<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday open thread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/14/sunday-open-thread-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/14/sunday-open-thread-3/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:50:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laree</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/14/sunday-open-thread-3/comment-page-4/#comment-455345</link>
		<dc:creator>Laree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14467#comment-455345</guid>
		<description>It would be better to see the back of this guys head.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080915/ap_on_re_af/zimbabwe_10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be better to see the back of this guys head.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080915/ap_on_re_af/zimbabwe_10" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080915/ap_on_re_af/zimbabwe_10</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: backwoods conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/14/sunday-open-thread-3/comment-page-4/#comment-455312</link>
		<dc:creator>backwoods conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14467#comment-455312</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We are hoping against hope to be the first to see a liberal actually express an intelligent, raional or unemotional thought.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That would be a change I would have a hard time believing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We are hoping against hope to be the first to see a liberal actually express an intelligent, raional or unemotional thought.</p></blockquote>
<p>That would be a change I would have a hard time believing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purplepeep</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/14/sunday-open-thread-3/comment-page-4/#comment-455297</link>
		<dc:creator>purplepeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14467#comment-455297</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Peddler said: 
It seems to me that Michelle puts the “Fairness Doctrine” in play in a practical manner so I imagine that is why she allows liberals to post here as well.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nah, Peddler. We are hoping against hope to be the first to see a liberal actually express an intelligent, raional or unemotional thought. It would be something like being present when Morse sent his first telegraph message. &quot;What hath God wrought?&quot; 

We&#039;re still waiting and &quot;hoping&quot; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Peddler said:<br />
It seems to me that Michelle puts the “Fairness Doctrine” in play in a practical manner so I imagine that is why she allows liberals to post here as well.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nah, Peddler. We are hoping against hope to be the first to see a liberal actually express an intelligent, raional or unemotional thought. It would be something like being present when Morse sent his first telegraph message. &#8220;What hath God wrought?&#8221; </p>
<p>We&#8217;re still waiting and &#8220;hoping&#8221; <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Papa Louie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/14/sunday-open-thread-3/comment-page-4/#comment-455154</link>
		<dc:creator>Papa Louie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 04:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14467#comment-455154</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-W5IAPK0hbU&amp;NR=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Red State Update &lt;/a&gt;about Sarah Palin.  It starts out a little slow but has some hilarous moments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-W5IAPK0hbU&amp;NR=1" rel="nofollow">Red State Update </a>about Sarah Palin.  It starts out a little slow but has some hilarous moments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Papa Louie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/14/sunday-open-thread-3/comment-page-4/#comment-455151</link>
		<dc:creator>Papa Louie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 04:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14467#comment-455151</guid>
		<description>Am I a &quot;backwoods conservative&quot; if I get a chuckle out of 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpUrnZHc0I4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Red State Update&lt;/a&gt;?
(language caution, but nothing worse than what you might hear at Obama&#039;s church.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I a &#8220;backwoods conservative&#8221; if I get a chuckle out of<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpUrnZHc0I4" rel="nofollow">Red State Update</a>?<br />
(language caution, but nothing worse than what you might hear at Obama&#8217;s church.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NestingHawk</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/14/sunday-open-thread-3/comment-page-4/#comment-455126</link>
		<dc:creator>NestingHawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14467#comment-455126</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On September 14th, 2008 at 11:11 pm, backwoods conservative said: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;I thought it was the Mayan calendar. I’ve seen other people pointing that out, but I think it ends there because that’s when the solar system has completed one galactic orbit from when they started the calendar.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Not likely. It takes the sun 225-250 million years to complete one orbit around the galaxy. I’m pretty sure the Mayan calendar hasn’t been around that long.

None of the other doomsday prophecies have ever come true, why should this one be any different?

&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Whoops! Thanks for the correction. I&#039;ll have to try to figure out why I thought that later. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;On September 14th, 2008 at 11:14 pm, backwoods conservative said: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;
And I would be impressed to the point of nervous if I ever ran into anyone who could genuinely go through one of those as fast as a good novel. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
The only person I could think of who could do that would be the fictional Mr. Scott.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That made me laugh. 

I know I&#039;ll be bookmarking the last link you provided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On September 14th, 2008 at 11:11 pm, backwoods conservative said: </p>
<blockquote><p>I thought it was the Mayan calendar. I’ve seen other people pointing that out, but I think it ends there because that’s when the solar system has completed one galactic orbit from when they started the calendar.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not likely. It takes the sun 225-250 million years to complete one orbit around the galaxy. I’m pretty sure the Mayan calendar hasn’t been around that long.</p>
<p>None of the other doomsday prophecies have ever come true, why should this one be any different?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Whoops! Thanks for the correction. I&#8217;ll have to try to figure out why I thought that later. </p>
<blockquote><p>On September 14th, 2008 at 11:14 pm, backwoods conservative said: </p>
<blockquote><p>
And I would be impressed to the point of nervous if I ever ran into anyone who could genuinely go through one of those as fast as a good novel. </p></blockquote>
<p>The only person I could think of who could do that would be the fictional Mr. Scott.</p></blockquote>
<p>That made me laugh. </p>
<p>I know I&#8217;ll be bookmarking the last link you provided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: backwoods conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/14/sunday-open-thread-3/comment-page-4/#comment-455106</link>
		<dc:creator>backwoods conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14467#comment-455106</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll wrap up tonight&#039;s discussion of theoretical physics by pointing out that scientists are trying very hard to find a way to unite relativity and quantum physics into one big unified theory. Nobody knows how to do that yet, but Tim Joseph wrote a very memorable poem about it called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chem.purdue.edu/chemsafety/UnifiedFieldTheory.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Unified Field Theory&lt;/a&gt;. Check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll wrap up tonight&#8217;s discussion of theoretical physics by pointing out that scientists are trying very hard to find a way to unite relativity and quantum physics into one big unified theory. Nobody knows how to do that yet, but Tim Joseph wrote a very memorable poem about it called <a href="http://www.chem.purdue.edu/chemsafety/UnifiedFieldTheory.htm" rel="nofollow">Unified Field Theory</a>. Check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: popcornguy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/14/sunday-open-thread-3/comment-page-4/#comment-455087</link>
		<dc:creator>popcornguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14467#comment-455087</guid>
		<description>I finally watched an entire Obama ad and was thrilled with the content.  The ad showed some of Sen. McCain&#039;s campaign advisors and stated how they worked as lobbyists prior to the campaign.  The hook was that if the McCain campaign staff was filled with lobbyists, who would run the White House?  

Would anyone believe -- John McCain?

As I read between the lines of how that ad was put together, it became obvious the puppet masters managing Sen. Obama&#039;s campaign fully expect to be running the White House should their man end up with more votes. Apparently, &#039;they&#039; don&#039;t believe a President runs the country, his staff does.  

Thank you once again to the Obama campaign for providing the entertainment I so enjoy during election season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally watched an entire Obama ad and was thrilled with the content.  The ad showed some of Sen. McCain&#8217;s campaign advisors and stated how they worked as lobbyists prior to the campaign.  The hook was that if the McCain campaign staff was filled with lobbyists, who would run the White House?  </p>
<p>Would anyone believe &#8212; John McCain?</p>
<p>As I read between the lines of how that ad was put together, it became obvious the puppet masters managing Sen. Obama&#8217;s campaign fully expect to be running the White House should their man end up with more votes. Apparently, &#8216;they&#8217; don&#8217;t believe a President runs the country, his staff does.  </p>
<p>Thank you once again to the Obama campaign for providing the entertainment I so enjoy during election season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: backwoods conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/14/sunday-open-thread-3/comment-page-4/#comment-455074</link>
		<dc:creator>backwoods conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14467#comment-455074</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And I would be impressed to the point of nervous if I ever ran into anyone who could genuinely go through one of those as fast as a good novel.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The only person I could think of who could do that would be the fictional Mr. Scott.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And I would be impressed to the point of nervous if I ever ran into anyone who could genuinely go through one of those as fast as a good novel.</p></blockquote>
<p>The only person I could think of who could do that would be the fictional Mr. Scott.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: backwoods conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/14/sunday-open-thread-3/comment-page-4/#comment-455072</link>
		<dc:creator>backwoods conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14467#comment-455072</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I thought it was the Mayan calendar. I’ve seen other people pointing that out, but I think it ends there because that’s when the solar system has completed one galactic orbit from when they started the calendar.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not likely. It takes the sun 225-250 million years to complete one orbit around the galaxy. I&#039;m pretty sure the Mayan calendar hasn&#039;t been around that long.

None of the other doomsday prophecies have ever come true, why should this one be any different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I thought it was the Mayan calendar. I’ve seen other people pointing that out, but I think it ends there because that’s when the solar system has completed one galactic orbit from when they started the calendar.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not likely. It takes the sun 225-250 million years to complete one orbit around the galaxy. I&#8217;m pretty sure the Mayan calendar hasn&#8217;t been around that long.</p>
<p>None of the other doomsday prophecies have ever come true, why should this one be any different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tamarah180</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/14/sunday-open-thread-3/comment-page-4/#comment-455071</link>
		<dc:creator>tamarah180</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14467#comment-455071</guid>
		<description>It was a great Sunday:
Mossied around the house until 11
Spent 3 hours at McCain headquarters making calls
Went to my sisters and made baked chicken for dinner for us (also watched &quot;Legally Blond2&quot;)
Got a couple hours in to read this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a great Sunday:<br />
Mossied around the house until 11<br />
Spent 3 hours at McCain headquarters making calls<br />
Went to my sisters and made baked chicken for dinner for us (also watched &#8220;Legally Blond2&#8243;)<br />
Got a couple hours in to read this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NestingHawk</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/14/sunday-open-thread-3/comment-page-4/#comment-455070</link>
		<dc:creator>NestingHawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14467#comment-455070</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On September 14th, 2008 at 10:18 pm, backwoods conservative said: 
NestingHawk, my understanding of relativity and quantum physics began when read Brian Greene’s The Elegant Universe. An excellent book to further your unerstanding of quantum physics is The New Quantum Universe by Tony Hey and Patrick Walters.

You may be able to find these in a library, but I prefer to purchase books, if possible. That way I can take all the time I need to figure out what they’re talking about. I love reading books like that, but I can’t go through one of those as fast as I can a good novel.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thank you! I&#039;ll definitely consider reading those. It&#039;s hard to get a good recommendation. I&#039;ve gotten through much of &lt;i&gt;Taking the Quantum Leap&lt;/i&gt; and liked the first part, but I drifted after I felt it was getting more into personal opinion on what everything meant than established concepts. 
You have a point about purchasing instead of borrowing, too.And I would be impressed to the point of nervous if I ever ran into anyone who could genuinely go through one of those as fast as a good novel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On September 14th, 2008 at 10:18 pm, backwoods conservative said:<br />
NestingHawk, my understanding of relativity and quantum physics began when read Brian Greene’s The Elegant Universe. An excellent book to further your unerstanding of quantum physics is The New Quantum Universe by Tony Hey and Patrick Walters.</p>
<p>You may be able to find these in a library, but I prefer to purchase books, if possible. That way I can take all the time I need to figure out what they’re talking about. I love reading books like that, but I can’t go through one of those as fast as I can a good novel.</p></blockquote>
<p>Thank you! I&#8217;ll definitely consider reading those. It&#8217;s hard to get a good recommendation. I&#8217;ve gotten through much of <i>Taking the Quantum Leap</i> and liked the first part, but I drifted after I felt it was getting more into personal opinion on what everything meant than established concepts.<br />
You have a point about purchasing instead of borrowing, too.And I would be impressed to the point of nervous if I ever ran into anyone who could genuinely go through one of those as fast as a good novel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NestingHawk</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/14/sunday-open-thread-3/comment-page-4/#comment-455065</link>
		<dc:creator>NestingHawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14467#comment-455065</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On September 14th, 2008 at 9:34 pm, pclevenger said: 
As far as CERN is concerned, if the doom sayers are right we have 4 years. Coincidentally this is when the Aztec (or is it Inca) calendar runs out of days. Good time to make long term investments.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I thought it was the Mayan calendar. I&#039;ve seen other people pointing that out, but I think it ends there because that&#039;s when the solar system has completed one galactic orbit from when they started the calendar.

From Wikipedia:
&quot;The Mesoamerican Long Count calendar forms the basis for a New Age belief, first forecast by José Argüelles, that a cataclysm will take place on or about 21 December 2012, a forecast that mainstream Mayanist scholars consider a misinterpretation.[12]&quot;
&quot;^ Susan Milbrath, Curator of Latin American Art and Archaeology , Florida Museum of Natural History, quoted in USA Today, Wednesday, March 28, 2007, p. 11D.
&quot;For the ancient Maya, it was a huge celebration to make it to the end of a whole cycle,&quot; says Sandra Noble, executive director of the Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies, Inc. in Crystal River, Florida. To render December 21, 2012, as a doomsday or moment of cosmic shifting, she says, is &quot;a complete fabrication and a chance for a lot of people to cash in.&quot; (Quoted in USA Today, Wednesday, March 28, 2007, p. 11D.)&quot; 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayan_calendar


And I found the medical stuff interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On September 14th, 2008 at 9:34 pm, pclevenger said:<br />
As far as CERN is concerned, if the doom sayers are right we have 4 years. Coincidentally this is when the Aztec (or is it Inca) calendar runs out of days. Good time to make long term investments.</p></blockquote>
<p>I thought it was the Mayan calendar. I&#8217;ve seen other people pointing that out, but I think it ends there because that&#8217;s when the solar system has completed one galactic orbit from when they started the calendar.</p>
<p>From Wikipedia:<br />
&#8220;The Mesoamerican Long Count calendar forms the basis for a New Age belief, first forecast by José Argüelles, that a cataclysm will take place on or about 21 December 2012, a forecast that mainstream Mayanist scholars consider a misinterpretation.[12]&#8221;<br />
&#8220;^ Susan Milbrath, Curator of Latin American Art and Archaeology , Florida Museum of Natural History, quoted in USA Today, Wednesday, March 28, 2007, p. 11D.<br />
&#8220;For the ancient Maya, it was a huge celebration to make it to the end of a whole cycle,&#8221; says Sandra Noble, executive director of the Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies, Inc. in Crystal River, Florida. To render December 21, 2012, as a doomsday or moment of cosmic shifting, she says, is &#8220;a complete fabrication and a chance for a lot of people to cash in.&#8221; (Quoted in USA Today, Wednesday, March 28, 2007, p. 11D.)&#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayan_calendar" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayan_calendar</a></p>
<p>And I found the medical stuff interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 30 pcs of silver</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/14/sunday-open-thread-3/comment-page-4/#comment-455064</link>
		<dc:creator>30 pcs of silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14467#comment-455064</guid>
		<description>10-6. 

We need to score again and sew this thing up... stating the obvious, I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10-6. </p>
<p>We need to score again and sew this thing up&#8230; stating the obvious, I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T-Bone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/14/sunday-open-thread-3/comment-page-4/#comment-455063</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Bone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14467#comment-455063</guid>
		<description>3rd and 7. need a stop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3rd and 7. need a stop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

