Who will quell the anti-Prop. 8 rage?

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 13, 2008 02:28 PM

Pssst. Hey, “Lightworker.” Yeah, you, “Mr. Soul-fixer.” Bearer of “Hope and Change.”

Across the country, there are broken souls in need of fixing. They are the opponents of Proposition 8, California’s traditional marriage initiative, which passed 52-48 (the same margin you won by, Lightworker).

Perhaps you would care to weigh in and work your healing magic on the anti-Prop. 8 rabble-rousers who continue to wreak havoc on Mormon churches in several cities and states and blacklisting peaceful voters who supported the ballot measure.

It is getting very ugly out there and no one in the Democratic leadership has stepped up to condemn the insane rage, to borrow a phrase.

Where art thou, Lightworker?

***

Sad:

The artistic director at California’s largest nonprofit musical theater company resigned Wednesday amid protests over his donation to a campaign to ban gay marriage in the state.

Scott Eckern stepped down from his job at the California Musical Theater in Sacramento after some gay activists called for a theater boycott.

He said he is leaving “after prayerful consideration to protect the organization and to help the healing in the local theatergoing and creative community.”

Eckern said he “chose to act upon my belief that the traditional definition of marriage should be preserved” but had no idea his contribution would generate such controversy. He said his sister is a lesbian in a domestic partnership, which he understands to carry the same legal rights as marriage.

The boycott calls — led by artists including “Hairspray” composer Marc Shaiman — began after activists learned Eckern contributed $1,000 to the Yes on 8 campaign.

***
Previous:

Anti-Prop. 8 mob: It’s over. You lost. Move on.


Schwarzenegger pours fuel on anti-Prop. 8 fire

Unhinged losers: Prop. 8 opponents threaten Mormons and Catholics

Who supported Prop. 8?

First graders take school field trip…to teacher’s gay wedding

Public school politicking and Proposition 8

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Proposition 8

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #301
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:41 am, Wildcatter1980 said:

    I am shocked and dismayed about this bad behavior.

    The old saying, “It takes one to know one.” comes to mind. The far left is always accusing conservatives in general and Republicans in particular of being thuggish in how they try to go about effecting change and implementing their policy positions. Some go so far as to say “Rethuglicans” they are so outraged.

    Could it be that these far left loons are the ones who cannot control their base urges and are employing this thuggish behavior?

    What is more disappointing though is the total lack of condemnation from Democrat political leaders in general and President-elect Barack Obama in particular. However, we probably should not be surprised as his record is one of not bucking his political base such as the far left loons.

  2. #302
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:46 am, happy2behere said:

    Nor have I ever heard anyone “doom them all to hell.” Not ever.

    I am not shocked but quite worried that you buy into the stereotype that faith is a form of bigotry.

  3. #303
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:55 am, AniMEL said:

    Omu is right about one thing: teenagers who are gay (or marked as possibly gay by other kids) are mercilessly tormented by their peers. I vehemently denied being gay when I was a kid, and I was tortured. By the time I got to jr. high school I had been called every anti-gay slur you can imagine and beaten up more times than I could remember. Then it only got worse.

    I’m not really bitter about the experience. It helped make me the person I am today. I’m not saying I’d go out for coffee with those people now, but I don’t hate them, either. Things haven’t changed much. Teachers may make a big to-do about a shirt that says “straight pride,” but that kid’s peers won’t beat the living daylights out of him. That can be more demoralizing than anybody realizes.

    I may not agree with a lot of Omu’s arguments, but I do agree with that one.

  4. #304
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, SoCal said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:46 am, happy2behere said:

    I am not shocked but quite worried that you buy into the stereotype that faith is a form of bigotry.

    Maybe the problem is that you don’t understand what gays hear all the time from the conservative religious folk…

    By social conservative activist Bill Whatcott:

    Kill the Homosexual

    Kill The homosexual
    You are the one we despise
    Day in day out your words compromise lies
    I will love watching you die
    Soon it will be and by your own demise
    Buried in hypocrisy
    Lacerate your faith in sodomy
    Morally diseased
    On the cross of Calvary your body bashed defeated stabbed
    Blessing as you hate
    Loyal to your enemies
    Monetary faith
    As him you will pay for the lies of your prophecy
    God wants you dead
    Kill the homosexual, kill the homosexual
    Kill the homosexual, kill the homosexual
    Kill the homosexual, kill the homosexual, kill the homosexual
    Armies of darkness unite
    Destroy their bath houses and porn shops with fire
    Where in this world will you hide
    Sentenced to death, the anointment of Sodom
    In due time your path leads to me
    Put you out of your misery
    The death of prediction
    Kill the homosexual
    Kill the homosexual, dead!

  5. #305
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:06 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, SoCal said:

    Maybe the problem is that you don’t understand what gays hear all the time from the conservative religious folk…

    By social conservative activist Bill Whatcott:

    Who is Bill Whatcott?

    And if the gays don’t like his ability to practice the 1st Amendment, TOUGH!

  6. #306
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:11 pm, SoCal said:

    And if the gays don’t like his ability to practice the 1st Amendment, TOUGH!

    There ya go… the point is made.

    My job here is done.

    Hi Yo Silver, AWAY!

  7. #307
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:16 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:55 am, AniMEL said:
    Omu is right about one thing: teenagers who are gay (or marked as possibly gay by other kids) are mercilessly tormented by their peers.

    So are kids they don’t like, kinds that dress differnetly, kids that speak differently, kids that don’t live in the same neighborhood as they do, kids that makes better grades than they do, kids that are worse at sports than they are…

    The list goes on. You want a Supreme Court decision making it a federal crime for kids to not get the widdle fweelings hurt while they are in school?

  8. #308
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:26 pm, HeatherRadish said:

    Omu is right about one thing: teenagers who are gay (or marked as possibly gay by other kids) are mercilessly tormented by their peers.

    So are redheads, smart kids, kids wearing the wrong label on their pants, kids who don’t like football, stoner kids, straight-edge kids, Christian kids, pagan kids…

  9. #309
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, right4life said:

    Maybe the problem is that you don’t understand what gays hear all the time from the conservative religious folk…

    we’re hearing from gay folks right now…and yes this type of hatred is what christians hear all the time from them.

  10. #310
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:44 pm, right4life said:

    Who is Bill Whatcott?

    And if the gays don’t like his ability to practice the 1st Amendment, TOUGH!

    he’s a canadian. so he doesn’t have the first amendment.

    socal can always point to an individual nut, but they cannot point to anything comparable to the riots we see now from the ‘tolerant’ gay community, from christians.

  11. #311
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:46 pm, right4life said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, SoCal said:

    oh and uh post your source please. interesting that you did not… :roll:

  12. #312
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:49 pm, right4life said:

    oh I did a little research…

    None the less, Bill Whatcott does not want homosexuals to be killed. While Bill Whatcott posted the above song on this flyer (with some minor redactions to the original text) advocating murder and violence, he wants to be very clear this flyer SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED as an incitement to violence. In fact, Bill Whatcott would much prefer homosexuals repent of their sins and turn to Jesus Christ so they can inherit the Kingdom of Heaven. Bill Whatcott looks forward to spending the rest of eternity fellowshipping with millions of repentant and forgiven homosexuals in the loving presence of our risen Saviour and Lord Jesus Christ! “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.” John 3:16, 17. As for the picture of Pseudo Human Rights Chairwoman Lori Andreachuk, placed on the groin of a homosexual receiving oral sex? It should be interpreted as an insult, a unique method of ridicule and a display of utter contempt for her undeserved position of authority.

    To find out why Bill Whatcott redacted a terribly hateful song to make this seemingly hateful flyer and place Lori Andreachuk’s face where he did, go to http://www.freenorthamerica.ca, click on “board links,” click on “Gatherings and Activism.”

    looks like socal is a lying piece of trash.

  13. #313
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:49 pm, right4life said:

    oops forgot the link:

    link

  14. #314
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:51 pm, right4life said:

    So why would I now publish a flyer apparently calling for the death of homosexuals?

    Well check out this cute little song Alberta Human Rights bigot and sophist Lori Andreachuk ruled is not a hate crime and subject to no legal censure. Please keep in mind Lori Andeachuk recently fined a Christian Pastor, Rev Stephen Boisson, $7,000 and gagged him from speaking out on homosexuality for life, for saying the Bible teaches homosexuality is a sin and homosexual activism is detrimental to children. To read about Rev. Boisson’s “crime” and the punishment imposed on him go here: http://www.freenorthamerica.ca/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1385 . Anyways according to Andreachuk while non violently calling homosexuality a sin (historic Christian teaching) is illegal, calling for the violent murder of Christians is not:

    Here is a song which is available in Alberta music stores today published by a band called “Deicide.”

    Kill The Christian
    You are the one we despise
    Day in day out your words compromise lies
    I will love watching you die
    Soon it will be and by your own demise
    Buried in hypocrisy
    Lacerate your faith in God
    Morally diseased
    On the cross of Calvary your body bashed defeated stabbed
    Blessing as you hate
    Loyal to your enemies
    Monetary faith
    As him you will pay for the lies of your prophecy
    Satan wants you dead
    Kill the Christian, kill the Christian
    Kill the Christian, kill the Christian
    Kill the Christian, kill the Christian, kill the Christian
    Armies of darkness unite
    Destroy their temples and churches with fire
    Where in this world will you hide
    Sentenced to death, the anointment of Christ
    In due time your path leads to me
    Put you out of your misery
    The death of prediction
    Kill the Christian
    Kill the Christian, dead!

    you really are a piece of work socal.

  15. #315
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:51 pm, SoCal said:

    looks like socal is a lying piece of trash.

    Yep, the evil name calling is what your kind of people do..

    Once again, you made my point!

    Hi Yo Silver!

  16. #316
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:54 pm, right4life said:

    Yep, the evil name calling is what your kind of people do..

    Once again, you made my point!

    Hi Yo Silver!

    in your dreams. I’ve just proven what a lying wacko you are.

  17. #317
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:03 pm, right4life said:

    thanks socal for illustrating the lies and distortions that the gay movement is relies, and is built upon!

  18. #318
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:15 pm, SoCal said:

    I’ve just proven what a lying wacko you are.

    Doesn’t your magical being in the sky supposedly say that you should not judge lest ye be judged, or something mystical like that? Yet you always seem to be spewing your judgement and hate where ever you go.

    Homosexuals are some of the kindest and best Americans we have, yet you evil people want to call them names and make their lives miserable.

    Some of the religious people I know are good and loving people, but you jihadists are just downright scary and dangerous.

  19. #319
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:19 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:15 pm, SoCal said:
    Homosexuals are some of the kindest and best Americans we have, yet you evil people want to call them names and make their lives miserable.

    Were those “kindest and best Americans” you are talking about the ones that slapped the cross out of the old lady’s hand and stomped on it? Or maybe they were the ones parading down the street naked in public? Or perhaps you mean the ones that deliberatley disrupted a church service?

    So who is making who’s life miserable, SoCal?

  20. #320
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:20 pm, right4life said:

    Doesn’t your magical being in the sky supposedly say that you should not judge lest ye be judged, or something mystical like that? Yet you always seem to be spewing your judgement and hate where ever you go.

    at least I don’t have to LIE and SMEAR people to make a point, like you do!!

    Homosexuals are some of the kindest and best Americans we have, yet you evil people want to call them names and make their lives miserable.

    when you can tell the truth, let me know.

    if you had any honor or decency at all you would apologize for smearing that man. but you don’t. you’re a typical gay activist..a hate-filled lying nut-case.

  21. #321
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:24 pm, SoCal said:

    hate-filled lying nut-case.

    god is love… lol

  22. #322
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:26 pm, right4life said:

    god is love… lol

    your god, and you, definately are not lol

  23. #323
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:27 pm, SoCal said:

    Were those “kindest and best Americans” you are talking about the ones that slapped the cross out of the old lady’s hand and stomped on it?

    If you tried to take away my right to be married to my wife, I would KILL you dead.

    And that is what you losers did. Gay people could be married in California a week ago, and you religious nuts took that away.

    You are lucky they only slapped the cross out of that old bat’s hand. She is one STUPID religious nut.

  24. #324
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:30 pm, right4life said:

    If you tried to take away my right to be married to my wife, I would KILL you dead.

    are you threatening me? I’d really like to see you try. :P

  25. #325
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:31 pm, right4life said:

    If you tried to take away my right to be married to my wife, I would KILL you dead.

    And that is what you losers did.

    so you’re going to go out and kill people huh? I think MM should report you to the authorities.

    you are a sick EVIL deranged piece of sh**

  26. #326
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:39 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:27 pm, SoCal said:
    If you tried to take away my right to be married to my wife, I would KILL you dead.

    And that is what you losers did. Gay people could be married in California a week ago, and you religious nuts took that away.

    You are lucky they only slapped the cross out of that old bat’s hand. She is one STUPID religious nut.

    BEHOLD! Liberal tolerance in action.

    Gays could NEVER be legally married, as marriage is between one man and one woman. And when asked to vote on the subject, the electorate of California REJECTED gay marriage.

    Nothing was taken away, as you cannot take away what you don’t have.

    So you condone the violence against your opponent, but whine about protest against those you support?

  27. #327
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:49 pm, SoCal said:

    you are a sick EVIL deranged piece of sh**

    You religious nuts are one angry and vicious bunch aren’t you?

    Is “sh**” one of the holy words that comes up when you are speaking in tongues and rolling around on the floor with the snakes?

  28. #328
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:54 pm, nail49 said:

    You are lucky they only slapped the cross out of that old bat’s hand. She is one STUPID religious nut.

    What of the thugs who did the slapping? Are you condoning actions beyond their slapping the cross out of her hands?

    Another shining example of the tolerance of the left.

    Put the cross in a gay person’s hand and let it get slapped to the ground because he/she is a STUPID religious nut and where do you stand then?

    Do you even know the definition of hypocrisy?

  29. #329
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:00 pm, SoCal said:

    Put the cross in a gay person’s hand and let it get slapped to the ground because he/she is a STUPID religious nut and where do you stand then?

    If an old gay lady showed up at a religious nut protest she probably wouldn’t have been holding a cross, she is probably more intelligent than that.

    But let us say that she did. Based on your comments here, she probably would have been tarred and feathered by you people.

  30. #330
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:02 pm, right4life said:

    You religious nuts are one angry and vicious bunch aren’t you?

    not nearly as deranged vicious SICK and evil as you gay scum are. you’ve just proven it ‘honey’

    you gonna threaten me some more?

    you’d never say this to my face ‘honey’ and we both know it… :P

  31. #331
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:02 pm, right4life said:

    you people

    racist piece of sh**

  32. #332
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:07 pm, huggybear said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 3:04 am, conservative in europe said:

    What you do with your sexuality is a choice. Who you are attracted to sexually may be determined by physical and mental factors but how one acts upon those impulses is entirely a choice.

    Oh my. You are revealing far more about yourself than I think you realize. I don’t know many people — gay, straight, or otherwise — who actually believe they have chosen their own sexual preference. Do you have something you would like to share with the class?

  33. #333
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:16 pm, Joy said:

    SoCal – Then you haven’t been reading. The majority of the religious folks here wouldn’t care if someone with a dissenting opinion showed up to a free speech rally at City Hall.

    And you won’t find a practicing Mormon anywhere who would either shut someone up or tar and feather them. We’d probably invite her to Family Home Evening though. Or maybe a Pot Luck at Church. Or to Sunday service.

  34. #334
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:20 pm, Joy said:

    huggybear – I personally know many gay people who have told me they have chosen their lifestyle. The women because they hate men, and the men because “he knew he could indulge in lust with men that no woman would allow.”

    While some others claim they are born like that. It doesn’t matter. The point is, we all have control over how we respond to our inclinations or temptations.

  35. #335
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:20 pm, SoCal said:

    And you won’t find a practicing Mormon anywhere who would either shut someone up or tar and feather them. We’d probably invite her to Family Home Evening though. Or maybe a Pot Luck at Church. Or to Sunday service.

    I really don’t mind religion. My mother was very religious and my sibling is a Christian Minister. I just get angry at all the hate some of the nuts spew.

    Most of the Mormons that I know are VERY good people, good Americans, and raise their children well.

    I guess the loud and angry, profanity spewing religious people responding on this blog don’t represent most good religious folk.

    I will take a break now.. gonna have some lunch.

  36. #336
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:23 pm, Joy said:

    right4life – I understand tensions are running high. But you are really not doing your cause or your Savior any favors by adopting the ugly attitude.

    Why not leave that behavior to them?

  37. #337
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:24 pm, Joy said:

    SoCal – Understood…

  38. #338
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:27 pm, right4life said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:23 pm, Joy said:
    right4life – I understand tensions are running high. But you are really not doing your cause or your Savior any favors by adopting the ugly attitude.

    so reacting to a threat is ugly, but I find it interesting that you have not comdemned socal for threatening to MURDER people.

    as far as I am concerned what I said is true. socal is a piece of sh**.

    and no I’m not sorry for it. and if they’re offended too bad. I’m offended by people calling for the murder of those they disagree with.

    and being nice isn’t going to convert someone like that. they are looking for people to bully.

  39. #339
    On November 14th, 2008 at 3:18 pm, nail49 said:

    Based on your comments here, she probably would have been tarred and feathered by you people.

    SoCal, you and any other gay person are welcome in our church at any time. Unless you ACT UP you will NOT have anything slapped out of your hands, nor are you going to get tarred and feathered. You will be treated as any other sinner there (which would include ALL the church members) because we realize we are only human and have a sin nature — “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” Romans 3:23.

    Doesn’t your magical being in the sky supposedly say that you should not judge lest ye be judged, or something mystical like that?

    My God, who will NOT be mocked (not a threat on my part, but a promise on His part) is the only judge and we are not judging, merely stating what He has taught us to do — hate the sin, love the sinner.

    You might want to visit a real church some time — one that preaches God’s Word, not one that waters it down so as not to offend anyone — and also not one you make up in your fantasy world. Contrary to what you might believe, you won’t spontaneously burst into flames as you cross the threshhold!

  40. #340
    On November 14th, 2008 at 3:46 pm, SoCal said:

    nail49 and Joy actually sound like they might be the kind of religious folk that I knew growing up and ARE worth having around… :o )

    The angry in your face people (that I love to poke at and expose) are another thing completely.

    SoCal, you and any other gay person are welcome in our church at any time.

    Thank you. I actually spent MANY years in a real church, and it was fun and fine until I asked as a young adult, “What happened to the souls of the millions of Jews killed by Hitler?” and I was told, “They are burning in hell.” …and, well, I decided that I didn’t want to be a member of that club anymore…..

    At least the Mormons, with their attempt to baptize the souls of the dead Jews, are TRYING to be loving and kind in their own way. The Christian minister just said, “Burning in hell.” and left it at that.

  41. #341
    On November 14th, 2008 at 3:53 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 3:46 pm, SoCal said:
    The angry in your face people (that I love to poke at and expose) are another thing completely.

    Those are the gay activists whose viloence and extortion you are defending.

    Thank you. I actually spent MANY years in a real church, and it was fun and fine until I asked as a young adult, “What happened to the souls of the millions of Jews killed by Hitler?” and I was told, “They are burning in hell.” …and, well, I decided that I didn’t want to be a member of that club anymore…..

    At least the Mormons, with their attempt to baptize the souls of the dead Jews, are TRYING to be loving and kind in their own way. The Christian minister just said, “Burning in hell.” and left it at that.

    So the Mormons are welcome to believe that a dead person can be saved, but Christians are not allowed to believe that Jesus is “…the Way, the Truth, and the Light. No man comes to the Father except through…” Him?

    Again, you are a fine example of Liberals tolerance and acceptance.

  42. #342
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:01 pm, right4life said:

    The angry in your face people (that I love to poke at and expose) are another thing completely.

    you mean gays like you who threaten to MURDER people :roll:

    the only thing you expose is your own hatred, intolerance, and idiocy.

  43. #343
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:39 pm, SoCal said:
    right4life said:

    you mean gays like you who threaten to MURDER people :roll:

    Now I see the problem with your understanding of your bible..YOU CAN’T READ!

    I said, “If you tried to take away my right to be married to my wife

    WIFE… you homophobic goofball!

  44. #344
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:41 pm, happy2behere said:

    SOCAL says that the violent homsexual protestors (the reason for this thread) are not representative of homsexuals as a whole. OK. So therefore one can say that Bill Wallcott (whoever he is) is not represesntative of all Christians?

    My point was that stereotyping faith as bigotry (especially by using the likes of Bill Wallcott) shows your flawed reasoning. If you have no faith and all you have is reason…

  45. #345
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:44 pm, SoCal said:

    So the Mormons are welcome to believe that a dead person can be saved,

    Yes, they can believe what they want, and you can believe what you want, and if they want to sit in their church and pray for Jew’s souls, they can, but for any religious group to be sooooo sure about everything that they try to determine what others can do based on their belief system is just primitive and odd.

  46. #346
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:45 pm, Joy said:

    Mormons believe people have a second chance after death, as Peter and Paul made mention of, to hear the True Gospel of Jesus Christ, not a distorted one, and accept.

    Our Heavenly Father loves all His children and the plan means to save as many as will accept. If someone never hears, or hears a twisted version and rejects that twisted version, or a child dies prior to the age of accountability, or many other reasons, they are not consigned to burn in hell for all eternity.

    That’s why we do the baptisms for the dead. If they accept on the other side, their ordinance work is done. It is also the link between the generations of mankind. Sealing us all as families in eternity.

    People that believe that seem to think Satan gets to make the rules and Heavenly Father had to scramble to come up with a plan B that only saves a small percent of His children.

    I happen to believe that God made the plan, Jesus executed it, and the vast majority of His children will be saved. God wins… not the Devil.

    Jesus died for ALL.

    It’s far more complex than can be typed in a blog in a couple of paragraphs.

  47. #347
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:47 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:39 pm, SoCal said:

    Now I see the problem with your understanding of your bible..YOU CAN’T READ!

    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:27 pm, SoCal said:

    You are lucky they only slapped the cross out of that old bat’s hand. She is one STUPID religious nut.

    No we understand perfectly, SoCal. You will excuse anything and everthing gays do, yet use the same hatred and threats of violence of anyone that dares to disagree with your vaunted opinion.

    The gay community does not need your hatred and intolerance. It has plenty of its own!

  48. #348
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:47 pm, Joy said:

    “People that believe only a small fraction of people get saved” is how the 4th paragraph should start.

  49. #349
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:49 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:44 pm, SoCal said:
    Yes, they can believe what they want, and you can believe what you want, and if they want to sit in their church and pray for Jew’s souls, they can, but for any religious group to be sooooo sure about everything that they try to determine what others can do based on their belief system is just primitive and odd.

    I guess when it’s rolling around in your head, it must not sound so contridicting as it does when you type it.

    What a maroon!

  50. #350
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:50 pm, SoCal said:

    OK. So therefore one can say that Bill Wallcott (whoever he is) is not represesntative of all Christians?

    I will agree, but wouldn’t you agree that a few posters on this site that claim to be Christians don’t act very Christain?

    I mean, most Christians I know or have known didn’t act all crazy and rude. They didn’t take themselves too seriously and understood that the world is large and opinions are going to vary based on experience and geographical local.

  51. #351
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:52 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:47 pm, Joy said:
    “People that believe only a small fraction of people get saved” is how the 4th paragraph should start.

    Joy, I am not trying to turn this into a debate on the merits of the Mormon faith. My point was that SoCal is very selective in what he wants to allow religious organizations to believe. Mormons can beleive you can baptize the dead, but Christians are not allowed to believe the Jesus is the only way to be saved.

    Like I said, selective indignation.

  52. #352
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:54 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:50 pm, SoCal said:
    OK. So therefore one can say that Bill I will agree, but wouldn’t you agree that a few posters on this site that claim to be Christians don’t act very Christain?

    I mean, most Christians I know or have known didn’t act all crazy and rude. They didn’t take themselves too seriously and understood that the world is large and opinions are going to vary based on experience and geographical local.

    Again, demanding tolerance and acceptance from others, yet offering none yourself. Sorry, SoCal, but when you go out of your wqay to act like a jerk to other people, deliberatly insulting them and their religion, don’t expect sunshine and rainbows in return!

  53. #353
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:54 pm, SoCal said:

    No we understand perfectly, SoCal. You will excuse anything and everthing gays do, yet use the same hatred and threats of violence of anyone that dares to disagree with your vaunted opinion.

    MY vaulted opinion?

    lol… toooo funny.

  54. #354
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:54 pm, happy2behere said:

    SOCAL is right. To force our religion down others’ throats is wrongheaded. But that is not what the voters of CAL have done with Prop. 8. All they have done is resisted the redefinition of marriage. Civil Unions give people all the legal rights they are entitled to. Redfining marriage threatens the entire existance of the church. And with all the violent protests how can Christians think otherwise?

  55. #355
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:58 pm, happy2behere said:

    Socal – missed your previous post. Yes, the nasties on this site get too riled up at times. It’s a shame Christians sometimes cant act like Christians. I have got to go now. Peace be with you.

  56. #356
    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:09 pm, AniMEL said:

    SoCal, I try hard to stay away from personal attacks, but your ilk and your behavior have so incensed me that I’m not sure I care right now. I’m sick of the threats, I’m sick of the taunting, I’m sick of the hypocrisy. Grow the hell up.

    This is not worth getting your boxers in a wad over. It is not worth jail time. And the assertion that you would kill over this? You are insane. This sort of behavior makes us all look like idiots, and I refuse to claim your BS.

    Knock it off. Go home, cool off, and think about how you can rationally talk to people instead of beating them up with your freakin’ rhetoric! Take a page from Mahatma Ghandi’s book and KNOCK THIS S— OFF!!!

  57. #357
    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:09 pm, SoCal said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:54 pm, happy2behere said:

    SOCAL is right. To force our religion down others’ throats is wrongheaded. But that is not what the voters of CAL have done with Prop. 8. All they have done is resisted the redefinition of marriage. Civil Unions give people all the legal rights they are entitled to. Redfining marriage threatens the entire existance of the church. And with all the violent protests how can Christians think otherwise?

    See, a reasonable person that makes sense.

    It is the loud in your face nuts that give religious groups a bad name. Like the gay nuts that ride in the parades sticking their business in everyone’s face.

    I don’t blame you or them for your beliefs. It is just when you castigate others for not holding same… or act like your’s don’t stink.

    It only takes a few bad apples on both sides of any issue to make everyone look bad.. How many Christian ministers or Catholic priests wander down the gay side from time to time?

    Jim Jones preached that many of his male followers were in denial about their homosexuality, conditioning those followers to accept him if he approached with a sexual advance.

    And he defused any accusations of sexual perversion on his part by claiming that he gained no personal pleasure from his acts, which he called a “great sacrifice.”

    I think the thing to do is just not throw rocks… we all have glass windows.

  58. #358
    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:12 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:09 pm, SoCal said:

    I don’t blame you or them for your beliefs. It is just when you castigate others for not holding same… or act like your’s don’t stink.

    Which is exactly what you have been doing this entire thread, SoCal.

    So spare us the lectures and your holier-than-thou attitude.

    Like I said earlier, don’t come in here going out of your way to be a jerk to everyone and then tell us we need to be civil.

  59. #359
    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:14 pm, SoCal said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:09 pm, AniMEL said:

    SoCal, I try hard to stay away from personal attacks, but your ilk and your behavior have so incensed me that I’m not sure I care right now. I’m sick of the threats, I’m sick of the taunting, I’m sick of the hypocrisy. Grow the hell up.

    You are too funny… get over yourself. You are not that important to the world, and not at all to me.

  60. #360
    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:16 pm, SoCal said:

    So spare us the lectures and your holier-than-thou attitude.

    But you see, I think I am right, and you are wrong. My opinion is better than yours in MY opinion, and you think some great spirit has your back. When we die, we will meet and see who is right. Until then, get used to others not agreeing with you.

  61. #361
    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:18 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:16 pm, SoCal said:

    But you see, I think I am right, and you are wrong. My opinion is better than yours in MY opinion, and you think some great spirit has your back. When we die, we will meet and see who is right. Until then, get used to others not agreeing with you.

    No, you think you are right, and that anyone that does not hold the same opinion as you is stupid and has no right to that opinion.

    And here’s some advise for you, my friend. If you are going to live your life as if there is no God, then you’d better be right!

    See you on the other side… briefly!

  62. #362
    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:21 pm, SoCal said:

    Well, I would love to stick around and play, but I have to go now… good luck with your homophobia and all that!

    muah! :o )~

  63. #363
    On November 14th, 2008 at 7:21 pm, Oh-nO said:

    That will not be the last of SoCal, a dog will return to its own vomit and a pig to the mud. He has heard the truth and refuses to listen. A homophobe is one who is afraid of homosexuals, he has it all mixed up. I fear no man, I fear God alone.

  64. #364
    On November 14th, 2008 at 7:35 pm, right4life said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:39 pm, SoCal said:

    I said, “If you tried to take away my right to be married to my wife“

    WIFE… you homophobic goofball!

    this is what you said, moron.

    If you tried to take away my right to be married to my wife, I would KILL you dead.

    And that is what you losers did.

    so we took away your ‘right’ to marry your wife…sounds like you’re either a male top, or a lesbian.

    do you even comprehend the drivel you write??? duhhhhhhhh

    and anytime someone starts talking about MURDER…its a threat.

  65. #365
    On November 14th, 2008 at 7:38 pm, right4life said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:41 pm, happy2behere said:
    SOCAL says that the violent homsexual protestors (the reason for this thread) are not representative of homsexuals as a whole. OK. So therefore one can say that Bill Wallcott (whoever he is) is not represesntative of all Christians?

    Please read what I posted about this…SOCAL LIED…this man is a christian, a former homosexual…who was charged with a HATE CRIME in canada because he preached that homosexuality is sin….

    the same commission that ruled he was guilty of a hate crime, ACQUITED a band that had a song with the lyrics about KILLING CHRISTIANS…so he changed it to killing homosexuals to highlight the hypocrisy of the canadian ‘civil rights’ commission.

    Socal had to lie to make a point, because he/she/it cannot do so any other way.

  66. #366
    On November 14th, 2008 at 7:40 pm, AniMEL said:

    Whether I’m important to you or not, SoCal, I cannot believe you actually said you’d kill over this thing. I get along just fine with everyone here, and I’m gay. You can, in fact, have a perfectly civil discussion with these people. Accuse them of hate and of course they’re gonna get defensive! I wanna see illegals deported, and for that stance I’m called a racist–same principal, that pisses me off much the same way. Get your head outta your @$$. And I really don’t give a damn how important I’m NOT to you, keep that crap up and I will dog the gay community’s every step until they reel it in. I can be worse for you guys than any of the “religious nuts” you’re taunting here.

    Stan W–just because kids are going to be bullied doesn’t make it okay, and I never suggested a Supreme Court ruling on the matter. Don’t put words in my mouth. I was responding to belittling comments made about something that really is a serious problem, nothing more. Are you always this grumpy?

    Joy, thank you for being civil.

  67. #367
    On November 14th, 2008 at 8:16 pm, SoCal said:

    Whether I’m important to you or not, SoCal, I cannot believe you actually said you’d kill over this thing.

    Okay AniMEL.. I will speak slowly, and add more words to make my point, because it is obvious either you didn’t read it, or understand it, or are just obtuse.

    I SAID… I am a male, I am very much in love with my wife and my child. If you in ANY way tried to destroy my marriage I would kill you dead. I would crush your head with a stone and be glad you were dead. NO ONE will get between me and my family, no one. Any man that would do less is not a man.

    That now said, I hope we are on the same page and that you agree with me.

    My POINT, which you as a wonderful gay American SHOULD appreciate, was that the gays were getting married LEAGLLY in California just two weeks ago and now their joy of marriage is challenged by some dumb law by a bunch of religious nuts.

    They may not agree with my words about them and their religion, which I think have some very good qualities…, but you and they sure better understand how I feel about my wife and ANY attempt to separate us or make our marriage void.

    I did not in ANY way say that I was going to go running around killing ANYBODY… But why can’t the religious folk understand how gays feel about their marriage or plans of marriage being cancelled?

    Okay, you gays can’t get married now, which I think is a shame, and I was simply trying to make the point…can’t you cut homosexuals and their anger some slack???

  68. #368
    On November 14th, 2008 at 8:23 pm, SoCal said:

    You can, in fact, have a perfectly civil discussion with these people. Accuse them of hate and of course they’re gonna get defensive!

    And about that, I don’t give a crap. Making religious nuts angry is no concern of mine, and is actually very cathartic.

    Decent religious people of all creeds, as always, have all my respect.

  69. #369
    On November 14th, 2008 at 9:28 pm, SoCal said:

    right2Bstupid said:

    Please read what I posted about this…SOCAL LIED

    The LIES of SIMON PETER, the first diciple and the first Pope of Rome.

    Now Peter sat outside, in the palace; and a damsel came unto him, saying, `Thou also wast with Jesus of Galilee.’ But he LIED before them all, saying, `I know not what thou sayest.’ And when he was gone out into the porch, another maid saw him, and said unto them that were there, `This fellow was also with Jesus of Nazareth.’ And again he LIED with an oath, `I do not know the man.’ And after a while came unto him they that stood by, and said to Peter, `Surely thou also art one of them, for thy speech betrayeth thee.’ Then began he to curse and to LIE, saying, `I know not the man.’ And immediately the cock crew. And Peter remembered the word of Jesus, which said unto him, `Before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice.’ And he went out, and wept bitterly.” - Mt.26:69-75

    Hmmmm…

  70. #370
    On November 14th, 2008 at 10:53 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 7:40 pm, AniMEL said:

    Stan W–just because kids are going to be bullied doesn’t make it okay, and I never suggested a Supreme Court ruling on the matter. Don’t put words in my mouth. I was responding to belittling comments made about something that really is a serious problem, nothing more. Are you always this grumpy?

    And I was making sure you were aware that if a person in school is not bullied for being gay, they are bullied for having red hair or a strange last name, or any number of things.

    In other words, KIDS IN SCHOOL GET BULLIED. Yet all that concerns you are the ones that get bullied for being gay. Boo-Hoo-Hoo. You want special compassion for them and want them protected?

    Kids getting bullied for being gay is not a serious problem, as I and others pointed out to you. The only serious problem here is assigning extra sympathy or protection to a select group of people. Being Bullied in School is a terrible thing, no matter why it is done.

    Are you always that condescending and sexist?

  71. #371
    On November 14th, 2008 at 10:59 pm, garydt said:

    The guys like So Cal , OMU seem to have no fear what they say against the Lord. On Judgement Day they won’t say a word and they will shrink back and contemplate all the warnings they had about getting right and saved. Isaiah was right when he said in the last days that they will call evil good and good evil. I could go on but as it has been posted before it isn’t the Chrisitains throwing folks to hell but those who purposely reject God will end up their by ignoring His plan of Salvation.

  72. #372
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:12 pm, right4life said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 9:28 pm, SoCal said:

    uh so you compare yourself to Peter at his most shameful moment.

    you should be ashamed. but you’re not man enough to apologize and own up to it, like Peter was.

    you’re trash.

  73. #373
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:14 pm, right4life said:

    I SAID… I am a male, I am very much in love with my wife and my child.

    well since you’re such a macho man, and SOOOOO supportive of the gay lifestyle…if you have a son, why don’t you contact the local NAMBLA chapter for babysitting??

    I’m sure they’d be more than happy to help!!

  74. #374
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:23 pm, right4life said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 10:59 pm, garydt said:
    The guys like So Cal , OMU seem to have no fear what they say against the Lord.

    they have no idea whose they are…but they will someday…to their horror

    never get between a fool and the fire.

  75. #375
    On November 15th, 2008 at 1:17 am, Joy said:

    well since you’re such a macho man, and SOOOOO supportive of the gay lifestyle…if you have a son, why don’t you contact the local NAMBLA chapter for babysitting??

    This is partly what I’m talking about. Preaching a false Christ. I wouldn’t blame anyone for rejecting the Jesus preached by a foul-mouthed, hypocrite.

    right4life – With comments like that, you’re the one who should feel shame. You’re the one who is supposed to know better. How can any Christian of any stripe show so much glee at the notion that you think someone will burn in hell for all eternity?

    You need to take a long, long look in the mirror and into your own soul.

  76. #376
    On November 15th, 2008 at 1:21 am, Joy said:

    right4life – Maybe you need to remember that you’re talking to people that God loves.

    Your comments in this thread are the most despicable simply because you claim to know Christ and claim to know of His love. How can you and say the things you do?

  77. #377
    On November 15th, 2008 at 1:34 am, mistressjustice said:
  78. #378
    On November 15th, 2008 at 2:16 am, Politicalguano said:

    Fact#1 Homosexuals disrupting any church service iof any faith s desecration and we are sick of such behavior. If you homosexuals are unhappy with the ballot choices Christians make – tough! You have no right to disrupt our lives and our religious services based on how you think we voted in secrecy. I encourage anyone targeted by homosexuals for voting in this year’s election to file criminal complaints re: voter intimidation.
    Fact#2 We don’t like your anti-Christian comments and rhetoric. If you expect to be spoken to in a decent and polite manner, then shut your damned mouth about our religion. If you are going to say the most inflammatory and hurtful comments about our faith, expect to be treated as an enemy. I personally oppose every GLBT initiative simply to frustrate homosexuals as I am sick of your slander directed against us.
    Fact#3 Despite your perverted lifestyle and your disgraceful rhetoric about our religion, we will still fight to defend your safety and life as well as your privacy. We still see you as fellow Americans – your actions make me think you do not see us in the sane light. i recommend changing your behavior towards us lest we see you as a threat to our freedom and liberty – you do so at your own peril!
    Fact #4 I have never mistreated any gay person. I have raised my children to treat all people politely. Dare to harm or threaten the safety of my family and you will regret it as soon as i find you.

  79. #379
    On November 15th, 2008 at 6:08 am, conservative in europe said:

    Huggybear said

    Oh my. You are revealing far more about yourself than I think you realize. I don’t know many people — gay, straight, or otherwise — who actually believe they have chosen their own sexual preference. Do you have something you would like to share with the class?

    Is that supposed to make me uncomfortable?

    Huggy, you make my point exactly. You are uncomfortable with your own lifestyle so you try and project it on others to make yourself feel normal.

    What it really comes down to is that I made a statement based on FACTS that disagree with your supposition. Thus, your only argument is to call me gay.

    Grow up.

  80. #380
    On November 15th, 2008 at 10:23 am, AniMEL said:

    SoCal–no, I cannot cut them some “slack.” Anger is one thing, but taking it out in this fashion? No way. Unacceptable. If you’re a straight guy, fantastic–but please, don’t act as though you really understand it. You don’t understand their side any more than you understand mine. If my fellow gays and lesbians want to change things, they need to start using their heads instead of trying to stir things up and deliberately making other people angry. They’re sabotaging all of us.

    StanW–again, you’re putting words in my mouth. When, exactly, did I say that being bullied for being gay was any worse than any of those other things? I got bullied for other things, too, trust me. I got bullied for not having the cool clothes and cool shoes. I got laughed at because I liked to read. NEVER, at ANY POINT, did I suggest being bullied for being gay required a protected class. You’re beatin’ a dead horse here, dude. I have to ask, though, when was the last time you heard of a kid being beaten unconscious for having red hair? A 14-year-old who is taught in my friends’ music class was beaten severely because he was too “girly” (among a litany of anti-gay slurs). No, I don’t believe in hate crimes legislation, so don’t go there. But contrary to what you think, it is a problem. All bullying should be harshly dealt with, but I don’t think you understand just how violent some kids can get when another kid is just too different for them.

    Joy–again, I have to agree with you.

  81. #381
    On November 15th, 2008 at 11:08 am, Oh-nO said:

    We do not wrestle against flesh and blood but against principalities of evil and darkness. Love the sinner, hate the sin. Legislate all you want in favor of the homosexual lifestyle, as a commited believer I will fight against it. Not against the person but the principle. There is a reason that homosexuality was a stonable offense in the old testement and still is an abomination in the new. Jesus never spoke directly to the issue, but the words “go and sin no more” carry the weight of eternity. It is our choice, to accept God’s provision in Christ’s sacrifice or reject it. Keep in mind that anything which exalts itself above the Word of God is pure evil.

    I didn’t make the rules, I just play by the rules. I don’t want to be disqualified.

  82. #382
    On November 15th, 2008 at 12:03 pm, right4life said:

    This is partly what I’m talking about. Preaching a false Christ. I wouldn’t blame anyone for rejecting the Jesus preached by a foul-mouthed, hypocrite.

    you accuse me of preaching a false christ?? who do you think you are?? hmmm?? you should take the log out of your own eye, before you take the spec out of mine ‘honey’ :roll: you sanctimonious holier-than-thou hypocrite.

    you’re a mormon, correct? well all your ‘love’ and your ‘concern’ is based upon a lie. so you can tell someone you ‘care’ but if you don’t tell them the truth, then all your ‘concern’ is just hypocritcal possturing to make yourself feel good.

    and if you are a mormon, then YOU are the one who preaches a false christ.

    right4life – With comments like that, you’re the one who should feel shame. You’re the one who is supposed to know better. How can any Christian of any stripe show so much glee at the notion that you think someone will burn in hell for all eternity?

    you prove you’re a liar, your judgement is false about me. but so nice to put yourself in place of God as my judge.

    As far as the comment about NAMBLA, it makes a very good point, how far do you take this support of the gay lifestyle? hmmmm?? after all NAMBLA is just another ‘alternative lifestyle’ right?? :roll: and who is to say what the age of consent is?? hmmmm??

    you really are a piece of work there joy-less. :roll:

  83. #383
    On November 15th, 2008 at 12:06 pm, right4life said:

    On November 15th, 2008 at 1:21 am, Joy said:
    right4life – Maybe you need to remember that you’re talking to people that God loves.

    oh and joy-less :roll: my comment about the fool and fire is true…ever hear of casting pearls before swine??

    apparently thats what I am doing with you…. :roll:

  84. #384
    On November 15th, 2008 at 12:24 pm, AniMEL said:

    Right4life, what qualifies you to pass judgment on another person’s soul? Are you God? Do you know what her relationship with the Lord is like? I daresay not, now you’re just picking fights. Chill, dude.

  85. #385
    On November 15th, 2008 at 12:36 pm, right4life said:

    Right4life, what qualifies you to pass judgment on another person’s soul? Are you God?

    why don’t you point out where I did that hmmm??

    Do you know what her relationship with the Lord is like?

    no, but apparently she knows mine, why aren’t you complaining to her?

    and if she is a mormon, then yes, she is preaching a false christ. the jesus of the mormons is NOT the Jesus of the Bible.

  86. #386
    On November 15th, 2008 at 1:35 pm, Joy said:

    Well, first off, our Jesus is indeed the Jesus of the Bible.

    Have you ever read, ‘Ye shall know them by their fruits?’ It is you who are passing a final judgement on SoCal and Omu. I didn’t say one thing about your final destination.

    looks like socal is a lying piece of trash.

    you’re a typical gay activist..a hate-filled lying nut-case.

    you are a sick EVIL deranged piece of sh**

    not nearly as deranged vicious SICK and evil as you gay scum are. you’ve just proven it ‘honey’

    racist piece of sh**

    so we took away your ‘right’ to marry your wife…sounds like you’re either a male top, or a lesbian.

    you’re trash.

    well since you’re such a macho man, and SOOOOO supportive of the gay lifestyle…if you have a son, why don’t you contact the local NAMBLA chapter for babysitting??

    Some fruit… The Jesus of the Bible is the One who died for all. The one who carried out His Father’s plan. The One who is the Christ, the Son of the Living God.

    If you think the Jesus of the Bible would appreciate your quotes while you’re supposedly sharing the Gospel, which means Good News, btw… you’re sadly mistaken. It’s one thing to recognize sin, and point it out. But it should always be done in a loving way.

    And the reason it’s worse that you are saying these things, is because you claim to be one of His followers.

    I haven’t pronounced anything on your soul. But you certainly have with Omu and SoCal. We make judgements every day. But we cannot possibly pass a final judgement on anyone. Do you really think the way to convert them is through the method you are using? I know of no one ever who was converted through hate-filled words.

    The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints believes Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God. He is the one who died for us and took our sins upon Him, both the punishment and the guilt. He raised from the dead and sits at the right hand of the Father. He makes intercession for us. He is the great Redeemer, The Prince of Peace and many more glorious things.

    He, and only He can see into a person’s heart. Which is why I only point out the fruit of your mouth. Out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaks. Your own words show what’s in your heart.

    All I am trying to do is help you see that you will convert no one with those ugly words. In fact you send them further away. How will you account for that?

    It is my hope you’ll take some time to ponder what being a child of God really means, and how you should act as a child of God.

    WE all fall short, but we must keep trying.

  87. #387
    On November 15th, 2008 at 2:12 pm, right4life said:

    Have you ever read, ‘Ye shall know them by their fruits?’ It is you who are passing a final judgement on SoCal and Omu. I didn’t say one thing about your final destination.

    you are a liar. you said I was preaching a ‘false christ’ therefore I am damned. I didn’t say one thing about their ‘final judgment’ you cannot point to it. you are a liar…what does that say about your fruits hmmmmmm???

    If you think the Jesus of the Bible would appreciate your quotes while you’re supposedly sharing the Gospel,

    get a clue ‘honey’ I wasn’t ‘sharing the gospel’ with these clowns…there is no reason to cast pearls before swine. :roll:

    I haven’t pronounced anything on your soul. But you certainly have with Omu and SoCal.

    again, you are a liar. please post those judgements that I have rendered. go ahead it should be interesting.

    Do you really think the way to convert them is through the method you are using?

    sigh…again I was not trying to ‘convert’ them, because I know better than to try to ‘convert’ anyone on a messageboard :roll: it truly is casting pearls before swine.

    The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints believes Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God

    the mormons preach a FALSE CHRIST. the JESUS of the Bible is God Almighty, creator of heaven and earth….you will never be a ‘god’ for as Isaiah 43:10 says ‘before Me there were no gods formed and there will be none after’

    your jesus is not the Eternal God of the universe. the Jesus of the Bible IS.

    I hope you will turn from a false piety, and form of godliness…and renouncce the false christ of mormonism, and embrace the true Jesus of the Bible.

  88. #388
    On November 15th, 2008 at 2:14 pm, right4life said:

    oh and yes socal and OMU ARE trash. truth is truth.

    those things I said are true…and you cannot even address the truth of what I said about NAMBLA and the slippery slope that is the gay agenda :roll:

  89. #389
    On November 15th, 2008 at 3:02 pm, AniMEL said:

    Right4life, she wasn’t judging the condition of your soul or of your theology, she was making remarks on the things you say and the tone you use. It is quite difficult to take you seriously as a Christian when you’re so rude all the time. I used to be the same way, man, and it took a long time to realize just how off-putting that was.

    Don’t shove the NAMBLA thing in my face. You’re talking about an organization that believes that romantic, sexual relationships with young boys is perfectly normal, something the gay community does not foster. NAMBLA is shunned even by the gays and lesbians who hate me for my conservative views. Some of your arguments are quite valid; this one, however, is not. Much like SoCal and Omu, you’re giving the impression of merely trying to insult people.

  90. #390
    On November 15th, 2008 at 3:03 pm, mistressjustice said:

    Contridiction follows contridiction. And your mind-reading abilities stink.

    There were no contrAdictions. Your reading comprehension abilities suck. I’m starting to see why.

    “I’m right and anyone who think differnet is a stupid hate-filled Christian bigot.”

    Actually, I just have opinions, and never called anyone a hate-filled bigot, weak-minded yes. You people have a history of suppressing the freedoms of others based on a belief in your book. Of course your book of fairy tales justifies slavery and treating women as inferior to men. You don’t understand your reason for living, so your little book, which is filled with negativity and oppression provides a crutch. Society has dropped many of the ugly aspects in the bible over the years. A few still remain. You’re not hateful as far as I know. You’re weak. Props to the christians past and present, who have tried to use the bible as a source of good, and fought against those who use it to divide and condemn. These people have at least tried to use the good lettuce.

    Gay should be allowed to do anything they want.

    Wrong.

    If the people don’t vote the way you think they should, then the vote should be overturned by the courts.

    Wrong. On this particular issue, I think the Court will eventually rule in favor of allowing gay marriage with an Equal Protection analysis similar to Loving. Gays aren’t a protected class, yet.

    Christians have no right whatsoever to oppose gays because that would be mean.

    Wrong. You folks can lawfully oppose whatever the hell you want. It’s part of what drives you. People like me have the right to call you weak-minded, and full of hypocrisy. We also have the right to boycott, protest, lobby, litigate, and vote. Gays don’t have tthe right to break the law without dealing with the ramifications legal, or psychological perception wise.

    An individual state does not have the right to set it’s own laws if the law they pass offends you.

    Wrong. An individual state has no right to set a law that violates the United States constitution. Loving, and thousands of other decisions say the same thing. SCOTUS will eventually rule in favor of gays on this issue as society evolves. If not strict scrutiny, perhaps they’ll use intermediate scrutiny with similar results in favor of the oppressed party.

    Changing a generations-old definition of marriage will have no effect on marriage, society, or religion.

    Ahh. At least now you’re thinking. Yes there will be an effect. There will be a positive effect. Thank goodness for the courts.

    Did I miss any?

    I’ve helped you out here, but you’re not working with a full deck. If you respond, I’m sure it will be filled with your typical strawman rants, false accusations and phony outrage. My points here are very clear. You’ll miss it, either because you’re slow, dishonest, or both.

  91. #391
    On November 15th, 2008 at 3:08 pm, Joy said:

    So Peter’s answer to Jesus is wrong? The one to which Jesus replied, “blessed art thou Simon Bar-jona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, by my Father which is in heaven.”

    Interesting.

    Me: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints believes Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God. He is the one who died for us and took our sins upon Him, both the punishment and the guilt. He raised from the dead and sits at the right hand of the Father. He makes intercession for us. He is the great Redeemer, The Prince of Peace and many more glorious things.

    Please tell me which of the above is incorrect. And also please note where I said He isn’t what you said He is.

    Also, please point to the quote of mine where I said you were damned.

    Jesus said to love our enemies, bless them who curse you, and do good to them that hate you. That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven.

    We can stand for truth without being mean, hateful and ugly toward those who we disagree.

  92. #392
    On November 15th, 2008 at 3:20 pm, right4life said:

    Right4life, she wasn’t judging the condition of your soul or of your theology, she was making remarks on the things you say and the tone you use.

    she accused me of preaching a false christ…which is tantamount to saying I’m damned. don’t know how else to put it.

    It is quite difficult to take you seriously as a Christian when you’re so rude all the time. I used to be the same way, man, and it took a long time to realize just how off-putting that was

    sorry I’m just not holy enough for you!!

    Don’t shove the NAMBLA thing in my face. You’re talking about an organization that believes that romantic, sexual relationships with young boys is perfectly normal, something the gay community does not foster.

    actually I was making a point about the slippery slope, which you or joy cannot seem to address. if homosexuality is just a ‘lifestyle choice’ then why is pedophilia not? anything that can be said to justify the normalacy of homosexuality can be said for pedophilia. who decides what the age of consent is? and we both know the pedophilia movement is where the homosexual movement was 40 years ago.

    Much like SoCal and Omu, you’re giving the impression of merely trying to insult people.

    yeah sometimes I do. I never claimed to be holier than thou…

  93. #393
    On November 15th, 2008 at 3:30 pm, Joy said:

    MJ – You may be interested to know that the Latter-day Saints have always been against slavery. Our first Prophet of this dispensation prophesied about the civil war on December 25, 1832. He even gave specifics about it starting with rebellion in North Carolina.

    One of the main reasons for our expulsion from Missouri was our stance against slavery.

    Also of note, Utah granted women the right to vote in 1869 when still a territory. Although it was revoked by Congress in 1887. It was restored in 1895 when the Utah constitution was written for the new State. It passed with no dissent the first time in 1869 and didn’t take woman’s suffrage to get it.

    Just thought you might find these facts interesting.

  94. #394
    On November 15th, 2008 at 3:35 pm, Joy said:

    right4life – shouldn’t assume things. Some people preach a false Christ out of ignorance. Some know better and do it anyway.

    So your excuse is that you don’t claim to be holier than thou. Whatever you have to tell yourself to excuse your abominable behavior.

    Ye shall know them by their fruit…

  95. #395
    On November 15th, 2008 at 3:38 pm, Joy said:

    Also right4life, Why would anyone debate political issues with you when all you do is hurl invective and get nasty?

    Making the NAMBLA comments in the way you did, was not arguing a slippery slope, it was vicious and ugly.

  96. #396
    On November 15th, 2008 at 3:45 pm, right4life said:

    Please tell me which of the above is incorrect. And also please note where I said He isn’t what you said He is.

    let see…do you believe this:

    God himself was once as we are now, and is an exalted man, and sits enthroned in yonder heavens!!! . . . We have imagined that God was God from all eternity. I will refute that idea and take away the veil, so that you may see” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 345

    how about this:

    The trinity is three separate Gods: The Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. “That these three are separate individuals, physically distinct from each other, is demonstrated by the accepted records of divine dealings with man.” (Articles of Faith, by James Talmage, p. 35.)

    do you believe Jesus was created by the Father?

    and do you believe the following:

    James Talmage, a very important Mormon figure who said, “The sectarian dogma of justification by faith alone has exercised an influence for evil,” (Articles, p. 432), and “Hence the justice of the scriptural doctrine that salvation comes to the individual only through obedience,” (Articles, p. 81).

    so you believe you need works in addition to what Jesus did. clearly the mormons do not believe in the Jesus of the Bible.

    Also, please point to the quote of mine where I said you were damned.

    you said I was preachng a false christ…therefore I am damned..no??

    and you claimed that I damned these people..

    I haven’t pronounced anything on your soul. But you certainly have with Omu and SoCal. We make judgements every day.

    but you cannot show me where I did this.

    After you become a good Mormon, you have the potential of becoming a god, (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, pages 345-347, 354.)

    do you think you can become a god?

    Clearly mormonism is NOT christian, and preach a different gospel, and another savior…not the Jesus, who is God Almighty…the ETERNAL uncreated God of the universe.

  97. #397
    On November 15th, 2008 at 3:46 pm, right4life said:

    On November 15th, 2008 at 3:35 pm, Joy said:
    right4life – shouldn’t assume things. Some people preach a false Christ out of ignorance. Some know better and do it anyway.

    so joy, as I have established above, why do you preach a false christ?

  98. #398
    On November 15th, 2008 at 3:48 pm, right4life said:

    Making the NAMBLA comments in the way you did, was not arguing a slippery slope, it was vicious and ugly.

    so mentioning NAMBLA is vicious and ugly..but NAMBLA themselves are not, right? the point I made was valid..what is the limit of the gay agenda? and how far will it go?

    NAMBLA EXISTS…sorry deal with it. please name a heterosexual equivalent…you cannot. and please explain to me why homosexuality IS a valid alternative lifestyle, and pedophilia IS NOT.

  99. #399
    On November 15th, 2008 at 3:49 pm, right4life said:

    Ye shall know them by their fruit…

    and the devil comes as an angel of light…

  100. #400
    On November 15th, 2008 at 4:08 pm, mistressjustice said:

    MJ – You may be interested to know that the Latter-day Saints have always been against slavery. Our first Prophet of this dispensation prophesied about the civil war on December 25, 1832. He even gave specifics about it starting with rebellion in North Carolina.

    One of the main reasons for our expulsion from Missouri was our stance against slavery.

    Yes. I have Mormon friends, and that is impressive. However, this:

    Brigham Young, who led many of the Mormons to Salt Lake City, UT wrote:

    Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African Race? If the White man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so.

    Cain slew his brother. . . and the Lord put a mark upon him, which is the flat nose and black skin.

    You see some classes of the human family that are black, uncouth, uncomely, disagreeable and low in their habits, wild, and seemingly deprived of nearly all the blessings of the intelligence that is generally bestowed upon mankind. The first man that committed the odious crime of killing one of his brethren will be cursed the longest of any one of the children of Adam. Cain slew his brother. Cain might have been killed, and that would have put a termination to that line of human beings. This was not to be, and the Lord put a mark upon him, which is the flat nose and black skin. Trace mankind down to after the flood, and then another curse is pronounced upon the same race–that they should be the ‘servant of servants;’ and they will be, until that curse is removed.” 1

    Joseph Fielding Smith — not to be confused with Joseph Smith, the founder of the church — was the sixth President of the LDS church. He wrote:

    “There is a reason why one man is born black and with other disadvantages, while another is born white with great advantages. The reason is that we once had an estate before we came here, and were obedient, more or less, to the laws that were given us there. Those who were faithful in all things there received greater blessings here, and those who were not faithful received less.” 2,3

    has always bothered me. I know you can find an equivlalent with other leaders, but it’s still disappointing to say the least. Moreover, blacks couldn’t achieve the highest priesthood in the Mormon church until as late as frickin 1978. I believe the change was made purely because of shame and political pressure.

    I know there are Black Mormons, including the great Gladys Knight, but your book still provides a basis for racial discrimination. Of course, it’s not acceptable to push those elements like B. Young used to, because society has evolved. Thank Gawd.

    We have no love for each other, but I see you fighting the good fight on these boards, and taking on both sides of the political line. I respect that.
    Oh well.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Supreme Court blocks Prop. 8 show trial plan

January 11, 2010 11:31 AM by Michelle Malkin

34 Comments

The anti-Prop. 8 mob strikes again

January 7, 2010 12:51 PM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments

Climate of hate: More threats from the gay marriage mob

November 10, 2009 05:24 PM by Michelle Malkin

49 Comments

Left-wing thug of the day

November 5, 2009 01:18 PM by Michelle Malkin

78 Comments

Maine votes down gay marriage

November 4, 2009 01:25 AM by Michelle Malkin

759 Comments


Categories: Proposition 8

Redstate

» Media Matters
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook