The predictable response from the Gawker smear machine to my criticism of their decision to publish illegally obtained photos of the Palin children?
Slime, false moral equivalence, and more lies.
Here’s the summary, so I don’t have to link and you don’t have to give them traffic:
*They repost the fake bikini photoshop that gives them so much sick pleasure.
*They get their nutroots talking points wrong about the infamous UC Santa Cruz incident. The “college kids” were anti-war militants who publicized their own contact information on a public website and in a public press release in order to tout their efforts to sabotage military recruitment efforts on campus. Those militants never contacted me, never complained, and never asked me to take their public information off my site.
(But never mind. In their warped heads, there’s no difference at all between republishing public information made public by those individuals and publishing private photos of children obtained through the federal crime of illegal e-mail hacking. While we’re on the subject of nutroots talking points, it looks like they forgot to dredge up my “stalking” of the Graeme Frost family and CNN/YouTube debate plants.)
*And to top it all off, they make libelous claims about my second book.
In short: Gawker Media is proud to have violated the Palin children’s privacy and will happily smear those who dare challenge them.
From the Gawker advertising page:
blog comments powered by Disqus
May 8, 2013 08:45 AM by Michelle Malkin
April 17, 2013 09:01 AM by Michelle Malkin
Self-immolation watch: Akin sinks 10 points after Magical Uterus mess; Update: Akin camp: That we’re down by only 10 just proves how weak McCaskill is
August 23, 2012 12:17 PM by Michelle Malkin
February 8, 2013 09:05 AM by Michelle Malkin
October 23, 2012 06:47 PM by Michelle Malkin