Palin e-mail hack update: AP won’t help feds, tech operator will

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 18, 2008 01:30 PM

The Associated Press refuses to assist federal investigators trying to find the hacker who broke into Sarah Palin’s private e-mail account.

But the operator of a browsing proxy service used by the hacker will:

Memo to law enforcement investigators tracking down who broke into Sarah Palin’s Yahoo email account: Gabriel Ramuglia might be a good place to start.

The 25-year-old webmaster and entrepreneur is the operator of Ctunnel.com, the browsing proxy service used by the group that hacked into the vice presidential candidate’s personal email account and exposed its contents to the world. While he has yet to examine his logs, he says there’s a good chance they will lead to those responsible, thanks to some carelessness on their part.

“Usually, this sort of thing would be hard to track down because it’s Yahoo email, and a lot of people use my service for that,” he told El Reg in a phone interview. “Since they were dumb enough to post a full screenshot that showed most of the [Ctunnel.com] URL, I should be able to find that in my log.”

…The information at the moment is on a server at a Chicago colocation site owned by FDC Servers. Logs are automatically flushed after seven days, so the clock is ticking for law enforcement, who presumably are under intense pressure to protect the privacy of a candidate for the White House. Of course, there’s always the possibility that Ctunnel.com was only one of multiple anonymization services the email hackers used to cover their tracks, but there’s only one way to find out.

Ramuglia said if he is contacted by law enforcement officials he will probably give them the information they seek. At time of writing, he’s received no inquiries from any law enforcement agencies, he said.

Posted in: Media Bias, Sarah Palin

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Ed Driscoll.com
  2. UPDATED: Criminal Hacking of Palin’s Email « Gunservatively!
  3. Snapped Shot
  4. The Anti-Palin hysteria Continues | Pirates! Man Your Women!
  5. Hacking Sarah Palin’s personal e-mail accounts newsworthy? Updated | Conservative247
  6. Tel-Chai Nation
  7. In plain English - how they hacked Sarah Palin's Yahoo account | blogs4God
  8. Palin personal email hacked…Gawker « Mcnorman’s Weblog
  9. Dewey Napoleon - the only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing » AP will not cooperate with federal investigation concerning Palin’s email hack
  10. Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection (65 Cases) « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  11. Michelle Malkin » Closing in on the Palin e-mail hacker Updated
  12. Tennessee Democrat family connected to theft of Palin’s private e-mail? « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
  13. Michelle Malkin » On the Palin e-mail hacker trail
  14. Michelle Malkin » An update on the Palin e-mail hacker case

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:34 pm, changer1701 said:

    First off, the AP are dirtbags, pure and simple. But why have no law enforcement agencies contacted that guy yet? I cannot believe how this is being played, I just can’t. That is a very serious invasion of privacy…laws were broken, but the meme is how she may have been using it for state business in a COVER-UP. OH MY!!! Its disgusting. Every time I say I couldn’t despise the media any more than I do right now, they prove me wrong…

  2. #2
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:35 pm, Regulus said:

    I’d be interested in knowing what the AP’s ostensible rationalization is for helping to cover for someone who has committed a federal felony.

    Somehow, I suspect I already know the real reason.

  3. #3
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:35 pm, Mister P said:

    Time to investigate AP.

  4. #4
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:37 pm, Ricco said:

    I don’t worry about AP not telling. That’s SOP for any news media organization. Just gotta build a bridge and get over it.

    It is nice to see the cooperation of someone from private industry.

  5. #5
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:39 pm, uhangtight said:

    AP not helping investigators? Isn’t that obstructing an investigation? Or is it because they are media, so they have immunity? Not sure, what their stance is but those liberal hacks cannot be called a journalistic anything, more a propagandistic rag.

    That is okay, cause I am sure it was an insider from Yahoo that was able to switch the password. That is the first place I would look..if I were lookin’..

  6. #6
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:39 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Everything we do on the Internet is tracked in a router table or device log. The bread crumbs are there is the site operators are willing to parse the data. The investigators will basically have to assemble piece by piece where traffic originate…up until it hits the Internet cafe where the “hacker” did their business at which point the logs won’t provide any visibility. Most *good* hackers have multiple layers of disguise to prevent inquiring eyes from spying on them. It’s a cat and mouse game where the *mouse* has vastly more resources at their disposal than an entire herd of cats.

  7. #7
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:39 pm, Dan Lee said:

    Ramuglia is exactly right.. When they posted to a specific website, they created a type of HTTP traffic that is very easy to find. They are screwed, & they deserved to be. Indictments within the month. I guarantee it..

  8. #8
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:40 pm, Regulus said:

    Then again, come to think of it, the AP also took the side of one of its “stringers” in Iraq when he got caught in a bomb-making factory, didn’t they?

    And was it an AP photographer who was Johnny-on-the-spot in taking pictures of Iraqi election workers being murdered in the street a few years ago?

    “Just on the other side…”

  9. #9
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:40 pm, beenthere said:

    I’m betting the Law enforcement people will let the clock run out. Then the problem goes away, not a big deal, no controversy, nothing to see here, etc.

  10. #10
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:41 pm, Dan Lee said:

    Within “A” month I meant.

  11. #11
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:41 pm, amerpun said:

    I’m very glad to see the proxy guy willing to help pursue justice.

  12. #12
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:42 pm, Mookie said:

    The AP won’t reveal their sources, just like any other news organization, nor should they. But does that apply to Gawker?

  13. #13
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:43 pm, Dan Lee said:

    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:41 pm, amerpun said:
    I’m very glad to see the proxy guy willing to help pursue justice.

    I’m glad too, but truth be told, they could have subpoenaed the records too. Whoever did it commited Federal Communications violations.

  14. #14
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:46 pm, sonofdy said:

    The AP won’t reveal their sources, just like any other news organization, nor should they. But does that apply to Gawker?

    Even when they have evidence of a crime? Would they be so stingy if they had a source that was raping little girls to death?
    If not then why not? Both are illegal.

  15. #15
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:47 pm, Mookie said:

    Even when they have evidence of a crime? Would they be so stingy if they had a source that was raping little girls to death?
    If not then why not? Both are illegal.

    There’s no comparison between the two.

  16. #16
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:48 pm, Salt said:

    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:42 pm, Mookie said:

    The AP won’t reveal their sources, just like any other news organization, nor should they. But does that apply to Gawker?

    There’s a difference between protecting anonymity of your sources and using or printing information that was criminally obtained.

    If the AP was ethical, they would assist the criminal investigation to discourage this type of behavior in the future.

  17. #17
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:49 pm, Mookie said:

    Not to mention the fact that the FBI could find copies of the emails they requested on about 10,000 different websites.

  18. #18
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:49 pm, flenser said:

    The FBI is run by and for Democrats. This will go nowhere.

  19. #19
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:50 pm, almeehan said:

    We need to hear specifically who is behind this act.

  20. #20
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:51 pm, flenser said:

    There’s no comparison between the two.

    That depends. Are the raped little girls Republicans? Palins family? If so then I can see AP obstructing an investigation.

  21. #21
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:51 pm, Mookie said:

    There’s a difference between protecting anonymity of your sources and using or printing information that was criminally obtained.

    If the AP was ethical, they would assist the criminal investigation to discourage this type of behavior in the future.

    The AP didn’t print the emails. Gawker did. The AP reported the story, along with every other news outlet in the country.

  22. #22
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:52 pm, Salt said:

    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:49 pm, flenser said:

    The FBI is run by and for Democrats. This will go nowhere.

    I believe the Secret Service is running this investigation, not the FBI.

  23. #23
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:56 pm, sonofdy said:
    Even when they have evidence of a crime? Would they be so stingy if they had a source that was raping little girls to death?

    If not then why not? Both are illegal.
    There’s no comparison between the two.

    Really? except for the ick factor, both are illegal, both are felonies, so the standard I am seeing here is that its ok when they FEEL like it. Fine.

    I know its an extreme example. But where is that line? This could easily give some sicko enough information to track down and rape Palins daughters. So what is that line?

  24. #24
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:57 pm, Salt said:

    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:51 pm, Mookie said:

    The AP didn’t print the emails. Gawker did. The AP reported the story, along with every other news outlet in the country.

    All the more reason to assist the investigators, not obstruct them. If they are not citing a source, there is really no one for them to protect. What’s the point in refusing?

  25. #25
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:57 pm, sonofdy said:

    The AP didn’t print the emails. Gawker did. The AP reported the story, along with every other news outlet in the country.

    So if the source is http://www.gwaker.com, why not just say so??? :roll:

  26. #26
    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:58 pm, beenthere said:

    I believe the Secret Service is running this investigation, not the FBI.

    Granted, but there remains the real concern about who involved in this investigation will be keeping their jobs when the Obama administration takes over. I may be overly cynical and/or paranoid about this, but I still agree with those who think this “will go nowhere.”

  27. #27
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:04 pm, Send_Me said:

    Why put this out in the open before catching the folks who did this? It’s like saying, “ok, bank robbers, here’s what we’re looking to do in order to catch you. First, we’ll…”

  28. #28
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:04 pm, BayStateRepublican said:

    On September 18th, 2008 at 1:47 pm, Mookie said:
    Even when they have evidence of a crime? Would they be so stingy if they had a source that was raping little girls to death?
    If not then why not? Both are illegal.

    There’s no comparison between the two.

    Good point Mookie, but where exactly do you draw the line?

  29. #29
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:05 pm, Mookie said:

    So if the source is http://www.gwaker.com, why not just say so???

    Why didn’t the FBI just go to Gawker in the first place?

  30. #30
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:05 pm, alpharob said:

    @Mookie

    “The AP won’t reveal their sources,
    just like any other news organization,
    nor should they.”

    BS

    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/24/us/24paper.html

    He said Virginia law required the use of a three-part balancing test
    as to whether there is a compelling need for the information [obtained from sources], whether the information is
    relevant and whether it may not be
    obtained any other way.

    Feds can file anywhere, right?
    Some states get it right. This idea that the press is somehow immune or above the law is hurting this country.
    Case in point:
    The Treason Times just decides to reveal
    the whole SWIFT tracking of terrorist monies. Nice.
    You’d think they hate this country,
    wouldn’t you?

  31. #31
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:06 pm, cheapseat said:

    didn’t i read in another thread that some of this blogs tech gurus traced the hacker back to a 20 year old son of a democrat state representative from memphis tennessee named mike kernel? if not, i apologize for making that accusation, if it’s true did he learn his ethics on your knee?

  32. #32
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:09 pm, Barry F. said:

    Hello, DOJ?! Why haven’t you called Mr. Ramuglia, yet?

  33. #33
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:10 pm, Mookie said:

    alpharob, should Judith Miller have revealed Scooter Libby’s name during the Plame investigation?

  34. #34
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:10 pm, ajmontana said:

    Patience is a virtue, they will get the turd….. He might as well turn himself in, he’s toast.

  35. #35
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:11 pm, ajmontana said:

    Just let todd drag him behind his snow machine for a couple miles… lmao

  36. #36
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:11 pm, xler8bmw said:

    I so hope if they find them it is one of Obamageddon’s campaign team!!!!!!!

  37. #37
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:12 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    At time of writing, he’s received no inquiries from any law enforcement agencies, he said.

    Not contacted yet? Does the FBI need the help of bloggers to get their job done?

    Holy $^#@%^!!!! The clock is running people. Get on it!

  38. #38
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:13 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    The only thing AP does is pump out heavily biased trash.

  39. #39
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:13 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Patience is a virtue, yes. But not if some sympathetic twit with access to those logs dumps them along with backups.

    Time is of the essence.

  40. #40
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:14 pm, Rogue said:

    The information at the moment is on a server at a Chicago colocation site owned by FDC Servers.

    Well so much for that idea…at this very moment, the Obama “Plumbers” are arranging a convienient accident for that server…

  41. #41
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:16 pm, alpharob said:

    @Mookie

    yeah… you get top google hits with that too. back atcha: shouldn’t the
    NYT do the right thing and reveal who let them in on the SWIFT thing? After all, even-handed independents agree that caused serious damage to our intelligence gathering capability.

    “Even Islamic terrorists don’t hate America like liberals do. They don’t have the energy. If they had that much energy, they’d have indoor plumbing by now.” — Ann Coulter

  42. #42
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:17 pm, Paul Revere said:

    Is this the same AP that posts fake photos? Yeah, thought so.

  43. #43
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:18 pm, allrsn said:

    What happened to subpoenas?

    O, correct, not for the left.

  44. #44
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:19 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:13 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Patience is a virtue, yes. But not if some sympathetic twit with access to those logs dumps them along with backups.

    Time is of the essence.

    Even if they dump it, it can still be recovered. No matter how many times they try to reformat the drives, etc.

  45. #45
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:26 pm, Mookie said:

    yeah… you get top google hits with that too. back atcha: shouldn’t the
    NYT do the right thing and reveal who let them in on the SWIFT thing? After all, even-handed independents agree that caused serious damage to our intelligence gathering capability.

    Personally, I think they should tell them but I think doing so sets a dangerous precedence. It’s a tough spot because anonymous sources also do a lot of good. Look at all the illegal activity going on at major corporations that was busted due to sources.

    AP refusing the FBI’s request doesn’t bother me because they can get the emails they’re looking for from hundreds of other places. Situations like SWIFT are a little murkier.

  46. #46
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:27 pm, ajmontana said:

    nj, I was talking about us not them… they will get him….

  47. #47
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:34 pm, KVal57 said:

    We all know that, if it were Obama whose email had been hacked The One, his Queen, his campaign and the rest of the party of Marx would be shrieking like harpys and calling for blood. The Republicans, eh, not so much.

  48. #48
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:37 pm, PatriotRider said:

    How about someone from the blogosphere find who is responsible and let Todd know who they are. Just the thought of a real man coming for them will make them evacuate themselves.

  49. #49
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:38 pm, sandyb said:

    Sadly, I’m betting nothing will come of it either. It’s as if law enforcement in the highest levels is either asleep, lazy beyond belief, corrupt, too blase or all of the above. Also, conservative reserve seems to have morphed into malaise. Nothing seems to be too big of a deal anymore no matter how egregious it is.

  50. #50
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:44 pm, Right_Wired said:

    As Kool-Aid would say:

    OH YEAH!

  51. #51
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:45 pm, alpharob said:

    @Mookie

    Ok. BTW, the Libby canard… keep in
    mind it was Fitzgerald out to get someone.
    Armitage was the culprit and
    let Libby get chewed up. The whole
    Plame affair is a joke, but don’t count
    on google to be much help. The libs
    have Rove sufficiently bubbled up to
    obscure what really took place.

    If Armitage had said something prior to
    Fitzgerald being appointed, the whole
    thing would have been much-ado about
    nothing.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/13/AR2006091301572.html

    Armitage’s silence for the next 2 1/2 years caused intense pain for his colleagues in government and enabled partisan Democrats in Congress to falsely accuse Rove of being my primary source. When Armitage now says he was mute because of special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald’s request, that does not explain his silent three months between his claimed first realization that he was the source and Fitzgerald’s appointment on Dec. 30, 2003. Armitage’s tardy self-disclosure is tainted because it is deceptive.

  52. #52
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:46 pm, thewariscoming said:

    All I know is if Obama’s email was hacked, the National Guard would be fully mobilized and it’d be national news for a week, all to protect his half-black butt.

  53. #53
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:50 pm, HotWeaver said:

    How about a little reporting, Michelle? Has Mr. Popcorn been contacted by police or press yet? He doesn’t need 4,000 bloggers contacting him, but a few of the top bloggers can report how well the press and police are doing their job. Someone’s going to talk to Mr. Popcorn, but I hope most will avoid flooding the poor fellow’s contact points and let those who can most efficiently report do so.

  54. #54
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:53 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    ajmontana said:

    nj, I was talking about us not them… they will get him….

    Roger that sir. I was on a roll… like Brother Blutarsky…. ;)

  55. #55
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:54 pm, conservativesRus said:

    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:46 pm, thewariscoming said:
    … all to protect his half-black butt.

    I understand it’s really only 6.25% black. (50% white and 43.75% Arab)
    If I’m wrong, somebody please correct me.

  56. #56
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:58 pm, rambler said:

    The pro-Obama skum pile just keeps growing. How can BO claim he’ll clean up Washington when he’s surrounded by thugs?

  57. #57
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:59 pm, rambler said:

    skum=scum

  58. #58
    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:59 pm, Wayfaring Stranger said:

    …there remains the real concern about who involved in this investigation will be keeping their jobs when the Obama administration takes over.

    When the Obama administration takes over? Sorry, but I’m not ready to roll over and play dead, and I doubt the Secret Service guys are either.

    And that question applies the other way: how long will those jobs last if they fail to follow through, and it’s a McCain/Palin administration to whom they have to answer?

  59. #59
    On September 18th, 2008 at 3:06 pm, vickisoup said:

    …The information at the moment is on a server at a Chicago colocation site owned by FDC Servers.

    Man, Rogue, you beat me to it and hit the nail squarely on the head. :P

  60. #60
    On September 18th, 2008 at 3:10 pm, oldcollegeguy1980 said:

    AP might be more amenable to a subpoena.

    I hope that since a friendly req

  61. #61
    On September 18th, 2008 at 3:11 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Does this not make it perfectly clear that the AP is controlled by Communists whose goal is World Revolution and establishing a Soviet America?

  62. #62
    On September 18th, 2008 at 3:11 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:
  63. #63
    On September 18th, 2008 at 3:11 pm, oldcollegeguy1980 said:

    uest was denied, the time might be right for a not so friendly request.

    AAARRRRHHH

    Michelle what about an edit function for those of us who are keyboard challenged….

  64. #64
    On September 18th, 2008 at 3:13 pm, DBNinKY said:

    AP = Angst Purveyors! It’s 9/10 all over with these people. Shame.

  65. #65
    On September 18th, 2008 at 3:21 pm, BrianNY said:

    From the AP story:

    The (illegally obtained) disclosure Wednesday raises new questions about the propriety of the Palin administration’s use of nongovernment e-mail accounts to conduct state business.

    I can also contend that this disclosure also raises new questions as to whether or not top executives at AP are still beating their spouses…but this would be a silly contention without evidence, wouldn’t it?

  66. #66
    On September 18th, 2008 at 3:37 pm, Joy said:

    I guess from now on when we speak of Big Brother and the facists who want to read our email and monitor our activities, we’re speaking of the Democrats. So much for their much vaunted Right to Privacy. That only exists when they want to kill babies.

  67. #67
    On September 18th, 2008 at 4:08 pm, purplepeep said:

    What? The Associated (w/terrorists) Press is circling it’s wagons to protect Obama? I’m shocked, just shocked!

    Who woulda guessed the media would ever do that???

  68. #68
    On September 18th, 2008 at 4:21 pm, lgm said:

    This hacking may be a crime, but it’s hardly a major one. Even the disappearances in Aruba are more significant.

    Real issue, the reason all this attention on Palin’s non-governmental email: Palin seems to have conducted state business on personal email accounts to avoid Alaska state disclosure laws. That would be a crime. She is now involved in a large scandal, troopergate, in which the decision making process (how people got fired) is the issue. These facts should be in official emails, but those emails are conveniently missing.

  69. #69
    On September 18th, 2008 at 4:21 pm, corkie said:

    On September 18th, 2008 at 2:26 pm, Mookie said:

    Personally, I think they should tell them but I think doing so sets a dangerous precedence. It’s a tough spot because anonymous sources also do a lot of good. Look at all the illegal activity going on at major corporations that was busted due to sources.

    I couldn’t disagree more. Legal disclosures could be protected. Illegal disclosures (such as releasing classified information) should be unprotected.

    What’s so dangerous about this?

  70. #70
    On September 18th, 2008 at 4:24 pm, corkie said:

    On September 18th, 2008 at 4:21 pm, lgm said:

    This hacking may be a crime, but it’s hardly a major one. Even the disappearances in Aruba are more significant.

    Puleeze, lgm. You got crazy when someone posted a picture of you as a Nazi. You have no credibility regarding whether or not this is major.

  71. #71
    On September 18th, 2008 at 4:40 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    lgm said:

    This hacking may be a crime, but it’s hardly a major one.

    wrong. it’s a major crime.

    Real Fake issue, the reason all this attention on Palin’s non-governmental email: Palin seems to have conducted state business on personal email accounts to avoid Alaska state disclosure laws. That would be a crime. She is now involved in a large scandal, troopergate, in which the decision making process (how people got fired) is the issue. These facts should be in official emails, but those emails are conveniently missing.

    This is WELL documented. She fired the Public Safety guy because he was insubordinate regarding the states budget process and Gov. Palin goals for the process and budget. He went so far as to publicly release a letter he wrote to the governor, which was the last straw. He wrote upon his exit that “he was wrong” and his former staff should endeavor to not do what he did.

    Additionally, this guy served at the pleasure of the Governor. She could have fired him without cause. But she attempted to work with him for more than 8 months, trying to get him to work with her. To no avail.

    There is NO troopergate. It’s a COMPLETE farce perpetuated by the left.

  72. #72
    On September 18th, 2008 at 4:48 pm, Rogue said:

    On September 18th, 2008 at 3:06 pm, vickisoup said:
    …The information at the moment is on a server at a Chicago colocation site owned by FDC Servers.
    Man, Rogue, you beat me to it and hit the nail squarely on the head.

    I’m surprised I was the first in 40 comments to bring that up! :P

  73. #73
    On September 18th, 2008 at 5:36 pm, CommentGuy said:

    Link

    NASHVILLE – The son of state Rep. Mike Kernell has been contacted by authorities in connection with a probe into the hacking of personal e-mail of vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, Kernell told The Tennessean.

    Kernell, a Memphis Democrat, said his 20-year-old son David had been contacted by authorities investigating the hacking of Palin’s personal e-mail account, the newspaper reported on its Web site this afternoon.

    The FBI and the Secret Service started a formal investigation Wednesday into the hacking, according to the Associated Press.

    David Kernell is a student at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville.

    More details as they develop online and in Friday’s News Sentinel.

  74. #74
    On September 18th, 2008 at 6:30 pm, lgm said:

    NJ-Aviator (#71)

    There is NO troopergate. It’s a COMPLETE farce perpetuated by the left.

    If there were nothing there, Republicans would not take the bad press of publicly and vigorously hindering the investigation. They are willing to take the heat because they know what happens if the officials do testify is worse.

  75. #75
    On September 18th, 2008 at 6:58 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    Aw, this is no big deal. Let’s read her e-mails together, shall we?

    Right to privacy for me but not for the pitbull in lipstick. What an atrocious double standard. F#@%*^& @$$#%!&s.

    Right on, Joy.

  76. #76
    On September 18th, 2008 at 7:01 pm, Sidana said:

    LGM .. you tell us. What is there?
    I guess tasering little boys and threatening murder is okay with “people” like you.

  77. #77
    On September 19th, 2008 at 12:33 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    On September 18th, 2008 at 4:21 pm, lgm said:

    This hacking may be a crime, but it’s hardly a major one.

    Who are you to judge what is a major crime? It is obvious that you don’t know right from wrong. You would support the Devil himself, if he was running as a Democrat. Oh wait, I forgot that your candidate is just like Jesus. When will you stop kicking against the goads, you reprobate scoffer?

    I’ve admitted the error of my ways and turned toward Christ for salvation. What is stopping you?

  78. #78
    On September 19th, 2008 at 2:33 am, Terry_Jim said:

    So simple a Kos-man can understand it:
    Wiretap the terrorists.
    Bad, bad, bad!!
    Hack private e-mail.
    Glad, Glad, Glad!!
    Privacy for GOP is
    Bad, bad, bad;
    For Democrats in Tennesee,
    Glad, Glad, Glad!!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Two disappearing acts, one tabloid circus

June 24, 2009 10:59 AM by Michelle Malkin

53 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Introducing the fly-by media

June 17, 2009 12:42 PM by Michelle Malkin

156 Comments | 15 Trackbacks

“The poise! The cupping!”

The Ensign affair vs. the Conyers case

June 17, 2009 06:02 AM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Letterman’s half-assed apology; Update: Palin accepts

June 15, 2009 11:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

149 Comments | 25 Trackbacks

Bad joke.

David Letterman: Perv

June 12, 2009 04:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

766 Comments | 53 Trackbacks

Why they hate us

June 11, 2009 11:42 AM by Michelle Malkin

195 Comments | 23 Trackbacks

“Liberal sexist pigs”

June 9, 2009 12:45 PM by Michelle Malkin

224 Comments | 25 Trackbacks


Categories: Media Bias, Sarah Palin



Pundit & Pundette

» Is the tide turning?