<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enough with the &#8220;re-branding&#8221; crap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/05/enough-with-the-re-branding-crap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/05/enough-with-the-re-branding-crap/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:38:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lets Talk About “Rebranding” : Liberty&#8217;s Lamp</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/05/enough-with-the-re-branding-crap/comment-page-3/#comment-685231</link>
		<dc:creator>Lets Talk About “Rebranding” : Liberty&#8217;s Lamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=18366#comment-685231</guid>
		<description>[...] Malkin hates the term, and is about ready to freak out about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malkin hates the term, and is about ready to freak out about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Obama backs off tax increases; Schwarzenegger mulls tripling car taxes, raising pet taxes, and more</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/05/enough-with-the-re-branding-crap/comment-page-3/#comment-555100</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Obama backs off tax increases; Schwarzenegger mulls tripling car taxes, raising pet taxes, and more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=18366#comment-555100</guid>
		<description>[...] GOP Gov. Arnold &#8220;Rebrand the GOP&#8221; Schwarzenegger is mulling possible hikes in California&#8217;s vehicle license fees &#8211; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GOP Gov. Arnold &#8220;Rebrand the GOP&#8221; Schwarzenegger is mulling possible hikes in California&#8217;s vehicle license fees &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brain-Jockey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hiding the Republican Principles</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/05/enough-with-the-re-branding-crap/comment-page-3/#comment-542999</link>
		<dc:creator>Brain-Jockey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hiding the Republican Principles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=18366#comment-542999</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin&#8217;s dislike of &#8220;rebranding&#8221; is justified, but a discussion about the damage the outgoing administration, Congress and others have done to the &#8220;brand&#8221; is valid. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin&#8217;s dislike of &#8220;rebranding&#8221; is justified, but a discussion about the damage the outgoing administration, Congress and others have done to the &#8220;brand&#8221; is valid. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s The Narrative, Stupid &#8211; The Politics of Scrabble</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/05/enough-with-the-re-branding-crap/comment-page-3/#comment-537581</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s The Narrative, Stupid &#8211; The Politics of Scrabble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 22:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=18366#comment-537581</guid>
		<description>[...] ostracize the faux conservative elements, what policy proposals conservatives need to present, and outright denial about any need for reform. All of these discussion miss, in my humble opinion, the primary cause [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ostracize the faux conservative elements, what policy proposals conservatives need to present, and outright denial about any need for reform. All of these discussion miss, in my humble opinion, the primary cause [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BD57</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/05/enough-with-the-re-branding-crap/comment-page-3/#comment-537578</link>
		<dc:creator>BD57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 22:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=18366#comment-537578</guid>
		<description>IMO, W. made a pact with the devil to get the support he thought he needed to prosecute the &quot;War on Terror&quot; - and eventually, the pact destroyed his party.

I doubt W. believed the Dems would support the WOT in the long run -  they&#039;re just not capable of it.

So he decided he&#039;d have to keep the Republican caucuses in both houses of Congress happy.  And (I suspect) he bought into the idea that a Republican President vetoing legislation passed by a Republican Congress (even if the majority backing a particular bill was Dems &amp; RINO&#039;s) would &quot;look bad.&quot;

Congressional Republicans &lt;strong&gt;have no coherent philosophy;&lt;/strong&gt; by putting them in charge (because opposing them was out of the question), W. ripped out the wheel and left his Administration domestically rudderless.

&lt;strong&gt;THAT&lt;/strong&gt; was a lack of leadership.

On top of that, I doubt there&#039;s ever been a more inept, disinterested Administration where communication was concerned.  &quot;Incoherent&quot; is too kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO, W. made a pact with the devil to get the support he thought he needed to prosecute the &#8220;War on Terror&#8221; &#8211; and eventually, the pact destroyed his party.</p>
<p>I doubt W. believed the Dems would support the WOT in the long run &#8211;  they&#8217;re just not capable of it.</p>
<p>So he decided he&#8217;d have to keep the Republican caucuses in both houses of Congress happy.  And (I suspect) he bought into the idea that a Republican President vetoing legislation passed by a Republican Congress (even if the majority backing a particular bill was Dems &amp; RINO&#8217;s) would &#8220;look bad.&#8221;</p>
<p>Congressional Republicans <strong>have no coherent philosophy;</strong> by putting them in charge (because opposing them was out of the question), W. ripped out the wheel and left his Administration domestically rudderless.</p>
<p><strong>THAT</strong> was a lack of leadership.</p>
<p>On top of that, I doubt there&#8217;s ever been a more inept, disinterested Administration where communication was concerned.  &#8220;Incoherent&#8221; is too kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yashmak</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/05/enough-with-the-re-branding-crap/comment-page-3/#comment-534622</link>
		<dc:creator>Yashmak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=18366#comment-534622</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The only brand is the Palin brand&lt;/blockquote&gt; - StandardDeviation

Looks like America didn&#039;t want to buy that brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The only brand is the Palin brand</p></blockquote>
<p> &#8211; StandardDeviation</p>
<p>Looks like America didn&#8217;t want to buy that brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Republican Brand &#8212; Can It Survive On Its Libertarian Component? &#124; Popehat</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/05/enough-with-the-re-branding-crap/comment-page-3/#comment-533905</link>
		<dc:creator>The Republican Brand &#8212; Can It Survive On Its Libertarian Component? &#124; Popehat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=18366#comment-533905</guid>
		<description>[...] brand.&#8221; It comes off as an empty buzzword of the week. On the other hand, anything that pisses off Michelle Malkin can&#8217;t be all bad. Absent another shorthand for &#8220;that set of ideals that the party uses [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] brand.&#8221; It comes off as an empty buzzword of the week. On the other hand, anything that pisses off Michelle Malkin can&#8217;t be all bad. Absent another shorthand for &#8220;that set of ideals that the party uses [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrayLoess</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/05/enough-with-the-re-branding-crap/comment-page-2/#comment-533278</link>
		<dc:creator>GrayLoess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=18366#comment-533278</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;StandardDeviation said:&lt;/em&gt;

The only brand is the &lt;strike&gt;Reagan&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Palin&lt;/strong&gt; brand.

FIFY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>StandardDeviation said:</em></p>
<p>The only brand is the <strike>Reagan</strike> <strong>Palin</strong> brand.</p>
<p>FIFY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roghaz</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/05/enough-with-the-re-branding-crap/comment-page-2/#comment-533250</link>
		<dc:creator>Roghaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=18366#comment-533250</guid>
		<description>What should the Republican Pary do now? It should decide to actually stand for something. 

It should be leading a clear, unambiguous political movement for Capitalism (Laissez faire Capitalism -minimal government interference in economic affairs) That means no government subsidies to businesses, the abolishment of numerous regulatory agencies and the end to taxes that cripple business.

It should stand consistently for individual rights - including freedom of speech (no government censorship for any reason), freedom of association (no affirmative action and no quotas) and property rights (no estate tax, no progressive income tax and no expropriation of property for any reason).

It should stand for an unassailable national defense.

If the party could give up the ideology of appeasement to the left and unapologetically take up the ideology of freedom, it would finally be able to secure our country from harm and usher in an era of prosperity unprecedented in history. I don&#039;t think this is possible in the current philosophical atmosphere, but the more we push for this change, the more the party can be influenced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What should the Republican Pary do now? It should decide to actually stand for something. </p>
<p>It should be leading a clear, unambiguous political movement for Capitalism (Laissez faire Capitalism -minimal government interference in economic affairs) That means no government subsidies to businesses, the abolishment of numerous regulatory agencies and the end to taxes that cripple business.</p>
<p>It should stand consistently for individual rights &#8211; including freedom of speech (no government censorship for any reason), freedom of association (no affirmative action and no quotas) and property rights (no estate tax, no progressive income tax and no expropriation of property for any reason).</p>
<p>It should stand for an unassailable national defense.</p>
<p>If the party could give up the ideology of appeasement to the left and unapologetically take up the ideology of freedom, it would finally be able to secure our country from harm and usher in an era of prosperity unprecedented in history. I don&#8217;t think this is possible in the current philosophical atmosphere, but the more we push for this change, the more the party can be influenced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandyb</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/05/enough-with-the-re-branding-crap/comment-page-2/#comment-532972</link>
		<dc:creator>sandyb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=18366#comment-532972</guid>
		<description>I take issue with the phrase &quot;hard-line conservative.&quot;  &lt;em&gt;Ronaldus Magnus &lt;/em&gt;was one -- did he come across to anyone as strident or intractable?  Nope, he was a grandfather type who knew what he was doing, just using commonsense and he brought the country along -- a country, I might add, who lined his funeral cortege for miles and miles.  How many presidents ever had that kind of affection from so many?

Greta&#039;s having more Palin tonight, so I&#039;ll be checking that out soon, but the outrage of the evening was listening to Kondrake and Barnes on Britt Hume&#039;s show tonight.  They were busting on Republicans for not going after Hispanics in Texas, esp., and they seemed to be hinting at the illegal version.  They warned that TX would be Republicans didn&#039;t get with the program.  There&#039;s some &lt;em&gt;conservatism&lt;/em&gt; for ya -- ignore the rule of law and pander to the illegal vote since it just seems inevitable.  These morons just don&#039;t get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take issue with the phrase &#8220;hard-line conservative.&#8221;  <em>Ronaldus Magnus </em>was one &#8212; did he come across to anyone as strident or intractable?  Nope, he was a grandfather type who knew what he was doing, just using commonsense and he brought the country along &#8212; a country, I might add, who lined his funeral cortege for miles and miles.  How many presidents ever had that kind of affection from so many?</p>
<p>Greta&#8217;s having more Palin tonight, so I&#8217;ll be checking that out soon, but the outrage of the evening was listening to Kondrake and Barnes on Britt Hume&#8217;s show tonight.  They were busting on Republicans for not going after Hispanics in Texas, esp., and they seemed to be hinting at the illegal version.  They warned that TX would be Republicans didn&#8217;t get with the program.  There&#8217;s some <em>conservatism</em> for ya &#8212; ignore the rule of law and pander to the illegal vote since it just seems inevitable.  These morons just don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Send_Me</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/05/enough-with-the-re-branding-crap/comment-page-2/#comment-532967</link>
		<dc:creator>Send_Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=18366#comment-532967</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On November 5th, 2008 at 6:48 pm, Bill Grant said:
Well, you effectively voted for the product of a different organization, idiot.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
So, do you win over many people by calling them &quot;idiots&quot;? 
“If you can&#039;t answer a man&#039;s arguments, all is not lost; you can still call him vile names.” ~Elbert Hubbard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On November 5th, 2008 at 6:48 pm, Bill Grant said:<br />
Well, you effectively voted for the product of a different organization, idiot.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, do you win over many people by calling them &#8220;idiots&#8221;?<br />
“If you can&#8217;t answer a man&#8217;s arguments, all is not lost; you can still call him vile names.” ~Elbert Hubbard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaterBoyz</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/05/enough-with-the-re-branding-crap/comment-page-2/#comment-532963</link>
		<dc:creator>WaterBoyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=18366#comment-532963</guid>
		<description>Holy crap ... Campaign Carl just did 5-6 minutes of behind the scenes of the last few weeks between Palin and the McCain group.  Fighting and bickering and pointing blame.  Wow.  I&#039;m guessing that Palin was too hot and too straight forward and a go getter that the McCain group was none of the above.  This is what I read between the lines.

Preen Palin and Jendal for 2012.  Because all future elections will be media and technology driven.  Gone are the days of a roll of 1&#039;s and a soapbox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy crap &#8230; Campaign Carl just did 5-6 minutes of behind the scenes of the last few weeks between Palin and the McCain group.  Fighting and bickering and pointing blame.  Wow.  I&#8217;m guessing that Palin was too hot and too straight forward and a go getter that the McCain group was none of the above.  This is what I read between the lines.</p>
<p>Preen Palin and Jendal for 2012.  Because all future elections will be media and technology driven.  Gone are the days of a roll of 1&#8217;s and a soapbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nlebou</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/05/enough-with-the-re-branding-crap/comment-page-2/#comment-532946</link>
		<dc:creator>nlebou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=18366#comment-532946</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The McCain staff is in full attack mode against Governor Palin: She cost him the election. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Laura Ingram (sp) said this on O&#039;Reilly the other night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The McCain staff is in full attack mode against Governor Palin: She cost him the election. </p></blockquote>
<p>Laura Ingram (sp) said this on O&#8217;Reilly the other night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArizonaNeanderthal</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/05/enough-with-the-re-branding-crap/comment-page-2/#comment-532944</link>
		<dc:creator>ArizonaNeanderthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=18366#comment-532944</guid>
		<description>The McCain staff is in full attack mode against Governor Palin: She cost him the election. I was afraid of this-McCain and Goons never take responsibility for a screw up.
They have been pulling this crap since 1982. If only the whores had gone after BroBama in such a fashion. 
I would like to Brand some so called Republicans. Arnold Schwarzenegger is the poster child for closing the borders retroactively. He is a Kennedy pimp pure and simple.
---
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The McCain staff is in full attack mode against Governor Palin: She cost him the election. I was afraid of this-McCain and Goons never take responsibility for a screw up.<br />
They have been pulling this crap since 1982. If only the whores had gone after BroBama in such a fashion.<br />
I would like to Brand some so called Republicans. Arnold Schwarzenegger is the poster child for closing the borders retroactively. He is a Kennedy pimp pure and simple.<br />
&#8212;<br />
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purplepeep</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/05/enough-with-the-re-branding-crap/comment-page-2/#comment-532889</link>
		<dc:creator>purplepeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=18366#comment-532889</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Bill Grant: 
(Thanks to schoolhouse rock I already knew the preamble.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Was that in the 70s/Sesame Street heyday, Bill or ? Either way, it sounds after my TV-kid watchin&#039; time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Bill Grant:<br />
(Thanks to schoolhouse rock I already knew the preamble.)</p></blockquote>
<p>Was that in the 70s/Sesame Street heyday, Bill or ? Either way, it sounds after my TV-kid watchin&#8217; time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
