<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nancy Pelosi: Ignorant about natural gas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/nancy-pelosi-ignorant-about-natural-gas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/nancy-pelosi-ignorant-about-natural-gas/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:13:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CitizenCaucus.org&#187; national news &#187; Nancy Pelosi: Ignorant about natural gas</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/nancy-pelosi-ignorant-about-natural-gas/comment-page-2/#comment-462230</link>
		<dc:creator>CitizenCaucus.org&#187; national news &#187; Nancy Pelosi: Ignorant about natural gas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14698#comment-462230</guid>
		<description>[...] has no idea about how the other kind is produced. Conn Carroll at Heritage teaches her a lesson: source &gt;&gt;&gt; That&#8217;s because Pelosi is already full of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has no idea about how the other kind is produced. Conn Carroll at Heritage teaches her a lesson: source &gt;&gt;&gt; That&#8217;s because Pelosi is already full of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Svengali, Reid and Pelosi Clueless: &#171; Riggword Weblog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/nancy-pelosi-ignorant-about-natural-gas/comment-page-2/#comment-461423</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Svengali, Reid and Pelosi Clueless: &#171; Riggword Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14698#comment-461423</guid>
		<description>[...] Malkin Again: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malkin Again: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danceswithdachshunds</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/nancy-pelosi-ignorant-about-natural-gas/comment-page-2/#comment-460060</link>
		<dc:creator>Danceswithdachshunds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14698#comment-460060</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;DWD said:    Imagine McCain and Palin challenging Obama and Biden to agree to being hooked up to a lie detector during all the debates? 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yashmak said: I don’t think it’d change anything, what with the softballs they throw Obama.

MC: “Mr. Obama. Do you like children?”
Obama: “Yes.”
MC: “Well, the polygraph proves it. Obama likes children.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I agree that is a valid concern but I have a way around it; here are my rules:

1. A list of, say, 20 true/false questions is written by each candidate to be asked of the opposing candidate. (Sealed in a mayonnaise jar left on Funk and Wagner&#039;s door step, etc.)

2. Each candidate is given one hour in advance to review the questions that they are going to be asked.

3. Either candidate has the option, in advance, to decline to answer any or all of the questions HOWEVER .. the questions that they so decline will be revealed after the completion of the lie detector show down.

4. A coin toss determines which candidate gets to decide who is to ask the first question, (like football), and that candidate asks their question of the other while the other answers it with the lie detector monitoring them. They alternate taking turns from there.

5. Without mentioning the nature of them and just before the questioning begins, the number of questions each candidate has elected to not answer is revealed.  To equalize the number of questions, for whichever candidate has declined the fewer questions, (if any),  that candidate gets to decide that number  of the other&#039;s questions they wish to decline just before the start of questioning. And THOSE questions are NOT revealed. 

What&#039;s left is how to make certain each candidate is truly hooked up to the machine when they are answering. etc. which I suppose is territory for finding a neutral expert party or parties to administer the machinery; certainly not anyone from MSM...
 
Of course the above could all be done without lie detectors too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<blockquote><p>DWD said:    Imagine McCain and Palin challenging Obama and Biden to agree to being hooked up to a lie detector during all the debates?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Yashmak said: I don’t think it’d change anything, what with the softballs they throw Obama.</p>
<p>MC: “Mr. Obama. Do you like children?”<br />
Obama: “Yes.”<br />
MC: “Well, the polygraph proves it. Obama likes children.”</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree that is a valid concern but I have a way around it; here are my rules:</p>
<p>1. A list of, say, 20 true/false questions is written by each candidate to be asked of the opposing candidate. (Sealed in a mayonnaise jar left on Funk and Wagner&#8217;s door step, etc.)</p>
<p>2. Each candidate is given one hour in advance to review the questions that they are going to be asked.</p>
<p>3. Either candidate has the option, in advance, to decline to answer any or all of the questions HOWEVER .. the questions that they so decline will be revealed after the completion of the lie detector show down.</p>
<p>4. A coin toss determines which candidate gets to decide who is to ask the first question, (like football), and that candidate asks their question of the other while the other answers it with the lie detector monitoring them. They alternate taking turns from there.</p>
<p>5. Without mentioning the nature of them and just before the questioning begins, the number of questions each candidate has elected to not answer is revealed.  To equalize the number of questions, for whichever candidate has declined the fewer questions, (if any),  that candidate gets to decide that number  of the other&#8217;s questions they wish to decline just before the start of questioning. And THOSE questions are NOT revealed. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s left is how to make certain each candidate is truly hooked up to the machine when they are answering. etc. which I suppose is territory for finding a neutral expert party or parties to administer the machinery; certainly not anyone from MSM&#8230;</p>
<p>Of course the above could all be done without lie detectors too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yashmak</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/nancy-pelosi-ignorant-about-natural-gas/comment-page-2/#comment-459976</link>
		<dc:creator>Yashmak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14698#comment-459976</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Imagine McCain and Palin challenging Obama and Biden to agree to being hooked up to a lie detector during all the debates? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t think it&#039;d change anything, what with the softballs they throw Obama.

MC: &quot;Mr. Obama.  Do you like children?&quot;
Obama:  &quot;Yes.&quot;
MC: &quot;Well, the polygraph proves it.  Obama likes children.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Imagine McCain and Palin challenging Obama and Biden to agree to being hooked up to a lie detector during all the debates? </p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;d change anything, what with the softballs they throw Obama.</p>
<p>MC: &#8220;Mr. Obama.  Do you like children?&#8221;<br />
Obama:  &#8220;Yes.&#8221;<br />
MC: &#8220;Well, the polygraph proves it.  Obama likes children.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelosi&#8217;s Do Nothing Congress Tries to Put Oil Reserves Off Limits for Good &#124; The Hinge Of Fate</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/nancy-pelosi-ignorant-about-natural-gas/comment-page-2/#comment-459967</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelosi&#8217;s Do Nothing Congress Tries to Put Oil Reserves Off Limits for Good &#124; The Hinge Of Fate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14698#comment-459967</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin points out Pelosi&#8217;s ignorance on natural [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin points out Pelosi&#8217;s ignorance on natural [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danceswithdachshunds</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/nancy-pelosi-ignorant-about-natural-gas/comment-page-2/#comment-459921</link>
		<dc:creator>Danceswithdachshunds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14698#comment-459921</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;#87 Misscheryl said:

It would be a good idea to institute some qualifications to hold congressional office. Once an individual is qualified, then we can vote. I think they should at least be as smarter than a 5th grader. What an embarrassment this woman is…actually, what an embarrassment most of congress is.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not a bad idea; that kind of test and  another kind - a LIE DETECTOR TEST.  Imagine McCain and Palin challenging Obama and Biden to agree to being hooked up to a lie detector during all the debates?  ummmm ahhh errrr .....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>#87 Misscheryl said:</p>
<p>It would be a good idea to institute some qualifications to hold congressional office. Once an individual is qualified, then we can vote. I think they should at least be as smarter than a 5th grader. What an embarrassment this woman is…actually, what an embarrassment most of congress is.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Not a bad idea; that kind of test and  another kind &#8211; a LIE DETECTOR TEST.  Imagine McCain and Palin challenging Obama and Biden to agree to being hooked up to a lie detector during all the debates?  ummmm ahhh errrr &#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITookTheRedPill</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/nancy-pelosi-ignorant-about-natural-gas/comment-page-2/#comment-459843</link>
		<dc:creator>ITookTheRedPill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14698#comment-459843</guid>
		<description>Nancy&#039;s agenda is the same as &lt;a href=&quot;http://itooktheredpill.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/baracks-agenda/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Barack&#039;s agenda&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy&#8217;s agenda is the same as <a href="http://itooktheredpill.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/baracks-agenda/" rel="nofollow">Barack&#8217;s agenda</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iamgman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/nancy-pelosi-ignorant-about-natural-gas/comment-page-2/#comment-459785</link>
		<dc:creator>iamgman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14698#comment-459785</guid>
		<description>My family has owned a farm for over 80 years and we had trucks with natural gas tanks.  We could switch to natural gas with a toggle at any time.  They took up tons of space to use though.  Can someone with more experience say if its feasible for every day cars?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My family has owned a farm for over 80 years and we had trucks with natural gas tanks.  We could switch to natural gas with a toggle at any time.  They took up tons of space to use though.  Can someone with more experience say if its feasible for every day cars?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: regularguy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/nancy-pelosi-ignorant-about-natural-gas/comment-page-2/#comment-459653</link>
		<dc:creator>regularguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14698#comment-459653</guid>
		<description>Dear Plastik,

...and I entirely agree with you.  Your words for her are far too kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Plastik,</p>
<p>&#8230;and I entirely agree with you.  Your words for her are far too kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoffeeGuzzler</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/nancy-pelosi-ignorant-about-natural-gas/comment-page-2/#comment-459652</link>
		<dc:creator>CoffeeGuzzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14698#comment-459652</guid>
		<description>Pelosi IS natural gas. She is nothing but a rotton egg fart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pelosi IS natural gas. She is nothing but a rotton egg fart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plastik</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/nancy-pelosi-ignorant-about-natural-gas/comment-page-2/#comment-459640</link>
		<dc:creator>Plastik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14698#comment-459640</guid>
		<description>Hey Regularguy,

Did I mince my words? I have been watching This end times Harlot riding her tax and spend and BLAME dragon far too long.
She has dis-honored::
our troops
Our war heroes
Our freedom 
Our sensibilities
Our Judaical system
Our contributions to humanity
and our American Civilities.

Nancy Pelosi embodies all that is foul in the Party of the Liberals as Strongly as Sarah Palin has shown what pride can be salvaged in the conservative party.

 Nancy pelosi&#039;s 100 days were as productive as milking a Bull. Where is the CHANGE she promised, where is the end to the war, where is the bi-partisanship. You&#039;d have a better chance searching the skies for E.T. than finding a modicum of fact in the BS she spewed to get elected.

Even her Code Pinko&#039;s turned against her, after she gave them PUBLIC parking spaces to denounce the Military recruiting post, and at present possibly have a small transient anti-Pelosi village built out in front of her San Fran Castle to protest their Liberal Queen.
 I&#039;m surprised Cindy (the commie) sheehan hasn&#039;t bought the house next door and planted Peace tree&#039;s in her American garden of hate to show how she has neither proved a friend of the Liberal or the harbinger of change.

Pelosi is the definition of the same Ole same Ole. Whats that O. Hussein Barrack said about putting lipstick on a PIG? Well I say it&#039;s not the lipstick quote that makes the news. It is the casting (wearing) of the pearls before (by) swine that defines this impotent Politician.

Plastik</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Regularguy,</p>
<p>Did I mince my words? I have been watching This end times Harlot riding her tax and spend and BLAME dragon far too long.<br />
She has dis-honored::<br />
our troops<br />
Our war heroes<br />
Our freedom<br />
Our sensibilities<br />
Our Judaical system<br />
Our contributions to humanity<br />
and our American Civilities.</p>
<p>Nancy Pelosi embodies all that is foul in the Party of the Liberals as Strongly as Sarah Palin has shown what pride can be salvaged in the conservative party.</p>
<p> Nancy pelosi&#8217;s 100 days were as productive as milking a Bull. Where is the CHANGE she promised, where is the end to the war, where is the bi-partisanship. You&#8217;d have a better chance searching the skies for E.T. than finding a modicum of fact in the BS she spewed to get elected.</p>
<p>Even her Code Pinko&#8217;s turned against her, after she gave them PUBLIC parking spaces to denounce the Military recruiting post, and at present possibly have a small transient anti-Pelosi village built out in front of her San Fran Castle to protest their Liberal Queen.<br />
 I&#8217;m surprised Cindy (the commie) sheehan hasn&#8217;t bought the house next door and planted Peace tree&#8217;s in her American garden of hate to show how she has neither proved a friend of the Liberal or the harbinger of change.</p>
<p>Pelosi is the definition of the same Ole same Ole. Whats that O. Hussein Barrack said about putting lipstick on a PIG? Well I say it&#8217;s not the lipstick quote that makes the news. It is the casting (wearing) of the pearls before (by) swine that defines this impotent Politician.</p>
<p>Plastik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: regularguy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/nancy-pelosi-ignorant-about-natural-gas/comment-page-2/#comment-459516</link>
		<dc:creator>regularguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14698#comment-459516</guid>
		<description>Come on, Plastik, don&#039;t hold back...tell us how you really feel!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, Plastik, don&#8217;t hold back&#8230;tell us how you really feel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NJ-Aviator</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/nancy-pelosi-ignorant-about-natural-gas/comment-page-2/#comment-459489</link>
		<dc:creator>NJ-Aviator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14698#comment-459489</guid>
		<description>Nancy Pelosi... Spectacularly stupid.

Also evidenced by who votes her into office.

Rhymes with Ban Dran Disco....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy Pelosi&#8230; Spectacularly stupid.</p>
<p>Also evidenced by who votes her into office.</p>
<p>Rhymes with Ban Dran Disco&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/nancy-pelosi-ignorant-about-natural-gas/comment-page-2/#comment-459319</link>
		<dc:creator>mattm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14698#comment-459319</guid>
		<description>I would call this women a moron, but I don&#039;t want to insult morons.  This is beyond stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would call this women a moron, but I don&#8217;t want to insult morons.  This is beyond stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brooklyn red</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/nancy-pelosi-ignorant-about-natural-gas/comment-page-2/#comment-459268</link>
		<dc:creator>brooklyn red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14698#comment-459268</guid>
		<description>Ron Rockstar re: &lt;em&gt;If she thought she could make a buck out of it she would open a fart factory.&lt;/em&gt;  

The fart factory is already open, &amp; she runs it. Looks as if she is making a buck out of it too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Rockstar re: <em>If she thought she could make a buck out of it she would open a fart factory.</em>  </p>
<p>The fart factory is already open, &amp; she runs it. Looks as if she is making a buck out of it too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
