Did You Know...

   

Huffing HuffPo desperate for a GOP gaffe

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  September 8, 2008 01:12 PM

How desperate is the Huffington Post to point to an Obama/Biden-like rhetorical gaffe by Sarah Palin?

This desperate: (Hat tip: HA Headlines)

Gov. Sarah Palin made her first potentially major gaffe during her time on the national scene while discussing the developments of the perilous housing market this past weekend.

Speaking before voters in Colorado Springs, the Republican vice presidential nominee claimed that lending giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had “gotten too big and too expensive to the taxpayers.” The companies, as McClatchy reported, “aren’t taxpayer funded but operate as private companies. The takeover may result in a taxpayer bailout during reorganization.”

Economists and analysts pounced on the misstatement, saying it demonstrated a lack of understanding about one of the key economic issues likely to face the next administration.

“You would like to think that someone who is going to be vice president and conceivable president would know what Fannie and Freddie do,” said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. “These are huge institutions and they are absolutely central to our country’s mortgage debt. To not have a clue what they do doesn’t speak well for her, I’d say.”

The only ones without a clue here are the HuffPo’s Obama water-carriers.

As I wrote four years ago about the Fannie/Freddie racket:

Clothed in politically correct fashions (”Catch the dream,” beckons Freddie Mac’s program to boost minority home ownership; a “leader in diversity,” brags a Fannie Mae press release), these public-private hybrids are two dangerous pigs feeding at the federal trough. Congress created Fannie Mae (nickname for the Federal National Mortgage Association) in 1938 to bolster home ownership during the Depression. Three decades later, it was partially privatized, but retained a host of government benefits. In 1970, Congress spawned Freddie Mac (nickname for the Federal Home Mortgage Corp.) to provide a lending competitor to Fannie Mae. Both entities expand the pool of money for home purchasers by snapping up loans that lenders make to homebuyers, and then converting those loans into relatively safe mortgage-backed securities that are attractive to investors.

So, what’s wrong with this picture?

As Fred Smith, president of the Washington, D.C-based Competitive Enterprise Institute, has noted, these financial beasts are a textbook example of “profit-side capitalism and loss-side socialism.” When things go right for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, they keep the profits. But when things go wrong, taxpayers — not just private shareholders, managers, and employees — will be on the hook.
Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae each receive $2.25 billion lines of credit with the U.S. Treasury. These special pipelines give the institutions an implied federal guarantee available to no other private sector competitors in the mortgage market. That protection makes them immune to the costs normally associated with riskier and riskier behavior. Moreover, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are not required to pay state and local income taxes. In addition, the standard for how much money the government requires them to keep on hand in case homebuyers default on their mortgages is lower for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae than for fully private banks and thrifts. The two corporations receive an estimated $10 billion a year in hidden taxpayer subsidies.

Political appointees to the companies’ boards pocket millions in stock options to bolster support on Capitol Hill. Clinton-appointed board members at Fannie Mae include Marc Rich lawyer Jack Quinn and Janet Reno’s lieutenant at the Justice Department, Jamie Gorelick. At the helm of Fannie Mae is another Clinton appointee, Franklin Raines, who was paid more than $4 million and had almost $6 million in unexercised stock options in his first year at the helm. Cheerleaders in both major political parties have opposed privatizing Fannie and Freddie.

Now, we are on the verge of bailing out these behemoths to the tune of $200 billion in taxpayer backing — while potentially forking over untold millions in severance packages to Democrat cronies.

That makes Palin in tune with reality — and her critics flailing once again.

Meantime, King of All Gaffes Obama has problems against with rewriting history:

O-Busted: Selective Service Requirement Did Not Exist When Obama Says He Registered

And the Biden Gaffe Clock keeps on ticking.

***

Peter Viles of the excellent L.A. Land real estate/biz blog: There is no gaffe here.

blog comments powered by Disqus
~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's Email List:

GOP gives HuffPo fits: That’s the spirit!

November 4, 2010 07:35 PM by Michelle Malkin

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery…

Oprah Pays For Stewart/Colbert Audience to Attend Rally

October 15, 2010 01:41 PM by Doug Powers

Comedy Central

Snort: Huffpo writer moans about Left’s lack of “women of any wattage”

April 9, 2010 03:34 PM by Michelle Malkin

Dim bulbs.

Waaah: Libs want segregated best-seller lists

November 11, 2009 03:26 PM by Michelle Malkin

Hollywood & MoveOn.org’s insurance industry-bashing video

September 22, 2009 11:54 AM by Michelle Malkin


Categories: Health care, Hollyweird, Huffpo, MoveOn.org

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook