About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Obama on Fox: Weigh in

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 4, 2008 12:03 PM

A lot of readers are upset about the decision by Fox News to put Barack Obama on the airwaves on the night of John McCain’s convention speech.

I wouldn’t get too worked up about it. I doubt much of consequence will come of the appearance. Obama has continually failed to follow rule number one of politics: Manage expectations. It’s all hype, followed by fizzle, followed by excuses, blame, and whining for his own failure to deliver.

Why would tonight be any different for Obama? Right?

***

Another thought: Obama says he’ll meet with the tyrants of the world without preconditions.

Wonder if he has the same policy with American cable networks?

Posted in: Barack Obama

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Obama Campaign Grasping at Straws | The Hinge Of Fate
  2. Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator
  3. Fox News - Bill O’Reilly Interviews Barack Obama - Part 1 : BigMouthFrog

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

  1. #101
    On September 4th, 2008 at 1:56 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Couric, like most all of the elitist media, thinks ‘AK’ is the 2-ltr abbrev for ‘Arkansas’ v ALASKA.

    Anything outside Manhattan is confusing, now where did I put my latte while I was doing the pike.

  2. #102
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:01 pm, deedledee said:

    I have a feeling there are some pre-conditions. Last night Dennis Miller was asking Bill to clarify certain things and the way he looked made me wonder. He of course always like to come off as fair and balanced on certain issues…I get the idea he likes the approval of his MSN peers in certain areas.

  3. #103
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:02 pm, Dan Lee said:

    Bill O’Reilly isn’t usually too softball with people. I mean it seems like that would ruin his show. Maybe I’m wrong, I mean I don’t watch him EVERY night, but when I maybe a few times a week, he seems to challenge ANYONE on issues.

    I guess we’ll just have to see, but my guess is that Obama will be in the hot seat to some degree. Sarah Palin upped the stakes a bit by talking Energy Policy (no matter what the press claims, she did talk issues). I don’t think Obama can stay in his marshmallow world anymore. He’s going to have to answer at least a few tough questions.

  4. #104
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:05 pm, DerKrieger said:

    I can’t stand O’Reilley. I’m not sure what he is but he’s no Conservative. I can’t stand H&C b/c of Colmes. Fox needs some new shows.

  5. #105
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:06 pm, HappyGene said:

    Worst case might be the best case. If Obama vs O’Reilly turns into a titanic strugle of good vs evil people will watch and talk about it. Loons will have more ammo that Fox is in the tank for McCain. If O’Reilly pitches some softball questions and Obama response is: “Um ahh um Sarah Palin um distorted my record.” Show is over. All O’Reilly needs to do is ask easy questions outside of the prepared talking points. No news, no distraction.

  6. #106
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:07 pm, madchef said:

    If I was the head of the RNC I would tell O’Reilly to feel free to interview Obama, but find somewhere else to do it. The RNC is renting the Xcel Energy Center, so if you want to interview him you pay for your own place!

    I would suggest outside with the other loons.

  7. #107
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:08 pm, rightisright said:

    The BOR is in the bag for The ‘0′…hear him try and equivocate 8 yrs as a state rep. voting present except for the bill that would allow killing the baby after a botched abortion to running a business or a city and it’s budget? He’s never run a lemonade stand never mind a budget for a city of any size or the budget for the largest state in regards to natural resources. Besides the BOR is a softball pitcher..talks a good story but that’s it, all BS. I’ll not be watching O’Reilly and his chum The ‘0′.

  8. #108
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:08 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    Couric, like most all of the elitist media, thinks ‘AK’ is the 2-ltr abbrev for ‘Arkansas’ v ALASKA.

    So many letters…. so little time

    Even just a few years ago, I stil had customers in the North East that thought Indians (Native Americans) still ran wild west of the Mississippi River.

    And “No”, not all Texans wear cowboys hats and own horses.

  9. #109
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:11 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:08 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:
    And “No”, not all Texans wear cowboys hats and own horses.

    You should see the looks I get from Manhattanites when I tell them that even though I’m a New Yorker I wear plaid flannel shirts and swing a pretty mean chainsaw.

  10. #110
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:12 pm, bloodhound said:

    For the past few months, O’Reilly has been going through all sorts of wild unnatural gyrations to demonstrate his unbiased (read: non-conservative) bona fides. In light of the machinations - high level talks with top FNC management - required to get Barry on the network, expect a lot of big, fat slow pitches over the plate with little follow-up. Sure, Bill will throw a couple tough questions and possibly follow-ups in there for the target demographic, but don’t expect him to really pin Barry down on anything. It will be like trying to nail Jello to the wall.

  11. #111
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:13 pm, FilmLadd said:

    RabbidSquirrel said:

    Even just a few years ago, I stil had customers in the North East that thought Indians (Native Americans) still ran wild west of the Mississippi River.

    They also think that everyone in the south has missing teeth, spits chewing tobacco, wears overalls, plays banjos, and goes out Saturday night for a rousing cow-tipping or cross burning.

  12. #112
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:15 pm, radio relay said:

    If I was the head of the RNC I would tell O’Reilly to feel free to interview Obama, but find somewhere else to do it.

    Actually, O’Reilly is going to interview Obama in New York.

    I definitely think it’s going to be a softball interview. His reaction to Dennis Miller last night pretty much confirmed it. Dennis was suggesting some hard hitting questions, and O’Reilly pretty much said he couldn’t ask that.

    If it’s anything like his interviews with Michael Moore, at the DNC four years ago, don’t waist your time watching. That was pathetic!!

  13. #113
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:17 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:12 pm, bloodhound said:
    For the past few months, O’Reilly has been going through all sorts of wild unnatural gyrations to demonstrate his unbiased (read: non-conservative) bona fides.

    I’m glad I’m not the only one who felt that way. He has been pathetic in his pandering to Obama.

  14. #114
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:20 pm, Ron Rockstar said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:13 pm, FilmLadd said:…..They also think that everyone in the south has missing teeth, spits chewing tobacco, wears overalls, plays banjos, and goes out Saturday night for a rousing cow-tipping or cross burning.

    Yeah, they don’t know jack do they. We go bass fishing.

  15. #115
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:23 pm, noTnoP said:

    I’d bet a dollar to a doughnut you won’t see anything in the O’Reilly interview that you wouldn’t get from the MSM.

    So, Billy boy, why bother?

  16. #116
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:24 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    and goes out Saturday night for a rousing cow-tipping

    Ummm, they may actually be on to something there…

  17. #117
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:29 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:23 pm, noTnoP said:
    So, Billy boy, why bother?

    I think that for all of BO’s tough talk about being proud of his status as an outcast among journalists and celebrities, he secretly wishes he was accepted by the people who oppose him the most. He is enamored with the elite leftists and he wants to get in the club.

    I would like to see that worthless “Body Language” woman analyze him after the interview. Too bad we already know that genuflection doesn’t indicate objectivity.

    Does Obama have a fat ring O’Reilly can kiss?

  18. #118
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:31 pm, John Deaux said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:13 pm, FilmLadd said:
    RabbidSquirrel said:

    Even just a few years ago, I stil had customers in the North East that thought Indians (Native Americans) still ran wild west of the Mississippi River.
    They also think that everyone in the south has missing teeth, spits chewing tobacco, wears overalls, plays banjos, and goes out Saturday night for a rousing cow-tipping or cross burning.

    Cow Tipping. Now, that’s some good wholesome fun for everyone. Except for the cow.

  19. #119
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:37 pm, Flyover State said:

    I’m expecting a softball interview. He has changed over the years, he’s less scrappy and more concerned with image.

    The old Bill O’Reilly would have seen through the ploy of an interview request for tonight, and scheduled it for another time. This one is just brags about getting the interview, like there’s no coincidence there whatsoever.

  20. #120
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:39 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Cow Tipping. Now, that’s some good wholesome fun for everyone. Except for the cow.

    So that’s how you make a milkshake…

  21. #121
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:40 pm, Big V said:

    I am hoping that Bill gives him a tough interview and won’t let him wimp out in his responses.

    I can’t remember who was being interviewed last night on FOX but he kept saying… ‘Even your viewers could figure that out’ or “even your viewers can see xxxxxx” I was hoping some one was gonna pop him.

  22. #122
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:43 pm, John Deaux said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:37 pm, Flyover State said:
    I’m expecting a softball interview. He has changed over the years, he’s less scrappy and more concerned with image.

    The old Bill O’Reilly would have seen through the ploy of an interview request for tonight, and scheduled it for another time. This one is just brags about getting the interview, like there’s no coincidence there whatsoever.

    He mentioned on his radio show that the Obama camp told him it was to detract from the RNC and he did it anyway. His reason was that he has to look at which is a bigger story. How can he call himself objective if he turns down an interview with the guy he’s been saying won’t come on the show.

    Realistically, McCain knows this and nothing of great significance will happen until 9:00.

    Don’t expect O’Reilly to try to pin Obama to the wall, he’ll be about the same as he was with Hillary and Kerry. I’m just waiting to see how many Uh’s and Um’s BO says. As noted many times before, he isn’t too eloquent off the cuff, so this should be interesting.

  23. #123
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:43 pm, sandyb said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 12:24 pm, b-cat said:
    Let Megyn Kendall do the interview.

    Speaking of pitbulls, she IS ferocious! And stunning to boot. She has a Major League future. She seems to be a strong conservative and knows her stuff. She should enter politics; she could give as well as she gets. I won’t even hold it against her that she’s a lawyer.

  24. #124
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:43 pm, mirak said:

    Well, we know there was at least one precondition: Bill must air at least a portion of the interview tonight.

    We need to temper our expectations. Bill talks a big game, but he’ll go easy on Obama, just like he did with Hillary. Part of that is simply being respectful to a presidential candidate (I agree), but Bill also wants to encourage the big names to come on his show, and he doesn’t do this by antagonizing them.

    Expect the first few minutes to be smiley Bill joking about how “we didn’t think we’d ever get to talk to you”, etc. Bill will ask simple, pointed questions. Obama will answer some and dodge others. There will be little, if any, follow up. This will not be a debate. Bill will leave it to the viewers to decide who is right, and whether Obama answers the questions.

    Unless Obama dodges everything, or makes a major gaffe, this should be a win for him. He gets to say he took on Bill O’Reilly, but Bill is hardly the interrogator he makes himself out to be when it comes to big names.

  25. #125
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:45 pm, radio relay said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:23 pm, noTnoP said:

    I’d bet a dollar to a doughnut you won’t see anything in the O’Reilly interview that you wouldn’t get from the MSM.

    So, Billy boy, why bother?

    O’Reilly is just looking for a feather for his cap, a shine on his ego, and validation from his “friends” at places like ABC, where he used to work.

    He has no intention whatsoever of being hard on Obama. I’m not going to watch the interview. It will be a waste of time!

    Oh, and he thinks we’re “right wing” kooks!

  26. #126
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:48 pm, sandyb said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:07 pm, madchef said:
    If I was the head of the RNC I would tell O’Reilly to feel free to interview Obama, but find somewhere else to do it. The RNC is renting the Xcel Energy Center, so if you want to interview him you pay for your own place!

    I would suggest outside with the other loons.

    Ted Baxter (BOR) said he was leaving the convention last night to fly out and interview the Agitator. If I were B-O, I wouldn’t want to go anywhere near thousands of fired-up conservatives and esp. not near Sarah’cuda. I’d be scared if I were him, being a manchild and all.

    BTW, are you the same MadChef that posts those great recipees at RecipeZaar?

  27. #127
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:48 pm, NavyMom said:

    What bugs me about this is the fact that the Messiah has chosen TONIGHT, of all nights, prior to Senator McCain’s night in the spotlight to deign to acquiesce to the interview. He’s desperate to be back under the kleig lights onstage in a pathetic attempt to blunt the impact of McCain’s moment in the sun. Obama is an insecure little man.

  28. #128
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:49 pm, John Ansell said:

    By land, sea, and now air. I wonder if Bill has the guts to ask him about the illegal invaders.

  29. #129
    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:53 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:49 pm, John Ansell said:
    By land, sea, and now air. I wonder if Bill has the guts to ask him about the illegal invaders.

    Not to be a buzzkill, but we have to keep on McCain about his pandering to groups who support this illegal activity.

  30. #130
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:00 pm, BobonStatenIsland said:

    O’Rielly has been doing everything he can to get this interview. Meaning, he has not persued any stories of late (like the last four months or more)that would offend the Messiah. Tonight’s “interview” will be a total wash. O’Reilly is not much of a journalist and a poor interviewer at best. I expext him to be wiping the brown stuff off his nose by the end of the chit chat. I’ll wait for Rush to summarize for me tomorrow during his show (if he even bothers).

  31. #131
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:00 pm, cblesz said:

    O’Reilly will softball Obama. He will be soft on him to show he is “fair” and he wants to have access to him.

  32. #132
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:00 pm, rightisright said:

    The BOR is no different than the Sunday morning left wing mouth pieces doing interviews…he’s no harder in an interview than the world’s best softball pitcher Larry King. The BOR is more talk than show anymore as stated above. He’s comfy in his position and not about to create waves.

  33. #133
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:03 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    I expext him to be wiping the brown stuff off his nose by the end of the chit chat.

    Actually, the Obama campaign had a fresh bag of brown stuff waiting for O’Reilly at the airport so he could get a head start on the flight to NYC.

  34. #134
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:04 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    What bugs me about this is the fact that the Messiah has chosen TONIGHT, of all nights, prior to Senator McCain’s night in the spotlight to deign to acquiesce to the interview. He’s desperate to be back under the kleig lights onstage in a pathetic attempt to blunt the impact of McCain’s moment in the sun. Obama is an insecure little man.

    This has been bothering me all morning. I just don’t know why Bill O gets sucked into this agreement knowing full well what the Obama campaign is up to! Was he forced to air this or else? Did he ask Obama if he could do the interview tonight and show it later? Or was it a quid pro quo…tonight or else?

  35. #135
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:05 pm, Little Ma said:

    What? Bill O’Reilly is still on tv?

  36. #136
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:07 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    I just don’t know why Bill O gets sucked into this agreement knowing full well what the Obama campaign is up to!

    Insecurity and a desire to “belong”.

  37. #137
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:08 pm, mdclayton said:

    I’ve lost the last bit of respect that I had for O’Riley after playing into the Dem’s hands, and delivering just the spin that they want. No Spin Zone? Riiight.

    O’Riley is just not very smart, but his appeal had been that he was (WAS) one of the few non-liberal voices on TV. Now he bends over backwards to look “fair and balanced”, thinking that if he panders to the left a little that they will accept him. That’s a stupid premise that will never work.

    I now turn on O’Riley mainly to see if Michelle or Laura Ingraham is on.

  38. #138
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:11 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    O’Riley is just not very smart

    No, he really isn’t, even though he tries to brag about his Harvard Kennedy School of Government degree every chance he gets. And I like it when he tries to become a lawyer on his show. Know it all pompous a…

    The only time I do watch it is when Laura is on. If at all…anymore.

  39. #139
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:18 pm, travlinman said:

    I have let Fox News and Bill O’Reilly know exactly how I feel. McCain and the GOP deserve the same respect as they gave the Dems last week. Bill is only doing this for ratings, not for us. We already know Barack Obama.

    Why not interview Sarah Palin? She is the one (did I call her the “one” ooohhh, I just felt a chill run down my leg…) who everyone in the media seems to not understand.

    BTW, did you guys see her audience share for last night. She darn near matched the “Messiah” in ratings. Without all of the massive build-up and no Greek columns!

    Be afraid Democraps, be very afraid. That ‘bump in the night’ may well be a pitbull without its’ lipstick!!!

  40. #140
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:21 pm, Wildcatter1980 said:

    I don’t blame Fox for agreeing with having Obama on today. When any major party nominee for POTUS says he will come in for an interview, most news organizations will be “amenable” to the nominee’s schedule even if it is fairly transparent he is trying to subvert his opponent’s potential convention bounce. In BO’s eyes, it is turnabout fair play for the Palin announcement.

  41. #141
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:25 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    In BO’s eyes, it is turnabout fair play for the Palin announcement.

    He’s a day late and a dollar short. He should have gone on yesterday if he wanted to do some damage control.

  42. #142
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:25 pm, travlinman said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:21 pm, Wildcatter1980 said:

    By what logic? Turnabout would be to hold the interview for tomorrow.

  43. #143
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:27 pm, John Deaux said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:53 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 2:49 pm, John Ansell said:
    By land, sea, and now air. I wonder if Bill has the guts to ask him about the illegal invaders.

    Not to be a buzzkill, but we have to keep on McCain about his pandering to groups who support this illegal activity.

    Even if Bill asked about the invaders, the answer would be “treate humanely…compassion…beacon of hope…American Dream” that doesn’t answer anything. This will be a lot of talk and then when it’s over, you’ll realize that he didn’t actually say anything about what he wants to do and how he’ll get it done.

    McCain has the ability and we need to keep his feet to the fire. He needs to emphasize the difference between hispanic and illegal alien and take a stand against the latter to gain support of the former along with the rest of us.

  44. #144
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:44 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Personally, I can’t even stand to watch Bill O’Reilly. He’s a philandering, egotistical boob! What surprises me is most of his guest are light years more intellegent than he. I would love to hear their responses to his questions but that’s not what you get with him. He asks and answers…I just don’t have a lick of respect for the man.

  45. #145
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:44 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    He’s a day late and a dollar short. He should have gone on yesterday if he wanted to do some damage control.

    Oh no, they [the Obama camp] were so arrogant, they thought Palin would fall flat on her face. And she didn’t.

  46. #146
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:50 pm, gandolphxx said:

    Why watch either BOR(e) or the One - they will just slobber over each other - disgusting to contemplate.

    BORe is all about him sort of like a Marxist community organizer that we know.

  47. #147
    On September 4th, 2008 at 3:59 pm, freeus said:

    This just goes to show every time we “reach across the aisle” we get “B” slapped by someone. McCain did not release his VP pick on Thursday as rumored and he sent a very polite message congratulating THE ONE on his accomplishment.

    Did Bill not know this or get the memo that most of the time the night of the acceptance speech most candidates with class would not opt to do something like this? I thought he was for no spin and being “fair and balanced”? Dittos to cblesz #131!

    THE ONE may be gaffetastic and may not be able to answer a question without it either a) being above his paygrade or b) 97,000 uhs, ers, or uhmmmms, but this is beyond “fair and balanced” and I think it could do some damage. People all over the place are very ticked about this.

    Here is a new word for ya Bill- mendacity! LOOK IT UP!

  48. #148
    On September 4th, 2008 at 4:10 pm, TanyaB said:

    I don’t understand the thinking of O’Reilly. Fox news keeps saying that this is McCain’s night. Why can’t O’Reilly put this interview on next week. He’s just showing half of it tonight, and the other half next week anyway.

    Just saw on Fox that the convention last night was viewed by 37 million people, just short of the DNC convention.Be afraid Obama, be very afraid!!

  49. #149
    On September 4th, 2008 at 4:48 pm, sxs537 said:

    I am more concerned about the Giants-Redskins game overlapping with Mc Cain’s speech than O’Reillys interview of Obama. The game starts at 7ET and can go on till 11ET. Mc Cain’s speech is at 10ET. If the game is competitive then Mc Cain will lose a lot of TV audience (My guess). What do you guys think? Shoul Mc Cain delay his speech?

  50. #150
    On September 4th, 2008 at 4:52 pm, bloodhound said:

    Obviously, this stunt by Barry wreaks of desperation. O’Reilly has been chasing him for months asking for specifics about his plans for the country, and Barry’s been doing the ole Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive & Dodge routine avoiding FNC and O’Rielly. Now, only because he’s being burried by McPalin and the incredible momentum Sarah brought to the campaign, he’s going to thumb his nose at MoveOn and all the other left-wing wacknuts who have been urging an FNC boycott and crawl to O’Rielly in a vain attempt at recapturing some relevance.

    Face it Barry, like a sprinter running a marathon, you burned bright, but burned out too early. The weight of your gaffs, lies, half-truths, and mis-steps has dragged you down. You’re on your back on the mat, looking at the glare of the lights on the ceiling wondering what happened.

    O’Reilly did a good job with Hillary (IMHO), but I’m afraid that the circumstances surrounding this interview, the deal-making and desperation on both sides required FNC to surrender something to get the interview. Result: O’Rielly will have benn rendered impotent. I’m not expecting much, though I’m hopeful for some tough questions to pin Barry down. Then again, I think I’d be happier if he just continues evading straight answers to direct questions while stuttering and stammering like usual! ; )

  51. #151
    On September 4th, 2008 at 4:57 pm, Ron said:

    I don’t mind his being interviewed, I might mind when they air it. I’m sure it won’t be live, right?

  52. #152
    On September 4th, 2008 at 4:59 pm, Mercy4Me said:

    It will be a fluff fest.

  53. #153
    On September 4th, 2008 at 5:01 pm, Mercy4Me said:

    hey, anyone? can obama’s camp still raise money? drudge says that he has raised 8 million since the next VP’s speech last night. Is it only the rep. that can’t?

  54. #154
    On September 4th, 2008 at 5:03 pm, Mercy4Me said:

    i thought that you could only contrib. to the national committee’s now?

  55. #155
    On September 4th, 2008 at 5:09 pm, TexasEngineer said:

    Maybe BO’R will find a bag of wrenches to fling at (ala)Obama? If you can dodge a wrench…uh, um, er…oh..wait

    [spastic coughing fit]

  56. #156
    On September 4th, 2008 at 5:12 pm, TexasEngineer said:

    On September 4th, 2008 at 5:03 pm, Mercy4Me said:
    i thought that you could only contrib. to the national committee’s now?

    I do believe that the candidate who opted for public money is now cut off…and the candidate who promised to take public money and then changed his..um, er, hmmm…uh…mind about it can still take the filthy luchre.

  57. #157
    On September 4th, 2008 at 5:23 pm, freeus said:

    After thinking about this some more, Rush’s term “manchild” comes to mind. The Manchild’s interview after the BOR interview was equal to a temper tantrum.

    Yes, I am concerned about the football game overlapping. I plan on wearing out my “previous” button. I need DVR! GO GIANTS! And thank the dear Lord football is back. Life is complete!

  58. #158
    On September 4th, 2008 at 5:27 pm, bloodhound said:

    And thank the dear Lord football is back. Life is complete!

    Freeus ~ I couldn’t agree more about football! Once again, September is here and all seems right with the universe! ; )

  59. #159
    On September 4th, 2008 at 5:31 pm, TexasEngineer said:

    Oh…and cow-tipping…15% is standard but for really good service…the sky is the limit

  60. #160
    On September 4th, 2008 at 5:33 pm, Mercy4Me said:

    Thats right, my bag, i forgot.

  61. #161
    On September 4th, 2008 at 5:48 pm, 7thson said:

    Obama has admitted to O’Reilly that the surge has worked.

    http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/04/obama-surge-succeeded-beyond-wildest-dreams/

    I haven’t seen the interview but I am sure he will take credit for victory.

  62. #162
    On September 4th, 2008 at 6:14 pm, astonerii said:

    Look the questions we need asked are as follows.
    When did you first meet Ayers?
    What is your real relationship with Ayers?

    Sorry, but that for me is what we want a solid this is the facts answer to, so we can verify the varacity.

  63. #163
    On September 4th, 2008 at 6:20 pm, xblade said:

    His reason was that he has to look at which is a bigger story. How can he call himself objective if he turns down an interview with the guy he’s been saying won’t come on the show

    By telling people that he only wants to come on now because he wants to steal McCain’s thunder, and said he will only come on if they show it on McCain’s night. No one(rational people) would question his objectivity if he refused under those circumstances.

    Being objective doesn’t mean you can’t do the right thing. A man of character would have said “no thanks”. Instead, Bill has proven he is just as sleazy as the MSM he pretends to despise.

  64. #164
    On September 4th, 2008 at 6:26 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    That’s right xblade. I question the timing of all this. Bill O has become the typical media ho.

  65. #165
    On September 4th, 2008 at 6:35 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    I don’t watch or listen to Bill O’Reilly. In fact, I rarely listen to any talk radio, and when I do it’s Sean Hannity or Laura Ingraham while I drive my truck. Since I ride my motorscooter most places, that’s not a lot of talk radio.

    I’ve heard everything Obama has to say, anyway. It’s the same old thing the left has been saying since I turned eighteen 38 years ago. He may say it better than others in front of a teleprompter, but that doesn’t make it smart.

    ECS

    http://theturkeyfootbrand.blogspot.com/

  66. #166
    On September 4th, 2008 at 6:52 pm, Jamfish said:

    According to this story [OBAMA: SURGE SUCCEEDED BEYOND ‘WILDEST DREAMS’ - LOL!], the interview will be played in 3 parts next week on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday.

  67. #167
    On September 4th, 2008 at 7:12 pm, almeehan said:

    Bill said “I’m possibly just being used as a pawn, time will tell.”

    OReilly is a stooge and tool for Obama. He undercuts Palin today on the factor and tried, in my view, to paint her as an empty suit, “because he doesn’t know her!” OReilly seems to judge, if he hasn’t talked to them and interviewed them on “his” show, they are not vetted for public worth. I used to enjoy him for the most part but after the Geraldo thing and his soft on OBama bent–He is a pompous butt.

  68. #168
    On September 4th, 2008 at 7:12 pm, atheling said:

    Obama’s Ties to Islam from Newsmax:

    New evidence has emerged that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was closely associated as early as age 25 to a key adviser to a Saudi billionaire who had mentored the founding members of the Black Panthers.

    In a videotaped interview this year on New York’s all news cable channel NY1, a prominent African-American businessman and political figure made the curious disclosures about Obama.

    Percy Sutton, the former borough president of Manhattan, off-handedly revealed the unusual circumstances about his first encounter with the young Obama.

    “I was introduced to (Obama) by a friend who was raising money for him,” Sutton told NY1 city hall reporter Dominic Carter.

    “The friend’s name is Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, from Texas,” Sutton said. “He is the principal adviser to one of the world’s richest men. He told me about Obama.”

    Sutton, the founder of Inner City Broadcasting, said al-Mansour contacted him to ask a favor: Would Sutton write a letter in support of Obama’s application to Harvard Law School?

    “He wrote to me about him,” Sutton recalled. “And his introduction was there is a young man that has applied to Harvard. I know that you have a few friends up there because you used to go up there to speak. Would you please write a letter in support of him?”

    Sutton said he acted on his friend al-Mansour’s advice.

    “I wrote a letter of support of him to my friends at Harvard, saying to them I thought there was a genius that was going to be available and I certainly hoped they would treat him kindly,” Sutton told NY1.

    Sutton did not say why al-Mansour was helping Obama, how he discovered him, or from whom he was raising money on Obama’s behalf.

    Although many Americans have never heard of Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour (his full name), he is well known within the black community as a lawyer, an orthodox Muslim, a black nationalist, an author, an international deal-maker, an educator, and an outspoken enemy of Israel.

    But his writings and books are packed with anti-American rhetoric reminiscent of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s disgraced former pastor.

    In a 1995 book, “The Lost Books of Africa Rediscovered,” he alleged that the United States was plotting genocide against black Americans.

    But al-Mansour’s sponsorship of Obama as a prospective Harvard law student is important for another reason beyond his Islamic and anti-American rhetoric and early Black Panther ties.

    At the time Percy Sutton, a former lawyer for Malcolm X and a former business partner of al-Mansour, says he was raising money for Obama’s graduate school education, al-Mansour was representing top members of the Saudi Royal family seeking to do business and exert influence in the United States.

    But in the lengthy interview, al-Mansour confirmed that he frequently spoke on university campuses, including Columbia, where Percy Sutton suggested he met Obama in the late 1980s, and confirmed his close relationship with Prince Alwaleed.

    “To me, this opened up more questions about Barack Obama and his relationship to the Muslim world,” Peterson told Newsmax.

  69. #169
    On September 4th, 2008 at 7:14 pm, K2 said:

    From O’Reilly’s prior interviews with Hillary and McCain, it will be more of a softball interview. As he puts it, he is being respectful!

    So, I suspect, there will be very little follow up to Obama’s answers.

    And, I really do think it is showing weakness (or fear) on Obama’s part to schedule the interview on McCain’s night……..

  70. #170
    On September 4th, 2008 at 7:19 pm, skysoljr82 said:

    This was sent to me as an email that was circulating amongst some friends. I found it to be somewhat humorous…:) Airplane Conversation

    Barack Obama is sitting next to a little girl on an airplane. He turns to her and says, ‘Let’s talk. I’ve heard that flights go quicker if you strike up a conversation with your fellow passenger.’ The little girl, who had just opened her book, closed it slowly and said to the Obama, ‘What would you like to talk about?’ ‘Oh, I don’t know,’ said the Obama. ‘How about What Changes I Should Make To America? and he smiles.
    ‘OK, ‘ she said. ‘That could be an interesting topic. But let me ask you a question first. A horse, a cow,and a deer all eat the same stuff - grass - . Yet a deer excretes little pellets, while a cow turns out a flat patty,
    and a horse produces clumps of dried grass. Why do you> suppose that is?’
    Obama, visibly surprised by the little girl’s intelligence, thinks about it and says, ‘Hmmm, I have no idea.’ To which the little girl replies, ‘Do you really feel qualified to change America when you don’t know s**t?

  71. #171
    On September 4th, 2008 at 7:49 pm, ScottyDog said:

    BOR has been attacking Palin for the last three days it is as if he was hired by the Hussein committee for president.

    From listening to his latest commentary he is clearly in the Obama camp just like he was for John Kerry when he continually attacked the Swift Boat Veterans.

    BOR will never admit it but he has white guilt syndrome just like the rest of the liberal media.

    Bank on a Softball Interview.

  72. #172
    On September 4th, 2008 at 7:52 pm, joeblough said:

    .
    I won’t be watching.

    I like O’Reilly well enough, but the sight of B. Hussein turns my stomach.

    The fact that that dried out, hollow, anti-American cheese ball achieved the candidacy is nothing more than a lamentable symptom of America’s present cultural weakness.

    It will take another generation or two before the country recovers.

    I, for one, am not moved by Snowbama’s alleged eloquence. I am infuriated. I resent being manipulated and that rat does nothing but manipulate.

    His obvious collectivism is nothing but an affront to the principles America was founded on and has thrived on. He is perhaps the first truly Anti-American presidential candidate this country has ever seen.

    Given his upbringing, foreign education and his background, I’m not really sure that he can even be considered American in any but the narrowest legal sense, and that’s assuming that his citizenship isn’t a fraud to begin with.

    Which is probably why he is so popular overseas among people who detest us.

    And to think that half the country takes him seriously, indeed, likes him and wants to rely on him! If we needed further proof that the education “system” is shot, there we would have it.

    No, I won’t be watching that blowhard bastard on O’Reilly.

  73. #173
    On September 4th, 2008 at 8:52 pm, TexasEngineer said:

    and I just watched it…”oh we are in agreement” seemed to be the phrase of the meeting.
    I am always reminded of Charles Durning as the Governer in Best Little Whorehouse in Texas whenever I hear the man talk…dancing that little two-step.

  74. #174
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:04 pm, starlightwoman said:

    So now the surge is working beyond his wildest dreamsnightmares!

  75. #175
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:12 pm, TexasEngineer said:

    and then I switched over to Iron Chef America to avoid damaging my flat panel TV by throwing things at Lindsey Grahamnesty’s image.

  76. #176
    On September 4th, 2008 at 9:28 pm, California Red said:

    cant wait to hear more. I think Bill is fair and this will be the best chance we get to really see what Senator Obama is made of. Hillary did well with her O’Reilly appearance.

    Obama needs to be pressed and Bill did what was necessary to get the interview.

  77. #177
    On September 4th, 2008 at 10:21 pm, JDinTX said:

    I saw this first part and true to form, Obama cannot accept criticism and cannot apologize for being wrong about the surge. You can tell he still wants to negotiate with Iran and will not say he will do anything militarily against them. All he would say is that he can’t show his hand. Ha! He wants this country to be overrun.

  78. #178
    On September 4th, 2008 at 11:07 pm, joeblough said:

    .
    If you want the straight story on what SnowJoba is really about, what he stands for, and how he thinks (and it’s damned scary) go here and have a read.

    http://www.ibdeditorials.com/series8.aspx
    or
    Investor’s Business Daily: Special Editorial Series - The Audacity of Socialism

    This person really is the first truly Anti-American presidential candidate.

    IBD’s research is comprehensive and factually solid. And the message is chilling.

    A little taste:

    From: Obama’s Radical Roots And Rules

    Sen. Obama was trained by Chicago’s Industrial Areas Foundation, founded in 1940 by the radical organizer Saul Alinsky. In the 1980s, Obama spent years as director of the Developing Communities Project, which operated using Alinsky’s strategies, and was involved with two other Alinsky-oriented entities, Acorn and Project Vote. …

    … Alinsky noted that “our rebels have contemptuously rejected the values and way of life of the middle class. They have stigmatized it as materialistic, decadent, bourgeois, degenerate, imperialistic, war-mongering, brutalized and corrupt.”

    According to Alinsky, “They are right,” but he cautioned his comrades that “the power and the people are in the big middle-class majority.” Therefore, an effective radical activist “discards the rhetoric that always says ‘pig’ ” in reference to police officers, plus other forms of disguise, “to radicalize parts of the middle class.”

    Obama’s rhetorical window-dressing is easily recognizable as Alinskyesque camouflage. …

    From: Young Obama’s Red Mentor regarding Snowjoba’s “childhood mentor up to the age of 18“, Frank Marshall Davis, ‘who fled Chicago after the FBI and Congress opened investigations into his “subversive,” “un-American activities.”‘.

    In fact, Davis was a member of the Moscow-controlled Communist Party USA, according to the 1953 report of the Commission on Subversive Activities of the Territory of Hawaii, which labeled him “a bitter opponent of capitalism.” The report was introduced as evidence in the U.S. Senate Internal Security Subcommittee hearings probing the “Scope of Soviet Activity in the United States.”

    “Davis scholars dismiss the idea that he was anti-American,” the AP reports. But one of them, ex-University of Hawaii professor Kathryn Takara, acknowledges in a Ph.D. paper on Davis (not quoted by AP) that he’d been fingered as “a Communist.”

    Davis wrote militant poems as a black writer in Chicago, including one in which he hails the Soviet revolution: “Smash on, victory-eating Red Army.” He also attacked traditional Christianity, titling one inflammatory screed, “Christ is a Dixie N*****.”

    As Obama was preparing to head off to college, he sat at Davis’ feet in his Waikiki bungalow for bitter nightly bull sessions. Davis plied his impressionable guest with liberal shots of whiskey and advice, including: Never trust the white establishment.

    “They’ll train you so good,” he said, “you’ll start believing what they tell you about equal opportunity and the American way and all that sh**.”

    In the eyes of white America, Davis warned Obama: “You may be a well-trained, well-paid n*****, but you’re a n***** just the same.” He also nurtured anti-white hatred in his young mulatto subject, telling him, “Black people have a reason to hate.”

    There’s plenty more. Well documented and tightly reasoned. Read it all.

  79. #179
    On September 5th, 2008 at 12:10 am, Dan Lee said:

    More of what he SAYS he’s gonna do, & not much of HOW.. Same ol Obama..

  80. #180
    On September 5th, 2008 at 12:43 am, travlinman said:

    Bill did a lot of butt-kissin’ towards Obama tonight. Obama comes off as arrogant and will not acknowledge that he made a mistake in not supporting the surge. And Bush is the only man to never say he is sorry, huh?

    The worst part of the speech was O’Reilly making a statement about how we should never have went into Iraq and that Al Queda was not there and we caused them to come,…. blah, blah, blah. Sigh. I think it has been proven, that while no links to 9/11 existed with Saddam, the terrorists were operating and training in Iraq. Bush never said that Iraq was involved in 9/11. Those charges were from the left. I do know that Bush’s idea of fighting the terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan, rather than in Nebraska, was a good one.

    No matter what Bill O’Reilly and Barack Obama think.

  81. #181
    On September 5th, 2008 at 1:57 am, stacman said:

    Same old Obama, dancing around the questions. What’s worse is that O’Reilly is a known democrat and it’s showing…

  82. #182
    On September 6th, 2008 at 9:45 pm, reshas1 said:

    I thought Obama looked PISSED, but he was trying NOT to show it. I also would like to know if that 25 part series is still in the works. “I’ll do this interview with you if you scrub that special and if you air it the night McCain talks.”

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

You must be logged in to post a comment.

It’s beginning to look a lot like Hillmas

December 1, 2008 11:03 AM by Michelle Malkin

65 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Billary is comin’ to town.

Obama wants his Blackberry back

November 26, 2008 09:49 AM by Michelle Malkin

109 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Keeping in touch with the little people.

Obama keeps Bush’s Defense Secretary

November 25, 2008 08:05 PM by Michelle Malkin

121 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

David Brooks’ Ivy League ejaculations

November 21, 2008 10:35 AM by Michelle Malkin

112 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

Smarty pants. Panting smarty.

The ObaHillary morph: Recycling you can believe in

November 18, 2008 10:49 PM by Michelle Malkin

68 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

The more things change…


Categories: Barack Obama


Weekly Standard

» Puzzle