<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times bonds near junk territory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/23/new-york-times-stock-nears-junk-territory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/23/new-york-times-stock-nears-junk-territory/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:23:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Beck Shows Us How to Fight&#8230;..[Updated] - Susannah&#8217;s blog - RedState</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/23/new-york-times-stock-nears-junk-territory/comment-page-2/#comment-807265</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Beck Shows Us How to Fight&#8230;..[Updated] - Susannah&#8217;s blog - RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17527#comment-807265</guid>
		<description>[...] And finally, I can tell that both the conservative and the liberal elite are scratching their heads and wondering aloud, “What exactly is Glenn Beck’s appeal?&#8221; Yesterday, on This Week, I heard David Brooks (the NYT’s token “conservative columnist”) say that Glenn Beck’s viewers are “the fringe”. Well, there is no way that Beck would be able to get the high ratings that he gets if his viewers were nothing but “the fringe”. No, his viewers now consist of conservatives, moderates and, dare I say, some liberals who want to know exactly what in hell is going on with their country. Simply put, Glenn Beck’s appeal is that he actually breaks news and tells people things that other news organizations won’t. Yes, Beck is prone to crying jags, he is known to wear lederhosen and he can be over the top with some of his rants (even his friend Jonah Goldberg admits this). However, he tells people what is really going on—so even if they find him obnoxious (I don’t, but I realize that some do), they will sit through it, because they are sick to death of all of the Obama cheerleading and they want some real, honest to goodness news. Funny tidbit here—I saw a diary the other night on Daily Kos titled, “Wake up Obama: Beckism is Winning!”. Well if by “Beckism”, he or she means “telling the truth and not cheerleading for Obama”, then yes, “Beckism” is winning, because MSNBC’s numbers are in the toilet and The New York Times is now a junk bond. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And finally, I can tell that both the conservative and the liberal elite are scratching their heads and wondering aloud, “What exactly is Glenn Beck’s appeal?&#8221; Yesterday, on This Week, I heard David Brooks (the NYT’s token “conservative columnist”) say that Glenn Beck’s viewers are “the fringe”. Well, there is no way that Beck would be able to get the high ratings that he gets if his viewers were nothing but “the fringe”. No, his viewers now consist of conservatives, moderates and, dare I say, some liberals who want to know exactly what in hell is going on with their country. Simply put, Glenn Beck’s appeal is that he actually breaks news and tells people things that other news organizations won’t. Yes, Beck is prone to crying jags, he is known to wear lederhosen and he can be over the top with some of his rants (even his friend Jonah Goldberg admits this). However, he tells people what is really going on—so even if they find him obnoxious (I don’t, but I realize that some do), they will sit through it, because they are sick to death of all of the Obama cheerleading and they want some real, honest to goodness news. Funny tidbit here—I saw a diary the other night on Daily Kos titled, “Wake up Obama: Beckism is Winning!”. Well if by “Beckism”, he or she means “telling the truth and not cheerleading for Obama”, then yes, “Beckism” is winning, because MSNBC’s numbers are in the toilet and The New York Times is now a junk bond. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Beck Shows Us How to Fight&#8230;.. - Susannah&#8217;s blog - RedState</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/23/new-york-times-stock-nears-junk-territory/comment-page-2/#comment-805862</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Beck Shows Us How to Fight&#8230;.. - Susannah&#8217;s blog - RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17527#comment-805862</guid>
		<description>[...] And finally, I can tell that both the conservative and the liberal elite are scratching their heads and wondering aloud, “What exactly is Glenn Beck’s appeal”? Today on This Week, I heard David Brooks (the NYT’s token “conservative columnist”) say that Glenn Beck’s viewers are “the fringe”. Well, there is no way that Beck would be able to get the high ratings that he gets if his viewers were nothing but “the fringe”. No, his viewers now consist of conservatives, moderates and, dare I say, some liberals who want to know exactly what in hell is going on with their country. Simply put, Glenn Beck’s appeal is that he actually breaks news and tells people things that other news organizations won’t. Yes, Beck is prone to crying jags, he is known to wear lederhosen and he can be over the top with some of his rants (even his friend Jonah Goldberg admits this). However, he tells people what is really going on—so even if they find him obnoxious (I don’t, but I realize that some do), they will sit through it, because they are sick to death of all of the Obama cheerleading and they want some real, honest to goodness news. Funny tidbit here—I saw a diary the other night on Daily Kos titled, “Wake up Obama: Beckism is Winning!”. Well if by “Beckism”, he or she means “telling the truth and not cheerleading for Obama”, then yes, “Beckism” is winning, because MSNBC’s numbers are in the toilet and The New York Times is now a junk bond. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And finally, I can tell that both the conservative and the liberal elite are scratching their heads and wondering aloud, “What exactly is Glenn Beck’s appeal”? Today on This Week, I heard David Brooks (the NYT’s token “conservative columnist”) say that Glenn Beck’s viewers are “the fringe”. Well, there is no way that Beck would be able to get the high ratings that he gets if his viewers were nothing but “the fringe”. No, his viewers now consist of conservatives, moderates and, dare I say, some liberals who want to know exactly what in hell is going on with their country. Simply put, Glenn Beck’s appeal is that he actually breaks news and tells people things that other news organizations won’t. Yes, Beck is prone to crying jags, he is known to wear lederhosen and he can be over the top with some of his rants (even his friend Jonah Goldberg admits this). However, he tells people what is really going on—so even if they find him obnoxious (I don’t, but I realize that some do), they will sit through it, because they are sick to death of all of the Obama cheerleading and they want some real, honest to goodness news. Funny tidbit here—I saw a diary the other night on Daily Kos titled, “Wake up Obama: Beckism is Winning!”. Well if by “Beckism”, he or she means “telling the truth and not cheerleading for Obama”, then yes, “Beckism” is winning, because MSNBC’s numbers are in the toilet and The New York Times is now a junk bond. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; And so, it has come to pass&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/23/new-york-times-stock-nears-junk-territory/comment-page-2/#comment-658271</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; And so, it has come to pass&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17527#comment-658271</guid>
		<description>[...] October 23, 2008: &#8220;New York Times bonds near junk territory&#8230;Anyone smelling a bailout plea coming on?&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] October 23, 2008: &#8220;New York Times bonds near junk territory&#8230;Anyone smelling a bailout plea coming on?&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Cash-strapped NYT tries to offload Boston Red Sox</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/23/new-york-times-stock-nears-junk-territory/comment-page-2/#comment-577956</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Cash-strapped NYT tries to offload Boston Red Sox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 23:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17527#comment-577956</guid>
		<description>[...] Fishwrap of Record&#8217;s bonds and reputation are in the tank. What to do? Sell, sell, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fishwrap of Record&#8217;s bonds and reputation are in the tank. What to do? Sell, sell, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense Political Thought &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Eighteenth century technology, part 4</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/23/new-york-times-stock-nears-junk-territory/comment-page-2/#comment-568627</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense Political Thought &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Eighteenth century technology, part 4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17527#comment-568627</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin&#8217;s prescient prediction (how about that: both alliterative and redundant!), made way back in October, and reiterated in November (before the Tribune Company&#8217;s Chapter 11 filing) that the major [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin&#8217;s prescient prediction (how about that: both alliterative and redundant!), made way back in October, and reiterated in November (before the Tribune Company&#8217;s Chapter 11 filing) that the major [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Party Poop</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/23/new-york-times-stock-nears-junk-territory/comment-page-2/#comment-560421</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Party Poop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17527#comment-560421</guid>
		<description>[...] mania has already degenerated into an absolute farce. As predicted, the mainstream media now wants to steal from taxpayers to bail out their moonbatty newspapers, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mania has already degenerated into an absolute farce. As predicted, the mainstream media now wants to steal from taxpayers to bail out their moonbatty newspapers, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; The newspaper bailout countdown clock: It&#8217;s here!</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/23/new-york-times-stock-nears-junk-territory/comment-page-2/#comment-559955</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; The newspaper bailout countdown clock: It&#8217;s here!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17527#comment-559955</guid>
		<description>[...] in October, I joked that it wouldn&#8217;t be long before the junk-bond New York Times was lining up for a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in October, I joked that it wouldn&#8217;t be long before the junk-bond New York Times was lining up for a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal NYT Prank &#124; Jud Stephenson</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/23/new-york-times-stock-nears-junk-territory/comment-page-2/#comment-543548</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal NYT Prank &#124; Jud Stephenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17527#comment-543548</guid>
		<description>[...] New York gathering places like Union Square and Penn Station. The funny part is the date. The NYT will be bankrupt by 2009.      &#171; Top 10 Online [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New York gathering places like Union Square and Penn Station. The funny part is the date. The NYT will be bankrupt by 2009.      &laquo; Top 10 Online [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; The newspaper bailout countdown clock</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/23/new-york-times-stock-nears-junk-territory/comment-page-2/#comment-540557</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; The newspaper bailout countdown clock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17527#comment-540557</guid>
		<description>[...] think it&#8217;s time to start the newspaper bailout countdown clock. A few weeks ago, I joked that it wouldn&#8217;t be long until the junky New York Times started crawling to the government for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] think it&#8217;s time to start the newspaper bailout countdown clock. A few weeks ago, I joked that it wouldn&#8217;t be long until the junky New York Times started crawling to the government for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is it possible to “leak” that someone’s a fugitive? &#124; Right Voices</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/23/new-york-times-stock-nears-junk-territory/comment-page-2/#comment-525124</link>
		<dc:creator>Is it possible to “leak” that someone’s a fugitive? &#124; Right Voices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 14:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17527#comment-525124</guid>
		<description>[...] the national average by a gazillion percent.  The Washington Post&#8217;s earnings are down 86%.  The New York Times has been rated &#8220;junk&#8221; by Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s.  The Los Angeles Times is headed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the national average by a gazillion percent.  The Washington Post&#8217;s earnings are down 86%.  The New York Times has been rated &#8220;junk&#8221; by Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s.  The Los Angeles Times is headed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Even Female Conservative Pundits Embrace Palin Bashing&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/23/new-york-times-stock-nears-junk-territory/comment-page-2/#comment-518121</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Even Female Conservative Pundits Embrace Palin Bashing&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17527#comment-518121</guid>
		<description>[...] Why she’d want to work for a paper that is spiraling further down the economic sinkhole, with stocks that are near junk status, is beyond me. But the rumor has escalated beyond the Times and gone straight to the White House: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why she’d want to work for a paper that is spiraling further down the economic sinkhole, with stocks that are near junk status, is beyond me. But the rumor has escalated beyond the Times and gone straight to the White House: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pajamas Media » Even Female Conservative Pundits Embrace Palin Bashing</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/23/new-york-times-stock-nears-junk-territory/comment-page-1/#comment-517464</link>
		<dc:creator>Pajamas Media » Even Female Conservative Pundits Embrace Palin Bashing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17527#comment-517464</guid>
		<description>[...] Why she&#8217;d want to work for a paper that is spiraling further down the economic sinkhole, with stocks that are near junk status, is beyond me. But the rumor has escalated beyond the Times and gone straight to the White [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why she&#8217;d want to work for a paper that is spiraling further down the economic sinkhole, with stocks that are near junk status, is beyond me. But the rumor has escalated beyond the Times and gone straight to the White [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New York Times bonds near junk territory &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/23/new-york-times-stock-nears-junk-territory/comment-page-1/#comment-517420</link>
		<dc:creator>New York Times bonds near junk territory &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17527#comment-517420</guid>
		<description>[...] If you want to read more about it, proceed here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you want to read more about it, proceed here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bailing Out Old Media &#171; New Wars</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/23/new-york-times-stock-nears-junk-territory/comment-page-1/#comment-515196</link>
		<dc:creator>Bailing Out Old Media &#171; New Wars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17527#comment-515196</guid>
		<description>[...] In her report on Moody&#8217;s possible downgrading of The New York Times to junk status, Michelle Malkin concludes with a throwaway line: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In her report on Moody&#8217;s possible downgrading of The New York Times to junk status, Michelle Malkin concludes with a throwaway line: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ¿Cuál fue el último republicano que apoyó el &#8216;prestigioso&#8217; New York Times? &#171; REVISTA JUPITER</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/23/new-york-times-stock-nears-junk-territory/comment-page-1/#comment-514897</link>
		<dc:creator>¿Cuál fue el último republicano que apoyó el &#8216;prestigioso&#8217; New York Times? &#171; REVISTA JUPITER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17527#comment-514897</guid>
		<description>[...] agencia Moody´s considera bajar el rating del New York Times a una categoría conocida como basura, debido a bajos ingresos y pocas posibilidades de renegociar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] agencia Moody´s considera bajar el rating del New York Times a una categoría conocida como basura, debido a bajos ingresos y pocas posibilidades de renegociar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
