:

    Not all liberals were negative about Palin. I was watching Chris Wallace interview Mark Wolfson. It went something like this:
    CW: You guys have a real problem on your hands
    MW: You got that right, she kicked our butts.
    CW: The jabs she took at Obama and Biden were masterful.
    MW: Wow, awesome just awesome. She shredded those punks like cheese.
    CW: Hey wait, we have you on here for the opposition opinion. You have to say something bad about Sarah Palin.
    MW: Well I disagree with everything she says, but, she is awesome and she kicked our liberal little butts.

  24. #124
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:06 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:55 am, BemusedLib said:

    Your just mad because she so easily ripped apart Obama. Even your fawning MSM admits this. I kinda wish she was at the top of the ticket because she would have him um-ing and uh-ing during the presidential debates. She would show him to the country as the empty suit that he is.

  25. #125
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:07 am, Ron Rockstar said:

    Sorry that was Howard Wolfson not Mark Wolfson. I always call that guy Mark for some reason.

  26. #126
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:08 am, St. Louis Blue said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:55 am, BemusedLib said:

    What she failed to do was make a compelling positive case for herself or her ticket based on actual issues.

    Looks like someone missed all the references to cutting taxes and increasing energy production. Not unexpected. BefuddledLib misses a lot.

    You can catch him/her/it down at the Free Clinic pushing on the door marked PULL.

  27. #127
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:09 am, DesertLover said:

    should have been “no-oil bus” … it’s still early on the west coast … :lol:

  28. #128
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:09 am, Goldwater Knight said:

    BemusedLib said:

    What she failed to do was make a compelling positive case for herself or her ticket based on actual issues.

    Well OK, fine and dandy. Why don’t you outline what the specifics are when you say this. Seems like a luke warm ad hominem.

  29. #129
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:11 am, FilmLadd said:

    BemusedLib said:

    Palin proved that she is indeed a fine pit bull with lipstick, and she was eloquent in reminding us that John McCain was once a POW. She clearly got the base going. What she failed to do was make a compelling positive case for herself or her ticket based on actual issues.

    Hive-mind, stop talking in the omniscient. She failed to make a compelling positive case for you. She will never be able to do this for you, since (at this point at least) she is fundamentally opposed to collectivism.

    Since your brain is encapsulated within the collective, any trumpeting of individualism is basically poison to you.

    Hive-mind is scared of individualism. Poor hive-mind.

  30. #130
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:12 am, St. Louis Blue said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:47 am, Socky said:

    Gloria Steinem? That fossil? The last time I saw her was at the beginning of Jurassic Park I. Sam Neill was digging her carcass out of the ground just before the scene with the androgynous fat kid.

    Gloria Steinem?!? :lol:
    Rumor has it that her OB/Gyn is a practicing paleontologist. Rock on, GS! :lol:

  31. #131
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:13 am, ajmontana said:

    Bemutantlib asking if we can move past all the Whining. thats rich.

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′

  32. #132
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:13 am, Socky said:

    Daria and the other thoughtful women of Michelle Malkin’s blog, do you think most of the animus toward Sarah Palin comes from her being pro-life and both walking the walk and talking the talk? Do you think the feminist fossils like Gloria Steinem and Cecile Richards are attacking her because when she goes on stage with those adorable children, it’s a stark reminder of all the babies (40 million or so) that have been sucked into a sink in the name of feminism? Do you think they hate her for making it as a wife and a mother and a very successful politician, giving lie to the myths that leftist feminism depends on? e.g. If you get pregnant when you’re young, your life is over, so you have to have an abortion.

  33. #133
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:16 am, sonofdy said:

    What she failed to do was make a compelling positive case for herself or her ticket based on actual issues.

    All of a sudden the left cares about the issues? :lol:

  34. #134
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:16 am, St. Louis Blue said:

    The site is vaporizing posts again. :(

    Come back see-dubya!!!

  35. #135
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:18 am, Christopher Estep said:

    I wonder how long it will be before they start calling her “hysterical”. Can “bitch” be far behind? What about “rawr!” as in a cat fight?

    Please? Pretty, please? I hope they keep the sexism up. As Michelle said yesterday, they’ve awakened the sleeping giant of Republican and conservative women and to continue the analogy, our women are about to go Hiroshima and Nagasaki on their collective asses!

  36. #136
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:18 am, St. Louis Blue said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:47 am, Socky said:

    Gloria Steinem? That fossil? The last time I saw her was at the beginning of Jurassic Park I. Sam Neill was digging her carcass out of the ground just before the scene with the androgynous fat kid.

    I’ve heard that her 08/6yn is a practicing paleontologist. Rock on Gloria.

    BTW: 08/6 = OB/G

  37. #137
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:19 am, tarpon said:

    Who to vote for, the racists anti-American black guy and the doofus, or all American war hero, and his all American Conservative woman running mate. Tough choices, unless you know what country you live in.

  38. #138
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:19 am, radio relay said:

    Awesome speech!!!

    Biden, evidently is walking point on the response. He was on the three network morning shows to “respond” immediately after they did their obligatory reports pointing out that she didn’t mention Afghanistan (WHAT???). Also, that she didn’t mention anything about the Bush administration, bla, bla, bla. Oh, and of course, he was too busy to watch the entire speech anyway (IDIOT/LIAR!!)…. I guess that’s the best the dems can do.

    She nailed their liberal hides to the wall!!

  39. #139
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:20 am, FilmLadd said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:16 am, sonofdy said:

    What she failed to do was make a compelling positive case for herself or her ticket based on actual issues.

    All of a sudden the left cares about the issues? :lol:

    Irony always escapes the collective. Issues, truth, ideas, values, facts, the past, the present – these are all mere tools to achieve the ultimate goal of destruction the individual.

  40. #140
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:21 am, Socky said:

    All of a sudden the left cares about the issues?

    No, just throwing everything in the kitchen at Sarah Palin in hopes that something will stick.

    The criticisms of Obama stick because they had truth to them. Making up sh-t about Palin just doesn’t have the impact. Also, there’s a certain absurdity to the D Presidential nominee picking fights with the R VP nominee. What a brilliant demonstration of how little stature Obama has.

  41. #141
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:23 am, FilmLadd said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:13 am, Socky said:

    Do you think they hate her for making it as a wife and a mother and a very successful politician, giving lie to the myths that leftist feminism depends on?

    Well, I’m not female, but my take goes deeper. They hate Palin because they hate freedom for the individual. All the other reasons they cite and we may derive is smokescreen.

  42. #142
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:25 am, Socky said:

    Yeah, the left is not real big on individualism except as a fashion statement.

  43. #143
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:26 am, BemusedLib said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:16 am, sonofdy said:

    What she failed to do was make a compelling positive case for herself or her ticket based on actual issues.

    All of a sudden the left cares about the issues? :lol:

    Of course we care about issues, that’s why we’re liberals. If we were interested in flag lapel pins and bluster, we’d be on your side.

    (Aside) hey — sonofdy. That McWhorter guy you quoted on Black Liberation Theology: all of the sudden he’s everywhere. A nice non-partisan piece on political speechmaking http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=01f466fc-0dc2-4053-aa2e-fbe2b4c51ca6, a modestly interesting take on Obama’s speech http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2008/08/29/mcwhorter-my-problems-with-the-speech.aspx and an appearance on The Colbert Report.

    Interestingly, despite his distaste for BLT, he’s apparently decided that Obama was uninfected: he’s supporting Obama this fall./aside

  44. #144
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:28 am, happyscrapper said:

    Hopefully, this won’t post twice…it seemed to get hung up the first time I tried. I heard George Stuffanappleupyoura$$ this a.m. talking about the democrats’ reaction to Palin’s speech. He said, and I paraphrase, “They’re not sure how to take her. They are puzzled by her and puzzled by the intense reaction of the republicans to her.” O.K. That is the bottom line of all of this! The left wing democrats have so lost touch with “middle American” culture and values that they are left clueless! They really truly don’t get it! Their elitism has so taken over their thinking processes that the good old fashioned down-home folks who make up the entire center (And Alaska!!) of this country are like foreigners to them. We are going to squash them like bugs. Sarah Palin’s speech last night told the lefties…”You want to try and mess with us? YOu want to try and trash our families and our traditions? You want to take God away from this country? You want to keep vicitimhood as a way of controlling the masses? Well, BRING. IT. ON. Sarah Palin and her entire family epitomize what personal responsibility and toughness are all about. I am so pumped!

  45. #145
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:28 am, b-cat said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:25 am, Socky said:
    Yeah, the left is not real big on individualism except as a fashion statement.

    They do like individuality where it traditionally doesn’t fit, i.e. the military. But of course, that is in order to weaken the military.

  46. #146
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:29 am, sonofdy said:

    Interestingly, despite his distaste for BLT, he’s apparently decided that Obama was uninfected: he’s supporting Obama this fall

    Then he is a fool.

  47. #147
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:30 am, travlinman said:

    The party of “progressives” sure don’t seem very progressive. Palin can’t be taken serious because of her hairstlye being ’20 years’ out of date!

    http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1116858

    Where were the hair articles for Kerry in 2004, and Joe Biden this year? I also thought that fashions and styles rolled back into vogue every so often? No?
    I bet Palin starts a whole new look for real American women. Feminine, fresh and sexy. Like our own MM, and my better-half! Not suggesting that any of our fine conservative females on this site are not sexy, if your hair is short; your view-points make you sexy.
    Palin would be sexy even if she looked like (gulp) Helen Thomas (gag). Thank God, she does not!

    1st Disclaimer: My idea of sexy does not apply to liberals. I have to wear the ‘Cabo Wabo’ goggles to even look at most liberal women, because the beer goggles don’t get it done.

    2nd Disclaimer: No honey, I would not… I don’t own any goggles, cause I only have eyes for you! I was only trying to make a poin… I’m sorry… I have not even been looki… not the frying pan…sexy in a figurative sens…Owww, dang it!…

  48. #148
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:31 am, Socky said:

    At the NYT blog, anyone want to play Spot the Moby.

  49. #149
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:32 am, sonofdy said:

    You don’t go to a church for 22 years and remain “uninfected”. Gezzz, some people will buy anything.

  50. #150
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:35 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Daria and the other thoughtful women of Michelle Malkin’s blog, do you think most of the animus toward Sarah Palin comes from her being pro-life and both walking the walk and talking the talk?

    It’s both about what she represents and how unapologetic she is about it all. She’s proud to be a mother, wife, governor, hunter, hockey mom, etc…. She’s super woman only better. I’m sure her family’s sacrifice was a tough load to bear at times but damn they look genuinely happy.

    Do you think the feminist fossils like Gloria Steinem and Cecile Richards are attacking her because when she goes on stage with those adorable children, it’s a stark reminder of all the babies (40 million or so) that have been sucked into a sink in the name of feminism?

    I think it gives them pause because their whole mantra is that you cannot be all of the things Sarah is and still be respected. Do they realize just how wrong they are – probably not. There’s nothing more stubborn than a mule, than an old mule.

    Do you think they hate her for making it as a wife and a mother and a very successful politician, giving lie to the myths that leftist feminism depends on? e.g. If you get pregnant when you’re young, your life is over, so you have to have an abortion.

    Yes. She climbed the ladder without them and is poised to make history. Screw the glass ceiling.

  51. #151
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:35 am, FilmLadd said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:26 am, BemusedLib said:

    Of course we care about issues, that’s why we’re liberals. If we were interested in flag lapel pins and bluster, we’d be on your side.

    Note, if you will dear reader, that hive-mind does not want to acknowledge that it has been called out.

    Frightened, it uses the well-worn tactic of “issues.” It does not say what those “issues” are, which are designed, of course, to generate victory for the collective and destruction of the individual.

    Like a squid, it squirts out a gooey hazy ink and swims away with an ineffective invective about flag lapel pins.

    Swim hive-mind, swim!

  52. #152
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:36 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:26 am, BemusedLib said:

    Of course we care about issues, that’s why we’re liberals. If we were interested in flag lapel pins and bluster, we’d be on your side.

    Of course they care about issues. What they want are things like infanticide on demand, higher taxes, bigger government, less freedom, and socialism.

    What they don’t want to talk about is experience. Don’t anyone mention that Obama has no experience. That topic is off limits.

  53. #153
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:37 am, radio relay said:

    Of course we care about issues, that’s why we’re liberals.

    Did you giggle a little bit while you were writing that, “Bemused”, because I got a huge laugh out it!

    appearance on The Colbert Report

    My, my, my… How fricken relevant is that?!?

  54. #154
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:37 am, Socky said:

    Further amusement, check out the deranged comments under this cute vid of Piper Palin holding her baby brother. Here’s a sample:

    her fascist mother is a gun-toting religious extremist who likes to shoot wolves from aircraft (to name just one of her disgusting hobbies).
    Unfortunately, I have absolutely no faith in the US voters who have repeatedly proved to be a bunch of idiots.

  55. #155
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:38 am, St. Louis Blue said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:31 am, Socky said:

    At the NYT blog, anyone want to play Spot the Moby.

    Sorry, Socky. Too early in the day month year decade century to look at the other Times.

  56. #156
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:38 am, BemusedLib said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:29 am, sonofdy said:

    Interestingly, despite his distaste for BLT, he’s apparently decided that Obama was uninfected: he’s supporting Obama this fall

    Then he is a fool.

    Then, possibly, you shouldn’t quote him in support of your arguments.

    Given that the conservatives have combed through every word Rev. Wright published or uttered and found, what one? damning quote, it’s a pretty god bet that most Sundays were not devoted to political cant, but rather “normal” church stuff. Or that he’s not actually that radical after all.

  57. #157
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:39 am, wighttrasch said:

    I heard Biden on the TV this morning. All I can say is…

    Jerkstore!

    I’m goin’ with jerkstore!

  58. #158
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:40 am, Socky said:

    Hivemind’s beloved candidate’s campaign instructs its volunteers not to talk about issues, but instead talk about “How they came to Obama.”

    Said beloved candidate has also refused to debate McCain ten times, man-to-messiah, on the issues in a townhall forum.

  59. #159
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:41 am, sonofdy said:

    BemusedLib: Okay lets talk issues. Attacks in Iraq are now down over 95% allowing a poltical solution to go forward. This was the plan since 2003. Now Obama and Biden opposed the surge that made this possiable, yet propose to do the same in Afganistan. What do you think it says about the when they oppose a tactic that was proven to work and yet support that same tactic at the same time?

  60. #160
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:42 am, et said:

    The panic extends far beyond Team Obama. Today every state democrat party and every national democrat committee will be meeting to figure out what to do next.

    Politics is a contact sport and sometimes candidates lob grenades. Last night Sarah and John McCain’s Republican Party launched ‘Shock and Awe’ against the whole democrat party.

  61. #161
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:43 am, FilmLadd said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:38 am, BemusedLib said:

    Given that the conservatives have combed through every word Rev. Wright published or uttered and found, what one? damning quote, it’s a pretty god bet that most Sundays were not devoted to political cant, but rather “normal” church stuff. Or that he’s not actually that radical after all.

    Now hive-mind attempts to diminish the opposition by glossing over pertinent facts and history. Hive-mind uses this tactic often. It has proven effective in ensnaring others into its collective thought. Others too mentally weak or lazy to research history are always easy prey for the hive-mind.

    Stalin had his minions modify old newspapers in libraries to his favor. Hitler wiped out his hometown with the German army to erase some of his past.

    Yes, hive-mind, this might work. You may indeed prove victorious against individualism.

  62. #162
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:44 am, sonofdy said:

    Then, possibly, you shouldn’t quote him in support of your arguments.

    This writings on the subject are seperate from his political views. He is a fool because he knows the danger (clear from his writings) and yet he ignores that danger in obama. This clearly makes him a fool.

    Given that the conservatives have combed through every word Rev. Wright published or uttered and found, what one? damning quote, it’s a pretty god bet that most Sundays were not devoted to political cant, but rather “normal” church stuff. Or that he’s not actually that radical after all.

    Oh please, tell me you don’t believe the crap you are writing. By all reports this was a regular thing at that church. You aren’t fooling anyone but yourself.

  63. #163
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:45 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:38 am, BemusedLib said:
    Given that the conservatives have combed through every word Rev. Wright published or uttered and found, what one? damning quote,

    Wrong. There was a lot more than one. If it was just that one, do you think Obama would’ve have thrown him under the bus.

    it’s a pretty god bet that most Sundays were not devoted to political cant, but rather “normal” church stuff. Or that he’s not actually that radical after all.

    I don’t think I want to know what passes for ‘normal’ at that church.

  64. #164
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:47 am, Socky said:

    The lesson of the Jeremiah Wright scandal is that Barry Obama’s judgment is so cloudy he sat in a church for twenty years without realizing the reverend was an America-hating lunatic. The rest of the country figured that out in about five minutes.

  65. #165
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:49 am, BemusedLib said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:41 am, sonofdy said:

    BemusedLib: Okay lets talk issues. Attacks in Iraq are now down over 95% allowing a poltical solution to go forward. This was the plan since 2003. Now Obama and Biden opposed the surge that made this possiable, yet propose to do the same in Afganistan. What do you think it says about the when they oppose a tactic that was proven to work and yet support that same tactic at the same time?

    Entering Iraq in the first place was an expensive strategic blunder. The fact that, after almost six years, we’re finally getting some stability there (as the Afghanistan situation deteriorates) in part because of the surge is no consolation for the fact that the region has been destabilized, our military readiness has been decimated, our allies have lost faith in us, our enemies have been emboldened, Muslims around the world have grown more radical, a trillion dollars has been committed, more than 25,000 Americans have been killed or wounded, and Iraq has been expensively destroyed and emerged as a corrupt autocracy.

    It was the biggest strategic miscalculation of our generation, and McCain was behind it 100%.

    Judgment. Yeah.

  66. #166
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:50 am, travlinman said:

    Gloria Steinem. What a work of art. Gag a maggot!
    I am dating myself, but do remember a quote by her from the early-to-mid seventies, about “women’s vaginas are like their apartments, we should invite our friends to visit them as often as we like” or something to that effect. I recall thinking about what a stupid and slutty remark that was. It pops into my head every time I hear her name. Which is not too often, thank God. That comment alone tells us all we need to know about
    Ms. Steinem.

  67. #167
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:53 am, sonofdy said:

    http://www.tucc.org/talking_points.htm

    To have a church whose theological perspective starts from the vantage point of Black liberation theology being its center, is not to say that African or African American people are superior to any one else.

    From Obamas church.

  68. #168
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:54 am, guitarplayer said:

    This ought to really throw the libs in a panic. Check out the latest Rasmussen poll.

  69. #169
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:56 am, sonofdy said:

    in part because of the surge is no

    The rest were just talking points so I deleted them. In fact the only reason that attacks are down 95% is because of the surge, which your guys said would not work. He was wrong. So Obamas first major political stance in forgien policy as a senator, he got wrong. Not good.

  70. #170
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:59 am, sonofdy said:

    bemusedliberal: so what do you think of obama planning to spend years trying to “get bush” when bush is out of office?

    link here

  71. #171
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:00 am, md1964 said:

    The attack on Sarah Palin about how a woman with 5 kids can be a VP, is not only a Slam on Women/mothers in General, but also on every Responsible Husband and father.

    They act as if a husband/father CAN’T step up and be an active Parent. What bothers liberals is…. she is NOT a VICTIM. Victimization is the sole source for Liberal Power. That is why they spend 100% of their energy in defeating Personal Responsibility.

  72. #172
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:04 am, St. Louis Blue said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:50 am, travlinman said:

    Gloria Steinem. What a work of art. Gag a maggot!
    I am dating myself, but do remember a quote by her from the early-to-mid seventies, about “women’s vaginas are like their apartments, we should invite our friends to visit them as often as we like” or something to that effect. I recall thinking about what a stupid and slutty remark that was.

    Yes it’s slutty, but it makes me laugh. Apparently Gloria’s “apartment” is rent-controlled. The landlord is not taking care of it. The paint is peeling, there are cracks in the walls, the “rug” is thinning, there’s a bad insect infestation and a horrible, horrible odor coming from under the sink.

  73. #173
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:06 am, SpeakEasy said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:35 am, FilmLadd said: …Like a squid, it squirts out a gooey hazy ink and swims away with an ineffective invective about flag lapel pins.

    You reminded me of an appropriate quote from George Orwell:

    “The great enemy of clear language is insincerity. When there is a gap between one’s real and one’s declared aims, one turns to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish spurting out ink.”

    You are in good company my friend.

  74. #174
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:07 am, Socky said:

    The attack on Sarah Palin about how a woman with 5 kids can be a VP, is not only a Slam on Women/mothers in General, but also on every Responsible Husband and father.

    That’s why feminists hate her. She broke the “rules.” She didn’t slut around a la ‘Sex in the City,’ she got married. She didn’t abort, she procreated. She achieved success outside the marxist feminist sisterhood. Worst of all, she’s happy and she has a good man at her side.

    The feminists’ hate is mostly jealousy.

  75. #175
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:11 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:07 am, Socky said:

    The attack on Sarah Palin about how a woman with 5 kids can be a VP, is not only a Slam on Women/mothers in General, but also on every Responsible Husband and father.

    That’s why feminists hate her. She broke the “rules.” She didn’t slut around a la ‘Sex in the City,’ she got married. She didn’t abort, she procreated. She achieved success outside the marxist feminist sisterhood. Worst of all, she’s happy and she has a good man at her side.

    The feminists’ hate is mostly jealousy.

    You hit it right on the head, Socky.

  76. #176
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:15 am, GraniteMan said:

    Every one in the world heard Harry Reid (aka Dirty Harry) say “We lost this war.”

    Who doesn’t quit?

  77. #177
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:16 am, BemusedLib said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:56 am, sonofdy said:

    in part because of the surge is no

    The rest were just talking points so I deleted them. In fact the only reason that attacks are down 95% is because of the surge, which your guys said would not work. He was wrong. So Obamas first major political stance in forgien policy as a senator, he got wrong. Not good.

    Lovely how you delete facts you find inconvenient.

    Even McCain credits the change in tactics dubbed the “Sunni Awakening” with being a major part of the reduction in violence. Of course, Mr. Experience thought that the awakening followed the surge when, in fact, it preceded it. http://geniusofinsanityworld.blogspot.com/2008/07/john-mccain-confused-on-sunni-awakening.html

    The Middle East is a mess. McCain helped make it that way.

  78. #178
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:17 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    They aren’t Democrats.

    They are Democratic Socialist Communists.

    Seriously.

    They will say anything and do anything to gain and keep power.

    We need to ensure that our November elections are carried out honestly. They will do everything in their power to cheat and try to steal the election.

    Does ACORN sound familiar?

    Does Illegal aliens voting in our elections sound familiar?

    Heck, with honest elections, we could even turn Illinois red.

  79. #179
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:19 am, PercyJ said:

    BemusedLib said:

    It was the biggest strategic miscalculation of our generation, and McCain was behind it 100%.

    Judgment. Yeah.

    And so was Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton.

  80. #180
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:19 am, conservativesRus said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:26 am, BemusedLib said:

    Of course we care about issues, that’s why we’re liberals. If we were interested in flag lapel pins and bluster, we’d be on your side.

    Sorry – I just can’t help myself. Exactly what issues is it that you care about? What do you propose we do about said issue? How is your solution going to “fix” said issue? What are the possible “unintended consiquences” of your “solution”? Has your “solution” been tried before? Has that “solution” worked? Is your “solution” part of what made America great or is it something entirely new? If it is entirely new, why do you think it will work?

    Now what issue would you like to talk about?

  81. #181
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:20 am, guitarplayer said:

    The Middle East is a mess. McCain helped make it that way.

    No, that was your friend President Carter. He let Iran turn into an Islamic state and didn’t do squat when they took American’s hostage. It was because of him that terrorists got emboldened.

  82. #182
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:21 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Remember THIS?

  83. #183
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:21 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:16 am, BemusedLib said:

    Explain BO’s flip flop and whitewashing of his website which removed his sterling and masterful analysis of the “failed” war?
    You keep reciting that the war is a mess. Yet, The One and most staunch opponents of the war have changed their tune. You have nothing else to discuss. Sarah has uplifted the base. And.You.Can’t.Handle.It.

    What was that again, FilmLadd? Swim hive-mind, swim!

  84. #184
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:24 am, FamilyMan said:

    BemusedLib said:
    was the biggest strategic miscalculation of our generation

    The entire middle east conflict has always been about the free market price of oil. The cheerleading by the politicians is necessary in order to galvanize support. It is true we are there for oil and to open up new markets. The history of United States uses conflict to spread it’s influence but as a wonderful result we bring them freedom.
    Example: General MacArthur insisting on women voting rights in the new constitution of the defeated Japan. ETC ETC

  85. #185
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:24 am, travlinman said:

    From the Rasmussen poll: 55% said media bias is a bigger problem for the electoral process than large campaign donations.

    Maybe it is time to introduce media reform legislation! Almost very other amendment in the Constitution has been reviewed and scrutinized for its relevence in a modern world by the ‘fair-minded and unbiased’ media, and several of our fundamental rights have come under attack. Why not ‘freedom of the press’? Maybe it is time to take this ‘sacred cow’ to task.

  86. #186
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:24 am, PercyJ said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:17 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    They are Democratic Socialist Communists.

    Seriously.

    They will say anything and do anything to gain and keep power.

    I can’t believe this hasn’t hit the MSM /sarc

    Apparently Joe doesn’t realize that the Steelers didn’t win a SuperBowl until 1974.

  87. #187
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:25 am, sonofdy said:

    Lovely how you delete facts you find inconvenient.

    I deleted talking points not facts. You really should try to see the difference.

    Even McCain credits the change in tactics dubbed the “Sunni Awakening” with being a major part of the reduction in violence. Of course, Mr. Experience thought that the awakening followed the surge when, in fact, it preceded it.

    The awakeing was part of the surge stratagy. The surge was far more than just pumping more troops into the area. It was also a major change in strategy and tactics on the ground. Both of which worked, both of which Obama opposed.

  88. #188
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:28 am, sonofdy said:

    Now lets talk about the idea of a windfall tax on the oil companies. Do you think that the oil companies will just:
    A: Pay up and let it go?

    or

    B: Pay up and pass the bill on as higher gas prices?

    or

    C: Something else?

    Don’t get me wrong, I will spend the money. But I am talking about the consequences.

  89. #189
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:29 am, Goldwater Knight said:

    Yes, if Obama is elected this country will be marginalized. It will be a sad day for America if Obama is elected. There will be no hope.

  90. #190
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:30 am, BemusedLib said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:28 am, sonofdy said:
    Now lets talk about the idea of a windfall tax on the oil companies. Do you think that the oil companies will just:

    I think the windfall tax is BS. Of course, Palin supports it. Or has she flip-flopped on that already?

  91. #191
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:32 am, BemusedLib said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:25 am, sonofdy said:

    The awakeing was part of the surge stratagy. The surge was far more than just pumping more troops into the area. It was also a major change in strategy and tactics on the ground. Both of which worked, both of which Obama opposed.

    You’re simply wrong on this. The awakening preceded the announcement of the surge by many months. You not only delete facts, you make them up.

  92. #192
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:33 am, sonofdy said:

    I think the windfall tax is BS. Of course, Palin supports it. Or has she flip-flopped on that already?

    Palin isn’t running for president, Obama is.So you oppose Obamas windfall tax idea. Good. Now what do you think of the fairness doctrine?

  93. #193
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:38 am, sonofdy said:
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:25 am, sonofdy said:

    The awakeing was part of the surge stratagy. The surge was far more than just pumping more troops into the area. It was also a major change in strategy and tactics on the ground. Both of which worked, both of which Obama opposed.

    You’re simply wrong on this. The awakening preceded the announcement of the surge by many months. You not only delete facts, you make them up.

    I am not making anything up. Man you should read more outside of lefty blogs. Repeating the sunni awakeing in other areas was part of the surge strategy. :roll:

  94. #194
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:38 am, conservativesRus said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:49 am, BemusedLib said:
    Entering Iraq in the first place was an expensive strategic blunder. The fact that, after almost six years, we’re finally getting some stability there (as the Afghanistan situation deteriorates) in part because of the surge is no consolation for the fact that the region has been destabilized, our military readiness has been decimated, our allies have lost faith in us, our enemies have been emboldened, Muslims around the world have grown more radical, a trillion dollars has been committed, more than 25,000 Americans have been killed or wounded, and Iraq has been expensively destroyed and emerged as a corrupt autocracy.

    It was the biggest strategic miscalculation of our generation, and McCain was behind it 100%.

    Bemused: You know all of this how? Katie Couric told you or you’ve spoken to the troops? Have you personally witnessed any of the situation on the ground in either country or are you just parroting what the media tells you? Since you don’t like the situation as you know it, what is your proposed solution from here? Please think this through COMPLETELY. There may be many ramifications to any and all actions.

    Please also understand the thinking by a certain group of people. You are an infidel, you deserve to die. They get bonus points for helping you die early.

  95. #195
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:39 am, Storm Chaser said:

    Its all about fear. They see in Palin what a Public Television commentator called a new Republican folk hero. In less than a week McCain in choosing Palin has shattered their world, and they still don’t know what to do.

  96. #196
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:41 am, sonofdy said:

    conservativerus, Thats why I deleted the talking points. Everyone knows them and they do nothing to move the debate forward. There was only one sentence that seemed to be bemuseds own thoughts.

  97. #197
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:41 am, JT said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:33 am, FamilyMan said:

    By Gloria Steinem
    September 4, 2008
    Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Clinton.

    Really Gloria. Here’s what Clinton supporters are really thinking about Palin. These are Democrats loving Palin, especially when she trashes Obama.

    PUMA’s

    Hillary Supporters for McCain

    More Hillary Supporters for McCain

    I thought I was reading commennts from conservative websites for a minute. But these are DEMOCRATS!!! I think Obama better start worrying about the Hillary voters. Imagine all those that don’t blog or comment on blogs.

  98. #198
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:43 am, Socky said:

    You’re simply wrong on this. The awakening preceded the announcement of the surge by many months. You not only delete facts, you make them up.

    First rule of the left, never give credit to our troops. Don’t credit American troops for the success of the Surge because, after all, they’re just dumb hick losers who didn’t study hard enough and got “stuck in Iraq.” How could they possibly make a difference?

  99. #199
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:46 am, conservativesRus said:

    sonfdy – I quoted it all because every once in a while, a lib talking point is in fact truth. I was just questioning how Bemused knew any of it to be fact.

  100. #200
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:47 am, FilmLadd said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:49 am, BemusedLib said:

    Entering Iraq in the first place was an expensive strategic blunder. The fact that, after almost six years, we’re finally getting some stability there (as the Afghanistan situation deteriorates) in part because of the surge is no consolation for the fact that the region has been destabilized, our military readiness has been decimated, our allies have lost faith in us, our enemies have been emboldened, Muslims around the world have grown more radical, a trillion dollars has been committed, more than 25,000 Americans have been killed or wounded, and Iraq has been expensively destroyed and emerged as a corrupt autocracy.

    Note that hive-mind does not mention what the goal was that the strategic blunder was committed for. Hive-mind does not want you to think about this.

    It acts as if stability is important to it, that U.S. military readiness is important to it, that our enemies being emboldened is not desired by it, that 25,000 Americans dead or wounded is undesirable to it, or that a corrupt autocracy in Iraq is a bad thing to its ultimate goals.

    Hive mind, we know you delight in these things. This is why your drones so easily rattle off these half-thoughts.

    Ah, but hive mind will not respond. Nevertheless I will still address it, as naming it and speaking to it directly causes it great damage.

    Prattle on, hive mind, prattle on!

You must be logged in to post a comment.


More CPAC speeches in 20 words

February 11, 2012 06:53 PM by Michelle Malkin

72 Comments

Palin: If I Lived in South Carolina, I’d Vote for Newt

January 17, 2012 10:28 PM by Doug Powers

127 Comments

Endorsement?

‘Game Change’ Trailer

December 22, 2011 04:38 PM by Doug Powers

77 Comments

Brace for “from my house” reference

New Ad Airing in Iowa: Run, Sarah, Run

November 29, 2011 09:47 AM by Doug Powers

94 Comments

Too late?

Sarah Palin is out of 2012 race

October 5, 2011 06:26 PM by Michelle Malkin

107 Comments

Poll: Palin Picks Up Steam Against Obama

September 20, 2011 10:48 PM by Doug Powers

154 Comments

Sarah Palin’s Bus Tour Re-Launching in Iowa Thursday

August 11, 2011 12:01 AM by Doug Powers

342 Comments

Next stop, an announcement?


Categories: Sarah Palin

Babalu Blog

» Greece is Burning
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook