Michelle Malkin » ABC News blows it

ABC News blows it

By Michelle Malkin • September 11, 2008 06:46 PM

Scroll for updates…Is ABC doing some West Coast whitewashing?…Wow, Even the LA Times sees Gibson’s distortion…

Charlie Gibson had a chance to show that he could be fair, balanced, and P.D.S.-free with Sarah Palin’s first major MSM interview.

Looks like he blew it.

Taking quotes out of context.

Getting basic facts wrong.

Engaging in distortionary hype.

And the reason we should watch the rest of this hatchet job is…what exactly?

Also: Guess this is good preparation for the kind of neutral, objective questions we’ll get during the debates.

***

Interview excerpts here.

This is how Yahoo! News is promoting the interview:

GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, “Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.” Are we fighting a holy war?

PALIN: You know, I don’t know if that was my exact quote.

GIBSON: Exact words.

PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln’s words when he said — first, he suggested never presume to know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will or to speak God’s words.

But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God’s side.

That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie.

GIBSON: I take your point about Lincoln’s words, but you went on and said, “There is a plan and it is God’s plan.”

What she actually said:

“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”

Allahpundit rips Gibson:

Totally untrue, but that’s what he gets for relying on the Associated Press, which took the liberty of bowdlerizing her quote mid-sentence in order to make it fit the narrative they were trying to build of her as some fundie who thinks she can read God’s mind. Here’s my post on the subject from last Thursday. Read it and see just how egregious the distortion here is.

What’s missing from the AP’s version? Right — the beginning of what she said, the part that makes clear she’s not asserting that we’re doing God’s will but simply praying that we are. It’s the difference between me saying “McCain will win” and “I pray McCain will win.” The first is an assertion of fact/secret knowledge, the second is an expression of desire/hope. The AP actually stoops to picking up the quote mid-sentence to make it better fit the stereotype of the holy-roller yokel claiming divine inspiration for Bush’s Crusade.

Will Gibson acknowledge this egregious distortion?

***
More reax…

Kathryn Lopez: “Or was Charlie Gibson just condescendingly explaining the world to Sarah Palin?”

Commenter MNgirl: “I just finished watching both ABC News and I was okay with it for the first 5 minutes but when Gibson looked down his little nose at her disapprovingly and said ‘Why don’t you tell me what you think the Bush doctrine is……’he lost me. This one is going to backfire on the media once again. He blew it, women hate being patronized and women watching that are only going to see him trying play “gotcha” with Palin and her fan club is going to grow. What a jerk. He gets a gift handed to him and the most he can do is patronize her and try to trick her. Idiot.”

Commenter jencab: “This is a lame interview. Charlie belittled her, chopped up her answers, seems repulsed, and sighed. What the hell is that? I never seen him like this with any other politician. Unbelievable.”

Patterico: “Holey Moley — L.A. Times Criticizes Gibson for Mischaracterizing Palin’s Prayer”

Posted in: Sarah Palin

Regular View

comments (364)

trackbacks (57)

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

Trackback URL

Comments

« Older Comments

#453626

On September 12th, 2008 at 7:52 pm, AlohaGuy said:

Palin obtained her first passport two years ago
Scary.

Not really – she went to see the Alaska National Guard in the Middle East, not the Ritz-Carlton Spa in Germany. You know, as Commander checking on her forces. It’s that Executive Experience thing.
#453676

On September 12th, 2008 at 8:51 pm, Dimsdale said:

On September 12th, 2008 at 12:20 pm, RetFireman said: (#349)

Isn’t it interesting that the more they complain about a conservative, the better they perform? I would add Reagan to your list. They constantly called him an “amiable dunce,” yet he is responsible for the very welcomed downfall of the Soviet Union. If the liberal Democrats (or since) had been in control at the time, we would still be staring them down across the Berlin wall, and all those nice countries would still be behind the Iron Curtain.

Same thing with Bush. AlQ would still be in a Taliban run Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein would still be threatening his neighbors and citizens.

Bottom line: this all speaks to Palin’s potential greatness. And the Democrats know it, but they just can’t help themselves.
#453681

On September 12th, 2008 at 8:54 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

bemused

Sorry to break it to you but, even though he’s balck, Juan is a stone conservative (note that he does tome on the Fox plantation) and — whatever his leanings — a lame-ass excuse for a journalist.

Racist comment from the left. Nice one, bemused.

Are you surprised that there are actually people out there who won’t fall for the democrat’s “vote for us and we’ll give you money and more AA” scheme?
#453688

On September 12th, 2008 at 9:04 pm, Dimsdale said:

On September 12th, 2008 at 1:13 pm, JT said:

I just finished watching it. Yes Gibson was a condescending ass, but Sarah did fine. It was edited to make her look bad. She stuck to her convictions, avoided clear traps, and spoke in clear concise sentences. Obama should try it. If he can.

Do you mean that his Kerryesque “nuance” isn’t working? LOL!

Obama is so busy making sure he doesn’t say what his anti American mentors have taught him, he ends up stuttering, and hemming and hawing.
#453802

On September 13th, 2008 at 12:25 am, miron said:

Will these MSM guys have the guts to do an interview of Biden with the same belligerent tone?
#454154

On September 13th, 2008 at 12:28 pm, Patronedheart said:

On September 12th, 2008 at 1:27 am, dominigan said:
It irritates me so much how the MSM keeps hammering at “foreign policy” as if Obama is soooo much better.

Maybe she should have asked Charlie to compare Obama’s foreign policy experience. Since Obama keeps claiming that running for office counts… maybe he’s trying to include his German rock concert. Of course then it would become apparent that Jon Bon Jovi has more foreign policy experience than Obama… maybe HE should have been at the top of their ticket… they do like their stars after all…

Excellent post!
#454212

On September 13th, 2008 at 1:38 pm, RogerCfromSD said:

Does her not having a passport prevent her from being able to get one now?

No.

So what exactly is the issue here?