J.C. Penney blindsided by Us Weekly

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 8, 2008 04:16 PM

Looks like some of Us Weekly’s advertisers may not be too happy with the Democrat propganda rag’s activism.

Several readers forwarded me the following response they received to their complaints about the Palin-bashing issue:

From: JCPenney Contact Us
Date: Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: General Inquiries
To: xxx

JCPenney has very strict guidelines regarding advertising from running in any politically or religiously driven magazines or publications. At the time our ad was accepted and approved a different cover was approved for the magazine, however, with the political controversy US Weekly changed their cover and it was too late for us to withdraw.

We never want to cause our customer’s concern and apologize for the inconvenience. We appreciate your comments and feedback.

Thank you for you email.

Posted in: Sarah Palin

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  2. links for 2008-09-09 | FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog
  3. Sarah Palin Crime Scene Investigation: « Riggword Weblog
  4. Palin-Bashing ‘Us Weekly’ Offers Free Issues to Stem Avalanche of Cancellations : Stop The ACLU

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #446063
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:19 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    Yeah, so what are they going to do about it? Three guesses… and the first 2 don’t count.

  2. #446065
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:20 pm, rjbjrirish said:

    Hopefully the next time a magazine does this, JC Penney will pull its advertising!

  3. #446069
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:20 pm, LOBOMAN said:

    And I have a bridge across the East River for sale — Cheap!

  4. #446076
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:25 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    I wonder what the original cover was before US did the ol’ switcheroo. “Why She Loves Barak”?!

  5. #446078
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:26 pm, Aircraft Dispatcher said:

    Look at the B.S reply I got from Coke that doesn’t cover the issue.
    ————————————-

    Thank you for contacting The Coca-Cola Company. We appreciate the opportunity to respond.

    As a Company that conducts business in over 200 countries, we are a nonpartisan business organization and it is not our place to take positions on political matters unrelated to the beverage industry.

    Though our role as a business is inherently limited in taking a political position, throughout the world we strive to do all we can to set an example and uphold the highest standards of diversity. We believe in an inclusive and diverse workplace environment. We are focused on strategic workplace programs that help assure the success of our commitment to embracing the similarities and differences of people, cultures and ideas.

    Some Company employees do participate in the Political Action Committee, which is a voluntary association separate from The Coca-Cola Company. The PAC is bipartisan and contributes to a wide diversity of candidates–Republican, Democratic, Liberal and Conservative. It is up to the PAC to determine which candidates to support. If you are interested, the PAC makes regular public disclosure of all contributions, and its reports are on file with the Federal Election Commission in Washington, D.C.

    Should you have additional questions or comments, please feel free to contact us again.

    Industry and Consumer Affairs
    The Coca-Cola Company

  6. #446079
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:26 pm, vickisoup said:

    I don’t get the overuse of the word, “inconvenience“. It’s not “inconvenience”; it’s anger and even outrage. I wish some talking head would have the guts to call it that.
    “Dear Valued Customer….we regret the outrage this has caused”.

  7. #446083
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:28 pm, vickisoup said:

    Look at the B.S reply I got from Coke that doesn’t cover the issue.

    Well, it’s about all we can expect from the company that once, “like[d] to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony”.
    ;-)

  8. #446091
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:32 pm, changer1701 said:

    It sounds like Penney’s is really bothered about it, which is a start. I don’t know how likely it is that any of them will pull advertising, but I guess if they face enough criticism maybe they’ll take a second look at it.

  9. #446094
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:33 pm, sonofdy said:

    I am sorry but I don’t agree with this attempt to shut down this magazine based on a few mistakes. They should however be put on notice.

  10. #446095
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:34 pm, 7thson said:

    Dexter Alarius said:
    I wonder what the original cover was before US did the ol’ switcheroo.

    Probably “Back To School Fashions For Babies, Lies & Scandals”

  11. #446099
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:34 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    I think that’s where Obama got his college degree: JC Penny.

  12. #446106
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:39 pm, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    Fellow Conservative Action Takers – Do not dispair.

    I received the same response from Coca-Cola and similar ones from others. If you think about it, they are in a difficult position and are replying with a “neutral” response. Some will call me naive but I take comfort in believing that more than likely the behind-the-scenes response by the advertisers to the magazine is stronger than the public statements. I will contine to contact advetisers when I feel that they are supporting non-conservative agendas. We ARE making progress.

  13. #446112
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:42 pm, vickisoup said:

    I agree with LMC above.

  14. #446113
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:44 pm, James Felix said:

    I am sorry but I don’t agree with this attempt to shut down this magazine based on a few mistakes. They should however be put on notice.

    I don’t think anyone is trying to “shut them down”. People are making their displeasure known to advertisers, as they have every right to do. If enough negative feedback comes through those advertisers may very well yank their ads. On the other hand if Obama’s supporters want to flood the advertisers with positive feedback then they may conclude that on balance they have pleased more people than they’ve pissed off and things will continue as they are now.

    This is how the free market and First Amendment are supposed to work. There’s nothing unseemly about it.

  15. #446117
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:46 pm, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    Opops, should have been I will contine to contact advetisers when I feel that they are NOT supporting non-conservative agendas.

  16. #446121
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:48 pm, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    Oops, Oops.

    Posting too fast and trying to read/reply to my Email at the same time.

    First one was correct.

  17. #446123
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:52 pm, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    Now I know what Obama must feel like when he flip-flops several times within a few minutes!

  18. #446124
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:52 pm, Mercy4Me said:

    “Who Is Khalid al-Mansour?”

  19. #446125
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:54 pm, Mercy4Me said:

    The friend’s name is Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, from Texas,” Sutton said. “He is the principal adviser to one of the world’s richest men. He told me about Obama.”

  20. #446127
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:55 pm, Mercy4Me said:

    Obama Had Close Ties to Top Saudi Adviser at Early Age

  21. #446128
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:56 pm, ajmontana said:

    Original Cover
    Odopey quivering under his Bus with all his looney friends.
    Well it shoulda been. 8)

  22. #446129
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:56 pm, Mercy4Me said:

    Why has this story not gotten much play?

  23. #446130
    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:56 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:39 pm, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    I will contine to contact advetisers when I feel that they are supporting non-conservative agendas. We ARE making progress.

    I hope so, but not so sure. They’re not so much supporting non-conservative agendas, as anti-freedom agendas.

    Study the many socialist and communist revolutions in the past. There were plenty of rich capitalists, companies and organizations that supported them.

    They thought they could “ride the tiger,” that they could end up on top of the whole thing. “Oh, I am friends with Hitler, he will give me many contracts” or “Lenin, yes, I gave him money, he will owe me…” “We can deal with Chavez, he’ll play ball…”

    Once you unleash the tiger, though, there’s no guarantee that the tiger won’t end up eating you when no one is left.

    And the tiger they’re trying to let out this time will control the whole world. Nowhere for jews or catholics or dissidents to flee to, nowhere for anyone to hide.

  24. #446137
    On September 8th, 2008 at 5:00 pm, docflash said:

    I like Pennys,I will give them the benefit of the doubt.

  25. #446139
    On September 8th, 2008 at 5:01 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:33 pm, sonofdy said:
    I am sorry but I don’t agree with this attempt to shut down this magazine based on a few mistakes. They should however be put on notice.

    I am in complete favor. I think they should keep it up and go the route of the NYT’s. They can shoot themselves in the foot until there reader base is friends and relatives (and people who forgot to send the second cancelation notices in).

  26. #446146
    On September 8th, 2008 at 5:07 pm, Paul Revere said:

    Every Penny’s store I’ve ever been to has a cramped feeling. Just way too many different makers of the same-looking clothes. The best possible course of action would be to cancel a subscription if you have one, or not buy it off the race. The falling sales numbers will, eventually, force advertisers away. ;)

  27. #446147
    On September 8th, 2008 at 5:08 pm, Paul Revere said:

    Ooops…”race” should be “rack”. I’ll now be labeled as racist! :(

  28. #446149
    On September 8th, 2008 at 5:14 pm, shooter said:

    4:52 pm, Mercy4Me
    4:54 pm, Mercy4Me
    4:55 pm, Mercy4Me
    .

    Just where is it that you think you are right now?

  29. #446151
    On September 8th, 2008 at 5:16 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    It sounds like Penney’s is really bothered about it, which is a start. I don’t know how likely it is that any of them will pull advertising, but I guess if they face enough criticism maybe they’ll take a second look at it.

    Which means Penney’s understands that in a consumer-driven market place, good public opinion = money. Bad public opinion = loss of money.

  30. #446154
    On September 8th, 2008 at 5:16 pm, vickisoup said:

    A bunch of us are butterfingers today.
    :P

  31. #446157
    On September 8th, 2008 at 5:19 pm, fred5676 said:

    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:33 pm, sonofdy said:

    I am sorry but I don’t agree with this attempt to shut down this magazine based on a few mistakes. They should however be put on notice.

    This wasn’t a “mistake” – it was a deliberate effort to smear her and curry favor from the Obama campaign:

    From a previous MM post:

    A source forwards the following e-mail from former Clinton operative and Us weekly flack, Mark Neschis, that went out to all media in St. Paul:

    Thought I would send over our Us Weekly/Sarah Palin cover story, on stands Friday, if helpful in your coverage. Might be useful as an illustration of how the news is playing out.(Us Weekly has 12 million, mostly female readers)

    Mark Neschis
    Corporate Communications Director
    Wenner Media
    Us Weekly | Rolling Stone | Men’s Journal

  32. #446158
    On September 8th, 2008 at 5:19 pm, sonofdy said:

    The nice thing about our side for the fence is we can disagree without going into hyper attack mode!!!

  33. #446160
    On September 8th, 2008 at 5:23 pm, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    There are a lot of issues involved in canceling an advertising contract. One example, retroactive loss of volume discounts. Thus, I do not expect immediate response.

    I really do believe that our letters and telephone calls are making a difference. Remember the results of our SHAMENASTY calls. I called both of my Senators and My Congretional Representative (All liberal deomcrate, after all I am from Massachusetts.) I got neutral and sometimes defensive responses but collectively we got our message across.

    We need to stay focused and keep up the pressure until November.

  34. #446172
    On September 8th, 2008 at 5:34 pm, Mixer14 said:

    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:25 pm, Dexter Alarius said:
    I wonder what the original cover was before US did the ol’ switcheroo. “Why She Loves Barak”?!

    Sheer Speculation here but it could have been:

    * Tears in my ears – the search for Oprah’s lost eyelashes

    * Nancy Pelosi to the Oil Comapnies “Drill this!”

    * Chuck Shumer’s swaps his favorite banking tips with Joe Biden.

    * John Edwards – back in the spotlight becuause he has a family to support.

    * Hillary Clinton talks about 2012 – the next Olympics we face.

  35. #446182
    On September 8th, 2008 at 5:42 pm, Ron said:

    What about the pro-Obama cover run previously? No complaints, so no harm, no foul, I suppose. But don’t ya think it was just a wee bit politically motivated?

  36. #446192
    On September 8th, 2008 at 5:51 pm, ajmontana said:

    Obamas wasn’t a hit piece, and there’s more dirt on him than pigs in a mud hole. :roll:

  37. #446201
    On September 8th, 2008 at 6:01 pm, memyselfandi said:

    thank you for you email?? geez.

  38. #446206
    On September 8th, 2008 at 6:09 pm, Papa Louie said:

    sonofdy said:

    I am sorry but I don’t agree with this attempt to shut down this magazine based on a few mistakes. They should however be put on notice.

    I’m not sure what you’re saying here, sonofdy.

    Are you saying that it’s OK for them to use lies and rumors to influence the election and try to “shut down” the Republican nominee, but it’s not OK for us to cancel our subscriptions? We should just put them “on notice” by saying: “Don’t do this again or I’m going to cancel.”

    Or are you saying that those who exercise free speech rights should not be held accountable for what they say?

    Or are you saying that only those on the left have free speech rights and the rest of us need to just shut up and take it?

    You’re not trying to shut us down are you? What exactly are you saying?

  39. #446211
    On September 8th, 2008 at 6:16 pm, navywife91 said:

    One of the great things that has come from the Palin controversy is that it has inspired me to get involved, not just talk about what needs to be done. We can complain all we want, but some of us actually wrote letters, made phone calls, etc. in order to make our feelings known, and that’s a positive thing.

  40. #446212
    On September 8th, 2008 at 6:16 pm, rooster said:

    Any legal minds that can read between the lines? If the cover isn’t the approved cover, would Us have to pay back to Pennys all advertising fees? Are they just giving lip service to us dumbos, who are silently clutching our bibles and clinging to our guns?

  41. #446341
    On September 8th, 2008 at 7:38 pm, txvet2 said:

    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:54 pm, Mercy4Me said:

    The friend’s name is Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, from Texas,” Sutton said. “He is the principal adviser to one of the world’s richest men. He told me about Obama.”

    He also writes a newspaper column and is a primary defender of militant Islam.

  42. #446363
    On September 8th, 2008 at 7:57 pm, frontierguy said:

    Hey Aircraft…that was the exact same bs form letter I got from coke as well. I sent them a thank you for their thought out form letter and told them that pepsi would get the money I used to shell out for diet coke.

  43. #446373
    On September 8th, 2008 at 8:01 pm, TiminPhx said:

    This is putting them on notice.

    A harsh e mail in and by itself means nothing to these people.

    When you are a souless lib, the only things that matter usually is your sense of self importance. And that means also…CASH.

    You want to let a business know you don’t like them trying to serve you a side order of their politics, then you cost them some business.

    Everything else is just “buzz” to them and in a ironic and sad way, they like it.

  44. #446385
    On September 8th, 2008 at 8:13 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    PEPSI –

    Rum and PEPSI…

    I own stock in PEPSI –so— you all could help a “fellow traveler” and SWITCH !!! :-)

  45. #446416
    On September 8th, 2008 at 8:43 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Letters to advertisers always work. Keep it up.

  46. #446435
    On September 8th, 2008 at 9:06 pm, NY Andy said:

    Here’s the non-response I got from McDonalds. My original email follows their response.

    Hello Andrew:

    Thank you for contacting McDonald’s. I’m sorry you’re disappointed with our

    advertising in US Weekly. We would never purposely offend any of our

    customers, and we certainly appreciate being made aware of your concern. I

    hope the explanation below helps you understand how our advertising is

    developed.

    McDonald’s has 21 regional offices throughout the U.S. who work together with

    local advertising agencies to produce hundreds of advertisements to reach the

    diverse range of customers we serve. Most of our advertisements are targeted

    to the public at large. However, sometimes advertisements target specific

    groups (young children, teenagers, various ethnic groups, etc.). This

    decision is made locally and the ad itself is developed locally to reach a

    particular audience in a certain market.

    Customer feedback is very important and helps us to improve our business.

    Please know that your comments have been shared with the McDonald’s regional

    office responsible for airing the commercial you heard. appropriate people at

    McDonald’s.

    Once again, thank you for taking the time to let us know how you feel. We

    hope to have the opportunity of serving you again in the future. .We hope

    you will be more satisfied with future local McDonald’s advertisements .

    Jennifer
    McDonald’s Customer Response Center

    ref#:5403639

    ————————————————————————————————————–

    Please do not “reply” to this email response. All “replies” go to an unmonitored mailbox and are not reviewed. If you wish to contact McDonald’s Customer Response Center again, please visit our website at http://www.mcdonalds.com.

    You wrote:

    I am a father whose 5 children and 6 granchildren have made Mickey Ds their second home. My 2 teenagers visit regularly and I enjoy your food a few times a week myself.

    Our patronage will come to an end if you continue to support Us magazine with your advertising dollars. Their vile, vicious, and completely unfair attack on the Governor of Alaska was little more than an in-kind contribution to Barack Obama from his supporter, Mr. Wenner. McDonalds should be embarasseded to have their good name associated with this partisan trash.

    I look forward to your thoughts on this issue.

    Regards,
    Andy

    I responded with:

    Your non-answer to my complaint regarding your advertising relationship with US Weekly is so insulting that I will find it hard to patronize you in the future. Do you really think I am ignorant enough to believe that contracts with a national magazine are made at regional offices?

    The bottom line is: Do you intend to maintain the status quo in a business relationship that will be viewed by myself and untold thousands of others as an in-kind contribution to Barack Obama?

    If you are unwilling to be discrete in how you spend your advertising dollars then I assure you I will be very discrete in where I spend my food dollars.

    No response yet.

    I’ve since been told that it is possible to have regional advertising in a national magazine but still think that, in a large company, full autonomy isn’t something you’ll find in a regional office.

  47. #446441
    On September 8th, 2008 at 9:18 pm, JDinTX said:

    Ny Andy – McDonald’s is so pro-gay that you can be sure they are trying to help out the Obama campaign. they will never give you a straight answer on any complaint.

  48. #446443
    On September 8th, 2008 at 9:19 pm, Rob said:

    I really didn’t know that “J.C.Penny” even existed. I have heard the name in an old movie or something…

  49. #446490
    On September 8th, 2008 at 10:29 pm, pdv said:

    If I was JC Penny, I would ask and then sue for a complete refund or just not pay when the invoice comes in.

  50. #446491
    On September 8th, 2008 at 10:31 pm, Retsin said:

    A little off topic but, I got a free issue of Us today in the mail and I’m sure you can guess which issue it was. I can get up to 4 free issues! I’m returning the whole issue with a few of my thoughts. I’m sure no one will read it but it makes me feel better.

  51. #446527
    On September 8th, 2008 at 11:43 pm, Common Sense said:

    The advertisers will make things good once they see the reduction in subscriptions and sales of the magazines. Fewer eyes, less value for the advertising, spend money elsewhere.

    I’m sure none of these companies saw or knew about the cover and article before it was for sale.

  52. #446530
    On September 8th, 2008 at 11:53 pm, novaculus said:

    A couple of points.

    1) re # 40

    On September 8th, 2008 at 6:16 pm, rooster said:

    Any legal minds that can read between the lines? If the cover isn’t the approved cover, would Us have to pay back to Pennys all advertising fees? Are they just giving lip service to us dumbos, who are silently clutching our bibles and clinging to our guns?

    From a legal standpoint, what we have here is a breach of contract. Penney’s bought ad space in a magazine with specified content, i.e., a particular cover. US runs the ad with a different cover. That is a breach. JCP has damages, i.e., they have been exposed to criticism and even loss of business as a direct result of the breach. They have a good case for canceling any remaining contract obligations, and a good argument for damages. I don’t think US will be trying to impose any retroactive penalties for loss of volume discounts; likely their attorneys will be trying to minimize their losses.

    2) Don’t worry about canned responses. They are cheap to do, most corps consider them better than no response. They might well reflect a customer service dept that is overwhelmed with complaints and is unable to respond in any other way for the time being.

    But they will at least do a tally, and believe me, the marketing guys will NOT be happy about massive complaints and threats to boycott. There may be no apparent effect immediately, but there will be an effect.

    #46 Andy’s 2nd e-mail is the kind of thing that will really get their attention. Getting a second e-mail tells them it isn’t just some hothead blowing off steam who is going to forget it and have a Coke at McDonald’s tomorrow. So if you got a canned response, write them again. Be polite, but tell them it wasn’t good enough, and now you think they don’t value you as a customer.

    And if you can, call these companies on the phone. It is MUCH more costly for companies to handle phone complaints than e-mails. If you really want to get their attention, kick them square in the wallet. Be nice (the person on the phone is just doing a job) but make your point. I am just saying I won’t be buying their product, etc., until they stop advertising with US or the other Wenner publications.

    Keep up the pressure. Time to punish Wenner; he is a notorious ass who reportedly takes sadistic pleasure in personally firing people and humiliating them in the process. He has been asking for it for years; let’s give it to him big time.

  53. #446591
    On September 9th, 2008 at 1:45 am, Texhoma said:

    JCP and other advertisers are not taking this seriously. They believe we are stupid and will accept this crap. They believe as soon as the election is over we will forget and go give them our business again.

    Big mistake JCP and McDonald’s.

  54. #446638
    On September 9th, 2008 at 6:02 am, graysonret said:

    Major companies, like JC Penny, should take a serious hard look at what the dems are thinking. These companies pay more corporate tax than any other country in the world, which is why companies are leaving the U.S.. Once the dems have total control, expect those taxes to go even higher. “Their fair share” and “for the children” is the excuses. Of course, the consumer will pay, not the corporation. Once the economy goes flat, expect the dems to do exactly what they planned in the beginning, “bailout” the companies. Ireland has a business tax of only 15% and is prosperous. I’ve noticed some products I buy are marked “Made in Ireland”. That’s where I would move my corporate HQ, if I could.

  55. #446719
    On September 9th, 2008 at 9:32 am, dustoffmom said:

    I had also written to JCP and last evening got the IDENTICAL response as those listed above. We have so often heard the bemoaning of ‘internet/blog driven serial letters and calls’ yet here are these companies doing the exact thing. Have someone draft a nondescript note that says nothing and don’t even bother reading beyond the first sentence of the complaint before hitting repy, paste in the response, hit send….voila, end of problem. Except I already know what they replied to A and C knows what they replied to me, and we all know they are still not listening to their customers!

  56. #446757
    On September 9th, 2008 at 10:10 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:33 pm, sonofdy said:

    I am sorry but I don’t agree with this attempt to shut down this magazine based on a few mistakes. They should however be put on notice.

    Waging a shut down campaign is “put on notice”. See how that works?
    Attacking, Lying About and Smearing Governor Palin is not a few mistakes it is Attacking, Lying About and Smearing.
    See how that works?

    Hey Obama-Want to see Bitter?
    Look at your wife.

  57. #446778
    On September 9th, 2008 at 10:26 am, K2 said:

    I would not be too harsh on JC Penneys ‘canned’ response. Once their inbox lit-up with all the complaints, one person was instructed to put together a response.

    Since each email was about the same issue, a canned response was reasonable.

    I suspect JC Penneys will take a close look at any further dealings with the magazine.

  58. #447285
    On September 9th, 2008 at 1:46 pm, Papa Louie said:

    On September 8th, 2008 at 4:33 pm, sonofdy said:

    I am sorry but I don’t agree with this attempt to shut down this magazine based on a few mistakes. They should however be put on notice.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but it sures sounds to me like you’re saying:

    “I want to freely express MY opinion that the rest of you slobs out there should not be so free in expressing YOUR opinions.”

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The indelible whiteness of MSNBC

November 23, 2009 05:07 AM by Michelle Malkin

101 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Palin-bashers of pallor.

Who’s afraid of conservative American women?

November 16, 2009 11:17 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“Extreme” in a skirt.

Sarah Palin: “Going Rogue”

September 28, 2009 05:52 PM by Michelle Malkin

96 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

Letterman’s half-assed apology; Update: Palin accepts

June 15, 2009 11:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

149 Comments | 25 Trackbacks

Bad joke.

David Letterman: Perv

June 12, 2009 04:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

766 Comments | 61 Trackbacks

Why they hate us

June 11, 2009 11:42 AM by Michelle Malkin

195 Comments | 25 Trackbacks


Categories: Sarah Palin



Nice Deb

» O
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook