“The comprehensive argument against Barack Obama”

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 21, 2008 01:04 PM

Spread the word.


Photoshop: IMAO

Posted in: Barack Obama

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. The Comprehensive Case Against Barack Obama | The American Pundit
  2. Health Care BS - THE FEAR WE NEED
  3. The comprehensive argument against Barack Obama | Right Voices
  4. Killer of American Dreams–Barack Obama–Radical Socialist–Video « Pronk Palisades
  5. “The comprehensive argument against Barack Obama” | PoliticsMuch.com
  6. “The comprehensive argument against Barack Obama” | PoliticsMuch.com
  7. The Case Against Senator Obama « Dianej’s Weblog
  8. skewred.com » McCain vs. Obama: Closing Argument
  9. southchild » Blog Archive » The comprehensive argument against Barack Obama
  10. Tuesday October 21, 2008 « Quipster
  11. BizzyBlog » At Hot Air: The comprehensive argument against Barack Obama
  12. Scott’s Obama Phone FAIL on Michelle Malkin « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  13. Barack Obama: Buying, Criming, and Lying His Way Through a Presidential Election is NOT “change we can believe in” at Haemet
  14. The comprehensive argument against Barack Obama | PoliticsMuch.com
  15. The comprehensive argument against Barack Obama | PoliticsMuch.com

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #508841
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:08 pm, wayiwalk said:

    Socialist!

  2. #508842
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:08 pm, katieanne said:

    Outstanding. I am scared, very scared at what Obama and his angry wife in the White House will mean. While I agree with those who say that Obama will be Jimmy Carter’s second term, it will be a much more dangerous situation.

  3. #508848
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:09 pm, wayiwalk said:

    And I left out “and a lamb ready for the slaughter by the washington wolves”

  4. #508849
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:10 pm, stevevvs said:

    He is horrible, he will destroy the country, period.
    Chuck Baldwin and the Constitution Party are our only hope at this time.
    Borders
    Language
    Culture
    Constitution
    Rule of Law
    No Amnesty
    Drill Everywhere.
    McCain Fails This Test as well.

  5. #508851
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:10 pm, Some Guy said:

    A new definition of “Epic Failure”!

  6. #508856
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:15 pm, stevevvs said:

    McCain-Feingold — the most brazen frontal assault on political speech since Buckley v. Valeo.

    McCain-Kennedy — the most far-reaching amnesty program in American history.

    McCain-Lieberman — the most onerous and intrusive attack on American industry — through reporting, regulating, and taxing authority of greenhouse gases — in American history.

    McCain-Kennedy-Edwards — the biggest boon to the trial bar since the tobacco settlement, under the rubric of a patients’ bill of rights.

    McCain-Reimportation of Drugs — a significant blow to pharmaceutical research and development, not to mention consumer safety (hey Rudy, pay attention, see link).

    And McCain’s stated opposition to the Bush 2001 and 2003 tax cuts was largely based on socialist, class-warfare rhetoric — tax cuts for the rich, not for the middle class. The public record is full of these statements. Today, he recalls only his insistence on accompanying spending cuts.

    As chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, McCain was consistently hostile to American enterprise, from media and pharmaceutical companies to technology and energy companies.

    McCain also led the Gang of 14, which prevented the Republican leadership in the Senate from mounting a rule change that would have ended the systematic use (actual and threatened) of the filibuster to prevent majority approval of judicial nominees.
    Mark R. Levin, who has somehow forgotten this!

  7. #508859
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:18 pm, stevevvs said:

    Yep, they are both a disaster. Chuck Baldwin IS the only hope we have, Sadly.

    Philip J. Berg, google it. He believes Obama was born in Kenya. He has a new news release today…

  8. #508860
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:19 pm, Hangfire said:

    Beware of false prophets. Like Obama.

  9. #508861
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:21 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    Yep, they are both a disaster. Chuck Baldwin IS the only hope we have, Sadly.

    And Baldwin is pretty nutty too.

    What the heck was the Constitution Party thinking when they had Alan Keyes available.

    KEYS/ROHRBOUGH ‘08

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  10. #508864
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:22 pm, Bear said:

    No wonder that so many govertment leaders throughout the World want Obama in the US White House. It will mean the end of the US as a First World Nation and a World Power.

  11. #508866
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:24 pm, max said:
  12. #508867
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:24 pm, Hangfire said:

    Alan Keyes. How can I be racist if I would vote for him? Or Thomas Sowell. Or J.C. Watts?

    Voting against Obama makes me a racist. I don’t get it.

  13. #508868
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:24 pm, stevevvs said:

    And Baldwin is pretty nutty too.

    What the heck was the Constitution Party thinking when they had Alan Keyes available.

    Keyes is a bit nutty in my opinion. Even the Libertarians did not want him!He lost to Obama too!

  14. #508872
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:27 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Too bad Baldwin won’t get even half as many votes as Bob Barr, who might get just enough votes to tip things from the slow boat to socialism (McCain) to the express train to communism, with same day voter registration/voting nationwide passed by a Dem super majority in Congress and signed by Obama ensuring the Dems will be able to win every election ever held again.

    Your vote to do as you please, if that is what consience demands, but you’re casting what may be a vote in the last free (well, if you ignore ACORN’s frauds that will be dwarfed in 2012 under Dem election supervision) election ever held in this country on a candidate that won’t get even an entire percentage point.

  15. #508873
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:28 pm, Rob said:

    Voting against Obama makes me a racist. I don’t get it.

    I no longer care if they like me or think I am a racist. If making decisions that I think are right and best for me and my country is going to get me called a racist by the very people I despise… then maybe RAAAACIST is a compliment.

  16. #508874
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:30 pm, b-cat said:

    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:27 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Hear, hear!

  17. #508875
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:31 pm, rambler said:

    Alan Keyes is part of the reason why Obama went to the senate in the first place.
    If Obama gets in, he will have to deliver what the left wants or he is toast. He doesn’t have the guts to be anything other than a puppet. All Obama supporters should be worried about the unintended consequences of having Clueless and Bitter in the White House.

  18. #508878
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:32 pm, Hangfire said:

    Here in Hawaii, Obama is the subject of so much adoration it borders on blasphemy.

  19. #508879
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:32 pm, John Deaux said:

    Baldwin/Keyes/Barr

    We have just as much chance of Reagan resurrecting as we do of any of those winning the election. Why not complain about how we were promised we’d have flying cars by 2000?

  20. #508880
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:32 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Beth Nudelman, who owned the fish, said Princess may have landed on a mailing list because the family once filled in the pet’s name when they got a second phone line for a computer.

    “There was no fraud involved,” said Nudelman, a Democrat who supports Barack Obama. “This person is a dead fish.”

    I’m afraid even dead goldfish are voting for Obama, but the military is 68% McCain.

    As for Baldwin being our only hope – you do know he won’t win don’t you? How is that hope and not delusion? No offense but the time to get your candidate into a winning position is gone in this election cycle. Either McCain or Obama will be elected President – that’s really. Between the two, who would you leave to your kids?

    (PS – I confess ignorance to Baldwin – who and what he stands for are immaterial in this election.)

  21. #508882
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:33 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    really = reality
    coffee…..

  22. #508884
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:34 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    “We do not have the military capacity, nor have we ever, quite frankly, in the last 20 years, to dictate outcomes,” he cautioned. “It’s so much more important than that. It’s so much more complicated than that. And Barack gets it.”

    No choice but pre-emptive surrender, is what he is saying. I think.

    Biden’s statement is another reason to stop Obama. He will be tested, and he will fail. Hugh Hewitt thinks Biden has gotten the intelligence briefings offered to both campaigns, and believes another Iranian war against Israel (whether through the proxy army Hezb’Allah or directly), and Obama will abandon Israel so as not to offend his foreign admirers in the Arab and Muslim world.

    Biden is telling Obama’s people they need to keep supporting Obama when he lets Israel get attacked without offering assistance.

    I think Hewitt is right.

  23. #508886
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:35 pm, sonofdy said:

    It will not take long for middle america to get buyers remorse if the one, our lord and savior, god emperor Obama then first (pbuh) gets fraudulently elected. Amen.

  24. #508894
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:38 pm, John Deaux said:

    Seems like McCain knows a little something about standing by allies. He turned down going home to stay and be tortured because others had been there longer.

    But hey, at least the dimwits have clear consciences. Who cares if Israel exists? At least Chuck Baldwin got 0.00001% of the vote! Go Third Party!

  25. #508898
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:39 pm, sonofdy said:

    Voting for a 3rd party in this election ensures an Obama victory. You can be as smug as you want paying huge taxes, claiming you didn’t vote for either, but you are still going to pay higher taxes.

  26. #508900
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:39 pm, lewisge said:

    Very good comprehensive analysis in the article. However, in their summation, I’m still not convinced Obama meets the constitutional minimum for the office.

  27. #508901
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:40 pm, sonofdy said:

    Chuck Baldwin is a ron paul wannabe.

  28. #508904
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:42 pm, cheapseat said:

    don’t you wonder what obama will do when iran and israel start warring over the skies of iraq and jordan and saudi arabia. CAN’T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG.

  29. #508909
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:45 pm, John Deaux said:

    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:42 pm, cheapseat said:
    don’t you wonder what obama will do when iran and israel start warring over the skies of iraq and jordan and saudi arabia. CAN’T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG.

    He’ll go in front of the U.N. Security Council and build a coalition of peace intimidating Iran into surrender using witty rhetoric backed up by harsh language.

  30. #508912
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:45 pm, cicerokid said:
  31. #508914
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:47 pm, rooster said:

    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:39 pm, lewisge said:
    Very good comprehensive analysis in the article. However, in their summation, I’m still not convinced Obama meets the constitutional minimum for the office.

    Exactly! Why is the lawsuit on his citizenship so silent???

  32. #508915
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:48 pm, cicerokid said:

    Sorry, bad link.
    a man who has few real credentials for the office he seeks beyond the Constitutional minimum, and a politician who has succeeded in obfuscating his hard-Left ideology.

    I am not sure that even this is accurate.

  33. #508917
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:49 pm, Mister P said:

    Well done, except that Obama is not black.

  34. #508926
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:55 pm, ThatSamIAm said:

    The word is out on Obama. Anyone that wants to know who and what he is politically can easily find out. He is a socialist liberal democrat hell bent on turning this country into a giant wellfare program. He is determined to raise taxes on anything that moves. He is a lock to make abortion a permanent scar on this country. He will surrender and appease our enemies while blaming this country at every turn.

    If he gets elected it will be because the American people no longer care what happens in this country. It will mean they willingly accept the death of our way of life. That’s a disturbing thought.

  35. #508931
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:57 pm, John Deaux said:

    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:55 pm, ThatSamIAm said:
    If he gets elected it will be because the American people no longer care what happens in this country.

    How many times have you heard people say that it doesn’t matter who we elect, they’re all the same?

    Quite often that’s true, but this time, they’re really, really wrong.

  36. #508933
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:59 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    I think Hewitt is right.

    Hewitt has been so consistently wrong on just about every issue/prediction that he’s almost bordering William Kristol on the dipsh*t scale. There is intelligence of an international crisis brewing, not only has Biden made light of it, but so has Powell and Lieberman. The question is what does this country do when it happens? Most likely Iran or Russia could trigger this event militarily, or China financially. Can this country afford in terms of blood and treasure another conflict? Can it afford a standoff with its biggest creditors? Hewitt thinks so, and if he’s saying we can, that means we really can’t. In Hugh’s defense though, he is a worthless sack of crap.

  37. #508934
    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:59 pm, jjmurphy said:

    All of these arguments and facts have been out there for months. Even if not covered by the MSM they were still reachable to anyone with even a half-hearted desire to learn about Obama and where he stands on the issues.

    ThatSamIAm – Darn it you got your post in just as I was writing this. Good points!

    The American people are being judged by the world in this election. As much as the elites of the world may hate us I think they secretly hope McCain wins. Maybe they realize that if Obama wins their safe little ivory towers won’t be so safe anymore.

  38. #508941
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:01 pm, cicerokid said:
  39. #508942
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:02 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    Voting for a 3rd party in this election ensures an Obama victory. You can be as smug as you want paying huge taxes, claiming you didn’t vote for either, but you are still going to pay higher taxes.

    We’ll be paying higher taxes no matter what. There’s no logical way to continue with (soon-to-be) trillion dollar yearly deficits without raising taxes substantially or resorting to hyper-inflation. The question is, would you rather have a Democrat or Republican be the one to do it?

  40. #508949
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:08 pm, Paul Revere said:

    OMG…check out this cartoon. Yes, he totally went there on Powell. :-D

  41. #508950
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:08 pm, bengals9 said:

    Those who think that the effects of an Obama presidency are not long-lasting need to remember that there are three Supreme Court Justices who will likely turn in their resignation letters on January 21st so that we can have three more Ruth Bader Ginsburgs on the highest Court in the land.

    This will affect us all for a generation.

  42. #508953
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:09 pm, bengals9 said:

    Talk about EPIC FAIL.

  43. #508955
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:11 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    #36

    OK, so Biden is right, there will be some kind of international crisis, and while we don’t like it, Obama sending Sec’ty of State Kerry to the UN for a strongly worded resolution but no concrete steps is precisely the right thing to do.

    And once Russia/Iran/China realize they can just roll on Israel, because Obama does nothing, they’ll invade, maybe Taiwan. Maybe South Korea. And Obama will do nothing. And he’ll be right.

    Maybe Georgia next? Ukraine? Poland?

    Japan? A Chavez led ‘Bolivarian coalition’ of South and Latin America into Mexico?

    Or, we elect the guy that spooks the bad guys a bit, McCain, and maybe they don’t even try.

    Either way, you’ll be one of a couple of thousand voters in your state (if it is a big state) that votes for the Constitution Party, and you can stand back and pat yourself on the back no matter who wins if things go to crap, because you didn’t vote for either candidate that had a chance to win.

    I like that strategy.

  44. #508964
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:13 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Bengals #9 – even better, just one of the four justices who believe in the Constitution (Scalia, Alito, Thomas, Roberts), or the coin flip Justice Kennedy shuffle off this mortal coil, and Obama and his probably filibuster proof Senate majority can appoint a justice that ensures a 5-4 Marxist rubber stamp to anything Obama wants, constitutional or not.

  45. #508967
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:15 pm, American Elephant said:

    Is that a photoshop or just a photo labeled with the word “FAIL”? If you call it a photoshop and its really Obama holding the phone upside down, people are going to assume the phone was photoshopped.

  46. #508970
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:16 pm, tuffy said:

    Fantastic. Since I can’t post over there, I’ll say it here: Thank you!

    I’ve been looking for a comprehensive piece to send to my bf in Iraq. This will do just fine. I’ll send the essay and burn a DVD. Thanks again!

  47. #508979
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:21 pm, GladzKravtz said:

    I remember the Obama who didn’t put his hand over his heart during the National Anthem.
    I remember the Obama who didn’t wear a flag on his lapel early in the primaries.
    This is the real Obama before the handlers got to him. Those two simple ‘gestures’ (or lack thereof) tell me all I need to know about the man. All the info I have learned after that only confirms who that real Obama is.

    It was simple.

  48. #508985
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:24 pm, American Elephant said:

    Help spread the word about Hot Air’s piece.

    Digg it! and

    Reddit it!.

    If you dont have accounts, sign up. It only takes a couple minutes and the more people that Digg and Reddit it, the more people will see it.

    (I still don’t understand why conservative websites dont use social bookmarking, it only increases the audience for your ideas)

  49. #508987
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:25 pm, Charly Martel said:

    stevevvs said:

    “He is horrible, he will destroy the country, period.
    Chuck Baldwin and the Constitution Party are our only hope at this time.”

    Yeah right, one more vote for a guy who can’t possibly win, one less vote AGAINST a disaster of a candidate.

    John Deaux asks:

    “How many times have you heard people say that it doesn’t matter who we elect, they’re all the same?
    Quite often that’s true, but this time, they’re really, really wrong.”

    It’s the difference between a candidate who loves our country and one who thinks this is a mean country that should be taken down a peg or two.

    This time reaching across the aisle will result in the loss of your hand.

  50. #508992
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:28 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Hewitt has been so consistently wrong on just about every issue/prediction that he’s almost bordering William Kristol on the dipsh*t scale.

    Ok, you made me laugh… :)

  51. #508993
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:28 pm, cheapseat said:

    his mother is a citizen, so he is a citizen unless subsequent events, his choosing a different citizenship, deny him of his citizenship. there are tons of questions about his background that have gone unanswered, but just as with mccain, obama (if born to his stated mother) would be a citizen even if born outside the u.s.

  52. #508994
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:28 pm, conservativesRus said:

    Maybe lawsuit on his citizenship is silent at this moment for a strategic reason. Let Obama be elected but then lose the lawsuit. Then what happens?
    Some might argue that Biden would be it – but others would argue that since Biden never became Vice President…he was not elected – therefore McCain. I’m not sure how it would play out except to say chaos would reign.

  53. #508995
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:29 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I remember the Obama who didn’t put his hand over his heart during the National Anthem.

    This would make a nice commercial – music and him standing there like the Marxist he is.

  54. #508997
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:29 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    We have just as much chance of Reagan resurrecting as we do of any of those winning the election. Why not complain about how we were promised we’d have flying cars by 2000?

    And we have the same chance of having a conservativein the White House in January, so why not vote for someone of substance?

    If you want to whine about flying cars, go to some street aviation site or something.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  55. #509001
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:31 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    Either McCain or Obama will be elected President – that’s really. Between the two, who would you leave to your kids?

    With those two swine as the choices, my kids had better get ready to vote Smith and Wesson.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  56. #509002
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:31 pm, nyc123me said:

    Obama illustrating how phones will work once he is president.

  57. #509006
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:32 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    (PS – I confess ignorance to Baldwin – who and what he stands for are immaterial in this election.)

    If a conservative candidate and what he stands for are immaterial, then the battle and the war to save the Constitution are already lost.

    I will continue to fight until my last breath is drawn.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  58. #509015
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:36 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    Voting for a 3rd party in this election ensures an Obama victory. You can be as smug as you want paying huge taxes, claiming you didn’t vote for either, but you are still going to pay higher taxes.

    Voting third party ensures that America knows where she stands with her people.

    You are a fool if you believe you’re not going to get higher taxes anyway, regardless of which of these two traitors crosses his fingers and takes the Oath. Do you really think his nutty enviro-agenda and socialist-level understanding of economics will allow any different?

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  59. #509017
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:36 pm, cheapseat said:

    the real question that begs an answer is why the jewish vote is still supporting this muslim converted to afrocentric america hating sort of a christian (ok his wife belongs to this christian church). the entire muslim world, including all his relatives, think he’s muslim, and will support them over israel.

  60. #509025
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:39 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    The word is out on Obama. Anyone that wants to know who and what he is politically can easily find out. He is a socialist liberal democrat hell bent on turning this country into a giant wellfare program. He is determined to raise taxes on anything that moves. He is a lock to make abortion a permanent scar on this country.

    Shameful that the same word can’t be put out on McCain, as he’s just as guilty of all og the above.

    If he does better on the war effort than his predecessor, there may be an America left to save after 4 years.

    I’m not holding my breath.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  61. #509030
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:40 pm, flenser said:

    Your vote to do as you please, if that is what consience demands, but you’re casting what may be a vote in the last free election ever held in this country on a candidate that won’t get even an entire percentage point.

    If you believe that that’s what we’re up against, I’m not sure why you’re piddling about with elections. Buy a gun and learn to use it. That’s the origin of freedom, not voting.

  62. #509032
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:41 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    There’s no logical way to continue with (soon-to-be) trillion dollar yearly deficits without raising taxes substantially or resorting to hyper-inflation.

    Cutting taxes substantially and spending the same or less will do the job rather nicely. Massive tax cuts DO result in massive increases in revenues. That’s one thing Bush did right at the beginning.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  63. #509033
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:42 pm, MtsEdge said:

    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:29 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    I remember the Obama who didn’t put his hand over his heart during the National Anthem.
    This would make a nice commercial – music and him standing there like the Marxist he is.

    And wouldn’t wear a flag pin (until shamed for not doing it) b/c it was “too controversial.” Ugh.

  64. #509034
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:42 pm, zorro said:

    An excellent piece of work! Very well done.

    Ed was good addition to the Hot Air staff… very good.

  65. #509035
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:43 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    the real question that begs an answer is why the jewish vote is still supporting this muslim converted to afrocentric america hating sort of a christian (ok his wife belongs to this christian church). the entire muslim world, including all his relatives, think he’s muslim, and will support them over israel.

    The real question that begs an answer is actually why in the world a commentor on a conservative blog is discussing demographic groups like a liberal.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  66. #509036
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:43 pm, flenser said:

    the real question that begs an answer is why the jewish vote is still supporting this muslim converted to afrocentric america hating sort of a christian (ok his wife belongs to this christian church). the entire muslim world, including all his relatives, think he’s muslim, and will support them over israel.

    Because Jews are not remotely as pro-Israel as right-wing Christians are. Isn’t that blindingly obvious?

  67. #509038
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:43 pm, conservativesRus said:

    For once and for all…your vote only matters if you are in a few select states. Our system has an electoral college. I could vote McCain 1000 times and my state (CT) would still give it’s electoral votes to Obama. Therefore, my vote for a 3rd party does not change things one iota. On the other hand, if I were in one of the battleground states (or even moderately battleground states), then my vote is doubly important.
    The Christian in me realizes that God isn’t concerned about nearly so much about economics as morals. One candidate completely perverts what is good and what is evil….even stooping so low as to kill babies and calling it good and completely contorts God’s word – even thinking he is god. The other major candidate at least seems to recognize that authority only comes from above and has a history of being against killing babies. If my vote matters – it goes to McCain. If it doesn’t matter, a 3rd party gets it.

  68. #509040
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:46 pm, John Deaux said:

    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:32 pm, rightwingrocker said:
    (PS – I confess ignorance to Baldwin – who and what he stands for are immaterial in this election.)
    If a conservative candidate and what he stands for are immaterial, then the battle and the war to save the Constitution are already lost.

    I will continue to fight until my last breath is drawn.

    You tell ‘em, Don Quixote!

  69. #509043
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:49 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    just as with mccain, obama (if born to his stated mother) would be a citizen even if born outside the u.s.

    Interesting this was brought up, since McCain was born on base in Panama. I believe that qualifies him as born on US soil, as the Constitution requires. Oblahma was born on US soil and has apparently maintained legal US citizenship, so this whole bit is a foolish distraction unless it can be shown that one or the other (or for that matter, both) has relinquished his citizenship.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  70. #509049
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:55 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:43 pm, conservativesRus said:

    Well said. I could vote Republican 10,000 times here and Oblahma would still get my states votes.

    Still, McCain has done nothing to deserve my vote, so he’s not getting it.

    I have to disagree with you on the suggestion that McCain has “a history against killing babies”, though. Any person who refers to Roe as “established law” will not have, in my opinion, “a history against killing babies”.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  71. #509052
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:56 pm, John Deaux said:

    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:49 pm, rightwingrocker said:
    …so this whole bit is a foolish distraction…

    Exactly! By not releasing these records, he can get people to think he has something to hide in those records so they’ll focus on that instead of more important areas.

    RWR, You might be dead wrong on who to vote for, but you hit the nail on the head with this.

  72. #509053
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:56 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    If you believe that that’s what we’re up against, I’m not sure why you’re piddling about with elections. Buy a gun and learn to use it. That’s the origin of freedom, not voting.

    Well said.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  73. #509055
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:58 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    RWR, You might be dead wrong on who to vote for, but you hit the nail on the head with this.

    Sir, you will find I’m right about quite a bit and more.

    Americans will rue the day they elected liberal McCain or liberal Oblahma to the White House. Mark my words.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  74. #509056
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:58 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:57 pm, John Deaux said:

    On October 21st, 2008 at 1:55 pm, ThatSamIAm said:
    If he gets elected it will be because the American people no longer care what happens in this country.

    How many times have you heard people say that it doesn’t matter who we elect, they’re all the same?

    Quite often that’s true, but this time, they’re really, really wrong.

    If that position is based on speculation of Obama’s view of the inerrant nature of the US, I can understand the statement. However, based on public statements, voting records, and proposed solutions to current issues, these two have been the most indistinguishable pair of candidates I have ever seen.

  75. #509059
    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:59 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    By not releasing these records, he can get people to think he has something to hide in those records so they’ll focus on that instead of more important areas.

    It’s a foolish distraction for people who are willing to listen to it. Whether by bringing it up or by paying it attention, it’s not Oblahma that’s causing the distraction – it’s the people who pay attention to it.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  76. #509065
    On October 21st, 2008 at 3:04 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    However, based on public statements, voting records, and proposed solutions to current issues, these two have been the most indistinguishable pair of candidates I have ever seen.

    Amen.

    KEYES/ROHRBOUGH ‘08

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  77. #509068
    On October 21st, 2008 at 3:07 pm, cicerokid said:

    If that were the case RWR, would his precious MSM be all over it?

  78. #509071
    On October 21st, 2008 at 3:09 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    Sometimes I wish the internets were more original. Like Sen. Ted Stevens said,

    And again, the Internet is not something that you just dump something on. It’s not a big truck. It’s a series of tubes. And if you don’t understand, those tubes can be filled and if they are filled, when you put your message in, it gets in line and it’s going to be delayed by anyone that puts into that tube enormous amounts of material, enormous amounts of material.

    I found this image while traveling in the tubes.

  79. #509073
    On October 21st, 2008 at 3:09 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:40 pm, flenser said:
    Your vote to do as you please, if that is what consience demands, but you’re casting what may be a vote in the last free election ever held in this country on a candidate that won’t get even an entire percentage point.
    If you believe that that’s what we’re up against, I’m not sure why you’re piddling about with elections. Buy a gun and learn to use it. That’s the origin of freedom, not voting.

    The Obama DoJ/FBI will be monitoring web sites like this. It would be foolish to discuss what will need to be done on highly read forums if what I expect to happen under Obama does indeed happen.

    I do expect, if Obama wins, national same day registration and voting, everything that can be done to ensure voter fraud is successful, and a new version of the ‘Fairness Doctrine’ to muzzle conservative talk radio, maybe even web sites.

    It’ll be done incrementally, so there won’t be one defining moment that causes the masses of patriots to take to the streets together. By the time an Obama friendly Supreme Court revokes Heller, and Congress imposes sharp new gun control, potential freedom fighters will have been identified to be picked up at the first sign of trouble.

  80. #509076
    On October 21st, 2008 at 3:12 pm, John Deaux said:

    On October 21st, 2008 at 2:58 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:
    However, based on public statements, voting records, and proposed solutions to current issues, these two have been the most indistinguishable pair of candidates I have ever seen.

    If you can’t see the difference, you haven’t been paying attention.

  81. #509077
    On October 21st, 2008 at 3:13 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    If a conservative candidate and what he stands for are immaterial, then the battle and the war to save the Constitution are already lost.

    In this election he is completly irrelevant. One of two people will be elected, and he is not one of them. If you want Baldwin, now is the time to start for 2012.

    McCain or Obama will likely appoint Supreme Court Justices – do you think there would be no difference in those appointments? Bush hasn’t been a conservative but we got Roberts and Alito. Who would we have gotten with Kerry? Sorry, I’m pragmatic, between the two who stand a chance of getting elected I think there could be a huge difference in SCOTUS.

  82. #509084
    On October 21st, 2008 at 3:15 pm, brooklyn red said:

    I found this image while traveling in the tubes.

    Hmmmm, seems that they forgot to airbrush out the connection on the bottom of the handset, or the reflected colors on the cord from were it used to cross his tie (when it went into the handset)… not a pro job at all.

  83. #509088
    On October 21st, 2008 at 3:16 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    If you can’t see the difference, you haven’t been paying attention.

    One’s old and one’s kinda black?

  84. #509090
    On October 21st, 2008 at 3:17 pm, Bear said:

    For those that think their firearms will protect the US remember that Obama and crew want to take them away. Remember Feinstein saying that if she had the votes she would do just that. When all the Democrats are elected along with Obama, Feinstein and crew will have enough votes. Especially without a Supreme Court with any member willing to uphold the Constitution. If Obama and crews do not have enough on the court remember that Franklin Roosevelt added enough justices to get his socialist programs made Constitutional.

  85. #509091
    On October 21st, 2008 at 3:17 pm, blacktygrrrr said:

    Michelle,

    One story that I am trying to get major attention on is the fact that Obama is waging war against the Republican Jewish Coalition.

    Obama’s own Jewish surrogates have publicly admitted that the Obama campaign demanded that they stop debating members of the RJC at Synagogues. They even pulled out of debates at the last minute in the hopes that the events would be cancelled.

    The rationale was that Synagogues would be scared of biased events. The Synagogues instead demanded that the debates go on.

    The RJC (I am a member) is the premier Jewish Republican organization in America.

    The Jewish Journal in LA has picked up the story, and hopefully your readers can question why such thuggish tactics are allowed.

    The url is too long for me to paste here, so I will just link to my regular site. If you feel it is close enough to your thread, I can trackback it.

    Respectfully,

    eric aka the Tygrrrr Express
    http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com

  86. #509097
    On October 21st, 2008 at 3:18 pm, josetheguerilla said:

    That piece was put together well. You can’t hit any harder than that. I’m impressed. Hotair kicks ass!!!

    The guerilla

  87. #509103
    On October 21st, 2008 at 3:22 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    If that were the case RWR, would his precious MSM be all over it?

    Who cares? If you are paying attention to stupid crap like that, then you are contributing to a foolish distraction.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  88. #509107
    On October 21st, 2008 at 3:25 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    McCain or Obama will likely appoint Supreme Court Justices – do you think there would be no difference in those appointments? Bush hasn’t been a conservative but we got Roberts and Alito. Who would we have gotten with Kerry? Sorry, I’m pragmatic, between the two who stand a chance of getting elected I think there could be a huge difference in SCOTUS.

    There is no reason to think McCain will be any better in this area. Remember the Gang of 14? The whole point of that was that McCain and his liberal pals were going to stand in the way of any conservative put up by President Bush.

    What evidence do you have that he has changed on this matter?

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  89. #509109
    On October 21st, 2008 at 3:26 pm, flenser said:

    For those that think their firearms will protect the US remember that Obama and crew want to take them away. Remember Feinstein saying that if she had the votes she would do just that.

    Votes have nothing to do with it. The Founders did not conduct a vote to decide to have the Revolution.

    People on the right like to say that our rights are natural rights, God given rights, which do not originate from goverenment and which government cannot take away.

    I’m starting to think that they’re full of wind though.

  90. #509112
    On October 21st, 2008 at 3:26 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    If Obama and crews do not have enough on the court remember that Franklin Roosevelt added enough justices to get his socialist programs made Constitutional.

    Justices don’t make things Constitutional.

    People voting in favor of Constitutional Amendments does.

    Now what will YOU do to stop McBama?

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  91. #509120
    On October 21st, 2008 at 3:29 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Obama the putz!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Emetic of the day

November 19, 2009 01:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

93 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“You guys make a pretty good photo op.”

How do you say “You lie!” in Mandarin?

November 18, 2009 09:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

Obama’s double-talk on dissent.

Cartoon of the day

November 16, 2009 10:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Rear-ended.

President O-bow-ma

November 14, 2009 09:34 PM by Michelle Malkin

184 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Downward dog.

The fall of the Berlin Wall

November 9, 2009 10:10 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

All the president’s hacks

November 5, 2009 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

23 Comments | 1 Trackback

Mmm, mmm, mmm

November 4, 2009 09:00 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 2 Trackbacks


Categories: Barack Obama



Nice Deb

» O
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook