Obama, the socialist New Party, and the socialist Bush Treasury Department
There’s a lot of blog buzz over Barack Obama’s membership in the socialist New Party. You can read about it here, here, and here.
A year ago, I might have gotten as worked up about this as everyone else seems to be.
But after watching a GOP White House and Republican collaborationists fork over billions upon billions in socialist aid to private businesses, presiding over the most massive nationalization efforts I’ve seen in my lifetime over the past year — and then watching John McCain pitch his Treasury Department-as-national loan servicer plan during the debate — it’s hard for me to muster up much more angst than I already have.
Read today’s headline, people: U.S. May Take Ownership Stake in Banks:
Having tried without success to unlock frozen credit markets, the Treasury Department is considering taking ownership stakes in many United States banks to try to restore confidence in the financial system, according to government officials.
Treasury officials say the just-passed $700 billion bailout bill gives them the authority to inject cash directly into banks that request it. Such a move would quickly strengthen banks’ balance sheets and, officials hope, persuade them to resume lending. In return, the law gives the Treasury the right to take ownership positions in banks, including healthy ones.
The Treasury plan was still preliminary and it was unclear how the process would work, but it appeared that it would be voluntary for banks.
The proposal resembles one announced on Wednesday in Britain. Under that plan, the British government would offer banks like the Royal Bank of Scotland, Barclays and HSBC Holdings up to $87 billion to shore up their capital in exchange for preference shares. It also would provide a guarantee of about $430 billion to help banks refinance debt.
The American recapitalization plan, officials say, has emerged as one of the most favored new options being discussed in Washington and on Wall Street. The appeal is that it would directly address the worries that banks have about lending to one another and to other customers.
This new interest in direct investment in banks comes after yet another tumultuous day in which the Federal Reserve and five other central banks marshaled their combined firepower to cut interest rates but failed to stanch the global financial panic.
In a coordinated action, the central banks reduced their benchmark interest rates by one-half percentage point. On top of that, the Bank of England announced its plan to nationalize part of the British banking system and devote almost $500 billion to guarantee financial transactions between banks.
Socialism is here and now.
***
J H Lee agrees.
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
- When Are You Going To Get? « The Reluctant Optimist
- D.C. socialists versus technology « Take Your Cross
- Conservatism Failing (Republican Moderates & Elites Sell Out) « Zipline Conservative
- The Hunt for Red Obama « Above My Pay Grade!
- Obama’s Ties to Radical, ACORN-Allied ‘New Party’ in Illinois : Ft. Hard Knox
- Obama’s Ties to Radical, ACORN-Allied ‘New Party’ in Illinois « Green Country Values
- Obama was a Member of Socialistic "New Party" | The Daily Conservative
- Obama’s Socialist Party Membership « Truthseeker
- Damn… «
- PAXALLES
- Lampstand Christian Forum Community
- Obama, the socialist New Party, and the socialist Bush Treasury Department « Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian
- Don’t let the psy-ops throw you - UPDATED | The Anchoress
- Ché Guevara executed 41 years ago today « The Right Daily
- Seymour Nuts » Blog Archive » The Dow Continues to Drop
- Huffington Post - “A Young Black Man Was Sent By God” | BigMouthFrog
- Lump on a Blog » Blog Archive » A Real Opportunity for McCain
- The Other McCain: 'Socialists taking over our country'
- End Times | NeoConstant
- Governments Grasping at Straws | Hennessy's View
- U.s.s.a? - Lampstand Christian Forum Community
- Michelle Malkin » AIG uses my money to tell me how taking more of my money is good for me
- Ban Bailouts–Stop Inflation Now (SIN)–Stop Socialism of Losses! « Pronk Palisades
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Subprime crisis
Mudville Gazette
» The five-year plan
Stop The ACLU
» SEALs Charged With Assault for Arresting Top Terrorist
Legal Insurrection
» Is "Finish the Job" the New "Peace With Honor"?
JustOneMinute
» Getting Ready For The Turkey
Riehl World View
» Uncle Jimbo Re-deploys In War With Allah
Sister Toldjah
» WaPo and NYT to Obama: We love ya, you stylish deep thinker
Pundit & Pundette
» Hiding the decline: Deniers made them do it
Weekly Standard
» GOP Opens up 7-Point Lead on Congressional Ballot, Obama Numbers Dive on Health Care, Gitmo, and KSM








Quite a read.
People, if there was ever a time to pay attention to the Congressional races, I’d say this is it. No matter who gets elected President, we need a “conservative” Congress to prevent the socialistic ideas of either Obama or McCain from becoming law and policy. We need a “conservative” Congress to prevent the nominations of life-time appointed Supreme Court judges who view the Constitution as a “living document” that can change at their behest. Bottom line: Can one imagine either Obama or McCain with a liberal Congress?