<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oprah vs. Sarah-cuda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/05/oprah-vs-sarah-cuda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/05/oprah-vs-sarah-cuda/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:59:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The College Politico &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Oprah pulls an &#8220;Us Weekly&#8221; and pisses off fans by dissing Palin UPDATE: (many) Others jump on the &#8220;Us Weekly&#8221; boat</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/05/oprah-vs-sarah-cuda/comment-page-2/#comment-457020</link>
		<dc:creator>The College Politico &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Oprah pulls an &#8220;Us Weekly&#8221; and pisses off fans by dissing Palin UPDATE: (many) Others jump on the &#8220;Us Weekly&#8221; boat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13838#comment-457020</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, apparently, Oprah doesn&#8217;t want to use her show as political platform&#8230; as Malkin would say &#8220;snort&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, apparently, Oprah doesn&#8217;t want to use her show as political platform&#8230; as Malkin would say &#8220;snort&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/05/oprah-vs-sarah-cuda/comment-page-2/#comment-446446</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 01:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13838#comment-446446</guid>
		<description>I think Oprah is a fat, ugly, black radical lesbian that has an effiminate gay guy to be her &quot;beard&quot;.  I have never understood why anyone would watch her. I think it might be because she is not treatening to women because she is a lesbian and doesn&#039;t want any woman&#039;s man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Oprah is a fat, ugly, black radical lesbian that has an effiminate gay guy to be her &#8220;beard&#8221;.  I have never understood why anyone would watch her. I think it might be because she is not treatening to women because she is a lesbian and doesn&#8217;t want any woman&#8217;s man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection &#171; BUUUUURRRRNING HOT</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/05/oprah-vs-sarah-cuda/comment-page-2/#comment-444965</link>
		<dc:creator>Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection &#171; BUUUUURRRRNING HOT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13838#comment-444965</guid>
		<description>[...] Oprah vs. Sarah-cuda - How does it feel to lose your place as the most electrifying woman in America, Oprah? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oprah vs. Sarah-cuda &#8211; How does it feel to lose your place as the most electrifying woman in America, Oprah? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Palin, A Woman For Times Such As These! &#171; Riggword Weblog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/05/oprah-vs-sarah-cuda/comment-page-2/#comment-444095</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Palin, A Woman For Times Such As These! &#171; Riggword Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13838#comment-444095</guid>
		<description>[...] From MIchelle Malkin: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From MIchelle Malkin: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baltimore Jack</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/05/oprah-vs-sarah-cuda/comment-page-2/#comment-444069</link>
		<dc:creator>Baltimore Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13838#comment-444069</guid>
		<description>Ignorant. Disgusting. Naive. Un-American. Infuriating.  Hmmm, Oprah reminds me of, ummm, ummm, oh yeah, the left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignorant. Disgusting. Naive. Un-American. Infuriating.  Hmmm, Oprah reminds me of, ummm, ummm, oh yeah, the left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swamp Hermit’s *QUICK* Bits &#171; The Swamp Hermit&#8217;s Report</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/05/oprah-vs-sarah-cuda/comment-page-2/#comment-443989</link>
		<dc:creator>Swamp Hermit’s *QUICK* Bits &#171; The Swamp Hermit&#8217;s Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 05:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13838#comment-443989</guid>
		<description>[...] on her show. Why? She’s apparently afraid of the damage it will do … to Barack Obama&#8230;  Oprah vs. Sarah-cuda - Wonder if she’s crying her eyelashes off again today?  ACORN Watch, Pt II: Obama hid $800,000 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on her show. Why? She’s apparently afraid of the damage it will do … to Barack Obama&#8230;  Oprah vs. Sarah-cuda &#8211; Wonder if she’s crying her eyelashes off again today?  ACORN Watch, Pt II: Obama hid $800,000 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s Palin, GET HER!!! &#171; Chockblock&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/05/oprah-vs-sarah-cuda/comment-page-2/#comment-443687</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s Palin, GET HER!!! &#171; Chockblock&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13838#comment-443687</guid>
		<description>[...] seems Us magazine took a cheap swipe at Ms. Palin and they are hemorrhaging reads as a result. Even Oprah can&#8217;t save the chosen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems Us magazine took a cheap swipe at Ms. Palin and they are hemorrhaging reads as a result. Even Oprah can&#8217;t save the chosen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wildcatter1980</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/05/oprah-vs-sarah-cuda/comment-page-2/#comment-443350</link>
		<dc:creator>Wildcatter1980</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13838#comment-443350</guid>
		<description>What I sent to Oprah:&lt;blockquote&gt;Dear Ms Winfrey,

Considering that you say “I believe that one of life’s greatest risks is never daring to take risk.” I think you should not only &quot;take the risk&quot; of having Gov. Sarah Palin on your show; you should have Senators Obama, Biden and McCain on, too. Not only would it be great television, with your fair and gracious interview style, it would be a tremendous opportunity for America to see and learn about candidates for the highest of elective offices in the country. It would help us become better-informed when it comes time to cast our votes in November.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
To comment #169, I very much disagree with the sentiments expressed within. I watched when she had Bill O&#039;Reilly on a few years back. Considering the scorn he often gets from those who disagree with him, Oprah was quite gracious and fair with him during the whole show. He, in turn, was very complimentary of his treatment by her and her staff.

I suspect that the issue in play here is that she has gone out on a limb for Obama and suffered a backlash. She sees herself between rock and a hard place because of that. She needs to decide whether it is more important to support Obama or that she help the voters in this country by providing the opportunity to get to know the candidates better and because of that greater knowledge make a better and more informed decision come November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I sent to Oprah:<br />
<blockquote>Dear Ms Winfrey,</p>
<p>Considering that you say “I believe that one of life’s greatest risks is never daring to take risk.” I think you should not only &#8220;take the risk&#8221; of having Gov. Sarah Palin on your show; you should have Senators Obama, Biden and McCain on, too. Not only would it be great television, with your fair and gracious interview style, it would be a tremendous opportunity for America to see and learn about candidates for the highest of elective offices in the country. It would help us become better-informed when it comes time to cast our votes in November.</p></blockquote>
<p>To comment #169, I very much disagree with the sentiments expressed within. I watched when she had Bill O&#8217;Reilly on a few years back. Considering the scorn he often gets from those who disagree with him, Oprah was quite gracious and fair with him during the whole show. He, in turn, was very complimentary of his treatment by her and her staff.</p>
<p>I suspect that the issue in play here is that she has gone out on a limb for Obama and suffered a backlash. She sees herself between rock and a hard place because of that. She needs to decide whether it is more important to support Obama or that she help the voters in this country by providing the opportunity to get to know the candidates better and because of that greater knowledge make a better and more informed decision come November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MajorKen</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/05/oprah-vs-sarah-cuda/comment-page-2/#comment-443240</link>
		<dc:creator>MajorKen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13838#comment-443240</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Oprah cannot stand conservatives period. &lt;/strong&gt; Her dealings with White people require them to be liberal or from Hollywood otherwise she prefers dysfunctional Whites.  I personally do not know why she does that but &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;a running theory is that it Oprah wants to expose dysfunctional Whites to her liberal viewers in order to portray them as normal.&lt;/strong&gt; 

Oprah may reject putting a strong, articulate, beautiful, Christian, woman on the program because it contradicts her created vision of white America.  

Finally, &lt;strong&gt;Oprah cares a lot more about being Black than being a woman &lt;/strong&gt;because she scorned Hillary while pushing Obama.  &lt;strong&gt;Oprah needs to spend some of her windfall billion dollar wealth to help the poor&lt;/strong&gt; in her own community rather than blaming Republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Oprah cannot stand conservatives period. </strong> Her dealings with White people require them to be liberal or from Hollywood otherwise she prefers dysfunctional Whites.  I personally do not know why she does that but <em><strong>a running theory is that it Oprah wants to expose dysfunctional Whites to her liberal viewers in order to portray them as normal.</strong> </p>
<p>Oprah may reject putting a strong, articulate, beautiful, Christian, woman on the program because it contradicts her created vision of white America.  </p>
<p>Finally, <strong>Oprah cares a lot more about being Black than being a woman </strong>because she scorned Hillary while pushing Obama.  <strong>Oprah needs to spend some of her windfall billion dollar wealth to help the poor</strong> in her own community rather than blaming Republicans.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CleanGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/05/oprah-vs-sarah-cuda/comment-page-2/#comment-443235</link>
		<dc:creator>CleanGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13838#comment-443235</guid>
		<description>If Oprah is being swayed by her staff, then she isn&#039;t the strong woman we thought her to be.  If the indicision is emminating from Oprah herself, then she STILL isn&#039;t the strong woman we thought her to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Oprah is being swayed by her staff, then she isn&#8217;t the strong woman we thought her to be.  If the indicision is emminating from Oprah herself, then she STILL isn&#8217;t the strong woman we thought her to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laree</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/05/oprah-vs-sarah-cuda/comment-page-2/#comment-443224</link>
		<dc:creator>Laree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13838#comment-443224</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t watch Oprah or the View. I do watch Ellen on occasion. Now it would be difficult, like US magazine, to give up something I don&#039;t subscribe to in the first place.

Oprah, was among the many voices who called for Imus to be fired for a satirical sound byte, that has been used since by people like Chris Rock. Oprah Fair minded hardly. I am not suprized she is at the eye of another double standard, it is how she operates.

Oprah built a girl&#039;s school in South Africa, spent millions of dollars to put her name on a building &quot;Vanity&quot; now people from Zimbabwea are pouring into South Africa because of the collapse of their Govt., brought on by Robert Mugabe people in need in Zimbabwe, I have not heard Oprah speak about them. Children in Monrovia, Liberia, go to school in a burned out church. Monrovia,Liberia, the descendants of American Slaves,who share more of connection to Oprah then people in South Africa. No help for Liberians? Not from Oprah or the folks at United Trinity (African centered church) Why not are they not just as deserving? I think it is because Liberia is pro American, and there is no publicity in helping them. When you take a close look at Oprah, she doesn&#039;t go as deep as she postures. It is all about Oprah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t watch Oprah or the View. I do watch Ellen on occasion. Now it would be difficult, like US magazine, to give up something I don&#8217;t subscribe to in the first place.</p>
<p>Oprah, was among the many voices who called for Imus to be fired for a satirical sound byte, that has been used since by people like Chris Rock. Oprah Fair minded hardly. I am not suprized she is at the eye of another double standard, it is how she operates.</p>
<p>Oprah built a girl&#8217;s school in South Africa, spent millions of dollars to put her name on a building &#8220;Vanity&#8221; now people from Zimbabwea are pouring into South Africa because of the collapse of their Govt., brought on by Robert Mugabe people in need in Zimbabwe, I have not heard Oprah speak about them. Children in Monrovia, Liberia, go to school in a burned out church. Monrovia,Liberia, the descendants of American Slaves,who share more of connection to Oprah then people in South Africa. No help for Liberians? Not from Oprah or the folks at United Trinity (African centered church) Why not are they not just as deserving? I think it is because Liberia is pro American, and there is no publicity in helping them. When you take a close look at Oprah, she doesn&#8217;t go as deep as she postures. It is all about Oprah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rambler</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/05/oprah-vs-sarah-cuda/comment-page-2/#comment-443185</link>
		<dc:creator>rambler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13838#comment-443185</guid>
		<description>I stopped watching Oprah after 9/11. She had all these onesided geopolitical discussions going, which were more propaganda than imformation. By backing BO, she was trying to influence the election. What a powerful tool for elites, dems and other wackos if she could deliver an election. Then, seemingly out of nowhere, comes Sarah Palin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stopped watching Oprah after 9/11. She had all these onesided geopolitical discussions going, which were more propaganda than imformation. By backing BO, she was trying to influence the election. What a powerful tool for elites, dems and other wackos if she could deliver an election. Then, seemingly out of nowhere, comes Sarah Palin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FireBlogger</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/05/oprah-vs-sarah-cuda/comment-page-2/#comment-443159</link>
		<dc:creator>FireBlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13838#comment-443159</guid>
		<description>A Palin visit to Oprah&#039;s couch would guarantee a victory for McCain in November.
Oprah knows this and that is why Palin will never see her set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Palin visit to Oprah&#8217;s couch would guarantee a victory for McCain in November.<br />
Oprah knows this and that is why Palin will never see her set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/05/oprah-vs-sarah-cuda/comment-page-2/#comment-443132</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13838#comment-443132</guid>
		<description>So many women I know will not have anything to do with Oprah anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many women I know will not have anything to do with Oprah anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danceswithdachshunds</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/05/oprah-vs-sarah-cuda/comment-page-2/#comment-443029</link>
		<dc:creator>Danceswithdachshunds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13838#comment-443029</guid>
		<description>I think Oprah is simply playing it safe.  She has her little vow to hide behind and being there sure beats the possibility of Sarah &lt;em&gt;declining &lt;/em&gt;the invitation.

Imagine the headline: &quot;PALIN TURNS DOWN INVITATION FROM OPRAH WINFREY&quot;  Oprah can&#039;t ri$k that happening and if I was Sarah it is exactly what I&#039;d do given the chance - snub a major BHO supporter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Oprah is simply playing it safe.  She has her little vow to hide behind and being there sure beats the possibility of Sarah <em>declining </em>the invitation.</p>
<p>Imagine the headline: &#8220;PALIN TURNS DOWN INVITATION FROM OPRAH WINFREY&#8221;  Oprah can&#8217;t ri$k that happening and if I was Sarah it is exactly what I&#8217;d do given the chance &#8211; snub a major BHO supporter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
