Will the privacy champions come to Joe the Plumber’s defense?

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 25, 2008 11:29 AM

There is something in the water in Ohio.

They’ve got a fraud-friendly Secretary of State, infestations of out-of-state students and Obama workers sabotaging electoral integrity, and now…government employees or accomplices thereof rifling through the records of Joe the Plumber immediately after the last presidential debate.

You’ll remember that a national media uproar ensued after it was discovered that State Department contractors had snooped through Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John McCain’s passports. (Later, it turned out that the CEO of a company whose employee was involved in Passport-gate was a consultant to the Barack Obama campaign.)

Will the privacy champs come to Joe the Plumber’s defense?

The Columbus Dispatch reports:

Public records requested by The Dispatch disclose that information on Wurzelbacher’s driver’s license or his sport-utility vehicle was pulled from the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles database three times shortly after the debate.

Information on Wurzelbacher was accessed by accounts assigned to the office of Ohio Attorney General Nancy H. Rogers, the Cuyahoga County Child Support Enforcement Agency and the Toledo Police Department.

It has not been determined who checked on Wurzelbacher, or why. Direct access to driver’s license and vehicle registration information from BMV computers is restricted to legitimate law enforcement and government business.

The paper characterizes a McCain spokesman as “attemping to portray” the breach as “politically motivated.”

Geez Louise. Is there any other reason such a breach would take place immediately after Wurzelbacher was mentioned in a national presidential debate?

Of course it’s politically motivated. The question is not whether. The question is who.

The attorney general’s office is investigating if the access of Wuzelbacher’s BMV information through the office’s Ohio Law Enforcement Gateway computer system was unauthorized, said spokeswoman Jennifer Brindisi.

“We’re trying to pinpoint where it came from,” she said. The investigation could become “criminal in nature,” she said. Brindisi would not identify the account that pulled the information on Oct. 16.

Records show it was a “test account” assigned to the information technology section of the attorney general’s office, said Department of Public Safety spokesman Thomas Hunter.

Brindisi later said investigators have confirmed that Wurzelbacher’s information was not accessed within the attorney general’s office. She declined to provide details. The office’s test accounts are shared with and used by other law enforcement-related agencies, she said.

On Oct. 17, BMV information on Wurzelbacher was obtained through an account used by the Cuyahoga County Child Support Enforcement Agency in Cleveland, records show.

Mary Denihan, spokeswoman for the county agency, said the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services contacted the agency today and requested an investigation of the access to Wurzelbacher’s information. Cuyahoga County court records do not show any child-support cases involving Wurzelbacher.

The State Highway Patrol, which administers the Law Enforcement Automated Data System in Ohio, asked Toledo police to explain why it pulled BMV information on Wurzelbacher within 48 hours of the debate, Hunter said.

After the State Department passport fiasco, heads rolled. Obama spokesman Bill Burton raged: “Our government’s duty is to protect the private information of the American people, not use it for political purposes.”

Are plumbers who oppose socialism exempt?

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Joe The Plumber

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #101
    On October 25th, 2008 at 4:47 pm, watershed said:

    #100

    LOL!! You’re awesome.

  2. #102
    On October 25th, 2008 at 4:48 pm, watershed said:

    #100

    Did you get enough google time to find out what it was?

  3. #103
    On October 25th, 2008 at 4:52 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed you are still sniping.
    You keep responding with nothing.
    Core values?

  4. #104
    On October 25th, 2008 at 4:53 pm, watershed said:

    #103

    I literally answered your quiz, guy.

  5. #105
    On October 25th, 2008 at 4:54 pm, watershed said:
  6. #106
    On October 25th, 2008 at 4:56 pm, Omu said:

    You are a dreadful hypocrite, Ms. Malkin. Do you remember Graeme Frost and the horrible infringement on his privacy and that of his family’s?

  7. #107
    On October 25th, 2008 at 4:56 pm, brooklyn red said:

    well so much for original thought…

  8. #108
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:01 pm, watershed said:

    #106

    Exactly. Or the college kids from the Students Against War, the ones who’s adresses she put up publically so that they got death threats. Her statement?

    “my message is this: You are responsible for your individual actions. Other individuals are responsible for theirs. Grow up and take responsibility.”

    Wonder why they don’t get the same concern as Joe?

  9. #109
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:04 pm, watershed said:

    #108

    Whoops. That’s “publicly”. and “addresses”. Spell check please.

  10. #110
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:05 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On October 25th, 2008 at 2:35 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Dirty tricks and retribution are a fact of life. Weaklings worry and hide, the courageous prepare. Jimmy Carter sure did a job on General Singlaub-in 1944 he was a hero and in 1979 he was not. It can be “Hazardous Duty” doing the right thing.

    Thank you for that…I had never heard of General Singlaub. I know Wikipedia has a predominantly Left-Wing viewpoint, so what it says about him is interesting.

    Singlaub was founder in 1981 of the U.S. Council for World Freedom, the US chapter of the World Anti-Communist League (WACL).

    And that made him a prime target of the Communists. I believe that Carter was a Communist. Look at the Communist Goals from 1963 and look how many of those goals were furthered by Carter from 1977-1981.

    Privacy? That only applies to drug use, Birth Certificates and College transcripts of the far left. We hear of Cindy McCain’s problem repeatedly but BroBama’s use is off limits as RACIST.

    Exactly. We aren’t allowed to know about Obama’s life, but anyone who questions him is attacked viscously and there entire life history is made public.

    I can well imagine these very blogs are being entered into a politically correct data base.

    Yes. It’s called Google.

    Privacy? It is a violation of Federal Law to keep records of the FBI’s Instant Background Checks on firearms purchases. Janet Reno did it for eight years-but then she murdered Vicky Weaver without consequence also.

    And what about Waco? I don’t care how “Wacko” the people in Waco were, the government had no right to murder them.

    So prepare.

    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    We are. Prayer is my primary weapon (for both offense and defense), but if armed defense becomes necessary, my wife is an excellent shot with her Ruger, and I’m going to get my late grandfather’s Smith&Wesson out of storage.

  11. #111
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:07 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed
    Let me tell you about me.
    My wife and I have fought hard for 45 years for women’s rights, racial equality and rational environmental regulations. We were at the forefront of the Freedom of Information Act legislation and attempted to rein in governments intrusion into private lives where ever we found it.
    We did all this under the banner of the Republican party.

  12. #112
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:08 pm, nyc123me said:

    “You were the one who said that an invasion of privacy that is deliberately meant to intimidate doesn’t mean anything. ”

    Absolutely unbelievable. Again, you act like a liberal the fool and refuse to hear a single bit of reason. I would never want to be associated with the kind of blind ignorant rage, paranoia, and utter lack of reason or ‘common’ sense that goes on in liberal sites, but unfortunately it seems at times to be heading the same way here as the election gets closer. Time to distance myself. I suggest a certain one or two of you try taking a step back; you’ve already lowered your standards to their same bottom-feeding paranoid ignorant level.

  13. #113
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:08 pm, brooklyn red said:

    Graeme Frost? Oh yes, another poster child for picking my pocket…

  14. #114
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:10 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed said: You are responsible for your individual actions. Other individuals are responsible for theirs

    A Libertarian or an Anarchist?

  15. #115
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:11 pm, nyc123me said:

    btw, I never said what you claim above JHSII, you liberal freak. Typical liberal tactics though; misquotes out of context, make wild claims based on nothing and ignore the facts.. yeah, your a lib, you’re just too dumb to know it.

  16. #116
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:12 pm, brooklyn red said:

    watershed said: You are responsible for your individual actions. Other individuals are responsible for theirs

    Exactly! so get you spread the wealth agenda outta my face>

  17. #117
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:12 pm, nyc123me said:

    Nods FamilyMan, seems there’s a few lib trolls posing as Conservatives today. Guess they got a weekend pass from the asylum.

  18. #118
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:13 pm, watershed said:

    #111

    That’s great. An interesting mix there.

    Given your govt intrusion beliefs, what did you think about Terri Schiavo’s situation?

  19. #119
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:13 pm, FireBlogger said:

    M.O.A.T.

    The Office of the Messiah Opposition Assessment Team.

  20. #120
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:15 pm, watershed said:

    #114

    That’s what Malkin said. I doubt she’s either.

  21. #121
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:16 pm, JHSII said:

    nyc123me wrote:

    “You were the one who said that an invasion of privacy that is deliberately meant to intimidate doesn’t mean anything. ”

    Absolutely unbelievable. Again, you act like a liberal the fool and refuse to hear a single bit of reason. I would never want to be associated with the kind of blind ignorant rage, paranoia, and utter lack of reason or ‘common’ sense that goes on in liberal sites, but unfortunately it seems at times to be heading the same way here as the election gets closer. Time to distance myself. I suggest a certain one or two of you try taking a step back; you’ve already lowered your standards to their same bottom-feeding paranoid ignorant level.

    You’ve passed the point of projection and have become delusional. You can’t even respond to what I actually did say!

    I’m not the one with the problem. Maybe some medication would help you.

  22. #122
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:17 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    How can I get in on this venomous conversation? Hypocrites, jerks, and freaks all!

    There. That should cover it.

    civil, rational discourse

    Actually, most of the threads are starting to read like this. Show some class. Surprise me.

  23. #123
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:17 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Watershed you are still sniping.
    What have you done in your life?

  24. #124
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:18 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Ok, self-edit and correction:

    Singlaub was founder in 1981 of the U.S. Council for World Freedom, the US chapter of the World Anti-Communist League (WACL).

    And that made him a prime target of the Communists. I believe that Carter was a Communist. Look at the Communist Goals from 1963 and look how many of those goals were furthered by Carter from 1977-1981.

    Upon further review, it is evident that Carter relieved him of duty BEFORE he founded the US chapter of the World Anti-Communist League (WACL). The wikipedia explanation of the firing is:

    In 1977, while Singlaub was chief of staff of U.S. forces in South Korea, he publicly criticized President Jimmy Carter’s decision to withdraw U.S. troops from the Korean peninsula. On March 21, 1977, Carter relieved him of duty for overstepping his bounds and failing to respect the President’s authority as Commander-in-Chief.”.

    But the timing doesn’t change the truth about the character of both men.

    A review of Singlaub’s life and a review of Carter’s life reveals that the first is and was anti-Communist, and the second is and was pro-Communist.

    I wonder, if Obama were to become President, how many of our country’s best will be relieved of duty? For example, I would suspect that General Petraeus would be relieved of duty…

  25. #125
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:18 pm, JHSII said:

    nyc123me wrote:

    btw, I never said what you claim above JHSII, you liberal freak. Typical liberal tactics though; misquotes out of context, make wild claims based on nothing and ignore the facts.. yeah, your a lib, you’re just too dumb to know it.

    Definately projection here. I directly quoted you – and you say that you never said it.

    Any credibility you once had is now gone.

  26. #126
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:19 pm, nyc123me said:

    OMG read this Palin attack on CNN..

  27. #127
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:19 pm, nyc123me said:

    begone JHSII you liberal troll.

  28. #128
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:20 pm, brooklyn red said:

    watershed said:
    #111
    Given your govt intrusion beliefs, what did you think about Terri Schiavo’s

    Schiavo? so you were well you were well trained after all…

  29. #129
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:23 pm, nyc123me said:

    Ok JSHII, put your money where your fool mouth is. Show me exactly where I said, to use your ‘quote’ of my words,
    “an invasion of privacy that is deliberately meant to intimidate doesn’t mean anything”
    You lying sack of crap, I said no such thing and you know it. Why would I say say something so utterly ridiculous?
    Come on dork, show me.
    JSHII : LIBERAL TROLL.

  30. #130
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:24 pm, JHSII said:

    nyc123me wrote:

    begone JHSII you liberal troll.

    I’m a Conservative, nyc123me. I’m also not a troll.

    It’s exactly this kind of attack that cost you your credibility. Don’t make it any worse for yourself.

  31. #131
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:24 pm, brooklyn red said:

    nyc123me , humility is a virtue…

  32. #132
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:27 pm, JHSII said:

    and more attacks from nyc123me.

    I guess I struck a nerve with my comments.

  33. #133
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:28 pm, brooklyn red said:

    whatever…

  34. #134
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:28 pm, rooster said:

    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:24 pm, JHSII said:
    Any credibility you once had is now gone.

    No knucklehead, once a liberal is exposed all credibility is gone. Liberals lack any form of critical thinking, your ideology is based on feelings of fairness.

  35. #135
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:29 pm, nyc123me said:

    JHSII again, prove I said what you claim I said, YOU LIAR. And no I won’t be humble and accept these utter lies sorry B.Red and run away like I’ve done something wrong, why should I?

  36. #136
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:29 pm, b-cat said:

    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:05 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:
    Prayer is my primary weapon (for both offense and defense), but if armed defense becomes necessary, my wife is an excellent shot with her Ruger, and I’m going to get my late grandfather’s Smith&Wesson out of storage.

    Prayer is good, but for secondary weaponry I’d recommend a little more firepower, my friend.

  37. #137
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:31 pm, FamilyMan said:

    b-cat said: secondary weaponry I’d recommend a little more firepower, my friend.

    Be careful, you’ll frighten watershed.

  38. #138
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:32 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed.
    Any core values yet?
    HMMMM!!!!!

  39. #139
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:32 pm, nyc123me said:

    JHSII I’m waiting.. oh, your ‘direct quote’ of what I said doesn’t exist? Oh dear, what a surprise…
    JSHII : LIBERAL TROLL.

  40. #140
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:32 pm, watershed said:

    #123

    Not sure what answer, if any, will satisfy whatever you’re looking for, Familyman. You seem to have a pretty big target out on me, simply because of out different beliefs on a message board.

    I am a husband, a father, musician, a teacher, and an American. I believe that rather than “all you need is love”, I believe that “all you need is justice”, and a little love too can’t hurt.

    I come here and post because I can’t really believe that people actually support ANY of the actions that Malkin has perpetrated over the years, like spying on kids houses, realeasing students personal information so that could get death threats, and so forth, and so I come to get a sense of who the average Malkinite is. You seem to be a mostly pretty paranoid lot. There was a discussion of “post Obama election win concentration camps” just above that was pretty out there. And there are others.

    I also think sparring back and forth with some of you gives me some more insight into your mindset. And yes, I do like to debate politically as well.

    Hope any of that helps!

  41. #141
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:33 pm, JHSII said:

    Michelle Malkin:

    Geez Louise. Is there any other reason such a breach would take place immediately after Wurzelbacher was mentioned in a national presidential debate?

    Of course it’s politically motivated. The question is not whether. The question is who.

    This is exactly correct.

    It’s also interesting that no one was the slightest bit interested in this information before Joe the Plumber showed up in the national discourse. If it was that critical to those agencies that his records were pulled up three times, then why had their been no queries in the months previously? Why suddenly all at once – after he asked The One a question that The One didn’t like?

    Does anyone else remember the 900 FBI files found in the White House under the Clinton regime?

  42. #142
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:33 pm, brooklyn red said:

    nyc123me said:
    sorry B.Red and run away like I’ve done something wrong, why should I?

    No, your right… just keep spraying the bushes.

  43. #143
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:35 pm, JHSII said:

    more lies and attacks from nyc123me.

    Yawn.

    I am a Conservative.

    Oh yes, that’s for anyone who can think for themselves.

  44. #144
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:35 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed
    Thank you

  45. #145
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:38 pm, nyc123me said:

    heh, sorry BrooklynRed, but I (obviously) really get my back up when attacked by baldfaced liars like JSHII, and given some arrogant BS when I defend myself.

    JSHII still waiting..

  46. #146
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:39 pm, nyc123me said:

    JSHII you base your blatherings on something you claim I said, which I never did. I keep asking you to show me where I said what you claim, and you can’t.. how does that make me a liar? Explain yourself, troll.

  47. #147
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:40 pm, happyscrapper said:

    I left this thread for a while. Just returned to find trolls have definitely succeeded in their purpose of threadjacking. You fed them, didn’t you? That’s what happens. I am moving to another thread now. See you there.

  48. #148
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:40 pm, JHSII said:

    So, agreeing with Michelle Malkin on her own blog makes me a liberal troll. :roll:

    nyc123me has a problem – and it isn’t me.

    You can stop with the lies and attacks any time now, nyc123me.

  49. #149
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:40 pm, watershed said:

    #144

    Sure. Although I’m am positive you wont give ANYONE else on this board your little quiz. And gee, I wonder why?

  50. #150
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:44 pm, nyc123me said:

    Come on JSHII, why don’t you prove to everyone how right you are, what is so hard about that? All I’m asking you to do is prove I said what you say I did, which is the entire basis for your unprovoked attack on me in the first place because I pointed out some huge holes in this conspiracy theory.

    You can’t, because you’re a liar. Prove me wrong, come on, prove it.

  51. #151
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:45 pm, watershed said:

    I love the two total cons on this board calling each other lib troll. It’s awesome. This board is cuckoo!

  52. #152
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:45 pm, brooklyn red said:

    watercloset, you just ain’t winning any hearts & minds here…

  53. #153
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:48 pm, watershed said:

    3152

    You are a master of the facile.

  54. #154
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:48 pm, rooster said:

    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:45 pm, watershed said:
    I love the two total cons on this board calling each other lib troll. It’s awesome. This board is cuckoo!

    Then just leave waterhead!

  55. #155
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:48 pm, watershed said:

    Whoops. #152, I meant.

  56. #156
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:48 pm, watershed said:

    #154

    Nah. It’s too fun.

  57. #157
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:49 pm, JHSII said:

    More lies and attacks from nyc123me. He’s even trolled it over into another thread.

    Oh, for the record, I never put forth any kind of “conspiracy theory”.

    Again: My agreeing with Michelle Malkin on her own blog makes me a liberal troll. LMAO!!

  58. #158
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:50 pm, watershed said:

    #154

    Besides, I answered and passed Familyman’s “good american” quiz. And now I get to stay!

  59. #159
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:56 pm, nyc123me said:

    JSHII, you there? Still waiting…

    Just because I didn’t immediately agree with Michelle, and instead reasoned that there’s a possibility Joe’s records being viewed does not necessarily equate to some underhanded vast liberal conspiracy does not make me public enemy number one, at least not to anyone with some semblance of reason. I thought the only people who reacted like that were Obama cultists, but apparently Michelle has a few nutters of her own (namely you) following around like an embarrassing bad smell making stupid unfounded comments in their misguided zealous fervor, thinking that somehow it will endear them to Michelle.. Wait, I better translate that for you: you’re a fruit loop, buddy.

  60. #160
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:56 pm, sonofdy said:

    Just a taste of what is coming if obama the fraud wins.

  61. #161
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:56 pm, brooklyn red said:

    re: Besides, I answered and passed Familyman’s “good american” quiz.

    Actually, when you spell American with a lower case “A” well maybe not so much…

  62. #162
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:57 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed
    We all know each other. Most the regulars have been here a very long time. We don’t need to define ourselves.

  63. #163
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:57 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On October 25th, 2008 at 2:55 pm, Karen444 said:

    How is Joe going to feel a year from now if the attention is all gone?

    Two years from now, Joe will unseat the Democrat Representative who holds the U.S. House seat for his district.

  64. #164
    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:59 pm, JHSII said:

    You’re the one with the problem nyc123me, not me.

    Heck, I’m still waiting for you to respond to what I actually said in my original post.

    Come to think of it, why should I respond to your twisting of what I posted ever?

  65. #165
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:00 pm, nyc123me said:

    I’m still waiting for you to prove your claim JSHII, but all you can do is respond that I’m lying? Exactly what am I lying about JSHII? Come on, how many times do I have to challenge you, coward. Where did I make the statement that you claim I said? Come on, defend yourself you wimp.

  66. #166
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:00 pm, jangar said:

    I am Joe the Plumber.

    We are ALL Joe the Plumber.

    We are several million voices.

    We are the backbone of America

    …And we WILL NOT SHUT UP!

  67. #167
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:00 pm, JHSII said:

    brooklyn red #161:

    re: Besides, I answered and passed Familyman’s “good american” quiz.

    Actually, when you spell American with a lower case “A” well maybe not so much…

    LOL

  68. #168
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:01 pm, JHSII said:

    More attacks from nyc123me.

    Why does he expect me to respond to him when he can’t discuss something in an intelligent and mature manner?

  69. #169
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:01 pm, jangar said:

    Joe is Paul Revere.

  70. #170
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:01 pm, nyc123me said:

    I already responded idiot, and you then made a supposed direct quote of me, which doesn’t exist. LIAR.

    JSHII : LIBERAL TROLL.

    Prove me wrong.

  71. #171
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:02 pm, JHSII said:

    More attacks from nyc123me.

    I say again: Why does he expect me to respond to him when he can’t discuss something in an intelligent and mature manner?

  72. #172
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:03 pm, nyc123me said:

    Oh I see, daring to challenge anything you say = an attack. Gee that sounds awfully familiar JHSII – just like one of Obama’s cult followers.

    JSHII : LIBERAL TROLL.

  73. #173
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:03 pm, FamilyMan said:

    JHSII said:
    Why does he expect me to respond to him when he can’t discuss something in an intelligent and mature manner?

    Look how long it took me to get watershed to respond with a complete sentence.

  74. #174
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:04 pm, JHSII said:

    My agreeing with Michelle Malkin on her own blog makes me a liberal troll.

    Thanks nyc123me.

  75. #175
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:05 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On October 25th, 2008 at 3:03 pm, rooster said:

    And yet the lawsuit challenging “the one’s” elegibility is over, odumbo did not submit any evidence in support of his rights a citizen to run for the presidency…..completely ignored by the lsm.
    A little OT but’

    1. Does anyone else find it strange that Odumbo took about 3 days to finally leave to see his gravely ill granny (toot)?

    2 Does anyone find it strange that the “the one” said he doesn’t know if his granny is going to make it to election day?

    3. Does anyone find it strange that just yesterday “the bitter one”, MO told us that toot (granny) is going to be fine.

    5. Does anyone see it as strange that a loved one on her death bed is left in an obscure apartment (No hospital) to die alone without any other family than “the one” to come and pay any last respects?

    6. Does anyone find it strange that “the one’s” trip to Hawaii took place after the date he failed to produce proof of his citizenship in a legitimate court case against him?

    7. Do any of us find it strange that this is completely ignored by the lsm?

    Yes, it’s all more than a little odd.

    There is a very good reason why Obama is paying big money for lawyers to fight against his being forced to produce a certified birth certificate…

    His Kenyan grandmother says she was present at his birth…IN KENYA!

    Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court claiming that Obama is NOT Constitutionally eligible to be President of the United
    States!

  76. #176
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:07 pm, brooklyn red said:

    JHSII / nyc123me

    please consider swords or pistols… I recommend swords. Swords deprive the anti gun left of any (awww crap) ammunition, and provides a higher quality of entertainment to the rest of us… IMHO

  77. #177
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:07 pm, FamilyMan said:

    nyc123me and JHSII
    What are you two fighting about?
    He said she said….. You both lost me.

  78. #178
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:09 pm, nyc123me said:

    I say again: Why does he expect me to respond to him when he can’t discuss something in an intelligent and mature manner?

    Arrogant prat, go back and read your original unprovoked attack you cowardly POS, and then your comments making direct quotes of things I never wrote, and every time I request you to back anything up, you say I’m attacking you. Clearly you are a coward, unable to support ANY of your false claims, and revert to Obama cult tactics when directly challenged ion those same points.

    JSHII : LIBERAL TROLL.

    Ok, gotta go before I put my fist through the screen at my frustration with such a liberal closed-minded arrogant POS liberal a$$.

  79. #179
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:09 pm, Republicanvet said:

    I too would like to know where those who whined about the Patriot Act are? Those who sniveled about the FISA court continuously. The librarians who whined about Homeland Security. Those who wet their panties (and leaked to the Treason Times) the information about financially tracking terrorists.

    …those who have no problem with hacking into an email account, or using government systems to try dig up dirt on an average Joe American.

    Where are they?

    Which leads to another point. Biden made clear when begging recently that Obambi will be tested within 6 months. He insisted there would be a test, and begged the left to stand with them and support them even when their polls dropped, and even if it looked like things were not clear why they were doing something.

    I suspect when he and Obambi (and the McCain camp) received their recent transition briefing, he found out how serious the threat is, why the Patriot Act and other intelligence tools are useful, and why Obama and Biden will have to CONTINUE using those methods.

  80. #180
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:10 pm, fulldroolcup said:

    Michael Savage’s guess is Barack went to Hawaii to put a pillow over his ailing grandma’s face until she gave up embarrassing evidence about his past, such as old pics of a college-age Barack Hussein Obama thumping his forehead onto a prayer rug.

    That Michael Savage: he’s such a kidder!

  81. #181
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:11 pm, JHSII said:

    brooklyn red – I prefer swords too. I guess it comes from my AD&D 1e background ;-)

  82. #182
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:12 pm, JHSII said:

    More attacks from nyc123me.

    My agreeing with Michelle Malkin on her own blog makes me a liberal troll.

    Thanks nyc123me.

  83. #183
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:14 pm, FamilyMan said:

    brooklyn red said please consider swords or pistols

    I vote for naked clenched fists.

  84. #184
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:19 pm, rooster said:

    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:05 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:
    There is a very good reason why Obama is paying big money for lawyers to fight against his being forced to produce a certified birth certificate…

    His Kenyan grandmother says she was present at his birth…IN KENYA!

    Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court claiming that Obama is NOT Constitutionally eligible to be President of the United
    States!

    This is another example of what the judges will be like under odumbo…unfreakin’ believable!

  85. #185
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:26 pm, brooklyn red said:

    Dear Madame Hostess. While I exist here at your convenience & would myself never condone censorship, would you as a parent consider the option of a “time out”?

  86. #186
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:27 pm, nyc123me said:

    FamilyMan and whoever else, sorry, it started back with my comment #34, and then this prat JHSII ‘responded’ on comment #37 with an attack that said, and I quote,
    “the problem is you and people like you.
    I guess intimidation to anyone who dares to speak out or question the left is ok with you.”

    Of course I defended myself, contrary to the idiot’s claim that, and I quote,
    “I feel sorry for you, I really do. When you finally decide to speak out for yourself..”

    And then again another attack on #45 where the a$$ claimed, and I quote,
    “How dare anyone stand up to liberal intimidation when someone like you is there to provide cover for them”
    Yes, apparently my effort to take a less rabid view of the situation equated to providing cover for liberal intimidation. Are you even slightly surprised that I’m royally pi$$ed by such Obama-like tactics?

    And then in comment #58 this a$$clown claims, and I quote,
    “You were the one who said that an invasion of privacy that is deliberately meant to intimidate doesn’t mean anything”,
    and reiterated that in comment #125 by saying, and I quote,
    “I directly quoted you – and you say that you never said it.”

    Well I never did say it, and I have been calling him out for being a liar since or to prove otherwise, and this cowardly prat can only respond by saying I’m the liar, and I’m attacking him!

    Hell yes, I am angry at such arrogance and utter stupidity and incapability to support their own outrageous claims that is usually only exhibited by trolls like LGM, hence my conclusion that, JSHII : LIBERAL TROLL.

  87. #187
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:29 pm, nyc123me said:

    FamilyMna said: I vote for naked clenched fists.

    Yeah no problem here, I’ll go along with that. :)

  88. #188
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:29 pm, brooklyn red said:

    FamilyMan said:
    I vote for naked clenched fists.

    It may have a feel good effect
    but solves nothing :)

  89. #189
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:33 pm, nyc123me said:

    Must admit, JSHII has made a good job of distracting from the real issue, which is what Obama responded to Joe the Plumber; “spread the wealth”, which is clearly what the MSM and every lib troll on the net is trying to do.

  90. #190
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:34 pm, JHSII said:

    Another lie from nyc123me.

    My agreeing with Michelle Malkin on her own blog makes me a liberal troll.

    Thanks nyc123me.

  91. #191
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:36 pm, nyc123me said:

    Another lie from nyc123me

    which lie is that a$$hat? Come on coward, explain yourself.

  92. #192
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:36 pm, brooklyn red said:

    NO GROVELING! be it swords or be it pistols? Choose your seconds & prepare to assemble!

  93. #193
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:37 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Well at least we found out that watershed is a teacher. The security of an academic life allows a person to indulge a liberal theology.

  94. #194
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:38 pm, JHSII said:

    btw, the issue for this thread is:

    The paper characterizes a McCain spokesman as “attemping to portray” the breach as “politically motivated.”

    Geez Louise. Is there any other reason such a breach would take place immediately after Wurzelbacher was mentioned in a national presidential debate?

    Of course it’s politically motivated. The question is not whether. The question is who.

    After the State Department passport fiasco, heads rolled. Obama spokesman Bill Burton raged: “Our government’s duty is to protect the private information of the American people, not use it for political purposes.”

    Are plumbers who oppose socialism exempt?

    I guess now talking about the topic of the thread is a distraction in the thread itself. :roll:

  95. #195
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:39 pm, JHSII said:

    More personal attacks from nyc123me.

    My agreeing with Michelle Malkin on her own blog makes me a liberal troll.

    Thanks nyc123me.

  96. #196
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:40 pm, FamilyMan said:

    brooklyn red
    How about playing “chicken” with two very fast cars and no seat belts.

  97. #197
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:40 pm, nyc123me said:

    JHSII admits by default he is a liar, since he is unable to back up his claims. Thank you.

  98. #198
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:41 pm, JHSII said:

    Another lie from nyc123me. Can’t he think of anything new?

    My agreeing with Michelle Malkin on her own blog makes me a liberal troll.

    Thanks nyc123me.

  99. #199
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:42 pm, brooklyn red said:

    I guess now talking about the topic of the thread is a distraction in the thread itself.

    Too late! beit swords or pistols?

  100. #200
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:44 pm, nyc123me said:

    I opt for naked fists and steel-capped boots. :)

    Hey JHSII, why wont you answer anything I challenge you with? Is it because you can’t? Can’t say I’m a liar – I’m asking a question, not making a statement, so come on, I’m waiting..

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Ohio taxpayers paying to defend government snoops

November 18, 2009 09:27 AM by Michelle Malkin

14 Comments

In defense of Joe

January 14, 2009 07:23 PM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments

JTP in Sderot: “Do you think this is normal, the way you cover this conflict…?”

January 11, 2009 09:47 PM by Michelle Malkin

31 Comments

“He also observed and reported from the house where a Kassam landed on Sunday afternoon.”

“Is that an airplane or a helicopter?”

January 11, 2009 11:51 AM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments

“Professional” question of the morning.

Who’s afraid of Joe the Journalist?

January 9, 2009 08:38 AM by Michelle Malkin

199 Comments

Joe the Plumber heads to Israel

January 7, 2009 12:52 PM by Michelle Malkin

83 Comments


Categories: Joe The Plumber

Babalu Blog

» Greece is Burning

Betsys Page

» Cruising the Web
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook