About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Sunday open thread

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 14, 2008 11:32 AM

It’s family time for me. What are you doing and what’s on your minds?

Posted in: Uncategorized

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Webloggin » Atlantic Magazine Exposed: Lib Photographer Caught Taking Liberties With McCain Photo Shoot

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 2 3 [4]

  1. #301
    On September 14th, 2008 at 8:49 pm, Bill Mack said:

    The Buffalo Bills have now won their first two games. This has been against reasonably good teams. Now I need to spend some time doing the book keeping for the local volunteer fire department and volunteer ambulance service.

    America isn’t about what is happening inside the beltway. It is about what is happening out here in flyover land.

  2. #302
    On September 14th, 2008 at 8:50 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    The Dem “Dream ticket” would be “Lohan/Winehouse.”

    Their slogan could be something like “Incomparable Incoherence and Incontinence” or “Real Rehab for America.”

  3. #303
    On September 14th, 2008 at 8:53 pm, talkin_bout said:

    Bill Mack,

    I was at the Jags-Bills game. Even as a huge Jaguars fan, I have to admit Buffalo looked great.

  4. #304
    On September 14th, 2008 at 8:54 pm, purplepeep said:

    backwoods conservative said:
    Steven Hawking is too brilliant and has accomplished too much for me to dismiss any of his ideas out of hand, but on some of his ideas I wonder if he has gotten too abstract in his thinking to be on the right track.

    Well, all I know is that I could take him in arm wrestling. But I’d take a peek over his shoulder if we taking a math pop quiz.

  5. #305
    On September 14th, 2008 at 8:55 pm, Rob said:


    The Buffalo Bills have now won their first two games.

    Oh boy, the “Bills” have won some game.

    The Roman leaders used to keep the MOB busy with the foolishness of the sport.

    Things have not changed much.

  6. #306
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:04 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Creating massive amounts of antimatter would probably require too much energy to be worth the return, plus there would be huge technical difficulties in storing and transporting it.

    I thought that was the Democrats.

  7. #307
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:05 pm, tbear44 said:

    Settling in for the winter in Bristol Bay, AK. Thanks to Sarah Palin for the extra $1,200. Everyone screamed that it was a waste of money to give Alaskans a fuel subsidy, but she did it anyway. For those of us in the wilderness it sure comes in handy! Don’t you wish your state payed you to live there? And is a red state to boot!

  8. #308
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:10 pm, talkin_bout said:

    Hey there guys,

    I just wanted to take a minute to introduce myself. I’m new to the site, but I’m already a huge fan.

    I’m 14 years old, and I’m getting angry that far-left ideas are beginning to become mainstream.

    I look forward to joining discussions on here in the coming weeks and months.

  9. #309
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:11 pm, JohnnyD said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 8:22 pm, backwoods conservative said:
    On September 14th, 2008 at 8:17 pm,
    What are you talking about? Conservatives are a bunch of stupid, ignorant, superstitious savages. Just ask any far left liberal. They’ll tell you.

    I’ve already been told….by family!

    BTW, thanks for your discertation of quantum phyics and such. Now, if you’ll just point me in the direction of the outhouse, everything will be fine. :)

  10. #310
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:13 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    Now, if you’ll just point me in the direction of the outhouse, everything will be fine.

    Just follow your nose!

  11. #311
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:14 pm, Dimsdale said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 6:06 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    edelweiss trolled:
    BTW, NYT is considered the most prestigious and the best newspaper in America. It has so far won something like 90 Pulitzer Prizes. The International Herald Tribune (the best and the most popular American newspaper outside USA) is owned by NYT and Washington Post.

    NYT is about to junk bond status.

    Assuming there is any money left (i.e. Sulzberger didn’t run off with what is left after he destroyed the paper), they can pay edelweiss to write that as an epitaph for the NYTimes.

  12. #312
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:15 pm, NestingHawk said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 7:15 pm, purplepeep said:

    NestingHawk said:
    The responses I’ve seen from the CERN staff to the “fearmongering” just haven’t been very effective rebuttals to the majority of the population. It seems like mostly they respond with arrogance and papers that are both badly written and above most people’s heads. They dismiss it as fearmongering and such, but aren’t very effective in explaining why it’s only fearmongering, or at rebutting any rebuttals to points that have been made.

    It’s not something I lose any sleep over, NHawk. My thinking is that when it’s time for “the end of the world”, it’ll be God Who will be closing down the store. And I don’t expect CERN will find God in a Higgs boson particle, just more proof of a Design that they can’t quite figure out.

    Thanks, purplepeep! I, too, believe God is in charge. I figure that however much we find out about the universe and how it works, there will always be one more question. There will never be a final answer as to “Why does it work that way?” except “Because God wants it to.” I also believe, though, that if something seems dangerous, we should still look into it and do what we can, not out of lack of faith in God but because I believe God wants us to do what we can to take care of ourselves.

    On September 14th, 2008 at 7:15 pm, purplepeep said:
    By the way, you learned good and fast on the quote highlighting! If you’ve visited a few forums, comment sections, etc. you know how you have to adjust to each one’s diff posting mechanisms.

    Thank you! This isn’t my first forum, but I never have used markup extensively, and I’m flattered by the compliment.

  13. #313
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:15 pm, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:

    tbear44,

    Let me preface this by admiting that I am not fully aware of where the $,1200 came from so I am open to education on the issue.

    How does a government payment to it’s residents support a conservative agenda? If, as I believe, the money came from taxes on oil companies wouldn’t the better thing to do be to lower the taxes?

    I am glad that Gov. Palin did not spend the state’s windfall on some unnecessary projects but I am trobled by the apparent wealth redistribution flavor of this.

    Anyone care to enlighten me?

  14. #314
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:16 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:10 pm, talkin_bout said:

    Hey there guys,

    I just wanted to take a minute to introduce myself. I’m new to the site, but I’m already a huge fan.

    Welcome aboard! As I’m sure you’ve already noticed, the discussions here are pretty lively. Chime in anytime. We’ll be glad to hear from you.

  15. #315
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:17 pm, sonofdy said:
  16. #316
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:18 pm, sonofdy said:

    not = now.

  17. #317
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:19 pm, beenthere said:

    Creating massive amounts of antimatter would probably require too much energy to be worth the return, plus there would be huge technical difficulties in storing and transporting it.

    As a form of highly concentrated energy, “Anti-M” — as the late, great physicist Robert Forward liked to refer to it — is impossible to beat. It would likely find its greatest value as the propulsion mechanism for interstellar flight (yeah, I know, Star Trek, but there is real science here) at slower-than-light speeds, however. Forward thought that the cost of producing Anti-M could be brought way down and that the storage problem could be solved. Of course, Anti-M interstellar flight starting with robot probes is something for the future (maybe in the second half of this century) if freedom, capitalism, and America should prevail. That’s a really big “if” obviously.

  18. #318
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:19 pm, JohnnyD said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:13 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    Just follow your nose!

    Somehow, I knew that was coming. Can you spare a copy of the NYT, just in case?

  19. #319
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:22 pm, brooklyn red said:

    Welcome talkin_bout

    Have a good time, but don’t give out any personal information…

  20. #320
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:23 pm, Peddler said:

    Lindsey Lohan “lashes out at Sarah Palin”. Well, I guess it’s all over now. If you tie Lindsey’s political acumen and ability to conduct an in-depth analysis in with all of the comments by Pamela Anderson, Whoppi Goldberg, Matt Damon, Barbara Streisand, and other celebrity types who express themselves so elequently and in such civil tones, McCain and Palin may as well stay home.

    I know I’m so disheartened by their insightful opinions and offerings I feel ashamed to ever have thought of supporting the ticket, much less sending them all the money we have to date. I know what, since they will need rehab after all of this, I will send even more money to the RNC just for that purpose alone.

    I am sure Lindsey and her friends can offer first person recommendations for good institutions offering psychological, emotional, and substance abuse help. And they say conservatives have no heart.

  21. #321
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:23 pm, JohnnyD said:

    I’m dropping off folks. It’s been a real hoot reading tonight.

    Maybe I won’t want the cable fixed after all. I always seem to learn a few things.

  22. #322
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:28 pm, Peddler said:

    By the way, this is my first post too. Some good thoughts on this blog, but some rather disturbing comments as well. It seems to me that Michelle puts the “Fairness Doctrine” in play in a practical manner so I imagine that is why she allows liberals to post here as well.

  23. #323
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:31 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:
  24. #324
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:33 pm, Marshall Russ said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:10 pm, talkin_bout said:

    Hey there guys,
    I just wanted to take a minute to introduce myself. I’m new to the site, but I’m already a huge fan.

    I’m 14 years old, and I’m getting angry that far-left ideas are beginning to become mainstream.

    I look forward to joining discussions on here in the coming weeks and months.

    Welcome. Maybe someone your age can interpret what some liberals on this sight are saying. Should be enlightning.

  25. #325
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:34 pm, pclevenger said:

    As far as CERN is concerned, if the doom sayers are right we have 4 years. Coincidentally this is when the Aztec (or is it Inca) calendar runs out of days. Good time to make long term investments.

  26. #326
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:35 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:10 pm, talkin_bout said:
    Hey there guys,

    I just wanted to take a minute to introduce myself. I’m new to the site, but I’m already a huge fan.

    I’m 14 years old, and I’m getting angry that far-left ideas are beginning to become mainstream.

    I look forward to joining discussions on here in the coming weeks and months.

    Welcome. I must say that I am intrigued as well as impressed that a fourteen year old would be interested in this forum. Hats off to you. Please don’t hesitate to just jump right in.

  27. #327
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:35 pm, shooter said:

    BRONCOS 2-0
    WOW, one of the craziest most exiting games I’ve ever been to.
    See ya tomorrow.

  28. #328
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:39 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:28 pm, Peddler said:
    By the way, this is my first post too. Some good thoughts on this blog, but some rather disturbing comments as well. It seems to me that Michelle puts the “Fairness Doctrine” in play in a practical manner so I imagine that is why she allows liberals to post here as well.

    Welcome. Oh you mean our resident trolls. Yes, Michelle is nice enough to keep them around.

  29. #329
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:41 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:19 pm, beenthere said:

    As a form of highly concentrated energy, “Anti-M” — as the late, great physicist Robert Forward liked to refer to it — is impossible to beat. It would likely find its greatest value as the propulsion mechanism for interstellar flight (yeah, I know, Star Trek, but there is real science here) at slower-than-light speeds, however.

    Excellent point. Interstellar flight may be one of the few things that would make it worth the investment. And it may be the only way we’ll ever reach the stars. It wouldn’t have the overwhelming diminishing returns problem the chemical fuel for our current reaction propulsion drives would have.

    And I agree it would have to be at slower than light speeds. Much as I might wish otherwise, I don’t believe there’s any way around that 186,000 mile per second speed limit.

    That speed limit is why I don’t believe our planet has been visited by beings from outer space. Alien civilizations would have the same difficulty traversing the vastness of interstellar space that we do.

  30. #330
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:42 pm, pclevenger said:

    As for anti-matter — I make it two or three times a week. Actually, I make PET isotopes for cancer diagnosis. The Fluorine-18 emits a positron (anti-matter) which then annihilates an electron releasing equal and opposite (direction) gamma rays which are read by the PET machine. Cool, Huh! We make F-18 out of Oxygen-18 (a naturally occurring stable isotope of Oxygen) using a proton accelerator. I know, more than you wanted to know.

  31. #331
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:43 pm, bjc said:

    Karl Rove(Bush’s Brain, Obama’s Hemorrhoid)has complained about the spate of bad ads recently; A great one for McCain/Palin or the RNC would be the extensive background checks required to be in the employ of the F.B.I., Secret Service, and yes, even the USDA; Among the required criteria is no past associations with known terrorists, whether foreign or domestic; Does William Ayres ring a bell; Failed background check; No POTUS for you Obama.

  32. #332
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:44 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    talkin_about

    Welcome-
    B-Red is right-don’t give any personal info-

    CS and Homeschool MOM…..

  33. #333
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:47 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    I know, more than you wanted to know.

    As a certain well known Vulcan would say, “Fascinating.”

  34. #334
    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:52 pm, NestingHawk said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 7:27 pm, backwoods conservative said:
    NestingHawk, the biggest reason I don’t worry about the alleged danger is that it has been pointed out that collisions of the same energy have already been occurring in the upper atmosphere by highly energetic cosmic rays. If the Earth were going to be destroyed by collisions of that high of an energy level, it would have already happened. The problem with those collisions is they don’t happen in a place where we can thoroughly study them, hence the need for the LHC.

    My only concern is about that is that Dr. Rossler has stated that the LHC experiment is different because they are using bigger particles, and I haven’t seen CERN address this assertion specifically. Otherwise, that is my favorite argument in the LHC’s favor.

    Understanding Hawking radiation requires a bit of background in quantum physics. It’s one of those things that’s hard to give a short answer to. It involves such quantum principles as the uncertainty principle and the formation of virtual particles.

    I am fascinated by the quantum physics involved, but will try to save tackling that aspect until I find a good science-based forum. (Only in the interests of being appropriate to the specific forum I’m typing in.) I understand that Stephen Hawking has said it doesn’t exist and that either way it’s all theory with no observational evidence. On the other hand, Stephen Hawking has been quoted as saying the experiment is a good thing, so maybe I haven’t checked into my sources enough.

    I thought the US was in possession of a much less powerful one that has been in use since 2000?

    Are you thinking of Fermilab?

    I think I melded two labs into one in my head, but I think that’s the one I OUGHT to have been referring to. I was, admittedly, mixing it up with Brookhaven on Long Island. Thanks for the cool link!

    The trend of particle accelerators is toward more powerful collisions. As the levels of energy we are able to explore increases, we are able to learn more about particle physics. The less powerful accelerators have taught us much. One of those things is that a predicted theoretical particle such as the Higgs boson is not to be found within that range.

    I think the LHC is more powerful than what we’ve tried before by a factor of about eight?

    I am by no means an expert on any of this. I’m just an amateur astronomer who has read extensively on the subjects of relativity and quantum physics. Knowledge of both is required for a deeper understanding of how the universe works. I might add that one of the best things that happened to astronomy was when astronomers and particle physicists began talking to each other.

    I have an interest in science, but no actual credentials. I do understand enough about astronomy to understand that it is heavily related to chemistry and physics.
    My understanding of relativity is pretty poor. The Gutenberg project is wonderful, but their version of the book doesn’t have graphics, and I can’t get it on loan from the library long enough to keep pausing and whining that Einstein is assuming humans perceive everything.

  35. #335
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:17 pm, NestingHawk said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 8:14 pm, Kevin K. said:
    NightHawk–I’m disappointed that the US didn’t build its alternative to CERN. Okay, maybe as a taxpayer I’m not, but since we contributed so much to Europe’s CERN, we might have gotten some domestic return. Am I worried about what CERN’s collider will find or the allegations of the end of the world, no.

    I’m a bit confused as to why so much US money is involved in this myself, even if the end-of-the-world concerns are overhyped. (As is obvious from my other posts, I’m very interested in understanding that argument better. And interested in general opinion, so thank you to all who said something!)
    It also seems like people feel the US government not giving money to something is tantamount to the US government banning it. I wish more people would be a bit more careful about the distinction.

  36. #336
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:17 pm, pianotchr said:

    Hey, CS - homeschool mom… me too!

  37. #337
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:18 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    NestingHawk, my understanding of relativity and quantum physics began when read Brian Greene’s The Elegant Universe. An excellent book to further your unerstanding of quantum physics is The New Quantum Universe by Tony Hey and Patrick Walters.

    You may be able to find these in a library, but I prefer to purchase books, if possible. That way I can take all the time I need to figure out what they’re talking about. I love reading books like that, but I can’t go through one of those as fast as I can a good novel.

  38. #338
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:19 pm, almeehan said:

    CNN is doing a feature on Palin. Some good, some obviously biased against her, especially about troopergate.

  39. #339
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:21 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    pianotchr :-) best choice - don’t you think?!!!!!

    What do you want to bet that talkin_about is homeschooled…

  40. #340
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:22 pm, T-Bone said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:41 pm, backwoods conservative said:
    Much as I might wish otherwise, I don’t believe there’s any way around that 186,000 mile per second speed limit.

    They once said the world was flat.

    If you travel faster than that, would you be traveling in time?

  41. #341
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:28 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    If you travel faster than that, would you be traveling in time?

    Theoretically. The big problem with it is that the closer you get to the speed of light, the more energy it takes to accelerate any further. According to Einstein’s equations, accelerating to the speed of light would require an infinite amount of energy. That is what makes going beyond that an impossibility. I might add that the increasing energy requirements of approaching the speed of light have already been verified in particle accelerator experiments.

  42. #342
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:30 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    I found this article interesting. Obamanomics.
    Here’s an excerpt:

    That’s class warfare,” O’Reilly objected. “You’re taking the wealthy in America, the big earners . . . you’re taking money away from them and you’re giving it to people who don’t. That’s called income redistribution. It’s a socialist tenet. Come on, you know that.”

    “Bill, Bill, Bill, Bill,” Obama replied. “Teddy Roosevelt supported a progressive income tax.” He acknowledged that he doesn’t enjoy paying taxes either - “you think I like writing the check?” - but that “there are certain things we’ve got to do.” His tax proposal, he explained, was a matter of civility:

    “If I am sitting pretty and you’ve got a waitress who is making minimum wage plus tips, and I can afford it and she can’t, what’s the big deal for me to say, I’m going to pay a little bit more? That’s neighborliness.” If that is Obama’s rationale for making the tax code even more steeply progressive than it already is, it’s no wonder voters are having second thoughts about his economic aptitude.

  43. #343
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:31 pm, CantCureStupid said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:17 pm, sonofdy said:
    Sharia Law is now legaly binding in England. Link here. Welcome to the Islamic Republic of England.

    When I make remarks about the U.K. circling the bowl, this is what I mean. This is what happens when a government gets so caught up in seeming tollerant that it abdicates its good sense. Good luck closing that dopey loophole now.

    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:10 pm, talkin_bout said:

    Hey there guys,

    I just wanted to take a minute to introduce myself. I’m new to the site, but I’m already a huge fan.

    Welcome, from one newbie to another. I can tell you that this is one of the best, most welcoming and friendly forums on the net, and I’m glad to know you. :)

    Lindsey Lohan “lashes out at Sarah Palin”.

    Bummer.

    I used to want to act (when I was a teenager), and I didn’t suck at it, but I was fairly discouraged once I realized that dogs and monkeys-in-diapers could be taught the trade as well. Also, I’m pretty sure the required lobotomy would have upset me. ;)

  44. #344
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:31 pm, Jim M. said:

    Interesting.

    Youtube clip including some old footage of Obama using his Ayer’s provided job with Annenberg to launch his political career:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-45A6I-N5I

  45. #345
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:33 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    30, one of the things I loved the most about Bill’s interview with him is he got all over him about his socialist ideas.

  46. #346
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:34 pm, T-Bone said:

    And perhaps thats where you “Break on through to the other side”, as Jim Morrison said.

    To get to the breaking point requires more than we know, and more than we can imagine, but past there may require no energy.

    Like getting a second wind.

  47. #347
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:34 pm, tbear44 said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:15 pm, Last Massachusetts Conservative said:
    tbear44,

    Let me preface this by admiting that I am not fully aware of where the $,1200 came from so I am open to education on the issue.

    How does a government payment to it’s residents support a conservative agenda? If, as I believe, the money came from taxes on oil companies wouldn’t the better thing to do be to lower the taxes?

    I am glad that Gov. Palin did not spend the state’s windfall on some unnecessary projects but I am trobled by the apparent wealth redistribution flavor of this.

    Anyone care to enlighten me?

    I was not a big fan of Palin when she became the governor of our great state, but anything that keeps BHO out of office works for me! Not to mention the fact that the State of Alaska has paid me over $30,000 over the years via PFD’s to live in God’s country. You should move here it’s a great place to live! As it is gasoline taxes have been suspended, no sales tax in most of the state except for a few communities, and no state income tax. It’s a win-win and anyone who thinks differently obviously doesn’t live here.

  48. #348
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:37 pm, zorro said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 8:33 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:
    My Steelers are up tonight. Go Steelers!

    …and the Super Steelers are looking good against Cleveland in the wind and rain. 10 to 3 at the start of the 4th quarter.

  49. #349
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:42 pm, NestingHawk said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 8:28 pm, purplepeep said:
    I’d say that’s a purty good translation, NHawk. The particular big prize CERN is eyeing with this is finding what’s commonly called the “God Particle” (Higgs boson particle).

    Here’s a news story that’s not too over-run with heavy scientific/particle physics jargon that may be of interest to some:

    Dr Peter Higgs: God’s particle

    A snippet:

    “Officially it is known as the Higgs Boson though Higgs admits that Brout and Englert both deserve to be included in the nomenclature. In physics jargon, it is usually referred to as the “God particle”, much to the dismay of Higgs, who is a staunch atheist.

    Ironically, given that CERN rejected the original paper, the Large Hadron Collider project may succeed in finally nailing it down. If so, Higgs, Brout and Englert are all more or less guaranteed the Nobel Prize. Higgs says he’s keeping a bottle of champagne handy, though it would take at least three years for the LHC data to offer proof, one way or another.

    Although Higgs is highly respected in his field, not everyone believes the Higgs Boson exists. Superstar physicist Steven Hawking has reiterated several times that he doesn’t think the Higgs Boson exists and has taken a $100 bet to that effect. Higgs and Hawking had a recent public spat with Higgs saying, “I am very doubtful about Steven’s calculations. Frankly I don’t think they are good enough”.
    -end of snippet-

    He could be wrong, but I’d give Steve the benefit of the doubt on this one. It’s not for nothing they refered to him as a “superstar” in the article.

    Thank you!
    I bookmarked the link for later perusal.
    I remember thinking something was off about A Brief History of Time-maybe just felt he was too sure of himself or something-but I would never argue that Stephen Hawking isn’t brilliant. And I think that book did help me visualize theories regarding gravity.

  50. #350
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:44 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:33 pm, backwoods conservative said:
    30, one of the things I loved the most about Bill’s interview with him is he got all over him about his socialist ideas.

    I didn’t catch the interview. But I am glad to hear that he held his feet to the fire about it… nobody else will.

  51. #351
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:51 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:37 pm,

    zorro said:
    On September 14th, 2008 at 8:33 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:
    My Steelers are up tonight. Go Steelers!
    …and the Super Steelers are looking good against Cleveland in the wind and rain. 10 to 3 at the start of the 4th quarter.

    But they are starting to make my blood boil. They have to play better defense.

    Nice sack.

  52. #352
    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:53 pm, T-Bone said:

    3rd and 7. need a stop

  53. #353
    On September 14th, 2008 at 11:00 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    10-6.

    We need to score again and sew this thing up… stating the obvious, I know.

  54. #354
    On September 14th, 2008 at 11:00 pm, NestingHawk said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 9:34 pm, pclevenger said:
    As far as CERN is concerned, if the doom sayers are right we have 4 years. Coincidentally this is when the Aztec (or is it Inca) calendar runs out of days. Good time to make long term investments.

    I thought it was the Mayan calendar. I’ve seen other people pointing that out, but I think it ends there because that’s when the solar system has completed one galactic orbit from when they started the calendar.

    From Wikipedia:
    “The Mesoamerican Long Count calendar forms the basis for a New Age belief, first forecast by José Argüelles, that a cataclysm will take place on or about 21 December 2012, a forecast that mainstream Mayanist scholars consider a misinterpretation.[12]”
    “^ Susan Milbrath, Curator of Latin American Art and Archaeology , Florida Museum of Natural History, quoted in USA Today, Wednesday, March 28, 2007, p. 11D.
    “For the ancient Maya, it was a huge celebration to make it to the end of a whole cycle,” says Sandra Noble, executive director of the Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies, Inc. in Crystal River, Florida. To render December 21, 2012, as a doomsday or moment of cosmic shifting, she says, is “a complete fabrication and a chance for a lot of people to cash in.” (Quoted in USA Today, Wednesday, March 28, 2007, p. 11D.)”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayan_calendar

    And I found the medical stuff interesting.

  55. #355
    On September 14th, 2008 at 11:10 pm, NestingHawk said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 10:18 pm, backwoods conservative said:
    NestingHawk, my understanding of relativity and quantum physics began when read Brian Greene’s The Elegant Universe. An excellent book to further your unerstanding of quantum physics is The New Quantum Universe by Tony Hey and Patrick Walters.

    You may be able to find these in a library, but I prefer to purchase books, if possible. That way I can take all the time I need to figure out what they’re talking about. I love reading books like that, but I can’t go through one of those as fast as I can a good novel.

    Thank you! I’ll definitely consider reading those. It’s hard to get a good recommendation. I’ve gotten through much of Taking the Quantum Leap and liked the first part, but I drifted after I felt it was getting more into personal opinion on what everything meant than established concepts.
    You have a point about purchasing instead of borrowing, too.And I would be impressed to the point of nervous if I ever ran into anyone who could genuinely go through one of those as fast as a good novel.

  56. #356
    On September 14th, 2008 at 11:10 pm, tamarah180 said:

    It was a great Sunday:
    Mossied around the house until 11
    Spent 3 hours at McCain headquarters making calls
    Went to my sisters and made baked chicken for dinner for us (also watched “Legally Blond2″)
    Got a couple hours in to read this blog.

  57. #357
    On September 14th, 2008 at 11:11 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    I thought it was the Mayan calendar. I’ve seen other people pointing that out, but I think it ends there because that’s when the solar system has completed one galactic orbit from when they started the calendar.

    Not likely. It takes the sun 225-250 million years to complete one orbit around the galaxy. I’m pretty sure the Mayan calendar hasn’t been around that long.

    None of the other doomsday prophecies have ever come true, why should this one be any different?

  58. #358
    On September 14th, 2008 at 11:14 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    And I would be impressed to the point of nervous if I ever ran into anyone who could genuinely go through one of those as fast as a good novel.

    The only person I could think of who could do that would be the fictional Mr. Scott.

  59. #359
    On September 14th, 2008 at 11:27 pm, popcornguy said:

    I finally watched an entire Obama ad and was thrilled with the content. The ad showed some of Sen. McCain’s campaign advisors and stated how they worked as lobbyists prior to the campaign. The hook was that if the McCain campaign staff was filled with lobbyists, who would run the White House?

    Would anyone believe — John McCain?

    As I read between the lines of how that ad was put together, it became obvious the puppet masters managing Sen. Obama’s campaign fully expect to be running the White House should their man end up with more votes. Apparently, ‘they’ don’t believe a President runs the country, his staff does.

    Thank you once again to the Obama campaign for providing the entertainment I so enjoy during election season.

  60. #360
    On September 14th, 2008 at 11:45 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    I’ll wrap up tonight’s discussion of theoretical physics by pointing out that scientists are trying very hard to find a way to unite relativity and quantum physics into one big unified theory. Nobody knows how to do that yet, but Tim Joseph wrote a very memorable poem about it called Unified Field Theory. Check it out.

  61. #361
    On September 14th, 2008 at 11:59 pm, NestingHawk said:

    On September 14th, 2008 at 11:11 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    I thought it was the Mayan calendar. I’ve seen other people pointing that out, but I think it ends there because that’s when the solar system has completed one galactic orbit from when they started the calendar.

    Not likely. It takes the sun 225-250 million years to complete one orbit around the galaxy. I’m pretty sure the Mayan calendar hasn’t been around that long.

    None of the other doomsday prophecies have ever come true, why should this one be any different?

    Whoops! Thanks for the correction. I’ll have to try to figure out why I thought that later.

    On September 14th, 2008 at 11:14 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    And I would be impressed to the point of nervous if I ever ran into anyone who could genuinely go through one of those as fast as a good novel.

    The only person I could think of who could do that would be the fictional Mr. Scott.

    That made me laugh.

    I know I’ll be bookmarking the last link you provided.

  62. #362
    On September 15th, 2008 at 12:37 am, Papa Louie said:

    Am I a “backwoods conservative” if I get a chuckle out of
    Red State Update?
    (language caution, but nothing worse than what you might hear at Obama’s church.)

  63. #363
    On September 15th, 2008 at 12:46 am, Papa Louie said:

    Here’s another Red State Update about Sarah Palin. It starts out a little slow but has some hilarous moments.

  64. #364
    On September 15th, 2008 at 8:40 am, purplepeep said:

    Peddler said:
    It seems to me that Michelle puts the “Fairness Doctrine” in play in a practical manner so I imagine that is why she allows liberals to post here as well.

    Nah, Peddler. We are hoping against hope to be the first to see a liberal actually express an intelligent, raional or unemotional thought. It would be something like being present when Morse sent his first telegraph message. “What hath God wrought?”

    We’re still waiting and “hoping” :)

  65. #365
    On September 15th, 2008 at 8:52 am, backwoods conservative said:

    We are hoping against hope to be the first to see a liberal actually express an intelligent, raional or unemotional thought.

    That would be a change I would have a hard time believing.

  66. #366
    On September 15th, 2008 at 9:21 am, Laree said:

    It would be better to see the back of this guys head.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080915/ap_on_re_af/zimbabwe_10

Comment pages: « 1 2 3 [4]

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Why GM is doomed

December 3, 2008 09:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

55 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Reading the fine print.

Where in the world

November 28, 2008 04:00 PM by Michelle Malkin

23 Comments | 1 Trackback

Black Friday kills

November 28, 2008 10:11 AM by Michelle Malkin

170 Comments | 20 Trackbacks

“They took the doors off the hinges. He was trampled and killed in front of me.”

T’day open thread

November 27, 2008 12:28 PM by Michelle Malkin

86 Comments | 1 Trackback

Woo-hoo: We’re Number Three!

November 24, 2008 12:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

140 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Where in the world

November 20, 2008 05:49 AM by Michelle Malkin

14 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Where in the world

November 19, 2008 02:03 PM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Remembering Jonestown

November 18, 2008 11:25 PM by Michelle Malkin

72 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Cult awareness.

Sunday open thread

November 16, 2008 10:05 AM by Michelle Malkin

383 Comments | 1 Trackback


Categories: Uncategorized


Patterico

» Alito Whacks Biden

Weekly Standard

» Why Not Baghdad?