Lipstick jungle: Team McCain responds

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 10, 2008 09:29 AM

McCain’s ad team is working 24/7. They are capitalizing on Obama’s botched lipstick joke (“Lipstick Bungle” in the immortal NYPost headline writers’ words) and pounding him hard:

I’ve always said that mockery is the better medicine when it comes to Obama. But he’s been such a thug, I’m not feeling sorry for him at all this morning.

The RNC had great fun giving away tire gauges after The One promoted tire inflation to solve the energy crisis.

I’m thinking the McCain campaign store should come up with some cute lipstick-themed gear — maybe lipstick keychains? Or t-shirts with a lip print and “Kiss Off, Obama!” I know our Photoshoppers out there will come up with fun stuff.

I’d buy.

***

Reader Patrick e-mails that he attended the Ohio McCain-Palin rally yesterday: “I was with my wife at the rally today I thought you should know that a lot of women in the crowd were holding up their lipstick to Sarah.” (This was before Obama’s pig remarks, Patrick notes.)

Yes, Team McCain should definitely get some official lipstick products out for sale. They will sell like hotcakes.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. New McCain/Palin Web Ad In Response To Obama’s “Lipstick On A Pig” Comments : BigMouthFrog
  2. The Potency of Palin (UPDATED) « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
  3. Lip-stick in the eye at sprignaturemoves.com
  4. Stuck On Stupid
  5. Why Obama was a “community organizer” and not a comedy organizer (UPDATED) « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
  6. Lipstick jungle: Team McCain responds « Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian
  7. On Pigs, Lipstick, Fish, And The Middle Finger « Quipster
  8. Lipstick & Pigs To Lipschtick & Guns : BigMouthFrog
  9. Conservative Musings

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #448595
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:31 am, Jim M. said:

    But, but, it was Innocent! Just like his one fingered salute of Hillary:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zhkq11UExcw

  2. #448597
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:32 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    Great.. I’m glad they are on top of it.

    Obama is truly a Jack-Ass for the ages.

  3. #448601
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:33 am, sonofdy said:

    What happened to the issues LGM???

  4. #448603
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:34 am, guitarplayer said:

    Good ad. They conclusion with Couric was very powerful. I still think it was a stupid gaffe and not a deliberate attack, but it’s going to cost him big.

  5. #448611
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:37 am, Socky said:

    I think the campaign risks making too big a deal out of this. McPalin probably could have handled it better by having Palin addressing a rally by saying, “Ladies and gentlemen, I have one word for the Obama campaign. ‘Oink!’”

    That said, with the Obama campaign whining that “‘community organizer’ is a code-word for ‘black’,” his followers really have no place to lecture others on being overly sensitive.

  6. #448613
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:39 am, sonofdy said:

    I still think it was a stupid gaffe and not a deliberate attack, but it’s going to cost him big.

    It doesn’t matter what he really meant by it because of the context of the rest of the smears. Any negative mention of Palin is going to be risky for Obama from now on. The dems sure unloaded both barrels into thier own foot on this one.

  7. #448616
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:39 am, navywife91 said:

    Although I do not believe Obama directly called Palin a pig, he had to have known how this “joke” was going to be perceived by his supporters. The more I see the video, the more I’m convinced of that. It’s pretty clear from their reaction that they took it as a slam on Palin. I actually believe Obama, for an instant(watch his hand slightly cover his face as he’s beginning) considered not saying this. He did not listen to his instincts and made a big mistake as a result.

  8. #448621
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:40 am, maine yankee said:

    If the Obamasiah wishes to apologize;

    “I’M ALL EARS”

  9. #448622
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:43 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    One word for Obama: inexperience.

    He’s soooo not ready for primetime. Wait’ll the debates start. I’ve stocked up on my popcorn… have you? ;-)

  10. #448625
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:43 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:39 am, sonofdy said:

    Any negative mention of Palin is going to be risky for Obama from now on. The dems sure unloaded both barrels into thier own foot on this one.

    Exactly. White woman voters are leaving Obama in droves. This kind of remark (innocent or not) isn’t going to bring them back.

  11. #448624
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:43 am, Artbyruth said:

    I had been away from the computer for several hours and didn’t hear about this until late last night. The first thing I read was Obama’s quote….and the first thing I said to myself was, “Did he just call Palin a pig?”

    So, most people’s first reactions were that he was talking about Sarah Palin.

    Bad politics.

    I think the ad is a bit much and McPalin shouldn’t address it at all from the stump. They should just let people discuss it on their own.

    They should just give their speeches to the masses, talk about what they will do for our country….and wait patiently until the next Obama gaffe. It’s coming!

  12. #448628
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:44 am, sonofdy said:

    Our VP in lipstick looks better than your VP in lipstick!!!

    :lol:

  13. #448629
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:45 am, vcferlita said:

    I would definitely buy too. I’m getting my wallet out now.

  14. #448631
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:45 am, Regulus said:

    Hopenchange has a weakness that takes a little time to exploit but pays big dividends: his combination of a monumental ego, towering arrogance and thin skin makes it easy to goad him.

    All Team McCain needs to do is to keep needling him, and eventually he’ll burst out with some over-the-top reaction. He can’t help himself.

  15. #448633
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:46 am, lgm said:

    The screen says “Obama on Palin”, but Obama was talking about McCain policies, not McCain personally and certainly not Palin.

    This video is a lie, like much of the McCain campaign (Palin did not oppose the bridge to nowhere until Congress killed it, Obama did not push sex education for kindergartners, …).

    The sad thing is that this campaign style works. By the time the press figures out that this attack on Obama is a lie, the McCain people will pull out another whopper that keeps the press in a tizzy for a few days more. Anything to keep people from the issues.

    Unemployment is at a new high.

    If Bush follows through on his pledge to remove 8000 troops from Iraq (a big if), there still will be more troops than before the surge.

    Regulators sat on their (chairs) while predatory lending created the subprime fiasco that is taking down one financial institution after another.

    The Federal budget deficit was about $160Billion last year and is projected to be over $400Billion this year.

  16. #448634
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:46 am, Paul Revere said:

    The McCain team should let this simmer and not over-cook it. The voters know when they see an uppity politician smear a lady, so there is no need to get severly off track here.

  17. #448637
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:47 am, navywife91 said:

    Our VP in lipstick looks better than your VP in lipstick!!!

    I’m sure that depends on who you talk to. :smile:

  18. #448638
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:48 am, PKAmmoTroop said:

    What do you get when you put lipstick on a community organizer?

  19. #448639
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:48 am, southsideironworks said:

    The Obamites threw down the gauntlet, McCain-Palin is offering up some payback.

    Barry O has fallen squarely into the trap set for him. He’s become the typical Washington politician.

  20. #448640
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:48 am, misterbee241 said:

    Obama said what he said because he was on his own. There was no teleprompter with words that somebody else had written for him to speak. He cant speak on his own, he’s very inarticulate despite what Slo-Joe Biden says.
    I personally think he was referring to Sarah as the pig in lipstick. But that’s just me – I usually expect the worst from people and I usually get it.

  21. #448641
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:48 am, John Deaux said:

    BO is seeing his numbers drop and will get more negative with more accusations as we get closer to election day. Let’s just hope the McCain camp can keep up with these witty retorts to his sophomoric um um um jokes.

  22. #448642
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:48 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:44 am, sonofdy said:

    Our VP in lipstick looks better than your VP in lipstick anything!!!

    Fixed. ;-)

  23. #448643
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:49 am, granite said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:34 am, guitarplayer said:
    Good ad. They conclusion with Couric was very powerful. I still think it was a stupid gaffe and not a deliberate attack, but it’s going to cost him big.

    Ah, but remember – one definition of “gaffe” is what someone utters when he says what he really thinks!

  24. #448645
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:50 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    Nice, only there’s no possible way to interpret Obama as referring to Sarah Palin in the context of what he was saying.

    This is good.

    McCain said used the same expression last year about Hillary’s health care proposal.

    And then he said about engaging Mitt Romney: “Never get into a wrestling match with a pig. You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.”

    Jane Swift says on behalf of McCain that Obama called Sarah Palin a pig. And then she says McCain never called Romney a pig.

    Come on.

  25. #448646
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:50 am, Red State Skeptic said:
  26. #448647
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:51 am, sonofdy said:

    The screen says “Obama on Palin”, but Obama was talking about McCain policies, not McCain personally and certainly not Palin.

    Sure, nudge nudge wink wink…

    Anything to keep people from the issues.

    Issues like Trig Palins “real” mother? :roll:

    If Bush follows through on his pledge to remove 8000 troops from Iraq (a big if), there still will be more troops than before the surge.

    Even obama called for a “smart” draw down once violence was down.

    Unemployment is at a new high.

    Yeah we finaly got to clintons levels.

    The Federal budget deficit was about $160Billion last year and is projected to be over $400Billion this year.

    Passed by a DEMOCRATIC congress. HHHMMM good point.

  27. #448648
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:51 am, bfly1133 said:

    The ad is okay, but not the best use of funds or a great focus for the campaign. Let the Obama-Biden campaign do themselves in. I don’t see the ad being a postive or a negative…it’s just there. I will say it is an interesting way to showcase the differences between the candidates.

    However…I would totally buy lipstick related products! I would have purchased them before this episode as well.

  28. #448653
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:52 am, navywife91 said:

    Nice, only there’s no possible way to interpret Obama as referring to Sarah Palin in the context of what he was saying.

    You are correct, which is why many of us are giving him the benefit of the doubt. Regardless, he made a huge error, considering Palin’s joke last week, and has now left himself open for criticism. You cannot deny that.

  29. #448655
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:53 am, englishqueen01 said:

    I still think it was a stupid gaffe and not a deliberate attack, but it’s going to cost him big.

    But when you are communicating, there is responsibility on your part to make sure the recipients of your message understand it correctly.

    I don’t think this was intentional – but I think Obama was careless for not realizing exactly how this would be interpreted by his supporters, who’ve shown nothing but hatred and contempt for Palin.

    And – since the left is equating the term “community organizer” with “black” – it’s pretty silly for anyone to argue this botched joke won’t bite Obama in the rear.

  30. #448657
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:54 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:49 am, granite said:

    Ah, but remember – one definition of “gaffe” is what someone utters when he says what he really thinks!

    Yes, but since when is Obama good at thinking on his feet? ;-)

  31. #448658
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:54 am, englishqueen01 said:

    By the way – if McCain staffers are reading this – I’d so totally buy some lipstick gear from the campaign!

  32. #448661
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:55 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    You are correct, which is why many of us are giving him the benefit of the doubt. Regardless, he made a huge error, considering Palin’s joke last week, and has now left himself open for criticism. You cannot deny that.

    So because he made an “error” that gives Palin-McCain the right to lie that he was talking about her? (And the only error is that it allows Palin-McCain to lie!)

  33. #448662
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:55 am, Paul-Cincy said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:50 am, Red State Skeptic said:
    Nice, only there’s no possible way to interpret Obama as referring to Sarah Palin in the context of what he was saying.

    You need to direct your comments to the crowd who was hooting and laughing and applauding and on their feet. You’d think they never heard the good old “lipstick on a pig” line. Tell them there was NO POSSIBLE WAY to think Obama was refering to Palin. So they are all just CRAZY PEOPLE.

  34. #448663
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:56 am, MES401067 said:

    They know what they did its a war of words all day long.He knew what he was saying may have been scripted or just his dumb *ss talking I would say the latter.

  35. #448664
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:56 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:53 am, englishqueen01 said:

    But when you are communicating, there is responsibility on your part to make sure the recipients of your message understand it correctly.

    Exactly right. This is why Obama needs to come out and apologize immediately. If he does, this will go away quickly. If he doesn’t and just makes excuses, his poll numbers will continue to drop.

  36. #448665
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:57 am, Jon Brodin said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:37 am, Socky said: “…‘Oink!’”

    Priceless. At first listen, I took it for an often overused expression. But the reaction from the audience has me believing that if he wasn’t taking a jab, he should have immediately corrected their misinterpretation. Therefore, I believe he was attacking Palin’s lipstick joke.

  37. #448667
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:57 am, BemusedLib said:

    Again, the McCain campaign diverts attention from its support of a failed republican agenda with a manufactured smear. If possible, they’ll go the entire campaign and never engage on anything of substance.

    Excellent tactics. And revealing.

  38. #448668
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:58 am, sonofdy said:

    So because he made an “error” that gives Palin-McCain the right to lie that he was talking about her? (And the only error is that it allows Palin-McCain to lie!)

    He made a mistake, his best move would be to let it go and move on. The reason this is anything at all is the 70 plus smears on palin in the last 2 weeks.

  39. #448670
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:58 am, ajmontana said:

    LGM posed for the Obama economy plan.

    Odopey economy

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′

  40. #448674
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:00 am, Paul-Cincy said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:57 am, BemusedLib said:
    Again, the McCain campaign diverts attention from its support of a failed republican agenda

    You’re certainly *hack* entitled to *hack* your opinion *hack*. Excuse me, I’m getting a cold. *hack*

  41. #448675
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:00 am, Goldwater Knight said:

    lgm said:

    Unemployment is at a new high.

    Do you know what unemployment is in socialist Germany? About twice as much!

  42. #448677
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:00 am, englishqueen01 said:

    If possible, they’ll go the entire campaign and never engage on anything of substance.

    Excellent tactics. And revealing.

    Yeah – kind of sounds like the Democrats who have spent the past two weeks smearing Sarah Palin as a bad mother, mocking her “retarded” child (Bill Maher refers to Trig Palin as “it”), lying about her record, and showing us all that the left HATES conservative women.

    Get over yourselves, Bemused and Red State.

    We’re merely giving the Obama campaign the scrutiny the media (and you) won’t. And until the left stops saying words like “community organizer” are “coded racism”, your arguments are just still.

  43. #448678
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:01 am, sonofdy said:

    Again, the McCain campaign diverts attention from its support of a failed republican agenda with a manufactured smear. If possible, they’ll go the entire campaign and never engage on anything of substance.

    Substance like Palin banning books that didn’t exist yet? Or perhaps substance like her husband fathering her son with her daughter? That sort of substance?

    Excellent tactics. And revealing.

    Yes I found it very revealing about the DNC.

  44. #448679
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:01 am, John Deaux said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:55 am, Red State Skeptic said:
    So because he made an “error” that gives Palin-McCain the right to lie that he was talking about her? (And the only error is that it allows Palin-McCain to lie!)

    Apparently, all of the foreign press seems to think it was intentional. And foreign opinion is sacrosanct to the left.

  45. #448680
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:01 am, sambo said:

    I can’t wait to her JoeBama call Palin sweety!

  46. #448681
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:01 am, Goldwater Knight said:

    BemusedLib (the man with a 180 IQ)said:

    Excellent tactics.

    I’ll leave it at that.

  47. #448682
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:01 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:57 am, BemusedLib said:

    Again, the McCain campaign diverts attention from its support of a failed republican agenda with a manufactured smear. If possible, they’ll go the entire campaign and never engage on anything of substance.

    Excellent tactics. And revealing.

    Just like the democrats calling into question who Palin’s son’s dad is and her pregnant teenage daughter. You’re right – very revealing.

  48. #448683
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:01 am, englishqueen01 said:

    Do you know what unemployment is in socialist Germany? About twice as much!

    Yep. Because socialism is about making everyone live in equal poverty and squalor. Not about making everyone equally wealthy.

  49. #448684
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:02 am, dominigan said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:46 am, lgm said:

    The screen says “Obama on Palin”, but Obama was talking about McCain policies, not McCain personally and certainly not Palin.

    I didn’t see that. I first thought it was a personal attack on Palin. And judging from the audience reaction, they did too. That Obama didn’t correct them (if your defense is accurate), speaks volumes about his lack of ethics.

    This video is a lie, like much of the McCain campaign (Palin did not oppose the bridge to nowhere until Congress killed it, Obama did not push sex education for kindergartners, …).

    It used to be that if it were caught on film, it could be used as evidence. Are you saying that we computer generated an Obama to say those things? Sorry, but Obama did say those things, in the assumed context.

    I for one, applaud Sarah (assuming she did change her support on the bridge to nowhere) in changing her stance to the correct one based on feedback from the American people. What does that say about Obama and Biden, who continued their support for the bridge even after the backlash? Is this change?

    The sad thing is that this campaign style works. By the time the press figures out that this attack on Obama is a lie, the McCain people will pull out another whopper that keeps the press in a tizzy for a few days more. Anything to keep people from the issues.

    I agree. Oh, you’re talking about attacks ON Obama, not attacks BY Obama. The problem with your statement is that the MSM is actively trying to discount McCain, while giving Obama a pass. Based on the number of rumors reported as “news” by the MSM, I’d say if this were untrue, they’d be all over it within minutes, not weeks or months as you allude.

    Unemployment is at a new high.

    You must be a young-pup. I know for a fact unemployment has been much higher in the past, usually under a Democratic president.

    If Bush follows through on his pledge to remove 8000 troops from Iraq (a big if), there still will be more troops than before the surge.

    And? Sounds like you’re just miffed that we’re winning and following logic. Since Obama has flipped on this, do you support him and Bush, or some other approach?

    Regulators sat on their (chairs) while predatory lending created the subprime fiasco that is taking down one financial institution after another.

    Most of these problems were caused by too much Government interference in business. They regulate that lenders must give special consideration to high risks “because it helps the poor”, but ignore the consequences of taking on that risk.

    The Federal budget deficit was about $160Billion last year and is projected to be over $400Billion this year.

    Isn’t it the job of the (Democratic) Congress to put together the budget?

    You might want to come back when you’re not firing so many blanks…

  50. #448685
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:02 am, navywife91 said:

    So because he made an “error” that gives Palin-McCain the right to lie that he was talking about her? (And the only error is that it allows Palin-McCain to lie!)

    That is politics, as you liberals always like to point out. It’s up to us to decide whether he was talking about Palin or not. By the way, I think this is such a small deal for you to complain about considering the lies being perpetrated by the left with regards to Sarah Palin and her children. You’ll say that the campaign didn’t have anything to do with that, but check the threads after Palin was announced and see how some of those rumors were traced back to an official Obama site, not to mention contantly being repeated by his supporters and the media.

  51. #448686
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:03 am, mchristian said:

    lgm said: This video is a lie

    You mean the media put out things that aren’t true? You can see and hear what Senator Obama said. I don’t presume to know what he meant, but the audience certainly seemed to be in on the joke and it didn’t seem to be about Senator McCain’s policies.

  52. #448687
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:03 am, iamsaved said:

    If this keeps up I can see Hillary and Bill smiling and saying “I told you so”.

    Now all we need is for Obama to pull a McGovern/Eagleton and unselect Joe Biden as his running mate.

    Two of his biggest mistakes – not selecting Hilary as his VP and then selecting Joe “the mouth” Biden – Now that was putting spats on a pig…

  53. #448690
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:04 am, BemusedLib said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:01 am, sonofdy said:

    Again, the McCain campaign diverts attention from its support of a failed republican agenda with a manufactured smear. If possible, they’ll go the entire campaign and never engage on anything of substance.

    Substance like Palin banning books that didn’t exist yet? Or perhaps substance like her husband fathering her son with her daughter? That sort of substance?

    Substance like Palin being the earmark snopw queen.

    Substance like McCain being wrong on the war, many times.

    Substance like more red ink in the deficit and more tax cuts targeted to high income brakcets and large corporations while the middle class loses even more ground.

    Substance like lack of a health care policy.

    And so on…

  54. #448692
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:05 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    By the way, I think this is such a small deal for you to complain about considering the lies being perpetrated by the left with regards to Sarah Palin and her children. You’ll say that the campaign didn’t have anything to do with that, but check the threads after Palin was announced and see how some of those rumors were traced back to an official Obama site, not to mention contantly being repeated by his supporters and the media.

    You need to back this up. An official Obama site? What are you talking about?

  55. #448694
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:05 am, Sniper One said:

    Again, the McCain campaign diverts attention from its support of a failed republican agenda with a manufactured smear. If possible, they’ll go the entire campaign and never engage on anything of substance.

    Excellent tactics. And revealing.

    Wow, Obama must be real desperate if he’s trying to hijack threads on blogs… wow…

    Weak Tactics, and revealing…

  56. #448695
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:06 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:46 am, lgm said:
    The screen says “Obama on Palin”, but Obama was talking about McCain policies, not McCain personally and certainly not Palin.

    Okay, I agree with lgm (and it may not happen again). Lipstick on a pig is a saying. I don’t believe Obambi was talking about Palin or even making that reference. I hate the idea of defending Obambi or lgm but, if you put lipstick on a pig, it is still a pig. That saying has been around long before Palin in politics.

    As for the rest of lgm’s post – he tried. Don’t even try the deficit crap on me if you cashed both of the checks Bush sent you.

  57. #448699
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:08 am, Truesoldier said:

    Did you all see that newsbusters is reporting that he may have plagiarized a political cartoon from the 5th of Sep in that same speech.

  58. #448701
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:08 am, Flyoverman said:


    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:57 am, BemusedLib said:
    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:55 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    Remember when the “politically correct” Left piled on Trent Lott for trying to say something nice about a 90 year old man retiring from the Senate? Was that fair, especially when the senior Democratic Senator is a former memeber of the KKK?

    That leftist game has gone on for years.

    Well, as I mentioned in an earlier post. Your side made the rules. We are playing the game. Next time you are tempted to lie and to pile on someone for an innocent or ill-advised comment, you might think twice.

    Unfair? Probably, but fair is not in your rule book.

  59. #448702
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:10 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    “SEXISM IS OKAY: If you’re a Democrat”

    –Lame Stream Media Rule #123 A, Sub-chapter B

    :shock:

  60. #448703
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:10 am, mchristian said:

    BemusedLib said: Again, the McCain campaign diverts attention

    If you shoot yourself in the foot, as Senator Obama has, it’s better to bandage the wound than deny its existence.

  61. #448704
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:11 am, Member-VRWC said:

    If Obama’s team continues to harp on the “lipstick” theme, then it may be necessary to respond to it.

    If Obama’s was a one-time comment, McCain’s team should ignore it. He’s got deniability (and he’s already done that) that this was an attack on Gov. Palin since this was subtle and hidden within a statement that people use all the time even though we all know that it was an attack. Instead, focus on more substantial matters — Obama’s association with Rezko, Ayers, Wright, and others, his relationship with ACORN, his positions on real issues and how he has reversed them over the last few months (His real version of change? How are we ever to know what he really believes about anything?), and outright lies related to Gov. Palin.

    McCain’s team should be seen as the group focusing on things that matter; leave the trivialities to Obama’s. Let the Democrats be seen for who and what they are — the party of juveniles, completely unqualified to lead.

    Besides, the Hockey Mom is tough enough to handle anything wimps like Obama and Biden can dish out. When the time comes she will have them begging for mercy.

  62. #448705
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:11 am, JDinTX said:

    Obama knew exactly what he was saying and it was a slap at Palin. He can’t argue the issues without his teleprompter, but he does know how to speak to the public. He got his slap in just as he wanted to do. That is one of the things community organizers do. I,m sure Hillary is counting down to 2012.

  63. #448707
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:11 am, sonofdy said:

    Substance like Palin being the earmark snopw queen.

    Palin was not in congress.

    Substance like McCain being wrong on the war, many times.

    As was Obama. A null point.

    So the Palins reproductive organs are now no longer an issue? WOW better tell your buddies.

  64. #448708
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:12 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:57 am, BemusedLib said:
    Again, the McCain campaign diverts attention from its support of a failed republican agenda with a manufactured smear. If possible, they’ll go the entire campaign and never engage on anything of substance.

    Excellent tactics. And revealing.

    It has been said that libs don’t do well on defense… and I have to concur.

    It’s killin’ you libs and I’m lovin’ it!

    Wait’ll debates.

  65. #448709
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:12 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:04 am, BemusedLib said:

    Substance like Palin being the earmark snopw queen.

    The leading pork spenders are Democrats.

    Substance like McCain being wrong on the war, many times.

    Really? We heard grom the Dimocraps the surge would not work and it did.

    Substance like more red ink in the deficit and more tax cuts targeted to high income brakcets and large corporations while the middle class loses even more ground.

    Cashed both of your checks from Bush didn’t you? From what I have seen, the middle class is going to get hit with higher taxes under Obambi.

    Don’t ever let facts get in your way.

  66. #448710
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:13 am, PKAmmoTroop said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:46 am, lgm said:

    The screen says “Obama on Palin”, but Obama was talking about McCain policies, not McCain personally and certainly not Palin.

    Sorry, but the question we were looking for is “What is a Freudian slip?”

    Obama was talking about McCain and what McCain was saying, not about the policies themselves. Since his context was talking about personalities rather than policy this truly was a direct insult.

  67. #448713
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:13 am, jsr said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:55 am, Red State Skeptic said:
    So because he made an “error” that gives Palin-McCain the right to lie that he was talking about her?

    They gave Republicans an opportunity and they would be foolish not to use it to their advantage. I suppose you believe Democrats don’t take words out of context and use every gaffe made be Republicans to destroy them? They created this game and have used it mercilessly for the past 40 years to smear their opponents in ways far worse than this. If you don’t believe it you haven’t been following politics very long or in much depth. Go back to your liberal la-la land and continue with your dreams for a world filled with love and harmony where we can all just get along..

  68. #448714
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:13 am, Sniper One said:

    Substance like McCain being wrong on the war, many times.

    Even your buddy Obama has said that the surge has worked beyond any expectations. So I guess that means was actually RIGHT on the war… many times. Seems to me that we’ve turned over at least one more province to the Iraqi’s in the last 30 days, and we are talking about further troop reductions.

    So… not much of a talking point there…

  69. #448715
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:14 am, stevevvs said:

    BORDERS, LANGUAGE, CULTURE, The RULE OF LAW, SOVEREIGNTY, The CONSTITUTION. Those are my concerns, what are yours?

    McCain is a disaster.

  70. #448716
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:15 am, Misscheryl said:

    Obama’s lipstick comment was classless thuggary straight from a Chicago gutter.

  71. #448718
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:15 am, PKAmmoTroop said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:08 am, Truesoldier said:

    Did you all see that newsbusters is reporting that he may have plagiarized a political cartoon from the 5th of Sep in that same speech.

    Proof Positive that Biden is now writing Obama’s material.

    Day-umn! but it must be embarrassing to be a leftist now… I mean so embarrassing that even they would notice it.

  72. #448720
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:15 am, guitarplayer said:

    Substance like McCain being wrong on the war, many times.

    McCain’s not the one that had to sanitize his website when giving his thoughts on the surge.

  73. #448721
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:16 am, ajmontana said:

    He said it and he meant it directed at Palin and it was a bad move, everything is thought out according to lgm’s posts in the past explaining all his ums and er’s why would this be different? lol what a crapweasel.
    let the debates begin!!

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    Image: the only gear left on the obama bus is reverse. 8)

  74. #448723
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:17 am, Sea_Dog said:

    It seems to me that the Obamamessiah is seeing his golden parachute slipping away and he is panicking. Neither he nor Michelle have held ‘real’ jobs, ones that you were expected to produce something, and doesn’t that lifetime retirement salary of POTUS sound enticing? What is it exactly that Michelle does to warrant a salary even with most CEO’s of multi-national companies? And how convenient that she got a 200% raise when Barack got the earmark for her hospital pushed through. Me thinks something is rotten in Denmark!

  75. #448725
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:18 am, rusty_armor said:

    I am not so inclined to believe that Obama’s lipstick comment was just a gaffe.

    It was deliberate and they were waaaay to ready with a defense of it.

  76. #448726
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:18 am, Socky said:

    McCain said used the same expression last year about Hillary’s health care proposal.

    Did he say it a week after Hillary described herself as a pit bull with lipstick? Did McCain have a history of childish insults, like giving Hillary the finger while pretending not to?

    It’s the context, stupid.

  77. #448729
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:19 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    I suppose you believe Democrats don’t take words out of context and use every gaffe made be Republicans to destroy them? They created this game and have used it mercilessly for the past 40 years to smear their opponents in ways far worse than this.

    This is incredible! You realize that going back 40 years includes Richard Nixon. Do Republicans have to suffer for his tactics? 40 years also includes all of Karl Rove, who spread rumors that an Alabama judge with a children’s charity was a pedophile, that Ann Richards was a lesbian, and that John McCain’s own adopted daughter was a love child with a black woman! Does that mean Sarah Palin deserves the smears she has experienced (none actually coming from the Obama campaign)?

  78. #448731
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:20 am, Misscheryl said:

    I don’t want Obama to be beat by just a small margin. I want him to be beat so badly he’ll never want to subject this fragile ego to that sort of smack down again and we and his party will be done with him forever more

  79. #448732
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:20 am, John Deaux said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:46 am, lgm said:
    Regulators sat on their (chairs) while predatory lending created the subprime fiasco that is taking down one financial institution after another.

    Predatory lending? You mean like lying about your income? Agreeing to payments that are higher than your income? Walking away from a house that is worth less than you paid for it?

    Exactly what part of that is predatory? Do you even think about what you say or do you just accept the Democratic Party’s talking points without any consideration?

    By the way, that’s actually a serious question. I would like to know if you have reasoned this out at all and if so, how you can discount the above points.

  80. #448734
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:21 am, Socky said:

    So, Obama, who gave out three-quarters of a billion dollars in earmarks, including payoffs to the hospital that employed his wife and his political allies in Chicago, is going to go after Palin?

  81. #448736
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:21 am, englishqueen01 said:

    BORDERS, LANGUAGE, CULTURE, The RULE OF LAW, SOVEREIGNTY, The CONSTITUTION. Those are my concerns, what are yours?

    McCain is a disaster.

    I understand your concerns – but do you think in any way Obama’s going to do anything to address your concerns?

    McCain was considering a pro-abortion VP. We protested – he listened.

    It should be alarmingly clear to anyone paying attention to the treatment of Sarah Palin that Obama’s folks don’t give a sh*t about us conservatives, and will treat us like crap under an Obama administration…

    McCain’s not perfect. Palin’s a major plus to his campaign. And until we really overthrow this two-party system, we have to vote for what’s best.

    That happens to be McCain.

  82. #448739
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:23 am, jangar said:

    lgm said:

    Unemployment is at a new high.

    Isn’t that what the Democrats want? More on welfare? You would think they would be happy about that. I guess it depends on ‘who’ is unemployed during ‘which’ election cycle.

  83. #448740
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:23 am, DBNinKY said:

    Although decidedly non-scientific, here’s what “clinging,” rural Democrat voters think of Obama/Biden – love it!

  84. #448741
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:23 am, Socky said:

    40 years also includes all of Karl Rove, who spread rumors that an Alabama judge with a children’s charity was a pedophile, that Ann Richards was a lesbian, and that John McCain’s own adopted daughter was a love child with a black woman!

    Do you also believe that Jerry Mathers died in Vietnam, or are you selective about which urban legends you buy into?

    Do us all a favor and chow down on Mountain Dew and Pop Rocks. Because, you know, that’s what killed ‘Mikey’ from the Life cereal commercials.

  85. #448742
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:23 am, englishqueen01 said:

    Do Republicans have to suffer for his tactics?

    Nixon’s dead, dude. Time to move up to the 21st century.

    Does that mean Sarah Palin deserves the smears she has experienced (none actually coming from the Obama campaign)?

    If you believe the Obama campaign doesn’t silently condone those smears, you need help.

  86. #448744
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:24 am, CCM said:

    Instead of the final word “Yes”, It should read “Pig”.

  87. #448745
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:24 am, willie peter said:

    Zero seems to be accumulating a significant amount of baggage in terms of him relating to the opposite sex.

    And there certainly have been a number of other indications.

    My Gaydar is beginning to sound off.

    Yeah, I know wife and kids.

    But then again, so has Larry Craig.

  88. #448749
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:25 am, Goldwater Knight said:

    This is incredible! You realize that going back 40 years includes Richard Nixon.

    Someone at the office told me it was just a matter ot time before they dug ol’ Trick Dicky again.

  89. #448750
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:25 am, nyc123me said:

    I went to see ‘Spamalot’ at the Sam S Shubert theatre in Manhattan last night, and at one point ‘King Arthur’ made an analogy to ‘Palin’s fake glasses’. That was a new one to me.

  90. #448751
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:25 am, Chesapeaekegal said:

    You know he then goes into an example of fish stinking after being wrapped in paper for several days…the Palin family has had a commercial fishing business all their lives. I don’t think that reference is as obnoxious as the inference that Sarah Palin is a pig. But just maybe it shows that they are in his head and his references are in fact being influenced by what he knows about them and therefore I do think he was hoping that everyone would pick up the smear.

  91. #448752
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:25 am, bluesoc said:

    You know our political discourse is in a sad state when we’re contemplating the meaning of a “botched lipstick joke”.

  92. #448754
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:26 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    McCain was considering a pro-abortion VP. We protested – he listened.

    McCain was considering a pro-abortion VP. We protested said we wouldn’t vote for him – he

    listened

    caved.

    John McCain’s true colors show only when he isn’t running for elected office. 1998: says Roe should not be reversed. 2006: says Alito was too conservative for the Supreme Court.

    Yes, he’s to the right of Obama, but y’all can’t seriously believe he isn’t the same John McCain just because he picked Sarah Palin.

  93. #448758
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:28 am, Socky said:

    Unemployment is at a new high.

    And Obama’s plan to raise taxes on companies that provide jobs for people fixes this how?

    And Obama’s plan to enact Draconian greenhouse gas regulations on industry helps this, how?

    And Obama’s ‘conservation only’ energy policy helps this how. In case you haven’t notice, the increase in unemployment has tracked closely to the decline in domestic energy consumption.

    I think the McPalin plan to expand domestic energy production will create thousands and thousands of new private sector jobs, both directly and indirectly.

    Much better than borrowing money from China to employ more ‘community orgaznizers.’

  94. #448760
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:29 am, Rob said:

    You know our political discourse is in a sad state when we’re contemplating the meaning of a “botched lipstick joke”.

    ANYTHING to keep that Dope with Hope from being elected is okay by me.

  95. #448761
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:29 am, Socky said:

    Does that mean Sarah Palin deserves the smears she has experienced (none actually coming from the Obama campaign)?

    The Obama campaign is joined at the hip with the left-wing media and blogs. Their smears are his smears.

    He is happy to take their support, so he has to take responsibility for their actions.

  96. #448762
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:30 am, conservativesRus said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 9:57 am, BemusedLib said:

    Again, the McCain campaign diverts attention from its support of a failed republican agenda with a manufactured smear. If possible, they’ll go the entire campaign and never engage on anything of substance.

    OK – let’s talk substance. Socialism has never worked. BHO wants socialism
    Abortion kills babies. BHO wants abortion.
    The constitution is a fantastic foundation upon which this country was built. Shall we throw it out or change it now?
    You mean those kind of issues?

  97. #448764
    On September 10th, 2008 at 10:30 am, Marshall Russ said:

    Some commentators this morning are saying that we should give Obambi the benefit of the doubt. I don’t. He knew exactly what he was saying. It was premeditated and calculated. He is mad at the way he has been thrown off his game by and this is part of his tantrum. He has sent an army of paratrooper lawyers to Alaska to dig dirt on Sara Palin because he believes she has done something she needs to hide. Give him the benefit of the doubt at your own peril.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The indelible whiteness of MSNBC

November 23, 2009 05:07 AM by Michelle Malkin

107 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Palin-bashers of pallor.

Emetic of the day

November 19, 2009 01:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

93 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“You guys make a pretty good photo op.”

How do you say “You lie!” in Mandarin?

November 18, 2009 09:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

Obama’s double-talk on dissent.

Cartoon of the day

November 16, 2009 10:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Rear-ended.

Who’s afraid of conservative American women?

November 16, 2009 11:17 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“Extreme” in a skirt.

President O-bow-ma

November 14, 2009 09:34 PM by Michelle Malkin

184 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Downward dog.


Categories: Barack Obama, Sarah Palin



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook