Kill the bailout: Phones ringing off the hook; student loans, car debt added to proposal

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 23, 2008 10:27 PM

We don’t have to have this trillion-dollar bailout shoved down our throats.

You can make a difference.

Phones are ringing off the hook. Peter Viles at L.A.Land:

A key quote in this morning’s Senate hearing about the Paulson bailout is worth repeating. This comes from Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown, a Democrat:

“Like my colleagues, my phones have been ringing off the hook. The sentiment from Ohioans about this proposal is universally negative.”

Not “overwhelmingly negative.” Not “deeply suspicious.” Not “extremely upset.” Universally negative.

I’ll state the obvious: Members of Congress aren’t generally in the habit of passing historic and spectacularly unpopular legislation five weeks before election day.

Make your voice heard now. Every second counts: 202-224-3121.

***

Quotable: “‘Just because God created the world in seven days doesn’t mean we have to pass this bill in seven days,’ said Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas.”

Or at all.

You might want to make a special effort to phone John McCain’s office. He’s waffling and wavering and straddling. Mr. Maverick needs a clue.

Update: Student loans, car loans, and credit card debt have been snuck into the bailout proposal No. No No. Hellllllll, no.

!!!!!!! (Hat tip: STACLU, Pursuing Holiness)

In the dark of night over the weekend when most people were snoozing, the Treasury dramatically expanded its bailout plan to include buying student loans, car loans, credit card debt and any other “troubled” assets held by banks.

The changes, which were included in draft language that also opened the bailout program to foreign banks with extensive loan operations in the United States, potentially added tens of billions of dollars to the cost of the program.

Although it was a major addition to what was already the nation’s largest-ever bailout, it did not become part of the debate between Democrats and the Treasury over details of the program. A Monday counterproposal by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher J. Dodd included such consumer loans as well as mortgages, just as the Treasury’s draft did Saturday night.

“The costs of the bailout will be significantly higher than originally considered or acknowledged,” said Joshua Rosner, managing director of Graham Fisher & Co., who charged that the Treasury and Federal Reserve have not been “forthright” about the ultimate cost to the public. The plan gives Treasury the discretion to buy the non-mortgage loans and securities in consultation with the Fed.

Conservatives cited the move as a sign that the massive plan to take over bad mortgage debt already is opening the door to further government bailouts.

***

Get your GOP senator off the fence:

Many members of the U.S. Senate blasted the Bush administration’s Wall Street bailout plan Tuesday, but no senator has come forward so far with an explicit pledge to kill the $700 billion proposal.

The rules of the Senate, unlike the House , give individual lawmakers substantial power to delay or halt legislation, but three Senate aides said there were no clear signs yet of that power being exercised.

As the Senate Banking Committee held a hearing on the plan put forward by the Treasury Department, aides said much would depend on Alabama Sen. Richard Shelby, the committee’s top Republican, who was sharply critical at the hearing.

The outlook for Treasury’s plan would dim greatly if Shelby were to move to block the bill that is expected to emerge soon from congressional debate over the plan, the aides said.

The Democrat-controlled Congress and the Republican Bush administration are in negotiations over specifics of the bailout bill, with the House aiming to get legislation to a floor vote possibly Friday…

…Other senators, including Republicans Jim Bunning of Kentucky and Jim DeMint of South Carolina, have expressed strong concerns.

But the aides said these lawmakers also have stopped short of warning they would work to block the bill.

***

Previous:

Kill the bailout: Newt Gingrich gets on board
Kill the bailout: The foreign bank angle
Kill the bailout: Will the real fiscal conservatives please stand up?
Why Henry Paulson must be “contained”
The Mother of All Bailouts = The Death of Fiscal Conservatism

Posted in: Subprime crisis

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Call to Action: Kill the Bill | The American Pundit
  2. Federal bailout expands to include student and car loans : Pursuing Holiness
  3. eCache » Blog Archive » At What Cost?
  4. Make the call….. « LeadChucker’s blog
  5. Kill the Bill: ‘No’ To The Bailout - Call (202) 224-3121 « Pocket Change - Now Lint Free!
  6. Webloggin » Kill the Bill: 202-224-3121, If They Don’t Listen Vote Them Out
  7. Bailing On The Bailout Bill « Blog Entry « Dr. Melissa Clouthier
  8. Opposition Mounts to Paulson Plan
  9. Kill [the] Bill: We DON’T Have to Have this Bailout « Truth and Reason
  10. Opposition Mounts to Paulson Plan | Adam's Blog
  11. Drumwaster's Rants
  12. BizzyBlog » Things I’d Lie to Post About Today ….. (092408, Morning)
  13. Right Wing News
  14. Kill the Bill! « Decidedly Right
  15. WeatherOutpost12
  16. Swamp Hermit’s *QUICK* Bits « The Swamp Hermit’s Report
  17. “We Don’t Have To Have This $Trillion Bailout Shoved Down Our Throats” - Black Bear Blog - Black Bear Blog - The Politics of Hunting, Fishing and the Outdoors. Protecting our American Heritage.
  18. “We Don’t Have To Have This $Trillion Bailout Shoved Down Our Throats” : Conservative Zone
  19. My obligatory Stop the Bailout and Cuff Dodd post. « Illiberal Virtuosity
  20. Michelle Malkin » Here comes the $25 billion automakers’ bailout
  21. Kill the Billout « Kevin’s Korner
  22. There's My Two Cents
  23. Random-American » Bailouts and baseballs through windows
  24. Reid believes the Senate is now only 98 members strong… « The Sadim Touch
  25. Good ‘ol Boy Economy Wreckers « ULTIMATE TRUTH
  26. $700 Billion Bailout: See no evil. Hear no evil. Speak no evil. (UPDATED) « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
  27. The Courage to do Nothing « Constitution Club
  28. Michelle Malkin » All aboard the bailout bandwagon? Hell, no!
  29. OpenMarket.org » Archive » Bailout Gets More Costly Due to “Bipartisan” Deal; Foolish Limits on Foreclosure Should Be Removed

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #466419
    On September 24th, 2008 at 6:26 am, Socky said:

    In the dark of night over the weekend when most people were snoozing, the Treasury dramatically expanded its bailout plan to include buying student loans, car loans, credit card debt and any other “troubled” assets held by banks.

    So, not only am I being boned for idiotically paying my mortgage on time, I am also going to get boned for repaying my car loans, student loans and credit cards on time? And the people who just borrowed more than they could afford get to walk away scot-free? How the hell does that work?

  2. #466420
    On September 24th, 2008 at 6:41 am, et said:

    Bankruptcy is now a class action affair.

  3. #466423
    On September 24th, 2008 at 6:51 am, Azygos said:

    Anybody else besides me think that if the government can spend 1 trillion to bail out these companies that they are overtaxing us? Instead of giving a trillion dollars to quasi-government companies give it back to the people it was stolen from.

  4. #466425
    On September 24th, 2008 at 6:56 am, zorro said:

    I will be calling our RINO and Democrap representatives today, for sure.

    By the way, great column Michelle, “Illegal Immigration and the Mortgage Mess” it’s at townhall right now, but I’m sure it will be posted here shortly.

  5. #466426
    On September 24th, 2008 at 6:58 am, ajmontana said:

    nyc, prolly the escort for the Achmanutjobs plane the he!! outa here.

  6. #466427
    On September 24th, 2008 at 6:59 am, rplatt said:

    This government and its incompetent, self serving, brain dead politicians is absolutely useless. Trust and faith in the government is gone . . . watch for the flame out because we’re about ready to crash and burn.

  7. #466433
    On September 24th, 2008 at 7:27 am, DanME said:

    I’m a long time conservative Republican, but on this one I think Michelle is Way Off Base. In fact she’s making me very angry.

    I listened to most of the Senate hearing yesterday. I have a lot more confidence in Ben and Hank than I have in all those dim wit senators put together. After all Ben spend his whole professional career studying the depression, what caused it,and what mistakes were made.

    The media is doing the country a great disservice in the way they are reporting this crisis. In the end, the taxpayer will NOT be out for $700B. It will be a lot less if managed correctly. Please study the history of the previous rescues and the Chrysler loan.

    The primary blame for this mess rests with Congress. They pushed the financial community to make home ownership “affordable” for lower income people who in more sane time could not qualify for a 15/30 year fixed mortgage with 10 percent down. Congress also caused this mess by participating in the mismanagement of the two GSEs.

    It’s time for the public to wake up and get behind this financial plan. Yes, there should be over sight and yes people on Wall Street who crested fraud should be prosecuted.

    Come on Michelle, get out of your ideological skin and lets move forward.

    Michelle, what is your plans??????

  8. #466434
    On September 24th, 2008 at 7:28 am, Chief RZ said:

    No money for people who refuse to work and pay their debts.

  9. #466437
    On September 24th, 2008 at 7:33 am, Socky said:

    It will be a lot less if managed correctly.

    And the borders would be secure, if they were managed correctly.

  10. #466439
    On September 24th, 2008 at 7:35 am, navywife91 said:

    I wonder if I can get some kind of refund on my paid student loans? Yep, I actually paid them back. What a concept.

    I’d love to find some of these people who are in default and find out why they “can’t” pay their loans back. Maybe that degree in cultural anthropology wasn’t such a good idea after all. Idiots. We could get John Stossel to investigate. I’m sure he would find that a majority of them are choosing not to pay them back.

  11. #466440
    On September 24th, 2008 at 7:37 am, rambler said:

    I went to the bank and got a comment about the bank whose name was on the check. And so it begins.

  12. #466441
    On September 24th, 2008 at 7:37 am, guitarplayer said:

    I’m sure he would find that a majority of them are choosing not to pay them back.

    I wouldn’t be surprised. People like us who are paying their debts are actually doing worse than people who don’t and are getting bailed out.

  13. #466442
    On September 24th, 2008 at 7:46 am, JVsbrother said:

    One issue not being discussed is how this expenditure will affect DoD budgets. I anticipate that the military’ ability to maintain and upgrade systems will be greatly impacted. Look for the armed services to be required to delay or elimanate program plans.

    Rewarding those who lost at the craps table to be made whole is BS

  14. #466444
    On September 24th, 2008 at 7:48 am, Rohan said:

    Excellent article on how the Dems one of the MAIN reasons we have this mess:

    Bloomberg article

  15. #466446
    On September 24th, 2008 at 7:52 am, navywife91 said:

    I wouldn’t be surprised. People like us who are paying their debts are actually doing worse than people who don’t and are getting bailed out.

    Those types of people don’t care about credit scores because so many lenders are willing to give them money for cars, houses, credit cards, furniture, etc. There seems to be no incentive to pay back the money they spent. I am trying to raise my girls to be smart when it comes to money. I’ve still got learning to do, but they can learn from my mistakes.

  16. #466453
    On September 24th, 2008 at 8:07 am, wrcnossen said:

    History has never been a strong point with the fools on the hill. Government intervention made the great depression longer and deeper than in needed to be. People could not depend on the system to work because they never knew what the government would do to it next, which destroyed confidence and the investment that relies on confidence that the rules are reliable.

    An economy cannot run on the whim of a few cowards looking to do “something” to protect their jobs.

    KILL THE BILL

  17. #466455
    On September 24th, 2008 at 8:08 am, jsr said:

    This bailout will only delay the inevitable. The US is starting to pay the price for years and years of living in a financial la-la land where everybody gets everything and nobody is left out. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid failures are looming on the horizon. Consumers have been spending like drunken sailors for 20 years. Endless government programs meant to make life more fair funded with deficit spending. Shielding children from harsh realities of life and teaching them they can have it all without ever sacrificing or delaying their gratification. Refusal to deal with the flood of cheap labor coming across the borders illegally. Things are starting to come to a head and no bailout will change the inevitable. Americans simply have to face reality, start living within their means and make those that won’t carry their weight suffer for their own slackness. Being stupid and irresponsible should hurt. We are about to find this out as a nation, no matter who wins in November.

  18. #466456
    On September 24th, 2008 at 8:08 am, ChrisFromGermany said:

    The mortgage crisis explained by two British comedians, Bird and Fortune:

    http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=mzJmTCYmo9g

    The video is from February 2008 and – sadly enough – explains the crisis better than any of the CNBC experts. Insane credits handed out to people who bankers very well know would never be able to pay the money back:

    BIRD: Ah yes, the so-called subprime situation.

    FORTUNE: How does that work exactly?

    BIRD: Well, imagine if you can, an unemployed black man sitting on a crumbling porch somewhere in Alabama, and a chap comes along and says would you like to buy this house before it falls down, and why don’t you let me lend you the money?

    FORTUNE: And is this chap who says this a banker?

    BIRD: Oh no no, he’s a mortgage salesman. His income depends entirely on the number of mortgages he can arrange.

    FORTUNE: So his judgement to arrange mortgages is completely objective.

    BIRD: Completely objective, yes.

    FORTUNE: And what happens next?

    BIRD: Well this debt, these mortgages, are taken by a bank and packaged together with a lot of other similar debts –

    FORTUNE: Without going into much detail about what actually –

    BIRD: Without going into any detail at all. It’s far too boring. And so this debt moves onto Wall Street, and it’s absolutely extraordinary what happens there: somehow this package of dodgy debts stops being a package of dodgy debts and starts being what we call a structured investment vehicle.

    FORTUNE: And then someone like you comes along and buys it.

    BIRD: I buy it, yes. And then I ring up someone in Tokyo and say I’ve got this package, do you want to buy it? And they say what’s in it? And I say I haven’t got the faintest idea and they say how much do you want for it and I say a hundred million dollars and they say fine, that’s it. And that’s the market

    FORTUNE: And presumably, that kind of thing can happen several times to the same package. And every time it does, of course, then you and someone like you will get a fee and a markup and so on.

    BIRD: A profit. Yes. Well you can’t expect us to do it for nothing. It’s hard work.

    http://www.salon.com/tech/htww/2007/11/30/bird_and_fortune_on_subprime/

  19. #466460
    On September 24th, 2008 at 8:11 am, SoonerMarine said:

    If I understand this proposal correctly (and that’s certainly debatable since my expertise is not in the economic realm) the government will underwrite or secure these subprime and high risk loans. The individuals that took out the loans are not being forgiven their debt. They still owe the money. That said, there’s no question that a number of people will default on these loans. They will suffer the consequences in bankruptcy and bad credit ratings. For others the gov’t will attempt to revise the terms of the loan so that they can continue paying, albeit at reduced rates. So, nobody is being forgiven their debt. But, the taxpayers are going to take the hit on all the defaulting loans instead of the large private corporations or the two GSEs, Fred Mac and Fannie Mae. And, the rationale for doing this is because otherwise these defaulting loans would cause those institutions to go under, creating a deepening financial crises in the country and threatening our entire economy. Is this correct? If so, it really stinks, and there’s a lot of blame to be assigned, but what’s the alternative?

  20. #466475
    On September 24th, 2008 at 8:24 am, PhredE said:

    “If the American people ever allow private banks to
    control the issue of their money, first by inflation
    and then by deflation, the banks and corporations
    that will grow up around them (around the banks),
    will deprive the people of their property until their
    children will wake up homeless on the continent
    their fathers conquered. ”
    -Thomas Jefferson

    No – do not bail out crooked investment bankers on Wall Street. Let them fall early and hard.

    Godspeed to the investigators within the FBI to find and prosecute any and all malfeasance.

  21. #466487
    On September 24th, 2008 at 8:32 am, tampadave said:

    I wonder whether we (GOP) are better off if the Community Organizer wins this election. This allows our Party the opportunity to re-group as an activist minority opposition party. We can reform our vision and emerge yet stronger. I have supreme confidence that an Obama-Pelosi-Reid administration will screw up America totally. Socialism, political correctness, unchecked immigration, wealth re-distribution, a depleted military, and decreased American international standing via capitulation to Chinese, Russian and Middle East interests will ultimately decrease Democratic standing with the public. Obama is likely to be a one-term president with a historical rating equivalent to Jimmy Carter, given current economic conditions, his policy proposals, and lack of experience.

  22. #466515
    On September 24th, 2008 at 9:08 am, DirkBelig said:

    @tampadave – Yeah, that’s an appealing thought, but with Israel (and possible a couple of American cities) a radioactive wasteland, three (or more) fascism-friendly Supremes installed on the bench to find (or lose) whatever rights the Obamessiah and the fascist Dems want in or out, and our economy in ruins, who would want to take back the wreckage in 2012?

    Sorry, Obama and the Dems must be defeated NOW. Too bad there isn’t a party and candidates up to the task. When bloggers and commenters are able to articulate winning strategies (e.g. run ads pointing out that the Dems blocked reform in 2005) but the Stupid Party remains silent and McCain rants on like a lunatic about how putting Andy Cuomo on the case, it’s hard to feel any other way than we, as a nation, are totally screwed.

  23. #466588
    On September 24th, 2008 at 9:45 am, DBNinKY said:

    Were the Republicans back then powerless to stop Dodd from enforcing his will?

    No, but they were scared. They held the majority by the thinnest of margins and didn’t want any negative press to decrease their numbers, which is what would have happened had they given the MSM ammo of portraying the Republicans as opposing home ownership for low-income families.

    What’s more, you know this, so why are you asking, unless it’s just to push-back for the Dodd and the Dems?

  24. #466599
    On September 24th, 2008 at 9:53 am, Old Scout said:

    Forget the phone. It’s so easy to send a quick message to your senator.

    http://xxxxxxx.senate.gov Just fill in the xxxxx with the last name of your senator. You’ll be at their home page. Just click on the contact me link.

    You’ll see a web form where I suggest you leave a polite but determined message.

    I’ve emailed both my senators about my disapproval.

  25. #466610
    On September 24th, 2008 at 9:59 am, gippergirl said:

    Called the CA senators but their voicemail was full…called John McCain’s office and was able to leave a message…my message was that if he votes in favor of this then he has lost MY vote.

  26. #466611
    On September 24th, 2008 at 9:59 am, Veretax said:

    I just emailed by representative, and both of My senators… Although both are democrats, its high time something was done.

  27. #466615
    On September 24th, 2008 at 10:04 am, JT said:

    Well I called my Republican congressman. He’s not for the bailout. I also called my Dem NJ senators Tweedledumb and Tweedledummer. I also called McCain.

    I said no bailout NEVER.

  28. #466632
    On September 24th, 2008 at 10:17 am, right4life said:

    but with Israel a radioactive wasteland

    that ain’t gonna happen. the Ezekial scenario...

    (and possible a couple of American cities)

    that may happen…although it will most likely be an EMP over the northeast…

  29. #466675
    On September 24th, 2008 at 10:48 am, fluffy said:

    On September 24th, 2008 at 9:53 am, Old Scout said:

    Forget the phone. It’s so easy to send a quick message to your senator.

    http://xxxxxxx.senate.gov Just fill in the xxxxx with the last name of your senator. You’ll be at their home page. Just click on the contact me link.

    You’ll see a web form where I suggest you leave a polite but determined message.

    I’ve emailed both my senators about my disapproval.

    I did the same. Both Kerry & Kennedy wanted a phone number, so I entered their office phone.

  30. #466755
    On September 24th, 2008 at 11:34 am, Wildcatter1980 said:

    OMG! Sherrod Brown speaking up!?! My Democrat senator may actually restore my faith in him.

    I just wonder if he also will admit that it was Democrat “feel good” and “politically correct” legislation and strong arm tactics that laid the foundations for this crisis?

    I have written all 3 of my representatives in Washington multiple times stressing my lack of support for bailing out these institutions and costing us money we do not have. When I get some time–maybe this Friday evening–I’m going to put together my own blog posting summarizing this mess. I want to show how this came about because of improper government/political meddling in the mortgage loan marketplace and how it has led to the unintended consequence of bringing our financial system to almost total collapse.

  31. #466784
    On September 24th, 2008 at 11:46 am, Bob69 said:

    I already sent an Email, then tried to call the listed number, was sent to Mcains voice mail but…..his box was full….. keep on trucking….

  32. #466869
    On September 24th, 2008 at 12:33 pm, greenfairie said:

    I’ve sometimes struggled to pay my student loans but I’ve always made payments, even if I had to pull all kinds of strings to do so or pay them late. I have ZERO sympathy for defaulters. I sucked it up, so can they.

    We’re really becoming a nanny state where we have the government saving us from our own debts! No responsibility!

  33. #466904
    On September 24th, 2008 at 12:55 pm, tettes said:

    On September 24th, 2008 at 7:48 am, Rohan said:

    Excellent article on how the Dems one of the MAIN reasons we have this mess:

    Bloomberg article

    Two things:

    1) That’s not an “article”. It’s an opinion piece. There is a HUGE difference.

    2) The author works for the McCain campaign. Did you notice the note at the bottom?

    (Kevin Hassett, director of economic-policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, is a Bloomberg News columnist. He is an adviser to Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona in the 2008 presidential election. The opinions expressed are his own.)

    Like many of us, I’m reading as much as I can to try and understand the detail of this financial mess. And it’s not easy. Certainly columns like this only serve to distract and distort reality.

  34. #467005
    On September 24th, 2008 at 1:39 pm, right4life said:

    That’s not an “article”. It’s an opinion piece. There is a HUGE difference

    in the press? you’re kidding right?

    Like many of us, I’m reading as much as I can to try and understand the detail of this financial mess. And it’s not easy.

    its real easy, if we hadn’t forced banks to give loans to illegals, and others unable to pay it back, to ostensibly combat ‘racism’ then we wouldn’t have this mess. If we didn’t have Freddie and Fannie to facilitate this mess, it wouldn’t have happened. who was running those ‘companies’ Gorelick and Raines….democrats.

  35. #467196
    On September 24th, 2008 at 2:52 pm, TxSkirt said:

    gippergirl, sadly my bet is that he doesn’t even show up to vote. This is too much of a hot potato for him. Wouldn’t it be great if he showed the same courage that he showed in Hanoi, voted against this bill and gave all the “aye” voters a thumbs up as he walked back to his seat? Sigh.

  36. #467504
    On September 24th, 2008 at 4:24 pm, Rohan said:

    Tettes – OK, opinion piece. (Like articles today are so impartial!?!?! What a difference!) So what about it was incorrect? I have been reading a lot, too. The link gave a pretty good idea of how this happened. Are there contributory causes? Sure. But the dems have a lot of the blame on their shoulders.

  37. #467676
    On September 24th, 2008 at 5:54 pm, faithnomore said:

    KILL HERE, KILL NOW, PAY LESS

You must be logged in to post a comment.

SEIU leads new banking shakedown campaign

October 25, 2009 11:25 PM by Michelle Malkin

35 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

Punchline of the day

October 19, 2009 10:33 PM by Michelle Malkin

45 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

So, Paulson lied? He’s misled America from Day One

October 5, 2009 12:20 PM by Michelle Malkin

49 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

The Naked Emperor revisited.

Another shining example of Obama “efficiency”

September 16, 2009 10:03 AM by Michelle Malkin

95 Comments | 1 Trackback


Categories: Subprime crisis



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook