Open-borders McCain advisor Juan Hernandez approves…

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 23, 2008 10:10 AM

…of Sarah Palin’s shamnesty straddle.

Looks like she has been briefed on all the specious, open-borders mantras, has no idea about the proven strategy of attrition, and buys into the “path to citizenship” pabulum embraced by McCain, Grahamnesty, et al.

Dear Sarah,

Where can I send you copies of The Immigration Solution: A Better Plan Than Today’s and Invasion before it’s too late?

And a free piece of advice: Stay away from Juan Hernandez. He is not your friend. He is not a friend of “real America.”

Read this. Watch this.

We’re Screwed ‘08!

Posted in: Amnesty, Sarah Palin

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Open-borders McCain advisor Juan Hernandez approves… | PoliticsMuch.com
  2. Open-borders McCain advisor Juan Hernandez approves… | PoliticsMuch.com
  3. Palin Betrays Base On Immigration Amnesty | PoliticsMuch.com
  4. Palin backs citizenship for "illegal aliens" - The WebZappR
  5. Stop Breeding Recipients (Whose Having the Kids? Producers-Taxpayers or Recipients?) « Zipline Conservative
  6. Palin on Immigration Amnesty - Debate Politics Forums

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #512130
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 1:29 pm, flenser said:

    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:23 am, nyk said:

    Maybe McCain will introduce Sarah to his socialist economic policies as well.

    Now you think that socialist economic policies are a bad thing? I’m having trouble keping up with your hypocritical flip-flopping.

  2. #512138
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 1:36 pm, flenser said:

    Which of the two candidates do you think we’ll have more sway with on this issue? The imperfect one, or the Marxist???

    If you put it like that, the Marxist. The Marxist has not made amnesty the centerpiece of his domestic policy agenda. That would be McCain, who said recently that whether he is in the Senate or the WH next year, amnesty will be his top priority.

  3. #512178
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 2:15 pm, NDgal said:

    This is an important issue and I see why MM had to say something about it. It would be obvious and almost dishonest for her not to discuss it.

    I don’t know if those are Governor Palin’s true positions or not, but I don’t think she could get away with not backing McCain on this one. Shamnesty was his bread and butter and although she’s gotten away with differing on ANWR, I think they’d call her on this one.

    I was reminded yesterday in the “Photo of the Day” post, that my biggest reason to vote for McCain has always been the troops. I cannot imagine the end results of his end the war not win the war principles.

  4. #512216
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 2:45 pm, Lindsay said:

    vikisoup #90, Preach it, sister!

  5. #512280
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 3:12 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Speaking of Marxists and immigration,
    how about that Marxist from the “birthplace” of May Day (Chicago) who said:

    I remember May Day

  6. #512295
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 3:17 pm, emjem24 said:

    30 pcs of silver said:
    Obama must go down in flames. This “experiment” by the DNC cannot be rewarded. I realize that the RNC has resorted to an experiment of their own; however, the crucial difference here is that they can possibly learn from their mistakes. We can send all of the messages we need to to get things back on track once we clear this hurdle. First and foremost – is stopping the empty suit with ties to all sorts of radicals, terrorists, etc.

    I concur. While I’m disappointed at Palin’s take on immigration, I’m more scared of what Obummer and his minions have in store for all of us. Can any one president (sorry Obummer isn’t a god) fix the economy? If we’re truly living in a free market economy, let it hit bottom and rebuild.

    I strongly disagree with our hostess about why she suddenly has to put a target on Palin regarding this issue. It’s not like Alaska is a state that experiences a ton of immigration anyway. I’m not surprised but I really think we need to concentrate on getting McCain/Palin elected. I will hold my nose and vote for McCain/Palin because the alternative of a more bloated federal government that wants to stick its nose in my finances and life in general is just one more reason.

    Let’s address this after the election should McCain/Palin be elected. :roll:

  7. #512325
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 3:30 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    You’ve probably seen the pictures of Obama and Ayers disrespecting our flag (at the bottom of this post).

    If you want to see more pictures of how our flag (and people of “European” descent) would be treated under a “May Day” Administration, look back at this MM post from March of this year.

    Those demonstrators are just itching to yell, “Get used to it white boy, the days of people like you are over. We are in charge now!

  8. #512525
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 4:53 pm, Valiant said:

    For some real fun, translate the Spanish comments from our friendsh at the Univision link, All this Hispandering is a waste of time.

  9. #512748
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 7:37 pm, Bill Grant said:

    Better get you last kicks at the old man in fast Michelle Malkin.

  10. #512845
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 8:57 pm, maisy said:

    Does anyone else get the irony of the candidates both fighting to achieve the Presidency…..yet both are all for open borders …which will cause a MASSIVE tidal wave of illegal impoverished, non-english speaking peasants……..What in the name of God makes them think there will still be a country left to be a President of once their plans are realized???? The stupidity of these clowns is beyond belief.

  11. #512966
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:50 pm, Send_Me said:

    My vote: “None of the Above”. We have what we have now because “conservatives” voted for the lesser of two evils the last five times. Let’s not make it number six. If “conservatives” want a “conservative” in office, then perhaps they should consider voting for a “conservative”. This issue of illegal immigration is evidence of that.
    One other thing: gotta love this political cartoon.

  12. #512992
    On October 24th, 2008 at 12:54 am, Send_Me said:

    I see Valiant has been fighting the good fight for ideals versus short-term, half-solutions to pain and fear. Vickisoup, seriously, could you be any more short-sighted than you are? And people wonder how we got to this point, a choice between Obama or McCain, a socialist or a moderate socialist? Ever since Reagan, the Republicans, specifically the “conservative” branch of the party, has sold its soul in order to save what little they have left in terms of representation by the Republican candidates. “Conservatives” have been weak-minded, short-sighted, and, frankly, cowardly in regards to standing up for their beliefs. “Conservatives” (I have a hard time finding the meaning of the term anymore- even McCain claims to be one) have done themselves no favors by consistently voting for the “lesser of two evils” in the past 5 elections. We wonder why McCain won’t listen to the “base”? Have you ever thought that he realizes, with good reason, that he doesn’t have to do so? Why should he? He already has your vote. What else does he need from you? So what, you’re pissed off? Why should he care if you’re pissed off if he still gets your vote? “Conservatives” have been weak in not demanding that Republican candidates stand for their principles or else they won’t vote for them. “Conservatives” have lacked any vision by thinking that things would somehow get better by continually giving their blind support to those who don’t support their ideals. “Conservatives” have been cowardly by fearing the loss of what little they have in terms of political representation have rather than trying to win.
    I say you’re short-sighted because what do you think will happen in 2010 and 2012 as a result of a McCain Presidency? Given his support for policies destined for failure for the country and judges who aren’t originalists, especially combined with a Democratic Congress, the Republicans will take the blame for the inevitable pain caused to the country. This will lose more seats in Congress in 2010 and 2012 for the Republicans, not to mention an almost certain election of Obama (or Clinton) in 2012. Why would people vote for Palin, the VP for a failed President? That didn’t work too well for Ford or Mondale.
    So this election day, whether anyone else stands with me or not, I’m doing my part to say “That is the last straw” to the Republican party by voting for a third party candidate. Some may say, “oh, well you’re giving your vote to Obama.” No, my vote is going to someone who shares the ideals to which I’m dedicating my life to defend, something of which neither Obama nor McCain have any apparent understanding.

  13. #513049
    On October 24th, 2008 at 4:30 am, Excessive Moderate said:

    Just two points.

    We already have a pro-amnesty POTUS and yet we defeated amnesty twice. We will do it again no matter who is the POTUS.

    I’m disappointed in Gov. Palin, but not surprised. There was already circumstantial evidence for her views, and this is just confirmation. What’s worse is that amnesty is such an electoral loser, and the hispandering is hardly paying off (23% for McCain was the last poll I saw).

  14. #513137
    On October 24th, 2008 at 8:13 am, Send_Me said:

    On October 24th, 2008 at 4:30 am, Excessive Moderate said:
    We already have a pro-amnesty POTUS and yet we defeated amnesty twice. We will do it again no matter who is the POTUS.

    Good luck with that considering how the Democrats will have an overwhelming majority in Congress. Under your logic, the bailout should have failed.

  15. #514108
    On October 24th, 2008 at 5:43 pm, Excessive Moderate said:

    Good luck with that considering how the Democrats will have an overwhelming majority in Congress. Under your logic, the bailout should have failed.

    Amnesty was defeated twice, and the Republicans wanted it almost as badly as the Democrats. Amnesty is opposed by nearly 70% of Americans, not even the bailout opposition was that high. The bailout came out of nowhere, but amnesty has been tried so often that opposition has had time to build.

    Good point about Congress, and Michelle should emphasize it – electing conservatives to Congress is much more important that the POTUS race. We’ve known since the primaries that “We’re Screwed ‘08″, but the congressional races have largely been ignored.

  16. #516626
    On October 27th, 2008 at 2:18 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    I email the McCain campaign weekly that if they want my vote they MUST dump juan hernandez mr. dual citizen, mr. think mexico first….until McCain gets rid of this man, he’ll never be believed about securing the border much less anything else…

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The indelible whiteness of MSNBC

November 23, 2009 05:07 AM by Michelle Malkin

101 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Palin-bashers of pallor.

Far Left’s ANSWER goons attack foes of illegal immigration

November 16, 2009 02:06 PM by Michelle Malkin

107 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Angry mob.

Who’s afraid of conservative American women?

November 16, 2009 11:17 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“Extreme” in a skirt.

All aboard the Obama Amnesty Bandwagon

November 13, 2009 01:58 PM by Michelle Malkin

63 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Sarah Palin: “Going Rogue”

September 28, 2009 05:52 PM by Michelle Malkin

96 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

Oh, no: Here comes “Open Borders For Teddy”

August 27, 2009 12:09 PM by Michelle Malkin

135 Comments | 11 Trackbacks


Categories: Amnesty, Sarah Palin



Nice Deb

» O
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook