About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Gawker lies again

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 17, 2008 06:56 PM

The predictable response from the Gawker smear machine to my criticism of their decision to publish illegally obtained photos of the Palin children?

Slime, false moral equivalence, and more lies.

Here’s the summary, so I don’t have to link and you don’t have to give them traffic:

*They repost the fake bikini photoshop that gives them so much sick pleasure.

*They get their nutroots talking points wrong about the infamous UC Santa Cruz incident. The “college kids” were anti-war militants who publicized their own contact information on a public website and in a public press release in order to tout their efforts to sabotage military recruitment efforts on campus. Those militants never contacted me, never complained, and never asked me to take their public information off my site.

(But never mind. In their warped heads, there’s no difference at all between republishing public information made public by those individuals and publishing private photos of children obtained through the federal crime of illegal e-mail hacking. While we’re on the subject of nutroots talking points, it looks like they forgot to dredge up my “stalking” of the Graeme Frost family and CNN/YouTube debate plants.)

*And to top it all off, they make libelous claims about my second book.

In short: Gawker Media is proud to have violated the Palin children’s privacy and will happily smear those who dare challenge them.

***

From the Gawker advertising page:

Posted in: Gawker, Sarah Palin

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Michelle Malkin » Sarah Palin’s private e-mail hacked, family photos raided; cesspool blog gloats; feds investigate
  2. Sarah Palin Attacked and Hacked Emails: « Riggword Weblog
  3. کمانگیر » عکس روز: با هم ایمیل خانم معاون رییس جمهور را می خوانیم
  4. “Where are the privacy absolutists now?”
  5. Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection (60 Cases) « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  6. Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator
  7. In plain English - how they hacked Sarah Palin's Yahoo account | blogs4God
  8. Sorry, that's not good enough | Dabubbler.com
  9. Tel-Chai Nation
  10. PALIN’S PRIVATE E-MAIL HACKED « Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger
  11. Michelle Malkin » Closing in on the Palin e-mail hacker
  12. Tennessee Democrat family connected to theft of Palin’s private e-mail? « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
  13. Michelle Malkin » On the Palin e-mail hacker trail
  14. Hawaii Ending Universal Child Health Care After 7 Months Because Mamilies Were Dropping Private Coverage So Their Children Would Be Eligible For The Subsidized Plan | Right Voices
  15. Hawaii Ending Universal Child Health Care After 7 Months Because Families Were Dropping Private Coverage So Their Children Would Be Eligible For The Subsidized Plan « Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:00 pm, MtsEdge said:

    These people need to be prosecuted.

  2. #2
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:01 pm, ErinF said:

    These jerks make me sick to my stomach.

  3. #3
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:01 pm, tarpon said:

    They need an enema.

  4. #4
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:06 pm, The Master said:

    Is the irony pretty ironic? Obama slams McCain for not using email and Palin’s gets hacked when she does.

  5. #5
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:06 pm, guitarplayer said:

    Just a bunch of slimeballs.

  6. #6
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:06 pm, Graham Dawson (archonix) said:

    Absolut again? Dammit..

  7. #7
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:07 pm, guitarplayer said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:06 pm, Graham Dawson (archonix) said:

    Absolut again? Dammit..

    I switched to Skyy. :-)

  8. #8
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:08 pm, beenthere said:

    This is a preview of what is to come, no matter who wins in November. Obama either will not or cannot control them. Therefore, he is no longer a factor no matter what he says or does. These monsters who act in his name are a force that is huge, out-of-control, unaccountable. We have to fight back.

  9. #9
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:08 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    Unleash the Jawas.

  10. #10
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:11 pm, Southpaw said:

    The liberals are on the run and they’re desperate. Heck, I heard even Code Pink slinked out of town in Berkeley, S.F. mayor Newsom is being slammed by his own constituents over sanctuary for illegal drug dealers, Franken is on the defensive in Minnesota,….

  11. #11
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:11 pm, sausage said:

    The “college kids” were anti-war militants

    So you’re using the same term to describe college kids as the media uses for Islamic terrorists who, you know, actually kill people? Interesting….

  12. #12
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:13 pm, DBNinKY said:

    I know the Palin family will probably decline to prosecute Gawker, conservative politicians seldom file charges when their rights have been violated, but it seems some civic minded group could file suit against G-Media in the public’s interest.

  13. #13
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:14 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    I’m glad Lotus isn’t on that list.

  14. #14
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:16 pm, SixDegrees said:

    These people need to be prosecuted.

    That will certainly happen, though it may take a while.

    What they really need is to be infiltrated. You can never get rid of underground groups like this one. The best approach is to simply tunnel into their organization from top to bottom. That’s why the KKK isn’t a problem anymore; they’re still around, but they can’t plot anything important without it being instantly known by the authorities. You also give such pukes an opportunity to blow off steam in somebody’s back 40, instead of on Mainstreet.

    I’m sure there are many readers here with the skills and wherewithal to pull this off. I’d strongly suggest talking things over with the authorities first, so you don’t get caught up in someone else’s net.

  15. #15
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:18 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    Well I hope the DoJ brings these cretins down. The site looks like a trash-pit btw. I think wikileaks should take some responsibility too for this debacle too.

  16. #16
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:21 pm, Brian72 said:

    The Secret Service has to get these people. Let them cry fascist all they want, but they are breaking federal laws here, right?

    I remember that stupid bikini shot episode. They bring it right back out like it wasn’t debunked that day. What a collection of slimy sh!tbags. I hate these people, I really do.

    Michelle will not be intimidated. You will not scare her away with such stupid hackery. F off, jerks.

    We here are behind Michelle and Sarah %110.

    That is all. :evil:

  17. #17
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:23 pm, Regulus said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:11 pm, sausage said:

    So you’re using the same term to describe college kids as the media uses for Islamic terrorists who, you know, actually kill people? Interesting….

    You’ve heard of “militant” feminists, haven’t you? I have. How about “militant atheists” or “militant agnostics?”

    In colloquial usage, the term is effectively synonymous with “strident” “obnoxious” or “combative.” A discerning reader always takes the sentence as a whole to figure out what the context is. If Michelle meant to say “murderous” in describing the “college kids” who assaulted the Army recruiters at UCSC, I’m sure that word is in her vocabulary. That she didn’t should speak volumes to a native speaker of English.

  18. #18
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:23 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Is the irony pretty ironic? Obama slams McCain for not using email and Palin’s gets hacked when she does.

    No irony. They found out McCain doesn’t do email - when they were planning an attack on him. And kept quiet about Palin while they worked on hacking her.

    This is conjecture on my part, but I wasn’t born yesterday.

  19. #19
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:23 pm, johnsteele said:

    There will be no prosecutions. By the time charges can be brought Obama will be in the WH and will squash any attempt to punish these slimeballs.

  20. #20
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:23 pm, SixDegrees said:

    The liberals are on the run and they’re desperate.

    I’d like to believe that. But a neck-and-neck race is hardly what I’d call “on the run” or “desperate.”

    Moving forward, it’s important to do more than simply whine and moan about this latest incident. This is a serious Federal crime - several crimes, actually - involving several people with a political agenda, and one thing that needs to happen is to tie this incident firmly to the Democrats, with the assertion that this is the sort of thing we have to look forward to if these bastards get elected. It puts their delusional whining over the Patriot Act to shame. Can you imagine what Obama and his followers will do with command of Homeland Security and all of it’s subsidiary agencies at their disposal, run by people like Ayers and Wright? Or worse?

    The take-away message here is that the Democrats are flat-out criminals.

    But I would in no way suggest that they are faltering. Far from it. There’s a long, hard, uphill battle between now and November.

  21. #21
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:24 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    sausage seller said:

    So you’re using the same term to describe college kids as the media uses for Islamic terrorists who, you know, actually kill people? Interesting….

    Dude, when college kids is spelled “college kids” (with quotes) it means they’re not college kids but college kids pretending to be college kids.

    I hope you gave up the habit of shop lifting meat by shoving down your pants btw; you should get counseling for that.

  22. #22
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:25 pm, [IMH] said:

    Truth doesn’t matter to them, nor facts, nor any sense of decency — only their feelings.

    Welcome to Drama Queen Nation.

  23. #23
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:26 pm, SixDegrees said:

    I think wikileaks should take some responsibility too for this debacle too.

    Publishing stolen emails is a Federal Offense. wikileaks is looking at harsh penalties if charged. If you want the information on those web pages, you better grab screen shots now, before they’re taken down.

  24. #24
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:31 pm, purplepeep said:

    Ah, well, I suspect when CEOs of the sleazy Gawker empire are “interviewed” by the DOJ and Secret Service about it’s part in the Emailgate break-in, their lawyers might also give them some advice on how not to do bad PR.

    Though “bad PR” will likely be the least of their legal worries for being part of Obama’s illegal dirty tricks team.

    “What does the Obama campaign know about the Emailgate break-in and when did they know it?”

  25. #25
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:32 pm, twiggman said:

    So you’re using the same term to describe college kids as the media uses for Islamic terrorists who, you know, actually kill people? Interesting….

    So Sausage…. Your actually saying Islamic terrorists, you know KILL PEOPLE…..Interesting…..

  26. #26
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:37 pm, RogerCfromSD said:

    Oh, snausage, you’re so uncleverly obtuse.

  27. #27
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:41 pm, corkie said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:11 pm, sausage said:

    So you’re using the same term to describe college kids as the media uses for Islamic terrorists who, you know, actually kill people? Interesting….

    PULEEZE. Lame.

    The media uses the term soldier to describe people “who, you know, actually kill people.” Are you implying that the term ’soldier’ is somehow restricted also?????

  28. #28
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:43 pm, purplepeep said:

    sausage said:
    So you’re using the same term to describe college kids as the media uses for Islamic terrorists who, you know, actually kill people?

    Actually before the Muslim terrorists attacked US soil, such terrorism had long been the had long been the province of leftist college “kids”, laddie. Before your time - so ask William Ayers or his close associate, Barry Obama.

    Interestingly enough, the liberal US mainstream media always identified the terrorists who held Americans hostage in Iran in 1979 as “students”. Amadinajab then was, and still is, an A+ “student”.

    The exit question:
    “What does the Obama campaign know about the Emailgate break-in and when did they know it?”

  29. #29
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:56 pm, FilmLadd said:

    Of course Volkswagen, brainchild of Adolf, the penultimate socialist, advertises on the Gawker website.

  30. #30
    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:56 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    “What does the Obama campaign know about the Emailgate break-in and when did they know it?”

    They knew McCain didn’t use email…

  31. #31
    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:03 pm, Rock the Nation said:

    Sausage, you read the article about the left-freaks sleazy smear job, and all you can say is some pathetic Alan Colmes-type wining about using the word militant?
    “Interesting…”

  32. #32
    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:15 pm, Bruce said:

    This is interesting …
    Just ran a WhoIs on gawker.com.

    No hit.

    hmmmm….???

  33. #33
    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:31 pm, nyc123me said:

    The trash needs to be taken out.

  34. #34
    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:37 pm, escondidoguy said:

    There will be no prosecutions. By the time charges can be brought Obama will be in the WH and will squash any attempt to punish these slimeballs.

    They will be punished and BO will only get to the White House if he takes the tour.

  35. #35
    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:38 pm, Bruce said:

    hah - got it this time, by IP address - the domain name is masked:)

    OrgName: Datagram, Inc.
    OrgID: DATAGR-1
    Address: 33 Whitehall Street
    City: New York
    StateProv: NY
    PostalCode: 10004
    Country: US

    ReferralServer: rwhois://rwhois.dgram.net:4321/

    NetRange: 69.60.0.0 - 69.60.31.255
    CIDR: 69.60.0.0/19
    NetName: DATAGRAM
    NetHandle: NET-69-60-0-0-1
    Parent: NET-69-0-0-0-0
    NetType: Direct Allocation
    NameServer: VANDAM.DATAGRAM.COM
    NameServer: VARICK.DATAGRAM.COM
    Comment:
    RegDate: 2006-08-04
    Updated: 2008-01-28
    OrgTechHandle: JKI56-ARIN
    OrgTechName: Kim, Jae
    OrgTechPhone: +1-212-727-9500
    OrgTechEmail: jae@datagram.com

    # ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2008-09-16 19:10
    # Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN’s WHOIS database.

  36. #36
    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:43 pm, ClearlyNow said:

    Obamessiah now looks and acts like the proverbial deer in the headlights, unable to comprehend the coming disaster, no longer able to pretend that he can control his “supporters.”

  37. #37
    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:44 pm, DirkBelig said:

    Liberals do not consider non-liberals to be worthy of any of the rights they demand for themselves - speech, privacy, etc. - and they hypocritically shriek as if Dubya is sitting in the Oval Office listening in to their phone calls, then turn around and pull Michael Steele credit files and publish Palin’s e-mails. Since non-liberals are sub-life forms to them, lower than bacteria and worthy of extermination, they feel no guilt or compunction to restrain themselves.

    In other words, when Fuerher Obama ascends to the throne of power, they will be his Brownshirts and make sure that we’re rounded up to be…dealt with.

    With the Treason Media firmly on Obama’s side, any prosecutions will be condemned as fascist attempts to stifle free speech and dissent. When almost the entirety of the Treason Media is capable and willing to tell Big Lies to attain their goals, who’s going to stand against them? Us? HA!!! This is why Obama is running those Spanish ads smearing Rush as anti-Mexican - he know more people will hear the lies than see Jake Tapper’s debunking and thus will carry the poisoned message with them and spread it like a virus, passing lies from person to person until it overwhelms the Truth.

  38. #38
    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:45 pm, Lincoln said:

    We need to find out exactly who their sponsors are and give them an earful. If they have any agreement with an ad network (like Advertising.com) we ought to send them emails too to voice our complaints. Hit them where it hurts. (I said this on Redstate too)

    BTW, wasn’t Gawker also the morons who disrupted a conference by switching off plasma TVs with a remote device?

    Real mature lot they are.

  39. #39
    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:54 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Gawker is a P.O.S. site and organization.

    I would not be surprised if they employ internet criminals like the ones how broke into Sarah Palin’s mail account.

    They are pretty much one step higher in the food chain than Al Jazeera.

    They have no morals, scruples or class. They ARE the dregs of the internet. I doubt anyone with real technical credentials would even consider working there.

  40. #40
    On September 17th, 2008 at 9:31 pm, Erbo said:

    Yes, Gawker needs to be prosecuted.

    “Accessory after the fact,” ladies and gentlemen of the jury.

  41. #41
    On September 17th, 2008 at 9:39 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:06 pm, The Master said:

    Is the irony pretty ironic? Obama slams McCain for not using email and Palin’s gets hacked when she does.

    It is ironic, but to me, the definition of ironic is:

    An avowed socialist radical (Ayers) and an avowed Communist (Klonsky) both support someone whose supporters think of as a Messiah, and is comparable to Jesus.

  42. #42
    On September 17th, 2008 at 9:42 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 8:43 pm, ClearlyNow said:

    Obamessiah now looks and acts like the proverbial deer in the headlights, unable to comprehend the coming disaster, no longer able to pretend that he can control his “supporters.”

    He doesn’t want to.

    These people are deployed for a reason. It’s the same tactic used in the Russian Communist Revolution and in countless others (Asia, South America, etc.) Deploy & denounce. Use the fanatics as a means to make yourself look “reasonable.”

  43. #43
    On September 17th, 2008 at 9:44 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:11 pm, sausage said:

    The “college kids” were anti-war militants

    So you’re using the same term to describe college kids as the media uses for Islamic terrorists who, you know, actually kill people? Interesting….

    Well, weenie, perhaps your argument should be with the azzhats in the drive-by media who refuse to recognize the absolute evil killers they choose to refer to as “militant”.

  44. #44
    On September 17th, 2008 at 9:58 pm, Republicanvet said:

    ———————————————————————–
    MarkMonitor, the Global Leader in Enterprise Brand Protection

    Domain Management
    Online Trademark Protection
    Online Channel Protection
    AntiPhishing Solutions
    ———————————————————————–
    The Data in MarkMonitor.com’s WHOIS database is provided by MarkMonitor.com
    for information purposes, and to assist persons in obtaining information
    about or related to a domain name registration record. MarkMonitor.com
    does not guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a WHOIS query, you agree
    that you will use this Data only for lawful purposes and that, under no
    circumstances will you use this Data to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise
    support the transmission of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or
    solicitations via e-mail (spam); or (2) enable high volume, automated,
    electronic processes that apply to MarkMonitor.com (or its systems).
    MarkMonitor.com reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.
    By submitting this query, you agree to abide by this policy.

    Registrant:
    BLOGWIRE HUNGARY SZELLEMI ALKOTAST HASZNOSITO KFT
    Blogwire
    Magyar u. 36
    Budapest - 1053 - 112233
    HU
    domains@blogwire.com +36.12126559524 Fax: -

    Domain Name: gawker.com

    Registrar Name: Markmonitor.com
    Registrar Whois: whois.markmonitor.com
    Registrar Homepage: http://www.markmonitor.com

    Administrative Contact:
    BLOGWIRE HUNGARY SZELLEMI ALKOTAST HASZNOSITO KFT
    Blogwire
    Magyar u. 36
    Budapest - 1053 - 112233
    HU
    domains@blogwire.com +36.12126559524 Fax: -
    Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
    BLOGWIRE HUNGARY SZELLEMI ALKOTAST HASZNOSITO KFT
    Blogwire
    Magyar u. 36
    Budapest - 1053 - 112233
    HU
    domains@blogwire.com +36.12126559524 Fax: -

    Created on…………..: 2002-10-05.
    Expires on…………..: 2013-10-05.
    Record last updated on..: 2008-03-03.

    Domain servers in listed order:

    ns5.markmonitor.com
    ns7.markmonitor.com
    ns4.markmonitor.com
    ns3.markmonitor.com
    ns1.markmonitor.com
    ns6.markmonitor.com
    ns2.markmonitor.com

    ———————————————————————–
    MarkMonitor, the Global Leader in Enterprise Brand Protection

    Domain Management
    Online Trademark Protection
    Online Channel Protection
    AntiPhishing Solutions

    ———————————————————————–
    MarkMonitor, the Global Leader in Enterprise Brand Protection

    Domain Management
    Online Trademark Protection
    Online Channel Protection
    AntiPhishing Solutions
    ———————————————————————–
    The Data in MarkMonitor.com’s WHOIS database is provided by MarkMonitor.com
    for information purposes, and to assist persons in obtaining information
    about or related to a domain name registration record. MarkMonitor.com
    does not guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a WHOIS query, you agree
    that you will use this Data only for lawful purposes and that, under no
    circumstances will you use this Data to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise
    support the transmission of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or
    solicitations via e-mail (spam); or (2) enable high volume, automated,
    electronic processes that apply to MarkMonitor.com (or its systems).
    MarkMonitor.com reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.
    By submitting this query, you agree to abide by this policy.

    Registrant:
    MarkMonitor Inc.
    MarkMonitor Inc.
    391 N Ancestor Pl
    Boise ID 83704
    US
    ********@markmonitor.com +1.2083895784 Fax: +1.

    Domain Name: markmonitor.com

    Registrar Name: Markmonitor.com
    Registrar Whois: whois.markmonitor.com
    Registrar Homepage: http://www.markmonitor.com

    Administrative Contact:
    MarkMonitor Inc.
    MarkMonitor Inc.
    391 N Ancestor Pl
    Boise ID 83704
    US
    ********@markmonitor.com +1.2083895784 Fax: +1.
    Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
    MarkMonitor Inc.
    MarkMonitor Inc.
    391 N Ancestor Pl
    Boise ID 83704
    US
    ********@markmonitor.com +1.2083895784 Fax: +1.

    Created on…………..: 1999-04-23.
    Expires on…………..: 2015-04-22.
    Record last updated on..: 2007-09-04.

    Domain servers in listed order:

    ns2.markmonitor.com
    ns4.markmonitor.com
    ns1.markmonitor.com
    ns6.markmonitor.com
    ns5.markmonitor.com
    ns7.markmonitor.com
    ns3.markmonitor.com

    ———————————————————————–
    MarkMonitor, the Global Leader in Enterprise Brand Protection

    Domain Management
    Online Trademark Protection
    Online Channel Protection
    AntiPhishing Solutions

  45. #45
    On September 17th, 2008 at 10:18 pm, Craig said:

    Hacker and Gawker need to be put under the jail. Period. End of story.

  46. #46
    On September 17th, 2008 at 10:19 pm, Ty85719 said:

    So…when,exactly, will these people be prosecuted?

  47. #47
    On September 17th, 2008 at 10:22 pm, Republicanvet said:

    Wikileaks.org.

    Huh. Did anyone notice a DSL hookup or satellite on B’HO’s brothers hut in Kenya?

    Domain ID:D130035267-LROR
    Domain Name:WIKILEAKS.ORG
    Created On:04-Oct-2006 05:54:19 UTC
    Last Updated On:01-Mar-2008 01:15:18 UTC
    Expiration Date:04-Oct-2008 05:54:19 UTC
    Sponsoring Registrar:Dynadot, LLC (R1266-LROR)
    Status:OK
    Registrant ID:C-13000
    Registrant Name:John Shipton
    Registrant Street1:c/o WLK PO Box 8098-00200
    Registrant Street2:
    Registrant Street3:
    Registrant City:Nairobi
    Registrant State/Province:
    Registrant Postal Code:none
    Registrant Country:KE
    Registrant Phone:+1.2026576222
    Registrant Phone Ext.:
    Registrant FAX:
    Registrant FAX Ext.:
    Registrant Email:an1984@hush.com
    Admin ID:C-13000
    Admin Name:John Shipton
    Admin Street1:c/o WLK PO Box 8098-00200
    Admin Street2:
    Admin Street3:
    Admin City:Nairobi
    Admin State/Province:
    Admin Postal Code:none
    Admin Country:KE
    Admin Phone:+1.2026576222
    Admin Phone Ext.:
    Admin FAX:
    Admin FAX Ext.:
    Admin Email:an1984@hush.com
    Tech ID:C-13000
    Tech Name:John Shipton
    Tech Street1:c/o WLK PO Box 8098-00200
    Tech Street2:
    Tech Street3:
    Tech City:Nairobi
    Tech State/Province:
    Tech Postal Code:none
    Tech Country:KE
    Tech Phone:+1.2026576222
    Tech Phone Ext.:
    Tech FAX:
    Tech FAX Ext.:
    Tech Email:an1984@hush.com
    Name Server:NS1.EVERYDNS.NET
    Name Server:NS2.EVERYDNS.NET
    Name Server:NS3.EVERYDNS.NET
    Name Server:NS4.EVERYDNS.NET
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:

  48. #48
    On September 17th, 2008 at 10:40 pm, MarcoPolo said:

    Where’s a good DOS attack when ya need one?

  49. #49
    On September 17th, 2008 at 10:56 pm, jangar said:

    Like I always say…they are a godless bunch, those liberals.

    Don’t doubt me.

  50. #50
    On September 17th, 2008 at 10:57 pm, love2rumba said:

    Losing some serious bucks over this should be on the cards for them…

  51. #51
    On September 17th, 2008 at 11:07 pm, geokstr said:

    I just saw that dried up old leftwing self-promoting attorney hag Gloria Allred on Fox, and they were talking about this email hacking. She of course expressed her disdain for this occurence, and that this should be private…BUT…if this felonious attack happens to find just one email, that can be remotely construed as government business in her private mail account, then she could be in big trouble and we should subpoena every one of them.

    If that is true, then just on the offhand chance that Obama may have committed the same offense, every one of his and Michelle’s email accounts should be thrown open as well.

    What despicable, dishonest and vile tactics the left always uses. I guess it was appropriate that when they were first labelling the political philosophies, they gave us the one that was Right.

  52. #52
    On September 17th, 2008 at 11:09 pm, jangar said:

    Ahh, the new American Left…

    The same ones who go ape sh*t over the Patriot act, Bush and evesdropping!

  53. #53
    On September 17th, 2008 at 11:10 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 11:07 pm, geokstr said:

    I just saw that dried up old leftwing self-promoting attorney hag Gloria Allred on Fox, and they were talking about this email hacking. She of course expressed her disdain for this occurence, and that this should be private…BUT…if this felonious attack happens to find just one email, that can be remotely construed as government business in her private mail account, then she could be in big trouble and we should subpoena every one of them.

    So, evidence illegally obtained is OK for this nitwit Allred?

    …yet $90K found in a freezer and evidence of bribery is not enough?

  54. #54
    On September 17th, 2008 at 11:27 pm, bird said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:08 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    Unleash the Jawas.

    Hahaha!

  55. #55
    On September 17th, 2008 at 11:59 pm, Member-VRWC said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:11 pm, sausage said:
    The “college kids” were anti-war militants
    So you’re using the same term to describe college kids as the media uses for Islamic terrorists who, you know, actually kill people? Interesting….

    No, actually not interesting at all.

    You simply made the point that the drive-by media crapweasels are using the wrong term when they describe terrorists as militants.

    Militants may or may not be terrorists; terrorists are never militants.

    Let’s be clear. Members of Al Queda are terrorists, not militants. And the idiots at UCSC are asshats … and militants.

  56. #56
    On September 18th, 2008 at 12:49 am, joetimek said:

    I gotta be honest…I bet that these people become aroused when they get this excited about making up “incriminating” info about conservatives. It’s disgusting to think about, but depraved selfish animals like these are so out of touch with reality. Because, deep down, that’s what you become when you stop thinking and strictly become a creature of emotion- an animal. And animals are a hedonistic bunch that pleasures themselves in any way possible.

  57. #57
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:16 am, mikepatr said:

    I think people should call and email these folks and discuss the matter personally. I bet they would be happy to hear from people interested in their website.

    Maybe, if you like owned a company or something, or just wanted to advertise your handmade gizmos, you could inquire about their advertising rates and set up some meetings at their corporate offices to discuss potential business opportunities that could be a win-win for both parties! Nothing wrong with that!

    Here is their contact information as published on their site.

    Maybe someone could send them a fruitcake or a Whitman’s sampler or something.

    Gawker Media
    210 Elizabeth Street, Fourth Floor
    New York, NY 10012

    (212) 655-9524

    That’s (212) 655-9524

    That phone number again is

    (212) 655-9524

    nick@gawker.com
    alexp@gawker.com
    tips@gawker.com
    ryan@gawker.com
    ADVERTISING@GAWKER.COM

    If you don’t like these guys, one thing to never, ever, ever do is to fraudulently sign them up for things like gay newsletters, high volume mailing lists or right-wing propaganda.It might you sued or something.

  58. #58
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:57 am, zorro said:

    Gawker, typical democraps.

  59. #59
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:58 am, Ordinary Coloradan said:

    Please post the full names, home address and phone, spouse names and children’s names and ages for all of the Gawker execs editors and managers.

    Sauce for the goose… Lets see how they like it when some consequences isimposed on them.

  60. #60
    On September 18th, 2008 at 3:18 am, Joy said:

    Un-freaking-believable…

    We’re headed to civil war…

  61. #61
    On September 18th, 2008 at 3:44 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:06 pm, The Master said:

    Is the irony pretty ironic? Obama slams McCain for not using email and Palin’s gets hacked when she does.

    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:23 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    No irony. They found out McCain doesn’t do email - when they were planning an attack on him. And kept quiet about Palin while they worked on hacking her.

    This is conjecture on my part, but I wasn’t born yesterday.

    I agree. They slammed McCain for not using email because they are mad he didn’t give them a target to attack.

  62. #62
    On September 18th, 2008 at 3:55 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:31 pm, purplepeep said:

    “What does the Obama campaign know about the Emailgate break-in and when did they know it?”

    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:56 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    They knew McCain didn’t use email…

    Exactly. And how did they know McCain doesn’t use email? Becuase he was also a target until they found out they had no target to attack.

  63. #63
    On September 18th, 2008 at 5:33 am, graysonret said:

    So, once again, the Left shows what will happen if they control all 3 branches of the government. Why citizens would vote these people into office, to set up a nanny-state, is amazing. It shows the apathy and dependence that the American people have.

  64. #64
    On September 18th, 2008 at 7:37 am, TxSkirt said:

    I know they pride themselves on being “snarky”, but really it just comes off as juvenile. They remind me of the jr. high boys who wouldn’t dance with the girls and just stood in the corner doing three stooges impressions and telling fart jokes.

  65. #65
    On September 18th, 2008 at 9:10 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    On September 17th, 2008 at 7:31 pm, purplepeep said:

    What does the Obama campaign know about the Emailgate break-in and when did they know it?

    Yes.. Exactly….

    Though I’d like to call it Yahoo-Gate.

    Sounds very familiar doesn’t it? I would lay odds that this hacker, or group of hackers, are tied to the Obama campaign. That’s a lot of effort to put forth for some dude who just goes to leftist protest. Wouldn’t it be interesting if it was linked to some Illinios campaign official?

    There’s more to this than meets the eye.

  66. #66
    On September 18th, 2008 at 9:12 am, Ron Rockstar said:

    Michelle said:

    *And to top it all off, they make libelous claims about my second book.

    “libelous” is worth money Michelle. Stick the knife in and twist it.
    Sue the hell out of them and then give the money to military families. A little salt in that wound would be nice.

  67. #67
    On September 18th, 2008 at 9:38 am, Misscheryl said:

    What is going on in America is the fight against good and evil. Simplistic maybe, but that’s exactly what it is. Who will rule the day?

  68. #68
    On September 18th, 2008 at 9:40 am, lgm said:

    If a hacker found Obama emails you would post them in a heartbeat. Hackers are not politicians — they don’t read newspapers.

    It’s not Obama’s fault Palin can’t figure out how to make a secure password. It’s not Obama’s fault Palin set up an email address gov.palin@gmail.com (or something like that) that indicates she’s doing Governor’s business on a private email account — which is illegal in Alaska.

    Do we really want someone as amateurish as Palin (can’t pick a password, pretends to violate the law) in Washington?

  69. #69
    On September 18th, 2008 at 9:43 am, Misscheryl said:

    lgm said:

    yeah ok, whatever you said.

  70. #70
    On September 18th, 2008 at 9:44 am, MtsEdge said:

    Gloria Allred on Fox, and they were talking about this email hacking. She of course expressed her disdain for this occurence, and that this should be private…BUT…if this felonious attack happens to find just one email, that can be remotely construed as government business in her private mail account, then she could be in big trouble and we should subpoena every one of them.

    I saw the same segment, and I thought, WOW. This self-styled “champion for justice” (remember Scott Peterson and others more recent) has the audacity to gloss over the CRIME in favor of a HYPOTHETICAL non-issue. Only Ted Williams was adamant that these goons should be held accountable, legally and financially.

    Ahh, the new American Left…

    The same ones who go ape sh*t over the Patriot act, Bush and evesdropping!

    The irony is breathtaking. :mad:

  71. #71
    On September 18th, 2008 at 9:47 am, MtsEdge said:

    BUT…if this felonious attack happens to find just one email, that can be remotely construed as government business in her private mail account, then she could be in big trouble and we should subpoena every one of them.

    But if we were talking about a drug dealer, and the drugs were discovered during an illegal search, guess which side of the issue libs would be on.

  72. #72
    On September 18th, 2008 at 9:49 am, Paul Revere said:

    They do realize we have hackers on our side, too, right? **I’m not a hacker nor do I condone hacking** Just sayin!

  73. #73
    On September 18th, 2008 at 10:00 am, fourstringfuror said:

    Do we really want someone as amateurish as Palin Obama(can’t pick a password get anywhere in life without reminding us of his dark skin, pretends to violate follow the law) in Washington?

    No.

  74. #74
    On September 18th, 2008 at 10:05 am, max said:

    Eevry single one of those brands is now dead to me…
    well,… ‘cept HBO. Sorry, but I loves me some Entourage ….

  75. #75
    On September 18th, 2008 at 10:07 am, changer1701 said:

    lgm, if anyone hacked Obama’s email it would instantly be labeled a hate crime and the media would be in a tizzy over it. You and your Lefty friends would have their panties in a bunch and be decrying the gutter politics of the Right.

    But, with this, your concern is if she did state business on her personal account. How convenient. In the other post Michelle has on this, it says the guy who hacked it read through them all. He never mentioned anything about any state business emails, and the ones that have been posted are innocuous. You excuse this vicious invasion of privacy based on seeking “truth” regarding state business, but all you’re really interested in is smearing this woman AND HER FAMILY.

    You, and your ilk, are scum. The gawker folks and anyone else posting that stuff, as well as the people defending it, are nothing but lowlifes that prove over and over how deranged the Left really is. Kindly do us a favor and slither back under the rock you came from, and take your piece of garbage friends with you…

  76. #76
    On September 18th, 2008 at 10:11 am, lgm said:

    changer1701 said (#74):

    if anyone hacked Obama’s email…

    But nobody has, because Obama knows what he’s doing.

  77. #77
    On September 18th, 2008 at 10:17 am, max said:

    Little Girlie Man passive aggressively defends the slimeballs who penetrated Palin’s account…implying that’s it’s fair game to invade someone’s privacy. Hey they didn’t double lock their door! how unsurprising.

    On a different note… How incredible is it that Palin didn’t have anything even remotely incriminating in her emails? Which one of us could stand that kind of scruting? For example, LGM, how many emails do you have with your pathetic playground friends discussing the consistency of your most recent bowel movements? I’m guessing lots.

  78. #78
    On September 18th, 2008 at 10:21 am, Ron Rockstar said:

    On September 18th, 2008 at 10:11 am, lgm said:
    changer1701 said (#74):

    if anyone hacked Obama’s email…

    But nobody has, because Obama knows what he’s doing.

    No, that is not correct. Generally speaking, Republicans respect the law. Democrats do not. I am talking about you lgm. If you respected the law you would just state that it was wrong to hack Palin’s email and be done. I am glad you are not my neighbor.

  79. #79
    On September 18th, 2008 at 10:24 am, Yashmak said:

    If a hacker found Obama emails you would post them in a heartbeat. Hackers are not politicians — they don’t read newspapers.

    - lgm

    Hackers don’t read newspapers? Did you take a poll? Do you even think when you’re at the keyboard?

    There’s a difference between talking about information once it’s out of the bag, and letting it out of the bag in the first place. You cannot draw any sort of equivalence here.

  80. #80
    On September 18th, 2008 at 10:25 am, changer1701 said:

    Oh yeah, Obama knows what he’s doing. Nobody would dare hack into anything of his, lest they be labeled RACIST…hell, you can’t even criticize his policies without him playing the race card over and over again.

    Obama is nothing but an empty-suit Chicago political machine hack, a Marxist who hopes to sail into the White House on the idiocy of his followers and the “white guilt” of others. That’s it. “Hope and Change”…yeah, right.

  81. #81
    On September 18th, 2008 at 10:33 am, DBNinKY said:

    Oh yeah, Obama knows what he’s doing alright - that’s why he has Jim Johnson (corrupt former head of Freddie Mac), Franklin Raines (corrupt former head of Fannie Mae) and Tom Daschle (failed politician) as his advisers.

  82. #82
    On September 18th, 2008 at 10:43 am, happyscrapper said:

    I am growing increasingly weary of the incredible, disgusting, evil tactics of the far left. I just saw on FOX a few minutes ago an article by a so-called journalist in Canada saying the most vile things against Gov. Palin and everyone in her family. Saying anyone who votes for her is white trailer trash and much worse. Apparently her column has been up for a week and is still there. It is on a publicly funded site in Canada. I really am worried about the human race, when these people take off their gloves and show such ugliness I feel I should move into the mountains and withdraw from society. What has happened to us? How have we allowed things to get to this level of degradation? The word “civility” comes from the word “civilization”. It appears that some people no longer even put on a pretense of civility. These people do not belong in the same part of civilization as the rest of us! Sorry for the rant. I am just so depressed by all of this, and that creature’s column was the last straw. Any words of encouragement out there would be greatly appreciated!

  83. #83
    On September 18th, 2008 at 10:43 am, kss1505 said:

    It’s time for a fatwah. I’m glad I drink only Belvedere vodka.

  84. #84
    On September 18th, 2008 at 10:58 am, swmntman said:

    …Do we really want someone as amateurish as Palin…

    C’mon lgm — it’s time to be a real man (or woman) and actually admit that this hacking effort is wrong. Period. You are losing any shred of credibility that you may have had on this site. I tend to be interested in what you say - but quite honestly, I’m disappointed in your arguements lately (you’ve become and adolescent in your worship of Obama).

  85. #85
    On September 18th, 2008 at 11:08 am, cheapseat said:

    and the secret service asked the AP for the names of the hackers and leakers, and of course the democrat propaganda machine aka AP refused. wouldn’t it be lovely to hack into every msm reporters email and leak their private info. forget obama, he will lose on his own account, the reporter class needs a lesson in “good for the gander”.

  86. #86
    On September 18th, 2008 at 11:22 am, Dan Lee said:

    No worries, it’s only a matter of time before Denton & his little cult get what they deserve.

  87. #87
    On September 18th, 2008 at 11:24 am, bentman78 said:

    Man this sucks…I just bought a tight new pair of Puma kicks too. I actually like their stuff and have rugby jersey’s…etc..etc. I also read lifehacker and Gizmodo.

    One another note, I find this is horrible. Liberals have no shame when it boils down to it. The ends justify the means for them and they’ll do what they can to win the election at any cost. I expect this type of behavior from Marxist thugs, not fellow Americans. But I guess The USA’s left are that far of from the likes of Marxist thugs Mugabe currently uses. I read an SFGate article this morning talking about Obama telling his minions to get in our faces. Intimidation, confrontation, invasions of privacy like this and the theft of Steele’s IRS records. You also have Obama trying to shut down a radio station in Chicago he doesn’t like. These people aren’t liberals…they’re evil…

  88. #88
    On September 18th, 2008 at 11:39 am, lgm said:

    Ron Rockstar said (#78):

    Generally speaking, Republicans respect the law. Democrats do not.

    Did you get that little factoid from the Nixon library. Did you torture it out of an FBI crime database (there being a law against torture)? Is that what Monica Goodling told you?

  89. #89
    On September 18th, 2008 at 12:39 pm, happyscrapper said:

    lgm…shut up. You are certifiably crazy.

  90. #90
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, Ron Rockstar said:

    lgm, I said “generally speaking”. Can’t you read? Yes, there are a few Republicans who have a disdain for the law, just like there are one or two democrats who respect the law. You aren’t one of them.

  91. #91
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:09 pm, jeffislouie said:

    Hmm. Maybe this is why the Obama machine is so unhappy that McCain doesn’t use email?

    Gawker is hack journalism and it is my most sincere hope that they are prosecuted for displaying stolen images and emails. True justice would be if anonymous hacked gawker staffer’s emails and posted them on the web, but real justice is coming.

    The DOJ and secret service will find those who hacked the email and prosecute them. Then they’ll go after gawker and daily kos for posting private materials that were illegally obtained.

    The left freaks out about wire tapping and invasion of privacy, then clap loudly when Sarah Palin’s privacy is breached and her email is hacked.

    More liberal hypocrisy. yet another reason many will vote for McCain. In a way, we owe these people. McCain should thank them in his acceptance speech. The left is morally bankrupt.

  92. #92
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:38 pm, jeffislouie said:

    So you’re using the same term to describe college kids as the media uses for Islamic terrorists who, you know, actually kill people? Interesting….

    Yeah, the ‘media’ uses that term to describe terrorists. That’s because the ‘media’ are idiots. They are afraid to call ismlamic terrorists by name and use the easier to digest term ‘militant’.

    So, dipsticks, here’s the definition of ‘militant’:
    an aggressive or fighting person; one who serves as a soldier; aggressive or combative; fighting or warlike; belligerent

    and here is the definition of terrorist:

    Anyone who uses terror as a weapon in a political struggle, frequently in an attempt to coerce a more powerful opponent

    Those college kids were militants. The a-hole radical islamists who kill people in the name of god? They are terrorists.

    It’s called ‘english’ and I recommend you take some time to learn about it.

  93. #93
    On September 19th, 2008 at 4:42 pm, lgm said:

    Ron Rockstar said (#90):

    I said “generally speaking”. (insult omitted) Yes, there are a few Republicans who have a disdain for the law,

    OK. Name the clean ones.

    Bush ?
    Cheney ?
    McCain ?
    Romney ?
    Huckabee (seems clean to me)

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Palin power in Georgia; Democrats counter with…Ludacris

December 1, 2008 02:38 PM by Michelle Malkin

44 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

‘Cuda vs. Luda.

Obama wants his Blackberry back

November 26, 2008 09:49 AM by Michelle Malkin

109 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Keeping in touch with the little people.

Palin wins…

November 17, 2008 10:47 AM by Michelle Malkin

49 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Attention, Howard Kurtz

November 13, 2008 10:27 AM by Michelle Malkin

48 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Fight the smears.

Memo to McCain blabbermouths: Character is destiny

November 7, 2008 07:00 AM by Michelle Malkin

271 Comments | 21 Trackbacks

Send a message to Sarah Palin

November 6, 2008 12:57 PM by Michelle Malkin

145 Comments | 24 Trackbacks

The McCain campaign’s classless cowards; Update: Palin reacts

November 5, 2008 10:29 PM by Michelle Malkin

696 Comments | 102 Trackbacks

In defense of Sarah Palin.

Palin cleared by independent counsel

November 3, 2008 08:58 PM by Michelle Malkin

99 Comments | 15 Trackbacks


Categories: Gawker, Sarah Palin


Weekly Standard

» Why Not Baghdad?