Will the privacy champions come to Joe the Plumber’s defense?

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 25, 2008 11:29 AM

There is something in the water in Ohio.

They’ve got a fraud-friendly Secretary of State, infestations of out-of-state students and Obama workers sabotaging electoral integrity, and now…government employees or accomplices thereof rifling through the records of Joe the Plumber immediately after the last presidential debate.

You’ll remember that a national media uproar ensued after it was discovered that State Department contractors had snooped through Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John McCain’s passports. (Later, it turned out that the CEO of a company whose employee was involved in Passport-gate was a consultant to the Barack Obama campaign.)

Will the privacy champs come to Joe the Plumber’s defense?

The Columbus Dispatch reports:

Public records requested by The Dispatch disclose that information on Wurzelbacher’s driver’s license or his sport-utility vehicle was pulled from the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles database three times shortly after the debate.

Information on Wurzelbacher was accessed by accounts assigned to the office of Ohio Attorney General Nancy H. Rogers, the Cuyahoga County Child Support Enforcement Agency and the Toledo Police Department.

It has not been determined who checked on Wurzelbacher, or why. Direct access to driver’s license and vehicle registration information from BMV computers is restricted to legitimate law enforcement and government business.

The paper characterizes a McCain spokesman as “attemping to portray” the breach as “politically motivated.”

Geez Louise. Is there any other reason such a breach would take place immediately after Wurzelbacher was mentioned in a national presidential debate?

Of course it’s politically motivated. The question is not whether. The question is who.

The attorney general’s office is investigating if the access of Wuzelbacher’s BMV information through the office’s Ohio Law Enforcement Gateway computer system was unauthorized, said spokeswoman Jennifer Brindisi.

“We’re trying to pinpoint where it came from,” she said. The investigation could become “criminal in nature,” she said. Brindisi would not identify the account that pulled the information on Oct. 16.

Records show it was a “test account” assigned to the information technology section of the attorney general’s office, said Department of Public Safety spokesman Thomas Hunter.

Brindisi later said investigators have confirmed that Wurzelbacher’s information was not accessed within the attorney general’s office. She declined to provide details. The office’s test accounts are shared with and used by other law enforcement-related agencies, she said.

On Oct. 17, BMV information on Wurzelbacher was obtained through an account used by the Cuyahoga County Child Support Enforcement Agency in Cleveland, records show.

Mary Denihan, spokeswoman for the county agency, said the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services contacted the agency today and requested an investigation of the access to Wurzelbacher’s information. Cuyahoga County court records do not show any child-support cases involving Wurzelbacher.

The State Highway Patrol, which administers the Law Enforcement Automated Data System in Ohio, asked Toledo police to explain why it pulled BMV information on Wurzelbacher within 48 hours of the debate, Hunter said.

After the State Department passport fiasco, heads rolled. Obama spokesman Bill Burton raged: “Our government’s duty is to protect the private information of the American people, not use it for political purposes.”

Are plumbers who oppose socialism exempt?

