Who will quell the anti-Prop. 8 rage?

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 13, 2008 02:28 PM

Pssst. Hey, “Lightworker.” Yeah, you, “Mr. Soul-fixer.” Bearer of “Hope and Change.”

Across the country, there are broken souls in need of fixing. They are the opponents of Proposition 8, California’s traditional marriage initiative, which passed 52-48 (the same margin you won by, Lightworker).

Perhaps you would care to weigh in and work your healing magic on the anti-Prop. 8 rabble-rousers who continue to wreak havoc on Mormon churches in several cities and states and blacklisting peaceful voters who supported the ballot measure.

It is getting very ugly out there and no one in the Democratic leadership has stepped up to condemn the insane rage, to borrow a phrase.

Where art thou, Lightworker?

***

Sad:

The artistic director at California’s largest nonprofit musical theater company resigned Wednesday amid protests over his donation to a campaign to ban gay marriage in the state.

Scott Eckern stepped down from his job at the California Musical Theater in Sacramento after some gay activists called for a theater boycott.

He said he is leaving “after prayerful consideration to protect the organization and to help the healing in the local theatergoing and creative community.”

Eckern said he “chose to act upon my belief that the traditional definition of marriage should be preserved” but had no idea his contribution would generate such controversy. He said his sister is a lesbian in a domestic partnership, which he understands to carry the same legal rights as marriage.

The boycott calls — led by artists including “Hairspray” composer Marc Shaiman — began after activists learned Eckern contributed $1,000 to the Yes on 8 campaign.

***
Previous:

Anti-Prop. 8 mob: It’s over. You lost. Move on.


Schwarzenegger pours fuel on anti-Prop. 8 fire

Unhinged losers: Prop. 8 opponents threaten Mormons and Catholics

Who supported Prop. 8?

First graders take school field trip…to teacher’s gay wedding

Public school politicking and Proposition 8

Posted in: Proposition 8

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Left Of Center
  2. Tolerance in practice « DPGI - the aftermath
  3. Roseanne Barr - Repent You Black Bible Blabbers | BigMouthFrog
  4. GayPatriot » More Hate Against 8
  5. Update on Prop 8 Rebellion | RightSidePolitics.com
  6. The party of perpetual outrage « Right Minded Online
  7. H8 Against Prop 8 — ETC: Everyday Thoughts Collected
  8. ETC: Everyday Thoughts Collected
  9. David’s Blog of Common Sense » On California Prop. 8, and Gay Marriage, and the Constitution
  10. Gay Rage: Leftist “tolerance” in Action « Mark Epstein
  11. Gay Rage: So who gets the kids? « Mark Epstein
  12. OK Rep. Sally Kern speaks out about the CA Prop 8 and the homosexual political agenda. | Ft. Hard Knox
  13. OK Rep. Sally Kern speaks out about the CA Prop 8 and the homosexual political agenda. « Green Country Values
  14. Mormon Temples Domestic Terror Targets | Bucks Right
  15. Prop 8 Madness | The Daily Conservative
  16. There’s a Cost « The Pugnacious Irishman
  17. Michelle Malkin » Anti-Prop. 8 protest watch
  18. Prop 8 Madness | TDCMedia
  19. For the Glory of God « Riggword Weblog
  20. Vox
  21. Michelle Malkin » Anti-Prop. 8 Mob Watch: Christians in San Francisco’s Castro district
  22. The Weekly Claw 11-18-08 » VAJoe.com
  23. Undermining Constitutionalism in the Name of Fairness « Calvin Freiburger Online
  24. The Liberal Playbook: Gay Marriage « Calvin Freiburger Online

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #544351
    On November 14th, 2008 at 9:37 am, jt3151 said:

    I went to a gay “wedding”in Illinois 15 years ago- it is not recognized legally, but so what? Their friends and family all know that they are “married” and they are living their lives as a married couple. What’s the problem?

  2. #544361
    On November 14th, 2008 at 9:47 am, Cosmo said:

    “On November 13th, 2008 at 9:41 pm, Mookie said:”

    Stay on target, Mookie. Your veiled–and false–anti-Mormon attacks are not fact-based, and only serve to paint you as an anti-religious bigot. The official press release referring to your false charge is here.

    It is Chairman Michel’s intentional skewing of the facts in this case–and smearing of a Church who by-and-large has more in common with and more respect for Judaism than any other Christian sect–that is reprehensible.

    I politely ask you to retract your comment.

  3. #544388
    On November 14th, 2008 at 10:05 am, Cosmo said:

    Although they both field nine players on a diamond, the Cubs are not the same as the White Sox, and therefore are called by different names. They both play 162-game schedules. Both made the playoffs this season. Both lost in the first round. Both have rabid fan bases.

    Just as I would never offend the sensibilities of a Cub fan by calling him a White Sox fan, I would never offend the sensibilities of a traditional hetero couple by referring to two men committing to one another as marriage.

  4. #544416
    On November 14th, 2008 at 10:22 am, richflanj said:

    Dear “Antigayblacklist.com”:

    Please add my name to your website, you McCarthy-like SOB’s.

    Sincerely,

    Richard M. Flanary
    Georgia

  5. #544442
    On November 14th, 2008 at 10:35 am, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 10:22 am, richflanj said:
    Dear “Antigayblacklist.com”:

    Please add my name to your website, you McCarthy-like SOB’s.

    These people are not McCarthy like, as McCarthy was on a noble and righteous quest of ridding the government of security risks.

    What they are is the epitome of the hobgoblin they have created and dubbed “McCarthism”. It never existed except in their own feeble minds!

  6. #544465
    On November 14th, 2008 at 10:47 am, SoCal said:

    Please add my name to your website, you McCarthy-like SOB’s.

    I think it may take some McCarthy like seriousness to take back this nation…

  7. #544479
    On November 14th, 2008 at 10:53 am, happy2behere said:

    In the 50+ years I have been going to church, I can honestly say I have never met a Christian(s) who wants to oppress homosexuals, not one.

    Its the redefining of marraige that is the problem for many of “us Christians.” It opens up the churches to discrimination lawsuits that could force them to shut down. Based on the article above, I suspect that is their goal.

  8. #544490
    On November 14th, 2008 at 10:58 am, SoCal said:

    In the 50+ years I have been going to church, I can honestly say I have never met a Christian(s) who wants to oppress homosexuals, not one

    They just doom them all to hell…

  9. #544492
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:00 am, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 10:58 am, SoCal said:
    In the 50+ years I have been going to church, I can honestly say I have never met a Christian(s) who wants to oppress homosexuals, not one

    They just doom them all to hell…

    Christians do not have that ability, SoCal. if you have an issue with Homosexuality being a sin, you should take it up with the author of THE Book!

  10. #544501
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:06 am, Flag2911 said:

    Sorry Folks, Obama Light will stop all problems caused by Prop 8 by placing three new judges on the supreme court. The court will then make gay marriage the law of the land. Please do not be so impatient.

  11. #544507
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:07 am, right4life said:

    They just doom them all to hell…

    they doom themselves. anyone in hell has done it to themselves.

  12. #544517
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:14 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 10:58 am, SoCal said:


    They just doom them all to hell…

    No. The Bible teaches that anyone whose name is not written in the Book of Life will be thrown into the Lake of Fire. …and it won’t be Christians who do the throwing.

    How does one get their name recorded in the Book? There are many verses that talk about this, but they all say in essence to believe God about the fallen state of Man and to trust Him to be saved.

  13. #544530
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:24 am, jdsbc98 said:

    http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-steinberg12-2008jul12,0,4554282.story

    this article is pretty funny. It’s after the CA Sup.Ct. legalized gay marriage. The author says Prop 8 is doomed to fail and when it does fail, opponents of gay marriage will just have to “live with it.” May he should now take his own advice.

  14. #544561
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:41 am, Wildcatter1980 said:

    I am shocked and dismayed about this bad behavior.

    The old saying, “It takes one to know one.” comes to mind. The far left is always accusing conservatives in general and Republicans in particular of being thuggish in how they try to go about effecting change and implementing their policy positions. Some go so far as to say “Rethuglicans” they are so outraged.

    Could it be that these far left loons are the ones who cannot control their base urges and are employing this thuggish behavior?

    What is more disappointing though is the total lack of condemnation from Democrat political leaders in general and President-elect Barack Obama in particular. However, we probably should not be surprised as his record is one of not bucking his political base such as the far left loons.

  15. #544569
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:46 am, happy2behere said:

    Nor have I ever heard anyone “doom them all to hell.” Not ever.

    I am not shocked but quite worried that you buy into the stereotype that faith is a form of bigotry.

  16. #544584
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:55 am, AniMEL said:

    Omu is right about one thing: teenagers who are gay (or marked as possibly gay by other kids) are mercilessly tormented by their peers. I vehemently denied being gay when I was a kid, and I was tortured. By the time I got to jr. high school I had been called every anti-gay slur you can imagine and beaten up more times than I could remember. Then it only got worse.

    I’m not really bitter about the experience. It helped make me the person I am today. I’m not saying I’d go out for coffee with those people now, but I don’t hate them, either. Things haven’t changed much. Teachers may make a big to-do about a shirt that says “straight pride,” but that kid’s peers won’t beat the living daylights out of him. That can be more demoralizing than anybody realizes.

    I may not agree with a lot of Omu’s arguments, but I do agree with that one.

  17. #544599
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, SoCal said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:46 am, happy2behere said:

    I am not shocked but quite worried that you buy into the stereotype that faith is a form of bigotry.

    Maybe the problem is that you don’t understand what gays hear all the time from the conservative religious folk…

    By social conservative activist Bill Whatcott:

    Kill the Homosexual

    Kill The homosexual
    You are the one we despise
    Day in day out your words compromise lies
    I will love watching you die
    Soon it will be and by your own demise
    Buried in hypocrisy
    Lacerate your faith in sodomy
    Morally diseased
    On the cross of Calvary your body bashed defeated stabbed
    Blessing as you hate
    Loyal to your enemies
    Monetary faith
    As him you will pay for the lies of your prophecy
    God wants you dead
    Kill the homosexual, kill the homosexual
    Kill the homosexual, kill the homosexual
    Kill the homosexual, kill the homosexual, kill the homosexual
    Armies of darkness unite
    Destroy their bath houses and porn shops with fire
    Where in this world will you hide
    Sentenced to death, the anointment of Sodom
    In due time your path leads to me
    Put you out of your misery
    The death of prediction
    Kill the homosexual
    Kill the homosexual, dead!

  18. #544614
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:06 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, SoCal said:

    Maybe the problem is that you don’t understand what gays hear all the time from the conservative religious folk…

    By social conservative activist Bill Whatcott:

    Who is Bill Whatcott?

    And if the gays don’t like his ability to practice the 1st Amendment, TOUGH!

  19. #544626
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:11 pm, SoCal said:

    And if the gays don’t like his ability to practice the 1st Amendment, TOUGH!

    There ya go… the point is made.

    My job here is done.

    Hi Yo Silver, AWAY!

  20. #544634
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:16 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:55 am, AniMEL said:
    Omu is right about one thing: teenagers who are gay (or marked as possibly gay by other kids) are mercilessly tormented by their peers.

    So are kids they don’t like, kinds that dress differnetly, kids that speak differently, kids that don’t live in the same neighborhood as they do, kids that makes better grades than they do, kids that are worse at sports than they are…

    The list goes on. You want a Supreme Court decision making it a federal crime for kids to not get the widdle fweelings hurt while they are in school?

  21. #544658
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:26 pm, HeatherRadish said:

    Omu is right about one thing: teenagers who are gay (or marked as possibly gay by other kids) are mercilessly tormented by their peers.

    So are redheads, smart kids, kids wearing the wrong label on their pants, kids who don’t like football, stoner kids, straight-edge kids, Christian kids, pagan kids…

  22. #544688
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, right4life said:

    Maybe the problem is that you don’t understand what gays hear all the time from the conservative religious folk…

    we’re hearing from gay folks right now…and yes this type of hatred is what christians hear all the time from them.

  23. #544692
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:44 pm, right4life said:

    Who is Bill Whatcott?

    And if the gays don’t like his ability to practice the 1st Amendment, TOUGH!

    he’s a canadian. so he doesn’t have the first amendment.

    socal can always point to an individual nut, but they cannot point to anything comparable to the riots we see now from the ‘tolerant’ gay community, from christians.

  24. #544697
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:46 pm, right4life said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, SoCal said:

    oh and uh post your source please. interesting that you did not… :roll:

  25. #544708
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:49 pm, right4life said:

    oh I did a little research…

    None the less, Bill Whatcott does not want homosexuals to be killed. While Bill Whatcott posted the above song on this flyer (with some minor redactions to the original text) advocating murder and violence, he wants to be very clear this flyer SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED as an incitement to violence. In fact, Bill Whatcott would much prefer homosexuals repent of their sins and turn to Jesus Christ so they can inherit the Kingdom of Heaven. Bill Whatcott looks forward to spending the rest of eternity fellowshipping with millions of repentant and forgiven homosexuals in the loving presence of our risen Saviour and Lord Jesus Christ! “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.” John 3:16, 17. As for the picture of Pseudo Human Rights Chairwoman Lori Andreachuk, placed on the groin of a homosexual receiving oral sex? It should be interpreted as an insult, a unique method of ridicule and a display of utter contempt for her undeserved position of authority.

    To find out why Bill Whatcott redacted a terribly hateful song to make this seemingly hateful flyer and place Lori Andreachuk’s face where he did, go to http://www.freenorthamerica.ca, click on “board links,” click on “Gatherings and Activism.”

    looks like socal is a lying piece of trash.

  26. #544709
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:49 pm, right4life said:

    oops forgot the link:

    link

  27. #544710
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:51 pm, right4life said:

    So why would I now publish a flyer apparently calling for the death of homosexuals?

    Well check out this cute little song Alberta Human Rights bigot and sophist Lori Andreachuk ruled is not a hate crime and subject to no legal censure. Please keep in mind Lori Andeachuk recently fined a Christian Pastor, Rev Stephen Boisson, $7,000 and gagged him from speaking out on homosexuality for life, for saying the Bible teaches homosexuality is a sin and homosexual activism is detrimental to children. To read about Rev. Boisson’s “crime” and the punishment imposed on him go here: http://www.freenorthamerica.ca/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1385 . Anyways according to Andreachuk while non violently calling homosexuality a sin (historic Christian teaching) is illegal, calling for the violent murder of Christians is not:

    Here is a song which is available in Alberta music stores today published by a band called “Deicide.”

    Kill The Christian
    You are the one we despise
    Day in day out your words compromise lies
    I will love watching you die
    Soon it will be and by your own demise
    Buried in hypocrisy
    Lacerate your faith in God
    Morally diseased
    On the cross of Calvary your body bashed defeated stabbed
    Blessing as you hate
    Loyal to your enemies
    Monetary faith
    As him you will pay for the lies of your prophecy
    Satan wants you dead
    Kill the Christian, kill the Christian
    Kill the Christian, kill the Christian
    Kill the Christian, kill the Christian, kill the Christian
    Armies of darkness unite
    Destroy their temples and churches with fire
    Where in this world will you hide
    Sentenced to death, the anointment of Christ
    In due time your path leads to me
    Put you out of your misery
    The death of prediction
    Kill the Christian
    Kill the Christian, dead!

    you really are a piece of work socal.

  28. #544711
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:51 pm, SoCal said:

    looks like socal is a lying piece of trash.

    Yep, the evil name calling is what your kind of people do..

    Once again, you made my point!

    Hi Yo Silver!

  29. #544722
    On November 14th, 2008 at 12:54 pm, right4life said:

    Yep, the evil name calling is what your kind of people do..

    Once again, you made my point!

    Hi Yo Silver!

    in your dreams. I’ve just proven what a lying wacko you are.

  30. #544754
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:03 pm, right4life said:

    thanks socal for illustrating the lies and distortions that the gay movement is relies, and is built upon!

  31. #544782
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:15 pm, SoCal said:

    I’ve just proven what a lying wacko you are.

    Doesn’t your magical being in the sky supposedly say that you should not judge lest ye be judged, or something mystical like that? Yet you always seem to be spewing your judgement and hate where ever you go.

    Homosexuals are some of the kindest and best Americans we have, yet you evil people want to call them names and make their lives miserable.

    Some of the religious people I know are good and loving people, but you jihadists are just downright scary and dangerous.

  32. #544789
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:19 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:15 pm, SoCal said:
    Homosexuals are some of the kindest and best Americans we have, yet you evil people want to call them names and make their lives miserable.

    Were those “kindest and best Americans” you are talking about the ones that slapped the cross out of the old lady’s hand and stomped on it? Or maybe they were the ones parading down the street naked in public? Or perhaps you mean the ones that deliberatley disrupted a church service?

    So who is making who’s life miserable, SoCal?

  33. #544790
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:20 pm, right4life said:

    Doesn’t your magical being in the sky supposedly say that you should not judge lest ye be judged, or something mystical like that? Yet you always seem to be spewing your judgement and hate where ever you go.

    at least I don’t have to LIE and SMEAR people to make a point, like you do!!

    Homosexuals are some of the kindest and best Americans we have, yet you evil people want to call them names and make their lives miserable.

    when you can tell the truth, let me know.

    if you had any honor or decency at all you would apologize for smearing that man. but you don’t. you’re a typical gay activist..a hate-filled lying nut-case.

  34. #544800
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:24 pm, SoCal said:

    hate-filled lying nut-case.

    god is love… lol

  35. #544806
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:26 pm, right4life said:

    god is love… lol

    your god, and you, definately are not lol

  36. #544807
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:27 pm, SoCal said:

    Were those “kindest and best Americans” you are talking about the ones that slapped the cross out of the old lady’s hand and stomped on it?

    If you tried to take away my right to be married to my wife, I would KILL you dead.

    And that is what you losers did. Gay people could be married in California a week ago, and you religious nuts took that away.

    You are lucky they only slapped the cross out of that old bat’s hand. She is one STUPID religious nut.

  37. #544815
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:30 pm, right4life said:

    If you tried to take away my right to be married to my wife, I would KILL you dead.

    are you threatening me? I’d really like to see you try. :P

  38. #544817
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:31 pm, right4life said:

    If you tried to take away my right to be married to my wife, I would KILL you dead.

    And that is what you losers did.

    so you’re going to go out and kill people huh? I think MM should report you to the authorities.

    you are a sick EVIL deranged piece of sh**

  39. #544828
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:39 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:27 pm, SoCal said:
    If you tried to take away my right to be married to my wife, I would KILL you dead.

    And that is what you losers did. Gay people could be married in California a week ago, and you religious nuts took that away.

    You are lucky they only slapped the cross out of that old bat’s hand. She is one STUPID religious nut.

    BEHOLD! Liberal tolerance in action.

    Gays could NEVER be legally married, as marriage is between one man and one woman. And when asked to vote on the subject, the electorate of California REJECTED gay marriage.

    Nothing was taken away, as you cannot take away what you don’t have.

    So you condone the violence against your opponent, but whine about protest against those you support?

  40. #544843
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:49 pm, SoCal said:

    you are a sick EVIL deranged piece of sh**

    You religious nuts are one angry and vicious bunch aren’t you?

    Is “sh**” one of the holy words that comes up when you are speaking in tongues and rolling around on the floor with the snakes?

  41. #544851
    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:54 pm, nail49 said:

    You are lucky they only slapped the cross out of that old bat’s hand. She is one STUPID religious nut.

    What of the thugs who did the slapping? Are you condoning actions beyond their slapping the cross out of her hands?

    Another shining example of the tolerance of the left.

    Put the cross in a gay person’s hand and let it get slapped to the ground because he/she is a STUPID religious nut and where do you stand then?

    Do you even know the definition of hypocrisy?

  42. #544857
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:00 pm, SoCal said:

    Put the cross in a gay person’s hand and let it get slapped to the ground because he/she is a STUPID religious nut and where do you stand then?

    If an old gay lady showed up at a religious nut protest she probably wouldn’t have been holding a cross, she is probably more intelligent than that.

    But let us say that she did. Based on your comments here, she probably would have been tarred and feathered by you people.

  43. #544858
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:02 pm, right4life said:

    You religious nuts are one angry and vicious bunch aren’t you?

    not nearly as deranged vicious SICK and evil as you gay scum are. you’ve just proven it ‘honey’

    you gonna threaten me some more?

    you’d never say this to my face ‘honey’ and we both know it… :P

  44. #544861
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:02 pm, right4life said:

    you people

    racist piece of sh**

  45. #544873
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:07 pm, huggybear said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 3:04 am, conservative in europe said:

    What you do with your sexuality is a choice. Who you are attracted to sexually may be determined by physical and mental factors but how one acts upon those impulses is entirely a choice.

    Oh my. You are revealing far more about yourself than I think you realize. I don’t know many people — gay, straight, or otherwise — who actually believe they have chosen their own sexual preference. Do you have something you would like to share with the class?

  46. #544890
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:16 pm, Joy said:

    SoCal – Then you haven’t been reading. The majority of the religious folks here wouldn’t care if someone with a dissenting opinion showed up to a free speech rally at City Hall.

    And you won’t find a practicing Mormon anywhere who would either shut someone up or tar and feather them. We’d probably invite her to Family Home Evening though. Or maybe a Pot Luck at Church. Or to Sunday service.

  47. #544901
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:20 pm, Joy said:

    huggybear – I personally know many gay people who have told me they have chosen their lifestyle. The women because they hate men, and the men because “he knew he could indulge in lust with men that no woman would allow.”

    While some others claim they are born like that. It doesn’t matter. The point is, we all have control over how we respond to our inclinations or temptations.

  48. #544902
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:20 pm, SoCal said:

    And you won’t find a practicing Mormon anywhere who would either shut someone up or tar and feather them. We’d probably invite her to Family Home Evening though. Or maybe a Pot Luck at Church. Or to Sunday service.

    I really don’t mind religion. My mother was very religious and my sibling is a Christian Minister. I just get angry at all the hate some of the nuts spew.

    Most of the Mormons that I know are VERY good people, good Americans, and raise their children well.

    I guess the loud and angry, profanity spewing religious people responding on this blog don’t represent most good religious folk.

    I will take a break now.. gonna have some lunch.

  49. #544907
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:23 pm, Joy said:

    right4life – I understand tensions are running high. But you are really not doing your cause or your Savior any favors by adopting the ugly attitude.

    Why not leave that behavior to them?

  50. #544908
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:24 pm, Joy said:

    SoCal – Understood…

  51. #544916
    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:27 pm, right4life said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 2:23 pm, Joy said:
    right4life – I understand tensions are running high. But you are really not doing your cause or your Savior any favors by adopting the ugly attitude.

    so reacting to a threat is ugly, but I find it interesting that you have not comdemned socal for threatening to MURDER people.

    as far as I am concerned what I said is true. socal is a piece of sh**.

    and no I’m not sorry for it. and if they’re offended too bad. I’m offended by people calling for the murder of those they disagree with.

    and being nice isn’t going to convert someone like that. they are looking for people to bully.

  52. #544986
    On November 14th, 2008 at 3:18 pm, nail49 said:

    Based on your comments here, she probably would have been tarred and feathered by you people.

    SoCal, you and any other gay person are welcome in our church at any time. Unless you ACT UP you will NOT have anything slapped out of your hands, nor are you going to get tarred and feathered. You will be treated as any other sinner there (which would include ALL the church members) because we realize we are only human and have a sin nature — “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” Romans 3:23.

    Doesn’t your magical being in the sky supposedly say that you should not judge lest ye be judged, or something mystical like that?

    My God, who will NOT be mocked (not a threat on my part, but a promise on His part) is the only judge and we are not judging, merely stating what He has taught us to do — hate the sin, love the sinner.

    You might want to visit a real church some time — one that preaches God’s Word, not one that waters it down so as not to offend anyone — and also not one you make up in your fantasy world. Contrary to what you might believe, you won’t spontaneously burst into flames as you cross the threshhold!

  53. #545022
    On November 14th, 2008 at 3:46 pm, SoCal said:

    nail49 and Joy actually sound like they might be the kind of religious folk that I knew growing up and ARE worth having around… :o )

    The angry in your face people (that I love to poke at and expose) are another thing completely.

    SoCal, you and any other gay person are welcome in our church at any time.

    Thank you. I actually spent MANY years in a real church, and it was fun and fine until I asked as a young adult, “What happened to the souls of the millions of Jews killed by Hitler?” and I was told, “They are burning in hell.” …and, well, I decided that I didn’t want to be a member of that club anymore…..

    At least the Mormons, with their attempt to baptize the souls of the dead Jews, are TRYING to be loving and kind in their own way. The Christian minister just said, “Burning in hell.” and left it at that.

  54. #545042
    On November 14th, 2008 at 3:53 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 3:46 pm, SoCal said:
    The angry in your face people (that I love to poke at and expose) are another thing completely.

    Those are the gay activists whose viloence and extortion you are defending.

    Thank you. I actually spent MANY years in a real church, and it was fun and fine until I asked as a young adult, “What happened to the souls of the millions of Jews killed by Hitler?” and I was told, “They are burning in hell.” …and, well, I decided that I didn’t want to be a member of that club anymore…..

    At least the Mormons, with their attempt to baptize the souls of the dead Jews, are TRYING to be loving and kind in their own way. The Christian minister just said, “Burning in hell.” and left it at that.

    So the Mormons are welcome to believe that a dead person can be saved, but Christians are not allowed to believe that Jesus is “…the Way, the Truth, and the Light. No man comes to the Father except through…” Him?

    Again, you are a fine example of Liberals tolerance and acceptance.

  55. #545052
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:01 pm, right4life said:

    The angry in your face people (that I love to poke at and expose) are another thing completely.

    you mean gays like you who threaten to MURDER people :roll:

    the only thing you expose is your own hatred, intolerance, and idiocy.

  56. #545107
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:39 pm, SoCal said:
    right4life said:

    you mean gays like you who threaten to MURDER people :roll:

    Now I see the problem with your understanding of your bible..YOU CAN’T READ!

    I said, “If you tried to take away my right to be married to my wife

    WIFE… you homophobic goofball!

  57. #545110
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:41 pm, happy2behere said:

    SOCAL says that the violent homsexual protestors (the reason for this thread) are not representative of homsexuals as a whole. OK. So therefore one can say that Bill Wallcott (whoever he is) is not represesntative of all Christians?

    My point was that stereotyping faith as bigotry (especially by using the likes of Bill Wallcott) shows your flawed reasoning. If you have no faith and all you have is reason…

  58. #545114
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:44 pm, SoCal said:

    So the Mormons are welcome to believe that a dead person can be saved,

    Yes, they can believe what they want, and you can believe what you want, and if they want to sit in their church and pray for Jew’s souls, they can, but for any religious group to be sooooo sure about everything that they try to determine what others can do based on their belief system is just primitive and odd.

  59. #545117
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:45 pm, Joy said:

    Mormons believe people have a second chance after death, as Peter and Paul made mention of, to hear the True Gospel of Jesus Christ, not a distorted one, and accept.

    Our Heavenly Father loves all His children and the plan means to save as many as will accept. If someone never hears, or hears a twisted version and rejects that twisted version, or a child dies prior to the age of accountability, or many other reasons, they are not consigned to burn in hell for all eternity.

    That’s why we do the baptisms for the dead. If they accept on the other side, their ordinance work is done. It is also the link between the generations of mankind. Sealing us all as families in eternity.

    People that believe that seem to think Satan gets to make the rules and Heavenly Father had to scramble to come up with a plan B that only saves a small percent of His children.

    I happen to believe that God made the plan, Jesus executed it, and the vast majority of His children will be saved. God wins… not the Devil.

    Jesus died for ALL.

    It’s far more complex than can be typed in a blog in a couple of paragraphs.

  60. #545122
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:47 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:39 pm, SoCal said:

    Now I see the problem with your understanding of your bible..YOU CAN’T READ!

    On November 14th, 2008 at 1:27 pm, SoCal said:

    You are lucky they only slapped the cross out of that old bat’s hand. She is one STUPID religious nut.

    No we understand perfectly, SoCal. You will excuse anything and everthing gays do, yet use the same hatred and threats of violence of anyone that dares to disagree with your vaunted opinion.

    The gay community does not need your hatred and intolerance. It has plenty of its own!

  61. #545123
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:47 pm, Joy said:

    “People that believe only a small fraction of people get saved” is how the 4th paragraph should start.

  62. #545126
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:49 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:44 pm, SoCal said:
    Yes, they can believe what they want, and you can believe what you want, and if they want to sit in their church and pray for Jew’s souls, they can, but for any religious group to be sooooo sure about everything that they try to determine what others can do based on their belief system is just primitive and odd.

    I guess when it’s rolling around in your head, it must not sound so contridicting as it does when you type it.

    What a maroon!

  63. #545128
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:50 pm, SoCal said:

    OK. So therefore one can say that Bill Wallcott (whoever he is) is not represesntative of all Christians?

    I will agree, but wouldn’t you agree that a few posters on this site that claim to be Christians don’t act very Christain?

    I mean, most Christians I know or have known didn’t act all crazy and rude. They didn’t take themselves too seriously and understood that the world is large and opinions are going to vary based on experience and geographical local.

  64. #545130
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:52 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:47 pm, Joy said:
    “People that believe only a small fraction of people get saved” is how the 4th paragraph should start.

    Joy, I am not trying to turn this into a debate on the merits of the Mormon faith. My point was that SoCal is very selective in what he wants to allow religious organizations to believe. Mormons can beleive you can baptize the dead, but Christians are not allowed to believe the Jesus is the only way to be saved.

    Like I said, selective indignation.

  65. #545133
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:54 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:50 pm, SoCal said:
    OK. So therefore one can say that Bill I will agree, but wouldn’t you agree that a few posters on this site that claim to be Christians don’t act very Christain?

    I mean, most Christians I know or have known didn’t act all crazy and rude. They didn’t take themselves too seriously and understood that the world is large and opinions are going to vary based on experience and geographical local.

    Again, demanding tolerance and acceptance from others, yet offering none yourself. Sorry, SoCal, but when you go out of your wqay to act like a jerk to other people, deliberatly insulting them and their religion, don’t expect sunshine and rainbows in return!

  66. #545134
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:54 pm, SoCal said:

    No we understand perfectly, SoCal. You will excuse anything and everthing gays do, yet use the same hatred and threats of violence of anyone that dares to disagree with your vaunted opinion.

    MY vaulted opinion?

    lol… toooo funny.

  67. #545136
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:54 pm, happy2behere said:

    SOCAL is right. To force our religion down others’ throats is wrongheaded. But that is not what the voters of CAL have done with Prop. 8. All they have done is resisted the redefinition of marriage. Civil Unions give people all the legal rights they are entitled to. Redfining marriage threatens the entire existance of the church. And with all the violent protests how can Christians think otherwise?

  68. #545144
    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:58 pm, happy2behere said:

    Socal – missed your previous post. Yes, the nasties on this site get too riled up at times. It’s a shame Christians sometimes cant act like Christians. I have got to go now. Peace be with you.

  69. #545159
    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:09 pm, AniMEL said:

    SoCal, I try hard to stay away from personal attacks, but your ilk and your behavior have so incensed me that I’m not sure I care right now. I’m sick of the threats, I’m sick of the taunting, I’m sick of the hypocrisy. Grow the hell up.

    This is not worth getting your boxers in a wad over. It is not worth jail time. And the assertion that you would kill over this? You are insane. This sort of behavior makes us all look like idiots, and I refuse to claim your BS.

    Knock it off. Go home, cool off, and think about how you can rationally talk to people instead of beating them up with your freakin’ rhetoric! Take a page from Mahatma Ghandi’s book and KNOCK THIS S— OFF!!!

  70. #545161
    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:09 pm, SoCal said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:54 pm, happy2behere said:

    SOCAL is right. To force our religion down others’ throats is wrongheaded. But that is not what the voters of CAL have done with Prop. 8. All they have done is resisted the redefinition of marriage. Civil Unions give people all the legal rights they are entitled to. Redfining marriage threatens the entire existance of the church. And with all the violent protests how can Christians think otherwise?

    See, a reasonable person that makes sense.

    It is the loud in your face nuts that give religious groups a bad name. Like the gay nuts that ride in the parades sticking their business in everyone’s face.

    I don’t blame you or them for your beliefs. It is just when you castigate others for not holding same… or act like your’s don’t stink.

    It only takes a few bad apples on both sides of any issue to make everyone look bad.. How many Christian ministers or Catholic priests wander down the gay side from time to time?

    Jim Jones preached that many of his male followers were in denial about their homosexuality, conditioning those followers to accept him if he approached with a sexual advance.

    And he defused any accusations of sexual perversion on his part by claiming that he gained no personal pleasure from his acts, which he called a “great sacrifice.”

    I think the thing to do is just not throw rocks… we all have glass windows.

  71. #545167
    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:12 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:09 pm, SoCal said:

    I don’t blame you or them for your beliefs. It is just when you castigate others for not holding same… or act like your’s don’t stink.

    Which is exactly what you have been doing this entire thread, SoCal.

    So spare us the lectures and your holier-than-thou attitude.

    Like I said earlier, don’t come in here going out of your way to be a jerk to everyone and then tell us we need to be civil.

  72. #545170
    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:14 pm, SoCal said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:09 pm, AniMEL said:

    SoCal, I try hard to stay away from personal attacks, but your ilk and your behavior have so incensed me that I’m not sure I care right now. I’m sick of the threats, I’m sick of the taunting, I’m sick of the hypocrisy. Grow the hell up.

    You are too funny… get over yourself. You are not that important to the world, and not at all to me.

  73. #545174
    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:16 pm, SoCal said:

    So spare us the lectures and your holier-than-thou attitude.

    But you see, I think I am right, and you are wrong. My opinion is better than yours in MY opinion, and you think some great spirit has your back. When we die, we will meet and see who is right. Until then, get used to others not agreeing with you.

  74. #545176
    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:18 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:16 pm, SoCal said:

    But you see, I think I am right, and you are wrong. My opinion is better than yours in MY opinion, and you think some great spirit has your back. When we die, we will meet and see who is right. Until then, get used to others not agreeing with you.

    No, you think you are right, and that anyone that does not hold the same opinion as you is stupid and has no right to that opinion.

    And here’s some advise for you, my friend. If you are going to live your life as if there is no God, then you’d better be right!

    See you on the other side… briefly!

  75. #545180
    On November 14th, 2008 at 5:21 pm, SoCal said:

    Well, I would love to stick around and play, but I have to go now… good luck with your homophobia and all that!

    muah! :o )~

  76. #545288
    On November 14th, 2008 at 7:21 pm, Oh-nO said:

    That will not be the last of SoCal, a dog will return to its own vomit and a pig to the mud. He has heard the truth and refuses to listen. A homophobe is one who is afraid of homosexuals, he has it all mixed up. I fear no man, I fear God alone.

  77. #545298
    On November 14th, 2008 at 7:35 pm, right4life said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:39 pm, SoCal said:

    I said, “If you tried to take away my right to be married to my wife“

    WIFE… you homophobic goofball!

    this is what you said, moron.

    If you tried to take away my right to be married to my wife, I would KILL you dead.

    And that is what you losers did.

    so we took away your ‘right’ to marry your wife…sounds like you’re either a male top, or a lesbian.

    do you even comprehend the drivel you write??? duhhhhhhhh

    and anytime someone starts talking about MURDER…its a threat.

  78. #545300
    On November 14th, 2008 at 7:38 pm, right4life said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 4:41 pm, happy2behere said:
    SOCAL says that the violent homsexual protestors (the reason for this thread) are not representative of homsexuals as a whole. OK. So therefore one can say that Bill Wallcott (whoever he is) is not represesntative of all Christians?

    Please read what I posted about this…SOCAL LIED…this man is a christian, a former homosexual…who was charged with a HATE CRIME in canada because he preached that homosexuality is sin….

    the same commission that ruled he was guilty of a hate crime, ACQUITED a band that had a song with the lyrics about KILLING CHRISTIANS…so he changed it to killing homosexuals to highlight the hypocrisy of the canadian ‘civil rights’ commission.

    Socal had to lie to make a point, because he/she/it cannot do so any other way.

  79. #545304
    On November 14th, 2008 at 7:40 pm, AniMEL said:

    Whether I’m important to you or not, SoCal, I cannot believe you actually said you’d kill over this thing. I get along just fine with everyone here, and I’m gay. You can, in fact, have a perfectly civil discussion with these people. Accuse them of hate and of course they’re gonna get defensive! I wanna see illegals deported, and for that stance I’m called a racist–same principal, that pisses me off much the same way. Get your head outta your @$$. And I really don’t give a damn how important I’m NOT to you, keep that crap up and I will dog the gay community’s every step until they reel it in. I can be worse for you guys than any of the “religious nuts” you’re taunting here.

    Stan W–just because kids are going to be bullied doesn’t make it okay, and I never suggested a Supreme Court ruling on the matter. Don’t put words in my mouth. I was responding to belittling comments made about something that really is a serious problem, nothing more. Are you always this grumpy?

    Joy, thank you for being civil.

  80. #545332
    On November 14th, 2008 at 8:16 pm, SoCal said:

    Whether I’m important to you or not, SoCal, I cannot believe you actually said you’d kill over this thing.

    Okay AniMEL.. I will speak slowly, and add more words to make my point, because it is obvious either you didn’t read it, or understand it, or are just obtuse.

    I SAID… I am a male, I am very much in love with my wife and my child. If you in ANY way tried to destroy my marriage I would kill you dead. I would crush your head with a stone and be glad you were dead. NO ONE will get between me and my family, no one. Any man that would do less is not a man.

    That now said, I hope we are on the same page and that you agree with me.

    My POINT, which you as a wonderful gay American SHOULD appreciate, was that the gays were getting married LEAGLLY in California just two weeks ago and now their joy of marriage is challenged by some dumb law by a bunch of religious nuts.

    They may not agree with my words about them and their religion, which I think have some very good qualities…, but you and they sure better understand how I feel about my wife and ANY attempt to separate us or make our marriage void.

    I did not in ANY way say that I was going to go running around killing ANYBODY… But why can’t the religious folk understand how gays feel about their marriage or plans of marriage being cancelled?

    Okay, you gays can’t get married now, which I think is a shame, and I was simply trying to make the point…can’t you cut homosexuals and their anger some slack???

  81. #545342
    On November 14th, 2008 at 8:23 pm, SoCal said:

    You can, in fact, have a perfectly civil discussion with these people. Accuse them of hate and of course they’re gonna get defensive!

    And about that, I don’t give a crap. Making religious nuts angry is no concern of mine, and is actually very cathartic.

    Decent religious people of all creeds, as always, have all my respect.

  82. #545381
    On November 14th, 2008 at 9:28 pm, SoCal said:

    right2Bstupid said:

    Please read what I posted about this…SOCAL LIED

    The LIES of SIMON PETER, the first diciple and the first Pope of Rome.

    Now Peter sat outside, in the palace; and a damsel came unto him, saying, `Thou also wast with Jesus of Galilee.’ But he LIED before them all, saying, `I know not what thou sayest.’ And when he was gone out into the porch, another maid saw him, and said unto them that were there, `This fellow was also with Jesus of Nazareth.’ And again he LIED with an oath, `I do not know the man.’ And after a while came unto him they that stood by, and said to Peter, `Surely thou also art one of them, for thy speech betrayeth thee.’ Then began he to curse and to LIE, saying, `I know not the man.’ And immediately the cock crew. And Peter remembered the word of Jesus, which said unto him, `Before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice.’ And he went out, and wept bitterly.” - Mt.26:69-75

    Hmmmm…

  83. #545417
    On November 14th, 2008 at 10:53 pm, StanW said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 7:40 pm, AniMEL said:

    Stan W–just because kids are going to be bullied doesn’t make it okay, and I never suggested a Supreme Court ruling on the matter. Don’t put words in my mouth. I was responding to belittling comments made about something that really is a serious problem, nothing more. Are you always this grumpy?

    And I was making sure you were aware that if a person in school is not bullied for being gay, they are bullied for having red hair or a strange last name, or any number of things.

    In other words, KIDS IN SCHOOL GET BULLIED. Yet all that concerns you are the ones that get bullied for being gay. Boo-Hoo-Hoo. You want special compassion for them and want them protected?

    Kids getting bullied for being gay is not a serious problem, as I and others pointed out to you. The only serious problem here is assigning extra sympathy or protection to a select group of people. Being Bullied in School is a terrible thing, no matter why it is done.

    Are you always that condescending and sexist?

  84. #545420
    On November 14th, 2008 at 10:59 pm, garydt said:

    The guys like So Cal , OMU seem to have no fear what they say against the Lord. On Judgement Day they won’t say a word and they will shrink back and contemplate all the warnings they had about getting right and saved. Isaiah was right when he said in the last days that they will call evil good and good evil. I could go on but as it has been posted before it isn’t the Chrisitains throwing folks to hell but those who purposely reject God will end up their by ignoring His plan of Salvation.

  85. #545426
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:12 pm, right4life said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 9:28 pm, SoCal said:

    uh so you compare yourself to Peter at his most shameful moment.

    you should be ashamed. but you’re not man enough to apologize and own up to it, like Peter was.

    you’re trash.

  86. #545427
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:14 pm, right4life said:

    I SAID… I am a male, I am very much in love with my wife and my child.

    well since you’re such a macho man, and SOOOOO supportive of the gay lifestyle…if you have a son, why don’t you contact the local NAMBLA chapter for babysitting??

    I’m sure they’d be more than happy to help!!

  87. #545430
    On November 14th, 2008 at 11:23 pm, right4life said:

    On November 14th, 2008 at 10:59 pm, garydt said:
    The guys like So Cal , OMU seem to have no fear what they say against the Lord.

    they have no idea whose they are…but they will someday…to their horror

    never get between a fool and the fire.

  88. #545452
    On November 15th, 2008 at 1:17 am, Joy said:

    well since you’re such a macho man, and SOOOOO supportive of the gay lifestyle…if you have a son, why don’t you contact the local NAMBLA chapter for babysitting??

    This is partly what I’m talking about. Preaching a false Christ. I wouldn’t blame anyone for rejecting the Jesus preached by a foul-mouthed, hypocrite.

    right4life – With comments like that, you’re the one who should feel shame. You’re the one who is supposed to know better. How can any Christian of any stripe show so much glee at the notion that you think someone will burn in hell for all eternity?

    You need to take a long, long look in the mirror and into your own soul.

  89. #545453
    On November 15th, 2008 at 1:21 am, Joy said:

    right4life – Maybe you need to remember that you’re talking to people that God loves.

    Your comments in this thread are the most despicable simply because you claim to know Christ and claim to know of His love. How can you and say the things you do?

  90. #545456
    On November 15th, 2008 at 1:34 am, mistressjustice said:
  91. #545460
    On November 15th, 2008 at 2:16 am, Politicalguano said:

    Fact#1 Homosexuals disrupting any church service iof any faith s desecration and we are sick of such behavior. If you homosexuals are unhappy with the ballot choices Christians make – tough! You have no right to disrupt our lives and our religious services based on how you think we voted in secrecy. I encourage anyone targeted by homosexuals for voting in this year’s election to file criminal complaints re: voter intimidation.
    Fact#2 We don’t like your anti-Christian comments and rhetoric. If you expect to be spoken to in a decent and polite manner, then shut your damned mouth about our religion. If you are going to say the most inflammatory and hurtful comments about our faith, expect to be treated as an enemy. I personally oppose every GLBT initiative simply to frustrate homosexuals as I am sick of your slander directed against us.
    Fact#3 Despite your perverted lifestyle and your disgraceful rhetoric about our religion, we will still fight to defend your safety and life as well as your privacy. We still see you as fellow Americans – your actions make me think you do not see us in the sane light. i recommend changing your behavior towards us lest we see you as a threat to our freedom and liberty – you do so at your own peril!
    Fact #4 I have never mistreated any gay person. I have raised my children to treat all people politely. Dare to harm or threaten the safety of my family and you will regret it as soon as i find you.

  92. #545508
    On November 15th, 2008 at 6:08 am, conservative in europe said:

    Huggybear said

    Oh my. You are revealing far more about yourself than I think you realize. I don’t know many people — gay, straight, or otherwise — who actually believe they have chosen their own sexual preference. Do you have something you would like to share with the class?

    Is that supposed to make me uncomfortable?

    Huggy, you make my point exactly. You are uncomfortable with your own lifestyle so you try and project it on others to make yourself feel normal.

    What it really comes down to is that I made a statement based on FACTS that disagree with your supposition. Thus, your only argument is to call me gay.

    Grow up.

  93. #545577
    On November 15th, 2008 at 10:23 am, AniMEL said:

    SoCal–no, I cannot cut them some “slack.” Anger is one thing, but taking it out in this fashion? No way. Unacceptable. If you’re a straight guy, fantastic–but please, don’t act as though you really understand it. You don’t understand their side any more than you understand mine. If my fellow gays and lesbians want to change things, they need to start using their heads instead of trying to stir things up and deliberately making other people angry. They’re sabotaging all of us.

    StanW–again, you’re putting words in my mouth. When, exactly, did I say that being bullied for being gay was any worse than any of those other things? I got bullied for other things, too, trust me. I got bullied for not having the cool clothes and cool shoes. I got laughed at because I liked to read. NEVER, at ANY POINT, did I suggest being bullied for being gay required a protected class. You’re beatin’ a dead horse here, dude. I have to ask, though, when was the last time you heard of a kid being beaten unconscious for having red hair? A 14-year-old who is taught in my friends’ music class was beaten severely because he was too “girly” (among a litany of anti-gay slurs). No, I don’t believe in hate crimes legislation, so don’t go there. But contrary to what you think, it is a problem. All bullying should be harshly dealt with, but I don’t think you understand just how violent some kids can get when another kid is just too different for them.

    Joy–again, I have to agree with you.

  94. #545587
    On November 15th, 2008 at 11:08 am, Oh-nO said:

    We do not wrestle against flesh and blood but against principalities of evil and darkness. Love the sinner, hate the sin. Legislate all you want in favor of the homosexual lifestyle, as a commited believer I will fight against it. Not against the person but the principle. There is a reason that homosexuality was a stonable offense in the old testement and still is an abomination in the new. Jesus never spoke directly to the issue, but the words “go and sin no more” carry the weight of eternity. It is our choice, to accept God’s provision in Christ’s sacrifice or reject it. Keep in mind that anything which exalts itself above the Word of God is pure evil.

    I didn’t make the rules, I just play by the rules. I don’t want to be disqualified.

  95. #545615
    On November 15th, 2008 at 12:03 pm, right4life said:

    This is partly what I’m talking about. Preaching a false Christ. I wouldn’t blame anyone for rejecting the Jesus preached by a foul-mouthed, hypocrite.

    you accuse me of preaching a false christ?? who do you think you are?? hmmm?? you should take the log out of your own eye, before you take the spec out of mine ‘honey’ :roll: you sanctimonious holier-than-thou hypocrite.

    you’re a mormon, correct? well all your ‘love’ and your ‘concern’ is based upon a lie. so you can tell someone you ‘care’ but if you don’t tell them the truth, then all your ‘concern’ is just hypocritcal possturing to make yourself feel good.

    and if you are a mormon, then YOU are the one who preaches a false christ.

    right4life – With comments like that, you’re the one who should feel shame. You’re the one who is supposed to know better. How can any Christian of any stripe show so much glee at the notion that you think someone will burn in hell for all eternity?

    you prove you’re a liar, your judgement is false about me. but so nice to put yourself in place of God as my judge.

    As far as the comment about NAMBLA, it makes a very good point, how far do you take this support of the gay lifestyle? hmmmm?? after all NAMBLA is just another ‘alternative lifestyle’ right?? :roll: and who is to say what the age of consent is?? hmmmm??

    you really are a piece of work there joy-less. :roll:

  96. #545617
    On November 15th, 2008 at 12:06 pm, right4life said:

    On November 15th, 2008 at 1:21 am, Joy said:
    right4life – Maybe you need to remember that you’re talking to people that God loves.

    oh and joy-less :roll: my comment about the fool and fire is true…ever hear of casting pearls before swine??

    apparently thats what I am doing with you…. :roll:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Left-wing thug of the day

November 5, 2009 01:18 PM by Michelle Malkin

78 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Maine votes down gay marriage

November 4, 2009 01:25 AM by Michelle Malkin

759 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Breaking: Prop. 8 upheld

May 26, 2009 01:05 PM by Michelle Malkin

100 Comments | 16 Trackbacks

They’ll be back.

Courting trouble

May 26, 2009 06:02 AM by Michelle Malkin

41 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

A pageant Perez Hilton won’t be judging

May 7, 2009 05:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

50 Comments | 3 Trackbacks


Categories: Proposition 8



The Other McCain

» Paralysis by analysis

Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

HotAir GreenRoom