Did You Know...


Obama proposes 90-day foreclosure moratorium — against it before he was for it

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 13, 2008 04:40 PM

McCain wants to buy up individual mortgages and play loan servicer-in-chief for homeowners underwater. Obama wants to put a 90-day freeze on foreclosures and prolong the pain for short-term political gain.

Pander twin powers, activate:

Democrat Barack Obama proposed more immediate steps Monday to heal the nation’s ailing economy, including a 90-day moratorium on home foreclosures at some banks and a two-year tax break for businesses that create new jobs…

…Obama proposed Monday that banks participating in the federal bailout should temporarily postpone foreclosures for families making good-faith efforts to pay their mortgage.

“We need to give people the breathing room they need to get back on their feet,” he said, adding that families living beyond their means share some of the responsibility.

“Part of the reason this crisis occurred, if we’re honest with ourselves, is that everyone was living beyond their means — from Wall Street to Washington to even some on Main Street,” Obama said.

McCain opposes a temporary foreclosure moratorium and instead wants to focus on policies that would keep homeowners from ever facing foreclosure, said economic adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin.

Why stop at 90 days, Barry?

Your old friends at ACORN demand a one-year foreclosure moratorium.

Why not two years or three or five?

And hey, why stop at foreclosure moratoriums?

How about a rent moratorium for idiots like me who stayed out of the housing market and took a pass on indulging on an overpriced McMansion with no money down and an ARM?

All together now: Dude, where’s our bailout?


Hillary Clinton first proposed a foreclosure moratorium last January.

The White House followed suit a month later.

And now, Obama — who was against it before he was for it. Here’s what he said eight short months ago:

Clinton’s solution is a 90-day moratorium for foreclosures on sub-prime occupied homes, and a five-year rate freeze on sub-prime adjustable rate mortgages. The Bush administration has already responded with a 30-day cooling period on foreclosures; Clinton and her aides insist a longer freeze is essential for stabilizing a precarious situation for homeowners.

But according to some economists and officials grappling with the crisis, her proposal, which also offers a $30-billion foreclosure fund that is triple the size of Obama’s, might only prolong the agony for homeowners.

A 90-day freeze is fine for what it is, but what happens on the 91st day?” Rokakis asked. “Why not a year? Or longer?”

In San Antonio on Tuesday, Obama said that Clinton’s foreclosure freeze was potentially “disastrous,” rewarding “people who made this problem worse” by benefiting banks that profit from high mortgage rates.

A “blanket freeze,” Obama added, might “drive rates through the roof for those trying to buy or refinance. Experts say the value of homes will fall even more, and even more families could face foreclosure.”

God save us from bipartisanship.


Commenter AlohaGuy: “You forgot to mention Michelle, that Obama wants you to be able to borrow from your retirement account with no penalty, so eventually we can all bail out the people who spend their reitrement accounts of bad mortgages…There is no end to it.”

Standing up against wealth-shaming

January 29, 2014 02:57 AM by Michelle Malkin

Barack Obama’s “Social Innovation” slush fund

June 14, 2013 10:35 AM by Michelle Malkin

Scytl: Voter Fraud Facts and Fiction

May 9, 2012 07:59 AM by Michelle Malkin

Categories: 2012 Campaign, ACORN Watch, Politics, Voter fraud