Senators to Paulson: You lied, TARP died

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 13, 2008 03:41 PM

Three GOP Senators have sent Treasury Secretary Hank “Never mind” Paulson a “joint letter of concern.” I’ll have more on this abominable subject in my syndicated column tomorrow.

Joint Letter of Concern to Secretary Paulson After His Announcement to the Change Intent of the Troubled Asset Relief Program

November 13, 2008

Dear Secretary Paulson:

We are writing to express our deep concern over your announcement this morning that the Department of the Treasury will halt all plans to purchase trouble mortgage assets through the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). We are concerned that the program has been fundamentally changed from its original intent and worry that continued changes may erode the structures of accountability put in to protect taxpayers.

When legislation authorizing the TARP was first proposed to members of Congress in mid-September, its primary component was a program to allow the Secretary of the Treasury to purchase “toxic” mortgage assets from financial institutions. The primary reason for this course of action, we were told, was to assist the market in discovering the price of these assets and to return liquidity to the financial markets.

At a hearing of the Senate Banking Committee on September 23, 2008, you made the following comments on the urgent necessity of a troubled asset purchase program:

We have proposed a program to remove troubled assets from the system. This troubled asset relief program has to be properly designed for immediate implementation and be sufficiently large to have maximum impact and restore market confidence. It must also protect the taxpayer to the maximum extent possible, and include provisions that ensure transparency and oversight while also ensuring the program can be implemented quickly and run effectively.

This troubled asset purchase program on its own is the single most effective thing we can do to help homeowners, the American people and stimulate our economy.

Although the legislation was passed on October 3, the program was never implemented and now has been officially abandoned in favor of alternative plans after little more than a month. Such a rapid reversal raises questions about the TARP’s original design as well as the propriety of future plans.

Congress never intended for the TARP to be a blank check that could be spent with unlimited discretion. To ensure proper boundaries are in place to protect the taxpayer, we hope and expect that congressional approval will be sought by the administration before further changes are made.

Sincerely,

U.S. Senator Tom Coburn, M.D., U.S. Senator Richard Burr, U.S. Senator David Vitter

Posted in: Subprime crisis

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Kick the Anthill » Coburn is a bigger person than I am
  2. The College Politico » Blog Archive » Forbes: Bailout Costs 5 Trillion… So Far
  3. Really? No Formal Action Has Been Taken To Fill The Independent Oversight Posts Established By Congress When It Approved The Bailout | Right Voices
  4. The Crap Sandwich Has a New Flavor « Trust, But Verify
  5. The Rude News » Blog Archive » Checks & Balances
  6. GOP Senators to Paulson: You Lied | The American Pundit
  7. Free In Idaho! » Blog Archive » Losing Our Grip
  8. Paulson Lied–Economy Died or Bailout Bolshevik Bureaucrats Corrupt Capitalism Credit China « Pronk Palisades
  9. Melissa officinalis
  10. Paulson bait and switch | Smoke, Mirrors and Reality of Current Events
  11. Pasadena Real Estate Blog Interviews Dr. Ryan C. Amacher, Professor of Economics » Pasadena California Real Estate Blog

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

  1. #101
    On November 13th, 2008 at 9:48 pm, cabrerski said:

    Rabbid,

    That was the original Saturday Night Live (when they were funny).

  2. #102
    On November 13th, 2008 at 10:42 pm, America1st said:

    Not That I am against holding Paulson accountable, but these dummies voted for the crap sandwhich KNOWING HE WOULD HAVE UNREVIEWABLE DISCRETION.

    What did they think was going to happen? Is this really a surprise to them? If so we are in a lot more trouble than we realize because WE sure saw this coming.

  3. #103
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:34 am, Joy said:

    Well, no surprises that Paulson isn’t going to do what was a dire emergency!!! I’m with America1st in that WE the people knew what apparently our illustrious Congresscritters couldn’t figure out.

    But it seems to me that we should be glad he’s not buying up a bunch of toxic mortgages… is that at least one good thing? kinda like a piece of candy hidden in the Crap Sandwich?

    Ewww… never mind.

  4. #104
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:41 am, fred5676 said:

    Congress: “Oh, waiter, I ordered a crap sandwich, and there’s a problem. It tastes like crap!”

  5. #105
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:42 am, graysonret said:

    I see another FDR (Obama) in the White House, replacing another Hoover (Bush) and an economy in recession. The new President and another democratic congress, once again, are going to make the same mistakes that were made in the 30s. History repeats itself. Bailouts and more regulations will have the same effect now, as back then…a depression. Investments will go down as people refuse to put their money in something that is changing daily, with the government scrambling to control things. Companies will not hire or, worse, let workers go, to stay afloat. Politicians, refusing to look at the mistakes of the past, see only their own security. Regulations hurt economies, not improve them. Economics 101.

  6. #106
    On November 14th, 2008 at 6:55 am, johnsteele said:

    On November 13th, 2008 at 4:28 pm, thetoysurgeon said:
    Let’s start building the guillotines now. We need a leader (non-gov) of the people who will show the petitions signed by the people of America to unseat these bastards, a leader who will take it to these scumbags, a leader to organize us. I will follow if someone comes forth. I don’t mean “that one’ either.

    On November 4th the people of this country spoke and turned over the reins of government to the very people who created the mess in the first place. Th inmates are now running the asylum.

  7. #107
    On November 14th, 2008 at 10:42 am, Kwill said:

    Want to see something amusing? Get on Google News and simply enter “Paulson”. Then just read allll the headlines & clips.

  8. #108
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:05 pm, By Choice said:

    Why–she askes with tongue in cheek–is everyone getting so excited about this. Prefect Paulson was given a blank check to do what ever he needed to get the economy right–so now he has another plan-he’ll probably have another one or two before the Obamessiah takes over and really fixes everything.

    sarc off/

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

You must be logged in to post a comment.

What is Barney Frank up to now?

July 1, 2009 12:13 PM by Michelle Malkin

67 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

And next: A Fine Print Czar

June 30, 2009 06:00 PM by Michelle Malkin

75 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

After the “Special Master of Compensation”

June 9, 2009 04:39 PM by Michelle Malkin

82 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

Making Government Motors official

May 19, 2009 04:52 PM by Michelle Malkin

114 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

Washington can’t meet the Cheerios Standard

May 15, 2009 09:07 AM by Michelle Malkin

79 Comments | 16 Trackbacks

California wants a piece of TARP

May 14, 2009 08:41 AM by Michelle Malkin

49 Comments | 6 Trackbacks


Categories: Subprime crisis



Legal Insurrection

» Blogging From Tegucigalpa

Conservatives4Palin

» Reactions Round-up