Fairness Doctrine Watch: Schumer likens conservative opinion to pornography (vid added)
Of human bondage.
Lots of readers have been alerting me to Chuck Schumer’s comments on Fox News this morning, reportedly comparing conservative opinion to pornography that needs to be regulated. Fairness Doctrine here we come.
Hot Air should have the video up soon.
Perhaps I should get ready to label every one of my blog posts “NSFW.”
***
Here’s the vid, thanks to Allah:
And more from The Hill:
Asked if he is a supporter of telling radio stations what content they should have, Schumer used the fair and balanced line, claiming that critics of the Fairness Doctrine are being inconsistent.
“The very same people who don’t want the Fairness Doctrine want the FCC [Federal Communications Commission] to limit pornography on the air. I am for that… But you can’t say government hands off in one area to a commercial enterprise but you are allowed to intervene in another. That’s not consistent.”
In 2007, Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), a close ally of Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) told The Hill, “It’s time to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine. I have this old-fashioned attitude that when Americans hear both sides of the story, they’re in a better position to make a decision.”
Senate Rules Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) last year said, “I believe very strongly that the airwaves are public and people use these airwaves for profit. But there is a responsibility to see that both sides and not just one side of the big public questions of debate of the day are aired and are aired with some modicum of fairness.”
Conservatives fear that forcing stations to make equal time for liberal talk radio would cut into profits so significantly that radio executives would opt to scale back on conservative radio programming to avoid escalating costs and interference from the FCC.
They also note that conservative radio shows has been far more successful than liberal ones.
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
- First they will come for Talk Radio… who will be next? - A Grym View
- Vocal Minority
- PAXALLES
- Slowly Floating the Notion (Fairness Doctrine > Hate Speech > Political Correctness > Then the Blogs) « Zipline Conservative
- Single file! No conservative talk in the bread line! « Above My Pay Grade!
- The Jawa Report
- Bloodthirsty Liberal » Obscenity
- OpenMarket.org » Archive » Castro Endorses Obama
- Anyone Threatened By a Billy-Club? | Pirates! Man Your Women!
- Random Election Day Thoughts « Padna’s Ponderings
- Steynian 279 « Free Canuckistan!
- The Irascible Chef » Election Day 2008
- Once More Unto the Breach Dear Friends « Black Coffee & Bourbon
- Both sides of p0rn, thru the Fairness Doctrine « WitSnapper | The Blog
- Michelle Malkin » Fairness Doctrine Watch: Schumer likens conservative opinion to pornography vid added « Right Minded Online
- Classical Values
- President Obama - Page 3 - Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums
- The Unfairness Doctrine is returning-Obama to stifle Opposition « The Obama WatchDog Press
- The push is already on to muzzle conservative talk radio and silence dissent « Sharp Right Turn
- The 1st to GO… « Pumas Unleashed
- Is the ‘Fairness Doctrine’ Rearing its Ugly Head…Again? | shyspeak.net
- Of ‘Fairness’ and the slippery slope « Armed and Free
- Meet Talk's Executioner
- Great American Political Blog Chatter « Conservative Diaspora
- Reviving The Fairness Doctrine… « In One Ear… Out the Other
- OBAMA’S CENSORSHIP « AMERICA TIMES
- Expose The Media » Hush Rush: Democrats Want To Mandate Fairness In Broadcasting
- Expose The Media » Hush Rush: Democrats Want To Mandate Fairness In Broadcasting
- OBAMA’S CENSORSHIP & CONTROL…ulterior desire of all leftists « FactReal
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Fairness Doctrine
Right Pundits
» Joe Lieberman: Fort Hood Shooter Is ‘Home-Grown Terrorist’Legal Insurrection
» Bruni de la Motte for Health Care CzarRiehl World View
» Obama: No Military Death Shall Go UnexploitedLegal Insurrection
» In The End: No Public Option, No Abortions, No Pelosi, No ReidThe Other McCain
» Paralysis by analysisThe Powers That Be
» Obama: ‘Don’t Jump to Conclusions’ About Ft. Hood; Immediately Jumps to ConclusionsLegal Insurrection
» NY Times Names Names
He knows that’s not accurate. He would allow pornography.
But political speech must be curtailed.
Why is he still in Congress? That moron should have been voted out long ago.
‘Chuck you’ Shumer? Really? Raped the financial markets lately, Senator? Or sandwiched any waitresses with Teddy? Why does this sleaze still have his job?
I’ve already voted, and I’m praying hard for McCain/Palin.
God bless America (please)!!!!
It’s a deal breaker if the Libs try to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine.
A deal breaker as in Lock and Load.
He can set the rules. We will play he game. I hope Chucky is ready.
I am.
Bye bye 1st amendment, looking at you 2nd amendment.
what a bunch of pompus boobs we have elected.
willie peter,
Always wanted to tell you I really like your pseudonym.
WP, don’t leave home without it.
To dumb to argue, Schumer tries to be clever.
As my brother-in-law wrote to his Member of Congress, if they try to bring back the UNFairness Doctrine, the Million-Man March will look like a walk in the park in comparison to the protests that will descend on Washington.
If the leftist governmet attempts to strip us of our right to free speech and political dissent then all the rules of decorum go out the window and it’s every man/woman for themselves.
Folks, this is the true agenda of the Democrat Left. It’s an affront to free-speech and it’s very real, coming from a powerful senator. If you haven’t voted already, vote President McCain and retain your right to free-speech through divided government.
So pornography will be regulated in the next congress?
Does it mean that people will be forced to spend equal amount of time between watching / reading porno and praying Jesus!
Porn is in the same category as the other sewage that he spews. Headlines I would like to see:
“AP/UPI Breaking News: Senator Charles Schumer met his demise today when he stumbled and fell into a commercial wood chipper. Unfortunately, the industrial-grade wood chipper destroyed all recognizable features of the senator and it will be impossible to separate his remains from tree limbs. His family wishes that you honor his memory by purchasing a fire log this winter at WallMart, Target, or your local super market”.
Of course the don’t want free speech.They want us to be like Venezuela.
On November 4th, 2008 at 11:07 am, sonofdy said: Bye bye 1st amendment, looking at you 2nd amendment.
**************************************
Remember that one reason the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution exists is to make sure that we have the rights guaranteed under the First Amendment (and others) to the United States Constitution.
I will not submit. I will not give in. Never, never, never.
I saw this interview on Fox earlier…talking about smirky. If these guys grab the power…look out.
BTW, Schumer also said that to get more union particiaption, we need to do away with the secret ballot…WTH?
I did not expect to see any version of the ‘fairness’ doctrine make a return, until I saw the gleefull joy in Schumer’s eye at the thought of controlling other peoples free speach.
Though he tried to claim differently today, it is also clear he will be trying to control the internet as well. Before you start to laugh, think China.
The Millions of Conceal and Carry Man March.
This is exactly why the military is sworn to the constitution and NOT the president.
Obama does not understand this. My unit has 120 people in it. Exactly one is voting Obama. There could be more because its not like I took a poll. But only one came out with it.
If they are so utterly convinced that they have the moral and intellectual high ground why is the left so terrified of having an actual argument?
And by “argument” I don’t mean a DU style shrieking of epithets at the top of your lungs… I mean the process of articulating and then defending your beliefs.
Vichy ‘Patriot’ Schumer
Welcome to The New World Order according to Obama and the Libs
You know what’s sad? These people can’t “grab” power, it has to be given to them. The depressing fact of the matter is that almost half… possibly more than half… of the people in this country want them in power.
First the Fairness doctrine, then the Special Civil Force (SCF), then the supression of all illegal news, constitutional change, followed by the closure and criminialization of organizations and groups counter to the government, outlawing of the unions and last but not least, arrest of those cutting into the food lines.
Schumer’s face is worse than the most vile pornography. Since’s he’s up for reelection in 2010, he should be the GOP’s No. 1 target.
Granted, it’s NY, but maybe Rudy can run for that seat.
I saw that idiot on Fox this morning. good grief, talk about lame azs reasoning.
That doesn’t make sense. Pornography is awesome and has many uses. Conservative opinion? Not so much.
Schumer is a big D*** wad.
On November 4th, 2008 at 11:25 am, James Felix said:
Yes, it is curious that our resident trolls haven’t jumped in here to crow about this.
I suppose they are waiting for orders on what to say from the Dear Leader.
As for his reasoning on removing the secret ballot provisions in regards to union voting, which were that there are ‘just not enough union members in the private sector’, it would seem to not be a big jump for him to apply that same logic to people that just dont vote along his party’s political lines.
I do think that once he has established ‘open’ voting for unions, it will be a ‘natural’ progression for Schumer to push for ‘open’ elections for all political issues as well.
It was also clear Schumer has no issue supporting the unions that dominate ALL government jobs. Out here in Californai, it is in fact these unions that are a major part of destroying the state government.
In the end, he came across as a political power monger willing to do whatever he can to be in power. I do not think he cares about anything but his own ambitions.
In about one-half hour, I will be turning on the Rushbo show. If they try to take away my Rush Limbaugh “fix”, they will have to pry my radio…etc. Please, God, don’t let this happen to my country.
On November 4th, 2008 at 11:34 am, Digshot said:
Whups, I posted too soon. Chalk digshot up as opposed to free speech.
If memory serves, Hitler was elected, Chavez was elected, so on and so forth.
History has a way of repeating itself.
Whoever said this, I’m down. Come and get it.
How do you figure?
I just said it’s worthless, not that it shouldn’t exist. Don’t be so melodramatic.
Surely you are not surprised FilmLadd.
Perhaps Schumer wants to bring the Sedition Act of 1798 back into force. It could be used a the Boilerplate. It work so well for John Adams’s one term.
I’m with you on this one. I love Rush.
How can you people not realize that worshiping figures like Rush Limbaugh is what is costing you this election?
This keeps getting funnier.
OK, maybe this is a dumb question, but can they really do this????? Woudl it even work?
Keep thinking that. Always happy to see a lib thinking that way.
I’m just trying to help you out. The sooner you realize, the better.
How is the water everybody? Getting warmer, isn’t it?
With Obama in the white hous, a liberal super majority in both houses and a liberal supreme court? Yes they can.
It would apply only to conservative speach, and could cause a civil war but they would do thier damnedest to make it work.
They’ll try this exactly once.
Clinging to your guns? You sound bitter.
TROLLS ARE TRULY DEMENTED.
Never mind the fact that Obama said he opposed the fairness doctrine.
Of course.
They already did it once, they let it be revoked. They will not make that mistake again.
Viva la Oklahoma Revolution
As I understand it died in the OK senate, but I hope they try again.
We should spread this to all the states and keep trying until it passes.
People – I don’t know the complete answer to surviving an Obama/Reid/Pelosi administration but I have a suggestion, a return to Federalism.
The Founders intended that the states remain sovereign entities with the role of the Federal government limited to international affairs and defense. The Fed long ago usurped the Constitutional primacy of the states and its time to take it back.
We Conservatives need to work at the state level to elect officials that will fight to restore the 10th Amendment rights of the states to their proper place otherwise the Marxists will continue to run roughshod over our liberty.
AZ is voting today on Prop 101 that if successful will be a shot across the bow of the Fed by exempting AZ from any national health care plan.
Earlier this year OK fired its own shot by passing almost unanimously a bill that basically told the Fed to go to Hell regarding the Fed’s attempt to overturn an illegal immigration law passed by OK.
I personally plan to write every single GOP state representative in every single Red state to urge them to form a 10th Amendment Coalition. I do not want my life dictated by Leftists in CA, NY, NJ, and their radical associates.
I urge everyone to work hard to solidify the Conservative base in all Red states.
Obama LIED.
Digshot,
You need to read Sun Tzu.
On November 4th, 2008 at 11:53 am, Digshot said:
Obambi doesn’t have the spine to stand up to Bill O’Reilly. Given half a chance, Congress would run rough-shod over him.
Do you trolls know what happens to our enemies?
One guess only.
Nice!! We’re on the same page.
Schumer pushing OBiden for dumbest senator…he will capture the moniker if Odumbo is the winner.
On November 4th, 2008 at 11:39 am, nlebou said:
No. Just slightly nauseated.
When I was a teenager I was very liberal, mostly because I was (and still am) militantly pro-free-speech and I thought that the conservatives were anti-free-speech (I was young, I watched too much television, what can I say).
Now liberals hate free speech. They have gone all the way from being misguided-but-good-hearted to 100% thugs, not understanding that you must defend not only the free speech of what you agree with, but what you disagree with.
Wouldn’t the Fairness Doctrine apply to broadcast television as well as radio?
Hey Digshot – just which Conservative ideas do you oppose? Small government? Low taxes? Strong defense? Support of free speech? Please, I want to know.
Michelle,
Schumer thinks you’re a porn star?
Be afraid. Be VERY afraid!!!!!
Liberals want to destroy those they disagree with, while conservatives wish to persuade. That is the difference. I wonder if liberals can’t stand to have their assumptions questioned. That is, they can’t stand to think they might be wrong. That’s the same mentality of husbands who beat their wives. If they don’t like Michelle’s views, then let’s call her a race-traitor, sell-out, Asian whore. Destroy her, rather than destroy her arguments. The “Fairness Doctrine”. There’s Orwellspeak for ya.
And the internet BUT, only the conservative side.
Hate Tyrant is still my favorite.
On November 4th, 2008 at 11:54 am, Flyoverman said:
Don’t give him tips! Let him keep watching Boston Legal, Daily Show, and smoking doobies.
I doubt it would make a difference… after all, if I listen to Limbaugh, I ‘worship’ him. And porn is more useful than political commentary that opposes liberalism.
Some people just can’t be engaged.
Sweet!!!
Communism cannot survive if speech is free. Simple.
Obama talked to O’Reilly, what more do you want?
Also, why would a Democratic Congress have beef with a Democratic President? You think that’s what it’s going to be like? They’re going to spend their time in the majority trying to make each other look bad?
Obama lied and troops died…..
Sorry-He only voted against funding the troops!
GSP
Chuck Schumer sucks. Doesn’t he know that the Bill of Rights protects speech, particularly political speech?
Of course the Supreme Court with all of its legislating judges might just agree with him. That would be very dark.
This country seems to be going to hell in a handbasket.
Sounds to me like Schumer has some conservative woman fantasy going on.
EWWWWWWWW!
Maybe we need to send Ann Coulter over to give him a good spanking…
If shummer thinks conservative speech is the equalivalent of pornography, I just hate to see what he will think of my current research paper on Female Sex Addicts and Online Pornography.
GSP
OT-Please keep the comments clean, the research paper is legitimate.
When the Constitution is thrown out with the trash, look out. They will have a tiger by the tail. I predict that the states will become more significant in this fight when it is realized that they will be needed to stand against this new Marxist government. Too many Americans have died defending this country to let it fall into the hands of these curs.
If any of you moronic trolls remember the free speech movement of the early sixties, All they wanted was to disrupt and use foul language.
You haven’t changed much in 45 years have you.
You undereducated, mentally deficient trolls would love the fairness doctrine so you wouldn’t be confronted with superior points of view.
Snipe away trolls, You all sound like fools.
They only grab the power if the American people give it to them. I hope we are smart enough not to do that.
The closest thing Michelle comes to hate is a little snark. OK, she’s not a saint. But not a hater, by a long shot. Hate means, you really want to destroy the person. It’s so funny the left talks about hate on the right. I just don’t see it. I have to go over to HuffPo for that. They could write a textbook on how to destroy those you disagree with.
None of those ideas are bad, nor are they ‘conservative ideas,’ if the current incarnation of the conservative movement is any indication. The Republican party has been anything but ’small government’ over the past few decades. The taxes thing is a red herring. Embroiling ourselves in needless, expensive wars makes us weaker, not stronger. And free speech? Really? Who’s oppressing your speech?
To everyone answering the trolls on this site, I just have this to say:
Proverbs 26:4 Do not answer a fool according to his folly,
or you will be like him yourself.
This is genuinely scary and nothing to joke at. The Dems might not be able to ban conservative speech, but they can damn sure tacitly encourage biases against it to intimidate with under the veil of “countering intolerant speech.” Ask Republican college students among some.
Watch your back, MM.
James Greenidge
Jamaica, Queens, NY
What’s the matter Chucky? Peeved that your ilk doesn’t control EVERY FACET of EVERY communications medium?
The Soviets tried that. Pravda certainly didn’t mean “truth.”
Looks like Chucky Schumer wants to, Bigshot.
FilmLadd Do you want to answer this moron or shall I?
Chuckie is a disgrace to our freedoms here in America. This is only the beginning. If “That One” wins conservatism will be squashed in the media. I just do not understand why my fellow journalists believe the Fairness Doctrine will not affect the way our business will be allowed to exist? I’m so disappointed in the very same media I work in!
On November 4th, 2008 at 12:03 pm, Digshot said:
I don’t want anything. Obama is wanting for a spine. O’Reilly pushed him around like a playground bully. He wants to get along with everyobdy.
They are going to spend their time pushing their agendas. They are an ambitious lot, and weak players get pushed aside. “Politics ain’t beanbag”
Rimshot,
Are you a graduate of the James Carville school of charm?
If you are a member of the House and up for relection every two years your perspective can be VERY different from the President and your Senators.
THAT is the KEY for the next two years. I intend to put the fear of god in my Democratic rep. It can be done. Just push the right buttons.
So who decides which ideas qualify as conservative and which ideas qualify as liberal? This is just dripping with potential abuse.
On November 4th, 2008 at 11:04 am, b-cat said:
He knows that’s not accurate. He would allow pornography.
But political speech must be curtailed.
______________________________________
Amen to that.
I still can’t figure out how pornography ever got included with free political speech to begin with…
Remember when C-Span went to divvying up callers based on repub/dem/other. Totally changed the tenor of the callins. Even though I love Brian Lamb, I had to suspect him a bit after that! After that, the callins were no longer a truly representative sample of the callers. Why change that?
My state only has Democrats for Senate and House. God is not something they fear.