Thanks. Left you a trackback to help your readers improve eye vision naturally….

[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……

Libraries only have so much money and so much shelf space. They can only buy a FEW of the titles available.

And it is likely that the titles bought — the 10% or so that make it into a modern public library are heavily weighed to the PC side.

The system will stock conservative bestsellers because they can’t ignore them, and believe it or not, even in cesspool LA there’s about a 50/50 split in conservative/liberal patronage. One librarian remarked he was glad that we carry conservative tomes because the authors only get paid once “for that cr*p”.

Worse still is the blatant anti-white racism in promotions and hiring. Non-whites can and are promoted and hired anywhere within the system, but for example if a white person wanted a Senior Librarian job in a predominantly black community, forget it – “not a good fit”.

As we’ve noted, Palin did not attempt to ban any library books. We don’t know if Emmons’ resistance to Palin’s questions about possible censorship had anything to do with Emmons’ firing. And we have no idea if the protests had any impact on Palin at all. There simply isn’t any evidence that we can find either way. Palin did re-hire Emmons the following day, saying that she now felt she had the librarian’s backing. Emmons continued to serve as librarian until August 1999, when the Chicago Tribune reports that she resigned.

From FactCheck.org

Except that what you say happened in Alaska and the so-called “book ban”..never happened…nor did the librarian get fired, nor did the Governor have any consideration of firing or banning. This has all been debunked by all sorts of fact checkers…ie..one called Factcheck.org. But when you are a leftie hatemonger…truth be damned…hate and lies are order of the day. Great platform….lie, cheat, steal…the ends justify the means…

Did I ever say she banned any books?

And she did try to fire the librarian, but the residents of Wasilla demanded she didn’t. If you want to pretend like she didn’t even consider or attempt to fire her and invoke FactCheck.org, well I’d really like to see that link.

As usual, individuals like les or bluesoc have to come along and toss in nonsense to obfuscate the real issues

Personally I thought I was clarifying the issue by pointing out an improper (in my opinion) analogy. Moreover, I thought there would be more sympathy for PRIVATE businesses selling what they choose and PRIVATE citizens speaking out in protest. Maybe this is the wrong place for a libertarian.

Even if you find the analogy apt, weren’t you a little bothered by “[a]nd even if she did inquire about the [book banning] process, so what?”

So what? SO WHAT? Should politicians really be making those decisions?

“Less than a week after the Alaska State Senate Judiciary Committee voted to issue subpoenas in the investigation into Gov. Sarah Palin, those state employees who were ordered to testify won’t be honoring the subpoenas”

Don’t these people respect the law?

Why wouldn’t a public servant want to testify?

What are they hiding?