Posted in: Joe The Plumber

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Question of the day « Right Minded Online
  2. Michelle Malkin » Best interview of Joe Biden ever
  3. JammieWearingFool
  4. Joe the Plumber - how an O! admin will handle apostates
  5. Darleen's Place
  6. ScoopThis.Org » Obama supporters inside Ohio government illegally search private records!
  7. Will the privacy champions come to Joe the Plumber’s defense? | PoliticsMuch.com
  8. The Wide Awake Cafe » A Squirrel Attacked the Transformer
  9. Steynian 275 « Free Canuckistan!
  10. Joe Gets Baited Over Spreading The Wealth « Mcnorman’s Weblog
  11. Michelle Malkin » L.A. Times sits on video of Obama toasting radical Jew-basher
  12. Best Biden Interview Yet (Video) « The Political Page
  13. Getting Nasty
  14. F3 Coalition - [Faith. Family. Freedom.] » Blog Archive » Getting Nasty
  15. ChooseTheHero.com » Blog Archive » Getting Nasty
  16. L.A. Times sits on video of Obama toasting radical Jew-basher « Jay Keating’s 2008 Weblog
  17. Swamp Hermit’s *QUICK* Bits « The Swamp Hermit’s Report
  18. Trading Bush for Obama (Trading Moonshine for Toxic Waste) « Zipline Conservative
  19. Why? Will asks what everyone wants to know… « Mcnorman’s Weblog
  20. Best interview of Joe Biden ever
  21. THE BEST ONE MINUTE VIDEO » Winds Of Jihad
  22. Obama and 7 Things God Hates: « Riggword Weblog
  23. The Shape Of A Cabinet | PoliticsMuch.com
  24. Michelle Malkin » Obama in 2001: How to bring about “redistributive change”
  25. Obama 2001 Bombshell Redistribution of Wealth Audio Uncovered « Mcnorman’s Weblog
  26. Jesus is Lord, A Worshipping Christian’s Blog » Blog Archive » “Will the Privacy Champions Come to Joe the Plumber’s Defense?” by Michelle Malkin
  27. Jesus is Lord, A Worshipping Christian’s Blog » Blog Archive » “Obama in 2001: How to Bring About ‘Redistributive Change’” by Michelle Malkin
  28. Rhymes With Right
  29. Michelle Malkin » Ohio official who snooped Joe the Plumber’s records is an Obama donor
  30. Global Security Watch
  31. Objective journalism: Does it still exist? - US Message Board
  32. Obama and the Rules for Radicals « Reformed Musings
  33. Obama’s Associates Reveal Him; Can you name them?: « Riggword Weblog
  34. Michelle Malkin » Finally: A newspaper condemns Ohio’s snoopers
  35. Michelle Malkin » Plundering the plumber’s records
  36. Will the privacy champions come to Joe the Plumber’s defense? « Top Daily Digest Reading
  37. Protecting Obama Again! « Centurean2’s Weblog
  38. Obama and the Rules for Radicals « One Man’s Thoughts
  39. Michelle Malkin » Not even a wrist slap for snoop who violated Joe the Plumber’s privacy

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #514824
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:37 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Well at least we found out that watershed is a teacher. The security of an academic life allows a person to indulge a liberal theology.

  2. #514825
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:38 pm, JHSII said:

    btw, the issue for this thread is:

    The paper characterizes a McCain spokesman as “attemping to portray” the breach as “politically motivated.”

    Geez Louise. Is there any other reason such a breach would take place immediately after Wurzelbacher was mentioned in a national presidential debate?

    Of course it’s politically motivated. The question is not whether. The question is who.

    After the State Department passport fiasco, heads rolled. Obama spokesman Bill Burton raged: “Our government’s duty is to protect the private information of the American people, not use it for political purposes.”

    Are plumbers who oppose socialism exempt?

    I guess now talking about the topic of the thread is a distraction in the thread itself. :roll:

  3. #514828
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:39 pm, JHSII said:

    More personal attacks from nyc123me.

    My agreeing with Michelle Malkin on her own blog makes me a liberal troll.

    Thanks nyc123me.

  4. #514831
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:40 pm, FamilyMan said:

    brooklyn red
    How about playing “chicken” with two very fast cars and no seat belts.

  5. #514832
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:40 pm, nyc123me said:

    JHSII admits by default he is a liar, since he is unable to back up his claims. Thank you.

  6. #514834
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:41 pm, JHSII said:

    Another lie from nyc123me. Can’t he think of anything new?

    My agreeing with Michelle Malkin on her own blog makes me a liberal troll.

    Thanks nyc123me.

  7. #514835
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:42 pm, brooklyn red said:

    I guess now talking about the topic of the thread is a distraction in the thread itself.

    Too late! beit swords or pistols?

  8. #514837
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:44 pm, nyc123me said:

    I opt for naked fists and steel-capped boots. :)

    Hey JHSII, why wont you answer anything I challenge you with? Is it because you can’t? Can’t say I’m a liar – I’m asking a question, not making a statement, so come on, I’m waiting..

  9. #514838
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:44 pm, JHSII said:

    Swords!!

    I fight as a 16th level Fighter Lord (although technically my current character is a 16th level Archer Grandmaster).

  10. #514843
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:46 pm, JHSII said:

    nyc123me – you haven’t challenged me with anything. You’ve lied and attacked. Are you going to start acting like an adult?

  11. #514845
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:47 pm, FamilyMan said:

    You guys need to save your energy for the long political fight ahead.

  12. #514847
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:49 pm, nyc123me said:

    I’ve challenged you repeatedly to answer where I’ve lied, to show where I said things you claim I’ve said, to back up claims you’ve made, and you have not done so ONCE, all you’ve done is answer everything with “another lie from nyc..”, even when all I’ve done is ask you a question. Your arrogance is astoundingly obtuse, but hey, I’m definitely game if you want to make it personal.

  13. #514850
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:53 pm, nyc123me said:

    Just to remind you JHSII, it started back with my comment #34, and then you ‘responded’ on comment #37 with an unprovoked attack that said, and I quote,
    “the problem is you and people like you. I guess intimidation to anyone who dares to speak out or question the left is ok with you.”

    Of course I defended myself, contrary to your claim that, and I quote,
    “I feel sorry for you, I really do. When you finally decide to speak out for yourself..”

    And then again another attack on #45 where you claimed, and I quote,
    “How dare anyone stand up to liberal intimidation when someone like you is there to provide cover for them”
    Yes, apparently my effort to take a less rabid view of the situation equated to providing cover for liberal intimidation. Are you even slightly surprised that I’m royally pi$$ed by such Obama-like tactics?

    And then in comment #58 you claims, and I quote,
    “You were the one who said that an invasion of privacy that is deliberately meant to intimidate doesn’t mean anything”,
    and reiterated that in comment #125 by saying, and I quote,
    “I directly quoted you – and you say that you never said it.”

    Well I never did say it, and I have been challenging you to prove otherwise ever since, and all you can do is respond by saying I’m the liar, and I’m attacking you!

    Hell yes, I am angry at such arrogance and utter stupidity and incapability to support your own outrageous claims that is usually only exhibited by trolls like LGM, hence my conclusion that, JHSII : LIBERAL TROLL.

    Hey, if I say it over and over and over like you do, I guess that will make it true?

  14. #514853
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:58 pm, brooklyn red said:

    I fight as a 16th level Fighter Lord (although technically my current character is a 16th level Archer Grandmaster).

    Oh dear God! Lord please return my love from Iraq & replace her with a 16th level fighter.

  15. #514854
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:58 pm, JHSII said:

    nyc123me – you posted:

    JHSII : LIBERAL TROLL

    I am a Conservative. That makes your post a lie and an attack.

    The problem is yours, and only yours.

  16. #514855
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:58 pm, nyc123me said:

    I have to head out now, so don’t expect further response from me. I’d like to add that I’ve made the mistake of letting some arrogant lib troll get the better of me, and I apologize for that.

  17. #514856
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:58 pm, FamilyMan said:

    brooklyn red
    Something quick and deadly.

  18. #514857
    On October 25th, 2008 at 6:59 pm, JHSII said:

    brooklyn red:

    Oh dear God! Lord please return my love from Iraq & replace her with a 16th level fighter.

    I wanted to go back in, but at my age they won’t let me. …sigh…

  19. #514858
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:00 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Down here in Arizona several policeman and others have been fired for using the law enforcement database for non-police business. Now that is with, I hope, honest police and city, county, state officials in charge. Just a few rough individuals-that you will always have.

    Take overly politically aware types such as Chicago, San Francisco, parts of Ohio and those data bases becomes weapons.

  20. #514860
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:01 pm, nyc123me said:

    JHSII that you are a lib troll is my opinion, based on your inability to back up anything you claim, and as a response to your unprovoked attacks on me as specified above, as you very well know.
    You lose.

  21. #514861
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:01 pm, JHSII said:

    …and yet another attack from nyc123me.

    This is what happens when you stop thinking for yourself.

  22. #514862
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:02 pm, JHSII said:

    Wait, I thought nyc123me was going to leave because he said:

    I have to head out now, so don’t expect further response from me.

    I guess that’s yet another lie to pile on the rest.

    …and the projection continues…

  23. #514863
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:04 pm, brooklyn red said:

    ArizonaNeanderthal said:
    …those data bases becomes weapons.

    Information is always the formidable weapon.

  24. #514867
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:09 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Personal privacy and government transparency are the foundation of our freedoms. Those who abuse the public trust should be prosecuted to the maximum extent of the law.

  25. #514870
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:10 pm, watershed said:

    Actually, Familyman, mock away, but I am an entreprenuer with his own very successful music school. I make a lot of green, something your red staters should be proud of. But am willing to pay, gasp, taxes! I consider that sacrifice PATRIOTIC. Imagine that.

    Like I said, mock away. You guys are at least semi-talented in that area.

  26. #514874
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:11 pm, watershed said:

    #216

    Schiavo and govt intrusion. Square it for me.

  27. #514877
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:13 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed said:
    Schiavo and govt intrusion. Square it for me.

    I never agreed with action of congress.

  28. #514882
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:16 pm, watershed said:

    #219

    My pardon. I take back my assumption. But admittedly, you are an exception, yes?

  29. #514883
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:19 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed
    Most of us on our Michelle’s thread believe in the strict definition of the Constitution. That includes states rights.

  30. #514884
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:19 pm, brooklyn red said:

    FamilyMan, don’t go there, you are dealing with a pro… I can smell an op 3 clicks out, & as uncle ho said, silence is a weapon.

  31. #514886
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:23 pm, JHSII said:

    I wonder if watershed knows the difference between sacrifice and having something taken from you?

  32. #514888
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:25 pm, FamilyMan said:

    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:23 pm, JHSII said:
    I wonder if watershed knows the difference between sacrifice and having something taken from you?

    He’s a school teacher. Need I say more.

  33. #514894
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:36 pm, FamilyMan said:

    brooklyn red said: don’t go there, you are dealing with a pro

    I’ve slammed better than watershed.

  34. #514896
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:43 pm, FamilyMan said:

    This has been a strange thread today.
    It’s SUPPER TIME

  35. #514898
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:46 pm, watershed said:

    #222

    A fine example of the paranoia that permeates your ilk here. No one’s out to get you, cupcake.

  36. #514900
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:48 pm, watershed said:

    #224 Amazing the disconnect between your “family values” world and the idea that somehow school is bad. Knowledge is bad! Learning is bad! Science and reality are bad!

    And ignorance is bliss.

  37. #514901
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:50 pm, watershed said:

    #221

    I am pretty sure Malkin was ALL FOR intervention on the Schiavo case. Please correct me if I am wrong.

  38. #514903
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:52 pm, JHSII said:

    watershed – you responded to FamilyMan, but why not me?

    Do you know the difference between sacrifice and having something taken from you?

  39. #514904
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:52 pm, watershed said:

    #230

    I think that my country is worth the financial sacrifice.

  40. #514907
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:54 pm, watershed said:

    #230

    Dude, what’s with you crazies and the “lib troll” weirdness? Dont yiou think you can argue points without resorting to paranoid fantasies about liberal gremlins?

  41. #514909
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:57 pm, nyc123me said:

    Seems my plans have changed about going out, but the short break gave me a moment to reflect on the actions of myself, JHSII and others like him.

    It seems the type of arrogant closed mindset of Obama-cultist liberals that was until recently held in great disdain on this site is now becoming more and more acceptable when displayed by supposed Republicans, as we get closer and closer to The Day.

    I believe this thread is an example of the huge assumptions based on speculation with little or no solid fact behind it that is so much a hallmark of liberal thinking, and attempted to point this out on comment #34, lest we start looking like the liberals we so disdain.

    Unfortunately I was repeatedly attacked for daring to have a mind of my own, and had no support from anyone here, despite clearly pointing out the outrageous lies from JHSII and challenging him to prove them, which eventually resulted in me saying some stupid things. I let the arrogance of JHSII get the better of me, that was my mistake.

    I don’t like the way this made me feel or act, lowering myself to the same lack of standards or respect as JSHII.

    I had what a believe is a valid opinion, and gave reasons for them. I was attacked for speaking my mind and voicing my questions, much like Joe the Plumber is being attacked. How ironic. I was attacked by a person who repeatedly lied about what I said and failed to give any reasoning for their attacks or to refute any points I made, in perhaps some pathetic attempt at brown-nosing Michelle. I think Michelle can stick up for herself JHSII, and you certainly were not doing her or anyone else any favors by your actions.

    On that note, I am leaving this site, I really don’t like the ugly tone it has taken of late, and I have little respect for the hypocrisy of being attacked for speaking my mind in comment #34 when my reasons for doing so were laid out clearly and logically for anyone to refute rather than make ad hominem attacks.

    I can’t explicitly delete my account, but I can change the password to something random and delete the gmail address that I created solely for this account.

    Keep up the good fight, and I hope at least some of us survive the dark times ahead should Obama win the day.

    Kia Kaha.

  42. #514910
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:59 pm, nyc123me said:

    Oh classic, JHSII whining on #230 because someone won’t answer his question.. pot, kettle, black. Nice to go out on a note of seeing the pompous a$$ contradict himself yet again.

  43. #514911
    On October 25th, 2008 at 7:59 pm, Rob said:

    On that note, I am leaving this site.

    lol

  44. #514913
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:00 pm, brooklyn red said:

    watershed said:
    #222
    A fine example of the paranoia that permeates your ilk here. No one’s out to get you, cupcake.

    yeah, yeah, whatever… it’s Saturday nite in NYC & I some ballot box to stuff :) … hate to say goodbye, but this is it for you & me. xoxo

  45. #514914
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:01 pm, watershed said:

    #236

    Lata scaredy cat. Liberal boogie man says BOO!

  46. #514920
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:05 pm, watershed said:

    #233

    And he’s as much a freaky con as the rest of you.

    Boo-poo! (circling finger next to forehead)

  47. #514923
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:08 pm, JHSII said:

    No whining from me, just more lies and attacks from nyc123me. The only ugly tone here came from you.

    I will continue being my good old Conservative self. Ty ty ty!!

    LOL

  48. #514925
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:10 pm, JHSII said:

    watershed #230

    I think that my country is worth the financial sacrifice.

    That wasn’t the question.

    What is the difference between sacrifice and having something taken from you?

    It should be an easy question.

  49. #514928
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:12 pm, rambler said:

    Attacking Joe the plumber is typical of the Chicago way of doing things. I wondered what took them so long to pound him. Look for more of this if Obama is elected.

  50. #514930
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:15 pm, watershed said:

    #233, 239

    Full disclosure. I have con-dar. It’s like gaydar. I can tell when someone is a poor-hating greed-loving con. It’s a gift. And trust me, you two wackadoos are MEANT for each other. You’re equally paranoid and god-fearing! You just had a terrible miscommunication. Now shake hands under this picture of Bill Kristol and let bygones be bygones.

  51. #514931
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:18 pm, allrsn said:

    If you are unable to get the stream, utube has it.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxT0ELP7az0

  52. #514932
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:19 pm, watershed said:

    #240

    I dont know. What is the difference? You tell me.

  53. #514934
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:21 pm, watershed said:

    #243

    Not the big win you think it is. Quite the opposite. Kinda like Bachmann. very McCarthy.

  54. #514936
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:27 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On October 25th, 2008 at 5:29 pm, b-cat said:

    …I’d recommend a little more firepower, my friend.

    I’ve been offline for a few hours. What would you recommend?

  55. #514937
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:32 pm, JHSII said:

    watershed – That’s what I thought.

    A sacrifice is done willingly.
    To have something taken from me is exactly the opposite.

    At least that’s my definition.

  56. #514939
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:34 pm, watershed said:

    #247

    I am WILLING to pay taxes. So bang goes that theory, guy.

  57. #514940
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:35 pm, watershed said:

    #247

    And seriously, what’s with the liberal gremlin thing? Are you really that scared?

  58. #514941
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:36 pm, JHSII said:

    watershed – If taxes were something you didn’t have to pay your arguement would work.

  59. #514942
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:36 pm, Joy said:

    I find it sickening that everytime someone speaks from the right, the left does everything it can to silence them.

    Sacrificed vs Taken – The first is a choice we make of our own free will; the latter is when something is taken against our will either by force or intimidation.

    Certainly is an easy question.

  60. #514943
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:37 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed said;I am WILLING to pay taxes.

    What part of the government do you wish your taxes to be used for?

  61. #514945
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:40 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:36 pm, Joy said:

    I find it sickening that everytime someone speaks from the right,
    the left does everything it can to silence them.

    Those who can’t handle the truth,
    try to silence those who speak it.

  62. #514947
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:41 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed
    Is there a limit to your patriotism?
    Is there a limit to the amount of taxes you will pay?
    Is there a limit to the size of our government?

  63. #514948
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:43 pm, Rob said:

    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:34 pm, watershed said:
    #247

    I am WILLING to pay taxes. So bang goes that theory, guy.

    If they would earmark the money for setting up a special section of the United States Marine Corp for “Gang and Illegal Alien Roundup and Elimination“, I might toss a few more bucks in the pot too… it would pay off big time.

    I just don’t want any of my money to keep paying for the leeches that are breeding and spreading like cockroaches.

  64. #514950
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:45 pm, watershed said:

    #252

    Specify. Social security, health care, defense, etc? What are my priorities?

  65. #514951
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:46 pm, watershed said:

    #254

    Is there a limit to your patriotism?

  66. #514952
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:46 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed
    Is there a limit to your patriotism?
    Is there a limit to the amount of taxes you will pay?
    Is there a limit to the size of our government?

  67. #514953
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:47 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Lata scaredy cat. Liberal boogie man says BOO!

    Perhaps no one is out to get us but for a little history read about Woodrow Wilson’s tactics toward anyone opposing him.

    “the Sedition Act, which made “saying anything” to discourage the purchase of war bonds a crime. The law also made it illegal to “utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language” about the government, the Constitution, or the uniform of the army or navy.

    This from a President who first coined the phrase “Living Document and Impediment to Progress”.

    And there was the War Socialism of Mr. Progressive Liberal Woodrow Wilson.

    Throw in FDR’s NRA Act enforcement and we tend to be a bit leery about the Liberal Bogyman. Want to go for LBJ next? He sure did a job on the Right to a Trial by a Jury of Our Peers, but later.

  68. #514954
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:47 pm, watershed said:

    #255

    Leeches that spread like cockroaches? Wanna reel in your metaphors? Specify what you mean. Sounds kinda glib.

  69. #514955
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:48 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed
    SIMPLE QUESTIONS

  70. #514958
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:50 pm, FamilyMan said:

    ArizonaNeanderthal Good to see ya.
    I knew you show up.

  71. #514959
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:51 pm, watershed said:

    358

    Your paranoia is startling and telling. This is my country, and either president will have ideas taxwise that I can and will abide by.

  72. #514960
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:52 pm, watershed said:

    #261

    You’re honestly not as much of a “master debater” as you think. My tax levels are fine with me. And as an American, I am willing to pay them. Its what AMERICANS DO.

  73. #514961
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:53 pm, FamilyMan said:

    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:51 pm, watershed said:
    Your paranoia is startling and telling. This is my country, and either president will have ideas taxwise that I can and will abide by.

    That wasn’t the question.

  74. #514964
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:54 pm, Rob said:

    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:47 pm, watershed said:
    #255

    Leeches that spread like cockroaches? Wanna reel in your metaphors? Specify what you mean. Sounds kinda glib.

    Leeches… inner city losers sucking up welfare.

    Kookarachas … illegal aliens.

  75. #514965
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:54 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed again
    SIMPLE QUESTIONS

  76. #514966
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:54 pm, watershed said:

    #259

    This site is rife with paranoia. they think that liberals are going to put them in concentration camps. No joke. So feel free to show your historical knowledge in whatever capacity you wish, but i am talking about these posters on this website.

  77. #514967
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:56 pm, watershed said:

    #266

    Racism much? Amazing. Americans all, “those people”, btw.

  78. #514968
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:56 pm, watershed said:

    #267

    Why dont you tell me what you want to hear. Sigh.

  79. #514969
    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:57 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed
    Is there a limit to your patriotism?
    Is there a limit to the amount of taxes you will pay?
    Is there a limit to the size of our government?

    READ VERY SLOWLY

    and answer the questions.

  80. #514971
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:01 pm, watershed said:

    #271

    1) I imagine there is. I havent seen it.

    2)yes, but we are nowhere near it.

    3) yes, but we are nowhere near it.

  81. #514972
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:02 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Were are the limits? watershed

  82. #514973
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:04 pm, watershed said:

    #273

    I dont know, as we are nowhere near it.

  83. #514974
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:04 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On October 25th, 2008 at 8:34 pm, watershed said:
    #247

    I am WILLING to pay taxes. So bang goes that theory, guy.

    Mine too? I sent in the Fourth Quarter a week + ago so could you send me a check? I’ll cover my share of Continental Defense, I just want help with the rest, ACORNS and such. My Marginal Tax Rate is 33%– a lot for ACORNS and other people’s compassion.
    Just help with my FICA (SECA). I pay 15.3%, what do you pay FICA O’WILLINGwatershed One?

    Please help, will work for food.

    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

  84. #514975
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:05 pm, watershed said:

    #275

    Pretty paranoid. Such is the theme of this site.

  85. #514977
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:07 pm, watershed said:

    #275

    By all means, brave one, pull a Ruby Ridge. You are such a talker! Big strong brave man.

    Just admit you’re all bravado already. Its sad.

  86. #514980
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:13 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Arizona..me thinks waterboard is flirting with you. :wink:

    you big strong brave guy you!

  87. #514983
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:16 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed; I happy that you are so patriotic and trusting in our OH SO TRANSPARENT AND EFFICIENT GOVERNMENT
    I’ve’ payed over $10,000,000 in taxes in my life time and I’ve seen half of it wasted.
    You say you own a private music school. Why not let the government teach the children music? They teach math so well./sarc

  88. #514984
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:16 pm, watershed said:

    #278

    I know! It’s the big “arms and militia” talk while simply discussing taxes. It gets everyone all worked up, I’m sure!

  89. #514985
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:18 pm, watershed said:

    #279

    I learned music from pubic schools my entire life. It gave the knowledge and skills I have today that I use in my (quite successful) school. So again, bang goes that theory.

  90. #514987
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:19 pm, Misscheryl said:

    waterboard, if you don’t laugh at yourself, someone will do it for you.

    You take yourself way too seriously!

  91. #514988
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:19 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    ACTION ALERT!
    If you live in New York City or LA, we need your help tomorrow.

    We need people to go like Jason did at the DNC and ilfiltrate the Marxists:

    MAKING REVOLUTION IN THE U.S.A.
    REVOLUTION BOOKS PRESENTS A PROGRAM ON:

    Do we need a revolution and a radically different
    society? What is happening every day—what this system
    does to people, day in, day out—here and all over the
    world, cries out: YES, WE DO.

    Is revolution really possible in a country like the U.S.?
    YES, IT IS.

    Is there actually a strategy and method for approaching
    how to make such a revolution? YES, THERE IS.

    Is there a group that is organized on the basis of that
    strategy and method, is working for such a revolution
    and could lead that revolution when the time is right?
    YES, AGAIN.

    Come hear some straight talk about these vital questions by speakers
    representing the Revolutionary Communist Party, USA. Then dig into this.

    Questions and answers on: making revolution in the U.S.A.

    Tickets: $15/sliding scale for unemployed & low income
    Simultaneous translation into Spanish

    NEW YORK CITY
    Sunday, October 26, 1 pm
    Schomburg Center for
    Research in Black Culture
    515 Malcolm X Blvd. @ 135th St. NYC
    Sponsored by Revolution Books
    For information call: 212.691.3345
    http://www.revolutionbooksnyc.org
    Directions: Subway ➁ or ➂ to 135th St.

    LOS ANGELES
    Sunday, October 26, 1 pm
    Golden Eagle Ballroom
    California State University, Los Angeles
    5151 State University Drive
    For information call: 213.488.1303
    librosrevolucion.blog.com
    http://www.calstatela.edu for directions
    (near Parking Structure C)

    No Joke, we need to know what they are planning…

    YES, WE DO.
    YES, IT IS.
    YES, THERE IS.
    YES, AGAIN.

    Same cadence as…

    YES, WE CAN!

    The Red Commies are coming!
    The Red Commies are coming!

    (Modern-day Paul Revere)

  92. #514989
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:19 pm, joannmandolin said:

    There is hope;
    two new signs appeared at houses on my street this week:

    Democrat for McCAIN

    and

    NOBAMA.

    Me like!!!

  93. #514990
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:19 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed Why not let the government teach the children music?

  94. #514991
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:21 pm, watershed said:

    #282

    Trust me miss, I am laughing. This entire time. This site is epic LULZ.

  95. #514994
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:22 pm, watershed said:

    #282

    And #283 is what…funny? talk about wayyyy too seriously. (And hopelessly misinformed, but thats a different story.)

  96. #514995
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:23 pm, watershed said:

    #285

    They do. very well.

  97. #514997
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:24 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed said:
    They do. very well.

    Why not let them do all the teaching?

  98. #514999
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:25 pm, watershed said:

    #289

    thats not how it works.

  99. #515000
    On October 25th, 2008 at 9:25 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed
    How does it work?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

In defense of Joe

January 14, 2009 07:23 PM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

JTP in Sderot: “Do you think this is normal, the way you cover this conflict…?”

January 11, 2009 09:47 PM by Michelle Malkin

31 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

“He also observed and reported from the house where a Kassam landed on Sunday afternoon.”

“Is that an airplane or a helicopter?”

January 11, 2009 11:51 AM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments | 1 Trackback

“Professional” question of the morning.

Who’s afraid of Joe the Journalist?

January 9, 2009 08:38 AM by Michelle Malkin

199 Comments | 29 Trackbacks

Joe the Plumber heads to Israel

January 7, 2009 12:52 PM by Michelle Malkin

83 Comments | 16 Trackbacks

Ohio snooper who targeted Joe the Plumber resigns

December 17, 2008 08:37 PM by Michelle Malkin

55 Comments | 14 Trackbacks

Heads finally roll.

Whistleblower exposes the Joe the Plumber snoopers’ cover-up

December 5, 2008 07:12 AM by Michelle Malkin

37 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

“Dictated word for word.”


Categories: Joe The Plumber




HotAir GreenRoom