Open-borders McCain advisor Juan Hernandez approves…

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 23, 2008 10:10 AM

…of Sarah Palin’s shamnesty straddle.

Looks like she has been briefed on all the specious, open-borders mantras, has no idea about the proven strategy of attrition, and buys into the “path to citizenship” pabulum embraced by McCain, Grahamnesty, et al.

Dear Sarah,

Where can I send you copies of The Immigration Solution: A Better Plan Than Today’s and Invasion before it’s too late?

And a free piece of advice: Stay away from Juan Hernandez. He is not your friend. He is not a friend of “real America.”

Read this. Watch this.

We’re Screwed ’08!

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Amnesty,Sarah Palin

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:12 am, Rob said:

    n my administration, this fool would have been taken out back… and disappeared, long ago.

  2. #2
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:22 am, Paul-Cincy said:

    In the past McCain had said several times, we can’t bus 12 million people back to Mexico. Well, if we enforce employment laws against illegal immigrants, they won’t have anywhere to work, and they’ll go back on their own. Duh! This had actually begun to happen in some southwestern border states. It’s a good plan. Sometimes I wonder about McCain’s motives. The godfather of one of his kids is Hispanic, and he’s cited at least one Hispanic Medal of Honor winner. Is that the tipping point for him to say Hispanics are all God’s children and so he doesn’t care whether or not they’re here illegally? Does he secretly admire the spunk of someone who comes here illegally, as it reminds him of something he’d do in his younger years? Well, I still support him. Just some mind experiments on why his stupid stance on illegal immigration.

  3. #3
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:23 am, nyk said:

    Maybe McCain will introduce Sarah to his socialist economic policies as well. Oh, how your words can come back to haunt you (the real nugget comes at about 2:00):
    http://crooksandliars.com/media/play/wmv/6633/23533
    Thanks to the Daily Show for, as always, doing the legwork and research the traditional media is too lazy to do.

  4. #4
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:24 am, CantCureStupid said:

    The CCS immigration plan…

    Dear Criminal Aliens who have no business here:

    The borders are closed. As of today’s date, you have 180 days to put your affairs in order and remove yourselves from American soil. On day 181, if you are foolish enough to remain here, you are a felon and you will be pursued, captured, prosecuted, jailed, and deported. You will never be eligible for legal citizenship once convicted. Your employer will be your cellmate.

    Please go home and attempt to enter this country legally. You do the right thing, and we’re glad to have you.

    God Bless America.

    There’s not much I wouldn’t give for a candidate with real rocks. This weenie capitulating to criminals makes me sick.

  5. #5
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:27 am, Paul-Cincy said:

    Look, Palin is going to back up McCain’s positions. If he’s for shamnesty, then so is she. That’s the VP’s job, and she’s doing it.

  6. #6
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:27 am, Jimmy the Notable said:

    Please Michelle, don’t deride Palin for ignorance, it really looks bad. Can’t we just assume she’s supporting the position of the top of the ticket on this one and its possible she has her own views, not that, as you said

    Looks like she has been briefed on all the specious, open-borders mantras, has no idea about the proven strategy of attrition, and buys into the “path to citizenship” pabulum embraced by McCain, Grahamnesty, et al.

    It makes it sound like she’s a blank slate and its insulting to her.

  7. #7
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:27 am, Bud Fox said:

    Maybe McCain will introduce Sarah to his socialist economic policies as well. Oh, how your words can come back to haunt you (the real nugget comes at about 2:00):

    Wow Nyk just glaze over the fact your boy Bill Ayers called for the genocide of 25 million capitalists. Vote Obama 08′…

  8. #8
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:30 am, Michelle Malkin said:

    Look, Palin is going to back up McCain’s positions. If he’s for shamnesty, then so is she. That’s the VP’s job, and she’s doing it.

    She’s openly opposed him on drilling in ANWR and the federal marriage amendment.

  9. #9
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:30 am, pyhtboss said:

    I’m done with this ticket. Get ready for President Sheik Hussein Obama

    And vote for Chuck Baldwin

  10. #10
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:33 am, Paul Revere said:

    I’m not sure why anyone is surprised at this. Girding the border FIRST is a must. We can change their minds on the other parts after the border is secured.

  11. #11
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:33 am, nyk said:

    Wow Nyk just glaze over the fact your boy Bill Ayers

    He’s not “my boy.” Next you’ll be saying I “palled around” with him, a man I’ve never met or seen. Please.

  12. #12
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:34 am, iamsaved said:

    I don’t believe anyone is going to solve the immigration or the economic problems during this campaign cycle.

    All the Obama campaign wants is for McCain to address the economy and how he will solve the problem. Give me a break. We have batallions of economists and so-called experts trying to figure out a solution and all the “great” minds have come up empty. Neither candidate is going to have anything but a pithy sound bite and no more.

    As to immigration, that’s another debate for a later time. It won’t be solved with rhetoric.

    However, in the meantime, continued enforcement of existing laws by prosecuting companies that knowingly higher illegals and cutting off free social give aways has shown that many of the 12 million voluntarily leave. It was getting so bad the Mexican government was complaining they couldn’t handle the influx of all those legal citizens coming back to their country.

  13. #13
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:35 am, Paul Revere said:

    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:30 am, pyhtboss said:
    I’m done with this ticket. Get ready for President Sheik Hussein Obama

    And vote for Chuck Baldwin

    Don’t be p***y. Over-the-top comments like that are ridiculous. You’re not going to vote for them because of this and let Obama get in and do worse? Ohhhhkaaaay.

  14. #14
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:37 am, DagneyT said:

    Palin has to “mimic” McCain’s stand points, until after the election. She cannot be seen to buck her boss.

  15. #15
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:38 am, Mookie said:

    What surprised me the most about this is that it took a reporter from Univision to ask her about immigration with less than two weeks to go before the election. You’d think it would have come up in an interview with one of our MSM people before now.

  16. #16
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:38 am, DBNinKY said:

    Does it not exist within the realm of possibilities that Obama was Ayers protege, with the same radical leanings and points of view? I think it does, and I am not alone.

  17. #17
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:39 am, Mookie said:

    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:37 am, DagneyT said:

    Palin has to “mimic” McCain’s stand points, until after the election. She cannot be seen to buck her boss.

    She’s bucked him on a lot of things already. ANWR, gay marriage, abortion, stem cell research, campaigning in Michigan, etc.

  18. #18
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:42 am, Rob said:

    I heard McAmnesty described as a “Trojan Horse” the other day.

    The idea being that Palin is just biding her time and riding the old fool into the White House where some good conservative values can be reawakened once he is gone and she is in charge!

    I hope so…

  19. #19
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:44 am, vickisoup said:

    Thanks, pyhtboss, for concisely illustraing the point that I was going to make: Slamming the GOP ticket right now, when the election hangs on every single vote, could prove regrettable.
    :shock:
    I deeply respect Michelle and am grateful for the good work she does keeping these critical issues well-investigated and at the forefront of our discourse. I value this website tremendously.
    I definitely don’t think we should carry the GOP water in a hypocritical way, but neither do I think poisoning the well at this extremely crucial time is a good idea. Yes, Palin and Mac differ on ANWR; but there are no ANWRians whose votes we need to keep BHO out of the White House.
    Sarah Palin’s talking points from the stump should be taken for what they are.
    I’m off to do *damage control* to mop up behind this post with some friends who would be swayed away.

  20. #20
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:44 am, walterc said:

    We are in a fight for the very survival of our nation and if OB wins the White House, shamnesty will be the least of our problems.

    Let’s just get McCain elected and then worry about shamnesty.

    Keep your eye on the prize.

  21. #21
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:45 am, ajmontana said:

    Can we move beyond this and focus on NObama 08′

    We hate it…. deal with it later.

    just my opinion.

  22. #22
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:46 am, Valiant said:

    Not a peep from Laura Ingraham on this (after she assured us Palin was on our side yet failed to bring up the subject in her interview).

    Also, judging by the number of trackbacks the conservative blogosphere has its head in the sand.

    Thanks Michelle for holding principle above politics.

  23. #23
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:48 am, DBNinKY said:

    I deeply respect Michelle and am grateful for the good work she does keeping these critical issues well-investigated and at the forefront of our discourse. I value this website tremendously.

    Well said, Vicki S!

    If not for MM and a select few others in the blogosphere, Obama probably would be an additional 3-4 points ahead in the polls.

  24. #24
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:48 am, Socky said:

    I am still willing to join Sarah’s Army, but if I ever got a few minutes to talk to her, I’d give her an earful on this.

  25. #25
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:50 am, ajmontana said:

    Posted before reading comments but it seems my views are shared….

    We need to fight the other direction. N.O.W.

    It’s Killin em and
    I Love it!!!

    McCain/Palin 08′

  26. #26
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:50 am, Truesoldier said:

    Somehow I dont think they have too much of a problem with illegal immigration in Alaska.

  27. #27
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:51 am, rooster said:

    nyk said
    He’s not “my boy.” Next you’ll be saying I “palled around” with him, a man I’ve never met or seen. Please.

    I’m sure that you and mj will be happy that your boy (little mr. & mrs. I hate America) is endorsing rev Wright and odumbo’s view of America and the majority of her people.

    http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/31644_Ayers_New_Book-_America_is_a_White_Supremacist_Nation#rss

  28. #28
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:53 am, Irish Rose said:

    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:44 am, walterc said:
    We are in a fight for the very survival of our nation and if OB wins the White House, shamnesty will be the least of our problems.

    Let’s just get McCain elected and then worry about shamnesty.

    Keep your eye on the prize.

    #21On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:45 am, ajmontana said:
    Can we move beyond this and focus on NObama 08′

    We hate it…. deal with it later.

    just my opinion.

    I third.

    For crying out loud, Michelle… we’re less than two weeks out of the election.

    Can you let up on the constant, dripping, hostile negativity for even ONE DAY?

    You just can’t do it, can you?

  29. #29
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:53 am, malkin_fan said:

    And they wonder why they are 10 points behind Obuma.

    F.U. McCain and a double F.U. to hernandez.

    Adios America.

  30. #30
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:54 am, crashemt said:

    In the past McCain had said several times, we can’t bus 12 million people back to Mexico.

    I like the enforcement idea, but 12 million won’t make a dent, when the actual number is closer to 80 million illegal immigrants.

    But hey, look at it this way…

    ..If Obama wins, we’ll have our first African-American Illegal Alien President.

    Still waitin’ on that birth certificate, Senator!

  31. #31
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:00 am, Valiant said:

    Keep your eye on the prize.

    What prize? There is lots of talk about how horrible a BHO presidency would be, but not a peep on how good a McCain/Palin presidency would be. I need something to vote for!

  32. #32
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:06 am, Bhishma said:

    Stay away from Juan Hernandez. He is not your friend. He is not a friend of “real America.”

    .. by the same token, nor is John McCain (sorry to break GOP hearts but McCain is Teddy running for office).

  33. #33
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:07 am, steveegg said:

    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:00 am, Valiant said:

    What prize? There is lots of talk about how horrible a BHO presidency would be, but not a peep on how good a McCain/Palin presidency would be. I need something to vote for!

    Good, bad; we’re the guys with the guns (you set me up so well), and we won’t be with an Obama Presidency.

  34. #34
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:08 am, steveegg said:

    Is it too late to get the Malkin/See-Dubya write-in campaign launched?

  35. #35
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:08 am, Bhishma said:

    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:54 am, crashemt said:

    But hey, look at it this way…

    ..If Obama wins, we’ll have our first African-American Illegal Alien President.

    Excellent point! For which, ofcourse have to thank their present POTUS (a job POTUS won’t do!)

  36. #36
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:08 am, DaveC said:

    .. and my morning was going so well..

    we’re screwed, 08

    that’s about all I can say.

  37. #37
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:09 am, thirteen28 said:

    Sarah’s smart. We’ll get her around to our way of thinking.

  38. #38
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:09 am, Valiant said:

    Good, bad; we’re the guys with the guns (you set me up so well), and we won’t be with an Obama Presidency.

    Out of my cold dead hands. Live free or die! Do you forget where America sprang from?

  39. #39
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:11 am, BKennedy said:

    What prize? There is lots of talk about how horrible a BHO presidency would be, but not a peep on how good a McCain/Palin presidency would be. I need something to vote for!

    Palin 2012
    Portable PRIVATE Health Care (As opposed to Obamunism)
    Rational Energy Policy
    Originalist Justices

    The beautiful thing about McCain is that we already know where he is a squish. He actually has some level of rational policy and experience. And then there’s Obama, who is NARAL/NAMBLA on domestic policy and Carter/JFK on Foreign Policy.

  40. #40
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:11 am, wighttrasch said:

    a man I’ve never met or seen.

    yet you have nothing bad to say about him…

  41. #41
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:11 am, Lindsay said:

    This one issue has been debated and discussed before. Most Americans are against amenesty and told Congress that loud and clear.

    There is a time for everything—except under an Obama administration. This is last years news, sorry, and before the threat of Obama and a Democratic Congress. McCain is not the perfect candidate but the alternative is much, much worse.

    The issue before us— that weighs heavier—is SOCIALISM under Barack Hussein Obama. Stop whining and get up and vote.

    Please see the forest and not just the tree (amnesty).Or, another saying, please fish or cut bait.

    We have more room and a voice to fight this under McCain than Obama.

  42. #42
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:16 am, brad_sk said:

    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:39 am, Mookie said: at 17

    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:37 am, DagneyT said:

    Palin has to “mimic” McCain’s stand points, until after the election. She cannot be seen to buck her boss.

    She’s bucked him on a lot of things already. ANWR, gay marriage, abortion, stem cell research, campaigning in Michigan, etc.

    Very true..So is she really bucking or is that her true thoughts or she just doesn’t have enough knowledge to make her own decision?

  43. #43
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:18 am, md1964 said:

    I guess McCain/Palin are glad I already voted early… I did it becasue I knew something ignorant from that campaign was going to come out, before Nov 4th that makes me want to stay home.

  44. #44
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:18 am, walterc said:

    Valiant said:

    Keep your eye on the prize.

    What prize? There is lots of talk about how horrible a BHO presidency would be, but not a peep on how good a McCain/Palin presidency would be. I need something to vote for!

    I hate to say it, but in order to avoid a Pelosi/Obama/Reid (POR economy) trifecta turning our country into a socialist disaster, we HAVE to vote McCain. As sad as that is, it’s what we have. On the upside, he will only be in office for 4 years and can do a lot less damage than the POR crowd.

    When Sarah steps up in 2012, we can get back on a conservative track.

    The damage that would be caused by the POR crowd in 4 years would take decades if ever to undo.

  45. #45
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:18 am, PBoilermaker said:

    I agree with vickisoup…this is akin to a conservative voter suppression tactic.

    None of us forgets where McCain stands on illegal immigration and it is something we will have to fight him on if he is elected. I’d rather fight McCain/Palin on amnesty than Obama/Biden on the removal of basic freedoms and rampant socialism.

    We don’t need McCain/Palin hit pieces from well known conservatives two weeks out.

  46. #46
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:21 am, John Deaux said:

    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:00 am, Valiant said:
    Keep your eye on the prize.
    What prize? There is lots of talk about how horrible a BHO presidency would be, but not a peep on how good a McCain/Palin presidency would be. I need something to vote for!

    Thank you for bringing the Obama view here. This is their selling point for the weak minded. If you vote for Obama, you’re voting FOR something, with that something being change. With McCain being the opposite of Obama, you must be voting for the opposite of change, or more of the same. In reality, by voting for McCain you’re not voting FOR anything, just to prevent things like capitulation, income redistribution, spreading the wealth, lower defense spending, new social programs, indoctrination of our children.

  47. #47
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:22 am, Lindsay said:

    aj and Irish Rose: ditto. Could not agree more strongly. We can fight against amnesty and other things later.

    The time is now to fight for McCain/Palin without going wobbly or negative or whiney. Good grief, look at what our founding fathers faced, or our parents in WW2. I do not want socialism or a president with the background of Barack Hussein Obama. That is enough to focus on right now.

    The time for optimism is now, in the face of the mainstream media’s constant barrage of negativity—this is nothing new as it occured in 2000 and in 2004 and,uh, I believe GW Bush won against the odds.

    By the way, we are NOT screwed if you can get out of your fetal positions and fight. Don’t read the polls, they mean nothing. Don’t read negative spin, as the message is to feel defeated.

    McCain/Palin ’08!!!

  48. #48
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:25 am, iamsaved said:

    brad_sk said:
    “Very true..So is she really bucking or is that her true thoughts or she just doesn’t have enough knowledge to make her own decision?”

    She won’t be able to make that decision. Congress and the President will. My guess is she has as much knowledge as any one of us on the subject. She’s not at liberty to voice it publicly since every statement by her will have consequences – i.e Joe Biden. She may agree with us or she may not but no matter what she says, nothing can be done and she will only alienate those who don’t agree with her.

    Better to pick her battles.

  49. #49
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:25 am, PBoilermaker said:

    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:22 am, Lindsay said:
    By the way, we are NOT screwed if you can get out of your fetal positions and fight. Don’t read the polls, they mean nothing. Don’t read negative spin, as the message is to feel defeated.

    Bingo.

  50. #50
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:27 am, Valiant said:

    When Sarah steps up in 2012, we can get back on a conservative track.

    She is already “growing” and she’s not even in Washington yet. We need an incorruptible ideologue for this job and Palin has demonstrated once again that she isn’t it.

    I was really hoping she would out-maverick the Maverick from the right. It can’t be that hard.

  51. #51
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:28 am, Jaded said:

    Michelle 12 days….please give it a rest….I like you fought hard against AMNESTY and we can do it again BUT we cannot with an Obama/Reid/Pelosi cartel…..please just 12 days.

  52. #52
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:29 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    Mookie said:

    What surprised me the most about this is that it took a reporter from Univision to ask her about immigration with less than two weeks to go before the election. You’d think it would have come up in an interview with one of our MSM people before now.

    Mookie… the MSM supports Amnesty. To ask her about it and risk an “I support it” answer, would be considered a softball question. The MSM only wants to attack Sarah, not shed any kind of positive light on her. Or in this case, what the MSM considers a positive light. Clearly, conservatives do not consider this as anything but bad policy. As do most Americans.

    She needs to find her own voice on this.

  53. #53
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:31 am, ajmontana said:

    Breaking News from ABCNEWS.com:

    Elisabeth Hasselbeck of ‘The View’ Invited by Sarah Palin to Appear at Two Weekend Rallies

  54. #54
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:33 am, PBoilermaker said:

    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:31 am, ajmontana said:
    Breaking News from ABCNEWS.com:

    Elisabeth Hasselbeck of ‘The View’ Invited by Sarah Palin to Appear at Two Weekend Rallies

    Hasselbeck is a tool.

  55. #55
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:38 am, hawkeye54 said:

    What prize? There is lots of talk about how horrible a BHO presidency would be, but not a peep on how good a McCain/Palin presidency would be. I need something to vote for!

    How about freedom of speech and right to bear arms?

    How long before Obummer, Pelousy and Dingy Harry attempt to shut down alternate media sites like these and work for taking away guns and ammo from law abiding citizens?

    That’s enough for me. We already know McCain/Palin would be better by leaps and bounds than Obama/Biden.

    We have a better shot at influencing McCain on illegal immigration issues than we would with Obummer and his Democrat controlled CONgress.

  56. #56
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:39 am, an-artist said:

    Look, I am not pleased with McCain’s position on illegal immigration. But folks, we do have a choice to make here, and McCain is more persuadable on this issue than Barack Obama will ever be. Please remember that Obama wants to give drivers licenses to illegals.

    I am frankly shocked at people saying that Palin’s immigration response is a deal-breaker. Have we forgotten all we have learned about Obama in the past year? His radical associations? His stance on ABORTION? His apparent ties with a voter fraud organization?

    If your temper tantrum over immigration puts Obama in the White House, then you will have no place to whine and moan when Obama installs his socialist policies and appoints extreme liberal judges to the supreme court. In fact, you may not even be allowed to whine and moan, when Obama signs the Fairness Doctrine back into law.

    It’s disappointing we have to make a choice between the lesser of two evils. But Obama is far more dangerous to our country than McCain is. Put it into perspective before you decide to sit it out and allow Obama to run this country into the ground.

  57. #57
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:41 am, RabbidSquirrel said:

    When/If Palin becomes one of those ‘inside the beltway’ she’s done for.

    I had high hopes for Kay Bailey Hutchison back in the day also.

  58. #58
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:42 am, PhredE said:

    Just a casual reminder…

    That although whomever is elected as Prez in 2 weeks does play an important role in deciding/enforcing immigration law, ultimately Congress is the real ‘firewall’. Either Obama or McCain will both need to lobby and persuade Congress (especially the House) to pass legislation to grant shamnesty to illegals.

    For this reason alone, a vote for McCain would help setup the scenario where Executive (Presidency) is run by Reps, and the Congress controlled by Dems. Having Obama in the Executive cooperating with a Dem-run Congress, would make any looming amnesty all the easier to push through.

    As a bit of a side, one angle to work McCain on this issue should he prevail – is on the fiscal impacts of said amnesty legislation. Most scholars agree that amnesty ultimately imposes great costs upon the American taxpayer/worker.

    Having said the above, “we” have stopped amnesty before – even with the support of Bush combined with much – but not all – of Congress. Bottom line: work to ensure that your US House and US Senate elected critters are against amnesty and will vote that way at crunch time.

    … Stop amnesty? Yes we can.

  59. #59
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:42 am, Valiant said:

    We have a better shot at influencing McCain on illegal immigration issues than we would with Obummer and his Democrat controlled CONgress.

    I disagree. McCain will want an early win with his Democrat Congress and this will be the first ring he will reach for. Obama’s agenda of taking our guns and shutting us up will have priority over amnesty.

    Having said that, neither of the Marx Brothers Obama/McCain are fetting my vote.

  60. #60
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:46 am, powerpro said:

    OH FOR GOD’S SAKE!

    It’s either imperfect candidates…

    OR A MARXIST.

    We need to have our heads on straight and keep our eyes on the ball here.

    Which of the two candidates do you think we’ll have more sway with on this issue? The imperfect one, or the Marxist???

    I love you Michelle, but JEEZ.

  61. #61
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:48 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Who was the only Presidential Candidate to commit in writing to Senator Jeff Sessions’ 15 point action plan to restore law and order to America’s broken immigration system?

    Answer.

  62. #62
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:48 am, Lindsay said:

    valiant, you should change your name to something else. It is not valor to stay home, not vote for McCain/Palin, and allow socialism to creep in to the USA.Oh, yeah, you will show them!

    You should change your screen name to Weakneed.

    You are like a dog chasing his tail.

    I would imagine McCain will have more serious business to attend to than starting an uproar with the conservative base first thing in February. Biden says something big is coming, and I don’t think it involves amnesty.

  63. #63
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:49 am, RabbidSquirrel said:

    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:38 am, DBNinKY said:

    Does it not exist within the realm of possibilities that Obama was Ayers protege, with the same radical leanings and points of view? I think it does, and I am not alone.

    Whats funny about this is that Ayers is supposedly against White Supremacy… BUT

    He skillfully manipulated a ‘black man’ into becoming his public face and doing EXACTLY what he (Ayers) wanted to him to do.

    Well played BILLY!!!

  64. #64
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:50 am, Lindsay said:

    Amen, Jaded #50. Thank you.

  65. #65
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:51 am, ajmontana said:

    Hasselbeck is a tool.

    At least shes on our side. with all the real tools out there she’s way far down on the tool list, + her bro in law is my QB…. even if the season is toast. :( I like her.

  66. #66
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:52 am, an-artist said:

    Also, I am frustrated with our side cannibalizing our own.

    Do we want to win this thing or not?

    I look at what the RNC has done to Michelle Bachmann and it’s just a disgrace. Are we going to do the same now to Sarah Palin because she didn’t tell a Spanish-speaking station she wants to deport all the Mexicans?

    Do we have a death wish? Seriously. We are standing on the precipice of being governed by the most far-left group in history. Pelosi-Reed-Obama. That scares me more than anything.

    Sorry for the rant, but geez.

  67. #67
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:54 am, PhredE said:

    ITooktheRedPill (#60)

    Jeff Sessions: Probably the best senator on immigration-related policy :D :wink:

  68. #68
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:55 am, Valiant said:

    #61.

    I am voting for a conservative. I do not have to choose between two Marxists. Gutless is toeing the party line, comrade.

  69. #69
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:56 am, PBoilermaker said:

    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:51 am, ajmontana said:
    At least shes on our side.

    That’s my point…I don’t really think she is. Then again, perhaps it only appears that she is on the wrong side since she is too weak to stand up for conservative principles during her day job.

    Nothing personal AJ. I’m just not impressed with her at all.

  70. #70
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:59 am, rightisright said:

    Very disheartening to see her words from the interview…could be towing the McAmnesty line for the races sake, maybe that was really her…gads I hope not.
    I feel I have no choice but to vote LOTE’s again(damn Bush), as it’s been said we need to stop O bummer and gang.
    Hypothetical, say McShame wins, does not run in ’12, of course Plain does. Best she change her stance on illegals or she’ll not be receiving my vote, unless of course the Zero is running again or Hitlery. At that time if a Jindal comes to the forefront as a anti-illegal alien candidate he’ll get the votes over Palin. I say that knowing I have much appreciation and respect for Palin, but…

  71. #71
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:59 am, PBoilermaker said:

    We are standing on the precipice of being governed by the most far-left group in history. Pelosi-Reed-Obama.

    A conservative that isn’t horrified by this prospect must not have a pulse.

  72. #72
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:59 am, Rob said:

    TROJAN HORSE!

  73. #73
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:01 pm, pyhtboss said:

    If your temper tantrum over immigration puts Obama in the White House, then you will have no place to whine and moan when Obama installs his socialist policies and appoints extreme liberal judges to the supreme court.

    Try walking through my neighborhood and then talk about a “temper tantrum over immigration”. Don’t forget to wear your MS-13 colors and kevlar vest

    As far as Obama’s “socialist poliices,” McCain actually suspended his campaign to help push through the bailout. Or is that only Socialism when Obama supports it?

    Judges… let’s see… who lead the Gang of 14… and complained about Alito before mysteriously changing his mind during the campaign. Which one is the stealth candidate again?

  74. #74
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:04 pm, By Choice said:

    There seems to be a general consensus that a Demoncrat House/Senate is a given but I’m not so sure. After the bailout debacle with elected officials voting AGAINST the public will they should all be sent packing–especially with a 9% approval rating. Do NOT vote for an incumbent!!!!

    If they are re-elected then we, the people, will more than get the government we deserve. The firestorm of laws and rules that will be coming with an Obama administration will make “sham-nasty” look like a picnic. It will be drivers licenses for illegal,illegal voter fraud, and 100 million more illegals in 20 years!!!

    Hold your nose if you have to and vote for McCain/Palin.

  75. #75
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:05 pm, Lindsay said:

    I am far, far from gutless. I am a realist.

    I have not toed the party line as I have supported Thompson and Romney and fought hard against amnesty.

    But I know what we face by not electing McCain and Palin.

    Prove, with links, that McCain is Marxist like his opponent. Prove your big talk or find another blog to blab on.

    Your vote for anyone other than McCain/Palin is meaningless in this election against what we face. Sorry, but it is true. I have nothing further to say to you, unless you can provide links in which McCain is Marxist. I have to go, so if you find these links I will answer to you, weakneed, later.

  76. #76
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:06 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Having said that, neither of the Marx Brothers Obama/McCain are fetting my vote.

    Well, by all means vote for the whomever you wish and enjoy the next 4 + years of marxist rule under the Obummer.

    As I said, at least we (and Palin, who may have been reluctant to tow the McCain line here) have the possibilty of influencing McCain who is no marxist.

    I’m sure Obummer will be all ears to our conservative issues. Well, all ears, but not to our issues.

  77. #77
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:06 pm, Rob said:

    Try walking through my neighborhood and then talk about a “temper tantrum over immigration”. Don’t forget to wear your MS-13 colors and kevlar vest

    You can drive three miles down the main drag from my home in Southern Cali and not see one white person. The signs are all in mexican or asian. The times they are a changin’.

  78. #78
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:07 pm, America1st said:

    Illegal Immigration, Juan Hernandez and McCain’s BS on this issue is MY HOT BUTTON ISSUE!

    But I trust Sarah’s character and she has to get in office first to be able to do us any good.

    Does it burn to hear her mouth that tripe? You betcha (sarah speak = )

  79. #79
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:08 pm, powerpro said:

    Dear Undecided…Are You Kidding Me?

    Here’s a great segment:

    Two VERY Different Candidates

    ▪ One candidate is well-known for his brutal honesty, often at the expense of his own political career. The other is now well-known for his laundry list of overt self-serving lies.

    ▪ One is a true American war hero and respected patriot. The other has never served anyone but himself.

    ▪ One has a long life of well balanced experience. The other has a completely blank résumé.

    ▪ One is proud to talk about his life and his associations over many years. The other is running away from his past and all of his life associations.

    ▪ One is trying to sell American principles of “freedom” to voters. The other is trying to sell anti-American principles of “free-stuff” to voters.

    When placed in these simple terms which should be obvious to any honest American seeking to accurately assess these two candidates, how can anyone be undecided at this late hour?

    Please people. Don’t throw your vote away.

    The stakes are too high!

  80. #80
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:10 pm, pueblo1032 said:

    Boy, is ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION the new 3rd RAIL in this country… NOBODY wants to touch it… It has died in MSM… Not present at any of the DEBATES… Virtually has died, even in my local PRO ILLEGAL RAG… The only mention of late, THE WASHINGTON TIMES… Pretty sad when to get news on ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, and you live in Phoenix, you have to got to WASHINGTON TIMES… A lot of talk lately about THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE… Well just remember it wasn’t just the DEMS trying to stifle debate in the SHAMNESTY BILL… There were a WHOLE LOT of REPUBLICANS who wanted the VOICES of the PEOPLE silenced… I know I am not going to forget!!!

  81. #81
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:10 pm, Paul-Cincy said:

    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:31 am, ajmontana said:
    Breaking News from ABCNEWS.com:

    Elisabeth Hasselbeck of ‘The View’ Invited by Sarah Palin to Appear at Two Weekend Rallies

    I was at McCain/Palin rally last night. About 60 feet from the podium. Crowd of maybe 10,000? Palin was the big draw. A few local speakers beforehand, they were weak! Lacked enthusiasm. No other celebrities. Understand Lee Greenwood was there but I guess I missed him! It was McCain/Palin and their spouses. Rob Portman introduced them. Cindy spoke first. Sarah is just so good. Lots of energy. McCain gave it a shot. He did pretty well. He has a good ending with his “fight” stuff and “we can make history”, like at the end of his convention speech, but his timing was off so the audience kept stepping on his best lines. It was ok. Standing for 4 hours. My legs are tired.

    Palin is smart getting a celebrity like EH with appeal and energy involved. Very smart. She’s doing everything she can to make it work. Yes, McCain did say Obama would do anything to win. Said he just changed his position on his tax cut for 95%. Included a work requirement. A change so close to the election, that’s why McCain said he’d say anything to win.

  82. #82
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:11 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Obama must go down in flames. This “experiment” by the DNC cannot be rewarded. I realize that the RNC has resorted to an experiment of their own; however, the crucial difference here is that they can possibly learn from their mistakes. We can send all of the messages we need to to get things back on track once we clear this hurdle. First and foremost – is stopping the empty suit with ties to all sorts of radicals, terrorists, etc.

  83. #83
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:16 pm, an-artist said:

    Try walking through my neighborhood and then talk about a “temper tantrum over immigration”. Don’t forget to wear your MS-13 colors and kevlar vest

    I live in North Denver. 60% of the people who are my neighbors are Hispanic, and the area is a haven for illegal immigrants and Mexican gangs. I realize illegal immmigration is a problem, and McCain has a less than savory solution to that problem. But overall, McCain will do less damage to the USA than Obama will. I disagree with McCain on several issues but I am not willing to take a flier on Obama just because McCain is not my perfect candidate, or because he’s not the guy I voted for in the primary.

    I am not here to say that McCain is a conservative because he is not. But please, put it into perspective. Obama is a masked Marxist who will have a far-left Congress waiting to rubber stamp every proposal he makes. Abortion. Second Amendment. Fairness Doctrine. Supreme Court justices. Economic and Foreign policy. I could go on and on and on. The damage Obama could do to this country could take a generation to undo.

    This is the card we have been dealt. We have to choose between a RINO and a Marxist. I am not going to put a Marxist in the White House.

  84. #84
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:19 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    You can drive three miles down the main drag from my home in Southern Cali and not see one white person. The signs are all in mexican or asian. The times they are a changin’ have changed.

    Not for the better. Obummer, Pelousy and Dingy Harry will just finish off the USA as we know it, making the whole country another 3rd world mess with the elite on top ruling all us helpless, mindless peons. That is, after we conservatives have been eliminated or assimilated.

    Better stock up on ammo and food if you plan on resitance.

  85. #85
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:21 pm, memyselfandi said:

    Dang – what is wrong with people? If you are serious about protecting our borders, then you must also be serious about making sure that people have the right documents to work. And if you do, the illegals that are here won’t be able to work, and then must self-deport. Why is that so hard to stomach?

  86. #86
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:22 pm, Southpaw said:

    Time for John McCain and Sarah Palin to pick up the newspapers and do a reality check:

    The FBI has just make big raids on the MS13 drug gang in the Bay Area and the Mongols motorcycle gang in Southern California. The Mongols motorcycle gang were actively recruiting Mexican street gang members in L.A. to expand their drug operations.

    Much of the drug activity out west including methamphetamine and cocaine) is now under the control of the Mexican Mafia, including members within the U.S. prison system.

    There is an insidious decay eating at the core of our American way of life that is occuring within our own borders. It is rapidly becoming as big a threat as Al Queda.

  87. #87
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:35 pm, vickisoup said:

    I’d rather fight McCain/Palin on amnesty than Obama/Biden on the removal of basic freedoms and rampant socialism.

    Amen, PB.

  88. #88
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:35 pm, Solo said:

    #74
    McCain-Kennedy
    McCain-Feingold
    McCain-Lieberman
    The Gang of 14
    Supported the pork laden socialist bailout.
    Against the Bush tax cuts.
    Was against drilling in anwr when the republicans had control of congress. The list goes on & on.

    Reach across the isle is nothing more than a liberal in conservative clothing.

  89. #89
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:41 pm, riggword said:

    For all of the talk about Illegal immigrants and McCain’s plan.

    Obama may just have the answer to the illegals problem if he wins and can enact his
    “World Wide Welfare Plan Will Stop Illegal Immigration”

  90. #90
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:42 pm, rightisright said:

    The damage Obama could do to this country could take a generation to undo.

    I see this all the time, and I agree to an extent, what makes you people honestly think after a totally controlled W.H. and Congress for years to come, it will be possible to change or regain any type of conservatism in this great country, without the use a well armed militia.

    The U.S.A. is known as a ‘melting pot’..with the current illegal alien invasion and a left wing Marxist congress, led by Obummer/Piglousy/Hairball it soon will be a ‘piss pot’.

  91. #91
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:45 pm, vickisoup said:

    On October 23rd, 2008 at 11:55 am, Valiant said:
    #61.

    I am voting for a conservative. I do not have to choose between two Marxists. Gutless is toeing the party line, comrade.

    This is serious business, Valiant. Only a fool would stand so proud of himself while everyone suffers as our taxes go through the roof and we lose our freedom of speech under this unabashed socialist/Marxist regime promised by Obama.
    Your arrogance and self-righteousness aren’t gonna keep you out of the poorhouse, but that’s all you’ll have left.

  92. #92
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:46 pm, dan708 said:

    You get the feeling that if only McCain had renounced his devotion to The Race before the start of his presidential campaign, he would be leading in ALL of the swing states and would be well ahead in most national polls.
    Ready, Aim, Fire-at-Foot!

  93. #93
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:46 pm, ajmontana said:

    Nothing personal AJ. I’m just not impressed with her at all.

    hey no prob pb, i’ve seen her in different evirons and shes pretty cool, hopefully she will bring some spunk and voters with her… one can hope. peace brother.

  94. #94
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:49 pm, Flyoverman said:

    The points expressed about McCain and immigration are all valid. I disagree with his positions as well. They stink.

    You have, howver, a stark choice. Palin publically as the VP has to endorse the head of the ticket’s position. What is said at the table internally is a different matter. I have every confidence she will represent our position at the table.

    So who’s going to be at the table if Obama is elected? La Raza and ACORN for sure. The border will become tissue paper as all of those Democrat voters stream across.

    Being an idealist at this stage is not a course of action I would recommend.

  95. #95
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:53 pm, Flyoverman said:

    With Obama you get a can of worms.

    Remember the old axiom. If you open and can of worms and want to put them back, you are going to need a bigger can.

  96. #96
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:54 pm, Rob said:

    So who’s going to be at the table if Obama is elected? La Raza and ACORN for sure. The border will become tissue paper as all of those Democrat voters stream across.

    The same thing with McAmnesty, but I just keep hoping… Trojan Horse.

  97. #97
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 12:57 pm, bjc said:

    Press 1 for ENGLISH; Press 2 for DEPORTATION; “22222222222222222″ & 20 million more; Any form of amnesty is advocating for illegal immigration; Any form of amnesty given guarantees more illegal immigration; End of story; End of USA; Got that McCain/Palin?

  98. #98
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 1:21 pm, rambler said:

    This economy will do more to curb illegal immigration as well as legal immigration. No jobs means no money. I am the only person on my street who doesn’t have a landscaping crew cut the grass. There used to be 7 different companies cutting the grass. Now there are 2 who split the work. I’m seeing the “hispanic only” stores closing. Can’t give amnesty to people who are not here. If Obama gets in, there will be even fewer jobs for illegals.

  99. #99
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 1:29 pm, flenser said:

    On October 23rd, 2008 at 10:23 am, nyk said:

    Maybe McCain will introduce Sarah to his socialist economic policies as well.

    Now you think that socialist economic policies are a bad thing? I’m having trouble keping up with your hypocritical flip-flopping.

  100. #100
    On October 23rd, 2008 at 1:36 pm, flenser said:

    Which of the two candidates do you think we’ll have more sway with on this issue? The imperfect one, or the Marxist???

    If you put it like that, the Marxist. The Marxist has not made amnesty the centerpiece of his domestic policy agenda. That would be McCain, who said recently that whether he is in the Senate or the WH next year, amnesty will be his top priority.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


More CPAC speeches in 20 words

February 11, 2012 06:53 PM by Michelle Malkin

72 Comments

Palin: If I Lived in South Carolina, I’d Vote for Newt

January 17, 2012 10:28 PM by Doug Powers

127 Comments

Endorsement?

‘Game Change’ Trailer

December 22, 2011 04:38 PM by Doug Powers

77 Comments

Brace for “from my house” reference

New Ad Airing in Iowa: Run, Sarah, Run

November 29, 2011 09:47 AM by Doug Powers

94 Comments

Too late?

Sarah Palin is out of 2012 race

October 5, 2011 06:26 PM by Michelle Malkin

107 Comments

Poll: Palin Picks Up Steam Against Obama

September 20, 2011 10:48 PM by Doug Powers

154 Comments

Sarah Palin’s Bus Tour Re-Launching in Iowa Thursday

August 11, 2011 12:01 AM by Doug Powers

342 Comments

Next stop, an announcement?


Categories: Amnesty,Sarah Palin

Redstate

» Media Matters
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook