Comments on: Apology for disgusting ads

By: L.N. Smithee

L.N. Smithee — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:42:44 +0000

I have a BlogSpot blog that only generates a few dozen hits a week, and a lot of those are mine. I wanted to transfer the contents to a TownHall blog where it might be more visible. But when I realized that I couldn't stop it from being flanked by those PETA shock banners and other schtuff I don't agree with, I decided to forego the TH blog completely.

By: chep

chep — Sun, 09 Nov 2008 01:18:54 +0000

I say take PETA’s money and spend it on good old-fashioned Conservative stuff. It’s not like I would click on a PETA link.
I’ve seen ‘em before, I just laugh at them.

Giving them real estate anywhere justifies their cause and existance. Why not put Code Pink Ads all over here then?

By: mike.musculus

mike.musculus — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 23:09:37 +0000

I’ve never noticed any change in the ads, but then I’ve not access MM’s site from home recently.

I’ve been using the browers on Dad’s pda, (blazer), accessing the web VPN via a server at StepMom’s — MM’s page loads with little x-ed boxes where the ads go. The drawbacks, though, are no embedded pics or videos, and when comments go over 3 pages, if I try to start at page 1 the server resets and Dad’s LifeDrive goes SOD on me.

Oh well, its not like I’m an addict or anything… No! Really! I can stop at any time!

…not. just. right. now.

By: ent

ent — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 19:30:24 +0000

I didn’t see the ads in question, but now I am seeing, or rather hearing, an obnoxious ad for getting a “free Wii”. The ad plays a loud audio message every time I hit the main page. Very annoying.

By: JohnnyD

JohnnyD — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:19:05 +0000

On November 8th, 2008 at 9:55 am, mojoe said:
I only read michellemalkin.com for the articles.

Really.

I swear.

LOL! That’s a thread winner if I ever saw one!

By: JohnnyD

JohnnyD — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:17:15 +0000

On November 8th, 2008 at 11:16 am, plymouthacclaim said:
On November 7th, 2008 at 10:31 pm, chep said:
I say take PETA’s money and spend it on good old-fashioned Conservative stuff.

You mean like hunting gear?

Hmmm, tastes like chicken!

By: Donut44

Donut44 — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:06:06 +0000

I saw some disgusting ad a while back that said John McCain was the republican candidate for president. Luckily, I don’t see that ad anymore, good work.

By: plymouthacclaim

plymouthacclaim — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:16:37 +0000

On November 7th, 2008 at 10:31 pm, chep said:

I say take PETA’s money and spend it on good old-fashioned Conservative stuff. It’s not like I would click on a PETA link.

I’ve seen ‘em before, I just laugh at them.

By: ArizonaNeanderthal

ArizonaNeanderthal — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 15:39:38 +0000

Racy women? Where? I missed them?

By: mojoe

mojoe — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:55:43 +0000

I only read michellemalkin.com for the articles.

Really.

I swear.

By: Tom Blogical

Tom Blogical — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:39:42 +0000

Thanks Michelle. I knew you wouldn’t stand for that very long.

By: corona

corona — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:19:43 +0000

A previous poster is allying with the Kos Kidz. Listen, pal - this is my computer. I get to use it as I see fit. The Kossack regime wants its minions "subscribe" if they block ads. If that's your philosophy, you are more than welcome to defect.

By: backwoods conservative

backwoods conservative — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 13:36:19 +0000

Those Russian models should give up. They’ll never be as beautiful as Michelle Malkin.

By: RobM1981

RobM1981 — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 13:05:01 +0000

Do you mean those pictures of Obama, all over this site?

If so, I agree: an apology is warranted.

By: Stillwaiting

Stillwaiting — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 06:27:43 +0000

I do not think an apology is needed, but I do not see that an apology has been made! )

Don’t get mad at me, I think Michelle is the greatest. I refer to myself as a “Malkin conservative”. But there is no apology.