Democrats pass hoax drilling bill

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 16, 2008 10:55 PM

Nancy Pelosi declared drilling a “hoax.”

Now, after getting hammered by the GOP and public opinion demanding that the Democrats in charge take steps toward energy independence, San Fran Nan and her do-nothing crew have passed a drilling bill that is, well, a hoax. The bill is HR 6899.

Text here. The roll call vote is here.

CQ reports tonight:

After months of debate about expanding offshore oil and gas drilling, the House passed legislation Tuesday that could open up large areas off U.S. coastlines to energy production.

The bill (HR 6899) passed 236-189 despite the objections of Republicans who said it would do little to boost offshore oil and gas production. President Bush threatened a veto.

A Republican attempt to stall the measure was defeated. The chamber voted 191-226 against a motion to recommit the bill to the Natural Resources Committee.

After watching Republicans gain political traction in recent weeks with calls for more offshore drilling, Democratic leaders hope the legislation will provide political cover for moderate members of their caucus who face tough re-election fights.

Democrats touted the bill as a compromise that would expand domestic production and invest in alternative energy sources. It would allow drilling beyond 100 miles off U.S. shores and give states the option of allowing production beyond 50 miles from the shores. It proposes major incentives for renewable energy, building efficiency and advanced technologies for coal-fired power plants.

The American Conservative Union called out the Dem bluff earlier today:

When we were kids, we all played a variation of the game “Let’s Pretend” in which we pretended to do something or be somebody knowing it was make-believe. The authors of this bill are playing “Let’s Pretend” with the American people, pretending they are passing a bill to increase domestic energy production when they know it will do no such thing.

By eliminating revenue sharing for the states in royalties for offshore oil and gas drilling while requiring states to approve the drilling leases, the bill’s sponsors know it is unlikely the states will bother to give their approval. Even Democratic Senator Mary Landrieu of Louisiana has said this bill “will not see the light of day in the Senate” should it pass the House.

The bill prohibits drilling less than 50 miles offshore when the sponsors know that, to give an example, 95% of the known reserves off the coast of California are less than 50 miles out.

Once again, as in other energy legislation, the bill needlessly increases taxes that only serve to increase the cost of energy. The bill will also increase electricity bills for the average consumer by forcing utility companies to use alternative fuels regardless of the cost. This provision has already been rejected by the Senate in a previous energy bill.

The American people are demanding we change our bankrupt energy policy which has prevented the U.S. from utilizing our own resources and made us dangerously dependent on foreign oil supplies from unfriendly countries. They will not fall for a bill full of gimmicks which does not do the job.

Sham:

Democratic leaders called it a step toward energy independence, but Republicans labeled it a “sham” because most of the estimated 18 billion barrels of oil believed to lie below off-limits coastal waters are within 50 miles of land and will remain out of bounds.

The measure passed in a largely party-line vote of 236-189. It now goes to the Senate, where energy will be the topic later in the week. Thirteen Democrats bucked their leadership and voted against the measure.

***

Keep putting pressure on the Senate’s sellout Gang of [Fill-in-the-blank). It’s up to 20.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Ace of Spades HQ
  2. The College Politico » Blog Archive » House passes drilling bill!!! Oh, wait…
  3. Put The Pressure On The Sellouts: Democrats pass hoax drilling bill | Right Voices
  4. MishMashZone » Hoax Drilling Bill Passes House
  5. A Small Corner of Sanity - An Online Oasis for Conservative Thought
  6. David’s Blog of Common Sense » House OKs bill allowing more offshore oil drilling - CNN.com
  7. Little Miss Attila
  8. Drill we Will (Thank you Nancy P) - PennJersey.info Forums
  9. Drill Bill Sham | Think Forward
  10. Democrats Pass Hoax Drilling Bill « TruthReportNow
  11. Pelosi & Co. Try To Worm Their Way Out Of Offshore Drilling « Beltway Snark
  12. Bush Will Veto Dem Drilling Bill: Drill, Baby, Drill in Two Weeks | The Patriot Room
  13. The Patriot Room
  14. F***! - House passes crappy, stupid, fake “drilling” bill. « Assaulting the Spire
  15. The Dan Lee Report » Blog Archive » Pelosi Democrats sign “The Sugar Pill Drilling Bill”, & insult our intelligence.
  16. Dems Pass Poor Drilling Bill in House | Skeptics Global Warming
  17. Public Secrets
  18. silent E speaks - Conservatively Speaking from Western Waukesha County » House Backs Offshore Drilling……..NOT!!!!!!
  19. Hello from a republican blogger - PennJersey.info Forums
  20. Leaning Straight Up
  21. Obama Svengali, Reid and Pelosi Clueless: « Riggword Weblog

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:03 pm, regularguy said:

    It’s nothing but a sham. Pelosi and her verminous brethren have absolutely zero intention of seeing a real energy bill through, especially before November. These people will undermine the troops and our national economic and energy security at any cost.

  2. #2
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:03 pm, CantCureStupid said:

    My response is to curse fluently, which I will do in the privacy of my own home. I do not wish to offend Michelle or her commenters.

    But, DAMMIT!!!! This cannot be allowed to stand. I will stand in shame now because Charlie Melancon is my rep in Congress… I knew that he would probably run unopposed and I didn’t put my papers in (school, family, job, blah blah blah). My bad… I’m sorry.

    I assure you, in two years, that turkey will have to deal with ME!!

  3. #3
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:05 pm, Romeo13 said:

    The Dems are banking on the idea that the American electorate is stupid…

    Its their mantra… divide… and prevail… because the people are not smart enough to see through our transparent tactics…

    What will be interesting is how the MSM spins this.

  4. #4
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:10 pm, NotaSlickFan said:

    A strong national energy policy is essential to our nations national security. Pelosi and company are playing games with our country’s future. Imagine what the future holds if BHO/Biden win in November. Frightening.

  5. #5
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:16 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    I’m real disappointed in Bob Inglis.

  6. #6
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:17 pm, johnsteele said:

    Another step down the liberal path to the ruin of America.

  7. #7
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:20 pm, powerpro said:

    I’m pleased to see that my congressman, David Davis, did not vote for this atrocity.

    Please God, give the Republicans in the Senate, and a few Democrats, a BACKBONE to stand up to this crap!

  8. #8
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:22 pm, right_on said:

    Watch which alternative energy solutions get the most support by the Dems, then keep an eye on the rich friends of the Dems. Any guess where their money will be going?

    You don’t really think all those Dems were idle on their multi-week vacation, do you? WATCH THE MONEY…..

  9. #9
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:23 pm, prendad said:

    AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHKKKKKKKKKK!!!!!!!!

  10. #10
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:25 pm, realitycheck said:

    Keep putting pressure on the Senate’s sellout Gang of [Fill-in-the-blank).

    Traitors

  11. #11
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:26 pm, Flyoverman said:

    My letter to my Congressman….

    You voted for HR 6899? Why? It is a joke that accomplishes ZERO. I want the government to get the &&&& out of the way and let energy exploration go forward. I want the U.S. energy independent in ten years. You, your party and your 9% apporval rating, heading for 5% is not getting the job done.

    As we say in business. If you cannot get it done your replacement will. Can you tell my patience is at an end?

    And while I am at it, if the Congress wants to find who is at fault for the financial mess, they only need to look in the mirror. We do not need a House investigation. We need a special prosecutor. He can start with Chris Dodd and Charley Rangel.

  12. #12
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:34 pm, TexasEngineer said:

    Well Jeb Hensarling stood his ground. Now I’ll make sure that Kay Bailey and John Cornyn know which way the wind blows.

    As for the rest of them…I shant waste breath cussing them. I would rather just go to bed and rise to a new day.

    G’nite all…keep the faith!

  13. #13
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:39 pm, Texhoma said:

    15 Republicans need to receive ‘Pink Slips’ in November.

    Hopefully it can be stopped in the Senate.

  14. #14
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:46 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    My representative, John Sullivan (R) of Oklahoma, voted against the bill. However, our sole Democrat in the Oklahoma delegation, Dan Boren, voted for the useless legislation. This is going to the newspaper so we can ask, “Why?”

    ECS

    http://theturkeyfootbrand.blogspot.com/

  15. #15
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:49 pm, PhillytoDC said:

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Nancy Pelosi is the best thing to happen to the Republican Party since Ronald W. Reagan. Good show ol’ lady!

  16. #16
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:49 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    I am seriously lacking in my understanding of the law with regard to offshore drilling. If international waters extends out to 12 miles, then how does an entiry such as California or a local entity such as Santa Barbara determine what happens 50 miles offshore?

    Or am I just way off base that there is no correlation between surface and seafloor?

  17. #17
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:50 pm, PhillytoDC said:

    P.S. Blow this bill out of the water!

  18. #18
    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:12 am, K2 said:

    my reaction - Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

    At least my Representative voted NO. My Senators are another story. Sorry, but I will have to send the Republican back, if I can. His Dem opponent is Al Franken!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    I really need to move out of the Socialist Republic of Minnesota.

  19. #19
    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:16 am, Sanddog said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:49 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    I am seriously lacking in my understanding of the law with regard to offshore drilling. If international waters extends out to 12 miles, then how does an entiry such as California or a local entity such as Santa Barbara determine what happens 50 miles offshore?

    In 1983 President Reagan
    declared the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (which claimed rights for the United States to all waters up to 200 nautical miles (230 statute
    miles or 370 kilometers) from the U.S. coastline. In 1994 the International Law of the Sea granted the same 200 nautical miles to all countries.

  20. #20
    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:34 am, Brian72 said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:16 am, Sanddog said:

    In 1983 President Reagan
    declared the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (which claimed rights for the United States to all waters up to 200 nautical miles (230 statute
    miles or 370 kilometers) from the U.S. coastline. In 1994 the International Law of the Sea granted the same 200 nautical miles to all countries.

    The legacy continues.
    Now, the USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) declares a U.S. Exclusive Ass Whooping Zone extending anywhere we damn well please, any time we feel like it.

    God Bless you all, and God bless America!

  21. #21
    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:35 am, emjem24 said:

    What is pathetically sad is that the Dems see “doing nothing” as something. We can’t drill for oil and get off of foreign oil. This is just a big game to the Dems.

    These people don’t care about Americans just about getting elected. This lack of action will doom our country.

    We are so vulnerable as a country and if Iran makes good on its promise to do a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz we’re SCREWED.

    And the reaction of the Dems? More nonsense about how drilling won’t solve anything.

    UN.FREAKING.BELIEVABLE.

  22. #22
    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:36 am, powerpro said:

    I thought I had posted this here but apparently not…

    My Senator, Bob Corker, is one of these capitulators.

    How do I get him to stop this madness?

  23. #23
    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:37 am, constructionbook said:

    Living in Hawaii, my Senators and
    Representatives NEVER vote in a way
    that I’d approve of… and I’m sure all
    their votes on this No-Drilling follow
    in the same vein!
    When I write them and Object… they
    writed me back with Smoke and Mirrors,
    Never Responding to my Objections…

    Frustratedly…
    karl and the girls

  24. #24
    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:44 am, Brian72 said:

    Hey, powerpro Corker is my Senator also. GO VOLS!

    Ace has a post on this here.

    Here is Corker’s digits:
    Sen. Bob Corker (TN) — 202-224-3344 — 423-756-2757

    Here is my response to the news in an earlier thread here:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 1:24 pm, Brian72 said:

    Dammit, Corker! Get your head out of your a$$ and get with the program!

    WE WANT TO WIN, NOT COMPROMISE WITH THESE MARXIST JERKS!

    I DID NOT VOTE FOR YOU FOR THIS CRAP!

    STAND UP AND FIGHT! FIGHT FOR BOUNTIFUL AMERICA! FIGHT LIKE A MAN(or a woman from Alaska) AND TAKE THESE JERKS HEAD ON!!

    As you can tell, I was less than thrilled. :roll:

  25. #25
    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:46 am, Brenda said:

    On behalf of all Californians I apologize. All I can ask is that everyone vote for rep congress, so that we can take back the house and get a new speaker.

  26. #26
    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:47 am, emjem24 said:

    One more thing: what about refineries? Would this poor excuse of a bill address our refining capacity?

    Doesn’t it just give you guys a thrill to know that these dimwits voted in another tax increase for us overburdened consumers who are already dealing with other inflationary costs? This is just ridiculous. First the bailout and this crap.

    I want liberals to explain to me how this bill benfits hard-working Americans IN ANY WAY. I’m tired of this crap.

  27. #27
    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:49 am, Brian72 said:

    Here’s something from The Corner @ NRO.
    Spread the word, and let’s kill this nonsense!

    Energy Gangsterism [Iain Murray]

    The House is about to start debating its version of the aptly-named “Gang of Ten Sixteen Twenty’s” purported compromise Energy Bill. Anyone who believes this is a pro-drilling bill is fooling themselves. It allows a tiny amount of drilling while pushing forward all the fever dreams of the anti-energy environmentalist movement. I urge everyone to read Marlo Lewis’ post on this from Planet Gore yesterday. Note in particular that the bill will:

    *
    Permanently ban access to about 97 percent of the undersea oil lying within 50 miles of the California coast.
    *
    Continue the ban on energy production in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico.
    *
    Impose a brand-new ban on oil and gas leases in Alaska’s coastal waters out to 50 miles.
    *
    Not allow states that approve new leases beyond 50 miles to share royalties with the federal government, thus stripping any financial incentive for states to stand up to environmental pressure groups, who will continue to agitate against any new oil and gas operations offshore.

    This is not a compromise. It is a sell-out to the anti-energy gangsters.

    Note the bold line about Alaska. Our Powerful Pipeline Princess Sarah isn’t going to like that. Not. One. Bit.

    The Democrats are sitting ducks on this energy issue. WE HAVE %70 OF THE PEOPLE ON OUR SIDE HERE! WHY THE HELL SHOULD ANYONE COMPROMISE WITH THE LOSERS, AGAINST %70 OF AMERICA!

    DAMMIT CRAPWEASEL RINOS, WAKE UP!

  28. #28
    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:52 am, emjem24 said:

    Brenda said:
    On behalf of all Californians I apologize. All I can ask is that everyone vote for rep congress, so that we can take back the house and get a new speaker.

    That’s the plan. I’m an absentee voter in NY so I’m not sure how far my vote will go. With senators like Chucky Schmucky (thank you Mark Levin) and Shrillary it’s hard to believe that there’s any hope for my home state.

    Then again, you’ve got Feinstein and Boxer so I feel your pain too.

    Hugs… and keep the faith. :smile:

  29. #29
    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:54 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    The Dems are so deranged that they want the country to be destroyed just because they believe that George Bush wants to protect it. It’s the old “cut of nose to spite face” syndrome.

  30. #30
    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:59 am, doubleplusundead said:

    Don’t waste your time on the Dem bill, start applying pressure on the Gang of Twenty or we’re going to get sold out again. This is an Amnesty-level sellout, and we can’t let it happen.

  31. #31
    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:59 am, Brian72 said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:47 am, emjem24 said:

    One more thing: what about refineries? Would this poor excuse of a bill address our refining capacity?

    I don’t even have to look to know it doesn’t help with refining.
    Who is it that always ties up refinery construction or expansion in a tangle of endless lawsuits? Environmental lobbyists and lawyers.
    What political party do you suppose they are in bed with?
    You get one guess.

    Also, how is cheaper gas going to make you save the planet against your will by trading in your Chevy Tahoes for those stupid little chicklets with wheels that couldn’t out-tow a lawn tractor?

  32. #32
    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:09 am, Brian72 said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:52 am, emjem24 said:

    With senators like Chucky Schmucky (thank you Mark Levin)

    Mark Levin is awesome. I am listening to tonight’s program on my WMP right now. :smile:

    He’s going to interview the attorney representing Republicans in the Alaska legislature who are suing over the Tasergate attempt to ruin Sarah Palin. You can’t have a better defender than him.

    Go get ‘em, Great One!

  33. #33
    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:12 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:09 am, Brian72 said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:52 am, emjem24 said:


    Mark Levin is awesome.

    Brian,
    I’m right there with you, my friend. Thank God for Mark. May God bless us with many more in his mold…

  34. #34
    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:17 am, Brian72 said:

    I think Mark Levin is uniquely talented at ripping liberalism apart.

    He’s been great on the Democrats and Fannie-Freddie the last couple of days, too.

    One name for you: JAMIE GORELICK
    Remember her?

  35. #35
    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:19 am, powerpro said:

    I <3 Mark Levin.

    I wonder what his name for Corker would be…I haven’t heard him mention him by name but I bet it’d be FUNNY.

  36. #36
    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:21 am, powerpro said:

    Whoops…I forgot to give props where due:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:44 am, Brian72 said:

    Hey, powerpro Corker is my Senator also. GO VOLS!

    Thanks Brian! Go Vols and Titans!!!

  37. #37
    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:22 am, Brian72 said:

    Bob Porker Corker, maybe?

  38. #38
    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:22 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:17 am, Brian72 said:

    ………
    One name for you: JAMIE GORELICK
    Remember her?

    She was the one supposedly responsible for the “wall” between the FBI and CIA. I think…

  39. #39
    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:26 am, Brian72 said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:22 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    She was the one supposedly responsible for the “wall” between the FBI and CIA. I think…

    Yes that’s her. Well, after that she went to one of the Fannie-Freddies for a few years and walked away with $25 million in bonuses based on fraudulent bookeeping to trigger those bonuses.

  40. #40
    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:31 am, AlohaGuy said:

    Yes that’s her. Well, after that she went to one of the Fannie-Freddies for a few years and walked away with $25 million in bonuses based on fraudulent bookeeping to trigger those bonuses.

    Should be in jail.

  41. #41
    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:35 am, AlohaGuy said:

    That’s right Pelosi, a hoax drilling bill just when an Alaskan (read drilling) Governor is running against your party and the public is in favor of drilling. Further proof the Dems have donned the Cloak of Stupidity.

  42. #42
    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:38 am, Brian72 said:

    Wow. That lawyer in Alaska is going to nuke Tasergate. They’ve got nothing on Sarah. Her enemies at home have linked up with the Obamatrons who have parachuted in there since she got nominated, and they are sloppily flailing around with this, without regard to the Alaska Constitution. As Mark Levin said, this is a Stalinist railroad job, by the usual Stalinist characters.

  43. #43
    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:44 am, bender said:

    The DNC cannot fool anyone now. They made themselves perfectly clear in Denver for the whole nation to see, “we can’t drill our way out of this… we use 25% of the world’s oil” bla bla bla.

    Beat this thing, then run their own words down their throats. This is our issue, they didn’t lead, we will.

  44. #44
    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:52 am, FamilyMan said:

    700 billion dollars leaving this country every year for foreign oil and they’re playing GOTCHA.

  45. #45
    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:53 am, FamilyMan said:

    TRAITORS

  46. #46
    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:55 am, T J Green said:

    Hell yes - I question their patriotism!

  47. #47
    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:57 am, Valiant said:

    You know, McCain has a woody to be part of the gang of 20.

    It wouldn’t be prudent.

  48. #48
    On September 17th, 2008 at 2:01 am, Brian72 said:

    Nancy just just jumped into the waters of American energy policy with a chum suit on. I think there might be a barracuda stalking her, quietly, just out of sight.

    Man, I would hate to be Nancy. :cool:

  49. #49
    On September 17th, 2008 at 2:02 am, FamilyMan said:

    They don’t love this country.
    They don’t love our constitution.
    They actively work at destroying this country
    TRAITORS

  50. #50
    On September 17th, 2008 at 2:10 am, FamilyMan said:

    For seventy years the world has fought wars over oil. Now our enemy is with in us.
    TRAITORS

  51. #51
    On September 17th, 2008 at 2:15 am, FamilyMan said:

    If your in California work with this group.
    http://www.soscalifornia.org/solution.html

  52. #52
    On September 17th, 2008 at 5:30 am, graysonret said:

    Another one of those useless gestures to be used before election day, to convince people who don’t know what’s going on, that they are doing something. Personally, I think it’s an insult to intelligent Americans. I despise politicians that put themselves first over the country and its citizens.

  53. #53
    On September 17th, 2008 at 6:55 am, St. Louis Blue said:

    The bill prohibits drilling less than 50 miles offshore when the sponsors know that, to give an example, 95% of the known reserves off the coast of California are less than 50 miles out.

    So there’s more drilling going on in Barney Frank’s Dupont Circle brothel than happens more than 50 miles offshore? Yeccch.

  54. #54
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:21 am, Rohan said:

    Well, I think the term “traitors” being thrown around here is pretty $^@*(* appropriate. We have the resources!!! They are purposefully cutting us off from them! Why!

    I’ve already sent my email to Elizabeth Dole, my Senator (who has been an enormous disappointment), that is in the Gang of 20.

    David Price is my congressman so there is no point writing to him.

  55. #55
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:21 am, CO2 Producer said:

    I searched the bill for the word “drill,” and it came up eight times (including six times in “SEC. 124. RESOURCE ESTIMATES AND LEASING PROGRAM MANAGEMENT INDICATORS,” where the Secretary of the Interior gives Congress annual reports regarding the status of Federal oil and gas leases, permits, and existing wells). As a famous man once said, “Well, lah dee frickin’ dah!”

    There’s more to the bill than just that, of course. The word “green” appears 71 times (albeit, one was a reference to Gene Green of Texas). We can hope that maybe it will get some good chuckles on its way out to the Senate recycling bin.

    The ‘Rats want to continue their grand experiment in shoving biofuels and alternative-energy technologies down our gullets (and into our wallets) without a proven, economically or socially successful methodology. Throw a bunch of monetary and environmental green at the problem and see what sticks. The bill is essentially adding a 5-gallon bucket of water to a teaspoon of oil, for lack of a better analogy. Compromise, my tuchus.

  56. #56
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:27 am, bloggerfan62 said:

    One more thing….
    Remember that Pelosi invested 100K in T.Boone Pickens Clean Energy Corp (that is in the wind wnergy biz).
    So follow the money…. here’s 2 key points from the Dem’s phoney bill:

    — Provide tax credits for wind and solar energy industries, the development of cellulose ethanol and other biofuels.

    — Require utilities nationwide to generate 15 percent of their electricity from solar, wind or other alternative energy source.

    So T. Boone’s company will get tax credits AND Utility Companies have to buy them…nice..

  57. #57
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:32 am, iamsaved said:

    To parapharase the now oft repeated question made by Barack Obama - Do they think we’re stupid?

    At least my representative voted against this gutless bill.

    The Democrat’s first and foremost priortiy is re-election at any cost. Even if it means losing a war; increasing our energy dependence on countries who are our enemies in the war on terrorism; and having the economy tank. That’s how they generate votes.

    Cut and Run should be their campaign slogan.

  58. #58
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:46 am, DesertLover said:

    They have been pushing solar and wind and all the other stuff for over 20 years and it is still too expensive and not feasible as a full replacement to the currently used energy producing methods …

    As an example of the non-feasibility of this … read this excerpt from the monthly newsletter of one of the electric companies in Phoenix … note that the proposed grid will take up 18000 square feet (almost 1/2 an acre which is bigger than most home lots in cities) … and will provide next to nothing (1/4) of the power requirements for the entrance area of the arena where it will be used …

    From APS newsletter

    Planet Orange Going Green: Suns, APS Team Up on Solar Power Project

    Planet Orange is going green thanks to a powerful partnership between APS, the Phoenix Suns and the City of Phoenix. A recent press conference announced plans to install a major solar photovoltaic (PV) system on the fifth level of the US Airways Center parking garage in 2009.

    Plans call for a 1,125-panel, 194-kilowatt solar photovoltaic system, which will generate enough electricity to power a quarter of the arena’s Casino Arizona Pavilion, the 50-foot high glass enclosed grand entrance on the northwest corner of US Airways Center. The system will cover approximately 18,000 square feet and will produce 331,233 kilowatt-hours each year.

  59. #59
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:46 am, guitarplayer said:

    Thirteen Democrats bucked their leadership and voted against the measure.

    I sign of intelligence. Maybe there is hope for them. ;-)

    Seriously, start calling your senators and tell them not to let this bill pass as-is.

  60. #60
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:53 am, tarpon said:

    I must have missed Fuehrer Nancy’s hearings, anybody have a link to when they were?

    Pretend energy bill, pretend democracy, pretend ethics, pretend she works for the American people — All Nancy seems to do is pretend.

  61. #61
    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:08 am, CO2 Producer said:

    I’ve seen the T. Boone commercial, the one where he goes, “Gimme alla yer money — yeehaw!” while dancing around, slapping his cowboy hat on his rump.

    OK, not exactly, but that’s how it looked to me.

  62. #62
    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:17 am, JDinTX said:

    So glad to see my congressman voting against the hoax. It’s time to get serious with this problem and do it right.

  63. #63
    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:18 am, Chief RZ said:

    I hope the patriotic US citizens throw out these social-democrats this November. Sellouts. Delusional and anit-American communists.

  64. #64
    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:20 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    I’m livid. I’ve contacted five of the sell-outs already. I’ll deal with the rest of them later. After I cool off and calm down.

  65. #65
    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:35 am, flaming_o said:

    This is what I mean by appeasement! We sit idle on so much God-given natural resource and do nothing NOTHING! to stick the OPEC and the jihadis in the eye. Representative government! Representing anybody EVERYBODY! except the American people. Disgusting.

  66. #66
    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:47 am, rooster said:

    Absolute sham of a bill. Yet the party of pelosi will blame the republicans and forget to tell the us that this bill is designe to wean us off oil.
    You trolls on this site, I pray you wake up and realize how wrong the dims are about virtually everything!

  67. #67
    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:49 am, pianotchr said:

    My 15 year old daughter pegged this exactly - after hearing the details of the bill, she said “It’s a DINO … Drilling in name only.” Goes well with the RINOs who helped pass this.

  68. #68
    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:53 am, happyscrapper said:

    So President Bush will veto it and we will be back where we started. What worries me is…would McCain veto it if he were President? He has my vote, but sadly, I still don’t trust him. He is too much into appeasing the other side for my taste. What he calls compromise I call giving in to the other side, big time!

  69. #69
    On September 17th, 2008 at 9:06 am, Valiant said:

    Rhan,

    I feel your pain- we share the same representatives in Congress. Liddy Dole is also 100% on board with the global warming loons.

    At least she finally did the right thing on immigration.

  70. #70
    On September 17th, 2008 at 9:12 am, lgm said:

    I’m sorry the Democrats passed a sham bill, but I’m glad they didn’t promote offshore drilling. I’m happy to make you take the bus to keep my beach derrick free. Trade in that old pickup for a cute European Vespa scooter. Now there’s a babe magnet.

    ps. I take the bus already, it’s only you I want to annoy.

  71. #71
    On September 17th, 2008 at 9:18 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    Could the Democrats come up with a more BS name than they did?

    Comprehensive American Energy Security and Consumer Protection Act

    If irony were the point of that bill’s title, they hit the nail on the head.

    I have some solace in the fact that my Dem Rep voted against it. Though it remains to be seen why.

  72. #72
    On September 17th, 2008 at 9:25 am, happyscrapper said:

    I guess the democrats think it is just fine to send billions of dollars over to people who hate us and want us dead. Personally, I would like us to drill, drill, drill. As would 70% of the American people. That is part of the reason we will win big in this election…the Presidency AND Congress. It becomes more clear every day.

  73. #73
    On September 17th, 2008 at 9:26 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    lgm said:

    I’m sorry the Democrats passed a sham bill, but I’m glad they didn’t promote offshore drilling. I’m happy to make you take the bus to keep my beach derrick free.

    Glad you’re all for continuing to buy oil from people who want to kill us. What beach on the Caspian Sea was that again Vlad?

  74. #74
    On September 17th, 2008 at 9:41 am, abqalan said:

    It really is all ’bout you, isn’t it LGM?

  75. #75
    On September 17th, 2008 at 9:47 am, pueblo1032 said:

    These CLOWNS in charge of Washington are a JOKE…I would laugh if it were not so sad… This SHAM should not pass, and if it does it MUST be VETOED… They do not get it, just like IMMIGRATION, they do not get DRILL HERE, DRILL NOW… Not in someplace with no OIL, but someplace with OIL… GOT THAT???

  76. #76
    On September 17th, 2008 at 9:54 am, guitarplayer said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 9:12 am, lgm said:

    I’m sorry the Democrats passed a sham bill, but I’m glad they didn’t promote offshore drilling.

    Me too. I’m very glad they did this. Why? They’ll pay for it come November. :lol:

  77. #77
    On September 17th, 2008 at 9:55 am, abqalan said:

    The President has threatened a veto. We can only hope he is true to his word.

  78. #78
    On September 17th, 2008 at 10:01 am, almeehan said:

    I’m pleased to see that my congressman, David Davis, did not vote for this atrocity.

    Please God, give the Republicans in the Senate, and a few Democrats, a BACKBONE to stand up to this crap!

    unfortunately Davis just got voted out to another Republican

  79. #79
    On September 17th, 2008 at 10:07 am, torabora said:

    I want those rigs placed off the California coast right where Babs can see them from her bedroom window!

  80. #80
    On September 17th, 2008 at 10:12 am, JT said:

    Ah November. I didn’t think it was possible to do less than nothing, but the Dems make the Republicans look great by comparison.

  81. #81
    On September 17th, 2008 at 10:14 am, JP_Texan said:

    I am sick and tired of being in one of the states that is carrying the rest of the counrty’s unquenchable thirst for oil. The Left’s quivering about the environment is just blatantly false. New systems, drilling methods and processes are keeping it clean.

    Just look at the Gulf of Mexico over the last few weeks. It just went through two of the largest hurricanes on record in Gustav and Ike and not a drop was spilled.

    Dril now… Drill everywhere… Remove us from the bloodthirsty clutches of the Middle East zealots.

  82. #82
    On September 17th, 2008 at 10:15 am, TxSkirt said:

    Brian72 I lived in Knoxville when the bloodbath that was the 2006 election took place and voted for Mr. Corker. I am highly disturbed by his willingness to compromise with the Dems. I sent him a letter telling him my sentiments. He sent me back a very long letter telling me how he REALLY is a conservative. Right.

    I now reside back in the Great State of Texas and am saddled with a 26 year dem-o-crap house member that votes in lock step w/Pelosi. He never responds to my e-mails and the local paper won’t print anything negative about him. I am working hard to get him un-employed this year.

    America is a great country. If our representatives stop representing us, we can get rid of them.

  83. #83
    On September 17th, 2008 at 10:15 am, Mister P said:

    I hope McCain doesn’t follow through and work with the Democrats, because any effort to do so will only prop up their own insanity at our expense.

  84. #84
    On September 17th, 2008 at 10:16 am, Rob said:

    I’m sorry the Democrats passed a sham bill, but I’m glad they didn’t promote offshore drilling. I’m happy to make you take the bus to keep my beach derrick free.

    I lived in Santa Barbara for years and the oil rigs way out at sea were actually pretty with their lights twinkling at night. Every once in a while they would vent natural gas and light it on fire and it was like a candle burning …. I actually enjoyed seeing them at night, and during the day they were really not even visible.

  85. #85
    On September 17th, 2008 at 10:25 am, 7thson said:

    President Bush must veto this piece of crap legislation and throw it back in Pelosi and Reed’s faces. He needs to take the Gang of Idiots behind closed doors and beat the living crap out of them until they get in line. He needs to use the bully pulpit and get the word to the American people that the Congress is selling us down the river.

    Then I woke up and realized that a RINO is not going to act like a conservative with only three months left in office.

    We are so screwed…

  86. #86
    On September 17th, 2008 at 10:29 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    In looking at my Reps web page, I see a linked spreadsheet describing how we supposedly have 2% of the world’s “proved” oil reserves, yet we use 25% of the produced oil.

    Here’s the link…

    What I’d like help with is demonstrating that this is a farce.

    You’ll see that since 1980. the number for the US has actually gone DOWN according to this report. Yet Canada and other nations have increased dramatically as of 2003.

    The report says we have 20.972 billion barrels of reserve.

    My understanding is that 18 billion barrels are known to be off limits today.

    And this does not take into account the trillions of cubic feet of natural gas.

    My belief, and I need some facts to back it up, is that these numbers are old, outdated and just wrong. Isn’t it that case that the Dept of Energy still uses ancient maps to determine what our reserves are?

    Who else has useful info on this? Thanks.

  87. #87
    On September 17th, 2008 at 11:02 am, DBNinKY said:

    Me too. I’m very glad they did this. Why? They’ll pay for it come November.

    You know it! They’ll also be taken to task in November for increasing poverty in the coal fields of Appalachia by vilifying coal as unclean and unsafe!

  88. #88
    On September 17th, 2008 at 11:07 am, powerpro said:

    What is the name and number for this bill in the Senate?

  89. #89
    On September 17th, 2008 at 11:07 am, Dan Lee said:

    I especially liked the affirmative action section of the “Sugar Pill Drill Bill“..

    SEC. 109. SMALL, WOMAN-OWNED, AND MINORITY-OWNED BUSINESSES.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) is amended by adding at the end the following:

    `(q) Opportunities for Leasing- The Secretary shall establish goals to ensure equal opportunity to bid on offshore leases for qualified small, women-owned, and minority-owned exploration and production companies and may implement, where appropriate, outreach programs for qualified historically underutilized exploration and production companies to participate in the bidding process for offshore leases.

    Nancy Placebo (D)Calif.

  90. #90
    On September 17th, 2008 at 11:10 am, jamesgreenidge said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 10:14 am, JP_Texan said:

    Just look at the Gulf of Mexico over the last few weeks. It just went through two of the largest hurricanes on record in Gustav and Ike and not a drop was spilled.

    But you know, even if a thousand gallons spilled — so what?? It’s not Doomsday and the Earth won’t even know it happened except for a couple of media-grabbing oily ducks. Really! A worker at Indian Point once remarked at our school board that if a bucket of water as radioactive as a couple of old fashioned watches from a generator cleaning job was spilled, the NYC media would be pouncing like wailing tigers on them — the same people who want to see drivers on the NY Thruway enjoy the romantic sight of windmills all the way from Tappan to Albany — whose total wattage tiny Indian Point (just 1 reactor on there!) discretely handles.

    James Greenidge
    Queens New York

    Our brave soldiers fight and die so caribou can frolic and screw in peace.

  91. #91
    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:04 pm, walterc said:

    NJ Aviator, I noticed that the footnote on Canada mentioned the tar sands as included in the reserve total, but it didn’t mention the shale oil in the Green River formation in Co, Wy & Ut (among other smaller areas).

    This website http://ostseis.anl.gov/guide/oilshale/index.cfm&gt; estimates between 1.2 & 1.8 Trillion (with a “T”) barrels of oil in the Green River oil shale formation.

  92. #92
    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:18 pm, dkrising said:

    I’d also like to know what the companion Senate legislation is. I’ve sent a note to Norm Coleman (R-When It’s Convenient), but couldn’t find anything on THOMAS or his site about the Gang of (100-# of Conservative Republicans). Any info?

  93. #93
    On September 17th, 2008 at 12:47 pm, dadinseattle said:

    To quote a famous Alaskan Governor
    “You people are in need of some adult supervision” (congress)

    and to quote another famous General they are
    “Stuck on stupid!”

    No re-election for sham artists should be the standard e-mail message for these new Dems that are up for election this time!

  94. #94
    On September 17th, 2008 at 1:13 pm, Devil's Advocate said:
  95. #95
    On September 17th, 2008 at 3:01 pm, doppelganglander said:

    I just emailed my two senators, Isakson and Chambliss, who were among the first on board with this travesty. Chambliss is up for reelection and I told him in no uncertain terms I would not be voting for him if he doesn’t change his tune. These two flipped on amnesty after a little public pressure, so there may be hope.

  96. #96
    On September 17th, 2008 at 5:28 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    one can only hope that the dems feel it at the ballot box and feel it hard…hand them their pink slips!!!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Cap-and-Tax Watch: Protests across the country

July 3, 2009 10:08 AM by Michelle Malkin

43 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Here is the cap-and-tax “placeholder:” Where’s the fine print?

July 1, 2009 02:24 PM by Michelle Malkin

93 Comments | 23 Trackbacks

Transparency my foot.

Video: EPA dissenter Alan Carlin speaks

June 30, 2009 07:13 PM by Michelle Malkin

82 Comments | 16 Trackbacks

Cap-and-Tax 8 Watch: Follow the money

June 30, 2009 09:34 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 18 Trackbacks

Green.

Mark Kirk is doing what?!

June 29, 2009 05:59 PM by Michelle Malkin

49 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Job killer.


Categories: Democrats, Enviro-nitwits, Nancy Pelosi



Power Line

» Clerical Cracks

The Other McCain

» Don't feed the sharks