<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here comes the Obam-ified Bill of Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/here-comes-the-liberal-bill-of-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/here-comes-the-liberal-bill-of-rights/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:15:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama is Bringing Sexlebrity Back &#171; Trust, But Verify</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/here-comes-the-liberal-bill-of-rights/comment-page-2/#comment-520145</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama is Bringing Sexlebrity Back &#171; Trust, But Verify</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17747#comment-520145</guid>
		<description>[...] with the socialists while in college and afterward, his tax plan changed overnight, Obama wants a Second Bill of Rights and New Deal, and I still don’t know how much he has spent on his wardrobe or Biden’s plugs.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with the socialists while in college and afterward, his tax plan changed overnight, Obama wants a Second Bill of Rights and New Deal, and I still don’t know how much he has spent on his wardrobe or Biden’s plugs.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/here-comes-the-liberal-bill-of-rights/comment-page-2/#comment-519998</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17747#comment-519998</guid>
		<description>Hey, that sounds eerily familiar...

&lt;blockquote&gt;7. We demand that the state be charged first with providing the opportunity for a livelihood and way of life for the citizens.

14. We demand a division of profits of all heavy industries.

16. We demand the creation of a healthy middle class and its conservation, immediate communalization of the great warehouses and their being leased at low cost to small firms, the utmost consideration of all small firms in contracts with the State, county or municipality.

20. The state is to be responsible for a fundamental reconstruction of our whole national education program, to enable every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education and subsequently introduction into leading positions. 

21. The State is to care for the elevating national health by protecting the mother and child.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And last, but not least:

&lt;blockquote&gt;25. For the execution of all of this we demand the formation of a strong central power in the Reich.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;i&gt;-- National Socialist Program  (aka NAZI Program)&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, that sounds eerily familiar&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>7. We demand that the state be charged first with providing the opportunity for a livelihood and way of life for the citizens.</p>
<p>14. We demand a division of profits of all heavy industries.</p>
<p>16. We demand the creation of a healthy middle class and its conservation, immediate communalization of the great warehouses and their being leased at low cost to small firms, the utmost consideration of all small firms in contracts with the State, county or municipality.</p>
<p>20. The state is to be responsible for a fundamental reconstruction of our whole national education program, to enable every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education and subsequently introduction into leading positions. </p>
<p>21. The State is to care for the elevating national health by protecting the mother and child.</p></blockquote>
<p>And last, but not least:</p>
<blockquote><p>25. For the execution of all of this we demand the formation of a strong central power in the Reich.</p></blockquote>
<p><i>&#8211; National Socialist Program  (aka NAZI Program)</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NJ-Aviator</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/here-comes-the-liberal-bill-of-rights/comment-page-2/#comment-519717</link>
		<dc:creator>NJ-Aviator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17747#comment-519717</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;bluesoc said:

Just a quick clarification. Obama did not say there should be a second bill of rights, U.S. Rep. Marcy Kaptur did.

The headline was a bit misleading.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No.  The headline is quite descriptive and accurate.

Obama-fied: &lt;em&gt;To be made like or cast with the vision of, The One.  Not necessarily a direct work of The One, but a work that He would endorse or move forward.&lt;/em&gt;

So if this communist-marxist anti-American facade of a man is actually elected, bills containing concepts like this one will be spewed forth like waste water from a broken sewer line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>bluesoc said:</p>
<p>Just a quick clarification. Obama did not say there should be a second bill of rights, U.S. Rep. Marcy Kaptur did.</p>
<p>The headline was a bit misleading.
</p></blockquote>
<p>No.  The headline is quite descriptive and accurate.</p>
<p>Obama-fied: <em>To be made like or cast with the vision of, The One.  Not necessarily a direct work of The One, but a work that He would endorse or move forward.</em></p>
<p>So if this communist-marxist anti-American facade of a man is actually elected, bills containing concepts like this one will be spewed forth like waste water from a broken sewer line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaMidnightRider</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/here-comes-the-liberal-bill-of-rights/comment-page-2/#comment-519587</link>
		<dc:creator>GaMidnightRider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 05:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17747#comment-519587</guid>
		<description>We are watching the destruction of our country. I fear we are living in the last days of our great counrty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are watching the destruction of our country. I fear we are living in the last days of our great counrty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: If Obama gets in I have one question for you: What color would you like your hat or uniform to be? &#171; Dianej&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/here-comes-the-liberal-bill-of-rights/comment-page-2/#comment-519487</link>
		<dc:creator>If Obama gets in I have one question for you: What color would you like your hat or uniform to be? &#171; Dianej&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17747#comment-519487</guid>
		<description>[...] If Obama gets in I have one question for you: What color would you like your hat or uniform to&#160;be?  Posted on October 29, 2008 by dianej   Karl Marx, author of &#8220;The Communist Manifesto,&#8221; advocated redistributing wealth in order to achieve a classless society. Senator Obama wants to redistributing wealth . I have one question if Obama gets in what color would you like your hat and/or uniform to be? Maybe just a red star woud do? Not sure what do you think?  Maybe J Crew could design the uniforms&#8230;&#8230;..just a thought. BTW will we create a new Bill of Rights? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If Obama gets in I have one question for you: What color would you like your hat or uniform to&nbsp;be?  Posted on October 29, 2008 by dianej   Karl Marx, author of &#8220;The Communist Manifesto,&#8221; advocated redistributing wealth in order to achieve a classless society. Senator Obama wants to redistributing wealth . I have one question if Obama gets in what color would you like your hat and/or uniform to be? Maybe just a red star woud do? Not sure what do you think?  Maybe J Crew could design the uniforms&#8230;&#8230;..just a thought. BTW will we create a new Bill of Rights? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laree</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/here-comes-the-liberal-bill-of-rights/comment-page-2/#comment-519335</link>
		<dc:creator>Laree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17747#comment-519335</guid>
		<description>This is a great cartoon, Makers vs Takers...spreading the wealth.

http://sarah-palin-2008.blogspot.com/2008/10/spread-wealth-around.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great cartoon, Makers vs Takers&#8230;spreading the wealth.</p>
<p><a href="http://sarah-palin-2008.blogspot.com/2008/10/spread-wealth-around.html" rel="nofollow">http://sarah-palin-2008.blogspot.com/2008/10/spread-wealth-around.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogue Cheddar</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/here-comes-the-liberal-bill-of-rights/comment-page-2/#comment-519245</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogue Cheddar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17747#comment-519245</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On October 28th, 2008 at 1:14 pm, etienne said: 
I bet Obama acts very niggardly in his person life. Bet he gives niggardly tips to the waiter.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Niggardly, perfectly good word that. So was the word gay, at one time. (sigh)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On October 28th, 2008 at 1:14 pm, etienne said:<br />
I bet Obama acts very niggardly in his person life. Bet he gives niggardly tips to the waiter.</p></blockquote>
<p>Niggardly, perfectly good word that. So was the word gay, at one time. (sigh)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alaskangrizzly</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/here-comes-the-liberal-bill-of-rights/comment-page-2/#comment-519203</link>
		<dc:creator>alaskangrizzly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17747#comment-519203</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The headline was a bit misleading.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How is it misleading? Rep. Kaptur (D) said it on stage at an Obama rally just before Obama took the stage and Obama didn&#039;t refute a single statement Rep. Kaptur made. Sounds &quot;Obam-ified&quot; to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The headline was a bit misleading.</p></blockquote>
<p>How is it misleading? Rep. Kaptur (D) said it on stage at an Obama rally just before Obama took the stage and Obama didn&#8217;t refute a single statement Rep. Kaptur made. Sounds &#8220;Obam-ified&#8221; to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiredofit08</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/here-comes-the-liberal-bill-of-rights/comment-page-2/#comment-519168</link>
		<dc:creator>tiredofit08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17747#comment-519168</guid>
		<description>its funny that the current bill of rights has served us very well since 1776...otherwise the United States wouldn&#039;t be the place of choice for just about everyone in the world...hmmmm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its funny that the current bill of rights has served us very well since 1776&#8230;otherwise the United States wouldn&#8217;t be the place of choice for just about everyone in the world&#8230;hmmmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluesoc</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/here-comes-the-liberal-bill-of-rights/comment-page-2/#comment-519145</link>
		<dc:creator>bluesoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17747#comment-519145</guid>
		<description>Just a quick clarification. Obama did not say there should be a second bill of rights, U.S. Rep. Marcy Kaptur did.

The headline was a bit misleading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick clarification. Obama did not say there should be a second bill of rights, U.S. Rep. Marcy Kaptur did.</p>
<p>The headline was a bit misleading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fulldroolcup</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/here-comes-the-liberal-bill-of-rights/comment-page-2/#comment-519128</link>
		<dc:creator>fulldroolcup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17747#comment-519128</guid>
		<description>Funny:  you don&#039;t see lgm commenting about this.

Nor mistressjustice

Nor chapoutier

Nor watershed

Nor any of the other D-list trolls infesting this site.

They won&#039;t comment because they either BELIEVE this communist nonsense, and don&#039;t want to admit they are Leninist soulmates, or they are EMBARRASSED that their Saviour is espousing such un-American bullcrap.

Can you comprehend the MEGALOMANIA behind Obama&#039;s motivating belief: that the Founders were WRONG in the way they drafted our Constitution, that only HE and Ayers and Wright know the One True Path?

I am goddam glad 100,000,000 guns stand in this egomaniac&#039;s way.

Remember what Jefferson said:  &quot;The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants&quot;.

I hope the fascist moonbats remember that too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny:  you don&#8217;t see lgm commenting about this.</p>
<p>Nor mistressjustice</p>
<p>Nor chapoutier</p>
<p>Nor watershed</p>
<p>Nor any of the other D-list trolls infesting this site.</p>
<p>They won&#8217;t comment because they either BELIEVE this communist nonsense, and don&#8217;t want to admit they are Leninist soulmates, or they are EMBARRASSED that their Saviour is espousing such un-American bullcrap.</p>
<p>Can you comprehend the MEGALOMANIA behind Obama&#8217;s motivating belief: that the Founders were WRONG in the way they drafted our Constitution, that only HE and Ayers and Wright know the One True Path?</p>
<p>I am goddam glad 100,000,000 guns stand in this egomaniac&#8217;s way.</p>
<p>Remember what Jefferson said:  &#8220;The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants&#8221;.</p>
<p>I hope the fascist moonbats remember that too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawkeye54</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/here-comes-the-liberal-bill-of-rights/comment-page-2/#comment-519106</link>
		<dc:creator>hawkeye54</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17747#comment-519106</guid>
		<description>Correction::   You just don’t understand. flashy expensive cars, beautiful women (or men) and large homes are ONLY what THE ONE and his disciples get. and are not meant for we, the peasants, to have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction::   You just don’t understand. flashy expensive cars, beautiful women (or men) and large homes are ONLY what THE ONE and his disciples get. and are not meant for we, the peasants, to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawkeye54</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/here-comes-the-liberal-bill-of-rights/comment-page-2/#comment-519101</link>
		<dc:creator>hawkeye54</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17747#comment-519101</guid>
		<description>I meant to put in &quot;Flashy expensive cars&quot; above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to put in &#8220;Flashy expensive cars&#8221; above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawkeye54</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/here-comes-the-liberal-bill-of-rights/comment-page-2/#comment-519097</link>
		<dc:creator>hawkeye54</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17747#comment-519097</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If everybody’s going to have the right to a home, I want to put my bid in.
I want a 2000 square foot log home on a mountain ridge&lt;/blockquote&gt;

*Sigh*  You just don&#039;t understand. flashy, beautiful women (or men) and large homes are NOT what THE ONE and his disciples get. amd are not meant for we, the peasants, to have.

Yes, you (and we) will have a right to a home.  Think the movie Dr Zhivago here, if you&#039;ve seen it, and how the REDS divy up the good Doctor&#039;s Moscow house. 

 Praise the lord Obamessiah! -THE ONE will let you have your 2000 square foot house as long as its shared with  20 other families.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If everybody’s going to have the right to a home, I want to put my bid in.<br />
I want a 2000 square foot log home on a mountain ridge</p></blockquote>
<p>*Sigh*  You just don&#8217;t understand. flashy, beautiful women (or men) and large homes are NOT what THE ONE and his disciples get. amd are not meant for we, the peasants, to have.</p>
<p>Yes, you (and we) will have a right to a home.  Think the movie Dr Zhivago here, if you&#8217;ve seen it, and how the REDS divy up the good Doctor&#8217;s Moscow house. </p>
<p> Praise the lord Obamessiah! -THE ONE will let you have your 2000 square foot house as long as its shared with  20 other families.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClassicFilm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/here-comes-the-liberal-bill-of-rights/comment-page-2/#comment-519088</link>
		<dc:creator>ClassicFilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17747#comment-519088</guid>
		<description>A few weeks ago, Joe the Plumber expressed concern, during one of his many interviews, about Obama&#039;s assurance that only those earning the magic number of &quot;$250,000&quot; would see an increase in taxes, everyone else would not &quot;pay a penny more&quot; (Obama&#039;s repeated promise), but Joe thought that dollar amount could be lowered upon Obama&#039;s whim to, say, $100,000. Uh, oh, Joe, you were right. It&#039;s already happening in the Dem campaign this week. The magic $250,000 of rich people has dropped to &amp;150,000 of rich people in a week. Will it be down to $70,000 by the weekend and down to $30,000 by Election Day? Be afraid, America, be very afraid...

From Rush Limbaugh&#039;s transcripts today:

OBAMA:  If Senator McCain wants a debate about taxes in this campaign, then it is a debate I have (sic) happy to have, because if you&#039;re a family making less than $250,000 a year, my plan will not raise your taxes.

RUSH:  Later in the campaign -- this is just recently -- very slyly, very slyly, Obama reduced the figure.

OBAMA:  If you have a job, pay taxes, and make less than $200,000 a year, you&#039;ll get a tax cut.

RUSH:  Whoa! So $250,000 has become $200,000.  Yesterday Joe Biden in a TV interview on WNEP-TV, Channel 16 in Scranton Wilkes-Barre lowered it again.

BIDEN:  It should go like it used to. It should go to middle-class people, people making under $150,000 a year.

RUSH:  Now, you can say, &quot;Well, you know, this is Joe. He has these rhetorical flourishes and he may not be up to speed on what the campaign is doing,&quot; but it&#039;s come down from 250, and then went to $200,000, and yesterday Biden said you&#039;re cool if you make less than 150.  Anybody over that is going to get soaked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago, Joe the Plumber expressed concern, during one of his many interviews, about Obama&#8217;s assurance that only those earning the magic number of &#8220;$250,000&#8243; would see an increase in taxes, everyone else would not &#8220;pay a penny more&#8221; (Obama&#8217;s repeated promise), but Joe thought that dollar amount could be lowered upon Obama&#8217;s whim to, say, $100,000. Uh, oh, Joe, you were right. It&#8217;s already happening in the Dem campaign this week. The magic $250,000 of rich people has dropped to &amp;150,000 of rich people in a week. Will it be down to $70,000 by the weekend and down to $30,000 by Election Day? Be afraid, America, be very afraid&#8230;</p>
<p>From Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s transcripts today:</p>
<p>OBAMA:  If Senator McCain wants a debate about taxes in this campaign, then it is a debate I have (sic) happy to have, because if you&#8217;re a family making less than $250,000 a year, my plan will not raise your taxes.</p>
<p>RUSH:  Later in the campaign &#8212; this is just recently &#8212; very slyly, very slyly, Obama reduced the figure.</p>
<p>OBAMA:  If you have a job, pay taxes, and make less than $200,000 a year, you&#8217;ll get a tax cut.</p>
<p>RUSH:  Whoa! So $250,000 has become $200,000.  Yesterday Joe Biden in a TV interview on WNEP-TV, Channel 16 in Scranton Wilkes-Barre lowered it again.</p>
<p>BIDEN:  It should go like it used to. It should go to middle-class people, people making under $150,000 a year.</p>
<p>RUSH:  Now, you can say, &#8220;Well, you know, this is Joe. He has these rhetorical flourishes and he may not be up to speed on what the campaign is doing,&#8221; but it&#8217;s come down from 250, and then went to $200,000, and yesterday Biden said you&#8217;re cool if you make less than 150.  Anybody over that is going to get soaked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

