Who’s responsible for the market roller coaster?

The Dow Jones Industrial average has plunged about 2,000 points since the House of Representatives passed bailout legislation on October 3rd. The market’s back up this morning, but the feds should resist patting themselves on the backs. Yale law professor Jonathan Macey argues that officials at the Federal Reserve, Securities and Exchange Commission and Treasury Department, are partly responsible for the market decline:
Despite all the hard work and good intentions on the part of our public officials, when economists and historians look back on the current financial crisis they are likely to conclude that government intervention prolonged and deepened it. In particular, officials at the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Treasury Department are to blame for publicly losing confidence in the very economic system they are supposed to protect.
The Fed, the Treasury and the SEC appear to be in a state of panic. A crisis mentality led the custodians of the U.S. capital markets publicly to jettison their lifelong commitments to the capital markets in favor of a series of short-term regulatory quick fixes. Even more troubling, for the past several months the doyens of U.S. fiscal and monetary policy have ignored the most fundamental principle of central banking, which is that the primary responsibility of central bankers is to promote stability and to maintain confidence in the capital markets. Our central bankers appear to have suddenly lost confidence both in their own abilities and in the standard tools of fiscal and monetary policy.
The original Treasury plan — which called for the transfer of virtually unlimited taxpayer dollars and unlimited spending discretion to Treasury with no judicial or congressional oversight — sent a very bad signal to the markets. Instead of restoring confidence, this approach to the crisis instilled more fear and panic in the markets.
It’s a sobering message for the Do Something Chicken Littles and spot on.
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Subprime crisis

TigerHawk
» The return of Pauline Kael

Riehl World View
» Define "Alternate Reality"
Stop The ACLU
» Even The Washington Post Sneers At Barry School Choice
Gateway Pundit
» Crackpot DA Pounds His Fist & Screams At Judge at Cheney Trial
NewsBusters.org
» Chicago Tribune: All Obama, All the Time
Right Wing Nut House
» WILL NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE KILL CONSERVATISM?
Redstate
» Obama: Billions for Pork Barrel Earmarks
Power Line
» Turkeys on parade

Pajamas Media
» Must Conservatives Rally Round the Messiah?




Time for chicken little soup.
a nice october surprise!! from the democrat shadow government. just like at the CIA, there is a cabal of democrats in the bureacracy, who have a great deal of influence…
Indeed. But let’s not limit that to just the market… the same could be said for the American taxpayer as well.
The only way to fix this is to cut taxes and spending to bare bones and I would gladly vote for that! Bush tells everyone to calm down and then in the next breath screams the sky is falling. People who believe anything those in the government say, deserve what they get. It’s time for a change but that doesn’t mean Obama!
I agree that the Feds aren’t really helping in this market collapse, but I also think that there is a fear in the market of an Obama Presidency and all the Socialism that that will bring with it cause the Market to be skittish.
Puleeze. A Yale law professor?????
This guy obviously doesn’t understand the markets.
GET.BACK.TO.BASICS!
Capitalist manifesto.
Isn’t it ironic that the economy is propelling Obama to the top right now, but the cure he offers just might also be the cause.
A lot of major banks around the world got stuck holding bad paper based on bad mortgages thanks to ACORN, FANNIE and FREDDIE. I don’t think they are in the mood to hear any assurances from the US Government. As far as who wins the election? It was Rothschild who said,”If I have control of the country’s bank, I care not who runs the government”.
you’re actually expecting people to think?? come on, democRAT voters are encouraged not to think, rather just feel…and Obama cares
no matter how bad things will get under obama, these stooges will follow him off the cliff..
We’ve reached the point where every year is treated like an election year by our various political groups. It has come to kneejerk politics to pander to whoever is whining or paying the most at any particular moment. This constant battle for power has removed any sense of long-term view.
The Bush tax cuts after 9/11 prove that the economy will respond positively to having to pay less taxes. Killing the capital gains tax and putting our bloated Federal Agencies on a strict diet would be a wonderful start. Just imagine how better off the economy and our personal lives would be without many of these bloated inept agencies.
Welcome to the United Socialist States of America! We’re boned!
As Rush says, “Ignorance is the most expensive commodity we have.” Too many people are ignorant of economics, even the most basic principles. They have bought into this class warfare nonsense (I’ve had to deprogram my husband from this one and it’s still a work in progress). It’s us vs. them (”the rich”) mentality.
Who’s responsible? … too many to list but most of them have a “D” behind their names … Frank, Dodd, Pelosi, Reid, etc. …
However … One name that many have forgotten through all this is good ole “Chucky” …
Don’t forget that the sudden interest in bank solvency began in April right after Schumer intentionally leaked to the press (MSM of course) his letter to the Fed about IndyMac Bank in California … (which it turned out was already under scrutiny and in the process of being taken over quietly by the Fed) … that is an action which happens multiple times every year and never makes the front pages of anything but a few business-investor sources …
Schumer putting all of this out caused a panic rush on IndyMac deposits and made certain that the bank fully failed rather than simply going into a Fed receivership … the aftermath caused many to start questioning their own banks solvency …
So … how about Schumer getting his share of the criticism? …
Don’t mean to be paranoid here, but there are enough bucks out there on the loony left, thinking of Soros et al, that they could quite easily manipulate the market with some strategic selling at the right time. I note that most of the really big moves are coming right at the close, making the day’s market look even worse than it was. It certainly wouldn’t be out of character, or even the first try for Soros to manipulate a market for his benefit.
Tons of market watchers, mortgage bankers and such have warned of the sub prime meltdown-they were warning of it during the white hot real estate market several years ago and have been warning about it all along.
The whole market was too hot–a fire feeding on it’s self. We have seen it before-but not this bad and not in my lifetime. NO ONE who could make a difference did much even though the White House, Congress and the regulatory agencies saw this coming.There were conservatives in the House and Senate who tried–but they were too few.The rest were too busy being busy. But they have theirs and government pensions. Barney Frank is not the only pimp in government.
Now I am going out to buy another safe.
God Bless America except for the blue states.
—
ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS
Should be a convenience store
NOT a Government Agency
Royal Bank of Scotland under state control
Sound familiar?
—
ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS
Should be a convenience store
NOT a Government Agency
Brings back history, to anyone who studies history… It is written by many ECONOMISTS, that the meddling by the FEDS, and mostly by FDR, PROLONGED the GREAT DEPRESSION by at least double…To quote the GREAT HISTORIAN, Yogi Berra… “It’s DEJA VU all over again.” There were many ECONOMISTS, and MARKET GURUS who wanted to slow down, and not RUSH to any plan… Just wait and see if you will… I wonder what those results would have been… AH but we will never know, will we???
And caused it, if you agree with this explanation from a lefty economist (a little long, but worth the read). Very compelling, IMHO.
I wonder when the speculators in oil futures, who are driving down prices due to expected lower demand, will get any credit?
Don’t listen to all of those people and institutions that falsely claim to have screwed up. Its all my fault and I take full responsibility.
Send me your money and I will fix it.
mmmm mmm.. Kaintuckky FRied Chickun Littls
got sauce?
plenty of blame to go all around, people do get greedy and do get caught.
.. and that’s just on the side full of reputable and respectable folk who had oversight all these years over these financial enterprises&institutions and did little more than pocket money “donated” from their cohorts in quasigubamintal ventures like the FMs Fannie and FReddy and get a god deal on a mortgage at Countrywide.
When hell freezes over.
Senator McCain is on FOX speaking in Virginia Beach.
He “HAS A PLAN”.
We are so nailed.
—
ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS
Should be a convenience store
NOT a Government Agency
I think this Yale prof is overestimating Bush’s influence. Few people pay him any attention anymore.
Who knows what our REAL economy trully is…we have so many Artificial applications, that it is almost like picking up a girl who is a spectacular looking “10″ but eventually you find out after the boob job, hair extensions, botox, half a pound of makeup and other “Enhancing Apparatuses” that you have a ugly 2 that needs all that to stand up.
pueblo1032 said:
Does anyone study history any more?/ sarc
The Federal Reserve deserves most of the blame. As they set the price of money they influence the risk tolerance of the financial institutions that receive that money. Capitalism runs on greed, but is balanced by fear, the Federal Reserve removes that fear with a loose monetary policy. Also, as the Federal Reserve is a private and unaccountable institution that makes a predetermined 10% profit a year, there is no way it can be counted on as ‘responsible’ or ‘impartial’.
Government intervention also can remove the fear balance in the market with ridiculous bailouts, agencies, programs, and implied government backstops. Although, these types of market interventions usually don’t have the same systemic risk as the monetary policy directed through our private central bank.
Krugman won the Nobel in Economics. Ask him.
Nobel is a partisan hack group.
Let’s see…. 535 people, mostly lawyers, think as a giant committee they can maange a cpaitalist economy.
Odds of their being successful?
See the Senate cafeteria for details.
One thing that the income redistribution morons fail to understand is that giving money to people who haven’t learned the skills necessary to earn money will simply waste the money given to them. Giving a mortgage to people who couldn’t afford it was irresponsible. Teaching poor people how to manage money would have been a better plan. Obama’s tax plan just gives out more money which will be spend poorly. He’s part of the problem, not the solution.
Big daddy gov buys stock in finicial institutions!
Social control? Is it legal for daddy gov to invest in the market?
Krugman the New York Times columist best known for bad mouthing Pesident Bush? Klugman who basically quoted Lester Thurow? That one?
I prefer: Milton Friedman (July 31, 1912 – November 16, 2006) was an American Nobel Laureate economist and public intellectual.He is the one that predicted the Socialist Push and expansion because of the fall of the Berlin Wall.
But then Yasir Arafat was a Nobel Laureate. We are not impressed.
—
ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS
Should be a convenience store
NOT a Government Agency
Reminds me of a Reagan quote:
Mr. Obama would consider officially opening combat positions to women.
That ought to help the economy. Well at least for the women left home. Fat gals could become pole dancers, ugly gals could get dates instead of being correspondents for PBS and the New York Times. Anyone care to follow Lieutenant Michelle Obama into combat?, Madonna, Paris Hilton–all the important ones. Botox Pelosi would command at least a brigade.
But as all will be peace and love under He Who Has Come there will no danger. Democrats never get us into war.
…and Al (excuse me while I throw up) Gore…
11% gain today.
Up and down and all around.
May God help us all.
This is exactly what I tried to intimate to my representative John Tierney who emailed me back a complete cock and bull story as to why he flipped his vote from nay to yea on the senate version. And it was his response to my email … thanking him for his nay vote!
I told him the TAIL IS WAGGING THE DOG.
Watching the market response to that initial house vote should have made it clear that investors DO NOT want more government!
Why don’t these morons ‘get it’??