Oh, nooooo, they never meant to liken Palin to a pig

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 10, 2008 01:30 PM

Seeing is believing. Captured the screenshot before it gets taken down:

Posted in: Sarah Palin

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. The Dan Lee Report » Blog Archive » It’s never Barack Obama’s fault. He’s not a man of “Personal Responsibility”.
  2. Text, subtext, context | Cold Fury
  3. FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog
  4. Hang Right Politics » OBAMA IS NOT BEING “SWIFTBOATED”, HE IS BEING “SWIFTBOOTED”
  5. “McCain’s selection of Palin is lipstick on a pig.” « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
  6. The Original Democratic Party Post - “Lipstick On A Pig” Complete Page : BigMouthFrog
  7. Palin vs Obama, huh? Oink…more pork and lipstick, please! The man is becoming a trainwreck. Update « Mcnorman’s Weblog
  8. Once Upon A Time…….. - Black Bear Blog - Black Bear Blog - The Politics of Hunting, Fishing and the Outdoors. Protecting our American Heritage.
  9. FreeSpeech.com » Blog Archives » Pig-gate: Case closed. It was deliberate.
  10. » Wednesday’s Music Nobody’s Ever Heard Of… A Liberated Mind
  11. Obama: Palin a Pig in Lipstick? « Sooshi Soo
  12. Rightjab » Blog Archive » Not sorry
  13. The Wheels Continue to Come Off : Ft. Hard Knox
  14. Obama it’s not your “Lipstick Joke” It’s your “Audacity of Denial” « Riggword Weblog
  15. The Write Side of My Brain » Lipstickgate: Barry O gets snippy about it
  16. The Rude News » Blog Archive » Tidbits & Scraps
  17. On Pigs, Lipstick, Fish, And The Middle Finger « Quipster
  18. Is Obama dumb or does he just play dumb when it suits him? | The College Politico
  19. The Rude News » Blog Archive » The View Sucks The Post
  20. The College Politico » Blog Archive » Is Obama dumb or does he just play dumb when it suits him?

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #449411
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:41 pm, jeffjackie said:

    This is no big deal… Just ask know-it-all Allah Paundit (Obama apologist) over at HotAir.

  2. #449412
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:41 pm, abqalan said:

    The real “issue”: Do we want a dangerous socialist in the White House, backed by an out of control Congress? It has been said here that we need to be better than them i.e. honor and such. Ther is NO HONOR in a socialist regime. We need to attack them with everything we can.

  3. #449413
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:41 pm, guitarplayer said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:30 pm, Mookie said:

    Did you watch the clip of McCain doing the same thing? Was he calling Hillary a pig?

    Nope. He was clearly referencing the policy and not Hillary. I don’t think he mentioned Hillary’s name while he was answering the question.

  4. #449418
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:42 pm, kwyoung said:

    Didn’t read through all the comments, maybe somebody already mentioned it, but Ms. Berry is delusional:

    Mainstream Media Bias toward Right-wing Commentators
    By Liz – Sep 8th, 2008 at 9:12 am EDT
    Isn’t it interesting the double-standard that is at work on the mainstream media? Apparently it is not OK to have liberal commentators such as Olbermann and Matthews making their left-wing biased comments and yet mainstream media see no issue will allowing right-wing bigots like Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, Alan Colmes, Brit Hume, Brian Wilson, John Gibson, etc., to continue to spew their right-wing bigoted hatred and biased reporting to American citizens.

    MSNBC DEMOTES KEITH OLBERMANN

    Alan Colmes, right-wing bigot? Clearly she hasn’t watched the show. At least she admits what is blaringly obvious to the rest of us… that PMSNBC commentators are biased.

  5. #449420
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:43 pm, Laree said:

    So they were going with the “pig” insult all along, and nobody thought to tell Obama it wasn’t a good idea after her Hockey Mom,Pit Bull lipstick comment. Got it they are having a failure to communicate.

  6. #449426
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:46 pm, mistressjustice said:

    This is the most idiotic andor disingenuous line of attack I have ever seen. And anyone that pursues it is one of the two. Take your pick.

    They know what they’re doing. I can only hope that it backfires and alienates moderates and idependents.

    1. This victimzation of Sarah Palin can:

    -cost McCain the election. (I hope so.)

    -get enough shrill, close minded women to join the victimation campaign, and help McCain win the campaign.

    -set the spin going for Palin to quit the campaign if a) there’s something really damaging on her out there that can’t be overcome, or b) she proves to not be ready for primetime and becomes a liability.
    She could quit in a teary press conference where she mentions protecting her family 2 dozen times. The repubs will hope the illogical female outrage will cause them to vote against Obama.

    I guess we’ll see how it plays out, but the “gender card” is obviously deliberate in the McCain camp.

    I gotta get back to work, so I won’t be debating further. Peace.

  7. #449427
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:46 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    A man without honor is not fit to be President. I don’t care how long he spent as a POW or in the Senate. He’s proven he has no honor.

    You’ve made it very clear that you don’t support the troops and that you have practically ZERO appreciation for your rights as American as your failed school of ideal thought is protected by millions of American soldiers, 5000+ nukes, the USA nuclear navy and sonar nets.

    And he wants to continue policies economic policies, including massive deficits, that are ruining our economy.

    Regarding the economy, McCain will stimulate growth because he has faith in the market of capitalism. Obama is too heavy on the tax side, mainly because he’s too afraid to say no in spite of being free of “lobbyists.”

  8. #449434
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:48 pm, ajmontana said:

    Maybe Barry O’ was talkin about his own wife! :shock:

    The contrasts of Cindy and Michell O’ are astounding…..

    one bitter, one beautiful inside and out.

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′
    Image: Not only is Obama and empty suit, his luggage is full of incompetence. 8)

  9. #449439
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:49 pm, Rusty said:

    You fools. That page is a compliment to Governor Palin. The McCain campaign is the pig and Governor Palin’s life story is the lipstick.

    Some of you will be glad to know that I’ll mostly be staying away from this site until after the election. I didn’t start reading Michelle Malkin until after 2004, so I didn’t know what she was like come election time.

    She is outrageous, intellectually dishonest, and repeats herself like a broken record. Any outrageous thing said by an individual about Sarah Palin is attributed to liberals. In one case, she refused to provide proof of anything odious being said. And now she’s making up things out of thin air. The phrase “lipstick on a pig,” the same phrase used by John McCain in reference to Hillary Clinton’s policies only a year ago, is not offensive. Only a moron could take offense to it.

    The “good” Michelle Malkin (as opposed to the Evil Malkin of the past few weeks) calls politicians of every stripe (mostly liberals, but conservatives too) on their BS. She brings out stories that don’t get a lot of play. But this is giving muckraking a bad (worse?) name. The stuff on this site is now beyond parody.

    I now wonder if McCain picked Palin just to use the sexist card the first chance he got. Quite a ticket you all have. I am very excited to be back here on this site in November rubbing your noses in your inevitable loss.

  10. #449443
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:51 pm, ajmontana said:

    DLTDHYOTWO rusty.

  11. #449444
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:51 pm, materialist said:

    We seem to have not just a candidate, but a whole political party that doesn’t know a pig from a pit bull. There’s time left before November. Perhaps they will learn.

  12. #449453
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:53 pm, JohnnyNJ said:

    …..”You can take an empty suit community organizer dress it up with an affirmative action east coast liberal elite education and all you have is an arrogant smart-ass empty suit community organizer with a diploma”.

    Johnny NJ

  13. #449457
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:54 pm, Azygos said:

    John and Mookie,
    Your arguments are FOS. You think McCain and Gov Palin read some obscure web page on a democratic site and crafted a speech around it? Do you think if either of you were writing an acceptance speech for the Vice President of the United States you would be perusing blogs that same day while writing and practicing to deliver the most important speech of your life? If you believe that I’ve got some land in Florduh for you.

    B. Hussein Obambi’s remarks directly refer to Gov. Palin as a pig. It is plain and clear to the rest of us what he meant. He can’t be enough of a man as Michelle O and own up to it. I for one would never vote for a sniveling wanker such as B. Hussein Obambi.

  14. #449458
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:54 pm, Rusty said:

    Nope. He was clearly referencing the policy and not Hillary. I don’t think he mentioned Hillary’s name while he was answering the question.

    Wow.

    Are you kidding me?

    Obama never mentioned Palin by name. He prefaced the zinger with a paragraph about McCain’s policies being the same as Bush’s and calling it “change.”

    The intellectual dishonesty on this site is out of control. How can you defend what McCain said and oppose what Obama said WHEN THEY SAID THE SAME EXACT THING!

    Oh, right, the “D” next to Obama’s name. Noted.

  15. #449460
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:55 pm, Rusty said:

    [B. Obama's] remarks directly refer to Gov. Palin as a pig.

    Really? They do? Directly? Show me?

    You baseless liar.

  16. #449471
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:57 pm, Mookie said:

    Your arguments are FOS. You think McCain and Gov Palin read some obscure web page on a democratic site and crafted a speech around it? Do you think if either of you were writing an acceptance speech for the Vice President of the United States you would be perusing blogs that same day while writing and practicing to deliver the most important speech of your life? If you believe that I’ve got some land in Florduh for you.

    What the hell are you talking about? Who said Palin included that line in her speech after seeing it on a blog? Try again.

  17. #449473
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:57 pm, purplepeep said:

    BlameAmericaLast said:
    And yet, almost 50% of the country wants the “Chosen One” elected.

    WAKE UP PEOPLE!

    You have to keep in mind, BALast, that during the primaries the actual votes for Obama were very often less than his predicted poll numbers. In fact, I believe there were at least a couple of states where he led in the polling data but lost to Hillary.

  18. #449477
    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:59 pm, flmom said:

    As my mother used to tell me, if someone tries to make laugh at you, laugh with them. I don’t think he was calling Gov. Palin a pig, rather the policies, it fits in with them trying to tie McCain in with Bush. That said, I do think the lipstick reference was deliberate, he was trying to be clever and funny and he was playing to the audience. The McCain camp should have rose above this one.

  19. #449483
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:00 pm, guitarplayer said:

    Obama never mentioned Palin by name. He prefaced the zinger with a paragraph about McCain’s policies being the same as Bush’s and calling it “change.”

    Slow down there Rusty. I take you got here recently. I was posting earlier that I’m giving Obama the benefit of the doubt on this one. I don’t believe he meant to insult Palin with his pig remark.

    That being said, there are lots of people out there that do believe it was an attack on her. Obama was on TV earlier today and he could’ve just said he was sorry if anyone was offended. That would’ve been the end of the story. The fact that he didn’t is what makes me mad. He’s either too arrogant or too stupid to realize that he offended a lot of people with this remark. That’ll keep this issue going and make sure that the women voters who switched to McCain will not go back to Obama.

  20. #449484
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:00 pm, flmom said:

    correction: tries to laugh

  21. #449485
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:00 pm, atheling said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 2:49 pm, Rusty said:
    Some of you will be glad to know that I’ll mostly be staying away from this site until after the election.

    Hallelujah! Praise God and pass the ammunition!

    One less “outrageous, intellectually dishonest, and repeats himself like a broken record” libtard to listen to.

  22. #449486
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:01 pm, sonofdy said:

    I believe there were at least a couple of states where he led in the polling data but lost to Hillary.

    That was because some people (god knows why?) will say to a pollester that they will vote for Obama because they don’t want to be known as “racist” but when alone in the booth, they for for the other person. There is a name for this but the name escapes me.

  23. #449489
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:02 pm, chapoutier said:

    For all the talk of “The One” and “The Messiah” from the right referring to the left, I have seriously never seen such a bunch of instant “hero” worship and cult of personality surrounding anyone as I have Palin on here. You all should really go back and read some of your comments from the thread during her speech.

    It was like watching a bunch of people at a pentecostal service rolling on the floor and speaking in tongues.

    And, just like any other cult, you all have allowed yourselves to become so perverted by your ecstasy that you either delude yourselves into buying any sort of crap fed to you or purposefully lie in order to further your “cause.”

  24. #449496
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:05 pm, Rob said:

    For all the talk of “The One” and “The Messiah” from the right referring to the left, I have seriously never seen such a bunch of instant “hero” worship and cult of personality surrounding anyone as I have Palin on here.

    ICH BIN EIN PALINER!!!

    GO PALIN, I WORSHIP YOU!

    :o )~

    We Conservatives now have our own hero. We CAN win.

  25. #449498
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:06 pm, Rusty said:

    He’s either too arrogant or too stupid to realize that he offended a lot of people with this remark.

    The people who were offended don’t deserve to be paid attention to.

    And, really, you are worried about offended people? There’s a commenter here who goes by “Sambo.” Should Michelle apologize to every black person every time he leaves a comment because people could be offended?

    Actually, yes she should. The difference being that “sambo” is an actual ethnic slur and that “lipstick on a pig” a common non-derogatory phrase.

  26. #449504
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:07 pm, ajmontana said:

    Yeah chap, a lot of us were rooting for Gov. Palin to be the pick months ago, sorry for our enthusiam at OUR Convention. Go read your fellow KosIte friends comments… lol, what a joke.

  27. #449506
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:07 pm, Mookie said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:02 pm, chapoutier said:

    For all the talk of “The One” and “The Messiah” from the right referring to the left, I have seriously never seen such a bunch of instant “hero” worship and cult of personality surrounding anyone as I have Palin on here. You all should really go back and read some of your comments from the thread during her speech.

    It’ll be interesting to see if she’ll get the same treatment here that McCain received once we find out she supports his amnesty plan.

  28. #449507
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:07 pm, atheling said:

    Chapoutier:

    It isn’t “cult of personality” with Palin because she has actual accomplishments and represents ordinary Americans and our values, unlike your Obamessiah, The Empty Suit. It’s actually becoming painful to listen to the guy stammering without a teleprompter. He makes George Bush sound like Cicero.

    Do you want to do a round of Palin Accomplishments v. Obama ones? Wanna go there?

  29. #449508
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:08 pm, sharrukin said:

    Obama gave Hillary Clinton the one-fingered salute in a frat boy manner. It is how he operates.

    Obama regarding Sarah Palin;
    “I guess she wants to play with the boys”

    Lipstick on a Pig
    By Lynn Ehrlicher aka Lynnie Gal – Sep 7th, 2008 at 1:31 pm EDT over at http://my.barackobama.com
    Screenshot at;
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2078854/posts

    McCain’s Selection of Palin is Lipstick on a Pig over at http://www.democrats.org
    Republicans offer more of the same. Palin is a red herring, lipstick on the Republican pig to distract Americans

    Bob Beckel made a remark about Sarah Palin being a pig on Fox News the other day.

    Beckel says, “I thought she said the difference in her speech, the difference between a socc- or a hockey mom and a Rottweiler was—or maybe it was a pig—was lipstick, right?”

    Rep. Russ Carnahan also took a swipe at Palin.

    “For all his tough talk [McCain] buckled to the right wing of his party in his choice. Picked someone with zero experience in national government, zero experience in foreign affairs. There’s no way you can dress up that record, even with a lot of lipstick,” he said.

    Gee, I wonder who Carnahan is talking about here? Could it be Sarah Palin?

    “What’s the difference between a Hockey Mom and a Pitbull? LIPSTICK!”. Well, are we supposed to believe that Obama and Carnahan aren’t aware of the analogy?

    All of this is just a coincidence?

    Bob Beckel uses the same line as Obama, but of course Obama wasn’t directing it at Palin!

    No frat boys in the White House!

  30. #449509
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:08 pm, sonofdy said:

    The people who were offended don’t deserve to be paid attention to.

    Which is why he stands a good chance of losing this election.

  31. #449510
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:08 pm, chapoutier said:

    Go read your fellow KosIte friends comments… lol, what a joke.

    I personally would not want to compare myself to the Kossites, but whatever floats your boat aj.

  32. #449512
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:09 pm, chapoutier said:

    Do you want to do a round of Palin Accomplishments v. Obama ones? Wanna go there?

    That would be a welcome change from the lying, disingenuous crap that is the subject of this thread.

  33. #449513
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:09 pm, nyk said:

    We must also refrain from referring to attractive women who are into women as “lipstick lesbians” as clearly any reference to that would be some sort of implication that Palin herself is a lesbian, seeing as she has copyrighted the word “lipstick”.

    You forgot to include (TM) after your unlicensed use of the word “lipstick” (TM). Make sure it doesn’t happen again, chap — I’d hate to have to send you a cease and desist letter (but I will. I will).

  34. #449515
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:10 pm, Mookie said:

    Obama regarding Sarah Palin;
    “I guess she wants to play with the boys”

    Link?

  35. #449516
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:11 pm, Rob said:

    The people who were offended don’t deserve to be paid attention to.

    Typical elitist Obama statement…. those stupid people clinging to their offended sensibilities…

  36. #449518
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:12 pm, ajmontana said:

    The flood of tears from the Dems in November will float my boat just fine thank you very much. 8)

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′

  37. #449519
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:13 pm, chapoutier said:

    Typical elitist Obama statement…. those stupid people clinging to their offended sensibilities…

    Fine I am elitist. I am happy to call anyone here that i) believes Obama was calling Palin a pig and ii) at the same time does not believe that McCain was calling Clinton the same thing stupid.

    Stupid.

    Stupid.

    Stupid.

    Or simply lying to score political points.

    Which are you, Rob?

  38. #449520
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:13 pm, wighttrasch said:

    He prefaced the zinger

    It appears our definition of ‘zinger’ varies slightly.

    I wish I could say the same for ‘fools’, ‘liar’, or ‘moron’.
    Oh, and what about the ‘I’m taking my ball & going home’ schtick? You posted, what?, 3 times after saying you were leaving.

  39. #449522
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:14 pm, guitarplayer said:

    The people who were offended don’t deserve to be paid attention to.

    And that’s why he’s losing ground in the polls. Writing off people the way he did is not a good campaign strategy.

  40. #449524
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:14 pm, nyk said:

    That was because some people (god knows why?) will say to a pollester that they will vote for Obama because they don’t want to be known as “racist” but when alone in the booth, they for for the other person. There is a name for this but the name escapes me.

    The Bradley Effect.

    For all the talk of “The One” and “The Messiah” from the right referring to the left, I have seriously never seen such a bunch of instant “hero” worship and cult of personality surrounding anyone as I have Palin on here.

    On the nose. It’s bizarre. Like watching a Shaker convention.

  41. #449525
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:14 pm, Rusty said:

    Geez, Rob. Aren’t conservatives usually the ones decrying political correctness and how easily people are annoyed? Remember when we all had a good laugh over that moron who said the term “black hole” was racist.

    This is no different.

  42. #449529
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:16 pm, Rusty said:

    Wight, I’m calling em as I see them. The people I called liars were lying. And if you’re offended by the phrase “lipstick on a pig,” then you’re a fool and a moron and a sheep who is only offended when told to by by Michelle.

  43. #449533
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:18 pm, ajmontana said:

    LOL, I love seeing the moonbats squirm….

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′

  44. #449537
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:20 pm, nyk said:

    No frat boys in the White House!

    Um…did you miss the 2000 and 2004 elections? Because it’s a little late for that call-to-arms.

  45. #449540
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:20 pm, wighttrasch said:

    You see? That’s where you lot are wrong about the posters in here.

    I’ll type slowly.

    We’re not offended by the statement.

    We are offended by the distortion, misrepresentations & outright lies by those who made the statement(s) and still want us to vote for them come November.

  46. #449544
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:22 pm, docjohn52 said:

    I for one, am really enjoying watching them shooting themselves in the foot.

    Matt Drudge today: “AS THE PRESS TURNS: OBAMA SAYS ‘ENOUGH IS ENOUGH’”

    Hehe! I don’t think so, I think it’s just getting started, O’bamaski.
    Slowly but surely the MSM is starting to feel the bias heat.

    And hilarity ensues!

    (Can one of you photoshop adepts do me a Barracuda in lipstick? And don’t forget the little barracudi… I think it would look good on my desk.

    doc

  47. #449546
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:23 pm, chapoutier said:

    LOL, I love seeing the moonbats squirm….

    And just like your boy, McCain, and hell the Republican Party as a whole for the last 20 years, you are willing to propagate any lie to make it happen apparently.

    Actually, I am sorry to assume you are being disingenuous here. You might be “just that stupid”. Care to clear it up?

  48. #449549
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:23 pm, happy2behere said:

    I don’t assume Obama meant to insult Palin with the pig comments, but I QUESTION HIS JUDGEMENT MAKING THEM. He’s supposed to be such a “smart guy” but I guess he just stepped in the poo by accident.

  49. #449558
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:25 pm, sonofdy said:

    I love the liberals here trying to make something of this after 2 striaght weeks of lies and smears from them. The word HYPOCRITE is just too weak to discribe it.

  50. #449561
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:26 pm, BayStateRepublican said:

    Wow – heat and light like I haven’t seen here in a ‘lil while.

    Palin doesn’t own a trademark on “lipstick” (obviously), but she put it into play in the conversation. Any Obama reference to lipstick in the next few weeks was going to be seen in that frame of reference. Using it in a perjorative in any way related to McCain was political suicide. Issues, no. Traction, yes.

    By the way, it is not becoming when you paint MM’s commenter’s with such a broad brush. You all are much smarter than that.

    BSR

  51. #449562
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:27 pm, ajmontana said:

    I don’t give a flying fig about the Pig comment. clear enough for ya?

    lmao

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′

  52. #449565
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:28 pm, chapoutier said:

    By the way, it is not becoming when you paint MM’s commenter’s with such a broad brush. You all are much smarter than that.

    I am not. I have a clearly defined set of criteria in Post #130 for who I am painting. Unfortunately, that covers most everyone on this thread.

  53. #449566
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:28 pm, guitarplayer said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:26 pm, BayStateRepublican said:

    Palin doesn’t own a trademark on “lipstick” (obviously), but she put it into play in the conversation. Any Obama reference to lipstick in the next few weeks was going to be seen in that frame of reference. Using it in a perjorative in any way related to McCain was political suicide. Issues, no. Traction, yes.

    Nailed it right on the head. Thank you.

  54. #449568
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:28 pm, ajmontana said:

    Bye folks, have things to see places to go, enjoy the Bacon….
    lmao…..

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′

  55. #449569
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:29 pm, Rob said:

    Fine I am elitist. I am happy to call anyone here that i) believes Obama was calling Palin a pig and ii) at the same time does not believe that McCain was calling Clinton the same thing stupid.

    But it doesn’t matter what YOU think the Obamasiah meant with his use of the “p–” word. It matters what we conservatives can convince the undecided voters he meant..

    In the words of that immortal sage, Humpty Dumpty:

    “When I use a word,it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”

  56. #449570
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:29 pm, mistressjustice said:

    And if you’re offended by the phrase “lipstick on a pig,” then you’re a fool and a moron and a sheep who is only offended when told to by by Michelle.

    Yes. Yes. It can’t be said any better than that.

    BTW, sorry to all about the typos in my last post. It’s been crazy busy, but I got sucked into this stupid issue. Sorry about any typos here too. Rusty has nailed it on the head though.
    Rusty, please join me here on election night to gloat and laugh at FoxNews and Malkin worhippers, before a real alcohol filled bash offline.
    I’m out for real now.

    “sheep who is only offended when told to be by Michelle”

    classic

  57. #449574
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:31 pm, purplepeep said:

    Rusty said:
    Obama never mentioned Palin by name.

    Incorrect. After his “botched” pig-Palin joke Obama still kept schlumping through it, according to the AP:

    “In his speech Tuesday, Obama followed up the comments by saying that Palin’s is an interesting story, drawing boos at the mention of her name and trying to cut them off.

    “Look, she’s new, she hasn’t been on the scene, she’s got five kids”

    Every news article I’ve read notes that the audience made the immediate connection with Palin when he delivered his hilarious botched joke. Also note in the video they start guffawing at the Dem’s “lipstick” Palin reference when he had just started the line.

    Of course, you could argue that’s because Obama is even slower than his followers, but I don’t know that ya really wanna go there.

    How can you defend what McCain said and oppose what Obama said WHEN THEY SAID THE SAME EXACT THING!

    Par for your relativistic course, Rusty, but a dishonest argument. Who was self-identified with lipstick jokes in an extremely public venue, watched by record millions, just days before McCain “SAID THE EXACT SAME THING”?

    The bottom line: Obama stepped in it in a major way. Americans didn’t like it, and it’ll cost him even more votes. If he were to honestly and humbly apologize it might help slow his dropping poll numbers , but he really took careful aim and opened both barrels at his toes with this one.

  58. #449576
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:31 pm, chapoutier said:

    It matters what we conservatives can convince the undecided voters he meant..

    Exactly, and you are willing to lie and obfuscate and engage in blatant double standards to do so. I am sure your momma would be proud.

  59. #449580
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:34 pm, Rob said:

    And just like your boy, McCain, and hell the Republican Party as a whole for the last 20 years, you are willing to propagate any lie to make it happen apparently.

    To defeat the false prophet, the black hole, the Dope with Hope, we will do what it takes.

    In the words of that immortal satirist, Jean Paul Satre:

    “By any means necessary.”

  60. #449585
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:36 pm, chapoutier said:

    I give you credit for at least admitting to being scum Rob.

  61. #449587
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:38 pm, desertdweller said:

    Slow down there Rusty. I take you got here recently. I was posting earlier that I’m giving Obama the benefit of the doubt on this one. I don’t believe he meant to insult Palin with his pig remark.

    Right on target, guitarplayer.

    But Obama, while not deliberately insulting Palin (unlike flipping the bird to Hillary) surely knew there’d be an association drawn between Sarah Palin’s lipstick remark and his. THEN he follows it up with the “old fish” line.

    He’s either incredibly naive (disqualifying him) or just plain dumb (disqualifying him). Either way, he’s screwed.

  62. #449589
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:40 pm, sergeantmajorbill said:

    The only person who really knows what he meant is Obama. The only problem with that is that half of the time he doesn’t even know what he meant. (How many times have we heard “what I really meant was….”)? What I also find unusual is that O’Reilly spent most of his show this morning saying Obama was not referring to Palin. I find this unusual because his normal retort would be that he does not know what he meant because he can’t get inside of his head. Funny he managed to get inside of his head this time.

  63. #449590
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:41 pm, L.N. Smithee said:

    Rusty wrote:

    The people who were offended don’t deserve to be paid attention to.

    Too bad for Obama people vote regardless of whether he pays attention to them. So much for Mr. Purple States of America.

    We’ve put down a door stop so it won’t hit you where the Good Lord split you. Why are you still here????

  64. #449592
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:43 pm, purplepeep said:

    Rusty said:
    if you’re offended by the phrase “lipstick on a pig,”

    I’m not offended at all, more like thrilled that Obama is the “gaffe that keeps on gaffing”. He thought he could get away with a too-cute-by-half cheap shot but got called on the carpet for it instead. As they say, “ya makes yer bets and ya takes yer chances”. In this case Obama just bet wrong.

    But on the positive side you should be very relieved that he hasn’t let loose with a “Dean Scream”. Yet.

  65. #449593
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:44 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Texas Darlin is a PUMA Democrat.

    Check this out.

    I love it!

  66. #449596
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:47 pm, docjohn52 said:

    Way to go…

    You crashed the server!

    hehe!

  67. #449598
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:47 pm, Rob said:

    O’Reilly spent most of his show this morning saying Obama was not referring to Palin

    I stopped watching Bill O. He seems to have lost his way and just says foolish things now.

    Why republitards want to keep defending Obama is beyond me.

  68. #449601
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:49 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Just posted on Drudge. This race is going to be over in a week, if the Dems don’t shut up.

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/0908/SC_Dem_chair_Palin_primary_qualification_is_she_hasnt_had_an_abortion_.html?showall

  69. #449610
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:52 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Did Barack Obama put lipstick on William Ayers?

    During his fugitive years, Mr. Ayers said, he lived in 15 states, taking names of dead babies in cemeteries who were born in the same year as he. He describes the typical safe house: there were usually books by Malcolm X and Ho Chi Minh, and Che Guevara’s picture in the bedroom; fermented Vietnamese fish sauce in the refrigerator, and live sourdough starter donated by a Native American that was reputed to have passed from hand to hand over a century.

    He also writes about the Weathermen’s sexual experimentation as they tried to ‘’smash monogamy.” The Weathermen were ”an army of lovers,” he says, and describes having had different sexual partners, including his best male friend.

    In other news:

    Wednesday, September 10, 2008
    Obama camp puts Larry Sinclair on Secret Service Watch

  70. #449620
    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:58 pm, mattymatt10 said:

    I’m reminded of a quote from John Adams in the musical 1776, when they were debating the Declaration of Independence. “This is a REVOLUTION dammit!! We’re gonna have to offend somebody!!”

    FauxBama was speaking to his supporters. He used a phrase that his supporters would agree with. Obviously, the other side takes offense. It happens constantly, by both sides. Was it intentional? I’d have to think it depends on which side you’re coming at it from. I just don’t think it’s worth all the energy being expended on it.

    Seriously, what the hell good is free speech if you can’t offend anyone?

  71. #449630
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:00 pm, OneofThem said:

    They’re likening McCain to a pig, not Palin. Not that that makes it any less offensive.

  72. #449636
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:03 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:00 pm, OneofThem said:

    They’re likening McCain to a pig, not Palin. Not that that makes it any less offensive.

    Ok then, if we accept that hypothesis,
    then this should be OK with them.

  73. #449646
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:07 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    From Texas Darlin’s comments:

    You can call a donkey “messiah”
    but it’s still a jackass.

  74. #449652
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:10 pm, Rob said:

    I just don’t think it’s worth all the energy being expended on it.

    It just gives us a chance to feel involved in a race where the candidates don’t really give a crap about us at all…

  75. #449655
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:10 pm, Zheldon said:

    O.K. How does this sound. Maybe, just maybe, Obama did not mean that to be directed at Palin. It does appear that his audience interpreted it to be directed at Palin.

  76. #449658
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:11 pm, L.N. Smithee said:

    Obama’s a hypocrite, and you know it.

    Once he won the Iowa caucuses, he’s been priming the nation to believe that if he got seriously challenged, it would be due to racism. Remember that part of his stump speech in which he says “They want to scare you about Barack…” At first, he said his opponents would say, “Did I mention he’s black?” Then he modified the line, saying “He’s not like the Presidents on those dollar bills.”

    Think that wasn’t about race? You don’t have to believe me, but you do have to believe Obama’s campaign director.

    Obama Strategist Calls McCain’s Attack Ad Insulting; McCain Camp Defends It

    By MARK MOONEY
    Aug. 1, 2008—

    Sen. Barack Obama’s chief strategist conceded that the Democratic presidential candidate was referring to his race when he said Republicans were trying to scare voters by suggesting Obama “doesn’t look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills.”

    The comment had triggered a charge Thursday from Sen. John McCain’s campaign manager that Obama had “played the race card… from the bottom of the deck.”

    Playing the Race Card

    Obama’s camp initially denied the remark was a reference to Obama’s race.

    Obama is poised to become the first black man to be the presidential nominee of a major political party when he claims the Democratic nomination on Aug. 28 — the 45th anniversary of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech.

    “He was referring to the fact that he didn’t come into the race with the history of others,” Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs said Thursday. “It is not about race.”

    But Obama’s chief strategist, David Axelrod, acknowledged on “Good Morning America” Friday that the candidate was referring, at least in part, to his ethnic background.

    When pressed to explain the comment, Axelrod told “GMA” it meant, “He’s not from central casting when it comes to candidates for president of the United States. He’s new to Washington. Yes, he’s African-American.” [...]

    Rusty, MistressJustice, all you guys know it’s true: If Palin had said in her RNCC speech “Let’s call a spade a spade,” there’s no way you would have perceived it as innocent. In fact, you would have gone (ahem) hog wild.

    BTW – where were you guys when Obama’s camp stood idly by while TPM, Bill Press, Bob Herbert and Keith Olbermann accused the McCain camp of trying to activate latent racism with subliminal images suggesting Obama was going to bonk all their daughters?

  77. #449662
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:13 pm, airbrush101 said:

    If anybody didn’t call him on this then the next sppech would have been..”You can put lipstick, glasses and a pearl necklace on a pig but …..ect”

  78. #449665
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:14 pm, sharrukin said:

    Obama likes to get his digs in with plausible deniability.

    Hey it could have been a mistake? Right!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoOFp-RDpvM

    Or maybe not!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zhkq11UExcw

    Cowardly and juvenile! Yes.

    Presidential? No.

  79. #449683
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:18 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    This is like really weird – the people who want to give us and old dumb guy and a hockey mom are trying to act like they are all bent out of shape over a cliché.

    Besides – the lady really isn’t much to rally around (no family values = 5 kids, 100 hour a week job).

  80. #449691
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:22 pm, flmom said:

    #172

    I think everyone is enjoying watching Obama shoot himself in the foot, time after time after time….

  81. #449697
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:24 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:18 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    the lady really isn’t much to rally around (no family values = 5 kids, 100 hour a week job).

    Why are you picking on Nancy Pelosi?
    ;-)

  82. #449698
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:24 pm, wckelly60 said:

    The Obama campaign self-destructs. Film at 11.

    What’s the word… you know… the term that describes pleasure at other’s distress? Shadenfreude?

    McCain-Palin… landslide

  83. #449703
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:27 pm, L.N. Smithee said:

    Ilovemycountry wrote:

    Besides – the lady really isn’t much to rally around (no family values = 5 kids, 100 hour a week job).

    Uh huh. And only a lady can raise children, right, Ilovemycountry? Well, it’s so nice to see that Democratic women are coming around to realize Archie Bunker was right!

  84. #449715
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:31 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:18 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    This is like really weird – the people who want to give us and old dumb guy and a hockey mom are trying to act like they are all bent out of shape over a cliché.

    Get over it – he called a beautiful mother of 5, and the Governor of the largest state in the union a pig.

    There was no misunderstanding, he did it on purpose trying to score points with the Obamatrons. He acted childishly and foolishly. I’ll guarantee he adlibed that line too because if his speech writer had put it in the writer would have been fired. You don’t give your opponent an opportunity like this.

    Face it, Obama just lost the election. The only hope the leftists have now is that Hillary’s PUMAs can get that restraining order they’ve petitioned for enacted and get the DNC to yank him off the ballot.

  85. #449722
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:34 pm, L.N. Smithee said:

    Ilovemycountry wrote:

    This is like really weird – the people who want to give us and (sic) old dumb guy and a hockey mom are trying to act like they are all bent out of shape over a cliché.

    What’s the alternative? A “community organizer” and an old dumb guy!

  86. #449725
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:36 pm, Rob said:

    What’s the alternative? A “community organizer” and an old dumb guy!

    community organizer = rabble rouser that wants my tax money for the losers that don’t work.

  87. #449730
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:37 pm, John Ansell said:

    Now if Obama said you could put mascara on a moose and it’s still a moose, I’d buy in that he was attacking Palin.

  88. #449735
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:38 pm, John Ansell said:

    community organizer = rabble rouser that wants my tax money for the losers that don’t work.

    :lol: you nailed it. :lol:

  89. #449736
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:38 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    Rusty since you posted that you aren’t going to post anymore until after the election, how about not coming back and take MJ, and LGM with you.

    That would only improve the quality of this site….hehehe!

  90. #449739
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:39 pm, Jerry said:

    Keep drinking the kool aid Rusty, it warms my heart to see a libby get so upset he would register on a journalist’s blog just to vent there own ineptitude. Michelle and Fox actually care about accuracy and integrity in what they write, show, and and say. Why don’t you go back to your tingley leg heros at pmsnbc and hate America with all your other nut jobs. I have been reading Michelle for years because she is good at what she does, and she always has been. Election time or not. Your comments show you to be a fraud if you think Michelle has changed for election politics. Get a clue and stop droppin glue bud.

  91. #449740
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:40 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 3:14 pm, Rusty said:

    It’s seldom I ever agree with Rusty, but I said the same thing earlier (you must not have seen it Rusty, I even referred to the ridiculous “black hole” racist nonsense). I hate the thin skinned PC crowd. And that is what I feel like this is all about.The whole thig is silly.

  92. #449744
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:42 pm, rightside said:

    Wow, so many trolls here today!

    The liberals’ ship is sinking quickly, and now watch as the rats scurry off it. Perhaps affirmative action wasn’t the best method of choosing a presidential candidate. *smirk*

    Sarah Palin is pro-choice… She chose life each time!

    GOP: Raising babies and Killing Taxes!
    DEMS: Well, you get it.

  93. #449746
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:42 pm, Zheldon said:

    I do not think it is thin skinned. I believe people are getting tired of the double standard.

    Had Palin said something that could have been a sexist or racist jab to Obama then the left and the media would be nuts.

  94. #449750
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:45 pm, LuxEternam said:

    Rusty said:

    Really? They do? Directly? Show me?

    You baseless liar.

    Rusty…if you watched the video at all you saw the reaction to the crowd as Obama says the first part of the line, that they CLEARLY are reacting to it as if it is a jab at Palin. Whether you agree or not whether it was intentional, the crowd obviously takes it that way. As has a huge portion of the viewing public. Your anger about this is reflective of the Democrats anger at the fact that they are getting decimated in the polls, and are flailing like crazy at Palin to try an make anything stick.

    The more they flail, the more desperate they get. Even the AP said the connection was clear before the Obama camp got ahold of them and made tehm change the story.

    From Nedral Pickler AP stringer:

    “You can put lipstick on a pig,” he said to an outbreak of laughter, shouts and raucous applause from his audience, clearly drawing a connection to Palin’s joke even if it’s not what Obama meant. “It’s still a pig.”

    Now it is strangly absent from all AP stories now

  95. #449752
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:46 pm, LuxEternam said:

    And Rusty….please…leave already.

  96. #449754
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:47 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:42 pm, Zheldon said:

    Hey, you don’t have to convince me of that. The double standard is outrageous (hence why I sooo oppose AA and the constant race baiters out there). I am really really really tired of the PC garbage that says nobody can be offended. Especially when it takes a complete suspension of reality to see the offense.

  97. #449755
    On September 10th, 2008 at 4:48 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    This will probably come as a surprise to all of you, but the world is actually round and the tooth fairy is imaginary.

    Here a question: how come people who graduated from college and higher, love Obama and people who cook moonshine love Palin?

You must be logged in to post a comment.




HotAir GreenRoom