Palin e-mal hacker suspect indicted; at least one other person illegally accessed account

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 8, 2008 10:23 AM

I told you the other day that the DOJ probe was “ongoing.” And now we have an indictment. Yes, it’s Tennessee Democrat lawmaker Mike Kernell’s son, David Kernell. No more wild and carefree campus parties for you, son.

A University of Tennessee student who is the son of a Memphis legislator has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of hacking Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin’s personal e-mail.

David C. Kernell, 20, was indicted by a federal grand jury in Knoxville for intentionally accessing without authorization the e-mail account of Palin, the governor of Alaska and Sen. John McCain’s running mate, according to U.S. Attorney James R. Dedrick.

Dedrick said Kernell, the son of state Rep. Mike Kernell, D-Memphis, turned himself in to federal authorities today for arrest.

He is to be arraigned before U.S. Magistrate Judge C. Clifford Shirley.

The single-count indictment, returned Tuesday and unsealed today, alleges that on approximately Sept. 16, 2008, Kernell, obtained unauthorized access to Palin’s personal e-mail account by allegedly resetting the account password.

According to the indictment, after answering a series of security questions that allowed him to reset the password and gain access to the e-mail account, Kernell allegedly read the contents of the account and made screenshots of the e-mail directory, e-mail content and other personal information.

According to the indictment, Kernell posted screenshots of the e-mail and other personal information to a public Web site. Kernell also allegedly posted the new e-mail account password, thus providing access to the account by others.

Exactly as it was described in my post here.

Kernell faces five years in prison.

I hope he’ll serve every day of it.

***

The Smoking Gun
has the indictment. It discloses that “At least one other individual successfully used the reset password to access Governor Palin’s e-mail account.” I wonder if that person has been identified?

***
Previous:

An update on the Palin e-mail hacker case

On the Palin e-mail hacker trail

AP reporter e-mails: Yeah, it’s all Palin’s fault

Palin e-mail hack update: AP won’t help feds, tech operator will

The story behind the Palin e-mail hacking

Sarah Palin’s private e-mail hacked, family photos raided; cesspool blog gloats; feds investigate

Posted in: Sarah Palin

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Newsflash: Palin E-mail Hacker Indicted | Jeffrey A. Setaro
  2. The Other McCain: DAVID KERNELL INDICTED
  3. JammieWearingFool
  4. Palin E-mail Hacker Indicted « Trust, But Verify
  5. Palin E-Mail Hacker Indicted | The Daily Conservative
  6. Dana Milbank Provides Funny Whine, Plus Palin Today » Pirate’s Cove — Barracuda Patrol!
  7. Pirate's Cove
  8. Stop The ACLU
  9. Feds indict son Of Dem Congressman for Palin e-mail hacking « Palinmania!
  10. The College Politico » Blog Archive » Palin hacker, Rubico, was on NewsBusters while taking pictures of her E-Mail
  11. David Kernell, Son Of Tennessee Democratic State Representative Mike Kernell, Indicted In Palin E-mail Hacking Case | Right Voices
  12. Palin E-mail Hacker Indicted
  13. Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection (95 Cases) « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  14. Michelle Malkin Judge rules Ohio Secretary of State violated federal election law; plus ACORN victim on tape | OBAMA ACORN
  15. Tel-Chai Nation
  16. It’s the 1960’s all over again. « Chockblock’s blog
  17. Joe under fire; A sign of things to come « Northern Thoughts And Reflections

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #491051
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:26 am, rommsey said:

    Good, I too hope he serves every day of it.

  2. #491054
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:26 am, sandyb said:

    Even if a lib judge decides his sentence, he’ll have to take into account the outrage he’d (the judge) would receive from a light or non-existent sentence. Even commies and other terrorists want their privacy…Can’t wait to hear how the libs spin this.

  3. #491055
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:26 am, ConMom said:

    Some excellent news for the day! We need it!

  4. #491057
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:28 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Good news indeed.

  5. #491059
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:28 am, BobonStatenIsland said:

    He’ll get a slap on the wrist and serve no time. Five years probation. He’ll probably cop a plea.

  6. #491060
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:28 am, babbledabble said:

    Democrat’s son?!?! Nah, he’ll get off with a slap on the wrist. It would be a firing squad if some Republican’s kid hacked into Obama’s email.

  7. #491062
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:28 am, Ron Rockstar said:

    Brushy Mountain Prison is not a nice place, however; I doubt he will spend one day in prison. He is the son of a democratic state representative. They will probably end up buying him a new skate board to keep him out of trouble.

  8. #491063
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:28 am, ErinF said:

    This is simply a sign of things to come. Under an Obamination Administration, no conservative will be safe.

    Has anyone here seen pics of this turd? He looks like something Peter Brady threw up.

    If McCain doesn’t at least make some kind of statement of disdain on this, naming names of the turd and the turd’s dem father, then McCain will stand for nothing.

  9. #491067
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:29 am, sonofdy said:

    I am suprised he was even indicted.

  10. #491068
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:30 am, wighttrasch said:

    Well. He must have been wearing white after Labor Day too.

  11. #491070
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:30 am, jsr said:

    This indictment is further evidence that the Black Night of Bush Facism has taken over the country.

    /sarc off

  12. #491072
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:31 am, MarcoPolo said:

    What a dumb arse.

  13. #491075
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:32 am, brushman said:

    He’s probably on His Most High Obamaship’s list of pardons to be granted on 01/20/09, along with Tony Rezko.

  14. #491078
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:33 am, Flyoverman said:

    I wonder when he will be a guest on “Countdown” and “The View?”

  15. #491083
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:35 am, opus said:

    This will barely be mentioned in the MSM if at all.
    Nothing more will happen until long after the election and unlike everybody else it seems, I don’t think he’ll get more than a slap on the wrist. The only way he’ll do jail time is if there’s manadatory sentencing for the charge.
    How much of the general public remembers or even knows about the tires that were slashed on republican vehicles by the son/sons of democrat politicians during the last election?
    Better yet how much of the general public remembers or knows about the numerous cases of voter fraud by the democrats during the last election?

  16. #491084
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:36 am, Craig said:

    Kernell faces five years in prison.

    He can look at the bright side…he gets a new boyfriend.

  17. #491085
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:37 am, TiminPhx said:

    Consider this.

    And it’s only from a political viewpoint, knowing sadly that the great Unwashed Undecideds can decide who will win.

    But if Governor Palin was to make a statement to the fact, that she would accept an apology, a promise not to do it again, some communinity service (you know, a criminal being a community organizer), she would be ok with him being given a second chance.

    Look, I would fly him to Singapore to get some cane justice if it were up to me, but how would it play with the Undecideds?

  18. #491087
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:37 am, IndependentTom said:

    I must add my agreement to some of the previous posts.

    NOTHING will happen to this kid.

    If he even gets probation I’ll be surprised.

    The state takes care of it’s own.

  19. #491089
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:39 am, sandyb said:

    If McCain doesn’t at least make some kind of statement of disdain on this, naming names of the turd and the turd’s dem father, then McCain will stand for nothing.

    You mean less than he already does? He can’t even bring himself to say the names of his Dhimmi buddies responsible for this country’s worst meltdown since the Great Depression. He doesn’t care about Sarah. He’s just using her to “shore up the base.”

    She should refuse to be part of his sham campaign and wash off all the disgusting socialist cooties that may have tried to hitch a ride on her on the “Straight Talk Express.” (choke, choke)

  20. #491100
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:41 am, Paul Revere said:

    A University of Tennessee student who is the son of a Memphis legislator has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of hacking Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin’s personal e-mail.

    Uh…what’s missing?

  21. #491101
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:41 am, oldcollegeguy1980 said:

    I smell a plea deal…..

  22. #491102
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:43 am, Goldwater Knight said:

    He’ll get a slap on the wrist.

  23. #491104
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:44 am, Goldwater Knight said:

    It’ll be more of a financial burden on the father/mother than the “kid.”

  24. #491109
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:46 am, changer1701 said:

    I’ve noticed in the news stories on this that they say his father is a state legislator…no mention that he’s a DEMOCRAT state legislator. Big surprise…

  25. #491110
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:48 am, b-cat said:

    Nothing will happen other than a momentary embarrassment. He’ll say he’s sorry and that will be that. His dad’s a politician for heaven’s sake. He’ll owe the judge one, maybe.

  26. #491112
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:48 am, basuraboi3 said:

    Someone broke into my account once. I wonder if I can get them indicted.

  27. #491124
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:52 am, ajmontana said:

    Can we get the latest OJ jury to fry this piece of trash?
    if he indeed gets a slap, then what’s the point? I’ve had it with all the scams and lawbreakers in this Country getting away with everything. Time for it to stop, past time.

  28. #491128
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:53 am, seveneleventy said:

    He’ll be considered a hero and asked to appear on every msm morning show.

  29. #491134
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:57 am, sierra.caddis said:

    He sure gotta purdy mouth, don’t he?

  30. #491136
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:57 am, b-cat said:

    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:53 am, seveneleventy said:
    He’ll be considered a hero and asked to appear on every msm morning show.

    You are so right. He will be exalted, not punished.

  31. #491138
    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:58 am, BlameAmericaLast said:

    How long until Daddy gets him out of this? After all, he is a Democrat, remember?

  32. #491145
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:00 am, b-cat said:

    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:58 am, BlameAmericaLast said:
    How long until Daddy gets him out of this?

    If I had to guess, I’d say its already being worked on.

  33. #491146
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:01 am, Goldwater Knight said:

    Michelle not sure if you care but you spelled it e-mal.

  34. #491152
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:03 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    I pray daily in the name of Jesus Christ for corruption to be Exposed, Prosecuted, Convicted, and Prevented.

    In this particular case, we’re just beginning the “Prosecuted” phase.

    He knew exactly what he was doing, and what the risks were. To go easy on him would send the wrong message and only serve to encourage other political hackers. He needs to serve the full five years in prison.

    Don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time

  35. #491153
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:03 am, BobonStatenIsland said:

    I would like to know if his daddy knew about this. Kid’s emails might shed some light on that. If so, then ere will be some trouble (for his dad). Otherwise, nothing happens. He’ll be told not to go near a computer for a while, as if that is even enforcible.

  36. #491159
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:08 am, seveneleventy said:

    He knew exactly what he was doing, and what the risks were. To go easy on him would send the wrong message and only serve to encourage other political hackers. He needs to serve the full five years in prison.

    Be prepared to be disappointed!

  37. #491160
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:08 am, evilned said:

    On January 20th 2009 at 2:06PM EST David Kernell is granted a full pardon by President Barack Obama and given a hearty “well done!”

  38. #491161
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:08 am, nyc123me said:

    No more internet for you, it’s back to the playstation!

  39. #491162
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:09 am, b-cat said:

    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:03 am, BobonStatenIsland said:
    I would like to know if his daddy knew about this. Kid’s emails might shed some light on that. If so, then ere will be some trouble (for his dad).

    His dad will be in no trouble even if it were his idea. He’s a dem. The MSM will hush this up and sweep it under the rug, and he will be reelected. Now if he were Republican, it would be front page story everywhere.

    Remember William Jefferson? Or any Kennedy?

  40. #491173
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:16 am, BobonStatenIsland said:

    Hey b-cat, even dems sometime fall…..look at Elliot Spitzer (O.K., he had enemies within his own party). You never know. Not that I have any hope. My mom used to tell me, “If you want justice, don’t go to the Justice System.”

  41. #491178
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:19 am, b-cat said:

    Yeah Bob, dems do sometimes fall, but I’m not that hopeful that it will. Seen it too many times. But I am willing to be surprised by events in this case. :P

  42. #491180
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:21 am, FamilyMan said:

    It’s time to write the court and demand that this kid get the maximum sentence. Make an example of him. The courts say public opinion dosn’t influence them.
    IT DOES.

  43. #491182
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:22 am, pianoman said:

    WHO is the “one other individual”?

  44. #491184
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:22 am, flaming_o said:

    No more internet for you, it’s back to the playstation!

    If the brilliant and whip-smart Mr. Kernell goes to federal prison, he will be the playstation (in the age of Obama).

  45. #491186
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:24 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On October 8th, 2008 at 10:36 am, Craig said:

    Kernell faces five years in prison.

    He can look at the bright side…he gets a new boyfriend.

    He’ll feel pretty, so pretty, so pretty-witty and wise.

    AmericanMe:
    Shut up B and take it like a man :-(


    ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS
    Should be a convenience store
    NOT a Government Agency
    Have the T-shirt
    Know it is true

  46. #491229
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:44 am, hatfield said:

    I didn’t think that you were allowed to indict a democrat.

  47. #491230
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:45 am, TheOtherSide said:

    Now if we can just make Sarah Palin accountable for doing government business via Yahoo mail. Seriously, could this have happened if she were using the far more secure e-mail system supplied to her by the state?

  48. #491234
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:47 am, Ilovemycountry said:

    If this is the best news you people get?

  49. #491242
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:53 am, scrubjay said:

    I think that there was one person who when into the email account to change the password away from “popcorn” so that no one else could access the email account. I hope that he is not indicted. He was the good guy in this situation.

  50. #491244
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:56 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:45 am, TheOtherSide said:

    Now if we can just make Sarah Palin accountable for doing government business via Yahoo mail. Seriously, could this have happened if she were using the far more secure e-mail system supplied to her by the state?

    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:47 am, Ilovemycountry said:

    If this is the best news you people get?

    I use strychnine on gophers and moles. Will that work on trolls also? I could put it in their Kool-Aid :-)
    These silver bullets are expensive.

    ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS
    Should be a convenience store
    NOT a Government Agency
    Have the T-shirt
    Know it is true

  51. #491252
    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:58 am, FamilyMan said:

    TheOtherSide
    You wouldn’t know what responsibility was if it slapped you in your socialist manifesto.

  52. #491257
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:00 pm, FamilyMan said:

    ArizonaNeanderthal said:These silver bullets are expensive.

    I was thinking wooden stake through the heart.

  53. #491264
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:03 pm, calamityville said:

    Hey country. This is not the best news we can get. But it is damn good.

  54. #491269
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:05 pm, tre said:

    A liberals first lesson in personal responsibility.

    That’s an alien concept to them.

  55. #491270
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:05 pm, Feelitmon said:

    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:53 am, scrubjay said:
    I think that there was one person who when into the email account to change the password away from “popcorn” so that no one else could access the email account. I hope that he is not indicted. He was the good guy in this situation.

    I was thinking the same thing, Scrubjay. That “white knight” deserves praise, not punishment. If I remember the story correctly though, several other /b/-tards accessed Palin’s account before that person changed the password and got word to her about what had happened.

  56. #491278
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:10 pm, FamilyMan said:

    It looks as if the libs on this thread are all for lawless intrusion into private lives.
    STRANGE

  57. #491282
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:12 pm, flaming_o said:

    the far more secure e-mail system supplied to her by the state

    ???

    Sez who? Network security brought to you by the paper-pushers who run your local DMV. Right.

  58. #491288
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:17 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    As usual, ABCNews.com, in reporting this incident fails to mention anywhere in the article that this was the son of a DEMOCRAT lawmaker. How typical. Covering up for the Dems…

    Here’s the “story”:

    Anything to help the Dems and Barack!

  59. #491295
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:24 pm, jdubya said:

    If convicted, he will learn the hard way what C:### means!

    Ha Ha!

  60. #491299
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:28 pm, dominigan said:

    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:45 am, TheOtherSide said:

    Now if we can just make Sarah Palin accountable for doing government business via Yahoo mail. Seriously, could this have happened if she were using the far more secure e-mail system supplied to her by the state?

    I’m trying to decide if you’re an idiot, a troll, or just someone who refuses to read the article.

    It was her PRIVATE, PERSONAL email that was hacked. She wasn’t doing any business over it. She was corresponding with friends and family.

    In fact, you’d probably be shouting if it were what you’re suggesting… If she was using State infrastructure to conduct personal business.

    So give it a rest, come up from your parent’s basement and get some fresh air. All that glue sniffing is affecting your judgment.

  61. #491301
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:31 pm, TheOtherSide said:

    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:12 pm, flaming_o said:
    the far more secure e-mail system supplied to her by the state
    ???

    Sez who? Network security brought to you by the paper-pushers who run your local DMV. Right.

    Was her government address hacked? So you are fine with her using a Yahoo email account to conduct government business? I guess, as a taxpayer, you don’t care about public records and transparency in what our government does.

  62. #491304
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:32 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:01 am, Goldwater Knight said:
    Michelle not sure if you care but you spelled it e-mal.

    That’s because when e-mail is used by a malcontent for malicious purposes, it’s known as e-mal. :)

  63. #491308
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:36 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:47 am, Ilovemycountry said:
    If this is the best news you people get?

    Until we get news that Obama is being investigated for his close ties with a known domestic terrorist, and receiving illegal campaign contributions from Fanny Mae, and encouraging voter fraud via ACORN, then yeah, this will have to suffice.

  64. #491314
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:40 pm, pianoman said:

    On October 8th, 2008 at 11:47 am, Ilovemycountry said:

    If this is the best news you people get? (emphasis mine)

    As diverse as opinions get on this board, we are ALL Americans, even the severely misguided.

    That phrase is very divisive by definition. In my opinion, so is your inappropriate handle.

  65. #491318
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, TheOtherSide said:

    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:28 pm, dominigan said:

    It was her PRIVATE, PERSONAL email that was hacked. She wasn’t doing any business over it. She was corresponding with friends and family

    “Hackers broke into the Yahoo! e-mail account that Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin used for official business as Alaska’s governor” (Washington Times)

    “Palin routinely uses a private Yahoo e-mail account to conduct state business.” (Juneau Empire)

  66. #491319
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    So you are fine with her using a Yahoo email account to conduct government business?

    Well, judging from what the criminal hacker posted online, I don’t consider photos of family, and emails to her friends, exposing other family members’ email addresses, and private cell phone number for her daughter had anything to do with government affairs or business. Do you?

    And in the gloating public comments of this (stupid) criminal that he was upset he didn’t find a smoking gun says it all in the end.

  67. #491326
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:45 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    TheOtherSide

    Can we make Obama accountable for the stark and blatant alliance he had with Bill Ayers for so many years? You know, your hero.

  68. #491327
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:46 pm, pianoman said:

    David Kernell and Sarah Palin.

    One broke the law, the other was a victim.

    No comparisons or redirections necessary.

    Case closed.

  69. #491330
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:47 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    Yahoo email use vs. a long and intimate alliance with a deranged terrorist. Hmmm.

  70. #491333
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:47 pm, Brian72 said:

    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:31 pm, TheOtherSide said:

    Was her government address hacked? So you are fine with her using a Yahoo email account to conduct government business? I guess, as a taxpayer, you don’t care about public records and transparency in what our government does.

    This is what you refuse to acknowledge, moron. The contents of that e-mail account were exposed to the world. All that was in there were personal messages and photos from family and friends. Some of the friends were state employees as well, but those messages were of a personal nature. Do you not believe that if there were State business in there to hide from an investigation, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE TOP NEWS STORY FOR DAYS ON END. IT WAS NOT.

    I’m glad to know that you justify raping of one’s privacy for political reasons. What was your position on listening to phone calls between overseas terrorists and individuals inside the USA again?

  71. #491334
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:48 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    Of course Otherside this forces you to defens Ayers and I’ll just wait and laugh my ass off at your rebuttal. Of course you feel Palin should be jailed for using yahoo.

  72. #491341
    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:52 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    You know, if the tables were turned, I’d love to see the moral equivalency thinking here.

    What if Barack’s personal email account was hacked into? And all of his personal family photos, email addresses of other people in his circle, private cell phone numbers of his daughters, etc., were all exposed and gloated over?

    There would be congressional hearings on the matter the next day. There would be page one, above the fold stories on it every single day…associating the incident somehow with McCain.

    Just imagine that.

  73. #491351
    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:00 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    That’s because when e-mail is used by a malcontent for malicious purposes, it’s known as e-mal.

    No kidding; thanks.

  74. #491357
    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:03 pm, flaming_o said:

    Was her government address hacked?

    Well, no. Gee willakers! The “far more secure e-mail system supplied to her by the state” had to have been far more user-friendly than any commercial product; had to have been developed using “recent” technology and not (for example) based on Windows 95; had to have been a productivity tool that actually allowed the governor’s office to get work done with some efficiency. Otherwise, why would she set herself up to be targeted by a lunatic fringe bent on doing any cruel, viscious, criminal thing it can to ruin her personal and her professional life? I don’t know. Maybe she’s a Republican. That might explain why she’s so stupid. Right?

    Right?

    p.s. Don’t waste any more of my time. We’ll meet again on election day.

  75. #491358
    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:05 pm, Kevin from Ohio in Virginia said:

    Salt,

    I referenced a story at breitbart.com on my post from the earlier story. That’s where my information comes from. You are correct, again as far as my understanding of the story goes, that Gov. Palin did not send official correspondence with this account. This does not make it OK, though. It just makes it not quite as dumb a mistake.

    I’d still vote for her. She’s just one of those individuals in between my generation and my parents’ generation who needs to get a clue about how to use a computer safely.

    I hope this “hacker,” who isn’t smart enough to deserve such a moniker, spends every day of the five years in the clink. We all know he won’t, though.

  76. #491360
    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:08 pm, EWTHeckman said:

    I think many of you are right. This kid won’t get much more than a stern talking to from his father:

    “Son, I’m extremely disappointed in you. How could you do such a thing? You’ve brought shame on our family with your exploits. I thought I had raised you better than this! You got indicted and you didn’t even manage to dig up or create anything substantial against the evil Rethuglicans! How could you be so sloppy?!? Next time, don’t get caught!

  77. #491364
    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:10 pm, TheOtherSide said:

    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:47 pm, Brian72 said:

    This is what you refuse to acknowledge, moron. The contents of that e-mail account were exposed to the world. All that was in there were personal messages and photos from family and friends.

    How come these were in her mail then?

    Meghan Stapleton
    Attachments
    FW: Motor Fuel Tax Suspension
    Sat, 8/30/08 1169KB
    Read

    Ruaro, Randall P (GOV)
    Draft letter to Governor Schwarzenegger / Container Tax
    Thu, 8/28/08 12KB
    Read

    Nizich, Michael A (GOV)
    RE: Using Royalty Oil to Lower the Cost of Fuel for Alaskans
    Fri, 8/22/08 42KB
    Read

    Ruaro, Randall P (GOV)
    Court of Appeals / Executive Director Parole Board / Boards and Commissions
    Thu, 8/21/08 10KB
    Unread

    McAllister, William D (GOV)
    Re: DPS Personnel and Budget Issues
    Wed, 8/20/08 12KB
    Read

  78. #491366
    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:13 pm, md1964 said:

    Well he hopes Obama is elected president.. he will get a presidential pardon, about 12 seconds after Obama gives one to his sugar daddy Rezko’s.

  79. #491373
    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:18 pm, Brian72 said:

    As an aside, I don’t believe that “government business” was all that was hoped for in this e-mail.

    All of the liberals were hoping for a personal scandal, like dirty Foley-type sexual messages between her and Todd, or better yet someone who isn’t Todd. Maybe some whip-and-chain pictures, or evidence of an affair. References to her daughter’s relationship, “shotgun marriage”, things like that.

    These scumbags wanted to destroy her appeal to the religious right, and depress enthusiasm on election day. It’s not that difficult to imagine.

    There was much more than some investigation, or the “people’s right to know”. They all wanted to “tabloidize” her, as revenge for those Paris Hilton ads that seemed to work.

    Well, we can say epic fail on that one.

    Sarah is what they hoped she was only pretending to be: a decent, honest person who cares about her co-workers, and has many close friends who love her. Now she has many, many more friends who love her dearly than when this account was hacked into.

    Liberals are desperate for the “hypocrisy card”, as always.

  80. #491374
    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:19 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    OK, our reps are looting us for trillions and this kid is going to prison…(not that he shouldn’t)…when is Jamie Gorelick going to prison?

  81. #491377
    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:22 pm, Brian72 said:

    Where is the scandal? Where are the headlines? Why did this not do what you wanted it to do? What is illegal about any of this on Sarah’s part?

    YOU’VE GOT NOTHING.

    If it was something, and YOU have it, don’t you think someone who’s much more capable of doing something with this than you would have used it against her by now?

  82. #491379
    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:26 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    In the end what’s pathetic is that most liberals think it’s OK to expose someone’s email regardless if it was an illegal act to get it in the first place. It doesn’t matter what the content was. It was a crime. What part of CRIME do you not get?

    Remember, by any means necessary is the Democrat motto here.

    Until it happens to them. Then they’ll be crying foul.

    Hypocrites.

  83. #491393
    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:35 pm, TheOtherSide said:

    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:26 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:
    In the end what’s pathetic is that most liberals think it’s OK to expose someone’s email regardless if it was an illegal act to get it in the first place.

    Could you please site some references to liberals condoning the illegal act of the hacker.

    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:18 pm, Brian72 said:

    All of the liberals were hoping for a personal scandal

    And conservatives would never stop to that level?

    What is illegal about any of this on Sarah’s part?

    I doubt there was anything illegal about this, however as I stated above, it sets a very dangerous precedent. Don’t you want to know what your government is doing? By using personal email government can circumvent public record.

  84. #491394
    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:39 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Could you please site some references to liberals condoning the illegal act of the hacker.

    Saying NOTHING is just as bad. Where was Obama? Did he condemn it? Did any of his minions condemn it? Did any Democrat condemn it?

    No, it fell on deaf ears. Some were probably gloating over it.

  85. #491403
    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:46 pm, Brian72 said:

    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:35 pm, TheOtherSide said:

    I doubt there was anything illegal about this, however as I stated above, it sets a very dangerous precedent. Don’t you want to know what your government is doing? By using personal email government can circumvent public record.

    Oh yes. It’s not the evidence, it’s the seriousness of the charge!

    Are you sure that those e-mails constitute “official state business”? Suggestions about what to look at or what may come up, hey check this out, what do you think of this. Is that really “official”? I think not, or else this so-called scandal would be everywhere, all the time.

    You are grasping at straws. There is nothing there, and the Democrat’s son is the one who broke the law, not the Governor. Sorry you are so disappointed.

  86. #491404
    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:47 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On October 8th, 2008 at 12:10 pm, FamilyMan said:

    It looks as if the libs on this thread are all for lawless intrusion into private lives.
    STRANGE

    Private lives as with private property are not conducive to the Collective. Be it Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro, Obamanites, Ilovemycountry or his evil twins such as TheOtherSide. How is that Kool-Aid?

    ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS
    Should be a convenience store
    NOT a Government Agency
    Have the T-shirt
    Know it is true

  87. #491414
    On October 8th, 2008 at 1:54 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I guess we’ll never know if Barack uses his personal email for official business…since no one has hacked into his account.

    Being such an honest person he is and all that.

  88. #491433
    On October 8th, 2008 at 2:03 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    Could you please site some references to liberals condoning the illegal act of the hacker.

    You’re such a clown. LOL!

  89. #491454
    On October 8th, 2008 at 2:13 pm, mattm said:

    I hope he gets to serve all five years. On the bright side, prison is kinda like a dorm, excpet the guard tells you when you can leave your two person room and you have your self a “buddy” to shower with.

  90. #491455
    On October 8th, 2008 at 2:14 pm, pianoman said:

    Don’t you want to know what your government is doing? By using personal email government can circumvent public record.

    How’s that? Apparently, personal email is so insecure that it can be hacked by any hillbilly Gates wannabe. So you would want items such as, say, troop movements or anti-terrorist tactics sent over Yahoo or Hotmail or Gmail?
    Can you please make up your mind what you are really indignant about?

    Oh…never mind.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The indelible whiteness of MSNBC

November 23, 2009 05:07 AM by Michelle Malkin

107 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Palin-bashers of pallor.

Who’s afraid of conservative American women?

November 16, 2009 11:17 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“Extreme” in a skirt.

Sarah Palin: “Going Rogue”

September 28, 2009 05:52 PM by Michelle Malkin

96 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

Letterman’s half-assed apology; Update: Palin accepts

June 15, 2009 11:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

149 Comments | 25 Trackbacks

Bad joke.

David Letterman: Perv

June 12, 2009 04:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

766 Comments | 61 Trackbacks

Why they hate us

June 11, 2009 11:42 AM by Michelle Malkin

195 Comments | 25 Trackbacks


Categories: Sarah Palin



Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook