Sarah Palin in jeans, rocking out to “Redneck Woman”
I’ll take Sarah over the Arugula Snob and Smirky any day:
Redneck Woman
by Gretchen Wilson
Well I ain’t never
Been the barbie doll type
No I can’t swig that sweet champagne
I’d rather drink beer all night
In a tavern or in a honky tonk
Or on a 4 wheel drive tailgate
I’ve got posters on my wall of Skynard, Kid and Strait
Some people look down on me
But I don’t give a rip
I’ll stand barefooted in my own front yard with a baby on my hip
Cause I’m a redneck woman
And I ain’t no high class broad
I’m just a product of my raisin’
And I say “hey y’all” and “Yee Haw”
And I keep my Christmas lights on, on my front porch all year long
And I know all the words to every Charlie Daniels song
So here’s to all my sisters out there keepin’ it country
Let me get a big “Hell Yeah” from the redneck girls like me
Hell Yeah
Hell Yeah
Victoria’s Secret
Well their stuff’s real nice
Oh but I can buy the same damn thing on a Wal*Mart shelf half price
And still look sexy
Just as sexy
As those models on TV
No I don’t need no designer tag to make my man want me
You might think I’m trashy
A little too hard core
But get in my neck of the woods
I’m just the girl next door
Hey I’m redneck woman
And I ain’t no high class broad
I’m just a product of my raisin’
And I say “hey y’all” and “Yee Haw”
And I keep my Christmas lights on, on my front porch all year long
And I know all the words to every Tanya Tucker song
So here’s to all my sisters out there keeping it country
Let me get a big “Hell Yeah” from the redneck girls like me
Hell Yeah
Hell Yeah
I’m redneck woman
And I ain’t no high class broad
I’m just a product of my raisin’
And I say “hey y’all” and “Yee Haw”
And I keep my Christmas lights on, on my front porch all year long
And I know all the words to every Ol’ Bocephus song
So here’s to all my sisters out there keeping it country
Let me get a big “Hell Yeah” from the redneck girls like me
Hell Yeah
Hell Yeah
Hell Yeah
Hell Yeah
Hell Yeah
Hell Yeah
I Said Hell Yeah
***
What I’d love to see: Palin and Wilson in John Murtha’s district in Pennsylvania for a rally with Bill Russell.
***
Hell Yeah: Pam Meister takes on the Beltway Palin-bashers.
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
- Is Sarah Palin a “Redneck Woman”? « Conservatives For McCain
- Palin Proud « Pronk Palisades
- On Mavericks and Moderates | NeoConstant
- Palin Dances to “Redneck Woman” in Jeans | The American Pundit
- Six Meat Buffet » Sarah Palin, The Anti-Snob
- Hot Air » Blog Archive » Video: The obligatory “Palin rocks out to ‘Redneck Woman’” clip
- Back to Work: On Romney, Palin, and the Huck « Conservatives For McCain
- Sarah Palin is CHANGE WE NEED « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)
- Sarah Palin On Best Political Blogs » Blog Archive » Sarah Palin in jeans, rocking out to “Redneck Woman”
- Michelle Malkin » You might be a redneck if…
- Sarah Palin in jeans, rocking out to “Redneck Woman” « Top Daily Digest Reading
- hockey mom song to the tune of Redneck woman « at home with Guinever
- Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection (130 Cases) « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
- Sweating Sarah Palin is old meme…
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Sarah Palin
Right Pundits
» Joe Lieberman: Fort Hood Shooter Is ‘Home-Grown Terrorist’
Legal Insurrection
» Bruni de la Motte for Health Care CzarRiehl World View
» Obama: No Military Death Shall Go UnexploitedLegal Insurrection
» In The End: No Public Option, No Abortions, No Pelosi, No ReidThe Other McCain
» Paralysis by analysisThe Powers That Be
» Obama: ‘Don’t Jump to Conclusions’ About Ft. Hood; Immediately Jumps to ConclusionsLegal Insurrection
» NY Times Names Names
Assuming John McCain wnats to win this election, picking Ms. Palin was the ONLY smart thing he’s done other than take up the points made by “Joe The Plumber” (who is more articulate than McCain).
On October 28th, 2008 at 3:19 pm, Bud Fox said:
Bahhh. Humbug.
SCROOOOOOOOOGGGEE . . . .
NYK, Republicans are NOT anti-intellectual. We are anti-liberal. Ive often heard it said that, the more one is educated, the liberal one becomes. Therefore, Conservatives are un-educated.
Well, I have a Bachelor of Science Degree in Electronics and Computer Technology. I have traveled to Malaysia, from where my wife comes, therefore, my foreign policy experience is at least as good as Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s.
NYK – back at post #174 I should have asked you outright to clarify your survey info. Would you please?
On October 28th, 2008 at 2:53 pm, nyk said:
I just saw your new “glossy response” to my comment. You ignored the subject of the wasting of half a woman’s life through your philosophies.
No compassion for this woman at all?
And I made no mistake when I characterized “People Like Us” = those who think they should lord it over the rubes. We indicate the same people: the Democrats.
I’m guessing you meant “IS a result of…” Whatever the reason, for better or for worse, it seems to be where the party has gone.
We weren’t, actually. But your total lack of creativity and reliance on Republican stereotypes of those unlike them is welcomed by me for its complete predictablity.
All right, now I KNOW you’re lyin’, Lion!
He must have forgotten you are black, nyk, and therefore obviously drinking Schlitz. The racial stereotype always trumps the ideological one.
Rob #188 … agreed … see my #42 if you missed it earlier …
Chap … #178 …
Humorous but weak … I have come to expect better of you than that … you and I have had substantive and reasonable discussions here for a long time so I think I am entitled to say that …
Regardless of the fact the other “country” was Canada and therefore an ally the pipeline negotiations were still with a non-US government … (in fact Palin is the only one of the four people on the Prez ballot that can cite having actually negotiated and signed anything with the government of another country) … when that pipeline is completed and goes live it will have a major impact on energy supplies in the “lower 48″ …
Hmmm, bad news for Nobama today. The DOW is up, markets are happy with tightening polls.
McCain/Palin ‘08!
NYK is a master at slithering away from anything involving objectivity or facts. Look at post #145. He’s avoiding that one like the plague.
He and Watershed need to get together. he does the same thing.
Desert,
You took that comment WAYYY too seriously. I give Palin all the props in the world for whatever she negotiated with Canada.
The point is sport. It’s the millions of people like me that made this country so liberal leaches can try to suck it dry.
Is not a very good idea to try and link the dead-cat bounces of the market with the presidential polls. Just as quickly they will burn you, and you’ll have quite a bit of egg to wipe off your face.
Please ignore the Trolls, they are unable to see any of the GOOD that America has been blessed with. They do not believe that every American has the same opportunities for success and happiness no matter if we are born rich or poor. They ONLY see misery because they are miserable. They ONLY see injustice because they are failures. They will never feel the joy that a parent feels when their child rides a two wheeler for the first time, they ONLY feel contempt because somewhere there is a child who has no bike. So ignore the TROLLS, and pity them.
I wonder why some people think that you have to travel the globe in order to be educated or to understand the world. I understand that pork tastes good, but I have never wallowed in the mud with pigs. I’m not sure if that made sense, but I enjoyed typing it.
Let’s assume that McCain/Palin win. How much would it PO libtards if they play this at the inauguration?
From now until the election I am refraining from all resonable and substantive discussions.
All comments will be sarcasm and/or attempts at humor, so take them for what they are.
chap … duly noted … sorry about that … guess I took it wrongly due to another comment a little before yours denigrating my comment based on the fact the pipeline was not yet built … guess my humor sensor was out of whack …
On October 28th, 2008 at 3:04 pm, nyk said:
Please. I don’t think “liberals” — or the many other people who live outside of Alaska and perceive Sarah Palin as incompetent
film ladd/nyk et al; some of us are old enough to remember the last time we all needed to cure republican light government (1976) we had the world all set up to have carter win a landslide. won by less than 2% and his incompetence led to the worst economy we have had including now since 1930. 14% unemployment and home mortgages of 18% plus our military in such disarray it couldn’t rescue our embassy in iran from a bunch of students. this led to the next 38 years of conservative dominance of the government, the first time since the 20’s that happened. obama is carter’s second term.
Chapoutier – you’re my new Malkin hero, I think I need to follow your example.
Oh my god! What a joke. This women annoys the hell out of me. So does country music. I may be completely anti-liberal, and anti-democrat. But I will never be a redneck wanna be.
On October 28th, 2008 at 3:06 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:
Sorry Lion! Got wrapped up in the fun of going after trolls. Points well taken.
chap … alas … then I will sadly miss our reasonable and substantive discussions for the next week …
Absolutely, and there’s going to be a lot more problems than just this financial crisis that will manifest during his presidency. So now the question becomes, as I’ve been posting multiple time here: What will the Republican Party offer in 2012?
#208 I agree and appreciate you not linking markets and the polls. I hope people do not base financial decisions on such flimsy statements. Right now, fear and stupidity mostly explain the markets. Common Sense should rule, but it doesn’t. Thus the reason for this blog thread.
Don’t let the elitist bastards get you down Sarah . . . you have a very large army covering your backside.
McCain’s run for re-election
On October 28th, 2008 at 3:32 pm, Flyoverman said:
NYK also has difficulties with compassion and lashing out, me thinks:
On October 28th, 2008 at 2:53 pm, nyk said in post 147:
cheapseat … yep … carter brought us the CRA which was expanded by Clinton and led to the loosening of credit to the point we got the sub-prime housing crisis … not to mention gas lines, high unemployment, high interest rates and major economic problems …
remember them well …
Sorry, but things are just too “hot” around here right now to try to engage.
We’ll be able to discuss how I substantively and reasonably hate your freedoms but love your money post-apocalypse.
It really amazes me that people think the president single handedly has control and influence over the stock market or the global financial markets.
dream on chap … dream on …
I am hoping Palin gets her shot WAAAAAY before then.
I’m a married man. But, God help me, Sarah drives me wild… She exudes such fecundity…
Must….move….to….Alaska
Curious that someone who benefitted so much from unsealing other people’s court records would be so set on sealing his own.
On October 28th, 2008 at 3:37 pm, cheapseat said:
Maybe. He may also be The American Castro’s first term.
Given the Fairness Doctrine back on the table and severe collectivist socialism in vogue with the media… there may be no turning back, no chance for a new Reagan to come on the scene.
Instead of a cleansing effect, it may end up being fifty years of one party rule and the completion of a marxist takeover of the U.S.
I’m not willing to take that chance.
Disaggree Chap. I’m sure it was at least a nice boxed wine!
There’s a topical cream that should clear that right up in no time.
Well, the president can influence the markets, but as a rule, it’s usually only in a negative way. The entity that actually has the most control over the markets is the Federal Reserve, and they do whatever the hell they want.
Actually, there were MANY, but every time I include the links the post gets lost. Anyway — so I’ll cite the pollers (and the stats) and you can look them up to double check (just enter their named along with “Palin”):
CNN/Opinion Research Corp. (49% say not qualified)
Washington Post-ABC News (51% say they have a negative impression of her)
Associated Press-GfK (25% say she has experience for job)
Pew (51% negative)
Wall Street Journal/NBC News (49% say not qualified — and this one is from September)
Quinnipiac University/ Wall Street Journal (By a margin of 52%-42% women voters said that she isn’t qualified. In Michigan, by a margin of 50%-34% women said that she isn’t qualified. In Minnesota and Wisconsin, the margin was 49%-40%.)
There were similar outcomes (with more than 50% of respondents saying they did not believe her qualified to be VP) by Diageo/Hotline. All of these are online and easy to track down.
That wasn’t clear, sorry. I like the Commonperson appeal of Sara Palin. They’re my roots, too. I think we need a Commonperson with common sense to clean up Wash. DC.
Yawn!
Family Man, you need to redistribute your wealth to those behind you, to give them a chance, too. So, you can send me a check at ……
You liberals are really polluting this thread. I wouldn’t mind if only some of you creatures had any comprehension of economics or the U.S. Constitution.
Actually, I wasn’t even aware that was a stereotype. Never heard of it.
absolutely. do you think ayers would back anyone but a radical revolutionary marxist?
if obama wins the US is the USSA…freedom is done in this country, we abandon israel…and the Ezekiel scenario plays out with Israel, iran, russia…its gonna be a WILD RIDE!!
so good libs, NYK and CHAPOUTIER..tell me how anyone can be a liberal (socialist) it has FAILED over and over and over and over and over again…millions have died, and suffered..all to remake society into some socialist paradise.
your god (government) is a failure..yet you keep worshipping at the alter of socialism…amazing.
Chap knows them all. He will head the sterotype police in the Obama admin.
My post #238 was clarifying my #221, not NYK post #237.
Thanks for your response NYK. I also appreciate your correction to the term “not qualified” rather than your previous claim of “not competant.”
The sad and unfortunate part is that you will most likely be taking that chance no matter who wins. Socialism has been fully unleashed, and if history serves, it is extraordinarily hard to reverse course (without an actual revolution). The saddest thing about George W. Bush is that all the problems that are plaguing us are being blamed on Conservatism and the belief in free markets. The worst part of this crisis is that people are asking for socialism because they believe it will fix our problems, even though socialism is what brought them on. McCain has not only fully endorsed the bailouts and nationalizations, he’s proposed expanding them. If he gets voted in, where does the Republican party go from here? And how badly do we look after McCain’s brand of socialism fails? What is the best scenario for the future of the Republican party?
These libs are boring and monotonous.
I’d be more inclined to take your word for that if you demonstrated some intellectualism yourself. Or if the Palin critics did. But they seem to be simply brainless snobs. And none of them are exactly “prominent conservatives”.
On October 28th, 2008 at 2:53 pm, nyk said in comment 147…
…and ignored the plight of two people’s lives wrecked by collectivism as recounted in comment #186.
My collie says:
Sorry, but I thought this thread was just ACHING for a Princess Bride quote.
My collie says:
I also think the closer stats are from polls with less bias.
Competent. I find the words, in this context, to be synonymous. But as to the way the question was apparently posed, yes, “qualified” was actually used.
Sure. Knock yourself out. I don’t really care what you do. You wanna keep yourself busy writing the same thing over and over, have at it.
Well, yeah. And McCain was the preferred candidate of the Palin critics, of those “prominent conservatives” you cited.
It may not be the same as the best scenario for the future of conservatism, or of America. It’s easy to come up with a plan for the future of the GOP – formally adapt socialism.
On October 28th, 2008 at 3:59 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:
Lion, sorry I mistook you for a collectivist earlier. We are about 99% in agreement on everything you say. And I don’t have great answers for your questions, either…
All I can say is that I would rather vote for someone who practices socialism out of intellectual laziness and political expediency, than vote for someone that is a committed marxist who practices the teachings of Saul Alinsky.
The latter choice is so potentially dangerous that it could very well destroy the country, the last country where any freedom at all is left…
I didn’t know nyk was black, and I do know that mistressjustice is. I wonder who those two are going to vote for? They probably made their decision after a close study of the issues…
Kinda like “South Park”, what was the name of the token black kid on that show?
Apparently, he’ll have to take that one, because I haven’t properly memorized all the stereotypes I’d need to do the job. I should start studying now…
Actually, I did, Rob (you see, I’m a social liberal, so not just any Democrat will do for me). I know, as you outright stated the other day, you long for an America with no blacks or Latinos, yet we persist in remaining. Good luck with that, though.
On October 28th, 2008 at 4:03 pm, nyk said:
Great! And it’s really no trouble at all, just a copy and paste.
And I still don’t hear any compassion whatsoever for the two lives of many wrecked by your ideology.
On October 28th, 2008 at 2:53 pm, nyk said in comment 147…
…and ignored the plight of two people’s lives wrecked by collectivism as recounted in comment #186.
nyk
And what would you know about being an intellectual? You’re the heir to the Nazi and Communist cadres of the 1940’s. In your entire life you have never had an intellectual thought. You exist to repeat the talking points which others have programmed you with, nothing more.
BTW, you know who else expressed a profound disdain of intellectualism? Particularly when it positioned itself so as to be a stumbling block for the common people?
My collie says:
My collie is smarter than most of the people that we now have representing us in Washington D.C.
My collie says:
Please. You youths are to busy clogging the intertubes with “twitters” and porn to really study the issues.*
*This stereotype brought to you by Obama for America.
I guess if posts had to be interesting this blog would be empty but for a few. Who in their right mind would read a 150 word post about poll percentages on Sarah Palin. Seriously, step back and really give that some thought. Before anyone starts flaming me, I agree, mine aren’t much better but I can do it in 30 words or less.
Well, they say they are. But bear in mind that lefties lie as naturally as fish swim.
That racist moron Digshot is black though.
nyk
Hay kid. There is already over 12 trillion dollars that has moved to off-shore accounts in the last fifteen years. Doesn’t ever occur to you that if your Obama is elected those who can, WILL move a few trillion more out of this country leaving the socialist little to play with.
THINK!
Enjoy, then!
You mean slapping the “commie” label on any and everything those on the right disagree with is new and novel, even, a sign of intellect? Because I think a couple of the people blacklisted by HUAC might disagree with you…
Oh — and congratulations on being the googolplex person to refer to someone who disagrees with you as a “Nazi,” btw.
Classic.
All right, in all seriousness, I apologize for incorporating nyk’s race into one of my posts.
She didn’t bring it up and I think we all should get off it.
Sorry, nyk. I was only trying to make a joke.
Is that true, Mistress Justice? I didn’t know that.
A very fair point. It seems that the term ‘conservative’ has been completely rendered devoid of any meaning. When someone can support our government nationalizing any sector of our economy, it should instantly expose them as fundamentally anti-conservative. It seems now that anyone who fundamentally believes in true conservatism, is labeled a Libertarian.
It’s “Hey,” btw. And why do you keep addressing things to me if you find me to be such a moron? Ignore me, in the way I already ignore you. I don’t want to waste my time on you and I’m sure you feel the same.
Sheesh.
Did you forget what site you’re on? Seriously?
there is going to be a job open up there when he goes to jail folks up there need to write in sarah would that be wild
I have to reread the methodology to know for sure. I also know that polls easy to find on the internet and how to find them. But as you were the first to make the claims, I thought it polite and ask you the study(s) to which you were referring. Telling me how easy they are to find was condescending.
All that being said, I would agree that you have more than adequately backed up your claim that the people surveyed have doubts about her. It does not prove she is not capable, but at this point she has a lot to prove and little time to prove it.
This is only partially true.
Um…hopefully — and I’m guessing here — the person who asked me directly to cite the polls on Sarah Palin that I was referring to.
The trolls over at HotAir are more creative. They actually came up with a GEM this morning. I’d like it so much, that I have adopted it as my very own.
My collie says:
Hah! Let’s see the pathetic trolls on THIS site come up with anything THAT good.
The people blacklisted by HUAC were in fact communists. I guess that information never penetrated your hive.
I see that you are as illiterate as ever. But thanks to affirmative action I suppose you were given a college degree.
I did not call you a Nazi. I said that your thought processes, if that’s not too grand a term for them, are analogous to those of the Nazi’s. (And the communists, though you did not object to that part.)
I said that you display all the “intellectualism” of a piece of software. I said that you are incapable of saying anything except what your programmers fed into you.
And you prove me correct everyday.
sorry forgot to put his name ted sevens
Race baiter. Like
cult leaderfather…likecult followerson.Frankly, I’m not a Sarah Palin fan, and I do question her readiness. But I’ll bet you dollars to doughnuts that the McCain staff has mucked this up far more than she could’ve alone. I have a feeling they’ve done more to damage her image than if she’d been left to her own devices. But such is the way of politics, I guess. Advice from all sides, not all of it good.
MissCheryl – I asked NYK for the stats in order for him to back up his claim that people dont think Palin is competant. I appreciated it and I read it.
I also appreciate the one liners and the good humor on this site. What I dont appreciate is the name calling and lame stereotyping that often goes on here and I hope others dont either because it brings us down to their level.
No. I’m not getting into that here, but no. Libertarianism as it exists today is just another species of left-wing thought. Check out all the socialists and communists at Lew Rockwell if you don’t believe me.
That why (conspiracy theory alert!) One World Government is so important to these people.
nyk
Ya your right for the first time.
You are a mentally bankrupted person and I won’t waste my time with the likes of you.
Obama, the brotha you would most like to kick it with while slammin’
a “40″… and a little spilled on the ground for the homies shot for being down with the hood.
No, I got a degree because I basically got a 4.0 GPA since birth. But nice try, in your own narrow way.
Did you say that you regurgitate conservative “insults” repeated ad nauseum here? I don’t know when the last time was that you had an original thought, but I imagine it was long before I started posting on this site. Anyway, you already know I think you’re an idiot, so there’s no reason for me to restate it.
Did you get a chance to read — or have read to you — that Jesse Helms book?
I’d take that a lot more seriously if you were not supporting an inexperienced candidate on the basis of his skin color. And, of course, his “social liberalism”, aka racism.
Glad you read!
Yeah. Happens a lot here, though.
Actually this is fairly old now, and not original to hot air.
I agree 100% with you here – I think that’s why we’ve been seeing so many reports of Palin going ‘rogue’.
I really could careless what you like or do not like – the arrogance by some on this blog is amazing….