Comments on: Snort of the day http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/snort-of-the-day-2/ news and commentary from a conservative perspective Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:36:43 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Snort of the day « Top Daily Digest Reading http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/snort-of-the-day-2/comment-page-2/#comment-554834 Snort of the day « Top Daily Digest Reading Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:25:35 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17729#comment-554834 [...] Read about it here. [...] [...] Read about it here. [...]

]]> By: PELOSI AND REID OFFER OBAMA REIGN AS VIRTUAL DICTATOR « EYE ON OBAMA http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/snort-of-the-day-2/comment-page-2/#comment-521773 PELOSI AND REID OFFER OBAMA REIGN AS VIRTUAL DICTATOR « EYE ON OBAMA Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:00:03 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17729#comment-521773 [...] Snort of the day [...] [...] Snort of the day [...]

]]> By: Pelosi’s new bipartisanship | skewred.com http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/snort-of-the-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-521456 Pelosi’s new bipartisanship | skewred.com Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:39:03 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17729#comment-521456 [...] Pelosi assures us that if the Democrats are elected, “Congress of the United States will be more [...] [...] Pelosi assures us that if the Democrats are elected, “Congress of the United States will be more [...]

]]> By: englishqueen01 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/snort-of-the-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-521158 englishqueen01 Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:08:31 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17729#comment-521158 Late to the game on this one, so I'm sure it was addressed above, but this is further proof the Democrats' definition of "bipartisanship" is doing whatever they want. True, perhaps, that McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time. But Obama voted the party line 100% of the time. Last I checked, 10% is still greater than 0%. But given Obama's economic policies, math doesn't seem like his strongsuit. Late to the game on this one, so I’m sure it was addressed above, but this is further proof the Democrats’ definition of “bipartisanship” is doing whatever they want.

True, perhaps, that McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time. But Obama voted the party line 100% of the time.

Last I checked, 10% is still greater than 0%. But given Obama’s economic policies, math doesn’t seem like his strongsuit.

]]> By: GraniteMan http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/snort-of-the-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-521006 GraniteMan Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:32:54 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17729#comment-521006 If Nancy and Schumer get their wish it will present an unsurmountable problem for them! With a Dem Pres. House, Senate when things go sour and their ratings are lower than they are now <strong><em><blockquote>Who the Hell will they blame??? If Nancy and Schumer get their wish it will present an unsurmountable problem for them! With a Dem Pres. House, Senate when things go sour and their ratings are lower than they are now


Who the Hell will they blame???

]]> By: Michelle Malkin » Schumer: Surrender to one-party rule or else http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/snort-of-the-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-520978 Michelle Malkin » Schumer: Surrender to one-party rule or else Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:18:43 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17729#comment-520978 [...] that total Democrat control will mean a Congress that is the most “bipartisan” ever. (link) Now, Sen. Chuck Schumer tells us that American cannot afford anything other than complete [...] [...] that total Democrat control will mean a Congress that is the most “bipartisan” ever. (link) Now, Sen. Chuck Schumer tells us that American cannot afford anything other than complete [...]

]]> By: chefantwon http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/snort-of-the-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-520104 chefantwon Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:49:37 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17729#comment-520104 I find it rather interesting that Nacy would be spouting that crap after saying that the Dems would work with republican's when she was selected as speaker. The exact opposite was what happened. They forced legislation down our throats without any debate. Of course the MSM will not say a word on how ineffective congress has been under her leadership or the fact that their approval ratings are the worst in history. Nancy and her lib friends want control of everything including control of my 401k money. Well when Nancy pants tries to get a hold of MY money, I'll make it dissapear. The government has proven itself useless in running any program let alone trying obtain extra funds by raiding peoples life savings. Mark my words IF they try this takeover of 401k funds, Dems won't be in power much longer and this time it will be for more than just a few terms. I find it rather interesting that Nacy would be spouting that crap after saying that the Dems would work with republican’s when she was selected as speaker. The exact opposite was what happened. They forced legislation down our throats without any debate.

Of course the MSM will not say a word on how ineffective congress has been under her leadership or the fact that their approval ratings are the worst in history.

Nancy and her lib friends want control of everything including control of my 401k money. Well when Nancy pants tries to get a hold of MY money, I’ll make it dissapear. The government has proven itself useless in running any program let alone trying obtain extra funds by raiding peoples life savings. Mark my words IF they try this takeover of 401k funds, Dems won’t be in power much longer and this time it will be for more than just a few terms.

]]> By: Seymour Nuts » Blog Archive » Bombarded by Stupidity http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/snort-of-the-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-519888 Seymour Nuts » Blog Archive » Bombarded by Stupidity Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:33:25 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17729#comment-519888 [...] Sample of the Queen Bee and her bipartisanship. [...] [...] Sample of the Queen Bee and her bipartisanship. [...]

]]> By: Pelosi: Give Democrats More Control So Congress Can Be Bipartisan http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/snort-of-the-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-519815 Pelosi: Give Democrats More Control So Congress Can Be Bipartisan Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:01:36 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17729#comment-519815 [...] attention this morning was Nancy Pelosi, who provided us with yet another laughable statement. In Pelosi’s American, the term “bipartisan” appears to be synonymous with totalitaria.... “Elect us, hold us accountable, and make a judgment and then go from there. But I do tell you [...] [...] attention this morning was Nancy Pelosi, who provided us with yet another laughable statement. In Pelosi’s American, the term “bipartisan” appears to be synonymous with totalitaria…. “Elect us, hold us accountable, and make a judgment and then go from there. But I do tell you [...]

]]> By: Nancy Pelosi Doesn’t Know The Meaning Of The Word ‘Bipartisan’ « Beltway Snark http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/snort-of-the-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-519687 Nancy Pelosi Doesn’t Know The Meaning Of The Word ‘Bipartisan’ « Beltway Snark Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:23:21 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17729#comment-519687 [...] writing to inform you that you have used a word incorrectly. You stated that one-party rule would bring about bipartianship. That would be the incorrect word to use here; I believe the word you were looking for is [...] [...] writing to inform you that you have used a word incorrectly. You stated that one-party rule would bring about bipartianship. That would be the incorrect word to use here; I believe the word you were looking for is [...]

]]> By: mytake http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/snort-of-the-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-519332 mytake Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:12:38 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17729#comment-519332 As you know I just enjoy calling Pelosi a twit (while I still can). As you know I just enjoy calling Pelosi a twit (while I still can).

]]> By: mytake http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/snort-of-the-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-519328 mytake Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:11:02 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17729#comment-519328 And wasn't already bipartisan when the Democrats forced more Republicans to vote for the bailout so they wouldn't take all the heat? And wasn’t already bipartisan when the Democrats forced more Republicans to vote for the bailout so they wouldn’t take all the heat?

]]> By: mytake http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/snort-of-the-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-519323 mytake Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:07:59 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17729#comment-519323 I'm confused. If there are more Democrats in the next session how is that more bipartisan? What is the definition of bipartisan? Does it not mean two parties? What is the definition of "is"? I don't understand English when these Democrats try to explain these concepts. Am I just incurably dense or is this really just crapola coming out of a twit? I’m confused. If there are more Democrats in the next session how is that more bipartisan? What is the definition of bipartisan? Does it not mean two parties? What is the definition of “is”? I don’t understand English when these Democrats try to explain these concepts. Am I just incurably dense or is this really just crapola coming out of a twit?

]]> By: keystone http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/snort-of-the-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-519313 keystone Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:59:19 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17729#comment-519313 That is too funny! That is too funny!

]]> By: Rogue Cheddar http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/snort-of-the-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-519254 Rogue Cheddar Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:24:28 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=17729#comment-519254 <blockquote>On October 28th, 2008 at 1:40 pm, rooster said: On October 28th, 2008 at 12:44 pm, Just A Grunt said: Hold them accountable huh? Rangel Jefferson Hastings Mahoney Murtha Dodd *chirp* *chirp* Senator Stevens of Alaska…..whabammmm, quicker than a new york minute. </blockquote> The difference is, Stevens <em>is</em> being held accountable. We'll just chalk this up to a retorical flourish gone awry.

On October 28th, 2008 at 1:40 pm, rooster said:
On October 28th, 2008 at 12:44 pm, Just A Grunt said:
Hold them accountable huh?
Rangel
Jefferson
Hastings
Mahoney
Murtha
Dodd

*chirp* *chirp*
Senator Stevens of Alaska…..whabammmm, quicker than a new york minute.

The difference is, Stevens is being held accountable.
We’ll just chalk this up to a retorical flourish gone awry.

]]>