<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barack Better Not Be Banning Biden&#8217;s Beretta!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/20/barack-better-not-be-banning-bidens-beretta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/20/barack-better-not-be-banning-bidens-beretta/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:13:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nightly Ramble:McGehee is back;Sky high protest; more &#124; BitsBlog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/20/barack-better-not-be-banning-bidens-beretta/comment-page-1/#comment-464411</link>
		<dc:creator>Nightly Ramble:McGehee is back;Sky high protest; more &#124; BitsBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14871#comment-464411</guid>
		<description>[...] Another one who is decidedly showing signs of a similar addiction is See Dubya. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another one who is decidedly showing signs of a similar addiction is See Dubya. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CleanGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/20/barack-better-not-be-banning-bidens-beretta/comment-page-1/#comment-464121</link>
		<dc:creator>CleanGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14871#comment-464121</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re missing ya, See-Dubya...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re missing ya, See-Dubya&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/20/barack-better-not-be-banning-bidens-beretta/comment-page-1/#comment-463797</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14871#comment-463797</guid>
		<description>The MSM is digging into every nook and cranny of Palin. But they won&#039;t even mention the NY Times articles from Jan. 23, 1982 and Jan 24, 1982 in which Joe Biden was shrieking at and berating the Prime Minister of Israel. In the articles, there is a mention of a fellow Democrat, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, being so sickened by Biden&#039;s bullying tactics that Moynihan congratulated Begin for not putting up with Biden&#039;s bad behavior. Wonder when Brian Williams will ask Biden about this sordid episode?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MSM is digging into every nook and cranny of Palin. But they won&#8217;t even mention the NY Times articles from Jan. 23, 1982 and Jan 24, 1982 in which Joe Biden was shrieking at and berating the Prime Minister of Israel. In the articles, there is a mention of a fellow Democrat, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, being so sickened by Biden&#8217;s bullying tactics that Moynihan congratulated Begin for not putting up with Biden&#8217;s bad behavior. Wonder when Brian Williams will ask Biden about this sordid episode?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goldwater Knight</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/20/barack-better-not-be-banning-bidens-beretta/comment-page-1/#comment-463382</link>
		<dc:creator>Goldwater Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 22:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14871#comment-463382</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Make no mistake about it, the White House WILL create some sort of foreign policy issue in October to try and give McCain a boost, and McCain will play the Rev. Wright card eventually. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Whoa the animal has a voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Make no mistake about it, the White House WILL create some sort of foreign policy issue in October to try and give McCain a boost, and McCain will play the Rev. Wright card eventually. </p></blockquote>
<p>Whoa the animal has a voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goldwater Knight</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/20/barack-better-not-be-banning-bidens-beretta/comment-page-1/#comment-463381</link>
		<dc:creator>Goldwater Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 22:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14871#comment-463381</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Having said that, I can see this preposterously early voting benefiting Obama. For one thing, he gets to start locking in votes while the financial crisis is topic A and has voters fleeing the GOP. Second, he gets to lock in votes before a possible October surprise–whether it’s a national security crisis ginned up by the White House or some below-the-belt ad from McCain (probably Wright or Ayers related). Third, mechanical changes like this tend to favor the better-organized campaign, since they’re in a better position to exploit any new opportunities. That’s almost certainly the Obama campaign in this case. I’d guess Obama will do a better job identifying potential early voters and getting them to the polls,* which, given the extremely long early-voting window, could result in a significant advantage.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The moron has spoken. Expect the opposite to happen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Having said that, I can see this preposterously early voting benefiting Obama. For one thing, he gets to start locking in votes while the financial crisis is topic A and has voters fleeing the GOP. Second, he gets to lock in votes before a possible October surprise–whether it’s a national security crisis ginned up by the White House or some below-the-belt ad from McCain (probably Wright or Ayers related). Third, mechanical changes like this tend to favor the better-organized campaign, since they’re in a better position to exploit any new opportunities. That’s almost certainly the Obama campaign in this case. I’d guess Obama will do a better job identifying potential early voters and getting them to the polls,* which, given the extremely long early-voting window, could result in a significant advantage.</p></blockquote>
<p>The moron has spoken. Expect the opposite to happen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDinTX</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/20/barack-better-not-be-banning-bidens-beretta/comment-page-1/#comment-463372</link>
		<dc:creator>JDinTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 21:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14871#comment-463372</guid>
		<description>If Obama and Biden pose together, maybe they will shoot each other&#039;s foot off right after shooting their mouth off.

Has anyone besides me been receiving the e-mails the past few days about Biden stepping down as the VP nominee claiming to have health problems?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Obama and Biden pose together, maybe they will shoot each other&#8217;s foot off right after shooting their mouth off.</p>
<p>Has anyone besides me been receiving the e-mails the past few days about Biden stepping down as the VP nominee claiming to have health problems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Grant</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/20/barack-better-not-be-banning-bidens-beretta/comment-page-1/#comment-463365</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 21:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14871#comment-463365</guid>
		<description>mistressjustice said:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Posted by Ashish on 09.21.2008:

&quot;Make no mistake about it, the White House WILL create some sort of foreign policy issue in October to try and give McCain a boost,&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Translation:
Grassy knoll! Grassy knoll! Fire doesn&#039;t melt steel! Attica! R-o-n P-a-u-l!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mistressjustice said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Posted by Ashish on 09.21.2008:</p>
<p>&#8220;Make no mistake about it, the White House WILL create some sort of foreign policy issue in October to try and give McCain a boost,&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Translation:<br />
Grassy knoll! Grassy knoll! Fire doesn&#8217;t melt steel! Attica! R-o-n P-a-u-l!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Grant</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/20/barack-better-not-be-banning-bidens-beretta/comment-page-1/#comment-463360</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14871#comment-463360</guid>
		<description>A Beretta? Biden must carry it in his purse with his tampax and hair plug cream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Beretta? Biden must carry it in his purse with his tampax and hair plug cream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happy2behere</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/20/barack-better-not-be-banning-bidens-beretta/comment-page-1/#comment-463355</link>
		<dc:creator>happy2behere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14871#comment-463355</guid>
		<description>see-dub:

Ask your friend, does he know anybody, anywhere, that has succeeded in banning books in the last few decades?  Or is the book banning thing the big red herring it has always been?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see-dub:</p>
<p>Ask your friend, does he know anybody, anywhere, that has succeeded in banning books in the last few decades?  Or is the book banning thing the big red herring it has always been?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mistressjustice</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/20/barack-better-not-be-banning-bidens-beretta/comment-page-1/#comment-463330</link>
		<dc:creator>mistressjustice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14871#comment-463330</guid>
		<description>Spot on.  Nail on head from 411mania.com citing NOAM.

Early Voting 
Posted by Ashish on 09.21.2008 

Early voting has already started in some states... 

Early voting has already started in Virginia (started last week) and starts in several other states this week. This is a major advantage for Obama.

Having said that, I can see this preposterously early voting benefiting Obama. For one thing, he gets to start locking in votes while the financial crisis is topic A and has voters fleeing the GOP. Second, he gets to lock in votes before a possible October surprise--whether it&#039;s a national security crisis ginned up by the White House or some below-the-belt ad from McCain (probably Wright or Ayers related). Third, mechanical changes like this tend to favor the better-organized campaign, since they&#039;re in a better position to exploit any new opportunities. That&#039;s almost certainly the Obama campaign in this case. I&#039;d guess Obama will do a better job identifying potential early voters and getting them to the polls,* which, given the extremely long early-voting window, could result in a significant advantage. 
Remember the early voting advantage Hillary had during the primaries? She was the favorite for so long that many people voted early for her. Then, when they changed their minds and switched to Obama, it was too late to change their vote. We could see a bit of that here as well. The more people that vote early, the smaller the opportunity for McCain to make up ground gets. &lt;strong&gt;Make no mistake about it, the White House WILL create some sort of foreign policy issue in October to try and give McCain a boost, and McCain will play the Rev. Wright card eventually. &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on.  Nail on head from 411mania.com citing NOAM.</p>
<p>Early Voting<br />
Posted by Ashish on 09.21.2008 </p>
<p>Early voting has already started in some states&#8230; </p>
<p>Early voting has already started in Virginia (started last week) and starts in several other states this week. This is a major advantage for Obama.</p>
<p>Having said that, I can see this preposterously early voting benefiting Obama. For one thing, he gets to start locking in votes while the financial crisis is topic A and has voters fleeing the GOP. Second, he gets to lock in votes before a possible October surprise&#8211;whether it&#8217;s a national security crisis ginned up by the White House or some below-the-belt ad from McCain (probably Wright or Ayers related). Third, mechanical changes like this tend to favor the better-organized campaign, since they&#8217;re in a better position to exploit any new opportunities. That&#8217;s almost certainly the Obama campaign in this case. I&#8217;d guess Obama will do a better job identifying potential early voters and getting them to the polls,* which, given the extremely long early-voting window, could result in a significant advantage.<br />
Remember the early voting advantage Hillary had during the primaries? She was the favorite for so long that many people voted early for her. Then, when they changed their minds and switched to Obama, it was too late to change their vote. We could see a bit of that here as well. The more people that vote early, the smaller the opportunity for McCain to make up ground gets. <strong>Make no mistake about it, the White House WILL create some sort of foreign policy issue in October to try and give McCain a boost, and McCain will play the Rev. Wright card eventually. </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rktkr</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/20/barack-better-not-be-banning-bidens-beretta/comment-page-1/#comment-463310</link>
		<dc:creator>rktkr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14871#comment-463310</guid>
		<description>No matter how hard I try to get out, they keep pulling me back in!

(See-Dubya channels Al Pacino)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter how hard I try to get out, they keep pulling me back in!</p>
<p>(See-Dubya channels Al Pacino)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brooklyn red</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/20/barack-better-not-be-banning-bidens-beretta/comment-page-1/#comment-463293</link>
		<dc:creator>brooklyn red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 17:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14871#comment-463293</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care if they promise free government issued &lt;strike&gt;cheese&lt;/strike&gt; guns for everyone... I don&#039;t believe a word they say. Well except for the higher taxes thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care if they promise free government issued <strike>cheese</strike> guns for everyone&#8230; I don&#8217;t believe a word they say. Well except for the higher taxes thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: faithnomore</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/20/barack-better-not-be-banning-bidens-beretta/comment-page-1/#comment-463287</link>
		<dc:creator>faithnomore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 17:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14871#comment-463287</guid>
		<description>Biden&#039;s always been antigun...he&#039;s lying...using hitler-speak to pre-fend (pretend to defend)the imaginary &quot;sporting&quot; firearm...the only thing he ever shoots is his mouth off...and he doesn&#039;t even pretend to let you do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biden&#8217;s always been antigun&#8230;he&#8217;s lying&#8230;using hitler-speak to pre-fend (pretend to defend)the imaginary &#8220;sporting&#8221; firearm&#8230;the only thing he ever shoots is his mouth off&#8230;and he doesn&#8217;t even pretend to let you do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpeakEasy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/20/barack-better-not-be-banning-bidens-beretta/comment-page-1/#comment-463286</link>
		<dc:creator>SpeakEasy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 17:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14871#comment-463286</guid>
		<description>Very nice St.Louis. I suspect this also explains todays classrooms:

OUT: A balckboard, the blank slate of a young black mind, gets written on with white chalk, the lies of the white oppressors.

IN: A whiteboard, the blank slate of a young white mind, gets written on with multi-colored markers, the truth of the multi-cultural world.

Or maybe it is just Occams razor: they just easier to use and clean up easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice St.Louis. I suspect this also explains todays classrooms:</p>
<p>OUT: A balckboard, the blank slate of a young black mind, gets written on with white chalk, the lies of the white oppressors.</p>
<p>IN: A whiteboard, the blank slate of a young white mind, gets written on with multi-colored markers, the truth of the multi-cultural world.</p>
<p>Or maybe it is just Occams razor: they just easier to use and clean up easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacEamonn</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/20/barack-better-not-be-banning-bidens-beretta/comment-page-1/#comment-463285</link>
		<dc:creator>MacEamonn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 17:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=14871#comment-463285</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;California–moderate Republican type&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Someone please define what kind of person this is and why we care what he &quot;thinks&quot; (thinking is probably not this persons strong suit anyway).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>California–moderate Republican type</p></blockquote>
<p>Someone please define what kind of person this is and why we care what he &#8220;thinks&#8221; (thinking is probably not this persons strong suit anyway).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

