Palin cleared by independent counsel

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 3, 2008 08:58 PM

News you won’t see flogged above the fold in tomorrow’s national newspaper front pages: Sarah Palin has been cleared of ethics violations by an independent counsel (as opposed to the legislative probe).

From the Anchorage Daily News:

A new report just released — hours before the polls open on Election Day — exonerates Gov. Sarah Palin in the Troopergate controversy.

The state Personnel Board-sanctioned investigation is the second into whether Palin violated state ethics law in firing her public safety commissioner, and it contradicts the earlier findings by a special counsel hired by the state Legislature.

Both investigations found that Palin was within her rights to fire Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan.

But the new report says the Legislature’s investigator was wrong to conclude that Palin abused her power by allowing aides and her husband, Todd, to pressure Monegan and others to dismiss her ex-brother-in-law, Trooper Mike Wooten. Palin was accused of firing Monegan after Wooten stayed on the job.

The Palins have argued that Wooten was a loose cannon who had tasered his stepson, drank beer in his patrol car, and threatened Palin’s father, and that their complaints that he shouldn’t be on the force were justified.

The Troopergate matter became sharply politicized after Palin was announced as Republican presidential candidate John McCain’s running mate in Tuesday’s election.

The report, released at a Monday afternoon press conference at the Hotel Captain Cook, presents the findings and recommendations of Anchorage lawyer Timothy Petumenos, hired as independent counsel for the Personnel Board to examine several complaints against Palin.

Petumenos wrote the Legislature’s special counsel, former state prosecutor Steve Branchflower, used the wrong state law as the basis for his conclusions and also misconstrued the evidence.

Posted in: Sarah Palin

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Jules Crittenden » Gate Shut
  2. MishMashZone » Palin Exonerated By Independent Council
  3. The Rude News » Blog Archive » Dirty Tricks 101
  4. Webloggin » Palin Exonerated in Troopergate Investigation
  5. independent counsel Clears Palin | Citizen-Right
  6. MacBigot Cached Glances
  7. Independent Council Clears Palin of Troopergate « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  8. Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection (130 Cases) « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  9. McCain-Palin Peaking at the Right Time! « Riggword Weblog
  10. Michelle Malkin » Pray
  11. Sarah VINDICATED! « Crazymountain’s Blog
  12. Game on! Palin cleared by independent counsel! Go vote for a war hero, not a Marxist “zero”! « Mark Epstein
  13. Me, Me, Me « Mark Epstein
  14. Troopergate, schmoopergate « Right Minded Online
  15. Palin cleared, for what it’s worth by now « WitSnapper | The Blog
  16. Media’s Latest Palin Scandal: Guilt By Daughter’s Boyfriend’s Mother Association « Conservative Thoughts and Profundity

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #527210
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:05 pm, Cameron said:

    And cries from the left about how there was a massive cover up or there was a plot in 3…2…

  2. #527213
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:08 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Actually, this is also on the home page of the NYT’s website right now.

    Shocked. Shocked I tell ya.

  3. #527214
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:10 pm, California Red said:

    Wish this would have been announced a few days ago. I think the Governors image is tarnished by trooper gate, but the media has by now hung several other tags on her. How much does this matter now?

    I have hopes that Governor Palin has a bright future regardless of what happens tomorrow.

  4. #527215
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:11 pm, karnold said:

    You beat me to it by seconds, Cameron; no matter how much mischief is inarguably committed by the Obama campaign, that will all get a pass from the MSM, who will then fan the flames of Kossacks everywhere over the merest shadow of a rumor. I’m sure I’m-Witless News tonight will stoke this fire in hopes of depressing conservative turnout.

    DON’T LET THE EEYORES DISSUADE YOU FROM VOTING TOMORROW! Vote as if your freedom depended on it.

    It probably does.

  5. #527217
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:12 pm, lottadawg said:

    Of course. I knew that.

  6. #527218
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:12 pm, normsrevenge said:

    TrumPedUp-Gate goes bust

    Suhprise Suhprise. .. not.

  7. #527224
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:15 pm, Cameron said:

    GMTA, karnold. That’s all. I have become more than annoyed with the venom spewed at Governor Palin just because she has the audacity to be a conservative woman running for the VP slot. The folks that are convinced her actions were illegal are the same that would have screamed at her for doing nothing about the abuse this trooper inflicted.

  8. #527225
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:17 pm, Boomer said:

    I’m surprised this bit of news wasn’t sat on until 5 November. Still it is good news! :)

  9. #527231
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:20 pm, rlwo2008 said:

    A little too late. However, she is still a wonderful woman and candidate.

  10. #527232
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:21 pm, Old Tanker said:

    I’m shocked….SHOCKED I tell ya, that this came out too late…..I question the timing ;-)

  11. #527233
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:21 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I’m sure the MSM is highly disappointed that this didn’t go the other way, as they’d all be screaming “OCTOBER SURPRISE!!!!” in November, of course.

  12. #527234
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:23 pm, Joy said:

    Sigh…

    MSM splashing this all over the Networks in 4,567,888, 4,567,887, 4,567,886………

    Oh never mind.

  13. #527237
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:25 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    OOps! I knew there had to be one MSM headline that had to negate this positive:

    Get this..ABCNews.com headline reads:(I know, I know, I’m always harping on them, with good reason)

    Second Probe Clears Palin: New Report Raises Concerns Over GOP Candidate’s Use of Yahoo! Email Accounts

  14. #527239
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:26 pm, shooter said:

    I guess it’s too late to question the timing.

  15. #527240
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:26 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Win or lose tomorrow, the best thing coming out of this whole extended exercise has been Sarah Palin. We are blessed and we have a future. Next Bobby Jindahl needs some exposure.

  16. #527241
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:26 pm, Joy said:

    Petumenos wrote the Legislature’s special counsel, former state prosecutor Steve Branchflower, used the wrong state law as the basis for his conclusions and also misconstrued the evidence.

    Nooooooo… that couldn’t happen…

    My sarcasm bucket runneth over.

  17. #527243
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:28 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    This whole trumped up “investigation” was politically motivated from the start.

    I’m glad this one backfired in their faces. About time.

  18. #527249
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:37 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    But she made her kids eat mac and cheese!
    The sky is falling!

  19. #527251
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:39 pm, vickisoup said:

    “About time” may be too little too late, BAL. :-(

  20. #527254
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:42 pm, jangar said:

    I’m glad this one backfired in their faces. About time.

    Almost all backfire in their faces, but they never leave it alone regarless of the issue. Some are still flipping out over Rathergate!

  21. #527255
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:44 pm, FamilyMan said:

    Really! I mean Really! What a surprise.

  22. #527257
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:47 pm, sandyb said:

    Sarah might he a girl, but she’s a “boyscout” at heart. I knew she’d never do anything underhanded.

  23. #527259
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:48 pm, Jaded said:

    I am shocked Sarah “the horrible” was actually just doing her JOB….such jerks BUT that’s OK they have steeled this woman to the rigors of campaigning and the media wing of the Democrat party and she is the future of conservatism!

  24. #527261
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:50 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    This is not the Sarah I thought I pretended to know

  25. #527264
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:53 pm, Jaded said:

    Good one RabbidSquirrel!

  26. #527265
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:53 pm, txvet2 said:

    It doesn’t matter. The local Kosacks will completely ignore this report, and six months from now will still be screaming TROOPERGATE! TROOPERGATE!

  27. #527268
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 9:57 pm, mattm said:

    This is actually on the NYTimes front page.

  28. #527274
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:04 pm, LC said:

    I don’t care if this gets a rise out of you or not because, well, what if this the last little push that tips the awesome force of America over the edge, taking McCain and Palin into the White House on the way.

    Whatever it is that you associate with the thought of the Conservative/Republican/McCain/Palin/PUMA/Clinton Democrat crowd all collectively straining as hard as they can against the impending socialist doom, I’ve got a name for it: The American Surge. McCain brought us the Iraq Surge, and we know just how that turned out! Now it’s time for us to bring ours!

  29. #527276
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:06 pm, Hangfire said:

    Will I be allowed to vote for Palin from my re-education camp?

  30. #527277
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:08 pm, gippergirl said:

    Bad employees SHOULD be fired, and the bosses who have the brass tacks to do it should NOT be investigated.

  31. #527281
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:10 pm, rightisright said:

    as sandyb said: I knew she’d never do anything underhanded.

    Let’s hear it, 3 hurrah’s for Gov. S. Palin.

    McCain/Palin ‘08
    Palin/Jindal ‘12 and beyond

  32. #527283
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:11 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Oh, well this is wonderful (not). I guess they’ll do anything to make sure Obama wins:

    Networks May Call Race Before Voting Is Complete

    From the NYT’s. Article link here:

    At least one broadcast network and one Web site said Monday that they could foresee signaling to viewers early Tuesday evening which candidate appeared to have won the presidency, despite the unreliability of some early exit polls in the last presidential election.

  33. #527285
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:12 pm, gippergirl said:

    To me this entire incident is similar to Joe The Plummer…there was a collective sigh of relief when there wasn’t any dirt on Joe…WHY was anyone bothering a private citizen???

    WHY SHOULD SARAH BE INVESTIGATED FOR FIRING A BAD EMPLOYEE??? Am curious, what other rotten things did this louse do to get himself fired?

  34. #527287
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:13 pm, bjc said:

    There are still some undecided’s out in the battleground states; Hopefully they will review this news and decide that character does count.

  35. #527288
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:14 pm, watershed said:

    I think the Governors image is tarnished by trooper gate

    No, the Governor’s image is tarnished by the fact that she doesn’t know what the Bush Doctrine is, doesn’t know that the First Amendment guarantees a free press, doesn’t know that the VP is NOT “in charge of the Senate”, doesn’t know who the Prime Minister of Canada is, doesn’t know that there ISN’T a Prime Minister of Quebec, doesn’t know any examples of John McCain pushing for government regulation, doesn’t read any newpapers or magazines, and overall simply doesnt know what she’s doing.

    But she’s folksy, and that means something to you here.

    But know this: SHE IS WHY YOU LOST.

  36. #527289
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:16 pm, gippergirl said:

    In fact, instead of Diversity Training, someone should put together Palin Firing Training and managers should be required to attend it so they can learn how to get rid of bad employees. This way they can prevent lousy employees from making their ways thru the ranks and ruining good businesses.

  37. #527290
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:16 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    This is unbelievable!!!! They’re already writing the headlines!

    From the same article above:

    When asked how Katie Couric, who is leading CBS’s coverage, might present the network’s projection to viewers, Mr. Friedman said he could imagine her saying, for example, “Given what we know about the results, or the projected results in various states, it’s beginning to look like it will be very difficult for John McCain to put together enough votes to win this election.”

    Oh well, let’s not just go ahead and ASSume who the winner will be Katie.

    I am SO MAD right now.

  38. #527291
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:17 pm, ajmontana said:

    you have her confused with your guy dipstick.

  39. #527292
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:17 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:13 pm, bjc said:

    There are still some undecided’s out in the battleground states; Hopefully they will review this news and decide that character does count.

    Yep, there sure are. I have family in VA and PA, and they are hearing more and more people leaning towards McCain.

    They simply don’t trust Obama.

  40. #527293
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:20 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Am curious, what other rotten things did this louse do to get himself fired?

    Well, let’s see. Aside from tasering his own son, he was caught drinking beer in his patrol car, and also made death threats to Palin’s father.

    Obviously this guy is not FIT to be a “law” enforcement officer, since he can’t follow the law himself. Probably one of those who was bullied as a kid, but now thinks he’s above the law because he’s a cop.

    But…

    Nothing to see here…move along.

  41. #527294
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:21 pm, watershed said:

    Whoops! That should read that there ISNT a Prime Minister of Quebec named Mr. Richard Z. Sirois. Everything else is right on the money.

  42. #527295
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:22 pm, nlebou said:

    Check out FOX. Greta is about to release something Hillary said that was not supposed to be heard. Will she ever learn to do a mic check before she speaks.

  43. #527296
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:23 pm, watershed said:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Z._Sirois

    This is Richard Z. Sirois, by the way.

  44. #527297
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:25 pm, ajmontana said:

    back in your hole troll….

  45. #527298
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:25 pm, zorro said:

    Palin cleared by independent counsel

    I never doubted for a minute that the Gov. would be cleared.

  46. #527301
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:29 pm, chapoutier said:

    Well, let’s see. Aside from tasering his own son, he was caught drinking beer in his patrol car, and also made death threats to Palin’s father.

    Obviously this guy is not FIT to be a “law” enforcement officer, since he can’t follow the law himself. Probably one of those who was bullied as a kid, but now thinks he’s above the law because he’s a cop.

    But of course, none of that matters because, as Sarah has said, the firing had nothing to do with any untoward pressure put on Monegan to fire Wooten. It was because he took a trip to DC.

    Right?

  47. #527304
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:34 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    But of course, none of that matters because, as Sarah has said, the firing had nothing to do with any untoward pressure put on Monegan to fire Wooten. It was because he took a trip to DC.

    Hey, just saying what the article published. Besides, he was breaking the law. In more ways than one.

  48. #527306
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:35 pm, nlebou said:

    never mind

  49. #527307
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:37 pm, sonofdy said:

    Well if Obama does win he must be destroyed as quickly as possiable. The democrats have alreay shown us the tactics needed. We need to never give him a chance at any point. If he wins tomorrow, every single thing that goes wrong from that point on will be his fault. Nothing that goes rightr will be his doing. We should expose every single lie and fraud. Starting with calling into question his very election based on the fraud we already know about. Everything should be done to get him impeached before he removes that ability forever.

  50. #527309
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:39 pm, garydt said:

    Whatershed,, can you enlighten me on what Ive been asking for over four years. What was John Kerrys plan for Iraq??. Four years later and Kerry never explained what he would do about Iraq. He only said what was wrong but had no solution. Your mainstream media gave him a pass over that but yet has screamed bloody murder when Palin didn’t know what the Bush Doctrine was. Further more I didn’t know how extensive Bush’s spending was until way after the 04 election.

  51. #527312
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:41 pm, California Red said:

    go away waterboy.

    I’d rather have Palin get some on the job training than have Biden that we know is good for 30 years of nothing in the Senate. Biden is consitently wrong on his foreign policy positions and can’t seem to keep his feet out of his mouth. He offers no hope of change, which is what your supposed to be all about.

  52. #527313
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:42 pm, watershed said:

    Just for fun, here’s what the senate.gov website says the job of the Vice President is-

    The vice president is usually seen as an integral part of a president’s administration and presides over the Senate only on ceremonial occasions or when a tie-breaking vote may be needed.

    And here’s what Sarah Palin says it is-

    They’re in charge of the U.S. Senate so if they want to they can really get in there with the senators and make a lot of good policy changes.

    Oops! She should’ve checked the job description first, I think.

  53. #527315
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:43 pm, bjc said:

    Gov. Palin has worked extremely hard for the McCain/Palin ticket over the last 60 days after coming out of nowhere, plowing through the endless MSM hatchet jobs over Troopergate et al and still staying on message; That’s one tough lady you can trust in the White House; Don’t let the MSM pond scum(watershed) keep you from rewarding her with your vote.

  54. #527319
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:49 pm, winemkr said:

    How about getting this up at Hot Air.

    This is not a request, it’s an order.

    Do it Malkin, this is your empire, get the job done.

  55. #527321
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:51 pm, mytake said:

    Watershed, Have you ever listened to Biden for more than a minute? I’ve noticed they’ve taken him out of public view. If Obama wins Biden will be a riot to watch for four years. There will be whole books of his misstatements and dilusional banter.

  56. #527329
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:58 pm, watershed said:

    #55

    Biden does have a Gerald Ford-ish quality about him, true! you’re right.

    But he knows what the Bush Doctrine is, and what his job is, and who is Prime Minister of Canada is, etc etc etc

  57. #527332
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:59 pm, teachem2 said:

    From the U.S. Constitution Article I

    The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.

    12th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

    The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;

    The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;

    Just because the senate.gov website states something, that doesn’t mean it’s fact. Sarah’s interpretation is entirely valid according to the Constitution, which is all that matters, not a website that can reflect the view of the party in power. Oh, and counting the electoral votes is NOT ceremonial.

  58. #527337
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:02 pm, wordweaver said:

    watershed – “Twit” comes to mind when I read your comments. Then I realize that it’s more “pity you” and your small-minded ilk. I wonder why you feel compelled to hang around with people you are so philosophically opposed to? Certainly, the like-minded, open-minded people who appreciate MM are not interested in your two cents.

    By the way, IF Obama wins, your two cents becomes 1/5 of a cent, and when it gets spread around… well, you’ll be worth nothing. Nada. Zilch.

    Congratulations. /sarcasm

  59. #527347
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:05 pm, BrianNY said:

    #52 watershed said:

    Oops! She (Governor Palin) should’ve checked the job description first, I think.

    Article 1, Section 3 of the US Constitution:

    The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.

    I see no language in Section 3 that contradicts what you quoted from Governor Palin.

  60. #527352
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:08 pm, Hadenough said:

    Call me a fart in church but, I am underwhelmed by this news in the bottom of the 9th. I would rather see
    ‘WHY ISN”T THE SUPREME COURT HEARING BERG vs OBAMA TODAY ?’

  61. #527353
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:08 pm, FamilyMan said:

    TROLLS ARE NOT OUR ADVERSARIES, THEY ARE OUR ENEMIES.

  62. #527368
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:14 pm, travlinman said:

    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:42 pm, watershed said:
    Just for fun, here’s what the senate.gov website says the job of the Vice President is-

    The vice president is usually seen as an integral part of a president’s administration and presides over the Senate only on ceremonial occasions or when a tie-breaking vote may be needed.

    And here’s what Sarah Palin says it is-

    They’re in charge of the U.S. Senate so if they want to they can really get in there with the senators and make a lot of good policy changes.

    Oops! She should’ve checked the job description first, I think.

    Hey Watershed, the genius, care to guess where the quote below comes from? I don’t see the word ‘ceremonial’ in there. Unless it is hidden in the same ‘clause’ that states that abortion is a right to privacy issue. Let me know where you find them, cause they ain’t in my copy.

    Article 1, Section 3, “The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.”

    Oops, maybe you should have read the U.S. Constitution first! ‘The VP of the United States shall be President of the Senate’ is pretty definitive language. What part do you not understand?

    What is the next golden nugget of information you are going to share with us? It would not have anything to do with “the earth is really flat and the sun rotates around us!” would it?

  63. #527369
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:14 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    But he knows what the Bush Doctrine is, and what his job is, and who is Prime Minister of Canada is, etc etc etc

    Really? There are several phases of the Bush Doctrine. And I bet you can’t even name the person who coined the term in the first place.

    But then again, who really cares? You’re judging someone because they don’t know who the dude in Quebec is? Get real.

    Do you know off hand who the president of Lesotho is?

    Nah…didn’t think so. Go home.

  64. #527372
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:16 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    But then again, he probably couldn’t point to where Lesotho is on a map either.

  65. #527374
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:18 pm, travlinman said:

    Sorry, BrianNY #59, I did not read down as far as your post after I saw waterhead’s idiotic attempt at mental superiority. You shot him down quite nicely.

  66. #527382
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:22 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    You shot him down quite nicely.

    I can shoot him down in 10 seconds live. He needs his Wikipedia to help him out with his “facts”.

  67. #527389
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:26 pm, mytake said:

    If Watershed is still around I would like to point out that everything is relative. There will be a point at which Watershed will say, “Hey wait , that’s not fair!”. Remember Obama thinks we Americans are ALL unfair and must give our wealth to the world. How poor are you prepared to go Watershed?

  68. #527390
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:28 pm, watershed said:

    The Vice President is NOT “in charge” of the senate, no matter what you want to say about it, people. Its cool, though!

  69. #527395
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:33 pm, watershed said:

    BlameAmericaLast, here’s a tip. If trying to get me on facts, in an attempt to prove I am just like ol’ Sarah, remember, in your strange partisan brain, that I am NOT running for Vice President. That makes a HELL of a lot of difference, in my mind.

    Bottom line: you dont want a VP who “knows things”. Excellent standards!

  70. #527397
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:34 pm, mytake said:

    She knows how to get natural gas to our country. Not so much Biden and Obama.

  71. #527402
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:38 pm, teachem2 said:

    The Vice President is NOT “in charge” of the senate, no matter what you want to say about it, people. Its cool, though!

    I detect the stomping of feet.

  72. #527405
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:40 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Bottom line: you dont want a VP who “knows things”. Excellent standards!

    Sorry to say, but I bet Obama doesn’t know everything either. And he’s running at the top of the ticket with NO experience whatsoever. What has he run? Nothing. And what “community” organizing he did has resulted in bigger slums.

    If you want a know-nothing mouthpiece, have at it, because that’s all Mr. Empty Suit is. A mouthpiece. All show, no substance. No sooner does he enter the Senate (and collects a paycheck and does nothing to show for it), he’s immediately running for president.

    At least Palin is running a state, not like Obama who tried (and failed) to organize a 5-block chunk of a city.

    Go ahead, vote for the puppet-meister-in-chief.

  73. #527406
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:41 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I detect the stomping of feet.

    Oh, you mean like a 5-year old? You’re right.

    By the way, a VP can have as much influence over policy as he or she wishes. It’s all what you make of it. No one says you’re not “allowed” to do so.

  74. #527410
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:43 pm, California Red said:
  75. #527412
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:48 pm, twofoot said:

    I think what we are seeing is a sterling example of the typical leftist. When shown chapter and verse where they are wrong, all they can do is proclaim, “The constitution is wrong!”

  76. #527415
    On November 3rd, 2008 at 11:54 pm, wordweaver said:

    Folks, let’s stop encouraging watershed and maybe s/he will go away (and find another site that can/will benefit from his/her infinite wisdom). The rest of us should go to bed so we can get up tomorrow and go to our jobs. Somebody needs to earn money to pay for Obama’s “plans”…

    Still holding out hope that level-headed people will recognize the danger in Obama/Biden. If not, well, we’re a strong people and will overcome the damage *eventually*. I just hope that we’ll still have the freedom to voice our discontent.

    Don’t forget – Vote. Vote. Vote. (Oh, wait, that’s what the Dems do!) ;-)

  77. #527427
    On November 4th, 2008 at 12:03 am, Joy said:

    California Red – No, no no… his preference is for girl-boys, because they are softer… girl-girls are tougher… so… wait… maybe you’re right… no… girl-boys are… wait….

  78. #527430
    On November 4th, 2008 at 12:05 am, Joy said:

    Can you imagine if Palin had said something like the girl-girl, girl-boy comment?

    Holy cow…

  79. #527441
    On November 4th, 2008 at 12:18 am, BlameAmericaLast said:

    On November 4th, 2008 at 12:05 am, Joy said:

    Can you imagine if Palin had said something like the girl-girl, girl-boy comment?

    Holy cow…

    Yeah, she would’ve been called a racist, a homophobe and God knows what else.

  80. #527443
    On November 4th, 2008 at 12:19 am, winemkr said:

    Sorry Malkin, I see that it is already there and I was a little to antsy.

    Semper Fi

  81. #527446
    On November 4th, 2008 at 12:23 am, Joy said:

    BAL – Yeah, and STUPID… VAPID… DUMB etc.

    This clip would be playing non-stop on all the alphabet stations with all the commentators making snarky comments and expressing fear galore that she was one heart-beat away!

    GAH… You can’t fix this kind of idiocy.

  82. #527470
    On November 4th, 2008 at 12:58 am, Floyd R. Turbo said:

    Wordweaver, amen to “level headed people” and lots of prayer. May God’s Mercy prevail in EVERY precinct across this wonderful land. May there be a “WWF Smackdown” of the left…an unmistakable repudiation of their big government/lotsa taxes philosophy. God help us-US…

    But if He has determined that we deserve a 4 year trip to the woodshed for our mistakes, well, we’ll survive. It’s what we do…and He’ll put us (US) back on top…

  83. #527471
    On November 4th, 2008 at 12:58 am, RabbidSquirrel said:

    On November 3rd, 2008 at 10:14 pm, watershed said:

    But know this: SHE IS WHY YOU LOST.

    Quite the contrary – shes the only thing that kept McCain in the race for this long.

    Had he or any other candidate run on a platform of stopping illegal immigration, none of us would even know who Obama is at this very moment. (not that we know who he is anyway but that is another thread)

    If a candidate came out TONIGHT and was able to get on the ballot, with only an illegal immigration platform, that candidate would win also.

  84. #527483
    On November 4th, 2008 at 1:07 am, RyanInSanJose said:

    It would be nice for a complete run down from our resident Obama supporters showing why Biden is magnificent. I mean, since Palin is so awful, what is it exactly about Biden that makes him great? He’s “super-gaffetastic” to quote our host.

  85. #527502
    On November 4th, 2008 at 1:27 am, RogerCfromSD said:

    You know, as much as I dislike Obama for the conniving person he is and for the anti-American, Marxist things he wants to do… I believe I dislike watershed even more.

  86. #527529
    On November 4th, 2008 at 2:27 am, RetFireman said:

    What I think is funny is that Waternoose keeps going on and on about something and nobody is even responding to him. I think he types just to make himself feel imporrtant. Especially since they probably booted him off the Libby Blogs for being an annoying pest.

    He is like the toddler who keeps tugging at his mommy’s hem repeating, “Mom…mom…mom…mommy…mommy…mommy…momma…momma…momma…” until finally she screams “Shut the hell up already!”

    What a chode. Talking about pointless crapola that ultimately doesn’t matter one stinking bit.

  87. #527532
    On November 4th, 2008 at 2:33 am, RetFireman said:

    In fact, Waterchode has been here all day. What happened? Did you get suspended for writing dirty Palin jokes on you school desk again?

  88. #527534
    On November 4th, 2008 at 2:35 am, RetFireman said:

    Or maybe he couldn’t get on the porn sites today due to credit card maxing out. Damn this economy. eh Waterchode?

  89. #527559
    On November 4th, 2008 at 3:52 am, Papa Louie said:

    former state prosecutor Steve Branchflower, used the wrong state law as the basis for his conclusions and also misconstrued the evidence.

    I had several problems with the Branchflower report from day one:

    1) Somehow the Legislature’s investigators were able to devine the motives of Sarah Palin when she removed Monegan as Commissioner of Public Safety. Either they were able to read her mind, or they made an assumption about her motives based on what they, themselves, would have done in her situation.

    2) If firing Officer Wooten was so important to Gov. Palin and her motive for removing Monegan, wouldn’t she have made darn sure that the new Commissioner would fire Wooten before she appointed him? If so, why does he still have his job?

    3) If she had remained silent about her ex-brother-in-law’s behavior (his death threats, hunting violations, tasing of a child, etc.), wouldn’t her politically motivated enemies be claiming just the opposite of what they are saying now? Wouldn’t they be accusing Gov. Palin of covering up Officer’s Wooten’s misdeeds and allowing a rogue cop to remain on the job because of favortism and because she wanted to avoid embarassment to her family and her political career?

    The bottom line is, they would have found fault with her no matter how she had responded in this situation. That is how the Left operates.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Riehl World View

» Holder Cares About CAIR

HotAir GreenRoom