Notorious Obamedia moments of 2008

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 29, 2008 05:05 AM


In the tank.

My syndicated column today takes you on a brief tour of some of the most shameful Obamedia moments of 2008. Topping the list: The Los Angeles Times’ suppression of the Obama/Khalidi/Ayers-Dohrn videotape. The blogosphere has been pounding the story, with Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft leading the way. The Times claims it promised a source it wouldn’t show the tape. Can you imagine them abiding by similar conditions if they had a damning McCain/Palin video in hand? Now, reward offers for the missing video are pouring in: see Newt Gingrich; Ace; Dirty Harry; and JWR.

And another reward offer: $150,000.

I repeat: Bleeding newspapers really shouldn’t be pissing off readers. Same goes for the rest of the flailing old media.

No matter. They will cling bitterly to their drool cups until pried from their cold, dead hands.

***

Notorious Obamedia Moments of 2008
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2008

To paraphrase Queen Elizabeth II, 2008 is not a year on which honest journalists shall look back with undiluted pleasure. This has turned out to be even more of an annus horribilis than 2004, when Dan Rather’s fake Bush/National Guard memo fiasco redefined the “BS” in CBS News. There were so many mainstream journalists swimming in the Democrat tank this year, the nation’s newsrooms looked more like overcrowded aquariums at Petsmart.

In less than a week, the campaign season will be over. But the Obamedia’s most shameful biases and notorious blunders shall not be forgotten. Here’s my top five list, by no means comprehensive and in no particular order:

1. The Los Angeles Times and the suppressed Obama/Jew-bash videotape. In April, L.A. Times reporter Peter Wallsten reported on a 2003 farewell party for radical Palestinian Liberation Organization spokesman/adviser-turned-Ivy League professor Rashid Khalidi. The gala was sponsored by the virulently anti-Israel Arab American Action Network. In attendance: good neighbors Barack Obama and Weather Underground terrorist duo Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

Wallsten reported that the “event was videotaped, and a copy of the tape was obtained by The Times.” But the news organization refuses to let readers watch the video of Barack and his left-wing terrorist friends for themselves and will not release the tape. It’s “old news” now.

The paper had no problem, however, embedding a clip of Sarah Palin’s 1984 swimsuit pageant video on its gossip blog and deeming it newsworthy.

2.Ogling Obama. In May, CNN posted “breaking news video” of female journalists on Obama’s press plane moaning and fawning over the Democratic presidential candidate as he talked on his cell phone. The caption listed on the network’s website: “Obama in jeans: Sen. Barack Obama surprises the press corps by wearing jeans.”

In the clip, several members of the press corps yell at a Secret Service agent to “sit down” because she’s obstructing their view of their beloved Obama. You can hear the journalists giggle and sigh as Obama straddles across a row of seats and they furiously click away on their cameras. “You’re killing us,” one of them truckles breathlessly.

No, you’re killing yourselves.

Runners-up for Most Drool-Covered groupies: The journalist who squealed “He touched me!” at the UNITY minority journalists’ convention in July; the MSNBC producer who broke down and shed tears of joy upon learning that The One had clinched the Democrat presidential nomination; MSNBC host Chris Matthews, who proclaimed that he “felt a thrill up his leg” after an Obama speech in February; Oprah Winfrey, who confessed she did a “happy dance” for Obama; and the writer for the German publication, BILD, who worked out with Obama at the Ritz Carlton in Berlin and reported: “I put my arm around his hip – wow, he didn’t even sweat! WHAT A MAN!’”

3.The Atlantic Monthly’s deranged photographer. Publisher David Bradley’s once-esteemed magazine hired celebrity lenswoman Jill Greenberg to snap portraits of John McCain. Greenberg, an outspoken left-winger who goaded children into crying on film and captioned the images with anti-Bush slogans, sabotaged the photo shoot and gloated about it on a photo industry website. After tricking McCain into standing over a strobe light to create ugly shadows on his face, she then posted vandalized versions of the McCain imagery on her personal website with crude, vulgar labels and Photoshopping. One featured McCain with fangs and blood dripping down his mouth – with the Greenberg-added words, “I am a bloodthirsty warmongerer (sic).”

Another piece of her “art” showed an ape (a favorite Greenberg subject) defecating on McCain’s head. The highly respected editors at the highly respected Atlantic professed shock, despite Greenberg’s notoriety. The name of her blog: “Manipulator.”

4.The quote doctors and the math manglers at CNN. In a botched attack on Sarah Palin, CNN reporter Drew Griffin cited National Review writer Byron York allegedly questioning her abilities and character: “The National Review had a story saying that, you know, I can’t tell if Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, or all of the above?” York, however, was characterizing the press coverage of Palin, not speaking for himself.

In a botched tally, CNN anchor Soledad O’Brien proclaimed an audience poll showed “overwhelming” preference for Joe Biden after the vice presidential debate. A freeze frame of the show of hands, however, showed the audience split. The mathematically-challenged O’Brien also claimed that Palin slashed Alaska’s special needs budget by 62 percent (which she recycled from the liberal Daily Kos blog), despite the fact that the governor increased special needs funding by 12 percent. Facts, schmacts.

5. Us Magazine and publisher Jann Wenner’s Obama apparatchiks. The gossip mag’s September partisan slime job on Sarah Palin and her family (“Babies, lies, and scandal”) – which opened the floodgates of Palin-bashing across the mainstream media — was a nadir of the year. Prominent Obama backer Wenner, who ran countless hagiographies of Obama in sister publication Rolling Stone and featured the Obamas with the slavering headline “Why Barack Loves Her” on Us magazine’s June cover, had his media flack e-mail the anti-Palin hit piece to all media in St. Paul for the Republican National Convention:

“Might be useful as an illustration of how the news is playing out,” the flack wrote.

Indeed, the side-by-side covers of the Palin smears and the Obamas’ deification illustrate the year in Obamedia perfectly.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Obama’s hate-filled Lying Slaves and Law-breaking Shills « Mark Epstein
  2. Notorious Obamedia moments of 2008 | Citizen-Right
  3. Obama’s Associates Reveal Him; Can you name them?: « Riggword Weblog
  4. Around The Campaign 2008 Sphere
  5. Obama and 7 Things God Hates “Updated”: « Riggword Weblog
  6. Michelle Malkin: Notorious Obamedia Moments of 2008 « NObama - Not Now, Not Ever
  7. Kinda Says it All |
  8. Coverup! LA Times suppresses incriminating obama video « nn&v
  9. L.A. Times: No Video For You; Come Back One Year! *UPDATED* « Pocket Change - Now Lint Free!
  10. Seymour Nuts » Blog Archive » Bombarded by Stupidity
  11. Some Random Items in Today’s News | Sparty
  12. Scroll For Updates..LA Times: Our source for the Khalidi tape made us promise not to release it | Right Voices
  13. Michelle Malkin » Send Wolf Blitzer your questions for Obama
  14. Notorious Obamedia moments of 2008 « Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian
  15. Obama is Bringing Sexlebrity Back « Trust, But Verify
  16. The Dan Lee Report » Blog Archive » LA Times covering for Obama & suppressing Damning Video
  17. The words of Wendy Button; A woman’s thoughts about Democratic party politics « Northern Thoughts And Reflections
  18. Suitably Flip
  19. Another Reason Not to Watch Obama This Evening « Trust, But Verify
  20. Wednesday October 29, 2008 « Quipster
  21. The middle-of-the-road centrist, Barack Obama « Crazymountain’s Blog
  22. Wake up America-Contact Times-Demand Release
  23. Obama EATING Game: TONIGHT! ! ! TIME 8PM SHARP « Dianej’s Weblog
  24. Be afraid of Barack Obama’s America « THE “G” BLOG @WordPress.com
  25. Be afraid of Barack Obama’s America | Ron Paul War Room
  26. Ed Driscoll.com
  27. THE GUN TOTING LIBERAL™
  28. ANSWERS For The Faith » Blog Archive » -Obama Video: Shame Shame on the LA Times-No Longer Credible!
  29. News Channel 5 Missouri Embarrasses Itself With Obama Interview
  30. ChooseTheHero.com » Blog Archive » Contact LA Times- Ask Them To Release Obama/Rashid Khalidi Video
  31. Neues von The One » Gegenstimme
  32. Obama Briefs « Currently Off The Wall’s Weblog
  33. Michelle Malkin » Obama thanks his biggest supporters: The press
  34. You’ve got to love it « The Constitution Club
  35. Notorious Obamedia moments of 2008 « Top Daily Digest Reading
  36. Michelle Malkin » Swooning WaPo cheers Savior-in-Chief: “There goes our journalistic objectivity”

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #520438
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:29 pm, granite said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 12:11 pm, sambo said:

    granite said:
    Are you not reminded just a little of the kids in high school who would go out of their way, who would make an effort, to be annoying…for no other reason than to annoy?

    and always with a teacher or administrator in sight!

    Sounds about right.

    I wonder, if in addition to actively trying their best to annoy, they weren’t also the type in high school that would get beaten up just for the hell of it.
    I used to think that they didn’t deserve to get beaten up; now, I’m not so sure….

  2. #520446
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:31 pm, granite said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:27 pm, fulldroolcup said:

    …the ur-troll. He’s program to send, not to receive, and certainly not to think or communicate.

    Sort of like a read-only CD-ROM.

    Good one!

    Deserves a rimshot!

  3. #520448
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:32 pm, watershed said:

    #277

    And yes, I read it and responded.

    http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/28/obama-cultists-cry-wolf-n-word-yelled-at-palin-rally-not/comment-page-4/#comment-519398

    And the post directly below it as well, for good measure.

  4. #520450
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:32 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:19 pm, watershed said:

    The best part? You haven’t even the insight to see the historical import of the comparison!

    It was already addressed. How did you get this job with this aversion to reading that you seem to have?

    Was it some kind of nepotism thing? A campaign manager at the Obama camp had a good-for-nothing nephew that couldn’t get work or something?

    Are you getting paid for the post like ACORN pays for a completed registration form?

    I will get a “you’re a moron” mostly, or at best a “its OK because…it just IS” kind of post, but NO-ONE here sees the comparison!

    Your debate style is so MSNBC. If you’d actually engage people on what they write or don’t, then you would get fewer comments in regards to your mental capacity.

    I understand it is hard to be creative with your kommissar campaign manager breathing over your neck as you type on the computer, but try to relax and really engage.

    They won’t throw you in prison for making a mistake. Not yet anyway.

  5. #520464
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:36 pm, watershed said:

    #283

    I answered your question. Go look! I guess just not, what, troll-y enough?

    And the charge that I am HIDING is of course wackadoo, as I am the most conspicuous poster here, John Deaux. that’s not really gonna stick in my craw, or hold up to scrutiny.

    Chill. I get a LOT of responses. Most are the “you’re an idiot” kind, granted, but othe ones I do respond to take time.

  6. #520466
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:36 pm, emjem24 said:

    watershed said:
    #199

    Strawman.

    The tax burden will be SHIFTED to the wealthy from the middle class. SOCIALISM is your word.

    Health care should be a right for every American. Choosing an ideology over the well being of your fellow Americans is in my view, sociopathic and at the very least, unpatriotic. But this place stalked and hounded a sick 12 year old boy and his family for months, so I should probably know who I am talking to!

    How is health care a right? How is it fair to make Americans pay for others’ healthcare? How? The federal government can’t run the post office or the school system efficiently, what makes you think healthcare will fare any better? Just because you want a freebie doesn’t mean that everybody else has to pay for it.

    If you think the tax burden will actully be “shifted” from the middle class to the wealthy, then you haven’t mastered mathematics all that well. Why is Biden lowering the salary of those who must be taxed from 250k to 150k. What will be the effect of the wealthy paying more taxes? What is plan B if Obummer doesn’t get all the funding for the “fairness” he envisions?

    How much of the military will Obummer cut to refashion America? I’m not talking about Iraq here either. How less safe will we be when Obummer sticks it to the military like Clinton did?

    It reflects you well when you think it’s fair for one group of people to pay virtually all the taxes while everybody else lives off of their ingenuity, risk, and success. It reveals the true nature of human weakness that the Obummer candidacy appeals to. Obummer is popular with low-income, minorities, even the educated who think freebies are great as long as they don’t have to pick up the tab.

    It didn’t work in Europe. That’s why their economies (except Ireland) are stagnant and why their social welfare states are having trouble paying for their socialized healthcare system (just look at Great Britain).

  7. #520469
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:37 pm, farmgal said:

    Great article Michelle! I hope that the media is one of the biggest losers in this election,besides Obama of course.

  8. #520474
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:38 pm, watershed said:

    #287

    OBAMA PLANT!!!! LOL. Totally awesome. Boy, you nailed it! that sure makes ME look bad, and doesnt sound paranoid or fringe-y AT ALL.

    just a guy discussing politics on the ol internets.

  9. #520481
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:39 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:32 pm, watershed said:

    And the post directly below it as well, for good measure.

    Got it, thanks. My but you are a busy little collectivist aren’t you? Type, collectivist, type! But try to read once in a while too…

  10. #520483
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:42 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:38 pm, watershed said:

    OBAMA PLANT!!!! LOL. Totally awesome. Boy, you nailed it! that sure makes ME look bad, and doesnt sound paranoid or fringe-y AT ALL.

    Yes I thought it was funny too. You also seem to have no sense of humor. That was a joke. Well I guess we’re stuck with our version of Keith Olbermann right here on Malkin’s site.

    Type little collectivist, type!

  11. #520485
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:42 pm, FamilyMan said:

    farmgal said:
    I hope that the media is one of the biggest losers in this election,besides Obama of course.

    They have already lost a large percentage of readers and views in the last 12 months.
    Small steps to big victories.

  12. #520497
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:46 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Ya. Watershed appears to have a major problem. Arsonist mentality is my best diagnoses.
    What do you think folks.

  13. #520500
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:47 pm, John Deaux said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:36 pm, watershed said:
    #283

    I answered your question. Go look! I guess just not, what, troll-y enough?

    You told me that socialism is my word, that’s all. That’s not an answer.

    How are redistribution of income and guaranteed health care not socialist?

  14. #520501
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:48 pm, flmom said:

    Waterspout said: just a guy discussing politics spouting Democratic talking points on the ol internets.

    You don’t have to thank me.

  15. #520507
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:49 pm, emjem24 said:

    Watershed #276:

    I think your comparison is lacking in both historical relevance and factual argument. The ’60’s overtuned not just political but social/sexual mores. It’s the sort of thing that happened after the Bolsheviks took over after the Russian Revolution.

    If Obummer tries to overturn people’s RIGHTS and not just political, social, or cultural mores, there will be consequences. How would you feel if government started doing the following:

    1. Institute the Fairness Doctrine so that only one political viewpoint colors the commentary and coverage.

    2. Take away peoples’ guns so that they cannot protect themselves or go hunting.

    3. Overly tax a citizen to make things so fair that everyone is equally poor and miserable.

    4. Downsize the military so that the country can no longer protect itself.

    If Obummer crosses the line into something not quite so democratic, do you think the military will stand for it? The military already doesn’t trust Obummer so will they follow someone who takes their fellow citizens’ rights away?

    The first American revolution was about taxation without representation. What you fail to recognize is that there are many Americans who resent being taxed for things they’ve already paid for (like vehicles). People are voting based on emotion, not reason. If that emotion turns into something significantly less harmonious like a deep recession, steep job losses, and a depletion of rights in favor of equal poverty, what recourse will Americans have?

  16. #520509
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:52 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:46 pm, FamilyMan said:

    I think we should put it out of its misery.
    What? Being threatened was the impetus for his disappearance the last time. 8-)

  17. #520513
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:53 pm, cicerokid said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 10:31 am, watershed said:
    #116

    “I know you think that a living wage and education and health care are all bad things for every American to have, I just don’t know why.”

    Do you know

    anyone

    that does not have this now? Then define:

    Living wage.

    Education.

    Health care.

    Define these, then again, tell me you know ONE person that does not have all of the above.

  18. #520516
    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:54 pm, jedijson said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 1:47 pm, John Deaux said:

    How are redistribution of income and guaranteed health care not socialist?

    Because Obamarx says their not. Obamarxism isn’t socialism. It’s…what did The One call it? ‘Trickle Up’ economics?

    po-ta-to/po-tah-to.

  19. #520528
    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:00 pm, chefantwon said:

    Watershed, while the notion of government providing health care to everyone may be of benefit to some folks, the majority of us will end up hurting because of it. It is evident that you have never used any government assistance as you would know that the reality of government health care is a freaking nightmare.

    I am a veteran, while in the military, there were long waites, poor service, and doctors that if they made a mistake, could not be brought to trial. Please look at other countries that provide health care to everyone. Why are these folks coming here to have operations? Because of they would end up dead waiting for someone to do the operation in their own country.

    One fact you ARE missing here is the fact hospitals treat anyone REGUARDLESS of the ability to pay. Where do you think those 12 million illegals get their treatment from?

    Government has proven time and time again they can’t run anything effectively and you want them running your health care program?

    My health care provider will use me for a lab rat, treating me with experimental drugs with out my consent. If those doctors screw up and end up either killing or maiming me for life, I can’t sue them. Not to mention trying to even get an appointment for someone to actually see me if I’m sick. Guess who my primary health care provider is….

    The Veterans Administration!

  20. #520530
    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:01 pm, b-cat said:

    Rights are God-given and not anything that costs someone else for it to be attained. Therefore any type of service is not a right as it requires someone else to provide the service.

  21. #520537
    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:02 pm, PRCalDude said:

    I like the US Weekly title for Obama:

    “Why Barack Loves Her.” No really, why? What’s not to love about a shrew who lights her husband up in public?

  22. #520542
    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:04 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    Interesting that conservatives always choose to see the “tank” half full. If the LA Times were really in it to elect Obama, they wouldn’t have run the story in the first place.

    Example #999,988 of Michelle Malkin fabricating hysteria out of surmise.

  23. #520551
    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:07 pm, FamilyMan said:

    watershed said:
    “I know you think that a living wage and education and health care are all bad things for every American to have, I just don’t know why.”

    This FamilyWomen;
    We never said that those are bad things you moron. We said the constitution should not guarantee them.
    You may now have the keyboard back dear.

  24. #520553
    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:07 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:04 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    Interesting that conservatives always choose to see the “tank” half full. If the LA Times were really in it to elect Obama, they wouldn’t have run the story in the first place.

    Example #999,988 of Michelle Malkin fabricating hysteria out of surmise.

    Aw shoot, did watershed get off work? Are you now sitting at his computer terminal?

    Suggestion: use Lysol on the keyboard before you start typing. Shared keyboards can be terribly filthy.

  25. #520558
    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:09 pm, Misscheryl said:

    This FamilyWomen;
    We never said that those are bad things you moron. We said the constitution should not guarantee them.
    You may now have the keyboard back dear.

    That cracks me up!! Welcome aboard FamilyWoman…just watch out for the trooollllllssssss

  26. #520570
    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:14 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Misscheryl My wife is always here. She’s a good strong conservative woman. I’m really fortunate to be married to her.

  27. #520582
    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:17 pm, old_texan said:

    The emperor has no clothes! But you think the coolaid drinking, lemmings of the leftist-socialist democrat party can see it. NAAAA. He’s the one. And gosh he held a rally in jeans….ya’ll jeans…oh the man is soooooo coooool.

    Not.

  28. #520585
    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:18 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:14 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Misscheryl My wife is always here. She’s a good strong conservative woman. I’m really fortunate to be married to her.

    You better complement her when she’s that close to the monitor Familyman! Kudos to you!

    Now that I think of it I think I owe my wife a good complement or something too.

    I hope there’s not some anniversary I’m forgetting or something…

  29. #520597
    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:23 pm, old_texan said:

    We have a saying in Texas about people that are not what they say they are….

    All hat and no cattle…. pretenders

    ’nuff said.

  30. #520643
    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:35 pm, FamilyMan said:

    FilmLadd said; You better complement her when she’s that close to the monitor Familyman!

    She agrees and adds that you better not forget your anniversary.

  31. #520668
    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:46 pm, old_texan said:

    Here is a good read about what we can expect with Obama at the helm.

    Obama’s Constitution

  32. #520678
    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:50 pm, frontierguy said:

    If there is a right to welfare, then the people of America should have a right to productivity from welfare recipients. Report to the welfare office then wait for the worker’s bus to shuttle them off to a fair days work for a fair wage. Most of the illegal aliens in this country at least do work, and if the illegal alien gets the oval office he should honor their work ethic by enforcing it on everyone.

  33. #520687
    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:53 pm, cheapseat said:

    watershed, you haven’t discussed why 10% tax cuts for the poorest, 5%tax cuts for the next poorest group and 3% tax cuts for the highest income is only a tax cut for the rich? why do we have to subsidize opera and orchestra but not sports teams. oh yeah you will talk about the stadium financing being subsidy, but that generally is because the city wants the parking, food and rent fees not to mention the hiring of the POOR in these jobs. i’ve been on these boards, and the owners state unequivically that if they are going to build the stadium, it won’t be in the ghetto of downtown anywhere, but will be in the suburbs where the people are. you really can’t believe that the 90’s was eutopia, obviously you didn’t work in the tech sector or have investments in nasdaq. clinton kept the reagan tax cuts EXCEPT he raised the top rate 3% up, but it was still 30+ % lower than when reagan took over. and the reagan economy with a few hicups is still bringing prosperity to the u.s. today. todays housing/banking debacle is socialism (housing and loans for everyone whether they can afford it or not) driven. EVERY factual analysis of todays economy shows we are considerably better off than we were in the 60’s, the 70’s, the 80’s or the 90’s. education, life expectancy (health care), home ownership, salaries, taxes paid, etc. the problem has always been and it is not a liberal vs conservative problem but a congressman problem that they can’t resist spending more money than they take in to assure we are all willing to reelect them. dems give to teachers, lawyers, gays, blacks, their constituency and it’s causes, while republicans give to military, business, and their constituency and it’s causes. together they can outspend any budget. a look at the budgets of every president since nixon has shown the amount of increase in the debt has risen by a very similar amount right up to this GINORMOUS bailout of the last month. you can count on a doubling of the debt for every 4 year presidential term since nixon regardless of party.

  34. #520689
    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:54 pm, sonofdy said:

    She agrees and adds that you better not forget your anniversary.

    Exactly why I got married on my birthday.

    I never forget.

  35. #520712
    On October 29th, 2008 at 3:04 pm, gippergirl said:

    Anyone want to tell the LA Times what they think?…(from FoxNews’s website):

    Tell the LA Times What You Think by e-mailing the paper’s “readers’ representative,” Jamie Gold, at readers.rep@latimes.com or call to leave a message with Gold at (877) 554-4000.

  36. #520753
    On October 29th, 2008 at 3:19 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:54 pm, sonofdy said:

    She agrees and adds that you better not forget your anniversary.

    Exactly why I got married on my birthday.

    I never forget.

    Curses! Why didn’t I think of that?

  37. #520756
    On October 29th, 2008 at 3:21 pm, granite said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 2:54 pm, sonofdy said:

    She agrees and adds that you better not forget your anniversary.
    Exactly why I got married on my birthday.

    I never forget.

    ‘Course, we got married on my wife’s birthday.

    So, I’d get both barrels if I ever forgot.

    Been lucky wise so far…31+ years.

  38. #520769
    On October 29th, 2008 at 3:30 pm, sonofdy said:

    I never told my wife thats why we got married then, but I am sure she knows. She is not dumb. Besides It works for her too.

  39. #520774
    On October 29th, 2008 at 3:34 pm, sonofdy said:

    I am up to 12 years and going strong.

  40. #520781
    On October 29th, 2008 at 3:40 pm, granite said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 3:34 pm, sonofdy said:

    I am up to 12 years and going strong.

    Good for you.
    God bless you both.

  41. #520809
    On October 29th, 2008 at 3:51 pm, sonofdy said:
    On October 29th, 2008 at 3:34 pm, sonofdy said:

    I am up to 12 years and going strong.

    Good for you.
    God bless you both.

    Who ever said marriage was easy is a liar, but it is worth all of it. I know you feel the same.

  42. #520813
    On October 29th, 2008 at 3:54 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    I pray in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth for a few brave, patriotic Americans, who happen to work for the Commiemedia, to ask Barack Hussein Obama a few of the questions I posted to the Wolf Blitzer thread.

  43. #520820
    On October 29th, 2008 at 3:59 pm, wighttrasch said:

    sonofdy, are you the one that married in Rhodesia? Sorry for my memory…

  44. #520837
    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:07 pm, cheapseat said:

    frontierguy, at least we should urine test them for drug use. every job i know insists upon that, why not welfare and unemployment. btw married 35 years to the same woman and still happy.

  45. #520839
    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:07 pm, Wayfaring Stranger said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 10:50 am, Misscheryl said:

    Honestly, I could care less about one’s race or politics, but these people are viscious haters and I include everyone of them who post here. They seem to compete with each other as to who can be the biggest smart ass to others. I’ve seen them pat each other on the back for hurting someone and then cry that someone is being a racists if you don’t like their behavior. I, personally, have never been called a racists in my life until I came here. A soul isn’t black or white, young or old. A soul isn’t male or female. A soul is either kind or ugly, cultivates mercy and grace or cultivates hatefulness..it is the being, the essence of a person.

    I had to bold that last bit, because that is the heart of the matter.

    Thank you, Mischeryl!

  46. #520853
    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:11 pm, sonofdy said:

    sonofdy, are you the one that married in Rhodesia? Sorry for my memory…

    Nope Salt Lake City, Utah. I was born in New Zealand.

  47. #520862
    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:14 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Oh, that’s right–you’re the blue-eyed Pacific Islander!

    RAAAACIST!

  48. #520864
    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:15 pm, Wayfaring Stranger said:

    Mischeryl, this fairy tale is one of my old favorites, and your post brought it to mind. :)

  49. #520867
    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:16 pm, mattm said:

    That tape must have some really damaging evidence on it for the LAT to hod on to it.

  50. #520868
    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:16 pm, sonofdy said:

    Oh, that’s right–you’re the blue-eyed Pacific Islander!

    RAAAACIST!

    Thats me. I actualy did list myself as a Pacific Islander once to she what would happen. The government drone was stymied.

    ;-)

  51. #520893
    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:23 pm, granite said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:16 pm, mattm said:

    That tape must have some really damaging evidence on it for the LAT to hod on to it.

    YA THINK?!

    Good point!
    Totally agree.

  52. #520899
    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:24 pm, frontierguy said:

    MissCheryl, shrug it off. actually i am glad that the racist word is wearing off. i don’t care anymore and you should not either. the racist word on the left is their “safety word”. it is what they yell to stop the debate. it shows that they cannot win in the arena of ideas. when racist does not work, screaming to drown out your opponent is the next strategy. don’t let it upset you, it just shows how small they really are.

  53. #520907
    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:29 pm, fgmorley said:

    redstateskeptic said:
    Interesting that conservatives always choose to see the “tank” half full. If the LA Times were really in it to elect Obama, they wouldn’t have run the story in the first place.
    Example #999,988 of Michelle Malkin fabricating hysteria out of surmise.

    Hello:
    The tank isn’t half full on this election when it comes to the LAT; when it comes to the paid-for-by-obama media. It’s overflowing.

    Let’s see if you can actually grasp the fact that the LAT obamabots announced the tape back in the Spring, and now they cannot show the rest of us “inferiors” what it is all about. They made a promise? WTF is that worth to the LAT?

    Where is the hysteria, and where is the surmise, that you attribute to MM?

    The pattern is very clear to all but the brain dead. And that is the fact that ANY objections to the half-honky-all-donkey are deemed by the dhimmicrats as not worthy of discussion, as DISTRACTIONS.

    And to boot, the dhimmis WiILL trash your private life, if you so much as question the h-h-a-d’s response.

  54. #520913
    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:31 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Thank you Wayfaring Stranger! It can be comforting to come to realize that God knows us by our souls because that is who we really are. The rest just really doesn’t matter, but the rest can determine your essence if you want it to. That’s why every living soul is so incredibly special and incredibly important to help each one of us to become everything we can be. Even the trolls! :wink:

  55. #520924
    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:39 pm, wighttrasch said:

    ’stymied’–har! made me blow snot out of my nose.

  56. #520926
    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:40 pm, granite said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:31 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Thank you Wayfaring Stranger! It can be comforting to come to realize that God knows us by our souls because that is who we really are. The rest just really doesn’t matter, but the rest can determine your essence if you want it to. That’s why every living soul is so incredibly special and incredibly important to help each one of us to become everything we can be. Even the trolls!

    Correct.

    The rest just really doesn’t matter, but the rest can determine your essence if you want it to.

    Bingo!
    There’s the difference in worldviews.
    The socialists/statists deny the existence of the soul, ridicule the very idea of a soul; with the result that all they have left is “the rest”, and “the rest” thus, by default, determines their essence: money, sex, and power, as I’d written earlier.

  57. #520937
    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:46 pm, fulldroolcup said:

    like some of the other Hitler youth here

    sorry, watershed, but we’ve all seen plenty of would-be “Hitler youth” on the net recently, and they ALL are chanting the Messiah’s name.

    Please F*ck off, will you?

  58. #520938
    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:46 pm, fgmorley said:

    The term “Racist” is so overused, so undefined, so bogus these days, it means zip, nada, zero. And for me it is a badge of honor that I will sometimes wear whenever it is written or spoken by a communist or socialist, or anarchist.

    Not because I feel differently about “people of color”, or because I treat them as less-than. But just because I have been called today’s N-word and I know who called it; the ones who don’t have rational arguments for their attempts to take over my life, my property, my way of life.

    Not they just use hate speech to try and shut me up. To them I say FOAD. Also, when you come and try to shut me up…oh well I won’t give away the ending.

  59. #520958
    On October 29th, 2008 at 5:01 pm, sonofdy said:

    The term “Racist” is so overused, so undefined, so bogus these days, it means zip, nada, zero.

    Agreed, and its a real shame.

  60. #520966
    On October 29th, 2008 at 5:07 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    http://www.dailypaul.com/node/70801

    BREAKING!!–Lawsuits in 9 states – OH,HI,WA,CA,FL,GA.PA,NY & CT REQUIRE OBAMA TO SHOW BIRTH CERT OR BE REMOVED

    Posted October 28th, 2008 by Jdayh OR BE REMOVED FROM ALL BALLOTS!!
    DIGG THIS … NOW!!!!!!
    http://digg.com/2008_us_e...
    LAWSUITS ARE BEING FILED IN EIGHT(9) US STATES TO REQUIRE OBAMA TO PROVIDE CERTIFICATION OF BIRTH IN THE US OR
    BE REMOVED AS THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE ON US BALLOTS
    Lawsuits Starting Across the Nation Proceeding to Avert Potential Constitutional Crisis, Possible Civil Unrest, and Confidence in Elections;
    EDIT — NOW 9 STATES ARE SUING SEE UPDATED LINK FOR OHIO!!
    http://www.daytondailynew...
    Seattle WA. 10/22/2008 — Lawsuits in eight states as of this writing– Hawaii, Washington, California, Florida, Georgia. Pennsylvania, New York and Connecticut, are seeking judicial authority to force the certifying or decertify of Senator Barack Obama’s qualification to run as a candidate for President as a natural born U.S. Citizen. Previously, two lawsuits have failed to force the certifying documents from Obama.

  61. #520967
    On October 29th, 2008 at 5:08 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 11:51 am, watershed said:

    like some of the other Hitler youth here?

    Okay, one more time for those who never watched the History Channel and are too lazy to Google:

    The Nazi party was a left wing organization, not “right wing.”

    The name stands for “National Socialist German Workers’ Party.”

  62. #520971
    On October 29th, 2008 at 5:10 pm, old_texan said:

    I worked so hard to be a good racist and now look, everybodys one.

  63. #520985
    On October 29th, 2008 at 5:25 pm, wighttrasch said:

    old_texan, I’m trying to move up to ‘cracker’, but right now I’m just ‘white trash’.

  64. #521027
    On October 29th, 2008 at 5:43 pm, Wayfaring Stranger said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 4:31 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Thank you Wayfaring Stranger!

    You are most welcome!

    Like you, I’ve often been dismayed by the noxious bile and vituperation in some posts – sadly on occasion, from both sides.

    Civility and passionate discourse can coexist. Disagreement with someone’s ideas is not synonymous with hate speech, despite what certain elements of society say.

    And that, as Forest Gump would say, is all I have to say about that. ;)

  65. #521030
    On October 29th, 2008 at 5:44 pm, old_texan said:

    Well wighttrasch you have to do something really “crackery”. Have you out an old car in the yard? An old washing machine might do, but a car with the wheels off will get you to “cracker” status quick. I found an old Ford and it looks like hell.

  66. #521049
    On October 29th, 2008 at 5:54 pm, Wayfaring Stranger said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 5:01 pm, sonofdy said:

    The term “Racist” is so overused, so undefined, so bogus these days, it means zip, nada, zero.

    Agreed, and its a real shame.

    Yup. Could say more, but won’t. I think we’re [almost] all on the same page about the overuse, abuse and misuse of certain words and phrases.

    Makes one want to cry… :cry:

  67. #521541
    On October 30th, 2008 at 12:26 am, Wayfaring Stranger said:

    On October 29th, 2008 at 5:25 pm, wighttrasch said:

    old_texan, I’m trying to move up to ‘cracker’, but right now I’m just ‘white trash’.

    wighttrasch, Little Big Town’s hit Boondocks is one of my favorite country songs, for several reasons – for one, I love, love love their harmonies, and get a musician’s thrill from the fuguing at the end.

    But the lyrics, I think, speak for those of us who say, along with Little Big Town, I’m not ashamed; I’m proud of where I came from… :cool:

  68. #523011
    On October 31st, 2008 at 12:41 am, ITookTheRedPill said:
  69. #523014
    On October 31st, 2008 at 12:43 am, ITookTheRedPill said:
  70. #524930
    On November 1st, 2008 at 10:44 pm, Zaz said:

    Imagine the hypothetical future news story by a reformed news media. It is sure to be a wonderful dream and at the sametime a nightmare for respective sides of the political divide. It goes something like this…

    “At the height of affirmative action before the people came to their senses and finally declared it unconstitutional, the liberal media used affirmative action policies to help the less experienced (unqualified) candidate Barack Obama ascend to the presidency of the United States over the more experienced and qualified John McCain. Obama subsequently ran the United States into the ground. The people revolted justifiably and Obama’s “spread the wealth” polices were forever declared unconstitutional. In addition, the first amendment was modified to replace the “of the press” clause with the “the press must present triple checked facts only” clause. Ever since those constitutional changes, all Americans have learned to be more responsible, have become more patriotic, and all have achieved the American Dream. The United States has been the envy of the entire world ever since.”

    So which part of the hypothetical news story is your nightmare and which is your wonderful dream?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The indelible whiteness of MSNBC

November 23, 2009 05:07 AM by Michelle Malkin

88 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

Palin-bashers of pallor.

Emetic of the day

November 19, 2009 01:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

93 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“You guys make a pretty good photo op.”

How do you say “You lie!” in Mandarin?

November 18, 2009 09:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

Obama’s double-talk on dissent.

Cartoon of the day

November 16, 2009 10:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Rear-ended.

President O-bow-ma

November 14, 2009 09:34 PM by Michelle Malkin

184 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Downward dog.

The fall of the Berlin Wall

November 9, 2009 10:10 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

All the president’s hacks

November 5, 2009 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

23 Comments | 1 Trackback


Categories: Barack Obama, Media Bias



Mudville Gazette

» War costs money (2)
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook