PDS Alert: Us Weekly and friends are at it again

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 16, 2008 04:27 AM


Photoshop: David Lunde

Left-wing bloggers have unearthed a new, Deep Important Issue to wield against Sarah Palin:

The personal tanning bed she installed at the governor’s mansion in Alaska.

She bought the used tanning bed from a health club with her own money.

So, what is the point?

Oh, wait, there is none.

But it’s a great opportunity for Palin-haters to mock her looks again and for Obama cultist publisher Jann Wenner to use Us Weekly to bash Palin again:

Some of the nutroots haters seriously argue that Palin’s tanning bed is a sign of “elitism” akin to John Edwards’ $400 haircuts.

Here’s the TPM Muckraker blog clucking its tongue:

“The news of Palin’s luxurious purchase — beds can cost as much as $35,000 — presents a sharp contrast to the blue-collar persona she projects on the campaign trail.”

Can they be more out of touch? Tanning beds have long been derided as “white trash” and “redneck.”

The “elitist” thing to do would have been for Sarah to have hired a personal umbrella carrier to shield her from the sun.

Next up: Us Weekly and company investigate the Sarah Palin’s eyebrow waxing appointments, Todd Palin’s beard grooming preferences, and the children’s dental hygiene habits.

America must know the truth!

***

Allahpundit points out the health benefits of tanning beds non-Alaskans have ignored. Having lived in Seattle for more than three years, I know exactly what light deprivation does!

***
On a related note, Us Weekly has now gone to Amazon.com for help in boosting its sagging circulation after its Palin-bashing debacle. (Guess the five-free issue offer from the rag’s customer service department flopped.)

A reader sends the e-mail notice he received yesterday from Amazon.com.

Check it out:

Posted in: Sarah Palin

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. ScoopThis.Org » SMEAR: Sarah Palin bought a tanning bed.
  2. Sarah Got Game, We Got Sarah! « Riggword Weblog
  3. Media Reduced. Maybe They Need A Tan Themselves » Pirate’s Cove — Barracuda Patrol!
  4. Media Reduced. Maybe They Need A Tan Themselves : Stop The ACLU
  5. This ain’t Hell, but you can see it from here » Blog Archive » Today’s Palin scandal
  6. silent E speaks - Conservatively Speaking from Western Waukesha County » The Latest On Palin: Tanning Bed Gate!!!!
  7. JammieWearingFool
  8. Jules Crittenden » Luxury Bad
  9. Sarah Palin Watch: Why Readers Should Continue to Dump Us Magazine Tanning Bed Edition | FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog
  10. PDS Alert: Us Weekly and friends are at it again « Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian
  11. Snapped Shot
  12. The College Politico » Blog Archive » Oprah pulls an “Us Weekly” and pisses off fans by dissing Palin UPDATE: (many) Others jump on the “Us Weekly” boat
  13. SCANDAL!!! | Cold Fury
  14. ‘Okie’ on the Lam » Blog Archive » Why Liberals Hate Sarah Palin So Very, Very Much — It’s That “Growin’ Up Thang” . . .
  15. Photog self-captured hitting McCain over the head « Full Metal Cynic
  16. Proof Obama Is A Muslim | Democrat=Socialist
  17. Palin round-up | Civil Commotion
  18. Sarah Palin’s “First Dude” : BigMouthFrog
  19. Scandalous! Truly Scandalous! | sassafrassin.com
  20. Palin in the news « Palinmania!
  21. A Small Corner of Sanity - An Online Oasis for Conservative Thought
  22. Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection (58 Cases) « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  23. Palin Puzzles Progressive People: « Riggword Weblog
  24. Apparently, PDS Sufferers Have Never Heard of SAD or Vitamin D Deficiency at Haemet

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #456880
    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:41 am, edelweiss said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:06 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    Re: the media’s lack of access to Palin.

    Why do you think the campaign won’t let her talk to the media?

    Excellent question! The answer is easy. She is totally clueless on economy, domestic and foreign policy issues and it would be a disgrace to [s]elect somebody like her. She is probably not as dumb as Bush, still she is not the right person for the job. I’m pretty much sure she cannot even find Asia or Europe on a map, let alone understand what’s going on overseas.

  2. #456881
    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:41 am, thejim said:

    Obama and his supporters, media included, are completely rattled and hysterical simply because they genuinely do not understand the people that they expect to rule, not lead, but rule.

  3. #456884
    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:42 am, love2rumba said:

    Time to put ‘em out of business

  4. #456892
    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:45 am, FirstSkirt said:

    Sarah looked so good out here in Colorado! She had a HUGE crowd, but I looked in the Rocky Mountaini News, and sure enough, the photo is taken so as not to show the crowds–there were groups of women there holding up tubes of lipstick! On the other hand, photos of Obama were taken from a distance to give the appearance of these gigantic turnouts–it is very deceptive. All of the photos of Obama were much bigger than those of Sarah. Anyway, she looked very fit, trim, professional, and tanned—-you go, girl!

  5. #456894
    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:46 am, rightwingrocker said:

    Clueless?

    How about saying that tanning beds run up to $35,000 when a REALLY fancy one goes for maybe $5000-6000?

    It’s YOUR side that’s clueless. If Bill Clinton having multiple sexual partners (which I honestly couldn’t care about myself) wasn’t an issue, then why the hell are you people braying like donkeys over a stupid TANNING BED?

    Vice President Palin has a WAY better understanding of the economy and the world than either of the losers on the opposing ticket. What the hell are you thinking?

    You forgot the /sarcasm tag, silly.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  6. #456897
    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:48 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    Ah…… she clearly articulared the basic premise of the Bush Doctrine as it relates to an imminent threat in the EDITED version released by ABC.

    Only after being given a hint by Charlie Gibson.

    Moron did you read Krauthammer’s last editorial? Nah, you didn’t; did you?

    Testy! Do you get this irritable at the grocery store when someone cuts you off? Nice internet persona…

    I did read it! Did you? He wrote:

    Yes, Sarah Palin didn’t know what it is. But neither does Charlie Gibson.

    All he confirmed is that Charlie Gibson is a pretentious doofus. We all knew that already.

  7. #456898
    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:49 am, rightwingrocker said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:45 am, FirstSkirt said:

    And she’s talking to the people that matter – the AMERICAN people.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  8. #456903
    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:51 am, happyscrapper said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:06 am, Red State Skeptic said:
    … doesn’t know the first thing about the Bush Doctrine, thinks lowering taxes is a change in policy from Bush. The woman is uninformed and unintelligent.

    First of all, you know as well as I do that the so-called Bush Doctrine never was just one specific “plan”, but just a name the media gave to many of Pres. Bush’s policies. So get off that. It has been discussed to death. I am also very tired of hearing about certain things being just a continuation of Bush. So what??? He had some very good policies that need to be continued. The only people who think George Bush is satan are the lefties. Continuing some of his policies is a GOOD thing. Cutting taxes is something George Bush did and continuing that is necessary. Four more years of the Bush Administration? Bring it on!

  9. #456905
    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:51 am, madchef said:

    Does Obama use a tanning bed?

  10. #456906
    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:51 am, Dimsdale said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 9:45 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    Can you imagine the howling over here if Joe Biden had a tanning bed? John Edwards (whose scandal I notice made the cover of “liberal” Us Weekly).

    Palin tanning means something because it goes to the heart of her style/looks over substance. She can’t be bothered to talk to reporters, shows zero knowledge of the world or our country besides rehearsed talking points, because obviously she finds tanning a better use of her time than reading.

    I recall a certain Mr. Obama found that shopping in Germany was a “better use of his time” than visiting wounded soldiers because he couldn’t make a photo op out of it.

    “Rehearsed talking points?” LOL! I have heard several instances where Obama fell apart when his teleprompter stopped feeding him lines from Axelrod.

  11. #456910
    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:54 am, rightwingrocker said:

    Four more years of the Bush Administration? Bring it on!

    OK, but please spare us the bailouts and the NCLB and the kissing liberal tushy and the presicription cards and such …

    That’s why Vice President Palin is such a breath of fresh air. She may actually take the legality of such things into consideration if she winds up in the White House.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  12. #456912
    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:54 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:06 am, Red State Skeptic said:
    So you cared about John Edwards’ grooming (I admit, hilarious) but wouldn’t pay any mind to him tanning?

    I would bet any amount of money that Edwards gets tans. And when that becomes a top story over here… then, and only then will you have a point.

    When we joked about Edwards getting a $400 haircut it really just went along with the rest of his persona. Trying to paint Palin as an elitist is an attempt to harm her image.

    Conservatives laugh at Edwards getting a $400 haircut. Liberals use Gov. Palin having purchased a USED tanning bed with her OWN money as means to discredit her. See the difference?

  13. #456916
    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:56 am, DBNinKY said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:34 am, MarcoPolo said:

    Maybe they can cost up to $35,000, but you can also buy them on eBay for $2,000.

    My uncle owns a video rental-tanning bed business and he sells his used beds on Craigslist for about five-twelve hundred, depending on their logged hours of usage.

    Also, I’ve never met or heard of anyone outside of some fear-monger report by the MSM, who claims to have been diagnosed with cancer from a tanning bed or booth.

  14. #456917
    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:56 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Why do you think the campaign won’t let her talk to the media? Read the writing on the wall: five colleges in six years, doesn’t know the first thing about the Bush Doctrine, thinks lowering taxes is a change in policy from Bush. The woman is uninformed and unintelligent.

    Someone please prove me wrong.

    Seriously.

    Everything you’ve stated has been debunked. Where do you spend your time when you aren’t here stirring the pot? Under a rock? Do your own research.

  15. #456919
    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:57 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    No, Mr. So-smart-I’m-in-a-position-to call-the-Vice-President-uninformed, YOU go find out for yourself.

    I found it! Looks like Saracuda had the gumption to veto a bill that was made unconstitional by a court order nine days earlier. An outstanding legal mind there. Is she going to debate Barack Obama on strict constructionism?

  16. #456923
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:01 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    The only people who think George Bush is satan are the lefties. Continuing some of his policies is a GOOD thing. Cutting taxes is something George Bush did and continuing that is necessary.

    I guess “lefties” make up 70%+ of our country.

    It’s not that she supports cutting taxes for the rich. It’s that she thinks Bush didn’t.

  17. #456927
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:03 am, nyk said:

    She is totally clueless on economy, domestic and foreign policy issues and it would be a disgrace to [s]elect somebody like her. She is probably not as dumb as Bush, still she is not the right person for the job. I’m pretty much sure she cannot even find Asia or Europe on a map, let alone understand what’s going on overseas.

    That’s not fair, actually: She knows where Russia is, because she can see it from her house (which means she also has national security experience!). But yeah, you’re probably right on the rest.

    I actually think that when David Brooks is questioning the candidacy of Republicans — and rarely does he do the Dems any favors — something must be amiss:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/opinion/16brooks.html?_r=3&ref=opinion&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

  18. #456928
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:03 am, happyscrapper said:

    Gov. Palin is going on Hannity…I think tonight. Of course, she will be criticized for giving an interview to a right-winger who will go easy on her. On the other hand, most lefties are afraid to go on any FOX program for fear of being crucified. Whenever I see one of them on FOX, I am under the impression they have been treated very fairly. But the left says they were “grilled”. Perception! I thought O’Reilly did a good job on Obama and brought out how obviously socialist Obama really is!

  19. #456938
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:06 am, Flyoverman said:

    Red State Skeptic said: I guess “lefties” make up 70%+ of our country.

    Refer to the answer to Question D3 of the Battleground Poll.

  20. #456942
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:09 am, rplatt said:

    The brain dead media in this country resides about 20 feet below whale excrement.

  21. #456951
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:11 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:41 am, edelweiss said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:06 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    Re: the media’s lack of access to Palin.

    Why do you think the campaign won’t let her talk to the media?

    Excellent question! The answer is easy. She is totally clueless on economy, domestic and foreign policy issues and it would be a disgrace to [s]elect somebody like her. She is probably not as dumb as Bush, still she is not the right person for the job. I’m pretty much sure she cannot even find Asia or Europe on a map, let alone understand what’s going on overseas.

    What I find completely hysterical (besides liberals in general) is the fact that they continue to espouse that she is an inexperienced idiot but also extols that we don’t know enough about her stances. Which one is it? Either you have all you need to know about her or you don’t know enough about her and are simply smearing this woman because she is Republican.

    My, my, how things have changed. At first, liberals were so “happy” over the Palin selection… “this is great for my candidate” and all that jazz. Boy, have things changed. ;-)

  22. #456955
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:13 am, sonofdy said:

    I guess “lefties” make up 70%+ of our country.

    I am very sure 70%+ of the nation does not think bush is satan. :roll:

  23. #456960
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:14 am, DBNinKY said:

    She can’t be bothered to talk to reporters… .

    Why should she? They’re doing a fine job of smearing and taking her out of context without her lying prostrate before them.

    “…shows zero knowledge of the world or our country besides rehearsed talking points… .”

    So who are you, Kreskin? Her 80% approval rating begs to differ with your presumptive judgment. It’s so tiresome when liberals try to denigrate as stupid any Republican with whom they disagree. They tried it with Ford, Reagan and the first President Bush and what did it prove? It’s old, and pointless.

    “…because obviously she finds tanning a better use of her time than reading.”

    Why? Because she’s a looks obsessed female, or because she’s a “pretty” girl?

  24. #456961
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:14 am, groundhunter said:

    Alaska has long periods of dark days. She might have the tanning bed as a means to provide the effects of sun light. The lack of sun light can cause depression for some people.

  25. #456962
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:14 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    In expecting him to think for himself, you are probably expecting too much.

    This is my favorite of the day. I do recognize that Obama going to Trinity for 20 years and being associated (albeit loosely) with a former terrorist makes him less than a perfect candidate, to put it nicely. I’m the first to admit that before it was between him and Hillary (and John Edwards), I was Mr. Barack-Obama-Give-Me-A-Break.

    Y’all on the other hand are pretty much the textbook definition of water carrier. Think about the outrageous statements you make defending Mrs. Perfect!

    Her husband was a member of a secessionist party for seven years, and all you can say is Todd Palin’s not running for VP?

    Sarah Palin attended said party’s convention in 2002 as mayor and addressed it in 2006 as governor, and you buy her excuse that it was a “courtesy?” When was the last time the gov of your state addressed his opposing party’s convention?

    Sarah Palin attended a Pat Buchanan rally wearing his button, before endorsing Steve Forbes, and you still buy the same “courtesy” excuse? Would your Republican mayor attend an Obama rally wearing his button?

    She went to 5 colleges in 6 years, and you say all that means is she likes to travel!

    Seriously, put down the water for just a second, do some critical thinking, and acknowledge this woman isn’t quite what she’s cracked up to be.

    Then explain her global warming flip flop!

  26. #456963
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:14 am, sonofdy said:

    And here come the “Palin is dumb” smears. My god, its like a broken record….

  27. #456964
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:15 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:48 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    Ah…… she clearly articulared the basic premise of the Bush Doctrine as it relates to an imminent threat in the EDITED version released by ABC.

    Only after being given a hint by Charlie Gibson.
    She asked for clarification. I guess you’ve grown accustomed to seeing someone ummm and uhh their way through an interview… Sarah’s cut of a different cloth.

    Moron did you read Krauthammer’s last editorial? Nah, you didn’t; did you?

    Testy! Do you get this irritable at the grocery store when someone cuts you off? Nice internet persona…

    I did read it! Did you? He wrote:

    Yes, Sarah Palin didn’t know what it is. But neither does Charlie Gibson.

    All he confirmed is that Charlie Gibson is a pretentious doofus. We all knew that already.

    So, then you really have no point at all.

  28. #456965
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:15 am, sonofdy said:

    Her husband was a member of a secessionist party for seven years, and all you can say is Todd Palin’s not running for VP?

    Try going to the AIP website and READING it. Stop spreading lies.

  29. #456978
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:19 am, sonofdy said:

    She went to 5 colleges in 6 years, and you say all that means is she likes to travel!

    And you have nothing that proves anything else so STOP SPREADING LIES

  30. #456982
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:19 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Looks like Saracuda had the gumption to veto a bill that was made unconstitional by a court order nine days earlier. An outstanding legal mind there. Is she going to debate Barack Obama on strict constructionism?

    Barack will be debating McCain. I don’t blame you for being confused. I’m sure you all wish she were at the top of our ticket. Maybe you will get your wish in 2012.

  31. #456984
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:20 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    RSS trolled:
    I guess “lefties” make up 70%+ of our country.

    It’s not that she supports cutting taxes for the rich. It’s that she thinks Bush didn’t.

    How many of you actually pay taxes?

  32. #456985
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:21 am, sonofdy said:

    Barack will be debating McCain.

    Amazing isn’t it how they are expending all this energy and lies on the VICE presidental candidate?

  33. #456986
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:22 am, pueblo1032 said:

    MSM, going all the way back to DEWEY/TRUMAN, have tried to pick their winner for the AMERICAN VOTER… It did not work than, and nor has it worked in subsequent elections… Unfortunately for MSM the AMERICAN VOTER isn’t quite as STUPID as they believe… Not then, not NOW…

  34. #456987
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:22 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    Try going to the AIP website and READING it. Stop spreading lies.

    Stop carrying water! They say they just want the right to vote on statehood. Right. They’re the Alaskan Independence Party. And their founder was interviewed and said: “The fires of hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government.” If he says that in interviews, imagine what he says in person!

  35. #456990
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:23 am, Goldwater Knight said:

    That’s not fair, actually: She knows where Russia is, because she can see it from her house

    Just like Obama thinks there’s 57 states!

  36. #456993
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:24 am, MikeOK said:

    Perhaps tanning beds are “white trash.” I can’t say that I’ve ever known an outspokenly liberal woman with a tan. Then again, outspokenly liberal women tend to shy away from soap, shampoo, wax, razors, and scissors as well.

  37. #456994
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:25 am, sonofdy said:

    RSS, I have read the website, clearly you have not. :roll: talking to you is pointless since you clearly are not interested in the truth.

  38. #456995
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:25 am, doppelganglander said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:06 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    five colleges in six years

    Someone please prove me wrong. Seriously.

    No problem It’s actually 4 colleges in 5 years. Via Wiki:

    In 1982, Palin enrolled at Hawaii Pacific College but left after her first semester, transferring in 1983 to North Idaho College and then to the University of Idaho. She attended Matanuska-Susitna College in Alaska for one term, returning to the University of Idaho to complete her Bachelor of Science degree in communications-journalism, graduating in 1987.[11][12]

    The reference goes to an AP article in the Anchorage paper which is inaccurately headlined “Palin education took her to five colleges.” That last stop is a RETURN to the University of Idaho. The term at Matanuska-Susitna College could very well have been a summer term. Many people who go to an out of town or out of state college pick up a couple of credits closer to home over the summer. I know it may be hard for liberal elites to understand, but a lot of people can’t afford to go four straight years to an out-of-state or private college. They may start at a community college and transfer, or do a semester or two close to home to reduce the expenses of going to school out of state. It is also common to take more than 4 years to complete a degree, especially if one is working during the school year.

  39. #456998
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:25 am, DBNinKY said:

    That’s not fair, actually: She knows where Russia is, because she can see it from her house (which means she also has national security experience!).

    For all you feminists = hypocrites: If not Vice President Palin…who? If not now…when? This is first REAL chance to elect a female to the highest office in the land, and the feminists hypocrites are trying to destroy it. It’s funny and sad all at the same time!

  40. #456999
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:26 am, Flyoverman said:

    Here is a set of numbers that has a bit more relevance than Sarah Palin’s tanning bed purchase.

    Look what Barack accomplished in three short years. And who were the primary promoters of opening up the subprime market by Fannie Mae?

    See John McCain? No, he’s about 70th on the list.

    From http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/07/top-senate-recipients-of-fanni.html

    Top Recipients of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
    Campaign Contributions, 1989-2008

    Name Office Party/State Total
    1. Dodd, Christopher J S D-CT $133,900
    2. Kerry, John S D-MA $111,000
    3. Obama, Barack S D-IL $105,849
    4. Clinton, Hillary S D-NY $75,550
    5. Kanjorski, Paul E H D-PA $65,500

    6. Bennett, Robert F S R-UT $61,499
    7. Johnson, Tim S D-SD $61,000
    8. Conrad, Kent S D-ND $58,991

    9. Davis, Tom H R-VA $55,499
    10. Bond, Christopher S S R-MO $55,400
    11. Bachus, Spencer H R-AL $55,300
    12. Shelby, Richard C S R-AL $55,000
    13. Emanuel, Rahm H D-IL $51,75014. Reed, Jack S D-RI $50,750
    15. Carper, Tom S D-DE $44,389
    16. Frank, Barney H D-MA $40,100
    17. Maloney, Carolyn B H D-NY $38,750
    18. Bean, Melissa H D-IL $37,249

    19. Blunt, Roy H R-MO $36,500
    20. Pryce, Deborah H R-OH $34,750
    21. Miller, Gary H R-CA $33,000
    22. Pelosi, Nancy H D-CA $32,750
    23. Reynolds, Tom H R-NY $32,700
    24. Hoyer, Steny H H D-MD $30,500
    25. Hooley, Darlene H D-OR $28,750

  41. #457004
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:27 am, nyk said:

    Her 80% approval rating begs to differ with your presumptive judgment.

    Actually, with all due respect, every source I’ve seen online has shown her favorability ratings plummeting. See here (and note that this references both a poll conducted by a liberal site and a nonpartisan poll):
    http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/palins-favorability-numbers-eroding.html

  42. #457005
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:27 am, beenthere said:

    Can they be more out of touch? Tanning beds have long been derided as “white trash” and “redneck.”

    Good grief. I try really hard to keep up with popular culture, but I had never heard of this one. I’ve never used a tanning bed myself but only because I try to keep my natural, pure whiteness unblemished (that’s a joke, people!), so what I’m trying to understand is why would a “redneck” want a tanning bed? Wouldn’t there be the risk of turning all red as a result?

    I’m just utterly and honestly confused regarding this. In any event, I can imagine an awful lot of “Us Weekly’s” readers using or wanting such beds.

  43. #457008
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:29 am, sonofdy said:

    http://www.akip.org/platform.html

    Try actualy reading it.

  44. #457010
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:29 am, nyk said:

    If not now…when? This is first REAL chance to elect a female to the highest office in the land, and the feminists hypocrites are trying to destroy it.

    Why would I possibly vote for a woman who opposes everything I believe in? Feminism doesn’t mean dumbly giving your vote to anyone with ovaries. That’s completely missing the point.

  45. #457011
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:29 am, RogerCfromSD said:

    A tanning bed controversy!? That she paid for!?

    I’m STILL voting for her tanned ass. Suck on that one, lib babies.

  46. #457016
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:32 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:14 am, Red State Skeptic said:
    In expecting him to think for himself, you are probably expecting too much.
    This is my favorite of the day. I do recognize that Obama going to Trinity for 20 years and being associated (albeit loosely) with a former terrorist makes him less than a perfect candidate, to put it nicely. I’m the first to admit that before it was between him and Hillary (and John Edwards), I was Mr. Barack-Obama-Give-Me-A-Break.

    Y’all on the other hand are pretty much the textbook definition of water carrier. Think about the outrageous statements you make defending Mrs. Perfect!

    Her husband was a member of a secessionist party for seven years, and all you can say is Todd Palin’s not running for VP?

    Perhaps, I’ll try your tactic on you:

    I do recognize that Todd Palin was a member of the secessionist party for seven years and being married to Palin makes her aless than a perfect candidate, to put it nicely.

    Sarah Palin attended said party’s convention in 2002 as mayor and addressed it in 2006 as governor, and you buy her excuse that it was a “courtesy?” When was the last time the gov of your state addressed his opposing party’s convention?

    Another “loose” association.

    Sarah Palin attended a Pat Buchanan rally wearing his button, before endorsing Steve Forbes, and you still buy the same “courtesy” excuse? Would your Republican mayor attend an Obama rally wearing his button?

    Loose association.

    She went to 5 colleges in 6 years, and you say all that means is she likes to travel!

    You tell us what you think we should say about this? In the meantime, can you ask Sen. Obama to release his school records from Columbia?

    Seriously, put down the water for just a second, do some critical thinking, and acknowledge this woman isn’t quite what she’s cracked up to be.

    Right back at cha!

    Then explain her global warming flip flop!

    Explain all of Obama’s flip flops? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

  47. #457018
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:32 am, happyscrapper said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:54 am, rightwingrocker said:
    OK, but please spare us the bailouts and the NCLB and the kissing liberal tushy and the presicription cards and such …That’s why Vice President Palin is such a breath of fresh air. She may actually take the legality of such things into consideration if she winds up in the White House.

    Rightwing…you are correct, of course. There are plenty of things from the Bush Administration that we DON’T want to continue for four more years! But there are also many things he did right and I still think he is better than an Obama!!! While I do think Pres. Bush has lost his way on a number of things, he still did what he thought was right and I believe history will show him in a better light.

  48. #457034
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:37 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Amazing isn’t it how they are expending all this energy and lies on the VICE presidental candidate?

    Palin put the fear ‘em and I am lovin’ it.

  49. #457036
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:37 am, happyscrapper said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 10:57 am, Red State Skeptic said:
    An outstanding legal mind there. Is she going to debate Barack Obama on strict constructionism?

    Obama is running for President against John McCain, not Gov. Palin. She won’t be debating Obama on anything. You and Obama seem to have forgotten just who he is running against. All this negative hoopla over a Vice Presidential candidate is unseemly.

  50. #457038
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:38 am, sonofdy said:

    A tanning bed controversy!? That she paid for!?

    I know. How terriable that she should use her own money to buy something :roll:

  51. #457040
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:41 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    http://www.akip.org/platform.html
    Try actualy reading it.

    Ha! Trinity’s website is pretty innocuous too, but we all know who’s behind it and what it really stands for!

  52. #457042
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:41 am, ajmontana said:

    T.D.S.
    Troll Derangement Syndrome

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′
    Image: trolls in Panic mode…. lmao
    They fear her….

  53. #457044
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:42 am, happyscrapper said:

    In response to my comment:The only people who think George Bush is satan are the lefties. Continuing some of his policies is a GOOD thing. Cutting taxes is something George Bush did and continuing that is necessary.

    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:01 am,

    Red State Skeptic said:
    I guess “lefties” make up 70%+ of our country.

    Did you miss it when I said the word, “satan”? Most of the country disagrees with some of Bush’s decisions. But most of the country does not think he is “satan”. Only the liberals are that hateful.

  54. #457047
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:43 am, Laree said:

    Eugenics is an ugly thing, and they can call it pro choice all they want. But in the words of Barack Obama “you can put lipstick on a pig, but it is still a pig”

    http://sarah-palin-2008.blogspot.com/2008/09/trigs-breakthough.html

  55. #457048
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:43 am, nyk said:

    can’t say that I’ve ever known an outspokenly liberal woman with a tan. Then again, outspokenly liberal women tend to shy away from soap, shampoo, wax, razors, and scissors as well.

    Oh, yeah — that Scarlett Johannson is such a dog! That Gwyneth Paltrow is just gross. Halle Berry — yuck! Jessica Alba…bleaaaach!!! Rosario Dawson, Anne Hathaway, Kerry Washington, Jennifer Garner, Christie Brinkley, Daryl Hannah…
    Be serious. Although I think this “Conservative Women Are Hotter Than Liberal Women” ridiculousness that sometimes gets posted here is just silly, the fact that an awful lot of the women who are recognized as among the most beautiful in the world are actresses (who, btw, are overwhelmingly liberal) means this is an argument you really don’t want to have.

  56. #457054
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:44 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On September

    16th, 2008 at 11:29 am, nyk said:
    If not now…when? This is first REAL chance to elect a female to the highest office in the land, and the feminists hypocrites are trying to destroy it.
    Why would I possibly vote for a woman who opposes everything I believe in? Feminism doesn’t mean dumbly giving your vote to anyone with ovaries. That’s completely missing the point.

    Interesting read.

  57. #457058
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:46 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    All this negative hoopla over a Vice Presidential candidate is unseemly.

    I agree. I don’t think it helps Obama to even acknowledge the Governor. Personally I am terrified that this woman who is so close to being President (since you-know-who isn’t getting any younger) is as dangerously unqualified as any I have ever seen.

    Just my opinion, you have yours. It’s been fun, but I have other things to do (you wouldn’t know it :) ) Have a great day, everyone.

  58. #457059
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:47 am, ajmontana said:

    ROFLMAO @ all the trolls lame azs parrot KOS talking points that are getting them NOWHERE!!!

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′
    Image: trolls wallowing in their own pig poop nov. 5th. 8)

  59. #457061
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:47 am, nyk said:

    Interesting read.

    If only because he’s vastly outnumbered by the number of (actual) women who’ve written about what an affront her nomination is.

  60. #457072
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:51 am, nyk said:

    If only because he’s vastly outnumbered by the number of (actual) women who’ve written about what an affront her nomination is.

    Sorry, 30. Referencing a different article and mixed up the two because of the author’s name. Reading the one you cite now…

  61. #457074
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:51 am, sonofdy said:

    is as dangerously unqualified as any I have ever seen.

    Yet she is far more qualified than your PRESIDENTAL nominee. Sad.

  62. #457080
    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:53 am, sonofdy said:

    Ha! Trinity’s website is pretty innocuous too, but we all know who’s behind it and what it really stands for!

    Let me guess, you didn’t go to trinity’s web site either :roll:

    RSS <- pointless to talk to.

  63. #457092
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:00 pm, b-cat said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:29 am, nyk said:
    Why would I possibly vote for a woman who opposes everything I believe in? Feminism doesn’t mean dumbly giving your vote to anyone with ovaries.

    The average Obama voter is voting on the basis of race.

    Dumbly? What the…?

  64. #457094
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:01 pm, Patronedheart said:

    Question:
    How many presidents never attended college?
    Answer
    There have actually been nine –
    George Washington
    Andrew Jackson
    Martin Van Buren
    Zachary Taylor
    Millard Fillmore
    Abraham Lincoln
    Andrew Johnson
    Grover Cleveland
    Harry S Truman
    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Which_7_presidents_did_not_graduate_college
    While Palin did actually graduate from college, the fact that she received credits from other colleges is trivial. It took me 3 colleges to receive my Computer Science degree because I was in the Air Force during college, and ended up moving around a lot. Once again, your liberal argument doesn’t hold water, so maybe you’re the one that should stop carrying it around.

  65. #457098
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:04 pm, Helene said:

    About three months ago US Weekly started showing up in my mail. I toss it out.

    Now, I simply take the postcards (2 per magazine) asking me to purchase the subscription, write a note on the back about how I support Sarah Palin and drop them in the mail. I send in two postcards a week. Last week I went to the grocery store, picked up 5 magazines, shook them and mailed in 10 postcards.

    This is my simple protest. Easy to do. Each postcard costs .42$ to mail, then it has to be processed.

    Just my simple protest.

    No muss, no fuss.

  66. #457099
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:06 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:43 am, nyk said:
    Oh, yeah — that Scarlett Johannson is such a dog! That Gwyneth Paltrow is just gross. Halle Berry — yuck! Jessica Alba…bleaaaach!!! Rosario Dawson, Anne Hathaway, Kerry Washington, Jennifer Garner, Christie Brinkley, Daryl Hannah…
    Be serious. Although I think this “Conservative Women Are Hotter Than Liberal Women” ridiculousness that sometimes gets posted here is just silly, the fact that an awful lot of the women who are recognized as among the most beautiful in the world are actresses (who, btw, are overwhelmingly liberal) means this is an argument you really don’t want to have.

    Looks like “Redstate” has left the building and NYK has taken over.
    Regarding those genuine beauties known as Hollywood actresses…like Pamela Anderson who has told Sarah Palin to “suck it”…those actresses who use botox, liposuction, breast augmentation, gobs of make-up so they can appear more glamourous on the screen..oh and endless touchups on any magazine they appear in…is that the beauty you are referring to? Have you seen any of them without make-up? Yuck. And few of them possess the inner beauty that results from being a really nice, genuine, moral person.

  67. #457103
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:09 pm, lgm said:

    walterc said:

    Let’s see, my choice is:

    A) vote for a War hero and a VP from Alaska that bought a tanning bed with her own money, or

    B) vote for an arugula chomping elitist

    You need to learn more about elites. Cigars are chomped, arugula is chewed gracefully.

    that (who, actually, but grammar is not the strong point of blogs) hangs out with terrorists

    Have you seen the picture of Rumsfeld shaking the hand of Saddam Hussein? That’s hanging out with terrorists … and sending them weapons.

    and his pork barrel hair plug pal

    I don’t know who this is about (whom??), but Palin is way more porked up than Obama.

    that’s been endorsed by every despot regime on the planet.

    The Chinese like Bush/McCain

  68. #457104
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:09 pm, akoypinoy said:

    Can’t blame the Obamamites for smearing Gov. Palin. It’s an old strategy – to misdirect your opponent and hide your weakness in defense, adopt the offensive mode, using everything at your disposal, including lies and innuendoes. Unfortunately, it’s not working for them, they’re hanging themselves with this gambit and I say, give the lefties all the rope to hang themselves with.

  69. #457106
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:10 pm, greenfairie said:

    Back on topic…

    My mom out of the blue was sent two issues of Us Magazine, including the Sarah Is Satan issue, for some “four issues free” offer. The offer in itself is a ripoff; they keep sending you the mags and bill you for them unless you proactively cancel the magazine. I helped my mom send an e-mail back saying, “Thanks but no thanks.” They are indeed getting desperate.

  70. #457107
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:11 pm, ajmontana said:

    LGM give up, you lose!

    lmao…..

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′

  71. #457109
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:11 pm, nyk said:

    The average Obama voter is voting on the basis of race.

    I don’t think that’s true but for the sake of argument…that very point is one I’ve seen used here over and over (ad nauseum) as a means of refuting the validity of Obama supporters’ votes. So why the sudden support of identity politics in the case of Palin?

    Dumbly? What the…?

    Yes. That would be the adverbial form of dumb. For more, see Webster’s Dictionary, here:
    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dumbly
    or Answers.com, here:
    http://www.answers.com/topic/dumbly
    or Wiktionary, here:
    http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dumbly

  72. #457110
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:12 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:04 pm, Helene said:

    I got a good chuckle out of that. Thanks.

  73. #457114
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:12 pm, DBNinKY said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 11:29 am, nyk said:

    Why would I possibly vote for a woman who opposes everything I believe in? Feminism doesn’t mean dumbly giving your vote to anyone with ovaries. That’s completely missing the point.

    If feminism is to help ALL women, then how can feminists ignore the first chance to help elect our first woman Vice President and eventual President?

    Feminists should leap for joy that at last one of their own sex is not JUST cracking the glass ceiling, but will send it crashing to the floor and will kick it to the curb come November 4th!

    Isn’t that the aim of sexual equality, to have the sexes participating equally in high positions? Shouldn’t feminism’s first goal be to elect a woman to the office of VP-President, regardless of her political leanings, so as to ease Americans into the idea of a female President? Then, after the U.S. has accepted the concept of women in the presidency, move back to supporting females who tow their line (pro-abortion liberals) for president?

  74. #457119
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:16 pm, RetFireman said:

    They just do not get it. She purchases something USED (You know…that whole recycling thing) and installs it herself, FAR CHEAPER than the $35,000 that they are claiming it costs to purchase and install a NEW one, and THIS is their big “Gotcha”? THIS is what they think disqualifies her from becoming the Vice President of the United States?

    I would say maybe we could list a few things that The Golden Calf and Pluggie the WOnderboy have purchased and installed into their homes, but neither they nor the media have bothered to go that deep into the sewer and sold their souls in order the get such worthless, useless, BULLS**T.

    If there is anyone that is still receiving this publication at this point, I sure would like to know what their justification is.

    And anyone who does not send Amazon, or anywhere else that tries to send them this toilet paper, a refusal letter or to send these issues back with “Return to Sender…Unwanted Garbage” written in huge letters with Magic Marker all over the cover, I would sure like to know why and what their rationalization of obtaining and reading something so outrageously worthless is?

  75. #457122
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:18 pm, nyk said:

    Have you seen any of them without make-up? Yuck.

    Yup. And they’re still a far cry from Ann Coulter or Laura Ingraham, the two women on whom this absurd idea seems to rest. My point is, if you’re going to go on absurd rants about how liberal women are unattractive and conservative women are great beauties (in itself a dumb, baseless and pointless argument to begin with) then you should probably consider that the women our society has deemed “most beautiful” are overwhelmingly liberal.

    And few of them possess the inner beauty that results from being a really nice, genuine, moral person

    I didn’t realize you had so many close, personal relationships with Hollywood A-Listers to be able to make this claim with such authority.

  76. #457127
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:19 pm, happyscrapper said:

    This thread seems to have been taken over by trolls. I don’t have time for this! I mean, we discuss the issues with them in a clear logical way and they still don’t get it. So why waste our time? Liberals are the most pig-headed people on the planet. You could try putting lipstick on them but they are still pigs. Bye.

  77. #457132
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:20 pm, nyk said:

    Shouldn’t feminism’s first goal be to elect a woman to the office of VP-President, regardless of her political leanings, so as to ease Americans into the idea of a female President?

    Actually…um, no, it isn’t. This is a complete and total warping of feminist ideology. What’s more, I thought you guys were against identity politics.

  78. #457143
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:26 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    This is a complete and total warping of feminist ideology.

    Feminism exists so ugly women can get jobs.

  79. #457159
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:33 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:18 pm, nyk said: I didn’t realize you had so many close, personal relationships with Hollywood A-Listers to be able to make this claim with such authority.

    O.K. One more comment before I leave this thread for more productive activities. You have a point there…I don’t have any close personal relationships with Hollywood A-listers, nor would I ever want to. However, I do watch the news and read the papers. I see the drug abuse, divorce rate, suicides, drunk driving arrests, spouse stealing, etc. that goes on in Hollywood as a matter of course. It is obvious that the moral standards out there is not the same as regular, normal Americans. Sorry, it is just a fact. And don’t tell me that normal Americans also do those things. Yes,some do, but a majority of Hollywood actors have those kinds of morals as their normal lifestyle. Now, I really must go. Have fun.

  80. #457161
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:33 pm, John Ansell said:

    The Governors Mansion in Illinois has a heated driveway. Gov. Hairspray does not even live there and his travel to/from Chicago are on the taxpayers. Which is worse? Oh, I forgot to mention, Rezko went to jail because of Gov. Bag-O-Chips.

  81. #457172
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:40 pm, iamsaved said:

    Liberals can only complain – they don’t make things better.

    A good example is to check the major liberal strong hold cities and see when the last time they had a Republican Mayor. Also check out the problems they are enmeshed in and it keeps getting worse – welfare; crime; bankrupcy, fraud, waste, and the list goes on.

    If liberalism were the answer, these cities wouldn’t be rated as the worst.

    Here’s a hint – check out Detroit.

  82. #457184
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:44 pm, RogerCfromSD said:

    “My point is, if you’re going to go on absurd rants about how liberal women are unattractive and conservative women are great beauties (in itself a dumb, baseless and pointless argument to begin with) then you should probably consider that the women our society has deemed “most beautiful” are overwhelmingly liberal.”

    Nonsense. What evidence do you have to support such a statement?

  83. #457185
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:45 pm, rightisright said:

    1 of you libs out there, tell me what, if Gov. Palin is such a flack, self absorbed, arrogant, bible packing, gun clinging, over spending of the peoples taxes, redneck, backward, hayseed, are you so afraid of?

    Gov. Palin has ‘em runnin’ scared and I love every step of their down fall.

  84. #457188
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:47 pm, Milwaukee Mike said:

    I’ll bet she doesn’t even pay carbon offsets for the extra energy that bed uses!

  85. #457189
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:48 pm, DBNinKY said:
    Shouldn’t feminism’s first goal be to elect a woman to the office of VP-President, regardless of her political leanings, so as to ease Americans into the idea of a female President?

    Actually…um, no, it isn’t. This is a complete and total warping of feminist ideology. What’s more, I thought you guys were against identity politics.

    Walk before you run, Feminists, or else you run the risk of forever staying in place. No one gets everything all at once.

  86. #457192
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:49 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    Check out the insanity of Iamsaved:

    Liberals can only complain – they don’t make things better.

    A good example is to check the major liberal strong hold cities and see when the last time they had a Republican Mayor. Also check out the problems they are enmeshed in and it keeps getting worse – welfare; crime; bankrupcy, fraud, waste, and the list goes on.

    Jeez lady – what are you saved from?

    The greatest cities in America are liberal, that’s because they are wealthy, diverse, international and well educated.

    What I don’t understand is why you guys are so hostile towards: wealthy, diverse, international, well educated types – all of these people are your brothers and sisters.

  87. #457197
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:53 pm, RogerCfromSD said:

    Red State Skeptic said, “Personally I am terrified that this woman who is so close to being President (since you-know-who isn’t getting any younger) is as dangerously unqualified as any I have ever seen.”

    Funny how a patriotic, accomplished woman terrifies the crap out of liberals, but homegrown terrorists and criminal associations don’t faze them at all.

  88. #457201
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:55 pm, nyk said:

    Walk before you run, Feminists, or else you run the risk of forever staying in place. No one gets everything all at once.

    With Palin, we risk losing what we already have.

    What I don’t understand is why you guys are so hostile towards: wealthy, diverse, international, well educated types

    Mmmmm…I disagree on the wealthy part. But as for the rest of your list, I too find the hostility baffling.

  89. #457203
    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:57 pm, Jim M. said:

    On September 16th, 2008 at 12:49 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    Let me guess – the country you love is France?

  90. #457204
    On September 16th, 2008 at 1:00 pm, RogerCfromSD said:

    Ilovemycountry said, “Jeez lady – what are you saved from?

    The greatest cities in America are liberal, that’s because they are wealthy, diverse, international and well educated.”

    San Diego’s not liberal. Our financial problems here were started by and enabled by liberal council members and unions. Aside from these clowns, we’re a decidedly Conservative city. There are many others. All as wealthy, diverse, international, and well educated as any other place.

    “What I don’t understand is why you guys are so hostile towards: wealthy, diverse, international, well educated types – all of these people are your brothers and sisters.”

    Class warfare and penis envy are part and parcel of the liberal mentality. “Tax the rich!” This mantra is yours, not ours. Own it.

  91. #457205
    On September 16th, 2008 at 1:00 pm, Jim M. said:

    Where was all of this left wing whining about a VP’s experience when Silky was on the Dumocratic ticket with Kerry?

    He did have better hair than Palin, though; I’ll give him that.

  92. #457218
    On September 16th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, Common Sense said:

    Speaking of sexist commentary on Palin’s appearance, our local paper, the Rocky Mountain News, had several articles about the candidate’s appearances here yesterday. The article on Palin described what she was wearing but the article on Obama didn’t. Since both articles were accompanied by pictures, what the heck does her clothing have to do with anything?

  93. #457219
    On September 16th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Tanning bed? You mean because Alaska can be really dark during the winter? Off to work in the dark, home from work in the dark, and no vitamin D in between? Yeah, this is a real scandal, and paid for with her own money.

    Isn’t US down to Me at this point – Wenner and no subscribers?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The indelible whiteness of MSNBC

November 23, 2009 05:07 AM by Michelle Malkin

106 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Palin-bashers of pallor.

Who’s afraid of conservative American women?

November 16, 2009 11:17 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“Extreme” in a skirt.

Sarah Palin: “Going Rogue”

September 28, 2009 05:52 PM by Michelle Malkin

96 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

Letterman’s half-assed apology; Update: Palin accepts

June 15, 2009 11:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

149 Comments | 25 Trackbacks

Bad joke.

David Letterman: Perv

June 12, 2009 04:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

766 Comments | 61 Trackbacks

Why they hate us

June 11, 2009 11:42 AM by Michelle Malkin

195 Comments | 25 Trackbacks


Categories: Sarah Palin



TigerHawk

» Negative equity
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook